The Springs Healthcare Center At The Carlotta

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 397 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.90 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 52% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 43.0 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.76 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services consistent with the professional standards of practice, to prevent progression of pressure injuries (PI-damage to the skin and underlying tissue due to prolonged pressure) for two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when: 1. For Resident 2, a consistent weekly skin assessment was not completed to evaluate the changes in the resident's redness to the coccyx identified on admission. In addition, the facility failed to initiate treatment for Resident 2's redness to the coccyx upon admission. These failures resulted in Resident 2's coccyx (tailbone) redness to worsen into a Stage 3 pressure injury (full thickness tissue loss). 2. For Resident 1, a consistent weekly skin assessment was not completed to evaluate the changes in the resident 's Stage 2 PI (shallow opening with loss of middle layer of skin) of the coccyx and left buttocks, and reddened sacrum (is a triangle-shaped bone between your hip bones) identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were wearing the N95 Respirator (a tight fitting disposable mask that filters out at least 95% of airborne particles including virus') they were approved to wear during Fit Testing (testing that determines the exact make and model of the N95 mask to be worn) for two out of three staff.This failure had the potential for the spread of COVID-19 (A contagious virus spread through respirator droplets) to other residents and staff in the facility. Findings: On January 28, 2026, at 10:05 a.m., an observation of a sign at the facility entrance indicated, . (The facility) currently (has) Covid cases in the building .we ask that you wear a mask during your visit . On January 28, 2026, at 10:43 a.m., an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 who stated, due to positive COVID-19 cases in the facility, staff are required to wear an N95 mask throughout their shift. The RN stated the facility fit tests to ensure staff wear the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure STAT (immediately) urinalysis (UA) and urine culture and sensitivity (C&S-isolation of microbes and sensitivity to drugs for treatment) specimens were pick up by the laboratory (Lab) within the time frame of 4-6 hours, for one out of three residents (Resident 1).This failure could have resulted in a delay in laboratory values being reported to the residents physician and a delay in necessary treatment for Resident 1.Findings:A review of Resident 1's Patient Information, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis (infection of the bone).A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview of Mental Status (A cognitive assessment), indicated Resident 1 had a score of 15, cognitively intact.A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated November 9, 2025, at 6:18 p.m., by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 indicated, . (Resident 1) has had a change of condition (COC-a deviation from baseline clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), when the resident left the facility unnoticed by facility staff. Later, an unknown visitor notified a staff member that Resident 1 left the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving information regarding the risks of leaving AMA which put Resident 1 at risk of possible worsening of her health condition while being outside of the facility setting, and resulted in the staff not knowing Resident 1 had left the facility.Findings:On August 18, 2025, an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a quality-of-care issue.On August 18, 2025, at 10:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1's Representative (RR)1, who stated he and RR 2 had Power of Attorney (POA - legally designated person to act on behalf of another person should the person become incapacitated) for Resident 1, and on August 9th, 2025, Resident 1 left the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment, store, and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Multiple large plastic pans stacked in the storage rack were wet; and 2. Four containers of five pounds (lbs - a unit of measurement) low fat cottage cheese were stored in the refrigerator beyond the use-by-date. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (bacteria were unintentionally tranferred from one substance or object to another with harmfull effect) and foodborne illnesses (illnesses that result from ingesting contaminated food) for 40 of 40 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On June 3, 2025, at 10:25 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) during inspection of the stacked large plastic pans in the storage rack. During inspection, multiple large plastic pans were observed being wet. The DM stated the large plastic pans were not supposed to be wet. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly when one re-cycle dumpster lid was widely open, bags of trash were piled and was overflowing one trash container causing the lid not to close, and multiple debris and trash were on the ground. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents that can be a source of communicable diseases. Findings: On June 3, 2025, at 11:36 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM), during inspection of the outside garbage storage area. The following were observed: - One of two blue re-cycle bins had its lid open; - One of four black dumpsters container was overflowing with bags of trash causing the lid not to close; and - Debris and trash were observed on the ground including multiple wood pallets. The DM stated the bags of trash should always be inside the dumpster with the lid closed. She stated the ground should be kept clean from debris. On June 3, 2025, at 1:56 p.m., The Maintenance Director (MD) was interviewed. The MD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for four of 40 residents reviewed (Residents 17, 92, 11 and 195), when: 1a. For Resident 17, on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP - an infection control precaution using the Protective Personal Equipment (PPE) such as gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities) the Physical Therapist (PT- healthcare professional who helps individuals improve their movement and functions through various therapies) did not wear the proper PPE when transferring Resident 17 from the wheelchair to the bed; 1b. For Resident 92, on EBP, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not wear proper PPE when providing care and changing bed linens; 2. For Resident 11, on EBP, the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did wear proper PPE when providing Foley (a thin flexible tube inserted through the bladder to drain urine when normal urination is not possible) catheter care; and 3. For Resident 195, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Residents 11 and 143) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drug that affects brain activities associated with the mental processes and behavior) medications when: - For Residents 11 and 143, there was no documented evidence the non-pharmacological interventions (NPI, non-drug alternatives) were attempted, including any trial or evaluation of behavioral, environmental, or person-centered approaches, prior to the initiation of psychotropic medications. Furthermore, there was no documentation indicating non-pharmacological interventions were being implemented and monitored in conjunction with the ongoing, daily administration of psychotropic medications; and - For Resident 11, the facility did not have the prescriber-documented rationale for extended use of the as-needed (PRN) temazepam (a psychotropic medication used for inability to fall asleep) beyond 14 days. These failures had the potential to result in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate administration of medication in accordance with the physician's order, when a tablet of enteric coated (EC, protective coating designed to dissolve in the small intestine rather than the stomach) aspirin (used to lowers the risk of a heart attack, stroke, or blood clot) was administered to Resident 291 in place of the prescribed order for a chewable aspirin. This failure had the potential for Resident 291 to experience delayed absorption (the time it takes for a medication to be absorbed into the body) and delayed onset (the time it takes for a medication to start working) of aspirin's effect, as enteric coated aspirin is designed to dissolve slowly in the small intestine, whereas chewable aspirin is absorbed more quickly in the stomach. Findings: During a medication pass observation on June 3, 2025 at 10:28 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was observed preparing and administering eight (8) medications, including a tablet of enteric coated aspirin 81 mg (milligram - unit of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and disposed in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures, when a total of three expired medications were found stored in the Medication Refrigerator, the Medication Room, and Medication Cart 1. These failures had the potential to result in the administration of less effective, expired medications, medication errors and compromised treatment outcomes for residents. Findings: 1. On June 3, 2025, at 2:50 p.m., during an inspection of the Medication Refrigerator with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, two bags of expired vancomycin (injectable antibiotic for infection) 750 mg (milligram - unit of measurement) compounded in 250 mL (milliliter - unit of measurement) of NS (normal saline) were observed. The pharmacy label on each bag indicated, Use By: 05/23/2025 (May 23, 2025). In a concurrent interview, LVN 2 verified the directions on the medication labels, indicating the use-by date written as May 23, 2025. LVN 2 stated the medications should have been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that high blood sugar level readings above 401 mg/dl (unit of measurement) were reported to the physician in a timely manner as ordered, for one resident reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had potential for delays of treatment for Resident 1 ' s high blood sugar level. Findings: On April 23, 2025, Resident 1 ' s record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes (high blood sugars) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Physician's Order dated, March 15, 2025, indicated, to give, .Humalog Injection (Insulin Lispro - injectable medication to treat high blood sugar)100 UNIT/ML (unit of measurement) . before meals and at bedtime as per following blood sugar sliding scale: - 120-150 (blood sugar reading) mg/dl = 2 units (insulin dose) ; - 151-200 = 3 units; - 201-250 = 8 units; - 251-300 = 10 units; - 301-350 = 12 units; - 351-400= 16 units; and - 401 + = 12 units The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $380K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA