Marina Pointe Healthcare & Subacute
5240 Sepulveda Blvd, Culver City, CA 90230 · For profit - Corporation · 116 certified beds · (310) 391-7266 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 5.9% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 15.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.17 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.0%CMS range 29.6–48.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 9.2–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.7–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.50 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 96.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.73 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the physician regarding one of five sampled resident's (Resident 1) skin integrity. Resident 1 had an increase in moisture associated skin damage ([MASD] skin damage due to prolonged exposure to different sources of moisture such as feces, urine, sweat, or saliva), underneath both breasts and groin areas. As a result, there was a two-month delay in treatment to Resident 1's MASD. Resident 1 endured constant skin irritation under her right and left beast and groin area and was transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on 7/25/2023. Resident 1 was found to have skin breakdown to both breast with malodorous (unpleasant or offensive odor), grey, and thick discharge extending to the perineal area (located between the anus and vagina). Resident 1 also had skin breakdown to the lower abdominal wall in the groin area that was malodorous and wet. Resident 1 remained in the GACH until 8/4/2023. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consent was completed with all required elements for two of six sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 30).This deficient practice has the potential to result in residents receiving treatments or interventions without understanding the risks, benefits, or alternatives.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included anoxic brain damage (brain damage happens when the brain does not get any oxygen at all causing the brain cells to become injured or die), Type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and hyperlipidemia (too much fat in the blood).During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/18/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 2 did not have the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents' (Residents 95 and 109) call light was placed within reach.This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 95 and 109 not to be able to call for assistance and delay the assistance needed.Findings: During a review of Resident 95's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 95 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 95's diagnoses included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or partial paralysis affecting one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities.)During a review of Resident 95's History and Physical (H&P) dated 12/1/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 95 did not have the capacity to understand and make medical decisions.During a review of Resident 95's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 5) had a completed Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, when the POLST form did not include a resident or responsible party signature.This failure had the potential to result in the resident's treatment preferences and wishes not being known or honored in the event of an emergency.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 5's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty breathing) and diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated [DATE], the H&P indicated Resident 5 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed for two of four sampled residents (Resident 73 and 97) when there were no care plans for Resident 73's diagnoses of anxiety (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), Alzheimer's Disease (progressive mental deterioration) major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes dramatic shifts in a person's mood, energy and ability to think clearly) and Resident 97's diagnoses of anxiety, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder.These deficient practices had the potential to result in delayed care and services for Resident 73's and Resident 97's health.Findings:During a review of Resident 73's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 73 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 73's diagnoses included anxiety, Alzheimer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a humidifier to the oxygenator machine for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 49).This failure had the potential to allow mucous to thicken, dry, and create a mucous plug and block oxygen to the lungs.Findings:During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 49 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 49's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (long term, gradual, progressive condition where the lungs cannot adequately transfer oxygen to the blood, resulting in persistently low blood oxygen levels), tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck for a tube to be inserted directly into the windpipe to help with breathing), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).During a review of Resident 49's History & Physical (H&P), dated 3/5/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 49 did not have the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient numbers of nursing aides were available on weekends to provide nursing care to 10 out of 10 sampled residents in accordance with resident care plans and assessed needs.This deficient practice has the potential to result in delayed or missed care, including delays in assistance with activities of daily living (ADL, activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily), timely response to call lights, increased risk for falls, skin breakdown, and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 8 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 8's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (loss of strength and paralysis on one side of a body following a stroke [death of brain tissue caused by a sudden lack of oxygen and nutrients]), a stage 4 pressure ulcer at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four trash bins were covered.This failure has the potential to attract pests, such as rodents and flies, to the area.Findings:During an observation on 4/21/2026 at 8:57 a.m., at the outside area where trash bins are stored, two trash bins were uncovered.During an observation and interview on 4/21/2026 at 9:25 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), two open trash bins were uncovered. The DS stated the trash bins should be covered. The DS stated if the bins were not covered, pests, such as rodents or flies, could come into the facility, and land on the residents' food.During an interview on 4/24/2026 at 11:35 a.m. with the Director Of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the trash bins should be covered. The DON stated if the bins are not covered, flies would be attracted by the smell, and it would not be safe for the staff, residents, or visitors.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal, dated 10/2017, the P&P indicated all garbage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control when:a) Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 9) and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3) did not implement appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE, special clothing or gear to wear to protect the body from getting sick) during care of two out of 10 sampled residents (Resident 18 and 65).b) Rehabilitative Nurse Assistant (RNA) 1 walked in the hallways wearing a disposable gown.c) Laundry Staff (L1) did not use a gown when folding clean linen or loading dirty linen and attended to the clean and dirty linen at the same time.These failures had the potential to result in residents being exposed to infectious agents and becoming ill. Findings: a) During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 18 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 18's diagnoses included sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Unusual Occurrence (an unexpected event or accident that results in significant harm or requires significant additional measures), which indicated the facility will report unusual occurrences that threaten the welfare, safety, or health of the resident, to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), within twenty four (24) hours, when one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), had a right shoulder fracture (broken bone).This failure delayed the investigation by the CDPH and placed Resident 1 and other residents in the facility at risk for neglect and abuse.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness), following cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke, a type of stroke caused by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to:1). Assess and investigate Resident 1's right arm pain when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) reported to a Charge Nurse.2). Investigate the note posted by a family member (FM) in Resident 1's room reminding the staff to be mindful when caring and repositioning Resident 1's right arm because of the pain. 3). Investigate when the family member notified the facility on 3/17/2026 regarding the resident's right shoulder fracture (broken bone) on 3/15/2026.4). Implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Accidents and Incidents - Investigation and Reporting which indicated the nurses and / or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the incident. The Nurse Supervisor, charge nurses and / or the department director or supervisor shall complete a report of incident form and submit the original to the Director of Nursing Services within 24 hours of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered care plan, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), who had mobility deficit, requiring assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and who had complained of right arm pain. This deficient practice had the potential to result in providing poor quality patient care and had the potential to affect in maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of the resident.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness), following cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke, a type of stroke caused by a blocked blood vessel [thrombosis or embolism], leading to tissue death [necrosis] in the brain due to lack of oxygen) affecting right dominant side (right-side of the body), other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). consistent with professional standards or practice. The facility failed to ensure: 1). Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 3 documented on a Stop and Watch form (a written statement of the situation), Resident 1's constant complains of right arm pain during movement and when it was reported to the charge nurse.2). Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 properly assessed Resident 1's right arm pain after noting the family member's (FM) posted instruction in Resident 1's room reminding staff to be mindful when touching, moving or repositioning the resident's right arm, because of the pain.3). Implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled Pain Assessment and Management, which indicated to assess the potential for pain, recognize the presence of pain, identify the characteristics of pain, address the underlying causes of the pain, develop and implement approaches to pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 1 and 2 implemented the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an approach to the use of personal protective equipment [PPE] to decrease transmission of multidrug resistant organisms [MDROs] when contact precautions do not apply) when providing care to two of five sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3). This deficient practice had the potential to the transmission of disease causing MDROs to other residents, staffs and visitors in the facility, affecting the health conditions and causing infections, hospitalization or death. Findings: 1). During an observation on 3/26/2026 at 10:00 a.m., an isolation cart and an EBP sign were observed at the entrance of Resident 2's room. CNA 1 entered Resident 2's room without wearing an isolation gown (a personal protective equipment) and assisted Resident 2 with ADL care. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure titled Charting and Documentation, for one of three residents (Resident 1) when:Respiratory Therapist (RT 1) wrote a progress note on 1/6/2026 at 4:15 p.m. for an event that occurred at 4:23 p.m Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) did not document his respiratory assessment findings in Resident 1's medical record.These failures resulted in Resident 1's medical record being inaccurate and incomplete. These failures had the potential to result in delayed identification of Resident 1's change in condition, and delayed interventions.