Hillcrest Heights Healthcare Center
4033 Sixth Avenue Ext, San Diego, CA 92103 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (619) 297-4086 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.33 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.87 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.0%CMS range 41.8–65.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.4–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.4–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a high risk elopement resident (1) from leaving the facility unnoticed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure transfer safety coordination was in place when the facility did not ensure the front entrance was secured and monitored in a manner that prevented the resident from leaving the facility unnoticed.As a result, Resident 1 eloped from the facility and required evaluation and observation in the emergency department (ED) after testing positive for methamphetamine (a highly addictive stimulant drug). The facility's failure to ensure safety coordination of transfer and monitoring resulted in Resident 1 not entering the facility and remained unattended in the community until located by emergency medical services. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia (memory loss due to poor circulation to the brain) and psychoactive substance abuse (misuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and coordinated discharge for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for an unsafe discharge and rehospitalization. Findings: During a record review on 5/23/25, Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included infective endocarditis (an infection of the heart), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. During a record review on 5/2325, Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 4/2/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven-day period) score of 13 points out of 15 possible points which indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition (pertaining to memory, judgement and reasoning ability). On 5/23/25 at 10:24 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 1 in his room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an effective discharge plan that ensured residents' discharge goals were identified and addressed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). As a result, Resident 2 felt rushed, unheard, and unprepared to transition to the next care setting, which affected the continuity of care. (Cross-reference: F-655, Baseline Care Plans) Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), per the admission Record. A record review of the facility's census and list of residents scheduled for discharge was conducted. The facility indicated that Resident 2 will be discharged today [5/8/25]. On 5/8/25 at 12:35 P.M., Resident 2 was observed holding a cell phone and sitting on the transport wheelchair. Resident 2 stated that yesterday [5/7/25], he was told by the Social Service Director (SSD) that he would be discharged today [5/8/25}. Resident 2 stated he indicated his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for discharge (leaving the facility) was developed and implemented for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure increased the risk that the residents' wishes would not be honored. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aftercare following surgery, per the admission Record. On 5/8/25, a review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. Resident 1 was discharged from the facility on 4/18/25. There was no evidence that a discharge care plan was developed. On 5/8/25 at 11 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). The SSD stated that a care plan should have been done on admission. Resident 1 did not have a discharge care plan and the facility should have ensured the resident was discharged according to the plan. On 5/08/25 at 12:55 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview and record review, the facility failed to (1) Notify the physician of the change of condition [rashes on the head] and monitor skin changes for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) and (2) Thoroughly assess and document Resident 3's condition following an unwitnessed fall. As a result, Resident 3 experienced delayed care, and the medical record did not accurately reflect the resident's condition, potentially impacting their health and safety. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (abnormal blood pressure), per the admission Record. A review of Resident 3's medical record was conducted. Per the Shower Sheet, dated 1/25/25, Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 documented Resident 2 had rashes on top of the head and above the forehead. There was no documented evidence that the physician was notified of the rashes or monitoring. Per the Progress Notes, dated 1/26/25 at 12:48 P.M., LN 2 documented that Resident 3 reported falling over a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) and failed to accurately and timely administer resident medications, when: 1. The Controlled Drug Records (accountability records) for four out of seven randomly selected residents (Residents 91, 86, 81, and 11) did not reconcile with the Medication Administration Records (MAR). This failure resulted in inaccurate accountability of controlled medications and the potential for accidental duplicate medication administration; and 2. The pharmacy did not provide Resident 30's Creon (brand name for pancrelipase, a medication for the pancreas) for 13 days. This failure could result in ineffective management of Resident 30's pancreatic insufficiency (inability to properly digest food due to pancreas dysfunction); and 3. Nursing staff failed to administer one medication as ordered by the prescriber for one out of seven residents (Resident 3).