No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sierra Vista Healthcare

1715 South Cedar, Fresno, CA 93702 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (559) 237-8377 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Sep 20221 immediate-jeopardy citation$12,048 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Sep 2022
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $12,048 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-02)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4855 E Kings Canyon Rd
Pharmacy
Oportun0.8 mi
4817 E Butler Ave · (559) 827-4687 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1275 S Maple Ave · (559) 252-4444 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4670 E Butler Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4444 E Woodward Ave

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.8%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.9%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.3%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.8%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.3%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.752.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.281.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 251 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.4%CMS range 46.4–58.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 9.2–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.0–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
1.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
34.7%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 89.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-09)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2022-09-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) fulfilled her job responsibilities of daily kitchen oversight when: 1. The CDM failed to monitor daily kitchen operations to ensure a) food safety guidelines and standards of practice were followed; b) effective supervision of kitchen employees was conducted; c) proper preparation of pureed items; d) meal palatability and food was prepared to conserve nutrients; e) resident food preferences and intolerances were followed, and f) kitchen equipment was in safe working order (Cross reference to F812, F802, F803, F804, F806, and F908). 2. The CDM delegated daily departmental oversight responsibilities to [NAME] 1, who was not trained or qualified to perform the duties of a CDM. [NAME] 1 performed the CDM's job duties 40 hours weekly which included but not limited to; ordering food, visitation of residents for food preferences, attending care plan meetings, and providing instruction and guidance to food service employees. 3. [NAME] 2, who was responsible for preparing two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accident hazards (an unexpected injury or illness that occurred due to the resident ' s environment) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 who had dementia (condition of progressive loss of memory, language and other thinking abilities which requires increased supervision of the individual) and had a known behavior of moving around in the facility in the wheelchair independently, exited unsupervised to the rose garden outside. Resident 1 was found in an area of the rose garden exposed to the sun for an unknown amount of time on a day temperatures reached up to 108 degree Fahrenheit (unit of temperature measurement). This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining second- degree burns (a burn that affects the outer and middle layers of skin which results in blistering, swelling, redness and pain) on top of his scalp, right ear, posterior (back side) neck,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2022-09-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive systematic approach to ensure effective monitoring and maintenance of acceptable parameters of nutritional status for three of three sampled Residents (Residents 6, 34, and 79) when: 1. Resident 6 experienced a severe unplanned weight loss of 21 pounds (lbs.) equivalent to 11.8% of total body weight according to weights obtained from 5/13/22 to 8/8/22. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staff obtained weights, but Nursing Staff did not communicate the weight loss to the Physician or Registered Dietitian (RD) until 8/7/22. On 8/7/22, RD 1 noted a nine-pound weight loss (5.4%) for one month but did not note the 21 pound loss over 3 months. RD 1 did not communicate the weight loss or her recommendations to the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a healthcare approach that integrates multiple disciplines through collaboration). On 8/16/22, the IDT team noted an 11-pound weight loss from weights obtained from 7/6/22 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food and ice in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. The kitchen ice machine was observed to have several areas with a removable black substance when wiped with a white paper towel and was not sanitized according to manufacturer's directions.2. The kitchen's sanitizer solution was not the appropriate concentration to sanitize the food preparation area.3. A high calorie/protein nutritional supplement drink was observed in station two's refrigerator, open, and with no open date written on the carton. These failures had the potential to cause cross contamination (the process by which germs are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect) and the growth of microorganisms (a microscopic organism, especially a bacterium, virus, or fungus) that harbor foodborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease) of residents' food and ice which could lead to food-borne illness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional needs of the residents were met when the menus were not followed for three residents (Residents 7, 21, and 55) on a large portion diet when Resident 21 received three ounces of meatloaf (regular portion) instead of four ounces (large portion), Residents 7 and 55 received 4 ounces of meatloaf and should have received 6 ounces during lunch on 1/6/26. These failures had the potential to result in unintended weight loss, weakness, fatigue, or increased fall risk, and decreased quality of life.During a review of the facility's menu titled, Diet Spreadsheet dated Day: 17 - Tuesday [1/6/26], the Diet Spreadsheet indicated, .Large Portion.Lunch. Homestyle Meatloaf.Portion Size 4 oz (ounces). The Diet Spreadsheet indicated for the lunch meal the regular meatloaf portion size was 3 oz., the regular minced and moist meatloaf with thick gravy was a #8 scoop (4 ounces), the regular puree meatloaf was a # 8 scoop.During an observation of the lunch meal service on 1/6/26 at 12:38 p.m. in the kitchen,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for five of 22 sampled residents (Resident 4, 38, 58, 71, and 98) when:1. Resident 98's foley catheter drainage bag (a bag connected to a tube that is inserted into the urinary bladder to collect urine) was lying on the floor in his room. LVN 5 proceeded to enter his room and manipulate his catheter and did not put on a gown as specified by enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- standards in place in healthcare facilities to prevent the spread of infection) standards. This failure had the potential to cross contaminate (transfer of bacteria from one surface or object to another) Resident 98's catheter and LVN 6's clothing and cause them to be affected by and spread multi drug resistant organisms (MDRO-germs that are resistant to multiple antibiotics, making infections difficult to treat).2. Resident 4's nasal cannula (flexible tube with two prongs that fit inside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's privacy, dignity and respect when two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 95 and 14), foley catheter (an indwelling urinary catheter - a thin tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a bag) drainage bags were without a dignity cover (a bag used to the cover and hold the urine drainage and collection bag so it was not visible).This failure violated Resident 95 and Resident 14's privacy and had the potential to affect the self-esteem, self-worth, and quality of life of Resident 95 and Resident 14.Findings: During an observation on 1/06/2026 at 9:25 a.m. in Resident 95's room, Resident 95 was observed in bed sleeping, wearing a gown, lying on her left side. A urine bag was observed hanging on the left side of Resident 95's bed, uncovered, on the lower rail. During a review of Resident 95's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 96), who self-administered medication, stored their medication safely and securely at bedside when Resident 96 kept nine over the counter medications (OTC) on her bedside table.This failure resulted in Resident 96's OTC medications being accessible to residents, visitors and staff which could result in unauthorized access and unintended use of Resident 96's medication. During a review of Resident 96's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 1/8/26, the AR indicated Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (when the blood sugar levels in the body are too high), anemia (low levels of red blood cells), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (Resident 53) received a level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- evaluation for individuals suspected of having a Serious Mental Illness [SMI] or Intellectual/Developmental Disability [I/DD]/Related Condition [RC], triggered by a positive Level I screen, to determine if they need specialized services, ensuring placement in the least restrictive setting) evaluation by the designated entity to determine if SMI, ID/DD/RC conditions were present when Resident 53 had a PASARR level I screening result positive for SMI, and the facility did not ensure a PASARR level II screening was completed.This failure resulted in Resident 53 not receiving the required PASARR level II screening which had the potential to result in missed identification of specialized services needed and put Resident 53 at risk of delayed treatment.Findings:During an observation on 1/06/26 at 12:35 p.m., in the facility dining room, Resident 53 was observed sitting in a wheelchair, dozing off while staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP - a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 6), when Resident 6 had a known hernia (a sac protrusion of intestine or other tissue through a weakness or gap in the abdominal wall) and the condition was not addressed in the care plan. This failure placed Resident 6 at risk of experiencing severe and serious medical complications, and had the potential to cause unintentional weight loss, pain, and psychological harm when resident reported discomfort and bloating after eating, and the hernia was not addressed.During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR- a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 1/7/26, the AR indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 96) who self-administered medication at bedside when:Resident 96 was self-administering vitamin D3 (dietary supplemental providing vitamin D) 10,000 IU (International Units (IU- a unit of measurement for drug dosage), and guaifenesin extended-release (thins and loosens mucus in the airway) 1200 mg (milligrams- a unit of measurement for drug dosage) at bedside with no order.Resident 96 had an order for ferrous sulfate (iron supplement) 325 mg, but the order did not indicate it could be self-administered at bedside.This failure resulted in Resident 96 self-administering medication without complete, and accurate provider orders which could lead to inadequate monitoring, duplicate therapy and/or adverse effects.During a review of Resident 96's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly follow procedures for medication disposal when two of four medication carts inspected had denture containers being used as medication waste containers.This failure resulted in improper medication disposal during the medication pass and created the potential for medication diversion due to failure to dispose of medications at the required time.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/26 at 8:19 a.m. during Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5's medication pass, LVN 5 dropped a thiamine (a medicine used to protect the brain, nerves, and heart by preventing or treating vitamin deficiency) 100 milligrams (MG- a unit of measurement) tablet and then proceeded to place the dropped tablet in an unlabeled denture container. LVN 5 stated the denture container was used to discard medications during the med pass. LVN 5 stated all tablets, capsules, and liquids were discarded in the denture cup and then placed in the actual medication disposal container at the end of the shift. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label medications in accordance with accepted professional principles for one of two nasal spray medications located in station 1's medication cart 1 when the medication fluticasone propionate (nasal spray medicine used in the nose to reduce swelling and irritation) did not have patient identifier information on the bottle.This failure had the potential for cross-contamination (process of transferring germs and bacteria from one area to another) if another resident who was prescribed the same medication received Resident 102's unlabeled fluticasone propionate.Findings:During a review of the Resident 102's Order Summary Report (OSR), the OSR indicated Resident 102 was prescribed fluticasone propionate 50 MCG (Micrograms- a unit of measurement) to be given once a day in each nostril.