The Courtyards At Pasadena

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 196 beds and averages 133.6 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (CR #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure CR #1, who was cognitively impaired and wearing a wander guard, received adequate supervision when the facility sent him to the doctor's office unsupervised. CR #1 left the doctor's office and was found outside of a building in the rain by a bystander. An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 1/26/24 at 9:40 a.m. While the IJ was removed on 1/27/24 at 3:30 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. This failure could place residents at risk of elopement or injury. Findings include: Record review of CR #1's face sheet dated 12/2/23 revealed a [AGE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all medications to meet the needs of each resident for two of six residents (Resident #37 and Resident #20) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN B followed the manufacturer's instructions to prime the Humalog pen (Insulin Lispro) (Hormone) prior to dialing in the required amount of Insulin to be administered to Resident #37 on 05/12/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN A followed the manufacturer's instructions to prime the Humalog pen (Insulin Lispro) (Hormone) and the Liraglutide (Hormone) prior to dialing in the required amount of Insulin and Glucagon-like peptide-1 hormone to be administered to Resident #20 and failed to ensure RN A held the pen to Resident #20's skin the required amount of time to ensure complete administration of the Humalog on 05/12/26. These failures placed residents at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen in that: The facility dietary staff failed to ensure temperatures were taken of grilled cheese before serving to residents during lunch meal service on 5/12/26.The facility dietary staff failed to properly sanitize the thermometer while temping each food. The facility dietary staff failed to use proper hand hygiene during lunch service on 5/12/26The facility dietary staff failed to properly wear hair nets during lunch service on 5/12/26. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness if consumed and food cross contamination.Findings Include: An observation and interview with Dietary [NAME] G of lunch food service on 5/12/26 at 11:04 am revealed temperatures of food were taken by [NAME] G. Dietary [NAME] G stated they had no sanitizing wipes to wipe the thermometer because they had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for six of eight residents (Resident #100, Resident #37, Resident #20, Resident #34, Resident #5 and Resident #13) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN B performed hand hygiene after obtaining a FSBS for Resident #100 and Resident # 37 on 05/12/26 and failed to allow the glucometer the full 2 minutes of contact time to ensure adequate disinfection prior to using on Resident #37 on 05/12/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN A performed hand hygiene after sanitizing the glucometer, after glove removal after obtaining FSBS on Resident #20, and before retrieving Resident # 20's insulin pen on 05/12/26. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA C and CNA D performed hand hygiene during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 (Resident #129) of 8 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #129's oxygen therapy. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not receiving necessary care and services. Record review of Resident #129's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/23/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 11/22/23 and readmission date of 05/08/26. Pertinent diagnoses included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus type 2 (high blood sugar), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (a group of brain disorders causing cognitive, behavioral, and language decline, often affecting individuals…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #86) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #86 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 05/12/26. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life.Record review of Resident #86's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/08/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 09/22/25, and readmission on [DATE]. Resident #86 had active diagnoses which included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugar), cerebral vascular accident (stroke) hemiplegia (partial paralysis on one side of the body), and heart failure. Resident#86 had a BIMS score of 14/15 indicating intact cognition. Further review revealed she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 4 (Resident #129) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #129's oxygen tubing was dated, and the humidifier bottle changed weekly per MD order on 05/12/26. These deficient practices could place residents who receive respiratory care at an increased risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care.Record review of Resident #129's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/23/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 11/22/23 and readmission date of 05/08/26. Pertinent diagnoses included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus type 2 (high blood sugar), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (a group of brain disorders causing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen. -The facility failed to ensure that one of one deep fryer grease was clean. -The facility failed to ensure that the stove in the kitchen was kept clean. -The facility failed to ensure that the rail above the stove was free of grease. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness if consumed and food contamination Kitchen observation and interview with the Dietary Manager on 03/17/25 at 8:45AM, revealed the following: The cooking area revealed the deep fryer had dark looking grease with brown floating substances on top of the grease. In the interview, the Dietary Manager said the grease was supposed to be changed weekly. She was not sure when it was changed last, sometimes last week. Observation of one of two stoves in the kitchen revealed baked on grease (a dark looking substance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected resident's status for 3 (Resident #9, Resident #43 and Resident #380) of 6 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #9's admission MDS dated [DATE] accurately reflected her inability to hear normal conversation and her oral dental need. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #43's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] accurately reflected the resident had functional limitation in range of motion of upper and lower extremities. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #380's discharge MDS dated [DATE] accurately reflected the resident's fall that occurred on 2/8/25. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care and services based on inaccurate assessments. Findings include: Resident #9 Record Review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 3/19/25, revealed [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Residents #73 and #119) of 6 residents and 3 of 4 staff (CNA I, CNA J, CNA K) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that proper signage was in place for Resident #73 and Resident #119 who were on enhanced barrier precautions. The facility failed to ensure that CNA I, CNA J, and CNA K were knowledgeable and able to appropriately answer questions regarding enhanced barrier precautions. The facility failed to ensure that CNA I was wearing PPE while caring for Resident #73 who was on enhanced barrier precautions. The failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices. Findings include: Resident #73 Record Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure completion of a discharge summary including a recapitulation of the resident's stay, and final status at discharge for 2 of 3 residents (CR #127 & CR #128) reviewed for discharge summary. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary for CR #127. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary for CR #128. These failures could place residents at risk of not having complete records after permanent discharge from the facility. Findings included: CR #127 Record review of the face sheet for CR #127 revealed a 77- year- old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, malignant neoplasm of brain (brain cancer), dementia (a condition in which a loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with activities of daily life), repeated falls, pain, and seizures. Record review of CR #127's EMR on [DATE] at 11:40 am revealed that CR #127 died at the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,827 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-01-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX