Ocean Pointe Healthcare Center
1330 17th Street, Santa Monica, CA 90404 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 72 certified beds · (310) 829-5411 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $55,450 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-15)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 34.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.38 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 190 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.4%CMS range 43.8–57.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 9.5–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 65.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.5–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.58 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 65.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.81 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide alternate call system for nine of 62 residents from 3/9/2024 to 3/12/2024 when the facility's call system was nonfunctional. As a result: 1. Resident 58 continued to suffer burning pain to his left leg at a level 9 out of 10 (9/10 - zero is no pain and 10 is severe pain) because the call light system was not working, and staff were not responding to the Resident 58 calling for help/pain medication. 2. Residents 26, 49, 51, 58, 64, 119, 120, and 219 banged on the tables, yelled, and screamed for staff to get help. Residents 49, 64, 119, and 120 waited for 30 minutes to 1 hour for staff assistance. Residents 119 needed help to go to the rest room. Resident 120 needed to be turned and repositioned. Resident 51 felt distressed. 3. Resident 26 stated she was petrified and uncomfortable and that in case of emergency, she would not be able to get help because the facility's call light was not working 4. Residents 49 and 64 needed help for activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-02 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3), performed cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR, is an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's undated policy and procedures (P&P) titled Manual Ventilation and undated document titled Chest Compressions, and the American Heart Association (AHA - organization in the United States that funds cardiovascular medical research, educates consumers on healthy living and fosters appropriate cardiac care in an effort to reduce disability and deaths) Algorithm (a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations) titled Adult Basic Life Support Algorithm for Healthcare Providers for the year 2020 to implement 30 chest compressions and two breaths. Certified nursing assistant 1 (CNA 1) found Resident 1 in bed and unresponsive on [DATE] at 7:35 am. During CPR, LVN 3 placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare, store, and serve food in a sanitary manner and environment. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness for the residents who consumed food from the facility's kitchen.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview in the facility's kitchen on 6/1/2026 at 7:37 A.M. with the Food Services Director (FSD), a metal pot filled with white liquid was in the refrigerator with a use by date of 5/29/2026. The FSD stated the white liquid was a prepared protein shake mixture. The FSD stated that the current date was 6/1/26, therefore the shake mixture should be thrown away. During an observation on 6/1/2026 at 7:55 A.M. in the kitchen, Dietary Aide (DA) 1 was serving food onto a plate while holding the plate's surface with a bandaged thumb. During an interview with the FSD on 6/1/26 at 7:55 A.M., the FSD stated that DA1 should wear a glove on the injured hand when serving food minimize the risk of food contamination (transfer of bacteria, viruses, or chemicals into food).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 77), the facility failed to ensure that Giver (CG) 1 provided and maintained Resident 77's privacy and dignity (basic right to be valued, respected, and treated as a human being) by failing to close the door and close dignity (privacy) curtains door to the room during activities of daily living care (ADL - activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily) according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) tiled Quality of Life -Dignity, revised 1/2026 for one of one sampled resident. This deficient practice resulted in violating Resident 77's rights to be treated with privacy and dignity and also had the potential for the resident not to feel dignified and suffer lowered self-esteem.Findings: A review of Resident 77's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 77 on 10/23/2024 and readmitted Resident 77 on 5/26/2026 with diagnoses including dementia (progressive state of decline in mental abilities), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of one resident (Resident 22) the facility failed to:1. Notify a physician that Resident 22 was self-administering medications and storing medications at the bedside.2. Obtain a physician's order for Resident 22 to self-administer medications and or supplements, and store medications and/or supplements at the bedside3. Conduct an assessment if Resident 22 can self-administer medications and/or supplements and store medications and/or supplements at the bedside. These failures had the potential to result in harm, hospitalization and death to Resident 22.Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (Face Sheet - includes a resident's identification, medical, and demographic information), the admission Record indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 22 on 3/16/2021, and then readmitted Resident 22 on 3/19/2025 with medical diagnoses that included obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (a genetic heart condition where the heart wall becomes abnormally thick, reducing the flow of oxygen-rich blood from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriately sized bed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 26). This failure resulted in Resident 26 feeling uncomfortable and had the potential for the resident to suffer physical discomfort, pain, and develop pressure ulcers (injuries that occur when sustained pressure cuts off blood and oxygen supply to the skin and underlying tissue leading to tissue death typically forming over bony prominences (like the tailbone, heels, hips, and elbows) or beneath tight medical devices), dissatisfaction, and psychosocial harm.Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission record, dated 11/25/2025, the admission record indicated Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses but not limited to hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of voluntary movement on one entire side of the body) affecting the right side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dysarthria (muscles used to breathe or talk are weakened or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 6) was not provided with the bedside table was missing one of four wheels. This failure had the potential to result in accidents and injuries not limited to the bedside table tilting, collapsing, and falling on Resident 6, and hot liquids and food spilling on Resident 6. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (Face sheet, which includes a resident's identification, medical, and demographic information), dated 6/4/2026, the admission Record indicated, the facility admitted Resident 6 on 5/11/2020 with medical diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (severe or complete loss of motor function on one side of the body, affecting the arm, leg, and sometimes facial muscles caused by lack of blood supply in the brain), dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), essential hypertension (chronic high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM II - chronic disorder of persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged incident of abuse (a willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within 24 hours for two of two sampled residents (Resident 79 and Resident 80). This failure resulted in delayed investigation by CDPH to ensure the safety and wellbeing of Residents 79 and 80, with the potential for continued resident to resident altercation, harm/injury and hospitalization.Findings: During a review of Resident's 79 admission Record (also known as a 'face sheet,' which includes a resident's identification, medical, and demographic information), dated 6/4/2026, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 79 on 12/27/2025 with medical diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a long-term lung disease that makes breathing difficult by blocking airflow into and out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan addressing supplemental oxygen therapy (a medical treatment that provides extra oxygen to people who cannot get enough through normal breathing) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 75) according to the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Baseline Care plan dated 1/29/2026. This deficient practice resulted in failure to establish a guide for Resident 75s respiratory status that would allow nurses to safely titrate (to gradually adjust the dosage of a medication over time-upward or downward-to find the exact amount that achieves the best results while causing the fewest side effects) flow rates, prevent toxic hyperoxemia (an abnormally high concentration of oxygen in the blood), and detect respiratory deterioration early and had the potential for delayed provision of necessary care and services.Findings: A review of Resident 75's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the environment was free from accidents and hazards by failing to ensure that staff did not leave unidentified white creamy substance in a medication cup at the bedside of one out of one sampled resident (Resident 7). This deficient practice had the potential to result in harm through ingestion of the unidentified white creamy substance, leading to poisoning and/or allergic reactions, unnecessary hospitalizations and even death for residents who are confused and or with wandering behaviors.Findings: A review of Resident 7's admission record indicated Resident 7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (high sugar in the blood), chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD- is a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition that develops when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure one out one sampled Resident (Resident 75) received the sufficient enteral feeding (a medical method of delivering specialized liquid food and nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.), as per physician order summary dated 6/4/2026 . This deficient practice placed Residents 75 at risk for altered nutritional status such as delayed wound healing and muscle wasting to chronic (ongoing) diseases and increased susceptibility to infections, weight loss, altered hydration status and complications associated with fluid imbalance.Findings: A review of Resident 75's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, sequelae of cerebral infarction (permanent residual effects, impairments, and complications that persist after someone suffers a stroke), encounter for gastrostomy (a medical device inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach.), dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident received the correct oxygen (a colorless, odorless gas that is essential for life and the proper functioning of the body) therapy as prescribed (ordered) by the physician for one (1) out of the three residents (Resident 75). This deficient practice had the potential to cause oxygen toxicity (excess oxygen supply in tissues and organs, typically caused by breathing higher concentrations of supplemental oxygen) resulting in damage to the lungs, coughing, difficulty breathing and even death in severe cases for Resident 75. Findings: A review of Resident 75's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, sequelae of cerebral infarction (permanent residual effects, impairments, and complications that persist after someone suffers a stroke), encounter for gastrostomy (a medical device inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach.), dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a private caregiver did not provide incontinent care direct care to one of one resident (Resident 77) according to the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) tiled Private Duty Sitter, revised 1/2026. This deficient practice had the potential to result in infection, injury and/or hospitalization for Resident 77.Findings: A review of Resident 77's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 77 on 10/23/2024 and readmitted Resident 77 on 5/26/2026 with diagnoses including dementia (progressive state of decline in mental abilities), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), and hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure). A review of Resident 77's Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident assessment tool) dated 5/30/2026, indicated Resident 77 is cognitively impaired (when a person has trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions that affect their everyday life). The MDS indicated Resident 77 is dependent on staff with activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty on the 7am-3pm, 3pm-11pm, and 11pm-7am shifts on 7/20/2026. The facility had 64 residents in house. This failure had the potential for the residents' clinical needs not to be met and delayed assessments and interventions when needed. Findings: During a review of the facility's Licensed Nursing Schedule, dated July 2025, the Licensed Nursing Schedule indicated that there was no RN on duty for 7/20/2025. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/4/2026 at 11:50 A.M. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility nursing assignment sheet, dated 7/20/2025 was reviewed. The nursing assignment sheet indicated that on 7/20/2025, there was no RN on-duty for 8 consecutive hours on all three shifts (7am-3pm, 3pm-11pm, and 11pm-7am). The DSD confirmed and stated that there was no RN on duty for 8 consecutive hours on 7/20/2025. The DSD stated that if there is no RN is on duty, the facility cannot perform assessments on the residents and certain medication will not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that lids of two of three sampled outside garbage bins were closed. This failure had the potential to attract pests that could create a health and safety risk to the residents, visitors, and staff in the facility.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/1/2026 at 1:31 P.M. with the Food Services Director (FSD) in the alley behind the facility, two outside garbage and recycling bin lids were left open. The FSD stated that garbage bins must be covered to prevent pests. During a review of The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Food Code, dated 2022, the regulation indicated, Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnables used with materials containing food residue and used outside the food establishment shall be designed and constructed to have tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed documentation on dental ancillary (supportive medical) services for one of one sampled resident (Resident 63) according to facility's job description titled, Social Service Designee, dated 2003, and the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Dental Services, dated 1/2026. This failure had the potential to not meet the physical and psychosocial needs of Resident 63. Findings: During a review of Resident 63's admission record, dated 3/31/2026, the admission record indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses but not limited to fracture of the left mandible (lower jawbone), dementia (a state of decline in mental abilities), hypertension (high blood pressure), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 63's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 4/4/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 63 was cognitively (mental ability to make decisions of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the complete implementation of infection control practices in the facility, when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not clean and disinfect (use of chemical agents to destroy germs) shared resident care equipment before and after use for two of 20 sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 30).This failure had the potential for resident harm, as not cleaning and disinfecting shared resident care equipment before and after use can spread pathogens (disease causing germs) between residents throughout the facility, leading to transmission of infection to multiple residents in the facilityFindings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record (Face sheet, which includes a resident's identification, medical, and demographic information), dated 6/4/2026, the admission Record indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 35 on 6/10/2024, and then readmitted on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's call button (a button or remote on a cord that a patient in a hospital or nursing home presses to get help) was within reach for three of seven residents (Residents 8, 47, and 58) when residents 47's according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) tiled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, with revision date 10/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed care, falls, accidents and/or hospitalization for Residents 8, 47, and 58. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the record indicated that Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heart beat), Alzheimer's disease (a brain disease that affects memory, thinking skills, and the ability to carry out simple daily tasks), and care following a surgery on the digestive system. During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of four sample resident (Resident 1) was provided with immediate interventions such as monitoring and assessment to assure the safety of the resident after Resident 1 reported an allegation of physical altercation between another resident (Resident 2) according to facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Alleged or Suspected Abuse and Crime Reporting and Charting and Documentation.This deficient practice placed residents being subject to neglect, verbal, mental and physical abuse.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), difficulty in walking, Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and depression (a mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's call light (a device used to notify the nurse that the resident needs assistance) were answered promptly for two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the residents not being able to summon staff for assistance for care and services as needed, which could lead to accidents such as falls with injuries. During a review of the admission Record, the record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of falling, muscle weakness (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle), fibromyalgia (a condition that causes pain all over the body, sleep problems, fatigue, and often emotional and mental distress) and difficulty in walking. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident assessment tool) dated 12/9/2025, indicated Resident 2's cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff follow infection prevention when Treatment Nurse 1 (TXN 1) and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 3 did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE- protective items or garments worn which includes the use of gloves, gown, mask, face shield, when anticipating coming in contact with blood, body fluids or other communicable toxins or agents) when providing suprapubic catheter change for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) who was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs - bacteria that are resistant to more than one antibiotic and can cause serious infections in nursing facilities).This deficient practice has a potential for Resident 1 risk for acquiring and transmitting infection to other residents, staff and visitors in the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record , the admission record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a physician after a significant change (COC- a sudden clinically important decline from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional abilities) in the mental or physical condition of a resident who had abnormal laboratory (lab) results for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1)This deficient practice could have resulted in in the worsening of Resident 1's symptoms such as pain and sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection).During a review of the admission record for Resident 1indicated Resident 1was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where the brain does not function properly due to an underlying metabolic disturbance), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of history and physical (H&P- is a thorough assessment a doctor does to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility failed to meet professional standards of quality by failing to ensure that one of four sampled residents (Resident 1)'s medications were administered in accordance with the physician's orders, including any required time frame according to facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Administering MedicationsThis deficient practice increased the risk for accidents and jeopardized resident's health and safety by failing to administer necessary medications in accordance with the physician order.Findings:During a review of the admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified convulsions (sudden, involuntary muscle spasms that can affect the whole body or a part of it), sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection) and congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling).During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to notify the physician when Resident 1 complained of pain and staff observed sediments in Resident 1's indwelling urinary catheter (foley catheter - a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine).This deficient practice had the potential to result in urinary tract infections and urinary complications for Resident 1.Findings:During a review of the admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including UTI, sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection) and congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling).During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident assessment tool) dated 9/10/2025 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for resident rights by failing to inform the resident's Responsible Party (RP, person who agrees to handle the resident's affairs)/Power of Attorney (POA, a legal document where a person (the principal) appoints an agent to make decisions for them when they are unable to do so themselves) about a change in the resident's medication dosage for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health and care.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 11/14/25 indicated, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including; muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), hyperlipidemia (HLD - a condition characterized by elevated levels of lipids (fats) in the bloodstream), and hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland doesn't produce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 72543(b) Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records for one out of three residents (Resident 1) in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices by ensuring accurate documentation. This failure resulted in the facility's failure to reflect Resident 1's condition and care services provided across all disciplines when Resident 1 had a Change of Condition (COC- a sudden clinically important decline from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional abilities) as transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 8/3/2025.During a review of the admission record for Resident 3 indicated Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including left and right rim of pubis (bone located in the front part of the pelvis [bony structure inside your hips, buttocks and pubic region]) fractures (break in bone), cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke - is the death of brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1) Ensure staffing information on the Direct Hours Patient Day (DHPPD - a list of staff hours of direct daily care) form was completed and posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors daily. 2) Ensure daily staffing (DHPPD) form was completed and available to the public for review upon request. 3) Maintain/Retain records of the posted daily nurse staffing (DHPPD) data for a minimum of 18 months. These deficient practices misinformed all 63 residents, families, and visitors about the facility's daily nurse staffing data. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 03/20/2025 at 2:40 PM with the Director Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated DSD was responsible in filling out the DHPPD. The DSD stated the DHPPD forms for 10/11/2024, 10/12/2024, and 3/9/2025 forms were missing. The DSD stated facility should post the DHPPD form every morning and keep the records for 18 months. The DSD also stated DHPPD form should be reviewed and signed by DON or Designee and the records should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure all opened food items stored in one out of three reach-in refrigerators were labeled with the name of the food item, open date, and expiration date. 2. Have a room thermometer in the dry storage area. These deficient practices placed all sixty three facility residents at risk for foodborne illness which could lead to serious infections and death. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/2025 at 7:50 AM with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the facility's Reach-In Refrigerator #3 had 3 halved avocados wrapped in saran wrap. The opened avocados were not labeled with an opened date, expiration date or name of the food item. The DS stated opened avocados should be kept more than two days. The DS further stated the avocados were not labeled and are required to be once opened. The DS also stated we date opened items so that we know when it was opened and when to discard them in order to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the industrial washing machine used to wash the facility linen and residents including clothing was not leaking. This deficient practices had the potential to result in a significant delay in providing clean and sanitary linen for 63 of 63 medically compromised residents who depend on staff to provide a homelike environment. In addition to allowing easy access and exit to and from the dining hall for residents that chose to eat in the dining hall. Findings: During observation of the laundry room on 3/20/25 at 9:36 AM, there was a red bucket with towels placed under the bucket on the floor. The bucket was used to catch water leaking from the washing machine creating a medium to large size puddle next to and around the immediate area of the laundry machine. During an interview on 3/20/25 at 9:38 AM, Laundry Supervisor (LS) stated LS was not sure how long the laundry machine has been leaking for and that LS needed to check with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) regarding same. LS stated MS takes care of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The floor in laundry room walkway did not have holes and was not cracked. 2. The door leading to the resident dining hall was operational and functional. These deficient practices had the potential for injury to residents, staff, and guests, and interfere with the residents, staff, guests to safely enter or exit through the door. Findings: 1. During observation of the laundry room on 3/20/25 at 9:36 AM, the floor in front of the industrial laundry machine was cracked and had medium to large size holes in the concrete floor just in front of the washing machine. During an interview on 3/20/25 at 9:38 AM Laundry Supervisor (LS) stated the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) takes care of all repairs. The LS stated he was not aware of how long the floor have been in disrepair either because, the MS handles all the repairs in the facility. During an interview on 3/20/25 at 10:16 AM, MS stated MS was considering replacing the floor by pouring concrete on the floor instead of the ceramic tiles that currently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's written notice of transfer was provided to the resident's responsible party as soon as practicable for one (1) out of the three residents (Resident 13). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident's responsible party being unaware on the resident's status and whereabouts, on how to contact the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (public advocate), and on how to appeal the transfer if necessary. Findings: During a record review, Resident 13's admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted Resident 13 on 12/27/2014, and readmitted the resident on 11/28/2024, with diagnoses including ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease-irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a record review, Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 12/3/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 30) had bilateral floor mats per the physician order and the resident's high risk for falls and injury care planned interventions. This deficient practice placed Residents 30 at risk for injury. Findings: During a record review, Resident 30's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 30 on 11/5/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), muscle weakness (a lack of strength in the muscles), abnormalities of gait and mobility (when the pattern in which you walk and move is not normal) and atrial fibrillation (AFib - an irregular heartbeat that can lead to blood clots and increases the risk of stroke and other heart complications) . During a record review, Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 2/8/2025, indicated Resident 30 had moderate impaired cognition (ability to think, understand, and reason). The MDS further indicated Resident 30 required supervision to moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label enteral hydration for one of sixteen sampled residents (Resident 162). These deficient practices had the potential to cause complications associated with enteral (delivery of nutrients or medications through the gastrointestinal tract, via a tube.) feeding, including infection and/or possible hospitalization. Findings: During a record review, Resident 162's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 162 on 3/17/2025 with diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (deficiency of both protein and energy [calories] in the diet, leading to a weight loss of 75% (percent) to 85% of expected weight for length or height), gastrostomy status (a surgical opening, or stoma, directly into the stomach), adult failure to thrive (decline in older adults, characterized by weight loss, poor nutrition, decreased appetite, and inactivity, often accompanied by dehydration, depression, impaired immune function, and low cholesterol), methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (MRSA- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) was properly supervised and monitored for safety after the facility was notified of Resident 1's Family Member 2's (FM 2) had a case order with the Adult Protective Services (APS - a social services program focused on helping elderly adults and adults with disabilities live with dignity and respect by investigating allegations of abuse, neglect, self-neglect and exploitation). This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk of abuse and neglect. Cross reference to F656 Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease-irreversible kidney failure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and orderly discharge from the facility to home for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Properly discharge Resident 1's without completing a pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessment after resident's dialysis treatment on 12/30/2024. 2. Complete a discharge plan summary upon Resident 1's discharge to home on [DATE]. 3. Complete an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a group of dedicated healthcare professionals who work to bring knowledge together to help residents receive the care they need) meeting for Resident 1's discharge planning according to facility's policy and procedure (P&P). These deficient practices had the potential to result in incomplete or ineffective discharge planning and can lead to lack of necessary care for Resident 1 after discharge. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including ESRD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure that a comprehensive (CP) was developed after the facility was notified that Resident 1's Family Member 2 (FM 2) have a case order with the Adult Protective Services (APS - a social services program focused on helping elderly adults and adults with disabilities live with dignity and respect by investigating allegations of abuse, neglect, self-neglect and exploitation). This deficient practice had the potential to result negative impact on residents' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Cross Reference F600. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease-irreversible kidney failure), chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) by failing to ensure Resident 3 felt safe and comfortable inside Resident 3's room. Resident 3's roommate (Resident 2) was constantly screaming and cursing. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the psychosocial well-being of Resident 3 and had the potential to delay necessary care for Resident 3. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), anxiety, depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a grievance involving one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was completed per the facility policy by failing to: 1. Ensure a prompt effort to resolve Resident 1's family members (R1FM) grievance when R1FM expressed issues against Resident 1's roommate (Resident 2). 2. Ensure facility staff report all alleged violations (neglect, abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and/or misappropriation of resident property). These deficient practices violated R1FM's right to have grievance addressed and had a potential to delay any necessary care and services for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lack of coordination, diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]) and dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of an abuse in accordance with state and federal law involving one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the State Agency (SA) to ensure the safety of the residents and had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility as well as failure to protect residents from any possible abuse. Cross Reference F610. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including lack of coordination, diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]) and dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse policies and procedures to ensure an investigation was completed for any reasonable suspicion of an abuse in accordance with state and federal law for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the State Agency (SA) to ensure the safety of the residents and had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility as well as failure to protect residents from any possible abuse. Cross Reference F609. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including lack of coordination, diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]) and dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of storing, preparing, distributing, and serving food in accordance with professional standards and its policies for food service when: 1) Multiple food items in the kitchen did not bear a label indicating a use-by date in accordance with the policy. 2) Multiple food items were expired or did not have an open date. These deficiencies had the potential to result in food-borne illness in medically vulnerable residents who consumed the food prepared by the facility kitchen. Findings: During an observation and a concurrent interview with Dietary Supervisor (DS), on 3/12/2024 at 8:30 AM, the following were observed: 1. A container of dill weed had an expiration date of 2/25/24. 2. A container containing beans did not have a use by label. 3. A bag of green lentils did not have a used by label. 4. A gallon of milk did not have an open date or expiration date. 5. A container containing prunes did not indicate a use by date. 6. A container containing peaches did not have any labels indicating use by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a change of condition (COC) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 13), who was readmitted from a general acute care hospital (GACH) with significant weight loss. As a result, a physician was not notified of Resident 13's weight loss, which placed Resident 13 at risk for further weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 13's admission Record, indicated Resident 13 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including thrombocytopenia (low platelet level), elevated white blood cell count (measures the number of white cells in the blood), end stage renal disease (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), chronic respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood), muscle weakness, dysphagia (inability to swallow), type 2 diabetes (body's inability to process blood sugar), depression (loss of pleasure or interest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe homelike environment for eight ambulatory residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents falling in the hallway due to uneven surfaces in the facility hallways and resident rooms. The area of the floor was slightly raised potentially leading to a tripping hazard for the residents in the facility. Cross Reference F919 Findings: During an observation on 11/6/2023 at 8 AM., the hallway floor in front of Resident rooms 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, and 16, and in Nurses' Station 2, had bulged up area. During an interview on 3/13/2024 at 12:06 PM., Maintenance Supervisor (MS) stated that MS had spoken to the Administrator concerning the bulges floor outside rooms Resident rooms 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, and 16. MS stated the Administrator (ADM) was aware the floor had uneven surface with air bubbles, causing the floor to bulge. MS stated MS attempted to take out the bubble by cutting the tiles and allowing the air to escape; however, that did not work, and the floor remained uneven with small to medium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of five residents (Resident 49), who was placed on a psychotropic medication (medication that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior). This deficient practice had a potential for Resident 49 to not receive appropriate care and treatment related to the specific use of psychotropic medication. Findings: A review of Resident 49's admission Record, indicated Resident 49 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (elevated blood sugar), lack of coordination, hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), retention of urine (inability to urinate), transient ischemic attack (a short period of symptoms similar to a stroke), cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physicians order for oxygen supplementation for one of six sampled residents (Resident 119). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate treatment of oxygen delivery, placing Resident 118 at risk to experience shortness of breath and/or hypoxia (a state in which oxygen is not available in sufficient amounts at the tissue level to maintain adequate homeostasis) Findings: A review of Resident 118's admission Record, indicated Resident 118 was initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), anxiety disorder (persistent worry), depression (a mood disorder characterized by feelings sadness), anemia (low blood red blood cells), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), chronic respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication in accordance with physician's orders and care plans for one out of eight sampled residents (Residents 58). As a result, Resident 58 suffered burning pain level 9 out of 10 (9/10 - numerical pain assessment tool where zero is no pain and 10 is severe pain) to the left leg for two hours. Cross reference to F919 Findings: A review of Resident 58's admission Record dated 3/13/2024, indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 58 on 10/18/2022 with diagnoses that included toxic encephalopathy, (a brain dysfunction caused by toxic (poisonous substances) exposure), muscle weakness (a lack of physical or muscle strength, throughout the body, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and hemiplegia, (paralysis (is when you are not able to move some or all your body) that affects only one side of your body) affecting the left side of the body. A review of Resident 58's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 1/17/2024, indicated Resident 58 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. 2) Make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time. 3) Make daily staffing available to the public for review upon request. 4) Maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months. Findings: During an observation on 3/12/2024 at 12:50 PM, the nurse staffing data information was not posted anywhere in the facility visible to residents and visitors. During an observation on 3/13/2024 at 9:50 AM, the nurse staffing data information was not posted anywhere in the facility visible to residents and visitors. During an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/15/2024 at 4:22 PM, DON was asked why the required daily nurse staffing data was not posted at the Nurse's Station 1 where it would be visible to residents and visitors. DON stated the facility posted Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up and communicate with a physician the consultant pharmacist's recommendation to perform blood tests for two of three sampled residents (Residents 49 and 51) in accordance with facility's policy titled Medication Regime Reviews. This deficient practice had the potential to result in missed opportunity to correct identified irregularities regarding prescribed medications for Residents 49 and 51. Findings: A review of Resident 49's admission Record, indicated Resident 49 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (elevated blood sugar), lack of coordination, hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), retention of urine (inability to urinate), transient ischemic attack ( a short period of symptoms similar to a stroke), cerebral infarction (occurs as a result of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a safe water management program to prevent water borne diseases including legionnaire's disease (a serious type of pneumonia, can occur in persons who inhale water droplets contaminated with the bacterium Legionella). This deficient practice had the potential to spread water borne illnesses including legionnaire's disease in the facility. Findings: During an interview on 11/7/23 at 2:18 AM with Maintenance Supervisor (MS). MS stated MS was not aware of any water management program. However, MS stated MS had tested the water temperatures and kept a log of his activity. The MS stated MS did not know about any water testing program. During an interview on 3/14/2024 at 9:20 AM, Infection Preventionist (IP) stated, currently maintenance increases water temperature to kill bacteria such as legionella. MS stated all the shower heads are changed every three months and IP tests the water twice a month. MS stated MS checks/tests daily water temperatures daily and completes water testing monthly. IP stated water tests are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pneumonia (PNA-infection of one or both lungs) vaccines was offered and/or re-offered to one of six sampled residents (Resident 29) per facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccination. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 29 at risk of acquiring and transmitting pneumonia infection. Findings: A review of Resident 29's admission Record, indicated Resident 29 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including elevated white blood cell count (a white blood cell count measures the number of white cells in the blood), retention of urine, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings), neuroleptic induced parkinsonism (drug induced parkinsonism), mild cognitive impairment (problems with a person's ability to think), tremors (a condition that affects the nervous system), hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol), hypertension (elevated blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 19 out of 29 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ,8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents and working space for the health care givers. Findings: During an observation on 3/15/2024, at 5:28 p.m., all rooms listed on the facility's room waiver letter were observed that enough space was provided for the care of the residents, and that the privacy curtains were provided privacy for each resident, and that the rooms had direct access to the corridors. The facility submitted a written request for a continued waiver. On 7/17/2024, the Department (State Survey Agency) reviewed updated room waiver letter, dated 7/17/2024, submitted by the administrator, indicating resident rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to implement dish washing cleaning and sanitizing procedures while cleaning cups, plates, lids, and utensils for 64 of 64 Residents. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses (food poisoning) of the residents with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and could lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: On 11/28/2023 during an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a complaint regarding an allegation of poor dietary sanitation. On 11/28/2023 at 9:50am during an observation and concurrent interview, Dietary Aide (DA) was observed stacking drinking cups, and plate lids with breakfast food residue on to disk racks and placing them into the dishwasher and sanitizer without first rinsing off the food particles off the cups and plates lids. DA collected the washed and sanitized cups and plate lids, some of which still contained food residue and placed them on to a clean shelf to air dry.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for two of six sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4) by failing to ensure the nasal cannula (NC -a connector attached to oxygen) tubing was changed per policy. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to develop respiratory infection. Findings: 1. A review of admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonia (lung infection that inflames air sacs with fluid or pus), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquid) and difficulty in walking. A review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 7/31/2023, indicated Resident 3 ' s cognition level (action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily decision-making was intact and required supervision to limited assistance from staff for activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the licensed pharmacist's recommendation to change the prescribed form of fluphenazine HCL (an antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia and psychotic symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, and hostility, HCL[Hydrochloride]: short acting) to fluphenazine Deconate (long acting) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 missing two doses of the medication placing the resident at risk for a decline in mental condition, functional condition, or psychosocial status. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person ' s ability to think, feel and behave clearly), depression (a mental disorder causing a depresses mood), and agoraphobia (fear of places and situations that might cause panic). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was accuracy for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's Treatment Administration Records (TARs) and Medication Administration Records (MARs) indicated that care and treatment was provided while Resident 1 was not at the facility. This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate information entered into Resident 1's medical record. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission's record (Facesheet) indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 1 on 6/21/2023 and readmitted the resident on 7/15/2023 with diagnoses including hyperosmolality and hypernatremia (a condition in which the blood has a high concentration of salt (sodium), glucose, and other substances. This draws the water out of the body's other organs, including the brain), dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing, as a symptom of disease), and muscle weakness (decreased strength of the muscles, affecting both distal and proximal musculature). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its ' visitation policy was in compliance with the federal regulation to not limit resident visitation hours. This deficient practice had the potential to violate the residents rights of being able to receive visitors at the facility and could affect the residents ' mental health and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: During on observation on 8/4/23 at 12:25 pm, a sign posted on facility ' s lobby door indicating Please note facility visitation hours below: Monday through Sunday: 10:00 am – 8:00 pm . Visitation appointment must be at least 24 hours in advance .No walk-ins allowed. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 8/4/23 at 1:15 pm with the Administrator (ADM), the facility ' s policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Visitation (undated) was reviewed. The P&P indicated, Current visitation hours are from 10:00 am to 8:00 pm with a 1-hour limit for in-room visits. The ADM verified the policy and stated the facility is not limiting visitation. During a review of the Department of Health &…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 19 out of 29 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms.This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents and working space for the health care givers.Findings:During an observation and interview on 3/18/2025, at 9:08 a.m., all rooms listed on the facility's room waiver letter were observed that enough space was provided for the care of the residents, and that the privacy curtains were provided privacy for each resident, and that the rooms had direct access to the corridors. Resident 264 her room size was adequate and that she liked her room.A review of the facility room waiver letter to Department (State Survey Agency) received and reviewed updated room waiver letter, dated 3/18/2025, submitted by the administrator, indicated resident rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$55,450 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $55,450 — penalty dated 2024-03-15
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-12 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASMS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 03/11/2020 |
| BRADSHAW, PETER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/07/2023 |
| ELSNER, ERIC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/11/2020 |
| KIRKWOOD, JARED | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/11/2020 |
| ORGILL, CRAIG | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/11/2020 |
| PARTI, RAJESH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/11/2020 |
| PARTI, SHRUTY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/11/2020 |
| PAXMAN, MARCUS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| CASLMON, TIMOTHY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| THOMPSON, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BRADSHAW, JEFFREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| NEGAPATAN, MAY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2022 |
| YANG, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/10/2021 |
| 1330 17TH STREET, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/15/2018 |
| ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| EAST WEST BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/11/2020 |
| JACARANDA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| MOSS ADAMS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/11/2020 |
| BRADY, VERN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| CASE, RYAN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| DAROUIAN, NAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| JURADO, FRANK | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $780K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055155. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.