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/26 at 2:40 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5, medication cart 1 in nurses station 1 was reviewed. The medication cart had Resident 102's fluticasone propionate nasal per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pureed (food that's been blended into a smooth pudding like consistency) food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for three of five sampled residents (Residents 5, 55, and 84) when Residents 5, 55, and 84's physician ordered pureed lunch meals on 1/6/26 and 1/7/26 did not hold shape or form. This failure had the potential to result in aspiration (food entering the airway or lungs), choking, and inadequate nutrition due to decreased flavor, which may result in weight loss and malnutrition.During a review of the facility's menu titled, Diet Spreadsheet dated Day: 17 - Tuesday [1/6/26], the Diet Spreadsheet indicated, . Pureed . (texture) . lunch pureed homestyle meat loaf, pureed potato gratin with thyme, and pureed steamed spinach .During an observation of the lunch meal service on 1/6/26 at 12:33 p.m. in the kitchen, Resident 5 and Resident 55's puree meat and vegetables were touching and unable to hold their shape or form when plated.During an interview on 1/6/26 at 10:36 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete, accurate, readily accessible and systematically organized for two of thirteen sampled residents (Resident 12 and Resident 10) when:1.Resident 12's consent for the use of bedside rails, was not completed, lacking the indication for use, who the consent was discussed with, licensed nurse signature, and dates of consent, were not present in the medical record.This failure had the potential for improper use of bedside rails and potential injury of resident. 2. Resident 10's Informed Consent for the use of Bed Rails, from 8/24/20-11/3/22, could not be located for over 24 hours and had to be retrieved from an off-site location, was not complete or accurate, and was being used for Resident 10's current bed rail order.This failure had the potential to lead to miscommunication among caregivers, inconsistent care delivery, improper use of side rails, and potential injury of resident. 1.During an observation on 1/6/25 at 9:04 a.m. in Resident 12's room, Resident 12 was seen sitting up in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the elopement (when a resident leaves the facility's premises or a safe area without authorization, or necessary supervision) of one of seven residents (Resident 7) when staff did not respond promptly to a security elopement alarm when Resident 7 eloped from the facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to experience injury such as falling or struck by traffic, becoming disoriented and lost due to his unsupervised time away from the facility, and also the potential for six other residents who were identified as elopement risks (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6) to elope. During a review of Resident 7's Progress Notes (PN), dated 11/1/25, at 8:23 p.m., the PN indicated he was admitted to the facility that evening with diagnoses that included acute encephalopathy (a rapid onset of altered brain function that can cause confusion and disorientation) and was noted to have episodes of. Severe impairment (affecting all areas of judgement). Walks frequently. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer an antibiotic (a medicine that inhibits the growth of or destroys disease causing microorganisms such as bacteria) as prescribed by a physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving antibiotics for an infected left ankle, potentially resulting in worsening infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) , dated 4/21/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included aftercare for a fractured left ankle. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Note (PN) , dated 3/4/25, by Surgeon 1, the PN indicated, Surgeon 1 had performed surgery on Resident 1's fractured left ankle on 1/4/25. The PN indicated Resident 1 was seen for a follow up visit by Surgeon 1 on 3/3/25. The PN indicated, concern for surgical site infection. Bactrim [an antibiotic] ordered today. The PN indicated Bactrim DS 800-160 milligrams (a unit of measurement) per tablet take one tablet by mouth two times per day for 10 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was free from injury when he attempted to self-transfer out of his bed with the bed ' s wheels unlocked, resulting in a bedside fall and fracture to his left hip. This failure had the potential to contribute to the fall with fracture when the bed ' s unlocked wheels caused the bed to move when he attempted to transfer out of bed. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), dated 10/11/24, the AR indicated Resident was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnosis that included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies ( a type of progressive dementia that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning and independent function); bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration, can make it difficult to carry out day-to-day tasks); and dementia (a chronic condition that causes a decline in mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-27 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey in a place readily accessible to 91 of 91 residents, families, and their legal representatives. This failure had the potential to violate the rights of residents and their representatives to be informed of previous survey deficiencies. Findings: During an observation on 9/24/24 at 10:30 a.m., a binder labeled CDPH Survey Results was located in a holder in the hallway east of the main entrance. During a review of the facility's, CDPH Survey Results binder, undated, the binder did not contain results for the facilities last recertification survey on 9/22. During an interview on 9/24/24 at 10:35 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the facility had their last survey 9/22. The DON stated the results of that survey were not included in the CDPH Survey Results binder. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/24/24 at 10:42 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the facility's CDPH Survey Results binder, undated, was reviewed. The CDPH Survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with current accepted professional standards of practice when: 1. Two of four medication carts were found unlocked and unattended by Licensed nurses. This failure had the potential for residents, staff, and visitors to access the medication carts. 2. Polyethylene glycol 3350 was left on top of the medication cart 1 unattended in Station 1. This failure had the potential risk of other residents, staff and visitors walking by and gaining access to the medication and could lead to adverse effect when taken without a prescription. 3. An expired bottle of Lactulose ( a non-absorbable sugar used in the treatment of constipation), was observed in the medication cart. This failure had the potential for Resident to receive expired medication which could have undesired effects. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/25/24 at 8:50a.m. with Licensed Vocational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program was maintained for 91 of 91 sampled residents when: 1. A room containing five full sharps containers (a bin used to store needles which have been used on residents) was unlocked and accessible to 91 of 91 residents. The sharps containers were stacked on top of each other. One of those containers was full and did not have a lid covering it. This failure had the potential to cause residents to enter the room and hurt themselves if they touched the exposed sharps. 2. Resident 58's oxygen concentrator (a medical device which provides oxygen to a resident) filter was covered in dirt, dust, and lint like materials. This failure had the potential to introduce contaminants (materials which can make something dirty) into the oxygen supply and cause Resident 59 to breathe in dirty air. 3. Resident 61 and Resident 3's oxygen concentrator filters were covered with grayish white material. This failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity in an environment that promotes and enhances quality of life for five of 21 sampled residents (Residents 68, 81, 245, 246, and 350,) when Residents 68, 81, 245, 246 and 350 waited up to 20 minutes for their lunch tray while watching other residents eat their meal while in the dining room. This failure violated Residents' 68, 81, 245, 246 and 350 the right to be offered a dignified dining experience. Findings: During an observation on 9/23/24 at 12:21 p.m. in the dining room, nursing staff passed out lunch trays to residents in the dining room except two residents, Resident 68 and Resident 81. Resident 68 and Resident 81 did not receive a lunch tray and watched other residents eat sitting at the same table. Resident 68 and Resident 81 were observed looking at other residents eating around them. Resident 68 and Resident 81 were served their lunch 15-20 minutes after other residents were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident centered care plan for three of 11 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 31, and Resident 53) when: 1. Resident 31 did not have a care plan for the use of clotrimazole (brand name-used to treat fungal infection) medication. This failure placed Resident 31 at risk for complications from not having care needs planned by licensed nurses to determine if nursing intervention needed to be added, changed, or completed. 2. The padding on Resident 1's left bedrail was not fully intact, and the metal bar was exposed This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 sustaining an injury during a seizure (uncontrolled bursts of electrical activities that change sensations behaviors, awareness and muscle movements) episode. 3. Resident 53 did not have a care plan in place for the change in condition for diarrhea on 9/14/24. This failure had the to result in Resident 53's medical needs not to be met. Findings: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of quality of care for one of five sampled residents (Resident 68) when Resident 68's fluid restriction order was not followed according to the physician order. This failure resulted in Resident 68 consuming more than the allowed fluid intake which could lead to fluid overload and could result in serious health condition. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/23/24 at 7:45 a.m. during the initial tour, Resident 68 was sitting up in bed, with an over the bed table placed in front of her with a brown cup was on the bed table. Resident 68 was holding the brown cup and stated she wanted more coffee. During concurrent observation and interview on 9/23/24 at 12:55 p.m. in the dining room, Resident 68 was observed seated at a dining table with two other residents. Observed in front of Resident 68 was an eight-ounce cup (240 cc[cubic centimeter-unit of measurement]) of coffee, clear eight ounces (240 cc) cup containing reddish colored liquid,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent (11.54%) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 administered glucophage (medication used to treat diabetes) medication and methenamine (medication used to treat urinary bladder infection suppression]) without food and did not follow instructions for medication administration with food. This failure had the potential for Resident 44 to develop gastrointestinal upset (GI-gastric upset like diarrhea) which could lead to serious health condition. 2. LVN 1 did not follow medication direction when he administered Polyethylene Glycol (medication used to treat constipation) to Resident 244. This failure had the potential for Resident 244 to develop constipation which could lead to serious health condition. Findings: 1. During a concurrent medication administration pass observation and interview on 9/25/24 at 8:40 a.m. at Station 1, LVN 3 was preparing Resident 44's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1 was competent to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services safely and effectively when DC 1 did not check the internal temperature of three pork loins prior to prepping to serve and was not able to be verbalize the cooking or process of reheating cooked food per the facility's policy. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe food being served, consumed, and could have cause food borne illness. Findings: During an observation on 9/24/24 at 10:18 a.m. in the kitchen, DC 1 was observed removing a baking tray containing three pork loins out of the oven without checking the internal temperature. DC 1 took the baking tray containing the three pork loins to the prep area for preparing to slice the pork loins for service. During an interview on 9/24/25 at 10:30 a.m. in the prep area, with DC 1, DC 1 stated he worked for the facility for three weeks. DC 1 stated he did not check the internal temperature of the pork loin. DC 1 stated he was not sure what the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe, sanitary food preparation and storage practices were followed for 87 of 91 residents when: 1. A serving cart was observed with a white powdered substance spilled and scattered throughout the top surface. 2. A storage room in the kitchen was observed with dirt and debris on the floor and the base boards were peeling and missing from one side of the wall. These failures placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (illness caused by consuming contaminated food) and had the potential to attract pest and rodents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/23/24 at 7:35 a.m. with the Dietary Manager Supervisor (DMS) in the kitchen, a white powdered substance was spilled and scattered on the top of the serving cart. On the serving cart was two serving tray, a box of gloves, a box of aprons, a roll of clear garbage bags and a plastic holder container for utensil. The DMS stated, The serving cart should not be like that. The DMS stated the dirty serving cart can cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Residents 351), had their code status (resident's instructions to a medical team about the type of treatment they want if their heart or breathing stops) documented upon admission on the Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST). Resident 