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), tracheostomy (an opening in the neck into the windpipe for direct and improved airflow) and respirator (ventilator- a medical device to help…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Going Out On Pass (OOP-short term leave from the facility) Policy, for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2 and 3) by failing to:1.Ensure Residents 1, 2 and 3's OOP orders indicated whether the Residents may leave OOP without a responsible person and/or indicated the length of time the Resident may be OOP. 2.Ensure Resident 3 was assessed before and after the Resident went OOP. 3.Ensure Residents 1 and 3 had a responsible person to accompany the Residents while OOP when the physician did not specify whether the Residents may leave OOP without a responsible person. These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1, 2, and 3's safety and well-being while OOP. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included polyneuropathy (damage to nerves outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P), titled Bed-Holds and Returns and the Transfer/Discharge Documentation, by not providing the written Notice of Discharge and the written Notice of Bed-hold (to save the bed for 7 days) upon the residents' transfer to a general acute care hospital (GACH 1), for three of four residents (Residents 1, 2 and 3) or their family representatives. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 and their representatives not knowing their rights. Findings: 1). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH 1) on 4/28/2025. The admission Record indicated Resident 1 had a history of tracheostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow air to be administered through the neck, common for people with breathing problems), gastrostomy (a surgical opening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Bed-Holds (when a nursing home holds [reserve] a bed for seven (7) days) when the resident goes to the hospital) and Returns, by failing to hold the sub-acute bed (specialized unit of the facility providing care and services to residents with tracheostomy [surgical opening in the neck area for breathing]) for 7 days, when one of four residents' (Resident 1), was sent to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not re-admitted back to the facility within the 7-day bed-hold period. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in room [ROOM NUMBER]A, in Sub-acute unit on 12/31/2024. The admission Record indicated Resident 1 had a history of tracheostomy ([trache] a surgical opening in the neck for breathing), gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 5) received respiratory care and services according to professional standards, by failing to ensure: 1.Resident 4 ' s ventilator (a medical device to help a person breathe when they are unable to do so on their own) alarm (visual and/or audible warnings that alert caregivers to changes in a patient's condition or the ventilator's status) located outside Resident 4 ' s room (secondary alarm) was turned on in a timely manner. 2. Resident 5 ' s ventilator alarm located at the bedside (primary alarm) was set to high. These failures had the potential to result in a delay in care and services, respiratory compromise and death for Residents 4 and 5. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 4 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 4 ' s diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure two out of six sampled residents (Resident 67 and 147) nasal cannulas (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) were not dated and labeled. This deficient practice of not dating and labeling the nasal cannulas placed Residents 67 and 147 at risk for respiratory infection (an infection affecting the nose, throat, sinuses, airways, and lungs). 2. Ensure there were not two bags of opened and emptied bottles of water, sparkling water, iced coffee, fruit juice, and energy drinks in the laundry room next to a washing machine. This deficient practice had the potential for attracting pests to the laundry room. a. During a review of Resident 67's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 67 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 9) received supervision while smoking This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 9 being injured while smoking. 2. Ensure the entrance and exit doors were monitored to prevent the resident from leaving the facility unattended. This deficient practice had the potential for a resident to sustain an accidental injury while outside the facility's premises without staff supervision. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and congestive heart failure ([CHF]-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently). During a review of Resident 9's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/29/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 9 has the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1. Provide appropriate intravenous (IV- a long thin catheter in the vein to deliver medications or fluids) care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 87) by not changing the IV dressing every 7 days and not changing the IV site every 72 hours as ordered. 2. Ensure one of three sampled resident's (Resident 5) intravenous line ([IV]- a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein) site was labeled with the date/time of insertion. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 87 and Resident 5 to experience complications associated with having an IV. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 87's Face Sheet, it indicated Resident 87 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), and urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract). During a review of Resident 87's Order Summary Report, it indicated Resident 87 was prescribed Zosyn (an antibiotic) 3.375 grams (gm- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 69) Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment ([POLST] - a form designed to improve patient care by creating a portable medical order form that records patients' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the event of a medical emergency) was completed. This deficient practice of not completing the POLST for Resident 69 placed the resident at risk for not receiving goods and services based on their needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 69's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 69 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 69's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), respiratory failure (when the body's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a comfortable sound level, when staff was setting off the alarm when exiting the emergency door for two of 19 sampled residents (Residents 33 and 56). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 33 and 56 feeling annoyed and not being able to sleep or rest. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, dated 2/20/2025, the admission Record indicated, Resident 33 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 33's diagnoses included cellulitis (a skin infection that causes swelling and redness) to right and left leg, chronic kidney disease (CKD-condition which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling. A review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool), dated 12/24/2024, the MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 69) was accurately assessed for smoking. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to not develop and implement an individualized plan of care for resident 69. Findings: During a review of Resident 69's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 69 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 69's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), respiratory failure (when the body's respiratory system is unable to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide properly), and diabetes mellitus ([DM] -a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 69's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/8/2024, the H&P indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a care plan (the process of identifying a patient's needs and facilitating holistic care and ensures collaboration among nurses, patients, and other healthcare providers) was formulated for one of 19 sampled residents (Residents 76). This failure placed Resident 19 at risk of not having his care needs met. Findings: During a review of Resident 76's admission Record, dated 2/20/2025, the admission Record indicated, Resident 76 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 76's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious condition where the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), and seizures (a sudden,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 69) had a revised care plan (a previously established care plan for a patient that has been updated to reflect changes in their condition, needs, or response to treatment) to wear protective gear while smoking. This deficient practice had the potential to place the Resident at risk burns. Findings: During a review of Resident 69's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 69 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 69's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), respiratory failure (when the body's respiratory system is unable to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide properly), and diabetes mellitus ([DM] -a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 6) had heel protectors on while lying in bed. This had the potential of Resident 6 not receiving the appropriate care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 6's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction that occurs due to an imbalance of chemicals in the blood), respiratory failure (when the body's respiratory system is unable to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide properly), and diabetes mellitus ([DM] -a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 6's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/30/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 6 had limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 6) staff followed physician orders. This deficient practice had the potential to cause a delay in Resident's 6 plan of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 6's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction that occurs due to an imbalance of chemicals in the blood), respiratory failure (when the body's respiratory system is unable to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide properly), and diabetes mellitus ([DM] -a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 6's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/30/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 6 had limited capacity. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a bottle of Pro-Stat (a liquid protein supplement) and drawer in medication cart #4 was free of a sticky substance. This deficient practice had the potential to result in cross contamination (movement of bacteria from one place to another) that could result in an infection. Findings: During a current observation and interview on 2/20/2025 at 7:41 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 at medication cart #4, a bottle of Pro-Stat was found with a large amount of sticky spillage down the container. There was a plastic bag with another medication stuck to the Pro-Stat bottle. Pro-Stat was spilled inside the medication drawer. LVN1 stated, It's sticky, staff are supposed to clean it. LVN1 stated there could be cross contamination that can lead to infection. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Medications, dated April 2007, the P&P indicated the nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining storage and preparation areas in a clean and sanitary manner.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 71) had a Depakote level (a blood test to check the amount of this drug in your body) completed on the first Monday of every month per physician's order. Depakote is a drug given to control seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 71 not receiving appropriate dosing of his Depakote. Findings: During a review of Resident 71's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and seizure. During a review of Resident 71's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/3/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 71 had mental retardation and is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 87) had documentation related to the insertion and discontinuation of the intravenous (IV- a long thin catheter in the vein to deliver medications or fluids) line. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 87. Findings: During a review of Resident 87's Face Sheet, it indicated Resident 87 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), and urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract). During a review of Resident 87's Order Summary Report, it indicated Resident 87 was prescribed Zosyn (an antibiotic) 3.375 grams (gm- a unit of measurement) to be administered via IV every 8 hours for sepsis for 10 days until 9/18/2024. During a review of Resident 87's IV Administration Record, dated 9/8/2024, an order indicated for the nurse staff to ensure the IV…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for ankle-foot orthotic (a device to provide support and stability to the ankle and foot, correct foot and ankle deformities, improve walking and mobility, reduce pain and inflammation, and control muscle spasms) device, before being implemented to one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 wearing ankle foot orthosis without an order. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk to receive inappropriate care resulting in skin breakdown and joint complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 1 had a history of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage). During a review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure the physician's order to apply buddy strap (a hook and loop straps used to treat injured fingers by taping them to an uninjured finger) to one of three residents (Resident 1), were implemented for nine (9) days (from 1/21/2025 through 1/29/2025). The failure had the potential to delay the healing of Resident 1's right index finger (finger next to thumb) fracture (broken bone) and placed the resident at risk for complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 1 had a history of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/3/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had a history of hemiplegia (total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one of 4 sampled residents by failing to: 1.Provide adequate supervision and implement interventions for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1), who verbalized wanting to go Out on Pass ([OOP] short term leave from facility) and had previous episodes of leaving the facility without an Out on Pass ([OOP] short leave from facility) physician ' s order. 2. Implement Resident 1 ' s Care Plan to monitor Resident 1 ' s behavior symptoms such as wandering, inappropriate response to verbal communication and document. 3.Accurately assess Resident 1 ' s Elopement Risk 4.Ensure the facility ' s exit doors alarms were activated and monitored. These failures resulted in Resident 1 eloping (the act of leaving a facility unsupervised and without prior authorization) and placed other residents at risk for eloping which could lead to accidents, injuries, and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was admitted in the facility with cellulitis (skin infection caused by bacteria) of the right and left lower limb (leg) received care and services to meet the resident ' s needs by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 received wound treatment as ordered by the physician. 2. Complete a weekly assessment of Resident 1 ' s wound. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for worsening, complications, and poor healing of the resident ' s skin condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue ( bacterial, viral, or fungal – that enters any break in the skin and invade the subcutaneous tissue), lymphedema (swelling caused by a buildup of fluid in the body between the skin and muscle), and venous stasis dermatitis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure all doors that lead to the outside of the facility had an alarm to prevent one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), who was assessed as a high risk for elopement, (leaving the health care facility unsupervised and undetected) from leaving the facility without staff knowledge. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to be injured while out of the facility premises without supervision from staff. Findings: a. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), and toxic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by exposure to toxic substances). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a standardized assessment and care planning tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to document and monitor three of 3 residents' (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) meal intake percentage. This deficient practice increased the risk that Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 could have experienced undernourishment, which could result in weight loss, medical complications leading to hospitalization. Findings: a). A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat particles (lipids) in the blood), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (The lack of sufficient energy or protein to meet the body ' s metabolic demands), and iron deficiency anemia (a condition in which blood lacks adequate healthy red blood cells). A review of Resident 1 ' s history and physical (H&P) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 12 sampled residents (Resident 2, 69, and 23) medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directive's (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were discussed and written information were provided to the residents and/or responsible parties. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents not to receive necessary information, treatments and care regarding the end of life issues according to their wishes. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), and contracture of muscle (a permanent tightening of the muscles and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure adequate supervision was provided to a resident who was at risk for falls for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 95). 2. Ensure personal extension cord was free of electrical safety hazards for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 71). 3. Ensure the main ventilator was plugged into an emergency back-up power outlet (red plug outlet) instead of an extension cord for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 68). Findings: a. During an observation on 1/25/24 at 10:24 a.m. at Resident 95's bedside, it was noted there was no padded mat on the floor for protection if a fall occurred. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 10:31 a.m. with LVN1, LVN1 stated when a resident is at risk for a fall the facility places a padded floor mat, ensures the bed is in a low position, and ensures the call light is within reach. LVN1 stated the resident could get out of bed and be injured if there is no padded mat. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 10:36…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to label the oxygen tubing weekly in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure, for two of three sampled residents (Resident 12 nad 71). This deficient practice had the potential for infection due to prolonged use of the oxygen tubing. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 12's admission record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonitis (inflammation of lung tissue), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where you don't have enough oxygen in the tissues in your body), and ischemic heart disease (a heart damage caused by poor blood flow to your heart). During a review of review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] resident assessment and care screening tool) assessment, dated 12/15/2023, the MDS indicated, Resident 12's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) summary score was 11 (moderate cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy consultant recommendation to consider discontinuing PRN (as needed) psychotropic (drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) was acknowledged and acted upon for two out of five sampled residents (Resident 86, Resident 2 and Resident 43). This deficient practice for failing to respond to recommendation from the pharmacy consultant places Residents at risk for unnecessary medication administration. Findings: During a review of Resident 86's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 86 on 8/7/2023 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), type 2 diabetes mellitus (mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood sugar is too high), and cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient dietetic service oversight when the dietary supervisor (DS) was overseeing three departments (housekeeping, maintenance, and dietary services) all at the same time, while registered dietitian worked on a consulting basis. This deficient practice resulted on the oversight of food safety, sanitation, and storage of food in the kitchen, lack of in-services and evaluation of competency of [NAME] 1 and [NAME] 2 on how to validate (verify that the measuring instrument continues to be suitable for its purpose) and calibrate (test its accuracy in a substance with a known temperature and adjust the thermometer to match that temperature) thermometer and had a potential to affect 77 out of 92 residents who received food from the facility. Findings: During the annual recertification survey from 1/23/2024 to 1/26/2024, multiple issues surrounding the delivery of dietetic services were unmet in relation to: a. The oversight of food safety, sanitation, and storage of food in the kitchen (cross reference F812). b. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff were following the facility's policy when checking the accuracy and calibrating the thermometer. 2. Facility failed to ensure [NAME] 1 and [NAME] 2 has the competency to validate and calibrate thermometer. These failures had a potential to result the temperatures of food are not accurate resulting to possible food borne illnesses (an illness caused by contaminated food and beverages) or growth of bacteria in food in 77 of 92 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Finding: During an observation on 1/24/2024, at 11:34 a.m., in kitchen, observed [NAME] 1 and [NAME] 2 cleaning the thermometer with alcohol wipes. [NAME] 1 placed the manual thermometer stem into a glass of water with ice floating. The tip of thermometer was touching the bottom of the glass and resulted to temperature of 32 degree Fahrenheit. [NAME] 1 placed all the seven digital thermometer in the glass with the stems touching the bottom and side of the glass and the thermometer had a result of 42, 8,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were handled, prepared, and stored in a manner that prevented foodborne illness by ensuring to: 1. Remov expired items from the walk-in refrigerator. 2. Keep food boxes off the floor. 3. Check refrigerator and freezer temperatures as scheduled. 4. Maintain the ice machine for cleanliness. 5. Keep the ice scoop outside the ice chest to prevent contamination. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross- contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness in 77 out of 92 medically compromised residents who received food and ice from the kitchen. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/23/2024, at 9:06 a.m., with [NAME] 1, inside the walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen, the following were observed: Beef inside a red bin labeled as beef prep (preparation) dated 1/19/2024 and a use by date of 1/22/2024. Pork bacon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two medications were not left at a resident's bedside table, who was not capable of self-administering oral medications, for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 71). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unsafe medication application or omission of medication. Findings During observation, on 1/23/2024, at 9:55 a.m., Resident 71 was lying in bed watching a movie on his tablet. A medicine cup containing 5 mL of a yellow liquid was observed on the bedside table in front of the resident, along with a plastic cup of a pink liquid with powder at the bottom of it. During an interview with the resident at the same time, he stated the liquid was medication for protein and wound healing and the pink drink with powder at the bottom of the cup was for protein. During a review of the admission record indicated Resident 71 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 23 and 35) call light device was placed within reach at all times. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in or in an inability for the residents to obtain necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 35 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 35's diagnoses included epilepsy (a chronic disorder of the brain characterized by recurrent brief episodes of involuntary movement that may involve a part of the body or the entire body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease that causes blocked airflow from the lungs), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents (Residents 36 and Resident 153) chose one of 3 billing options on the facility's SNF Beneficiary Notification form when there was a change in Medicare coverage related to skilled nursing needs. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to be unaware of their financial responsibilities for the services received at the facility, and for related standard claim appeal rights. Findings: a. During a review of the admission record indicated Resident 36 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission date of 6/22/2023 with diagnoses that included, but not limited to toxic encephalopathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes and dementia. During a review of Resident 34's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form (Medicare beneficiaries have specific rights and protections related to financial liability and the right to appeal a denial of Medicare services under the Fee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had physical restraint were evaluated regularly and less restrictive measures were attempted for one of two sampled residents (Resident 31). This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for unnecessary prolonged use of restraint that could lead to decline in physical functioning and residents not being treated with respect and dignity. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 31 on 7/7/2022 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), gastrostomy tube placement (a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach), and Parkinson (a motor syndrome that manifests as rigidity, tremors, and slowness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review. The facility failed to provide accurate information in the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] resident assessment and care screening tool) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 31). This deficient practice had the potential to result inaccurate care and services for Resident 31 due to inappropriate MDS care screening and assessment tool practices. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 31 on 7/7/2022 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), gastrostomy tube placement (a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach), and Parkinson (a motor syndrome that manifests as rigidity, tremors, and slowness of movement). During a review of Resident 31's Order Summary Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 sampled residents (Residents 43), change of condition PASRR was submitted to the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). Resident 43's level one PASRR was not resubmitted after a change of condition to ensure the resident was re-evaluated. This failure had the potential to cause harm due to not receiving care and services in the most appropriate setting for the resident's needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 43's diagnoses included pulmonary edema (a condition in which fluid builds up in the lungs, making it difficult to breathe), acute and chronic respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar), generalized anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate and consistent activities of interest for one of one sampled resident (Resident 66). This deficient practice had the potential to decrease Resident 66's social interaction, sense of belongings, depression, and emotional health. Findings: During a review of Resident 66'2 admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including legal blindness (unable to see because of injury, disease, or congenital condition), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood sugar is too high). During a review of Resident 66's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/29/2023, the H&P indicated, Resident 66 can make needs known but can not make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 66s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] resident assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 31) who received gastrostomy tube feedings ([GT] tube surgically placed into the stomach for nutrient and medication administration) to ensure that feeding formula was labeled in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had a potential for feeding tube formula to be outdated that could cause side-effect to resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 31 on 7/7/2022 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), Parkinsonism (a motor syndrome that manifests as rigidity, tremors, and slowness of movement), and gastrostomy tube placement. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label one medication with an open date for a floor stock or house supply in medication cart two. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the prolonged use and loss of strength of the floor stock medication. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/25/2024 at 9:50 a.m. with Registered Nurse 2 (RN 2) at medication cart two. RN 2 stated there was no open date for one bottle of loratadine (antihistamine). RN 2 stated she will change the bottle to a new one and put a date. RN 2 stated it is important to put the date on the bottle once you opened because the medication can lose its potency. During an interview on 1/25/2024 at 12:10 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated our policy for the house supply medications or floor stock was to label with an opened date and we have to discard the medication if there is no documented opened date so residents don't get expired medications. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Labels,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the dialysis (a treatment that removes wastes and extra fluid from your blood) access type for one of two sampled residents (Resident 15). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 15 to receive misinformation and not receiving the appropriate care and services and poor continuity of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 15 on 12/20/2023 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidney cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood sugar is too high), and cerebrovascular disease (group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain) with hemiplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee ([QAPI] takes a systemic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents and families, and all nursing home caregivers in practical and creative problem solving) failed to identify facility and resident care issues, and develop and implement appropriate plans of action which included to evaluate measures to maintain resident supervision practices by having the dietary supervisor (DS) overseeing maintenance, dietary and housekeeping concerns. This had the potential to negatively impact resident safety, care and outcomes. Findings: During an interview on 1/26/2024, at 12:15 p.m., with the registered dietitian (RD), the RD stated she comes