No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Normandy Nursing Center

7301 St Charles Rock Rd, Saint Louis, MO 63133 · For profit - Corporation · 116 certified beds · (314) 862-0555 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0566, F0569)2 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$9,315 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent May 2025
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0566, F0569)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,315 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-20)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6826 Natural Bridge Rd · (314) 389-6700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7150 Natural Bridge Rd Ste 100 · (314) 381-8600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6840 Page Ave · (314) 726-2184 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7391 St Charles Rock Rd · (314) 615-8788 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.5%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms97.7%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.8%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.6%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.7%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table48.1%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.4%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.9%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.502.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.362.331.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
27.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 27.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 7.7–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge27.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge18.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.4–14.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.22
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
56.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 96.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-16)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one of two sampled residents (Resident #1) when a cognitively impaired resident, whose diagnoses included schizophrenia and vascular dementia, left the building unaccompanied. Staff last saw the resident on 10/12/23 at approximately 11:00 P.M. The resident left pillows and clothing in a form under the blankets. Staff did not visualize the resident. Staff did not administer ordered morning medications or provide breakfast. On 10/13/23 at approximately 12:30 P.M., a nurse pulled the covers back, and saw the resident was not there. The resident was found on 10/13/23 at a homeless shelter. He/She tried to find a bus station, but became confused and went to the shelter. The census was 85. The Administrator was informed on 10/20/23 at 3:05 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) past noncompliance which began on 10/13/23. The facility conducted an investigation and immediately in-serviced all staff on 10/14/23 regarding knowing a resident's location, scheduling door code changes, moving the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one resident, (Resident #2) with a history of falls, when staff left the resident unattended on the toilet. The resident attempted to transfer him/herself from the toilet to his/her wheelchair without assistance and fell. When the nurse assessed the resident, he/she guarded his/her right hip and complained of pain. X-ray results showed the resident sustained a fractured right hip. In addition, the facility failed to address falls on the care plan. The sample was four. The census was 95.Review of the facility's Fall Management policy, dated 02/28/23, showed:-Policy: To provide an environment free of accident hazards. The facility completed a Morse Fall Scale Evaluation on residents to determine fall risks, developed appropriate interventions, provided supervision and assistive devices to prevent/minimize further falls and/or reduce injuries;-Upon Admission, the charge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 8 sampled residents, who were involved in resident-to-resident incidents were free from physical abuse (Residents #27 and #37, Residents #39 and #65, Residents #4 and #1 and Residents #86 and #49). The resident-to-resident altercations resulted in injuries. The sample was 19. The census was 95. Review of the Abuse Prevention policy, revised 10/21/22, showed: -Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to facility staff, other residents, and other staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors or any other individual; -Definitions: -Abuse: Willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Abuse may be resident-to-resident; -Procedure: -Screening: The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's (Resident #2) representative after the resident had a change in condition. The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 04/26/26. The resident complained of pain. The physician ordered x-rays on 04/26/26. The resident refused the x-rays on 04/27/26. The x-rays were reordered on 04/29/26. The x-rays showed the resident had a fractured right hip. The resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for evaluation. Staff did not notify the resident's POA of the x-ray refusal, results and transfer to the hospital. The sample was four. The census was 95.Review of the facility's Notification of Change in Condition policy, revised 01/20/26, showed:-Policy: The attending physician/physician extender (nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or clinical nurse specialist) and the resident representative would be notified of a change in a resident's condition, according to standards of practice and federal and/or state regulations;-Responsibility: All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services per acceptable standards of practice for one resident (Resident #1) when the facility failed to provide follow up care and treatment after Resident #1 had an abnormal lab result which showed an acute hepatitis C infection (viral infection that causes liver swelling, called inflammation. Hepatitis C can lead to serious liver damage). The sample size was 7. The census was 96. Review of the facility's Change in Condition Policy, revised 2/6/25, showed:-Policy: The Attending Physician/Physician Extender (Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, or Clinical Nurse Specialist) and the Resident Representative will be notified of a Change in a Resident's Condition, per Standards of Practice and Federal and/or State Regulations;-Responsibility: All Certified Medication Aides, Licensed Nursing Personnel, Nursing Administration, and Director of Nursing;-Procedure: Guideline for Notification of Physician/Resident Representative (not all inclusive):…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food properly in the walk-in cooler and freezer by stacking smashed and wet boxes on top of each other. Staff failed to ensure food items on the menu were consistently available. This resulted in residents receiving alternate meals not equal in nutritional value due to inadequate inventory and improper food storage practices. This had the potential to affect all residents. The sample was 19. The census was 95. Review of the facility's walk-in cooler food storage chart, showed: -Chart showed photos of which food items stored on each shelf; -Top shelf showed ready to eat fruit and vegetables; -The second shelf showed fish, pork and beef; -The third shelf showed ground meats; -The fourth shelf showed chicken and poultry; -The bottom shelf showed thawing foods. 1. Observation on 5/12/25 at 12:50 P.M. and 3:47 P.M., 5/13/25 at 9:43 A.M. and 9:56 A.M., 5/13/25 at 11:14 A.M. and 5/13/25 at 12:17 P.M., of the inside of the walk-in cooler, on the right side, showed a four tier, wire metal shelving unit. On the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public by failing to maintain resident rooms, resident use areas, and public use areas air temperatures below 80 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on the second and third floors. The census was 95. During an interview on 5/13/25 at 9:53 A.M., Resident #33 said the building is always warm it seems, and he/she would like it to be cooler for it to be comfortable for him/her. During an interview on 5/14/25 at 11:00 A.M., Nurse B said the building is always hot and there is always trouble with the chiller system because the building is old. He/She would like it to be cooler inside the building. Observation on 5/14/25 at 9:50 A.M., showed the facility internal air temperature in the hallway outside of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 81 degrees F with a digital thermometer. At 12:10 P.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 82.8 degrees F. Observation on 5/14/25 at 9:54 A.M., showed air temperatures at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards by not maintaining proper body mechanics while transferring a dependent resident (Resident #18). In addition, the facility failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials were kept locked up or stored in a place not accessible to residents for one of one housekeeping closet on the first floor. This had the potential to affect all residents with access to the first floor. The sample was 19. The census was 95. 1. Review of the facility's Gait belt policy, reviewed 10/22, showed: -Position your body close to the resident face to face; -Transfer resident by grasping the gait-belt using an underhand grip; -Allow resident to stand for a moment to gain his/her balance; -Instruct resident to pivot to bear weight; -Maintain contact between the destination surface and the resident's legs; -Perform hand hygiene. Review of Resident #18's diagnoses list, included muscle wasting and atrophy (size decrease and weakness of the muscles), shoulder pain, muscle weakness generalized,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices during perineal care (cleansing from the front of the hips, between the legs and buttocks) for one resident (Resident #26). Staff also failed to follow the facility policy on transporting laundry when staff pressed a resident's clean laundry against their uniform. The sample was 19. The census was 95. 