365's POLST form was not completed and signed by the physician for more than eleven days after admission and not in accordance with the facility policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 351's wishes not being honored and unnecessary medical interventions administered. Findings: During a review of Resident 351's electronic medical records (EMR) on [DATE] at 10:10 a.m., the EMR indicated, no POLST was in the (EMR). A copy of the printed POLST form was requested on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 351's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated prepared [DATE], the POLST indicated, .Box A Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy of personal information for one of three sampled residents (Resident 34) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 left her workstation computer open and unattended with Resident 34's information exposed to public view. This failure resulted in violation of Resident 34's right to confidentiality and the potential for unauthorized access to Resident 34's personal information. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/25/24 at 3:40 p.m. with LVN 2, outside of Resident 34's room, LVN 2 entered Resident 34's room and left her computer screen open with Resident 34's information open. LVN 2 stated she should not have left her computer screen open. LVN 2 stated any residents, staff and visitors walking by could have seen Resident 34's private information violating her privacy. During a review of Resident 34's admission Record [AR-document which contain patient personal information], dated 9/26/24, the AR indicated Resident 34 was admitted in the facility on 11/22/23 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two of six sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 39) when Resident 16 had the following at bedside: 1. A plastic bag of fresh onions, tomatoes and avocados on the floor. 2. On a shelf were multiple cans of soup, bananas, cookies, ramen noodle soup, bottles of spices with broken lids, individual packets of sugar, pepper, mayonnaise and loaves of bread. 3. The sink area had kitchen utensils and under the sink was a small ice chest, loaf of bread and small bottles of spices. These failures provided an unclean and un-homelike environment for Resident 16 and Resident 39 (Resident 16's roommate) and placed them at risk for cross contamination from improper storage of personal food. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool used to identify cognitive [pertaining to reasoning, memory and judgement] and physical function level), assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level l Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-The State is required to ensure that every person entering a Medicaid certified Nursing Facility [NF] receives a Level I screening and if necessary a Level II evaluation to ensure that their NF residence is appropriate and to identify what specialized services they may need) was completed accurately for one of two sampled residents (Resident 68) when Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This failure had the potential for Resident 68 not to receive the necessary and appropriate psychiatric level of treatment and evaluation in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 68's admission Record (AR), dated 9/26/24, the AR indicated, Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified psychosis (collection of symptoms that cause a person to lose touch with reality and have difficulty distinguishing reality) and depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health was performed for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3's toenails were long, thick, and crooked. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 3 to receive injuries from her toenails digging into her skin. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR, documents containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), dated 9/25/24, the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (condition where the body has trouble controlling blood sugar levels), restless leg syndrome (condition which causes uncontrollable urge to move legs), and Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder which causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking and stiffness). During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/25/24 at 11:10 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to determine and document resident meal preferences for one six sampled residents (Resident 11) when Resident 11 did not have his dislikes listed on his meal ticket (a document which indicates a resident's diet, allergies, preferences, and dislikes.) This failure resulted in resident 11 not eating his lunch on 9/23/24 and caused him to not receive the nutritional benefits of his meal. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS-resident assessment tool which indicates physical and cognitive abilities), the MDS indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment of cognitive function) score of 15 (0-7 severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 no cognitive impairment), indicating Resident 11 had no cognitive impairment. During an interview on 9/23/24 at 9:00 a.m. with Resident 11, Resident 11 stated he disliked Italian food and stated it was served frequently in the facility. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/23/24 at 12:49 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adaptive equipment was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 68) when Resident 68 was not provided built-up utensils on her meal tray. This failure had the potential to limit Resident 68's ability to feed herself independently and safely. Findings: During an observation on 9/23/24 at 12:45 p.m. in the dining room, Resident 68's meal tray had a regular spoon and fork. During a review of Resident 68's admission Record, dated 9/26/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included psychosis (set of symptoms that can cause someone to lose touch of reality and have difficulty distinguishing what is real and what is not), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 68's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 9/26/24, the OSR indicated, . Resident to have a divided plate and built-up utensils for use during meals, and a 2-handled mug with lid for liquids .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on kitchen observations, interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one of two cooks (Cook 2) was competent in position related duties when [NAME] 2 was unable to demonstrate: 1. Adequate handwashing. 2. Prevention of cross contamination of food (measuring scoop use). 3. Cleaning, sanitizing and properly storing food preparation equipment (meat slicer, steam table pans & weighing scale). 4. Manual ware washing of cookware used for resident food preparation. 5. Proper testing of the kitchen sanitizing solution. 6. Preparation of puree food items for according to the recipe for Residents 44, 28, 46, 31, 27 and 17. 7. Preparation of food in a manner that maintained the nutritional value of resident meals. 8. Food prepared for the facility residents was palatable. These failures resulted in the inability to meet nutritional needs for residents receiving pureed diets, poor meal quality and decreased meal satisfaction in a medically vulnerable resident population of 76 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen and also posed a risk for food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food prepared for residents was palatable and cooked to preserve nutritive value when: 1. Residents 6, 80, and 287 complained the food lacked flavor and the vegetables were over cooked. 2. Vegetables were cooked more than two hours prior to meal service in an oven temperature above 400 degrees Fahrenheit (F). These failures could potentially affect the nutritive content of the food and the amount of food residents consume, which could result to decrease residents' food intake and lead to poor nutrition and health outcomes. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/23/22, at 1:09 p.m., on nursing unit one, residents were being served lunch in their rooms. Resident 6 stated, the food was so bland and lacked flavor. Resident 6 did not eat the turkey served with his lunch meal. Resident 287 stated, the food was not good, but he forced himself to eat because he had lost weight in the hospital. Resident 287 did not eat the broccoli served with this lunch meal. Resident 287 stated, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food safety guidelines were followed when: 1. [NAME] 2 touched the trash can then failed to wash hands and sanitized kitchen counters. 2. A measuring scoop was placed on a kitchen cart then placed in a plastic bin containing a food product without being sanitized. 3. Expired food items in the walk-in refrigerator, resident refrigerator, and dry storage room were not discarded. 4. Leftover potatoes were not cooled down properly. 5. Steam table pans, three frying pans, four cutting boards and a can opener blade were not safe for use. 6. A meat slicer, mixer, can opener and a weight scale were not clean. 7. Three food items in plastic bins were not labeled and did not have open dates. 8. Milk was stored in crates on the floor of the walk-in refrigerator. 9. More than five steam table pans were stored wet and not inverted. 10. Walk-in refrigerator door, knife rack and a plastic container with clean divided plates were not clean. 11. Two kitchen brooms were stored on the floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control and prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable (contagious) diseases and infections when: 1. Family (FM) was in a contact isolation room for Clostridium difficile (C. diff- bacterial infection that causes life threatening diarrhea) without gown and gloves. This failure place residents, visitors, and staff at risk for transmission (a process on how an infectious agent can be transferred from one person to another) of C. diff infections. 2. Nurse Practitioner (NP) entered the facility without self-screening for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19- virus that causes a respiratory disease and is spread from person to person through sputum droplets released when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks). This failure placed residents, visitors and staff at increased risk for transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper maintenance of essential equipment when: 1. Five of five freezers (including resident refrigerator [two] and medication refrigerator[two]) had excessive ice build-up. 2. The walk-in refrigerator door in the kitchen was not flush with the door frame exposing a gap. 3. The numbers indicating the temperature of the oven located on the oven dial used to prepare resident food were worn and illegible. These failures had the potential for equipment not functioning in the way they were intended and in turn cause contamination of food and medications which could lead to illnesses for the residents. 4. The two laundry dryers' did not have heat and cool-down time control knobs. This failure placed residents at risk for exposure to mold spores due to laundry not being thoroughly dried. Findings: 1. During a review of professional reference titled, USDA Food Code 2017, Section 4-501.11, indicated, Good Repair and Proper Adjustment, Proper maintenance of equipment to manufacturer specifications helped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of residents' property for one of three sampled residents (Resident 26) when the facility did not take action to resolve Resident 26's lost money which was not logged in his belongings inventory list. This failure resulted in the loss of Resident 26's 40 dollars. Findings: During an interview on 8/23/22, at 9:13 a.m., with Resident 26, Resident 26 stated, a month ago she had lost 40 dollars. Resident 26 stated, she informed Social Service department regarding her loss but was not reimbursed. Resident 26 stated, she asked staff to buy her drinks and snacks from the vending machine. Resident 26 stated, it was the staff who took her money. During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment, dated 6/10/22, indicated Resident 26's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - assessment of cognitive status for memory and judgment) scored 14 out of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for two of six sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 20) when Resident 9 and Resident 20's smoking habits was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 9 and Resident 20's care needs not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's, Face sheet (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 8/25/22, indicated diagnoses which included nicotine (the substance in tobacco that people become addicted to) dependence, emphysema (damage to the air sacs in the lungs) and shortness of breath. During a review of Resident 9's, Smoking Safety Evaluation, dated 2/21/22, the Smoking Safety Evaluation indicated, Resident 9 used tobacco. During an interview on 8/25/22, at 9:33 a.m., with Resident 9, Resident 9…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for two of three sampled residents (Resident 21 and Resident 20) when: 1. Residents 21 did not have a care plan for the use of anticoagulant [blood thinner] medications. This failure placed resident 21 at risk for complications from not having care needs planned by licensed nurses to determine if nursing interventions needed to be added, changed or completed. 2. Resident 20 did not have a care plan for smoking. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 20's smoking needs going unmet. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 21's clinical record titled admission RECORD dated 8/24/22, was reviewed. The admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility with the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow and blood clot formation). During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/25/22, at 10:09 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 21 Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident-centered comprehensive care plan was revised for two of two non-sampled residents (Residents 80 and Resident 285) when: 1. Resident 80 was lactose intolerant and the care plan focus titled, Impaired nutritional and hydration status, did not reflect lactose intolerance. This failure placed Resident 80 at risk for complications abdominal cramps, bloating, and diarrhea) due to lactose intolerance and not having care needs planned by licensed nurses to determine if interventions needed to be added, changed or completed. 2. Resident 285 preferred her breakfast meal to be served at 7:00 a.m. and there was no documentation in Resident 285's care plan stating Resident 285 requested her breakfast at 7:00 a.m. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 285's mealtime preferences not being met. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 80's clinical record titled, admission RECORD, dated 8/25/22, was reviewed. The admission Record indicated, Resident 80 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provided services which met professional standards of quality of care for one of four sampled residents (Resident 19) when Resident 19's supplemental (added when there is a lack or deficiency) oxygen flow rate was not administered according to the physician order. This failure resulted in Resident 19 not receiving the amount oxygen she needed which could lead to breathing problems. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (AR- document containing resident personal information), dated 8/25/22, the ARindicated, Resident 19 was admitted in the facility on 9/10/21, with diagnoses which included . dependence on supplemental oxygen . During a review of Resident 19's Order Summary Report, dated 8/25/22, the Order Summary Report indicated, . Oxygen @ [at] 2L [liter]/min [minute] via [by way of] nasal cannula [a tubing used to deliver oxygen through the nose] continuously every shift . During observation on 8/23/22, at 8:25 a.m., in room Resident 19's room, Resident 19 was laying in bed with eyes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities for one of six sampled resident (Resident 61) when Resident 61 was not provided individual and independent activities designed to meet his interest. This failure resulted in Resident 61 inactivity (lack of activity) which could potentially affect his physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an observation on 8/23/22, at 8:07 a.m., in Resident 61's room, Resident 61 was in bed in a semi-sitting position, eating. Resident did not answer to questions asked. During an observation on 8/23/22, at 1:15 p.m., in Resident 61's room, Resident 61 was sitting in bed eating lunch. During a review of Resident 61's clinical record titled, admission Record, (document containing resident personal information) dated 8/25/22, the admission Record' indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards for two of three sampled residents (Resident 21 and 43) when Resident 21 and 43's low air loss (LAL- an air mattress with fluctuating air) mattress prescribed air pressure setting was not set based on the patient' weight. This failure had the potential to cause fall with injury. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:33 a.m., with Resident 21, in Resident 21's room, Resident 21 was laying in bed on a LAL mattress. The LAL mattress air setting was on lock position and the LAL mattress air pressure was set at 180 pounds. Resident 21 stated, her mattress felt lumpy [uncomfortable] and was not at the correct setting. During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment, dated 5/31/22, indicated, Resident 21's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- assessment of cognitive status for memory and judgment) assessment scored was 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurses have the competencies necessary to meet the needs of the residents for two of three sampled residents (Resident 21 and 43) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and 5 did not have training and competencies to operate the low air loss (LAL- an air mattress with fluctuating air) mattress. This failure had the potential to cause resident falls and injury due to inaccurate LAL pressure settings. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 8:33 a.m., with Resident 21, in Resident 21' s room, Resident 21 was laying in bed on a LAL mattress. The LAL mattress air setting was on lock position and the LAL mattress air pressure was set at 180 pounds. Resident 21 stated, her mattress felt lumpy [uncomfortable] and was not at the correct setting. During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment, dated 5/31/22, indicated Resident 21's Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when: 1. One Tuberculin (combination of proteins that are used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis [potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs]) vial (small container for liquids) was opened with no indication of used-by date or open date. This failure had the potential to produce inaccurate PPD (purified protein derivatives) Test (skin test is a test that determines if you have tuberculosis) results and or cause harm to a vulnerable population if administered beyond the manufacturer's used by date. 2. Resident 64's Levalbuterol (medication used to prevent and treat difficulty breathing, wheezing, shortness of breath) medication was opened with no indication of used-by date or when the foil pouch was opened. This failure had the potential to decrease the medication potency that could compromise the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-06 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a diet that accommodated residents preferences for one of one resident (Resident 99) when Resident 99's food preferences and intolerances were not obtained in a timely manner (past 7 days). This failure posed the risk for Resident 99 to not receive the food he preferred and food that he could tolerate which in turn could contribute to decreased intake and meal dissatisfaction. Findings: During a review of the clinical record titled, admission Record (AR), dated 12/13/22, for Resident 99, the AR indicated Resident 99 was a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body's inability to produce the hormone insulin), hypertension (high blood pressure), and peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). During a review of Resident 99's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recipes were followed for puree (a smooth creamy substance made of liquidized food) diets when an unmeasured quantity of food thickener was added to puree food items by [NAME] 2. This failure resulted in food recipes not followed which posed the risk to alter the nutritional value and taste of the food being produced which in turn could compromise the nutritional status and meal satisfaction for Residents 44, 28. 