once or twice a week on a consulting basis. The RD stated the facility needed a full time DS at least 32 to 40 hours a week. The DS was in charge overseeing the kitchen, food, and training staff. During an interview on 1/26/2024, 1:14 p.m., with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures by: 1. Failing to ensure staff was performing proper hand hygiene when going and out of a resident room. This deficient practice had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection and hospitalization. Findings: During an observation on 1/23/2024 at 3:38 p.m. in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 was observed entering the resident's room without performing hand hygiene. LVN 3 went to check on the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] touching the curtain next to the resident and pressed the button to turn off the call light. LVN 3 exited the room without performing hand hygiene. During an interview on 1/23/2024 at 3:39 p.m. with LVN 3, LVN 3 stated hand hygiene is to be performed when you enter a room, soiled hands, when you touch resident's items or resident, and when you exit a room. LVN 3 stated hand hygiene is important as you can transfer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement reporting guidelines of All facilities Letter (AFL) 23-09, dated 1/18/2023, by failing to report the facility's COVID-19 (an infectioous disease caused by the SAR-CoV-2 virus) outbreak (at least one confirmed case of COVID-19 who had resided in the facility for at least 7 days) for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) District Office. This deficient practice resulted in the delay of the investigation by CDPH and had the potential to spread COVID-19 infection to the residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record dated 12/14/23, the admission ' s record indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure), acute upper respiratory infection (a contagious infection of your upper respiratory tract), and cerebral infraction (occurs because of disrupted blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents in rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 34, 35, 36, 38, and 40 had at least 80 sq ft of living space.This deficient practice had the potential to prevent residents from moving around the room freely or store personal items. Staff may also have difficulty providing care due to limited space.Findings:During a review of the Client Accommodation Analysis, dated 3/18/2026, the analysis indicated the facility's rooms had the following room measurements:room [ROOM NUMBER] is 235 sq ft with 3 beds (78.3 square (sq) feet (ft) per resident)room [ROOM NUMBER] is 235 sq ft with 3 beds (78.3 sq ft per resident)room [ROOM NUMBER] is 235 sq ft with 3 beds (78.3 sq ft per resident) 3 room [ROOM NUMBER] is 235 sq ft with 3 beds (78.3 sq ft per resident) room [ROOM NUMBER] is 235 sq ft with 3 beds (78.3 sq ft per resident) room [ROOM NUMBER] is 235 sq ft with 3 beds (78.3 sq ft per resident) room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure residents in rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 34, 35, 36, 38, and 40 had at least 80 sqft of living space. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents not being able to move around freely or store personal items. Staff may also have difficulty providing care due to a lack of space. Findings: During a review of the Client Accommodation Analysis, dated 2/19/2025, the analysis indicated the facility had the following room measurements: Room # # of beds Floor square footage 1 3 235 2 3 235 3 3 235 4 3 235 5 3 235 6 3 235 7 3 235 8 3 235 9 3 235 10 3 235 11 3 235 12 3 235 13 3 235 14 3 235 15 3 235 16 3 235 17 3 235 18 3 235 19 3 235 20 2 245 21 3 235 22 2 245 23 3 235 24 2 245 25 2 245 26 2 245 27 2 245 28 2 245 29 2 245 30 2 245 31 2 245 32 2 245 33 2 245 34 3 235 35 3 235 36 3 235 37 1 244 38 2 235 39 3 244 40 3 244 During a review of the Room Variance Waiver…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms in the following rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 34, 35, 36, 38, and 40. The failure to provide adequate space created the potential for adversely affecting the residents' quality of life, safety, and health, and the provision of care who occupied rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 34, 35, 36, 38, and 40. Findings: During the entrance conference on 1/23/20 at 9:13 A.M., the facility's administrator (ADM) stated the facility had requested and submitted a room waiver for the variance. The ADM provided a copy of room waiver request letter to continue with the waiver request, dated 11/13/23, indicating the resident rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, and 40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSB LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/20/2015 |
| JACARANDA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BRADSHAW, PETER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/07/2023 |
| ELSNER, ERIC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/20/2015 |
| KIRKWOOD, JARED | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| ORGILL, CRAIG | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| PARTI, RAJESH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/20/2015 |
| PARTI, SHRUTY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/20/2015 |
| PAXMAN, MARCUS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/06/2020 |
| BRADSHAW, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BRADY, VERN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/26/2020 |
| CASE, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/26/2020 |
| CASLMON, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| THOMPSON, STEPHEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| FORTIN, WAYNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/19/2025 |
| JARDIEL, JOSIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/22/2023 |
| KOTULA, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/09/2025 |
| PRASAD, RAJENDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2019 |
| ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| CCSB, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/26/2020 |
| EAST WEST BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2009 |
| MOSS ADAMS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2009 |
| WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCAITION | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2019 |
| JURADO, FRANK | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555340. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.