No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverwood Health Care

5320 Carrington Circle, Stockton, CA 95210 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (209) 473-3004 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (209) 473-3004 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 20262 actual-harm citations$47,637 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $47,637 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-20)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1507 E March Ln · (209) 472-7100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1189 E March Ln · (209) 235-1264 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1189 E March Ln · (209) 235-2047 · Call to confirm hours
Park
614 Elaine Dr · (209) 937-8206 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.0%7.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.5%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.7%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.232.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.241.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 224 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 54% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.0%CMS range 54.2–68.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 7.2–11.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 4.8–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
26.3%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 89.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-12)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care services, immediate ongoing clinical assessment, treatment, and identified changes in condition as per professional standards of practice for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when,1. LVN (Licensed Vocational Nurse) 1 did not notify the Physician of Resident 1's change in condition when he had shortness of breath and low oxygen saturation level on [DATE],2. LVN 1 increased Resident 1's oxygen therapy from 2 liters to 4 liters without a Physician's order, 3. LVN 1 adjusted Resident 1's oxygen liter flow and did not escalate Resident 1's care to a qualified healthcare professional, not following their scope of practice, and,4. Hospital discharge orders for Resident 1's weekly CBC were not transcribed over and were not followed.These failures resulted in physician not being aware of Resident 1's change in condition, delay in adequate assessment with potential of need for higher level of care not being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) who were at risk for elopement (the act of leaving a facility unsupervised and without prior authorization), had implemented elopement prevention measures in place when: 1. Resident 1 had exit seeking behaviors on [DATE] but orders for a wander guard device (an alarm that alerts the facility when a wandering resident tries to leave the facility unattended) and monitoring for wandering behavior were not initiated according to Resident 1's care plan , and an elopement risk assessment was not completed; and, 2. Resident 1 ' s wander guard was not working when the elopement happened on [DATE]; and, 3. Resident 1 ' s charting for monitoring wander guard placement (where the device is on the body) was not consistently documented for the months of [DATE] and [DATE]; and, 4. Resident 3 ' s wander guard was found to be expired while being worn. These failures led to Resident 1 ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to exercise reasonable care to protect the personal property of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from potential loss when Resident 1's Inventory of Personal Effects (a list of a resident's personal belongings) had not been updated since 10/28/20, continued to list hearing aids that were no longer available for Resident 1's use, and did not accurately reflect Resident 1's current clothing. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's personal property to not be adequately safeguarded and accounted for, placing Resident 1's personal belongings at risk for loss or misplacement.Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including mood disorder (a mental health condition that affects a person's emotions and behavior), psychosis (a mental health condition that can cause difficulty recognizing what is real), and bilateral hearing loss (reduced hearing in both ears).Review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when:1. Resident 1's skin conditions during the nurse's required weekly long-term care evaluations (Weekly Summary - a weekly nursing assessment used to evaluate and document changes in a resident's condition based on a comprehensive assessment of the resident), completed on 2/13/26 and 2/20/26, were not identified and documented. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's weekly long-term care evaluation, due on 5/1/26, was completed; and,2. The facility staff failed to implement the communication care plan intervention to assist with hearing aid placement and maintenance for Resident 1.These failures resulted in inaccurate assessments being added to Resident 1's health care record, and had the potential to delay treatment, and implementation of resident-specific interventions, increasing the risk for skin breakdown, infection, and further skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse (intentional act of causing injury or trauma to another person through bodily contact) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when on 3/3/26 Resident 1 became upset, started yelling at Resident 2 and hit Resident 2 on the back of the head with a fist. This failure had the potential to cause physical injury and psychosocial distress (anxiety, depression, fear, social withdrawal, or behavioral changes) to Resident 2.Findings:A review of Resident 2's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to epilepsy (chronic brain disorder characterized by a tendency to have recurring, unprovoked seizures), depression (long lasting mood disorder that goes beyond feeling sad), muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and traumatic brain injury (a brain injury caused by a sudden external physical force like being hit in the head).A review of Resident 2's minimum data set (MDS -a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse for two of two sampled residents when:1. The facility did not complete a thorough interview of a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) witness who had reported an argument between Resident 1 and Resident 2 to the Licensed Nurse (LN) on 3/3/26, prior to Resident 1 hitting Resident 2;2. The facility's investigation did not reveal information regarding Resident 1's behavior, and incidents that showed arguments between Resident 1 and Resident 2 or interviews from staff with knowledge of them; and,3. The Director of Nursing (DON) was tasked with the responsibility of completing the investigation by the previous Administrator, even though the DON had never completed an investigation before.These failures prevented the implementation of interventions (specific, purposeful actions performed by healthcare professionals to address a resident's needs, prevent complications, and achieve established, measurable goals) to protect Resident 1 from being hit by Resident 2. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan including the interventions and instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care as per professional standards of quality care was developed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with oxygen therapy and an oxygen care plan was not developed for Resident 1. This failure had the potential to receive inadequate respiratory care for Resident 1.Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection usually caused by bacteria that spread through the bloodstream, nearby tissues, or open injuries), sepsis (a life threatening body's extreme response to an infection causing tissue damage), cellulitis and abscess of mouth (a common, potentially serious bacteria skin infection and underlying tissues, often causing rapid-spreading redness, warmth, swelling, and pain), diabetes type 2 (a chronic condition where the body resist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe food storage and preparation, as well as maintain kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 87 residents who ate facility prepared meals when:1. Over ripe and spoiled produce was available for use in the walk-in refrigerator; 2. Black small bugs were found crawling on the onions and flying within the container that encompassed the onions; 3. Cutting boards and tray line pans were found with food particles, black, and brown colored substances on them; and,4. Several pots, pans, bowls, and trays were found stacked wet (in ready-to-use areas).These failures had the potential to put residents who ate the facility prepared meals at risk for foodborne illnesses.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/9/25, at 8:18 AM in the walk-in refrigerator with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the following items were observed available for use and the following findings were confirmed with the DSS: a. Approximately 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 5 out of 41 facility rooms when window blinds were broken in Residents rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]).These failures removed residents' rights to a dignified homelike environment, with the potential to result in psychosocial harm.Findings:During an observation on 9/09/25, at 10:58 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], the window blinds were observed to be broken.During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/09/25, at 12:59 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 confirmed the window blinds were broken. LN 3 stated broken blinds were a dignity issue for the residents. LN 3 confirmed window blinds had spaces when they were closed and anyone could have looked inside room [ROOM NUMBER] from outside the window. LN 3 further stated there was a lack of privacy when window blinds were missing.During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe handling of Hazardous drugs (or HD, drugs that have the potential to cause harm to healthcare workers or patients when not handled properly), safe use of resident care devices (small devices that measure blood pressure (or BP, the force exerted by the blood on the walls of the arteries as it flows through the body) or heart beat), and timely measurement of blood sugar levels, based on standards of practice with a resident census of 87, when:Hazardous medications were not consistently labeled as hazardous to alert nursing staff on safe handling as observed during Resident 56's medication administration, and during a medication cart inspection for Resident 42, Resident 16, and Resident 76.Staff's personal blood pressure devices were used when the facility's blood pressure device malfunctioned during a medication administration observation for Resident 92.Resident 5's blood sugar was measured after Resident 5 consumed most of her meal tray but the doctor's order indicated the sugar level to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe pharmaceutical services with a resident census of 87 when:Emergency medication Kits (Ekit, a supply of prescription medication reserved for emergency use when needed) use, opening, and its contents were not accounted for in the IV medication Ekit (Intravenous, into the vein) and refrigerator medication Ekit in the main medication room.Facility staff's personal purse was stored in the medication room counter-top where prescription and controlled drugs (drugs that required doctor's prescription and subject to abuse) were stored.Pharmaceutical delivery records for prescription and controlled drugs were not signed and reviewed by licensed staff upon delivery. These failed practices could contribute to lack of accountability and risk of drug diversion (diversion is unauthorized use of drugs).Findings:During a concurrent interview and inspection of facility's main medication room, accompanied by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), on 9/9/25 at 10:39 AM, two opened Ekits,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention practices were implemented and followed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the spread of infection with a resident census of 87 when: 1. The facility stored a resident's kidney basin with clean dishes in the kitchen, creating a risk of cross-contamination; 2. Dietary staff failed to follow infection control practices of hand hygiene during tray line service; 3. Shared glucometer devices (a device used to measure blood sugar) were not cleaned and disinfected in-between resident care per manufacturer's specification for Resident 5 and Resident 105; and,4. A pill cutter was not cleaned before and after each use for Resident 108. These failed practices had the potential to place the residents at risk for developing an infection and the potential to result in the spread of the infection within the facility. These lapses in infection prevention and control practices placed the residents at risk for avoidable harm.1. Findings: 1. During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff treated residents with dignity and respect for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 40) when staff referred to Resident 40 as a feeder during care, rather than addressing the resident by name or in a manner that upheld his dignity. This failure had the potential to demean Resident 40, negatively impact his self-esteem, and compromise Resident 40's right to be treated with dignity and respect. Findings:During a review of Resident 40's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and anxiety disorder (a condition in which a person has excessive worry, feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness).During an observation on 9/9/25, at 11:59 a.m., in Resident 40's room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 was observed helping CNA 2 to provide care to Resident 40. CNA 3 stated to CNA 2, He [Resident 40] is a feeder now? During an interview on 9/9/25, at 12 p.m. with CNA 3, CNA 3 stated that staff should not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage and use of a resident's personal medication for 1 of 14 residents observed during a medication pass (Resident 102) when over the counter medications (OTC, a medication that can be obtained without prescription) and supplements (pills that provide nutrients like vitamins, minerals and herbs that may be missing from a person's daily food intake) were found at Resident 102's bedside without a physician's order.This failure had the potential to result in unsafe and/or unauthorized use of OTC medications and/or supplements that could have resulted in illness or injury to Resident 102 and/or other residents in the facility. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/9/25, at 12:15 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, the following OTC medications and supplements were found at Resident 102's bedside:Two yellow capped bottles of a product labeled as Sualin, Natural cough and Cold Remedy, contained three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of residents' personal information for a census of 81 when licensed nurse (LN) 8 left residents personal medical information unattended on the computer screen visible to anyone who walked by in the facility's dining room.This failure had the potential for misuse of residents personal information including identity theft. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview in the facility's dining room on 9/9/25 at 12:15 PM, a computer was observed unattended with a residents medical information visible. Once LN 8 returned, they closed the computer and stated prior to stepping away from the computer the lock screen button should have been pressed to protect the residents privacy. LN 8 stated the purpose of locking the screen was to protect the resident's information from anyone accessing it who was not authorized. LN 8 stated that not protecting the residents health information places them at risk for identity theft.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/12/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices in two of four Medication carts (a mobile cart that holds patient medications and supplies), in one out one treatment carts (a mobile cart that holds medical and wound treatment supplies) and in one out of one medication rooms (a locked room used to store medications and supplies) with a resident census of 87 when:1.Medication cart in hallway #2 stored an undated Humalog insulin pen (drug used for blood sugar disease in a pen shape product) 2.Main medication room stored two opened vials of Aplisol (same as Tuberculin Purified Protein, use to test for TB, or tuberculosis, a serious lung infection) which was not dated when it was first opened. The medication room stored an opened and undated eye drop bottle called Timolol (or Timoptic, used to treat eye disease). 3.Treatment cart in hallway #2 stored opened sterile (free from germs) wound care supplies and/or products without any expiration date (the date that product was no longer should be used).These failures had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespread
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure communication among staff when resident personal health information (PHI) was communicated via a facility approved group messaging platform (GMP, a smart phone (a mobile phone that performs many of the functions of a computer) free messaging application that lets users call and exchange texts, photos audio, and video messages with others across) on facility staff's personal smart phones based on regulatory requirements (HIPAA-Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, a set of federal rules requiring appropriate safeguards to protect the privacy of protected health information from disclosure without patient's consent) for a census of 88 residents. This unsafe practice could compromise residents' private medical information and violate residents' health information privacy and confidentiality. Findings: During an interview on 5/13/25, at 2:10 p.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 stated she was told at change of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for safe injection practices were followed when: 1. The Infection Preventionist (IP) stored pre-drawn, unlabeled, and undated flu (influenza, a respiratory disease) vaccine syringes in the staff food refrigerator. 2. Pneumonia vaccines (a vaccine that helps prevent an elderly resident get pneumonia, a serious lung infection) for three residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) were documented as given, when the actual products were found among medication stored for destruction in the staffs ' food refrigerator. These failures could contribute to unsafe and ineffective use of vaccines and subsequent adverse outcomes for residents and staff. Findings: A concurrent interview with the facility ' s Director of Staff Development (DSD), in her office, and inspection of a dorm-style refrigerator next to her desk, on 10/10/24, at 3:45 PM, revealed stored food items/drinks in addition to a drawer full of injectable (shot into skin or vein) medications and 14 unlabeled pre-drawn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication use and destruction practices in the facility with a census of 86 when: 1. Prescription medication destruction and disposition logs (Refers to paperwork that outlines the process for permanently getting rid of medications, including when and how they were destroyed) were not dated, witnessed and/or cosigned by licensed staff. 2. A discontinued medication called semaglutide (injectable drug used to treat blood sugar disease and for weight loss) prescribed to Resident 4 was stored in an active storage area in the main medication room after Resident 4 was discharged and included two boxes (prescriptions) of semaglutide. (One prescription was brought in by the family, and the second was delivered by the facility ' s pharmacy (Pharmacy A). 3. Three Pneumonia vaccines (an injectable vaccine that helps prevent an elderly resident from getting pneumonia, a serious lung infection) belonging to three different residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3), were found among other medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices in the facility with a census of 86 when: A dorm style refrigerator in an office shared by the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Infection Preventionist (IP) and the staffing coordinator, contained personal food items and a drawer full of prescription injectable (shot into skin or veins) medications including vaccines and unlabeled pre-drawn syringes of a flu (or influenza, a respiratory infection) vaccine. There was no temperature monitoring performed for this refrigerator. The refrigerator in the main medication room stored: 1. Opened vials of flu vaccine and Tuberculosis testing agent (or TB, a serious lung infection) without any marking for a beyond use date (the date after which the drug should not be used). 2. Discontinued medications belonging to a discharged resident (Resident 4) were stored in an active storage area in the refrigerator. These failures could contribute to unsafe medication storage, the risk of drug diversion (unauthorize use of drugs) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of a facility-initiated discharge (notice given to resident to find another place to live in 30 days ' time) for one of one sampled residents (Resident 2) when, Resident 2 ' s Responsible Party (RP, a designated person to make decisions for another person) was verbally notified of Resident 2 ' s discharge from the facility on 9/5/24, however a written notice of discharge document was not sent/given to Resident 2's RP. This failure resulted in Resident 2's RP being uninformed of how to appeal the decision of a facility-initiated discharge and removed the opportunity for Resident 2's RP and/or the ombudsman (advocate for residents) to advocate on Resident 2's behalf. Findings: During an interview by phone with Resident 2 ' s RP on 9/23/24 at 12:40 p.m., the RP stated that the facility staff called her and verbally informed her that Resident 2 was sent to the hospital by ambulance on 9/5/24. The RP stated that the facility also told her that Resident 2 was discharged from the facility at that time. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to determine if one of one sampled resident (Resident 2) could return to the facility following a transfer to an acute care hospital from the facility when, Resident 2 was sent to an acute care hospital on 9/5/24 from the facility and not allowed to return; 1. There was no documented evidence that the facility communicated with the hospital (communication with the hospital and nursing home staff and/or via visits to the acute care hospital to assess the resident ' s condition) to determine an accurate status of Resident 2 ' s condition at the time the acute care hospital attempted to discharge Resident 2 back to the facility; and 2. There was no documented evidence that the facility attempted to communicate with the acute care hospital the needs of Resident 2 to return to the facility (treatments, medications, and/or services) to determine if the facility could meet those needs or not. These failures had the potential to negatively impact Resident 2 ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5%. There were two errors out of 26 opportunities, which resulted in a 7.69% medication error rate for 2 (Resident #23 and Resident #82) of 5 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration (General), dated 08/18/2022, indicated, 4. Medications shall be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #23 on 02/23/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/05/2024, revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #23's Order Summary Report, revealed an order dated 02/23/2024, for multivitamin with minerals oral tablet, give one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to hold carvedilol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure) when a resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the top number in a blood pressure [BP] reading) was below 130 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and to not administer midodrine (a medication used to treat low blood pressure) when the SBP was above 120 mmHg for 1 (Resident #21) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration (General), dated 08/18/2022, indicated, Policy To be able to safely administer in a timely manner, and as prescribed, in accordance to nursing scope and practices. The policy indicated, 4. Medication shall be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #21 on 03/03/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of end stage renal disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhance barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented for 1 (Resident #196) of 18 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precaution, dated 04/05/2024, indicated, 4. Facility staff shall perform hand hygiene and will don [put on] gown and gloves before performing the following high-contact resident care activities: * Dressing. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #196 on 07/17/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of encounter for fitting and adjustment of other gastrointestinal appliance and device, gastrostomy status, and dysphagia. Resident #196's Order Summary Report indicated an order dated 07/18/2024, for enhanced standard precautions related to gastrostomy tube every shift. Resident #196's care plan, included a focus area initiated on 07/18/2024, that indicated the resident was at risk for aspiration and required a feeding tube. During an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality, when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) physician order to reduce gabapentin (medication used to treat nerve pain) was not carried out on 4/6/24. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving medication as per her physician's order and had the potential for ineffective treatment and unwanted side effects of the medication. Findings: Review of an admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including but not limited to surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system and diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar levels). Review of Resident 1's physician note dated 4/6/24, indicated .Taper off [reduce] gabapentin to 300mg [milligram: unit of measurement] PO [per oral] daily per patient request. Discussed with RN [Registered Nurse] . Review of Resident 1's active physician's orders indicated Resident 1 had an active order for gabapentin 400 mg 1 capsule by mouth every eight hours for neuropathy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate self-determination for five (Resident 1, Resident 76, Resident 331, Resident 335 and Resident 337) of 12 yellow zone (designated area where newly admitted or readmitted residents are kept under observation/quarantine for 14 days for possible COVID-19 infection) residents, when: 1. Resident 1, Resident 76, Resident 331 and Resident 337 were kept in the yellow zone for longer than the required 14-day quarantine period, and, 2. Fully vaccinated residents, Resident 335 and Resident 337 were unnecessarily placed on quarantine in the yellow zone. This failure had the potential to cause psychosocial harm to Resident 1, Resident 76, Resident 331, Resident 335 and Resident 337. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 76's admission record indicated Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide resident care) dated 6/4/21 indicated Resident 76 had intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-18 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' right to visitation, when unvaccinated or partially vaccinated (individuals not fully protected from COVID-19 infection) residents or families were denied indoor visitation. This failure had the potential to negatively impact physical and emotional well-being of residents. Findings: Review of Resident 331's admission record indicated Resident 331 was admitted to the facility in late May 2021. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide resident care) dated 6/5/21, indicated Resident 331 had intact cognition. During an interview with Resident 331 on 6/15/21 at 12:16 p.m., Resident 331 stated the facility did not allow his friends to visit him. He said the facility gave him a contact number for his friends to call to schedule the visit. Resident 331 stated when his friends called, the facility told them that they cannot see him. He said his friends come to visit him at the front through a glass barrier. During an interview with the Activities Director (AD) on 6/16/21, at 9:20 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled appropriately for six residents from a census of 76 residents (Resident 21, Resident 13, Resident 46, Resident 381, Resident 56, and Resident 27) when: 1. Resident 56's insulin (a medication used to lower blood sugar levels) and Resident 27's inhalers (a medication used to treat lung disease) were stored on medication cart number four after they were discharged from the facility; 2. Resident 21's eye drops were stored in the refrigerator at a temperature not recommended by the manufacturer; 3. Resident 13's insulin pen had been stored in the refrigerator after being opened, contrary to the pharmacy medication label; 4. Resident 46's probiotic was located in the medication cart, not in the refrigerator as recommended by the manufacturer; 5. Resident 381's eye drops were not labeled These failures had the potential for use of discontinued medications, possible medication ineffectiveness, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN- a form that provides information to the beneficiary so that he/she can decide whether or not to get the care that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility) notice was issued for one of three sampled residents (Resident 46) when Resident 46's payment status for services received while in the facility had changed. This failure placed Resident 46 and /or responsible party at risk of not understanding the potential liability for payment of services not covered under Medicare (a federal health insurance). Findings: Review of Resident 46's census list indicated, Medicare was the payer of services received while in the facility. On 5/20/21, Resident 46's census list indicated a payer change. It also indicated Resident 46 remained in the facility after a change in payment status. During a concurrent record review and interview with the business officer manager (BOM) and the social service director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-18 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete discharge documentation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 33) when the discharge instructions had multiple blank sections. Without complete discharge instructions Resident 33 could misunderstand needs after being discharged from the facility to home. Findings: A review of Resident 33's admission Record indicated, Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in the spring of 2021 with diagnoses which included difficulty in walking and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 33's clinical record, titled Discharge Instructions, dated 5/27/21, indicated Resident 33's discharge summary only included vital signs, weight, diet, vision and bowel and bladder function. Missing sections included admit date , discharge date , discharge to, speech status, hearing status, physical status, dental condition, cognition status, activity of daily living (ADL) function and skin condition. The form did not indicate that home health would visit him after discharge. During an interview on 6/18/21, at 11:13 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-18 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 23 sampled residents (Resident 20, Resident 42) received proper treatment to maintain good foot health when: 1. Resident 20's toenails were long, discolored, and curved, and 2. Resident 42 had overlong toenails and had not received podiatry services in over a year. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 20 and Resident 42's mobility and cause complications such as injury, pain, and infection. Findings: 1. Resident 20 was re-admitted to the facility in late 2018. A review of Resident 20's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 3/24/21, indicated a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3 which indicated severely impaired cognition. During an observation in Resident 20's room on 6/16/21, at 5:06 p.m., Resident 20 was observed with discolored, long curved toenails on the second, third, and fourth digit of her left foot, almost touching the skin on the bottom side of her toes. The nails on the remainder of her digits, on the left and right foot, were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide comprehensive pain management, including assessment, for one out of 23 sampled residents (Resident 380) when, Resident 380 had not been evaluated for the presence of pain using a pain assessment scale (a tool used to assess the level of pain) for a total of 12 days . This failure resulted in Resident 380's pain not being effectively managed, with the possibility of pain not being treated when indicated. Findings: A review of Resident 380's admission Record indicated, Resident 380 was admitted to the facility in mid 2021 with diagnoses which included aftercare following heart surgery. A review of Resident 380's Brief Interview for Mental Status (3.0 BIMS) dated 6/5/21, indicated, Resident 380 scored 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident 380 was cognitively intact (the ability to remember, learn new things, concentrate, and make decisions that affect everyday life). During an interview, on 6/15/21, at 9:10 a.m., Resident 380 stated, she had pain located at the incision site on her chest. Resident 380…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for two of four residents observed during medication pass when: 1. The facility's pharmacist did not recognize a discrepancy between the dosage form (such as a chewable form) of a medication and the order for a medication for Resident 45 and Resident 16 and; 2. The facility's pharmacist did not ensure controlled drugs (medications that may be abused or cause addiction) were destroyed in a manner where they were unrecognizable and irretrievable. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on hall four (an area where residents reside) on [DATE], at 8:52 a.m., licensed nurse (LN) 5 administered an 81 mg (a unit of measure) chewable aspirin to Resident 45 in a plastic medication cup, along with other medications, and Resident 45 swallowed all of them whole. During a record review of Resident 45's physicians order for the 81 mg chewable aspirin, dated [DATE], the record revealed, .Aspirin 81…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate was less than five percent (%), when three medication errors occurred out of 27 opportunities during medication administration for 3 out of 4 residents (Resident 45, Resident 16, and Resident 60). As a result of these failures, the facility's medication administration error rate was 11%. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on Hall four (an area where residents reside) on 6/17/21, at 8:52 a.m., licensed nurse (LN) 5 administered an 81 mg (a unit of measure) chewable aspirin to Resident 45 in a plastic medication cup, along with other medications, and Resident 45 swallowed all of them whole. During a record review of Resident 45's physicians order for the 81 mg chewable aspirin, dated 5/5/21, the record revealed, .Aspirin 81 Tablet Chewable 81 MG .by mouth .one time a day .everyday . 2. During a medication pass observation on Hall four on 6/17/21, at 9:10 a.m., licensed nurse (LN) 5 administered two 648 mg chewable Calcium Carbonate (antacid) tablets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and the facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store and label food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for residents who received deli meat or drink thickener from the kitchen, when: 1. Two packages of meat stored in the walk-in freezer were not labeled by the specific meat name, and, 2. Three cans of expired food and drink thickener were available for use in dry storage. These failures had the potential to expose residents to a food allergen and/or expired food products. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observations with [NAME] 1 on 6/15/21 at 8:25 a.m., two packages of meat in a clear plastic bag were stored in the walk-in freezer. The bag was labeled as deli meat, dated 6/10/21, use by date 9/10/21. During a subsequent interview with [NAME] 1, [NAME] 1 identified the meat was bologna and turkey, then stated bologna and pastrami. [NAME] 1 was unable to identify the specific type of meat. [NAME] 1 acknowledged that the label did not specify the type of meat. She stated the label should specify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices were in place and adhered to by staff to prevent possible spread of COVID-19 in the facility, when: 1. Two (Resident 331 and Resident 332) of 12 yellow zone residents (designated area for newly admitted residents' quarantine to prevent or contain COVID-19) were not cohorted (people with the same infectious disease or potential exposure to the same infectious disease are roomed together) adequately when Resident 332 was readmitted into the same room with Resident 331 on the last day of Resident 331's quarantine, and, 2. The Laundry Supervisor did not put on proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (special equipment that protects from infection) before entering a yellow zone room. These failures put staff and residents at risk of contracting COVID-19, with the potential of causing serious illness or even death. Findings: 1. During an observation and interview on 6/15/21, at 12:16 p.m., Resident 331…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-03-18 · tag F0844 — widespread
    Follow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice at the time of the position change of the Director of Nursing (DON) to the State Agency (SA) for a census of 85 residents, when the current DON started the DON position on 12/10/25, and the facility did not report the change of the DON position to the SA until 1/7/26.This failure delayed the SA from verifying that the DON was qualified to lead clinical services at the skilled nursing facility, which had the potential to compromise resident safety and compliance with federal and state regulation for a census of 85 residents.Findings:During an interview on 3/18/26 at 11:43 AM with the DON, the DON confirmed she started her position as the DON with the facility on 12/10/25. The DON stated she was asked by the corporate (typically oversee billing, payroll, human resources, clinical compliance, and strategic management to ensure facilities meet state and federal standards) for all her licensing information but did not know when the change of leadership notification was sent to the SA.During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$47,637 in federal fines across 12 penalties.

  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $3,882 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $3,529 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Bixby Towers Post-Acute RehabLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Woodland Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 3 of 5Berkley Post-AcuteVan Nuys, CA 3 of 5Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare CenterGardena, CA 3 of 5Lake Park Healthcare CenterOakland, CA 3 of 5Marina Pointe Healthcare & SubacuteCulver City, CA 3 of 5Mission Palms Healthcare CenterWestminster, CA 3 of 5Sierra Vista HealthcareFresno, CA 3 of 5The Gardens Healthcare CenterNorthridge, CA 3 of 5Tracy Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterTracy, CA 4 of 5Alta Healthcare Center of CamarilloCamarillo, CA 4 of 5Country Crest Post-AcuteOroville, CA 4 of 5Lodi Nursing & RehabilitationLodi, CA 4 of 5North Park Post-AcuteTracy, CA 4 of 5San Juan Hills Healthcare CenterSan Juan Capistrano, CA 4 of 5South Marin Health & Wellness CenterGreenbrae, CA 4 of 5The Rehabilitation Center At The PalazzoPhoenix, AZ 4 of 5Villa Valencia Healthcare CenterLaguna Hills, CA 5 of 5Cottonwood Healthcare CenterWoodland, CA 5 of 5Greenridge Post AcuteEl Sobrante, CA 5 of 5Hillcrest Heights Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5La Casa Via Transitional Care CenterWalnut Creek, CA 5 of 5Oakland Heights Nursing And RehabilitationOakland, CA 5 of 5Pacific Heights Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Petaluma Post-Acute RehabilitationPetaluma, CA 5 of 5Stonebrook Health And RehabilitationLos Gatos, CA 5 of 5The Avenues Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5The Springs Healthcare Center At The CarlottaPalm Desert, CA 5 of 5University Post-Acute RehabSacramento, CA 5 of 5Woodlands Healthcare CenterLos Gatos, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ASCC, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/27/2014
SAMUELOTT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 06/25/2013
BRADSHAW, PETERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/07/2023
ELSNER, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/27/2014
KIRKWOOD, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
ORGILL, CRAIGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
PARTI, RAJESHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/27/2014
PARTI, SHRUTYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/27/2014
PAXMAN, MARCUSIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
RAWE, COLTONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
DEPERALTA, JENNYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/29/2022
GORING, REGINALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2017
SIDHU, SHIVJITINDERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
BRADSHAW, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2014
SEQUOIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
THE BRYAN C. JENNINGS AND SHARON JENNINGS REVOCABLE LIVING TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1986
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2014
BRADY, VERNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CASE, RYANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
JURADO, FRANKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$924K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 16%Other / private 25%

This home reported $924K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$436per resident / day
operating cost
$13,253per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$470per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555496. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next