46, 31, 27 and 17. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/22, at 10:19 a.m., with [NAME] 2, in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 was preparing food items for lunch. [NAME] 2 stated, she was preparing puree food for six residents (Residents 44, 28, 46, 31, 27 and 17). [NAME] 2 put an unmeasured quantity of cooked fish in the blender. [NAME] 2 stated, she was using about six pieces of fish. [NAME] 2 added an unmeasured amount of chicken broth to the fish three times. [NAME] 2 placed the blended fish into a steam table pan. The pureed fish had a liquid consistency. [NAME] 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences and intolerances were followed for one of one non-sampled resident (Resident 80) when Resident 80 was served milk with his lunch meal. This failure had the potential for Resident 80's meal intake to be inadequate which could compromise his nutritional status. Findings: During a review of Resident 80's clinical record titled admission RECORD dated 8/25/22, the admission Record indicated, Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an observation on 8/23/22, at 1:09 p.m., in the dining room. Resident 80 was served his lunch meal. Resident 80's lunch meal consisted of eight ounces whole milk, eight ounces of (nutritional shake brand), four ounces cranberry juice, roast turkey with gravy, bread stuffing, broccoli, dinner roll and a glazed apple square. During a review of Resident 80's lunch meal ticket, dated 8/23/22, the ticket indicated, Resident 80 was on a consistent carbohydrate regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records for residents that were complete, accurately documented and readily accessible for two of six sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 16) when the Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form (a legal document that specifies the type of care a resident's treatment and services would like in an emergency life threatening medical situation) was incomplete for Resident 9 and Resident 16. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 9 and Resident 16's decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options not being honored. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's clinical record titled, admission Record (document containing resident personal information), dated 8/25/22, indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, . Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), emphysema (damage to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-06 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of bed rails as part of the facility's regular maintenance program for one of three sampled residents (Resident 14) when Resident 14's right side rail appeared bent leaning away from the bed. This failure had the potential to result in an injury or accident to Resident 14. Findings: During an observation on 8/23/22, at 11:05 a.m., in Resident 14's room, Resident 14 was laying in bed with two bed rails up. The bed rail (right side) appeared bent leaning away from the bed and had a large gap between the mattress and the bed rail in comparison to the left side rail. During a review of Resident 14's Order, dated 8/19/22, was reviewed. The Order indicated, . Bilateral ½ siderails up to assist the resident when turning and repositioning in bed . During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/22, at 10:56 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5, the facility Maintenance Request Log, undated, was reviewed. The Maintenance Request Log indicated, the date, location,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$12,048 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-08-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Bixby Towers Post-Acute RehabLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Woodland Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 3 of 5Berkley Post-AcuteVan Nuys, CA 3 of 5Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare CenterGardena, CA 3 of 5Lake Park Healthcare CenterOakland, CA 3 of 5Marina Pointe Healthcare & SubacuteCulver City, CA 3 of 5Mission Palms Healthcare CenterWestminster, CA 3 of 5Riverwood Health CareStockton, CA 3 of 5The Gardens Healthcare CenterNorthridge, CA 3 of 5Tracy Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterTracy, CA 4 of 5Alta Healthcare Center of CamarilloCamarillo, CA 4 of 5Country Crest Post-AcuteOroville, CA 4 of 5Lodi Nursing & RehabilitationLodi, CA 4 of 5North Park Post-AcuteTracy, CA 4 of 5San Juan Hills Healthcare CenterSan Juan Capistrano, CA 4 of 5South Marin Health & Wellness CenterGreenbrae, CA 4 of 5The Rehabilitation Center At The PalazzoPhoenix, AZ 4 of 5Villa Valencia Healthcare CenterLaguna Hills, CA 5 of 5Cottonwood Healthcare CenterWoodland, CA 5 of 5Greenridge Post AcuteEl Sobrante, CA 5 of 5Hillcrest Heights Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5La Casa Via Transitional Care CenterWalnut Creek, CA 5 of 5Oakland Heights Nursing And RehabilitationOakland, CA 5 of 5Pacific Heights Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Petaluma Post-Acute RehabilitationPetaluma, CA 5 of 5Stonebrook Health And RehabilitationLos Gatos, CA 5 of 5The Avenues Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5The Springs Healthcare Center At The CarlottaPalm Desert, CA 5 of 5University Post-Acute RehabSacramento, CA 5 of 5Woodlands Healthcare CenterLos Gatos, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ASFC,LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 10/01/2009
BRADSHAW, PETERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/07/2023
ELSNER, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2009
KIRKWOOD, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
ORGILL, CRAIGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
PARTI, RAJESHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2009
PARTI, SHRUTYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2009
PAXMAN, MARCUSIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
RAWE, COLTONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ESTRADA, SALVADORIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/06/2023
GALAN, ANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CSFC, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
EAST WEST BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2009
SEQUOIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BRADSHAW, JEFFREYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
BRADY, VERNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
CASE, RYANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
HAKIMIPOUR, MEHDIIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2020
JURADO, FRANKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 16%Other / private 29%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$411per resident / day
operating cost
$12,505per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$402per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555866. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next