1. Review of the facility's incontinent care policy, dated 7/21/22, showed: -Policy: the facility will provide incontinent care as directed by the plan of care. Care will promote hygiene and prevent infection; -Procedure: -Perform hand hygiene and apply gloves; -Remove soiled brief; -Cleanse the perineal area; -Use a clean wipe for each area; -Remove soiled gloves, perform hand hygiene and apply clean gloves; -Apply ointment, remove gloves, sanitize hands, apply clean gloves. Review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 4/17/25, showed: -Cognitively intact, able to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to provide curtains and/or blinds in a resident room and failed to maintain ceiling tiles in good repair for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident #33). The census was 95. Review of Resident #33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/12/25, showed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the resident's medical record, showed diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (mood disorder) and morbid obesity. Observation on 5/13/25 at 9:00 A.M., showed the resident's private room without blinds or curtains over the window. The window measured approximately 5 feet by 5 feet and allowed for sunshine constantly in the room Observation on 5/14/25 at 9:30 A.M., 5/15/25 at 9:10 A.M., and 5/16/25 at 9:10 A.M., showed the resident's room remained without curtains or blinds. The resident's bathroom contained two brown stained ceiling tiles. Each tile had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0566 — isolated
    1) Protect residents from being forced to work at the nursing home, or 2) let residents work if they want to.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #74), who chose to perform services for the facility, had a care plan developed to address the services to be provided and the decision for these services to be paid or unpaid. The census was 95. Review on of Resident #74 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 4/17/25, showed: -Cognitively intact -Diagnosis of Schizophrenia. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/17/25 and in use at the time of the survey, showed: -No documentation of the resident's desire for work; -No plan specified regarding the nature of the services performed and whether the services are voluntary or paid; -Do documentation if there is payment or if the work is voluntary. Observation on 5/12/25 at 12:50 P.M., showed the resident in the kitchen. He placed plastic utensils inside the envelope/sleeve and placed it on the tray. During an interview on 5/12/25 At 2:48 P.M., the resident said he/she was in the kitchen earlier. He/she works…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from involuntary seclusion for one resident (Resident #45). The facility failed ensure policies and procedures were developed with clinical criteria for placement on the secured unit and to ensure residents who resided on the secured unit were assessed for appropriateness. As a result, the resident had been placed on and remained on the secured unit without clinical rationale. The facility staff failed to notify the resident's next of kin of the relocation from the first floor to the secured unit. The facility failed to assess continued appropriateness of the placement following the move on to the secured unit. Staff were unaware of the rationale for the resident's placement onto the secured unit. During the survey, the resident expressed desire to move back onto the first floor because he/she had friends on the first floor. The sample was 19. The census was 95. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention policy, revised 10/21/22, showed: -Policy: the facility is committed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a communication policy, clinical assessment, and individualized criteria in place to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish when staff failed to accommodate one resident's communication needs (Resident #45). The sample was 19. The census was 95. Review of the facility's Residents' [NAME] of Rights policy, revised 6/23, showed: -Policy: Get Proper Medical care; -Definitions: To be fully informed about your total health status in a language resident understands. Review of Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/7/25, showed: -Diagnoses included stroke, aphasia (difficulty speaking), paralysis, seizures, anxiety, depression, and bipolar disease; -Severe cognitive impairment; -No behaviors, experienced daily inattention and disorganized thinking; -Moderate depression; -Required staff assistance with toileting and hygiene. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 3/20/25, showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate perineal care (cleansing from the front of the hips, between the legs and buttocks, to the back of the hips) for two of two perineal care observations (Resident #26 and Resident #18). The sample was 19. The census was 95. Review of the facility's Incontinent Care policy, dated 7/21/25, showed: -Policy: the facility will provide incontinent care as directed by the plan of care. Incontinent care will promote hygiene; -Procedure: -Staff cleanse the perineal area with cleanser; -For female residents: separate the skin, cleanse one side and then the other, then cleanse down the center of the skin in a front to back manner; -Cleanse the thighs, area between the buttocks. 1. Review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/17/25, showed: -Cognitively intact, able to make needs and wants known; -Does not refuse care; -Physical impairments to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to treat wounds for one of two sampled residents found to have wounds by the certified nursing assistant (CNA) and the wounds were not reported to the nurse and treatments not ordered timely (Resident #18). The sample was 19. The census was 95. Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, dated 11/15/22, showed: -Policy: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, the facility will provide evidence-based treatment sin accordance with current standards of practice and physician order; -The charge nurse will notify the physician if the absence of treatment orders. Review of Resident #18's diagnoses list included peripheral vascular disease (reduced blood flow to the upper/lower extremities), muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size and weakness of the muscles), urinary tract infections (UTIs), overactive bladder (frequently feeling the urge to urinate), need for assistance with personal care, cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to treat pressure related wounds for one of one sampled resident found to have wounds by the certified nursing assistant (CNA) and the wounds were not reported to the nurse and treatments not ordered timely (Resident #18). The sample was 19. The census was 95. Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, dated 11/15/22, showed: -Policy: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, the facility will provide evidence-based treatment sin accordance with current standards of practice and physician order; -The charge nurse will notify the physician if the absence of treatment orders. Review of Resident #18's diagnoses list included peripheral vascular disease (reduced blood flow to the upper/lower extremities), muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size and weakness of the muscles), urinary tract infections (UTIs), overactive bladder (frequently feeling the urge to urinate), need for assistance with personal care, cerebral palsy (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dialysis agreements between the dialysis center and the facility for residents that receive dialysis (the process of filtering toxins from the blood in individuals with kidney failure). The facility identified two residents who receive dialysis. Both receive dialysis at different outside dialysis centers. Both were included in the sample and concerns were identified with both residents (Residents #35 and #60). The sample was 19. The census was 95. During an interview on 5/16/25 at 10:00 A.M., the Administrator said they do not have a dialysis policy. They just use the dialysis pre and post assessment forms. 1. Review of Resident #35's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -admission date: 3/14/25; -The resident received dialysis; -Diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD), stroke, and seizure disorder. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 27 opportunities observed, three errors occurred, resulting in a 11.11% error rate (Resident #60 and Resident #1). The census was 95. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, revised 8/14, showed: -Policy: medication are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices; -Procedures: -Preparation: -Five rights: right resident, right dose, right drug, right route, right time are applied for each medication being administered; -Prepare the dose, the dose is removed from the container and verified against the label and Medication Administration Record (MAR); -If a medication with a current, active order cannot be located in the medication cart/drawer, other areas of the medication cart, medication room, and facility (other units) are searched, if possible. If the medication cannot be located after further investigation, the pharmacy is contacted or medication removed from the night box/emergency kit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided therapeutic diets as prescribed by the attending physician and/or according to their care plan, for one resident with an order for renal diet (Resident #35). In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents with orders for a mechanical soft diet received the appropriate texture after residents were served grilled cheese. This had the potential to affect all residents. The sample was 19. The census was 95. 1. Review of Resident #35's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/25/25, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Receives dialysis; -Diagnoses included deep venous thrombosis (blood clots), heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), renal failure, hyperkalemia (high electrolyte potassium in the blood), thyroid disorder, hyperlipidemia (high level of fat particles in the blood), stroke, seizure disorder, schizophrenia (disorder that affects a person's ability to think, behave, or feel clearly),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement sanitary practices and conditions within the dietary department to prevent the potential for contamination of food during storage, preparation, and distribution when staff failed to keep the kitchen equipment and floors clean, free of dust, grease, and grime. Additionally, the facility failed to keep soap dispenser in the main kitchen filled. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility's kitchen. The sample was 10. The census was 97. Review of the facility's Nutritional Service Sanitation policy, revised 11/21/24, showed: -Policy: Nutritional service shall ensure a clean and sanitary work environment; to promote and protect food safety; and, to maintain compliance with Federal, State, and Local regulations governing food sanitation and safety; -Responsibility: Dietary Aide, Dietary Cook, Registered Dietitian, and Dietary Manager; -Procedure: -Personnel shall be responsible for daily, weekly, and monthly cleaning assignment as determined by the dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, home-like environment when staff did not keep one resident's (Resident #5) shower clean and free of feces and failed to clean his/her bathroom, prior to the resident's bathroom being locked for service repair. The facility failed to maintain resident showers in good condition and/or repair by not having all sides of the shower wall finished (Resident #4) and failed to replace/repair the cove base that had separated from the wall of the shower in another resident's room (Resident #1). Additionally, the facility failed to keep clean the community bathroom and clean utility room sink on the 3rd floor. The sample size was 10. The census was 97. Review of the facility's essential functions of the Housekeeping Supervisor, revised 05/2022, showed: -The Housekeeping Supervisor will oversee and schedule a team responsible for creating a clean and comforting home for residents in long-term care. In addition to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by not ensuring resident rooms were free from bed bugs (small, oval, brown insects that feed on the blood of animals and humans) (Residents #8 and #10). The sample was 10. The census was 97. Review of the facility's Pest Control policy, last reviewed 8/31/24, showed: -Policy: The facility maintains an effective pest control program to remain free of pest and rodents. Pest control strategies are developed emphasizing kitchens, cafeterias. Laundries, central supply areas, loading docks, construction activities, and other regions prone to pest infestations. Environmental services/Designee will maintain records of pest control protocol and contracts with pest control services; -Responsibility: Maintenance Director, Environmental Services, and Administrator; -Procedure: -General measures to decrease pests include the elimination of cracks and crevices; -A contract with a pest control company may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's right to be free from physical abuse was not violated when one resident (Resident #4) was hit in the face by another resident (Resident #9), which caused a scratch under his/her left eye. Resident #4 did not want to return to his/her room because of being fearful of being attacked again. The sample was 6. The census was 99. Review of the facility's Abuse Policy, dated 10/21/22, showed the following: -Policy: The facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, visitors, or any other individual; -Abuse: Willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. This includes the deprivation by an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to administer an antipsychotic medication prescribed for behaviors for one resident by the psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) (Resident #1). The sample was three. The census was 100. Review of the facility Physician's Order Policy, dated 9/28/22, showed the following: -Policy: To provide guidance and ensure Physician Orders are transcribed and implemented in accordance with Professional Standards, State & Federal Guidelines; -Responsibility: Licensed Nurses, Nursing Administration, & Director of Nursing; -Procedure: -Physician Orders shall be provided by Licensed Practitioners (Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, & Physician's Assistants) authorized to prescribe orders; -Orders must be recorded in the medical record by the Licensed Nurse authorized to transcribe such orders; -Physician Orders must be documented clearly in the medical record. The required components of a complete order: -Date and Time of Order; -Name of Practitioner Providing Order; -Name and Strength of Medication/Treatment;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed within 30 days for the final accounting for residents who expired. This affected three residents who expired and had money in their accounts (Residents #141, #140 and #87). The sample size was 18. The census was 88. 1. Review of Resident #141's medical record, showed: -Effective/Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $30.64; -No documentation of TPL completed. 2. Review of Resident #140's medical record, showed: -Effective/Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $842.44; -No documentation of TPL completed. 3. Review of Resident #87's medical record, showed: -Effective/Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $4354.37 -No documentation of TPL completed. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:58 P.M., the Regional Business Office Manager said TPLs were not done for the residents. She was aware they should have been done within 30 days of a resident's death. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:50 A.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The census was 88. Review of the facility's list of current employees, provided on 12/13/23, showed a Director of Nursing (DON). No other full-time RNs were employed. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, last reviewed on 1/6/23, showed: -Number of licensed beds: 116; -Average daily census: 76. Review of the facility's payroll-based journal (PBJ) report, showed: -No RN hours in April 2023, on Saturday 4/15/23; -No RN hours in May 2023, on: -Saturday 5/6/23; -Saturday 5/13/23; -Sunday 5/14/23; -Saturday 5/20/23; -Sunday 5/21/23; -Saturday 5/27/23; -Sunday 5/28/23; -No RN hours in June 2023, on: -Saturday 6/3/23; -Sunday 6/4/23; -Saturday 6/10/23; -Saturday 6/17/23; -Sunday 6/18/23. Review of the facility's December 2023 staffing sheet, showed no RN scheduled. Observation showed the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) was in the facility on the week of the survey, from 12/12/23 through 12/15/23. He/She was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified six medication carts and three medications rooms. There were two medication carts and one medication room on each floor. Four medication carts and three medication rooms were checked, and issues were found with all. Staff failed to secure controlled substances (drugs or chemicals that have the potential to be addictive or habit-forming) under double lock on the second floor, failed to date medications and biologicals when they were opened on all floors, failed to separate medication from food items in the refrigerator on the first floor, and failed to separate medication and topical treatment medications on the third floor. The census was 88. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications Policy, dated: policy revised 11/2018, showed: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide residents with super cereal (highly fortified food that provides extra calories and/or protein) for one breakfast. The census was 88. The sample was 18. Review of the facility's Nutritional Supplements Policy, dated 12/1/22, showed the following: -Policy: The Facility will have a formulary of Nutritional Supplements to be utilized as interventions to help ensure nutritional needs are met; -Procedure: Nutritional needs and nutritional intakes are reviewed by the Registered Dietitian upon admission and as needed. Supplements may be recommended and initiated by the Registered Dietitian and/or Nursing to address but not limit to weight loss and wound healing or altered labs. Nursing and/or Designee to monitor acceptance and tolerance. Supplements may be discontinued if not accepted or tolerated. Supplements delivered by the nutritional service department may not necessitate a Physician Order may include but not limit to house shake, magic cup (high calorie ice cream or yogurt), and fortified juice. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine had an air gap. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 88. The sample was 18. Observation on 12/11/23 at 10:05 A.M., showed the ice machine in the dining room did not have an air gap. During an interview on 12/14/23 at 7:38 A.M., the Maintenance Director said he was not aware the ice machine did not have an air gap. He expected for the ice machine to have an air gap so the ice does not get contaminated if the pipes backed up. During an interview on 12/14/23 at 10:06 A.M., the Administrator said she was not aware the ice machine did not have an air gap. She expected for the ice machine to have an air gap.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information and education to each resident or the resident's representative for the pneumococcal vaccines. This affected four of five sampled residents (Resident #25, #19, #23 and #10). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 88. Record review of the facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, reviewed and approved on 4/28/22, showed: -Policy: The opportunity to receive the Pneumococcal vaccine will be extended to all residents, the facility will provide pertinent information regarding the risks/benefits of receiving the vaccine; -Procedure: -Residents will be offered the Pneumococcal vaccine upon admission. Administration of additional doses will be completed in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines; -Resident/Resident Representatives will be notified of the availability of the Pneumococcal Vaccine; -Obtain consent. Consent Immunizations/Vaccine consent Form will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a mental health disorder and/or individuals with intellectual disabilities had a DA-124 Level One Screen (used to evaluate for the presence of psychiatric conditions to determine if a Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Level Two Screen was required), as required for one of two residents sampled (Resident #33) for PASARR. The sample was 18. The census was 88. Review of Resident #33's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/4/23, showed: -Entry date (date of this admission/re-entry into facility): 11/21/23; -admitted : 1/14/22; -Diagnoses included dementia, depression, and schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). Review of the resident's medical record, showed: -No DA-124 Level one screen; -No PASARR Level two screen. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator said the resident had been at the facility for over a year. The facility did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide diets and supplements as ordered to ensure residents maintained acceptable nutritional status for one resident (Resident #69) who experienced a significant weight loss. The sample size was 18. The census was 88. Review of the facility's Weight Variances policy, revised 8/9/23, showed: -Policy: All residents who experience significant, insidious and/or unintentional/unplanned weight loss or gains shall be assessed for nutritional status by the Registered Dietician (RD). Recommendations from RD to include but not limit to adding calorie rich/preferred snacks between meals, fortification, supplements, liberalizing diet, and plan for expected weight changes. Residents receiving supplements shall be monitored for acceptance by the Dietary Manager/Nursing staff. Residents at risk for unintentional/unplanned weight variance may be monitored with weekly weights. Weights shall be monitored by the RD for review and assessment; -Responsibility: Nursing Personnel, RD, Dietary Personnel and Dietary Manager;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-15 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with reasonable access to a telephone and privacy for phone conversations when three of 12 sampled residents (Residents #173 and #20 and #75) were observed making a personal phone calls in the open area of the 200 and 100 halls. The census was 25. 1. Review of Resident #173's medical record, showed the following: -An admission date of 5/11/20; -Diagnoses included diabetes, respiratory disorder and paranoid schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves including delusions and hallucinations). Observation of the 200 hall on 9/14/20 at approximately 9:45 A.M., showed the resident sat in the open area across from the nurse's station at an over the bed table where the 200 hall resident phone was located. The resident used the phone while facility staff and other residents stood and sat nearby. The resident's conversation could be overheard from the nurse's station. During an interview on 9/14/20 at 9:50 A.M., the resident said he/she did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all physician's orders were followed by not properly performing pain assessments, not administering pain medicine as ordered, not obtaining an order for oxygen (O2) administration and not recording heart rate as ordered before medication administration. The facility also failed to clarify orders with the physician regarding a medication's dosage, the correct diagnosis for a medications administration and have a diagnosis to support the administration of another medication. Furthermore the facility failed to return a controlled substance medication to the pharmacy after it was discontinued, failed to obtain orders for the administration of two different medications and failed to administer all morning medications for two different residents. These deficient practices affected 6 out of 12 sampled residents (Residents #16, #10, #20, #173, #74 and #75) The census was 25. 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record, showed diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis of the body from the neck down), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers as scheduled and on a routine basis. In addition, staff failed to shave three residents on a consistent basis and failed to provide fingernail care for one resident who repeatedly asked for assistance. These deficient practices affected four of 12 sampled residents (Residents #16, #20, #8, and #2). The census was 25. 1. Review of Resident #16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/23/20, showed the following: -Adequate short term and long term memory; -Independent decisions, consistent and reasonable; -Required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene; -Unable to ambulate. Review of the medical record, showed diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down), contracture of the right hand (inability to move and stretch the hand) and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program during a Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, by not following current infection control standards. Staff failed to properly wear facemasks while preparing and serving food and failed to provide soap on the second floor hall resident use bathrooms. The sample size was 12. The census was 25. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Preparing for COVID-19 in Nursing Homes, updated 6/25/20, showed the following: -Implement Source Control Measures: -Health care personnel (HCP) should wear a facemask at all times while they are in the facility; -Provide Supplies Necessary to Adhere to Recommended Infection Prevention and Control Practices: -Hand Hygiene Supplies: -Make sure that sinks are well-stocked with soap and paper towels for handwashing. Review of the CDC Using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), updated August 19, 2020, showed the following: -Facemasks Do's and Don'ts for HCP: -When putting on your facemask, clean your hands and put on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 25 opportunities observed, two errors occurred, resulting in an 8% error rate (Resident #6). The census was 25. Review of Resident #6's medical record, showed the following: -Diagnoses included heart failure, lung disease, bipolar (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs and lows) and schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves); -An order, dated 4/30/20, to administer Lithium (mood stabilizer used to treat bipolar) 300 milligrams (mg), one tablet daily; -An order, dated 7/30/20, to administer Vitamin D 2000 units, one tablet daily. Observation on 9/11/20 at 8:22 A.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) C, administered the resident's morning medications. He/she did not administer Lithium or Vitamin D. Review of the electronic medication administration record e(MAR) on 9/11/20 at 9:55 A.M., showed Vitamin D and Lithium signed as administered. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-15 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the federal survey results for all residents and visitors to view. The sample was 18. The census was 88. Observations of the facility on 12/18/23 at 10:30 A.M., showed no posting of the survey results. During the Resident Council interview on 12/13/23 at 11:14 A.M., six residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, said they did not know where the survey results were located. During an interview on 12/14/23 at 10:03 A.M., the Administrator said there is no sign posted notifying residents and family members of the location of the federal survey results. She also said the survey binder is in the front office and not accessible. She said the survey binder and sign have not been accessible for at least a year. She expected the survey results to be posted and accessible to residents and family members. The Administrator is in charge of posting the survey results.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-15 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents/resident representatives with a written letter stating the reason the resident was transferred to the hospital and failed to notify a representative of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of residents who were transferred/discharged from the facility. The facility identified 21 residents who were transferred to an acute care hospital. The census was 88. Review of the facility's admission and Discharge Report, dated 9/15/23 through 12/11/23, showed 21 residents were transferred to the hospital. During an interview on 12/14/23 at 9:39 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said when a resident was transferred to the hospital, the facility sent a copy of the face sheet and the physician orders. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 9:11 A.M. and 12/15/23 at 10:21 A.M., the Administrator said the facility did not provide the resident/resident representative with a written letter at the time of transfer or as soon as practicable. The facility did not notify the Ombudsman of when residents were transferred or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-15 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Bed Hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave (absences for purposes other than required hospitalization or hospitalization) Policy, when the resident was transferred to the hospital. The facility identified 21 residents who were transferred to the hospital. The census was 88. Review of the facility's Resident Bed Hold Policy, dated last reviewed 11/15/22, showed: -Policy: The facility will provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold policy prior to transferring a resident to the hospital or therapeutic leave as required by State/Federal guidelines; -Procedure: The facility will have a process in place to ensure residents and/or their representatives are made aware of the facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy in advance of being transferred to the hospital or when taking therapeutic leave of absence from the facility; -The facility will have policies that address holding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,315 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $9,315 — penalty dated 2023-10-20
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-20 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MGM HEALTHCARE — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 26 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Arbor Hills Care & Rehab CenterFerguson, MO 1 of 5Bentwood Nursing & RehabFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Broadway Care & Rehab CenterMuskogee, OK 1 of 5Florissant Valley Health & Rehabilitation CenterFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Lansdowne VillageSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Leisure Village Health Care CenterTulsa, OK 1 of 5Quarters At Des Peres, TheDes Peres, MO 1 of 5South Pointe Rehabilitation and Care CenterOklahoma City, OK 1 of 5Springfield Skilled Care CenterSpringfield, MO 1 of 5St Sophia Health & Rehabilitation CenterFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Eastgate Village Care & Rehab CenterMuskogee, OK 2 of 5Heritage Villa Care & Rehab CenterBartlesville, OK 2 of 5Sherbrooke VillageSaint Louis, MO 2 of 5Spring Valley Health & Rehabilitation CenterSpringfield, MO 2 of 5Sunset Health Care CenterUnion, MO 2 of 5Walnut Grove Care & Rehab CenterMcAlester, OK 3 of 5Forest Hills Care And Rehabilitation CenterBroken Arrow, OK 3 of 5Fort Gibson Care & Rehab CenterFort Gibson, OK 3 of 5Oak Park Care CenterSaint Louis, MO 4 of 5Cleveland Care And Rehab CenterCleveland, OK 4 of 5Coweta Care & Rehab CenterCoweta, OK 4 of 5Jackson ManorJackson, MO 4 of 5Mitchell Care & Rehab CenterMcAlester, OK 4 of 5Rainbow Health Care Community And Rainbow AssistedBristow, OK 4 of 5Seminole Care And Rehabilitation CenterSeminole, OK 5 of 5Camelot Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterFarmington, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NORMANDY INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST47%since 09/18/2017
WUNDER, LAURAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/11/2022
BIENSTOCK, JUDAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$872K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 7%Other / private 5%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $872K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$256per resident / day
operating cost
$7,795per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$221per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265578. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next