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 30) was free of a significant medication error when the facility did not give Creon (brand name for pancrelipase, a medication for the pancreas) to Resident 30 for 13 days. This failure resulted in Resident 30 having digestive symptoms and had the potential for worsening of her medical conditions. Findings: During an interview on 1/7/25 at 11:40 A.M., Resident 30 stated she had been discharged from the hospital two weeks ago with a new medication to take with meals for her pancreas. Resident 30 stated the hospital told her that her pancreas is failing and she needs to take a pancreas medication with breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks. Resident 30 verified she had not received her pancreas medication since her re-admission to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 30 stated since her re-admission, she noticed her stool had a worsened slimy film (also known as oily stool) than in the hospital. While rubbing her upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor resident food preferences listed on their resident's meal tickets, for five of 88 residents (Residents 1, 11, 49, 75, 151), reviewed for Resident Accommodations. This failure had the potential for resident's wishes, likes, and dislikes to be ignored. Findings: A lunch tray line observation was conducted in the kitchen on 1/8/25 at 12:10 P.M. The lunch meal consisted of oven crisp fish, sweet potato fries or brown rice, seasoned carrots, wheat roll, and cranberry crunch bar for dessert. 1. On 1/8/25 at 12:24 P.M., the lunch tray for Resident 1 was viewed and compared to the meal ticket. On the plate was fish, sweet potato fries, carrots, and a wheat roll. Listed on the meal tickets was a dislike for fish. The dislike was pointed out to staff after the plate had been covered and was getting ready to load on the metal wheeled food cart. The fish was removed by the cook and a cooked hamburger patty was place instead of the fish. An interview was conducted with Resident 1 on 1/9/25 at 9:08 A.M., in her room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and concise for two of two residents (Residents 30 and 71), reviewed for medical records accuracy when: 1. Resident 30's medication administration records (MARs) for Creon (brand name for pancrelipase, a medication for the pancreas) incorrectly indicated nine doses were administered between 12/25/24 - 1/9/25, when the medication was not administered and was unavailable; and 2. Resident 71's Dialysis Communication Form, post assessment listed a graft, (an internal surgically created connection between an artery and a vein that allows for hemodialysis treatment), instead of a Perma-cath, (a central line inserted into a main vein). These failures had the potential to result in inaccurate documentation of the resident's medical history and response to care. Findings: 1. During an interview on 1/7/25 at 11:40 A.M., Resident 30 stated she had been discharged from the hospital two weeks ago with a new medication to take…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and code one of three residents (Resident 50) on their annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool which is a Federal requirement to be submitted to Centers for Medicare and Medical Services {CMS}) who was identified as a smoker, when reviewed for Comprehensive Assessments. This failure had the potential for CMS to be unaware of Resident 50's current health status. Findings: Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on 4/24//23, with diagnoses which included dementia (progressive memory loss), per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted of Resident 50 on 1/6/25 at 10:10 A.M. Resident 50 was sitting outside in the smoking area with four other residents and a smoking monitor (a person who supervises smoking residents and hands-out smoking material). Resident 50 was wearing a protective smoking apron and holding a cigarette in his right hand. An observation was conducted of Resident 50 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety for one of three residents (Resident 50), identified as requiring a smoking apron while smoking, when reviewed for accidents. This failure had the potential for Resident 50's clothing to catch fire when smoking. Findings: Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (progressive memory loss), per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted of Resident 50 on 1/6/25 at 10:10 A.M. Resident 50 was sitting outside in the smoking area with four other resident's, including a smoking monitor (a person who supervises smoking residents and hands-out smoking material). Resident 50 was wearing a protective smoking apron and holding a cigarette in his right hand. An observation was conducted of Resident 50 on 1/7/24 at 8:10 A.M. Resident 50 was outside smoking with three other residents and a smoking monitor was present. Resident 50 was not wearing a protective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the posted menu. In addition, two of 88 residents (Resident 32 and 86) did not receive a fortified (foods with nutrients added to them), meal as ordered, when reviewed for nutritional needs. This failure had the potential for residents' nutritional needs to not be met. Findings: A lunch tray line observation was conducted in the kitchen on 1/8/25 at 12:10 P.M. The lunch meal consisted of oven crisp fish, sweet potato fries or brown rice, seasoned carrots, wheat roll, and cranberry crunch bar for dessert. 1. An observation was conducted on 1/8/25 at 1:23 P.M., during lunch tray line service in the kitchen. Some lunch trays contained white rice, in lieu of the sweet potato fries. The posted daily menu listed brown rice or sweet potato fries as being served with the fish. The cook was questioned about the white rice and went to view the posted menu. The cook stated It does indeed say brown rice. The cook stated, I did not look at it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of two residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to cause psychosocial harm because Resident 1 was unable to understand instructions and explanations of treatments and care that was being given by the facility staff. Findings: On 11/7/24 at 10:30 A.M. Resident 1 was interviewed with the assistance of a translator, (Resident 1 communicates primarily in Spanish). Resident 1 stated she had used the call light to ask for assistance when using a beside commode. Resident 1 stated she was unable to communicate in English with CNA 1, who had answered her call light to provide assistance. Resident 1 explained she was not able to use her hands to care for herself and was not able to communicate this in English to CNA 1. Resident 1 stated CNA 1 did not seem to understand her and started to shake the bedside commode and continued to give directions to Resident 1 in English. Resident 1 stated she was unsure about CNA 1's instructions. Certified Nursing Assistant 2 was interviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of missing money for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for Resident Rights under Grievances. As a result, Resident 1 ' s grievance was not promptly resolved and there was limited documentation to prove a thoughtful, meaningful investigation was conducted. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarct (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side, per the facility ' s admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 1 on 10/16/24 at 11:50 A.M., within the resident ' s room. Resident 1 was dressed, groomed, and sitting in a self-propelling wheelchair. Also observed in his room was a walker with an adjustable seat, next to the bed. Resident 1 stated about two months ago, he realized he would need to sell his truck, since he could no longer afford the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. As a result, Resident 1 had the potential to have further incidences of falls and/or injuries. Findings: A record review conducted on 9/23/24 indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included repeated falls, dementia (a condition that causes forgetfulness, confusion and memory loss), and polyneuropathy (a disease which causes weakness, numbness and pain). A review of the Progress Note dated 8/23/24 at 10 A.M. indicated Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall on 8/22/24. A review Resident 1 ' s Progress Note dated 8/29/24 at 10:10 A.M. indicated Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall on 8/27/24. On 9/23/24 at 12:55 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON stated the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) determined the root cause of the fall on 8/22/24 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify residents and/or the resident representatives when their care plans and physician ' s orders were updated to reflect exposure to Legionella bacteria (bacteria causing a serious lung disease) for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3). As a result, residents and/or the resident representatives were not aware of the risks involved in being exposed to Legionella bacteria. In addition, the residents and/or the resident representatives were not involved in their plan of care. Findings: On 2/6/24, an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to a reported facility ' s water testing positive for Legionella bacteria. During an interview and joint observation on 2/6/24, at 9:06 A.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), a sink at the nurse ' s station had a sign posted which indicated the sink was out of order. According to the ADON, the water from the sink tested positive for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary measures were met in the kitchen during dietary operations according to standards of practice when: 1. The [NAME] (CK) 1 did not perform hand hygiene consistently during food preparation, 2. The Dietary Aide (DA) crossed over from dirty station to clean station while working in the dishwashing station, and 3. [NAME] (CK) 1 and the Dietary Assistant Manager (DAM) were unable to verbalize the cool down process. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination that could lead to foodborne pathogens to come in contact with the residents' food and may cause food borne illness to the residents. The facility's census was 91. Findings: 1. On 1/30/24 at 10:19 A.M., an observation and an interview of CK 1 was conducted. CK 1 put on a pair of gloves, did not perform hand hygiene. CK 1 put two ladle full of hot butter to the milk, added some water, then poured the mixture into the mixer. CK 1 stated he was preparing for mashed potato. CK 1 added…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician regarding a significant weight loss for one of two sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 69) This deficient practice had the potential to delay necessary care and services to prevent Resident 69 to have further weight loss. Findings: Resident 69 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 1/30/24, at 8:32 A.M., Resident 69 was in bed with unfinished food on her breakfast tray. Resident 69 stated she did not feel well and covered herself with a blanket. During an interview on 1/30/24, at 3:41 P.M. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 31, CNA 31 stated Resident 69 was independent with eating, but only ate less than 50% of her meals. CNA 31 stated Resident 69's family brought in bottles of a nutritional supplement and water. On 1/31/24 at 8:30 A.M., Resident 69 was observed in bed with a full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean fan for Resident (5) to use. In addition, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one of two sampled residents (5) reviewed for homelike environment whose room had bubbling in the ceiling surface. As a result, Resident 5 did not feel comfortable with using a dirty fan or looking at a ceiling in need of repair. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record dated 8/20/18, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility from another nursing facility with diagnoses which included lung disease. During a review of Resident 5's history and physical (H&P) dated 11/19/19, the H&P indicated Resident 5 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. a. During an observation and interview with Resident 5 in her room on 1/29/24 at 10:16 A.M., Resident 5 was lying in bed, watching a movie. A standing fan was turned on with lint and brown substance (dust) in the fan blades and the blade guard. Resident 5 stated, Yes, I saw that, it was gross. No one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse when Resident 17 wandered into Resident 78's room. As a result, Resident 78 was punched on the right upper chest by Resident 17. FINDINGS: Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included but is not limited to chronic pain, falls and depression. A review of Resident 78's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), dated 12/26/23, indicated Resident 78's mental cognition, to understand and make herself understood. A review of Resident 78's History and Physical (H and P - a physician's assessment and examination of the resident), dated 12/22/23, indicated the resident has the capacity to understand and make her own decisions. Resident 17 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent re-admission date of 12/30/23. Resident 17's diagnoses include but is not limited to dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), falls and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit a PASARR Level 1 (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review- a federally required document to ensure residents are appropriately placed) when one resident, Resident 17, received a new mental health diagnosis while living in the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 17's mental health needs potentially being unmet. Findings: A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident's 17's diagnoses included other psychotic disorder not due to substance or known psychological condition (severe mental health disorder that causes abnormal thinking and perceptions not caused by drugs). Resident 17's original admission date was 5/19/2016. On 1/30/24 at 11:06 A.M., an interview and concurrent record review were conducted with the Case Manager (CM). The CM stated a new PASARR Level 1 was not completed after Resident 17 received a new psychiatric (mental illness) diagnosis. The CM stated the Minimum Data Set (MDS- ) nurse was responsible for updating the PASARR Level 1 for residents with a new mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level 1 (PASRR-- a federal requirement to prevent individuals with mental illness [MI], developmental disability [DD], intellectual disability [ID], or related conditions from being inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was accurately completed for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident 79) This failure resulted in the resident to not be appropriately evaluated through the PASARR process and had the potential for the facility to not be aware of possible services needed to address Resident 79's mental illness. Findings: Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] according to the facility's admission Record. Resident 79's psychiatric assessment dated [DATE] indicated diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental illness causing intense mood swings from one extreme to another) and schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder with combination of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident-centered care plans were developed for two of 25 sampled residents reviewed for care plans: 1. Resident 17 did not have a care plan to address his behavior of going into other residents' rooms. 2. Resident 79 did not have a care plan to address Resident 79's diagnosis of PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event). Cross reference F 699. These failures could potentially affect residents not receiving the proper treatment and care. This includes protection of other residents from Resident 17 and the prevention of potential triggers that will cause re-traumatization for resident 79. The facility did not ensure a care plan was developed for 2 residents related to PTSD and wandering. Findings: Resident 17 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent re-admission date of 12/30/23. Resident 17's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's range of motion (ROM-how far or stretch a part of body that can be moved around a joint) for one of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL-bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, toileting and eating). (Resident 48) This failure resulted in Resident 48 to have contractures (shortening of muscles and tendons, often leading to permanent deformity and stiffening of joints) of the left hand and left elbow. Findings: Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebrovascular disease (group of conditions affecting blood flow and blood vessels in the brain) affecting left dominant (left handed) side according to the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care to three of nine sampled residents (5, 14 and 75), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL, activities related to personal care). As a result, Resident 5, Resident 14, and Resident 75's health and wellbeing were at risk. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record dated 8/20/18, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility from another nursing facility with diagnoses which included lung disease and needed assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 5's history and physical (H&P) dated 11/19/19, the H&P indicated Resident 5 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 11/7/23, the MDS indicated Resident 5's brief interview for mental status (BIMS, ability to recall) score was 2, which meant Resident 2's cognition was severely impaired. The functional abilities section of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) was administered per physician's order for one of two sampled residents (1) reviewed for respiratory therapy. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to develop oxygen toxicity. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record dated 10/31/18, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility from acute care hospital with diagnoses which included respiratory failure. During a review of Resident 1's history and physical (H&P) dated 6/28/23, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During an observation of Resident 1 in her room on 1/29/24 at 10:40 A.M., Resident 1 was lying in bed, and did not respond when her name was called. Resident 1 wore a nasal cannula (tubing) connected to an oxygen concentrator (machine that delivers oxygen). The concentrator flow meter was set at 3 - 3.5 Liters per minute (LPM). The oxygen concentrator was observed 10 times on 1/29/24 through 1/30/24. Resident 1's O2 concentrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify one of two residents reviewed for Trauma Informed Care (TIC - an intervention and organization approach that focuses on how trauma may affect an individual's life and his or her response to behavioral health), received care and services in accordance with professional standards when Resident 79's PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event) was not identified and addressed by the healthcare providers. This failure resulted in the facility's inability to identify possible triggers that could result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or feelings related to the past traumatic experience). Findings: Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including PTSD according to the facility's admission Record. During observation and interview with Resident 79 on 1/30/24, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a routine dental hygiene appointment for one resident, Resident 11. This failure resulted in Resident 11's dental needs being unmet. Findings: A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 11 had diagnoses including muscular dystrophy (a condition marked by progressive weakening of the muscles) and need for personal care. On 01/29/24 at 10:16 A.M., an observation of Resident 11's teeth was made. Resident 11's teeth had visible discoloration and her gums were reddened. Resident 11 stated, I have not seen a dentist in a long time. On 1/31/24 at 1:35 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the CM had the information regarding dental appointments. On 2/1/24 at 3:12 P.M., an interview and concurrent record review were conducted with the Case Manager (CM). The CM stated a Dental Progress Note dated 9/12/23 by Medical Doctor (MD) 11 indicated, Patient overdue for hygiene. A review of a Progress Note dated 1/31/24 by MD 11 indicated, There is evidence of coronal loss (enamel on the exposed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to follow infection control practices when a Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, did not consistently perform hand hygiene during wound treatment for one resident. This failure had the potential to spread germs and placed residents at risk for infections. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record dated 10/31/18, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility from acute care hospital with diagnoses which included stage four pressure ulcer (a bedsore affective muscle and bone). During a review of Resident 1's history and physical (H&P) dated 6/28/23, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During an observation of Resident 1 in her room on 1/29/24 at 10:40 A.M., Resident 1 was lying in bed, and did not respond when her name was called. On 1/30/24 at 3:24 P.M. an observation of a wound treatment performed by Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 on Resident 1's tailbone. LN 1 prepared supplies and placed them in a small tray. LN 1 asked assistance from Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3. LN 1 brought the supplies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor and re-evaluate antibiotic therapy prescribed for one resident, Resident 251. This failure had the potential for Resident 251 to receive the wrong antibiotic and or to develop antibiotic resistance. Findings: A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 251 had a diagnosis of abscess of mid-back (a collection of pus). On 2/1/24 at 9:06 A.M., an interview and concurrent record review were conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP) who stated (Resident 251) has had a purulent wound on his back and has been on Bactrim (an antibiotic most commonly used for treatment of urinary tract infections) for an extended time. No wound culture has been done here. It's important to make sure the antibiotic is correct for the organism to kill it fully and prevent resistance. No Infectious Diseases consultation has been done. The IP stated no organisms were identified for Resident 251's skin infection. The IP further stated he did not know the facility's policy for culturing skin infections. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to arrange transportation for 1 of 2 sampled residents (1) who should receive a hemodialysis (HD) treatment (a procedure done by a trained professional to remove waste and excess fluid from the body) as ordered by the physician. As a result, Resident 1 missed the HD treatment appointment, and Resident 1 had to be transferred to the hospital. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (kidneys were damaged and could not filter blood), per the admission Record. A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. Per the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], Resident 1 has a chair in the HD center on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Per the Progress Notes dated 11/22/23, Resident 1 returned to the facility after hospitalization with permacath (a device inserted into a blood vessel) for HD. Per the Order Summary Report, dated 11/23/23, Resident 1 had an appointment to receive HD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document sufficient preparation and orientation before discharge for 1 of 2 sample residents (1), when Resident 1, who has a diagnosis of Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfere with doing everyday activities) was transferred to an Independent Living Facility (ILF- a place where resident need no to assistance). As a result, Resident there was a potential for unsafe discharge. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia, and anxiety, per the facility's Face Sheet. A review of Resident 1's clinical record was conducted. Per the History and Physical, dated 7/13/23, Resident 1 could not make a decision. Per the Care Plan, dated 9/21/23, The staff was to coordinate discharge plans with Resident 1 and the IDT (interdisciplinary team - a group of professionals from various disciplines collaborating to address the resident's needs). Per the Progress Notes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide showers and/or bed baths to three of four dependent residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3), reviewed for Activities of Daily (ADL). As a results, Resident 1, 2, and 3 had the potential for low self-esteem and possible skin infections. Findings: On 9/8/23, an unannounced visit was made to the facility in response to a complaint regarding resident hygiene. 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (disease of the brain), per the facility's admission Record. On 9/8/23, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed: According to the Minimum Data Set, (MD-a clinical assessment tool) dated 7/29/23, the cognitive score was listed as 00, indicating severely impaired cognition. The Functional Status, indicated one-person staff assistant was required for personal care, dressing, and eating. Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on 8/27/23 at 3 P.M., per the facility's nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote a safe, homelike environment when: 1. Sections of ceiling panels were missing in the front north and south hallways, and in the back south hallway, exposing wires, cables, and air conditioning vents; and 2. A shared male resident bathroom sink remained clogged for months; and 3. A shared female resident bathroom had missing linoleum on the floor, directly in front of the sink area. These failures had the potential of placing residents at risk for low self-esteem and living in an unkempt environment. Findings: 1. On 5/16/22 at 9:24 A.M., a ceiling panel approximately 2 x 4 feet was observed missing in the back south hallway. Wires, cables and an air conditioning vent were viewable from below. Three additional ceiling panels in the front north hallway, approximately 2 x 4 feet in size were missing. A ceiling panel outside the social service office, approximately 2 x 2 feet was secured with scotch tape and partially bulging down. An additional 2 x 4 ceiling panel outside the rehabilitation department was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff followed the recipes and therapeutic menus as planned and printed, according to facility policy when: 1. Kitchen staff did not follow the facility recipe for pureed (liquid food for easy swallowing) meats. 2. Kitchen staff did not use the correct utensil size for portion control. This failure had the potential to result in weight loss of residents due to reduced food intake, which could have resulted in a decline in activities of daily living, and may have further compromised their nutritional status. Findings: 1. On 5/16/22 at 11:37 A.M., an observation of the lunch tray line was conducted. CK 11 plated the food and was noted to be using the same size and colored serving utensils for each food item being served. On 5/16/22 at 11:58 A.M., and concurrent interview and record review with CK 11 was conducted. CK 11 stated he was not aware of the different colored portion controlled utensils and the cook spreadsheets listing the portion size for each diet. On 5/17/22 at 1:25 P.M., a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper, safe and sanitary food practices, storage, and sanitation requirements were met when: 1. Stored utensils, plate warmer and can opener had visible residue on them. 2. There was no air gap underneath the three-compartment sink. 3. The kitchen flooring had several areas of uneven surfaces and cracks. 4. A kitchen fan had thick black dust on its frame. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross-contamination that could lead to food-borne pathogens (disease-causing organism) to come in contact with the residents' food; and can cause food-borne illnesses to residents. Findings: 1. On 5/16/22 at 8:18 A.M., during the initial tour, an observation of the kitchen was conducted. A container with several different sizes of serving utensils had visible dried residual particles noted on its metal surface area. A plate warmer cabinet with a dozen plates in it, had bits and pieces of residual particles on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate safe infection control practices when: 1. Resident 72's dentures were left out on a shared shelf sink; and 2. A visitor was inside Resident 193's, designated yellow zone room (a room on isolation precautions for COVID-a highly transmittable virus), without wearing personal protective equipment (PPE); and 3. A urinary catheter bag (a flexible tube inserted into the body that drains urine into a drainage bag via gravity) was in contact with the floor for one of one resident, (Resident 12), reviewed for catheter care; and 4. An emergency eyewash station was not routinely cleaned and maintained. These failures had the potential for cross-contamination of microorganisms. Findings: 1. Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebrovascular disease (stroke) affecting the left side, per the facility's admission Record. On 5/16/22 at 9:19 A.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 72 in bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 92's needs and preferences were met. As a result, 1. Resident 92 did not have a working bathroom and 2. Resident 92's preferred in-room activity of watching television (TV) was not provided. Findings: Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's admission Record. 1. On 5/16/22 at 10:37 A.M., an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted. There were four male-occupied beds in the room. The restroom had an out of order sign on the door. A review of the Maintenance Log was conducted. On 4/27/22, the restroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was documented as toilet not working it's broken. On 5/17/22 at 8:12 A.M., an interview with Resident 92 was conducted. Resident 92 stated the restroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not working since he was transferred there about six or seven days ago. Resident 92 stated he had to use other resident's restrooms when he needed to go to the bathroom. Resident 92 also stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Follow a physician's order regarding the necessity of oxygen use for one of one resident (Resident 19) reviewed for oxygen administration; and 2. Develop and implement a person-centered plan of care for one of one resident (Resident 19), reviewed for limited ROM (range of motion). As a result, there was a potential for oxygen dependency and worsening contractures. Findings: 1. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebrovascular disease (stroke), per the facility's admission Record. On 5/16/22 at 8:42 A.M., and at 11:34 A.M., Resident 19 was observed in bed with oxygen being administered at two liters a minute via nasal canula (a clear, plastic flexible tube placed in the nostrils) connected to an oxygen condenser (a machine which delivers oxygen). On 5/17/22 at 8:17 A.M., 2:48 P.M., and 3:51 P.M. Resident 19 was observed in bed and receiving oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) services to one of three residents (Resident 19), reviewed for limited ROM. This failure had the potential for a decline in Resident 19's already limited ROM. Findings: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral vascular disease (stroke), per the facility's admission Record. On 5/16/22 at 8:42 A.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 19 in bed. Severe contractures (permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff), were visible to the fingers, wrist, and elbows. On 5/17/22, Resident 19's clinical record was reviewed. According to the physician's order, dated 3/23/22, .Active range of motion exercises of both upper extremities with RNA [restorative nurse's assistant-a CNA with specialized training], 3x/week one time a day every other day for Risk for decline in BUE ROM [bilateral upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident and hazards in the resident dining room when a microwave was placed into service and staff were unaware of its presence. This deficient practice had the potential to result in resident(s) risk for injury. Findings: On 5/17/22 at 10:32 A.M., an observation of the resident dining room was conducted. A microwave was observed to be in the corner of the resident dining room and was plugged into wall outlet on top of cabinet. On 5/17/22 at 10:51 A.M., an interview with CNA 21 was conducted. CNA 21 stated, the microwave was not in the resident dining room over the weekend. CNA 21 stated, the resident dining room had never had a microwave before. CNA 21 stated she noticed the microwave in the resident dining room this morning. CNA 21 further stated she had not received any in-services regarding the use of the microwave in the resident dining room. On 5/17/22 at 11:05 A.M., an interview with the DSD was conducted. The DSD stated, the microwave should not be in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff carried out the tasks of the food and nutrition services department in accordance with the standard of practice for the following kitchen competencies: 1. A kitchen DSW (dishwasher) did not know how to correctly test PPM concentration of the dishwashing solution with the chlorine test strip. 2. Kitchen staff did not know how to calibrate food thermometers. 3. The kitchen staff did not follow policy and procedure for fortifying resident diets. These failures had the potential to expose all residents who consumed food from the kitchen to practices associated with the transmission of food-borne illness. Findings: 1. On 5/16/22 at 9:50 A.M., an observation and interview of the DSW was conducted. The DSW pulled out a chlorine test strip from a container and dipped it in the dishwasher machine water; color change indicated a reading of 50-100 PPM. On 5/16/22 at 9:55 A.M., an interview with the CDM was conducted. The CDM stated the facility followed the contracted provider of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 74's mechanical bed was maintained in a safe condition. As a result, Resident 74, staff and visitors were exposed to a potential hazard, exposed electrical wires. Findings: Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) per the facility's admission Record. On 5/16/22 at 9:54 A.M., an observation of Resident 74 was conducted. The foot of the bed had missing panels on the control buttons. On 5/18/22 at 9 A.M., a concurrent observation of Resident 74's bed and interview with the DON was conducted. The DON stated there should not be any missing panels (covers for the electrical wiring of the bed controls) on Resident 74's bed. On 5/18/22 at 1:02 P.M., a concurrent observation of Resident 74's bed and interview with CNA 2 was conducted. CNA 2 stated there were no covers on some of the bed control buttons. CNA 2 stated someone could get electrocuted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASD6, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 12/18/2019 |
| JACARANDA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BRADSHAW, PETER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/07/2023 |
| ELSNER, ERIC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/18/2019 |
| KIRKWOOD, JARED | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/18/2019 |
| ORGILL, CRAIG | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/18/2019 |
| PARTI, RAJESH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/18/2019 |
| PARTI, SHRUTY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/18/2019 |
| PAXMAN, MARCUS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| CASLMON, TIMOTHY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| THOMPSON, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BRADY, VERN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| CASE, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BIRDJANDI, FARSCHAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/02/2022 |
| LUMAWAG, JOHANNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2022 |
| MOOKINI, DINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/20/2023 |
| BRADSHAW, JEFFREY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| JURADO, FRANK | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $873K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555630. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.