The Avenues Transitional Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 235 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 134.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall for one (Resident 1) of four sampled resident when Resident 1 fell from bed to the floor.This failure resulted in Resident1 fall with injury, hospitalization, and subsequent death. Record review of Resident1's Clinical admission Record, admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, affecting both arms and legs, usually due to a spinal cord injury), a personal history of physical injury and trauma, and dementia (a progressive decline in mental abilities). At the time of the incident, Resident 1 was in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. During an observation on [DATE] at 2:05PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], there were three beds (39A, 39B and 39C). Bed A was the first bed near the door, bed with side table beside it. Both guard rails were down. The restroom is at the far end of the room, in front of bed C. During a telephone interview conducted on [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements in accordance with professional standards for food service when: 1. A dirty frying pan was found stacked in between clean frying pans under the food preparation counter. 2. Large metal pans and trays for serving were stacked wet under the food preparation counter. 3. A large can of mushroom was found dented among the undented canned products in the dry storage room. The failure to store clean cooking utensils, wet serving trays and dented canned products has the potential to contaminate other clean cooking utensils and promote growth of food borne illnesses to 133 residents. Findings: 1. During observation and interview with the dietary manager (DM) on 3/18/25 at 10:40 AM in the kitchen, observed a stack of frying pans under the food preparation table. The DM stated these are cleaned frying pans. When checked one by one, the second pan from the top was found dirty with dried food debris on the surface (looks like scrambled egg remains) with scratches. The black surface of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and provide needed care and treatment for two of 25 sampled residents (Resident 32 and Resident 78) when: 1. The facility failed to follow physician's order to obtain monthly measurements of mid upper arm circumference (MUAC, a tool used to assess nutritional status and help identify people at risk for malnutrition or weight loss, allowing for early intervention) for Resident 32 and Resident 78 who were refusing monthly weights. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 32 and Resident 78 to experience unplanned and undesirable weight loss. 2. The facility failed to implement interventions to monitor Resident 78's injection sites for bruising (skin discoloration from damaged, leaking blood vessels underneath your skin). Additionally, a change in condition was not completed for Resident 78's bruising on the right lower abdomen. This failure had the potential for uneven insulin (a hormone that is injected into the body…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (medications with high potential for abuse and addiction), appropriate preparation and accurate administration of medications when: 1. The Controlled Drug Records (CDR, accountability records, an inventory sheet that keeps records of the usage of controlled medications) for five of seven sampled residents (Residents 105, 119, 81,30 and 36) did not reconcile with the Medication Administration Records (MAR). This failure resulted in inaccurate accountability and the potential for abuse and diversion of controlled medications. 2. Nursing staff did not administer correct prescribed medication to one of five residents (Resident 28). 3. Nursing staff did not observe Resident 432 take her medication after leaving one of eight prescribed scheduled medication on the bedside table. 4. Nursing staff did not clean the shared pill cutter in between medication preparations. These failures resulted to medications not given according to the prescriber's orders and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications (drug or medicine, used to diagnose, cure, treat, or prevent disease) and biologicals were properly stored when: 1.The temperature in one of two sampled medication storage rooms did not follow the manufacturer's labeling for proper medication storage. 2.One of two sampled medication storage room refrigerator contained an open and undated multi dose vial (a small bottle of medication that contains more than one dose). 3.Three expired lidocaine (medication that reduces pain) 5% patches were stored in one of three medication carts for Resident 105, readily available for use. These failures had the potential for medications to be ineffective, unsafe for unknown usage timelines and expired that can harm residents. 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/25 at 11:51 AM with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the thermometer in the medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER] indicated a temperature of 78…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection control program when: 1. The urinal used by Resident 45 was stowed inside the trash bin at bedside. 2. During collection of soiled linen on the second floor, the janitor did not perform hand hygiene (the practice of cleaning hands to remove germs, dirt, and other contaminants) before and after glove use. 3. Nursing staff did not perform hand hygiene prior to medication preparation and administration for two of five residents (Resident 432 and Resident 28) and did not disinfect the blood pressure cuff (a device used to measure the force of blood against the artery walls) before and after use for one of one resident (Resident 432). 4. Nursing staff did not wear gloves during medication administration for one of five residents (Resident 433). Failure to implement infection prevention practices may result in cross contamination of infection that may jeopardize the health and safety of the residents and staff. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/18/25 at 9:13 AM, in Resident 45's room,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 25 sampled residents (Resident 92 and Resident 7) were treated with dignity and respect when Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 1 and CNA 2) were standing over residents while assisting them to eat. This failure resulted in the potential for Resident 92 and Resident 7 to feel disrespected and the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial (mental, emotional, social, and spiritual effects) well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 92's admission record indicated, Resident 92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), kidney disease, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) without behavioral disturbance, and history of falling. Review of Resident 92's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], indicated, severe cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe self-administration of medications for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 78) when: a. Multiple prescription medications were left at Resident 78's overbed table. b. The interdisciplinary team (IDT- a group of professionals from different disciplines who work together to achieve a common goal) did not determine if the prescription medications left on the overbed table may be self-administered by Resident 78. These failures resulted in the potential for medication error and may place residents on self-administration of medication at risk for adverse health reactions which could negatively impact the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 78's admission record indicated, Resident 78 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 1 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), end stage kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis (person relies on dialysis machines and procedures to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents reviewed (Resident 28) was free from unnecessary medication when Resident 28 has no evidence of monitoring for bleeding for the use of heparin (anticoagulant-commonly known as a blood thinner, a medication that prevents blood clots from forming in the heart and blood vessels). This failure had the potential to result in undetected medication adverse effects, such as bleeding. Findings: Review of Resident 28's admission Record, indicated, Resident 28 was readmitted in the facility on 2/5/25, with diagnoses including fracture (a break or crack in a bone) of left femur (thigh bone) and hemorrhage (bleeding) of anus and rectum (sections of the digestive tract). Review of Resident 28's Physician's Order, dated 2/10/25, indicated, heparin injection 5000 unit/ml (milliliter, unit of measurement), Inject 1 ml subcutaneously (into fatty tissue, just under the skin ) two times per day for DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis, a blood clot that forms in a deep vein, usually in the leg, which can cause swelling,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents reviewed (Residents 32 and 121) were free from unnecessary antipsychotic (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior) medications when: 1. There was no evidence of non-pharmacological interventions and PRN (as needed) Seroquel (quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication) was ordered for more than 14 days for Resident 32; 2. There was no evidence of specific behavioral monitoring for Seroquel use for Resident 121. These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medications that could cause somnolence (sleepiness), dry mouth and dizziness. 1. Review of Resident 32's admission Record, indicated, Resident 32 was readmitted in the facility on 8/30/23 with diagnoses including vascular dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), psychotic disorder (mental illnesses characterized by a significant loss of contact with reality) with delusion (false belief) and mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences for two out of 133 residents (Residents 36 and Resident 68) were honored when: 1. Resident 36 was served hard carrots with order of SOFT VEGETABLES. Texture: Mechanical Soft. 2. Resident 68 was plated the regular menu of fried rice, mixed veggies, and pork slices, when his meal ticket indicated, Serve Chow Mein with chicken OR potstickers. This failure had the potential for residents not receiving their food preferences that will result to poor appetite, and missing the nutritive value of their food leading to weight loss and/or malnutrition. Findings: 1. During concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/25 between 11:45 AM to 1:00 PM in the kitchen tray line, observed Resident 36 was served the regular menu of fried rice, mixed veggies (peas, carrots, corn and beans), and sliced pork. Review of Resident 36 meal ticket indicates: Texture - Mechanical soft; Special Diets ~ Thin Liquids; Notes - SOFT VEGETABLES. Interview with the Cook, Registered Dietitian (RD) and the Dietary Manager…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,685 — penalty dated 2025-10-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA