Petaluma Post-Acute Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 355 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 133 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 54% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 78.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 1.04 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0685 — pattern
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident 36 and Resident 92) had access to devices needed for sensory impairment when,1. Resident 36 reported broken glasses, needed for distance, on admission, and the glasses remained unaddressed a month later. And,2. Resident 92 reported needing hearing aids to hear people clearly, on admission, and Social Services did not respond to his request.This failure affected both residents' ability to actively engage in their care, their overall functionality, and their sense of well-being. Findings:1. A review of Resident 36's clinical record indicated she was admitted in 11/2025, with a diagnosis of a fracture of her left patella and a large contusion over her left eye after a fall. A review of Resident 36's inventory of personal effects, dated 11/18/25, indicated she reported that glasses were broken. A review of Resident 36's MDS (MDS-A resident assessment tool), dated 11/22/25, indicated no cognitive impairment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication labeling and storage practices were followed when,1. A loose Lantus Solostar Insulin Pen (A disposable prefilled injection device for long-acting insulin administration for diabetic residents) was found in the medication refrigerator with no label, no resident name, no instructions, no open date. And,2. Medication tablets and pills intended for wasting, were collected and filled in an unlabeled urine specimen cup that was stored inside a medication cart.These failures had the potential to contribute to unsafe medication use and administration and medication diversion.Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/25 at 1:05 p.m., in the main medication room with the Nurse Manager (NM), a loose unlabeled Lantus Solostar Insulin Pen was found in the medication refrigerator. The NM stated he did not know why it was not labeled or which resident it was for. The NM further stated, if the medication was not labeled it could be used for the wrong resident. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed for two of two Residents (Resident 62 and Resident 64), when Licensed Nurse 1(LN 1) did not disinfect the blood pressure cuff between use on these residents.This failure had the potential to spread infection between residents.Findings:During an observation on 12/17/25 at 8:09 a.m., in Hall A, LN1 checked the blood pressure of Resident 64 and did not disinfect the blood pressure cuff afterwards.During an observation on 12/17/25 at 8:26 a.m., in Hall A, LN1 proceeded to check the blood pressure of Resident 62 and did not disinfect the blood pressure cuff prior to using.During an interview on 12/17/25 at 8:43 a.m., with LN 1, LN1 stated she should have cleaned the blood pressure cuff between residents to stop the spread of germs from resident to resident.During an interview on 12/17/25 at 1:36 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated all vitals equipment should be cleaned at the start of the shift and between residents always, all multi-use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman (A government official who advocates for residents directly with the facility to resolve concerns and complaints) was notified, when one Resident (Sampled Resident #83) was transferred to the hospital.This failure had the potential to deny protection to Resident #83 from being inappropriately transferred or discharged and to have access to an advocate who could inform them of their options and rights. Findings:During a concurrent interview with the Nurse Manager (NM) on 12/17/2025 at 11:47 AM, the NM stated, when a resident was going to be transferred the expectation for nurses was to call the physician, notify family, get paperwork ready and to complete a hand-off report to the accepting facility. The NM did not state the expectation was to also notify the facility Ombudsman.During an interview and concurrent record review with the Director of Nursing (DON) at 11:47 AM, she stated Resident #83 was sent to the hospital for shortness of breath on 10/20/2025. She stated Resident #83 was admitted to the hospital, and the physician and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process for one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when Resident 1 and his family member were not trained on how to administer Resident 1's enteral nutrition formula (liquid nutrition) using Resident 1's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) and Resident 1's feeding pump (used to deliver the enteral nutrition) had not been delivered to Resident 1's residence upon his discharge. These failures resulted in Resident 1 not having received any nutrition for over 30 hours after his discharge from the facility, his transfer to the Emergency Department (ED) to be evaluated because of the potentially negative effect to his health and well-being, and his readmission to the facility one day after discharge. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to complete an assessment to determine if a resident was able to self-administer their medication(s) for 1 (Resident #52) of 18 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised 12/2022, indicated, 1. As part of their overall evaluation, the staff will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident. 2. In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff will perform a more specific skill assessment, including (but not limited to) the residents a. Ability to read and understand medication labels; b. Comprehension of the purpose and proper dosage and administration time for his or her medications; c. Ability to remove medications from a container and to ingest and swallow (or otherwise administer) the medication; and d. Ability to recognize risks and major adverse consequences of his or her medications. An admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore a gown and gloves when they provided incontinence care to 2 (Resident #34 and Resident #66) of 18 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, effective 08/06/2024, revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) - used in conjunction with the standard precautions and expand the use of PPE [personal protective equipment] to donning of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities and in situations of expected exposure to blood, body fluids, skin breakdown, or mucous membranes that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs [multidrug-resistant organisms] to staff hands and clothing to reduce transmission. The policy specified, 4. Facility staff shall perform hand hygiene and in cases when standard precautions may not be sufficient, will don gown and gloves before performing high-contact resident care activities. The list below is not all-inclusive, and activities requiring EBP are on a case by case basis as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-03-11 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents could receive visitors outside of regular working hours for one (Resident 64) of 17 sampled residents. This failure did not ensure Resident 64's rights, and had the potential to negatively affect residents' psychosocial outcomes due to restricted visitation of families and friends who may want to visit and cheer-up residents in the morning or evening, outside of business hours. Findings: A review of Resident 64's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a history of bleeding between the brain and tissue covering the brain, high blood pressure, insulin dependent diabetes and generalized muscle weakness. During an observation on 3/7/22 at 12:38 p.m., in Resident 64's room, she was observed sleeping in her bed not opening her eyes or responding to name by voice. Resident 64 could not be interviewed as she would not wake up, become alert and respond to requests for interview. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-03-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide individualized activities for three of 17 sampled residents (Resident 43, 58, and 64). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the quality of life of residents by placing them at risk of sensory deprivation and decreased cognitive functioning. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 43's, admission Record, dated 2/10/22, indicated she had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hip replacement surgery (surgery to implant an artificial hip joint), muscle weakness and low blood pressure when standing or sitting. A review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 1/31/22, indicated the resident exhibited no cognitive deficits. During a concurrent observation an interview on 3/7/22, at 3:28 p.m., Resident 43 stated that no one had come to her bedside to offer books or or provide other activities to complete at the bedside. Resident 43 was asked if she attended…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Infection Control Policy for 2 of 17 residents (Residents 14 and 33) when: 1. The Infection Preventionist (IP) did not perform hand hygiene between concluding a wound care and treatment for one resident (Resident 14) and touching doorknobs inside the resident's room. In 7/2021, Resident 14's wound became colonized with an infection caused Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, a strain of bacteria resistant to certain antibiotics and spread by contact with infected people, surfaces, or things that carry the bacteria); 2. Resident 33 exhibited potential symptoms of C. Diff. (a healthcare-associated infection causing loose stools) but the facility delayed implementation of its infection surveillance policy. These failures delayed monitoring and treatment for Resident 33's infection, and had the potential to spread MRSA and C. Diff infections among residents in the facility. Findings: 1) During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $956K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA