Hallmark Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 83.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide sanitary meal service when two kitchen staff failed to don [put on] appropriate facial hair covers for food preparation. This failure had the potential to affect 79 residents receiving dietary services from the facility. Findings include:Review of the facility policy Nutrition Policies and Procedures dated 10/15/25 revealed, POLICY: The Dietary Department employees will adhere to a facility dress code that facilitates safe and sanitary meal production and service .6. Appropriate hair restraints (hair covers or nets, beard restraints) while involved in food production activities . On 04/29/26 from 5:49 AM through approximately 6:20 AM, a brief tour of the kitchen was conducted. Upon entry to the kitchen, [NAME] (DD) and Dietary Aide (FF) were observed preparing breakfast. Both staff had facial hair/beards. They were wearing head covers but had not donned facial hair covers prior to the surveyor donning a hair net and asking staff if facial hair covers were available for them to use to cover their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act promptly and to provide documented responses to recurring grievances related to call light response times that were expressed during resident council meetings for 10 of 13 months of meeting minutes reviewed. (June 2025, July 2025, August 2025, September 2025, October 2025, November 2025, December 2025, January 2026, February 2026, and March 2026) Findings include:A review of the undated facility policy titled, Social Services Policies and Procedures, with a revision date of 11/06/23, revealed, Subject: Complaints/Grievances process. Policy: . 2. Facility Leadership acts promptly to understand and resolve complaints and grievances completed in a reasonable expected time frame . Responsibility of Grievance Official: Identifying a Grievance Official who is appointed by the Administrator and who is responsible for: 1. Overseeing the grievance process, receiving, and tracking grievances through to their conclusions . 5. As necessary, taking immediate action to prevent further potential violations . Grievance Reports: . C.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control guidelines. Specifically, clean linens were improperly stored in the soiled linen room and the laundry room was unclean, increasing the risk of cross-contamination. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Laundry dated 03/2006, states, All Linens . 1. Linens are to be handled in a safe manner to prevent contamination of the linen, the personnel and the environment . 6. Clean and soiled linen never comes in contact with each other . Housekeeping of Laundry facility: 1. The laundry facilities is to be kept clean and debris free. During an observation and interview on 03/24/25 at 11:15 AM, clean laundry (pillows, containers of clothes and other clean items) were being stored in the soiled room. The Laundry Director (LD) stated there should not be clean items in here and that they have a shed outside that we can keep the extra clean items. During an interview on 03/24/25 at 11:45 AM, the Facility Administrator (FA) stated, There should not be clean laundry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition. Specifically, 1 of the 2 washing machines in the laundry room was leaking water and chemicals from the rear of the machine. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Clinical Equipment Management last revised December 12, 2016, states, Inspections and maintenance will comply with all governing agencies and equipment manufacturer's recommendations in order to maintain safe operating conditions . prior to the use of all machines in the department, it will be the responsibility of the operator or provider of service to be certain that the machine is in good operational condition. During an observation and interview, in the laundry room, on 03/24/25 at 11:10 AM, Washing Machine 1 was observed squirting water from the back of the machine onto the wall and floor surrounding the machine. The Laundry Director (LD) stated, We have a drain back there, and I did not notice the water shooting out of the back of the machine before. I will have to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired and out dated medications and biological's were removed and not in use with residents' current medications and biological's, from 3 of 3 medication carts and 1 of 2 treatment carts. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, General Guidelines for Storage of Medication and Biological's revealed, 1) Medications and biological's are stored safely, securely and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier . Procedures: . 5. Medications with manufacturer's expiration date expressed in month and year will expire on the last day of the the month. 6. Once any medication or biological package is opened, the facility should follow manufacturer/supplier guidelines in respect to expiration dates of opened medications . 12. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without closures are immediately removed from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)57 was clean, dressed, and free from facial hair, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respect and dignity. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, Optimal Function, revised on May 5, 2023, documents, The facility provides care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. The Facility provides necessary care to all residents that are unable to carry out activities of daily living on their own to ensure they maintain proper nutrition, grooming and hygiene . Procedures: 1. Facility staff recognize and assess an inability to perform ADLs, or a risk for decline in any ability to perform ADLs by reviewing the most current or most recent quarterly assessment. 3. Facility staff develop and implement interventions in accordance with the resident's assessed needs, goals for care,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to refer Resident (R)20 for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II, after the resident received a new diagnosis of a severe mental illness and/or experienced a significant change in status assessment related to their mental illness, for 1 of 2 residents, (Resident (R)20), reviewed for PASARR. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, PASARR Documentation Policy last revised June 9, 2023, documented under PASARR Care Plan, 6 Any resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, ID or a related condition must be referred, by the facility to the appropriate state-designated mental health or intellectual disability authority for review. Review of R20's PASARR Level I Screening Form, dated 11/21/14, revealed the following diagnoses: sepsis, hypertension, seizures and [UE] extremities. R20 had no diagnoses of mental illness nor a history of psychiatric hospitalization in the past…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure placement of a feeding tube (abdominal) for Resident (R)45, before flushing with water and inserting oral medications into the tube, for 1 of 1 residents observed receiving medications via a feeding tube. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Enteral Feeding - Administering Medications documented, The licensed nurse will administer medications prescribed by the physician to be given by enteral tube, using the appropriate method according to recognized standards of practice. The licensed nurse will verify correct tube placement on those devices that are not inserted directly into the gut, per clinical standards of practice. The facility admitted R45 on 01/03/25, with diagnoses including, but not limited to: stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, protein calorie malnutrition and vascular dementia along with dysphagia and aphasia. Review of R45's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/09/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication irregularities were identified and reported to the physician for 2 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident (R)28 and R43. Specifically, R28's hydrocodone-acetaminophen (used to treat pain), venlafaxine (an antidepressant) and R43's olanzapine (an antipsychotic) were documented with the incorrect indication of use. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Management Program last revised 05/05/23, states, The Facility implements a Medication Management program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements . 2. Licensed Independent Practitioners, licensed nurses, consulting pharmacists, and pharmacy service providers collaborate and review medication orders to ensure medical and clinical necessity and appropriateness. The primary mechanism for this validation is an initial and ongoing medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1, while having an acute neurological change, was free from continued falls and injuries, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, dated May 5, 2023, titled, Fall Management revealed under policy, qualified staff evaluates resident and determines contributing causes, addresses risk factors for the fall such as the residents medical condition and determines interventions to prevent future falls. Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted R1 on 07/25/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to: Schizoaffective Disorder, heart disease, metabolic encephalopathy, unsteadiness of feet, dementia, history of falling, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and essential hypertension. Review of R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/31/24, revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC