No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

South Marin Health & Wellness Center

1220 South Eliseo Drive, Greenbrae, CA 94904 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 72 certified beds · (415) 461-9700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (415) 461-9700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Mar 2024
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5 Bon Air Rd #117 D · (415) 448-1500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2 Bon Air Rd · (415) 924-2454 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
201 Hawthorne Ave · (415) 924-5961 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(415) 927-6746 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.1%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.312.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.611.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 336 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.63U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.7%CMS range 60.3–69.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.7%CMS range 6.7–11.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 4.3–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.92
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.75
RN hoursweekends
37.8%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 62.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.65 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to send a notice of discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an independent, impartial official that mediates complaints in the long-term care setting) at the same time the notice was given to one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 1 was not unsafely discharged .Findings:A review of Resident 1's Notice of Transfer or Discharge dated 10/21/25, indicated Resident 1's spouse received a notice of Resident 1's discharge from the facility on the same day Resident 1 was expected to leave on 10/21/25. Further review of this document indicated, The facility must send a copy of this notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman.A review of a facility fax transmission report indicated a copy of Resident 1's notice of discharge was sent to the Office of the State Long-term Care Ombudsman on 11/11/25 at 10:01 a.m., which was 22 days after Resident 1 was discharged from the facility. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses administered significant medication (a medication that increased the risk of harm when not taken) to one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents on 10/15/25 because they did not reorder the medication prior to it running out.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 1 received medication as ordered and decreased Resident 1's risk of developing a blood clot.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 9/27/25 with diagnoses which included wedge compression fracture (occurs when the front part of one of the bones in the spine collapses and forms a wedge shape and causes back pain), chronic pulmonary embolism (a blockage in a lung artery), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clot formation and an increase in the risk of stroke and heart disease), and muscle weakness.A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, dated October 2025 indicated, Rivaroxaban [a medication that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the dignity of three sampled residents (Resident 27, Resident 76 and Resident 52), when the residents reported missing clothing and personal items to the facility and the facility did not respond according to their Facility Policy and Procedure for Theft and Loss.This failure to follow their Policy and Procedure for theft and loss resulted in a loss of dignity and respect for the residents when they did not have access to clothing from home that felt familiar as well as personal item that were important to their day-to-day life in the facility. During an observation at the nurses' station, on 12/3/25 at 12:42 p.m., a binder titled THEFT /LOSS / GRIEVANCE, not dated, indicated there were no completed documents or forms for any residents.During an observation and interview with Resident 76 on 12/3/25 at 9:08 a.m., he stated he was missing a grey sweater and a red polo shirt. He stated when he was admitted to the facility staff did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 11, 63 and 68) when: 1. Residents 11 and 63 did not received their insulin before meals as ordered. 2. Resident 68 received pain medication that was ordered to relieve mild pain only when Resident 68 was complaining of severe pain.This failure could result in:1. Inappropriate Diabetes management, which could result in blood sugar spike (hyperglycemia) followed by a potential delayed low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) several hours later. 2. increased pain and suffering. Findings:1.A review of Resident 11s face sheet (resident demographics) indicated an admission date of 11/2025 with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM, disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and Stage 3 chronic kidney disease (kidneys have mild to moderate damage and are less able to filter waste and fluid out of your blood).A review of Resident 11s EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) for 12/2025 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility:A. did not implement Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP, an infection control intervention, primarily used in nursing homes, that involve the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities to reduce the transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs, microorganisms, primarily bacteria, that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) ) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 53) when Resident 53s surgical thoracic wound was treated using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT/wound vac, a treatment that uses a sealed dressing, connected to a vacuum pump to apply continuous or intermittent suction to a wound).B. did not follow the manufacturers recommendation on the appropriate contact time when sanitizing the glucometer (small, portable medical device used to measure the amount of sugar (glucose) in a drop of blood) before using it to check three out of three sampled residents blood sugar.C. failed to ensure staff observed hand hygiene (hand washing) prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic use protocol in addition to a system to effectively monitor the use of antibiotics.This failure can result in inappropriate use of antibiotics that can lead to the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, difficulty treating infections and severe health complications. Findings:During an interview on 12/04/2025 at 1:00 PM, the facility Infection Preventionist (IP) stated the facility use the McGeer criteria ( an evidence-based guideline for defining infections in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), focusing on specific group of symptoms and laboratory results for respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary infections) to guide treatment. On further interview the IP stated aside from the McGeer criteria they have no other protocol they use for antibiotic stewardship (a coordinated effort in healthcare to ensure antibiotics are used appropriately-only when needed, with the right drug, dose, and duration-to improve patient outcomes, combat the serious threat of antimicrobial resistance, and preserve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's code status (defines what life-sustaining treatments (like CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation), intubation, shocks) a medical team should provide if a patient's heart stops or they stop breathing, guiding emergency care to match the patient's wishes) was accurately clarified, consistently documented, and incorporated into the resident's goals of care for one of six residents sampled for Advance Directives (Resident #5). This failure resulted in conflicting information regarding Resident #5's code status and had the potential to result in the resuscitation of a resident who wished to have a natural death.Review of Resident #5's physician's order dated [DATE] indicated the resident was designated Full Code (patient wants all possible life-sustaining treatments used if their heart stops or they stop breathing).Review of Resident #5's advance health care directive signed on [DATE] indicated both Full Code and DNR (a medical order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to provide a copy of the notice of discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one (Resident 74) of three sampled discharged residents.This failure had the potential for inappropriate and unsafe discharge and deprived Resident 74 of access to an advocate who can provide information of her options and rights.Findings: A review of Resident 74's electronic medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of stroke, Parkinson's disease, dementia, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and malnutrition. Resident 74 was discharged on 9/22/25. A review of Resident 74's discharge records did not indicate a copy of the notice of discharge was provided to the Ombudsman's office. During a concurrent interview and review of records with the Social Services Director (SSD) on 12/4/25 at 3:52 PM, the SSD confirmed Resident 74 was discharged on 9/22/25. The SSD verified the Notice of discharge was opened on 9/22/25 but was not completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer on one (Resident 24) of 19 sampled residents when Resident 24 developed pressure ulceration under the oxygen tubing over his left ear. This failure led to staff not having an individualized plan to follow to regularly monitor and ensure the oxygen tubing with ear protector is kept in place to prevent skin ulceration. Findings:During an initial observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 8:58 AM, Resident 24 was in bed, on oxygen therapy at a rate of 2 liters per minute supplied via nasal cannula (oxygen fed through transparent tiny tubing that splits into left and right tubes commonly applied at the back of the head and run over the ears and over the cheekbone to the nose). Resident 24's skin behind the ears under the oxygen tubing was very red. The cannula ear protector was over the left cheekbone instead of over the back of the ear. During an interview inside the room of Resident 24, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E did not have a response when asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to monitor and ensure proper placement of oxygen tubing and ear protector to prevent the development of pressure ulcer on one (Resident 24) of 19 sampled residents.This failure led to Resident 24 developing a pressure ulcer behind his left ear from oxygen cannula tubing pressure.Findings:During an initial observation on 12/2/25 at 8:58 AM, Resident 24 was in bed, on oxygen therapy at a rate of 2 liters per minute supplied via nasal cannula (oxygen fed through transparent tubing that splits into left and right tubes passed at the back of the head and run over the ears, and over the cheekbone to the nose). The skin behind the resident's ears under the oxygen tubing was very red especially the left ear with the tubing pressed against the skin creating an indentation. The cannula ear protector was over the left cheekbone. During a follow-up visit on 12/3/25 at 9:55 AM, the skin under the oxygen tubing behind Resident 24's left ear was very red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly administer tube feeding to one of one resident sampled for tube feeding (Resident #8) when Resident #8 was found laying flat during tube feeding administration. This failure had the potential to result in aspiration (inhaling foreign substances like food, liquids, saliva, or stomach contents into the lungs, which can lead to pneumonia, a lung infection) of the tube feeding formula, difficulty breathing, aspiration pneumonia, and hospitalization. Review of Resident #8's face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 5/28/24 and multiple medical diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction (stroke caused by a blockage in the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and gastrostomy (a surgically inserted tube that brings nutritional formula through the abdomen directly into the stomach).Review of Resident #8's physician orders indicated an order, dated 10/30/25, for tube feeding 20 hours per day from 2 p.m. to 10 a.m.Review of Resident #8's care plan, dated 7/23/24, indicated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure two out of four sampled residents' (Residents 5 and 68) pain was adequately and timely addressed. These failures left Resident 5 distressed, tearful, feeling like she was dying and experiencing 12/10 (Twelve out of Ten), severe pain for 30 minutes before receiving her narcotic (strong but addictive pain medicine) pain medication and Resident 68 feeling frustrated and enduring pain while having to wait for over an hour to receive his routine narcotic medication.Findings:A review of Resident 5's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date of 6/2025, with a diagnosis of pathological fracture of left femur (broken bone in the thigh caused by disease) and malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of the bone.A review of Resident 5s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident), dated 8/28/25, resulted in a score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure:only medications that were prescribed by the physician were administered for two out of four sampled residents (Residents 2 and 45). 2. two out of four sampled residents (Residents 2 and 45) were allowed to keep medications at bedside without safe administration assessment and physician order.These failures had the potential to put residents at high risk for masking of serious medical condition and adverse drug reactions.Findings:A review of Resident 2s face sheet (resident demographics) indicated an admission date of 7/2025 with a diagnosis of Hypertension (high blood pressure) and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol)A review of Resident 45s face sheet indicated an admission date of 11/2025 with a diagnosis of muscle weakness and cellulitis (a skin infection that causes swelling and redness) of right and left lower limb.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/01/2025 at 10:44 AM, Resident 45 was noted with refresh eye drops at bedside. Resident 45 stated she had the eye drops there since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three medication carts (Medication cart for Station 2 and medication cart for Station 3), in addition to the medication room, were free of expired and outdated medications and medical supplies for residents. This failure had the potential to result in inadvertently using these products on residents, which could have caused them harm and infections. Findings: During a medication storage observation and interview on 11/18/24 at 10:55 a.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) F, the medication Latanoprost 0.005% (A medication to treat increased pressure in the eye) was observed stored inside the medication cart for Station 2 with other active medications. This medication had an expiration date of 11/15/24 and belonged to Resident 47. LN F confirmed the finding and stated the Infection Preventionist (IP) and Director of Staff Development (DSD) were responsible for checking the medication carts every week to check for expired medications. LN F confirmed this expired medication should not be stored in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the recipe for pureed rice. This failure could lead to potential food safety issues, inconsistent quality of meals for residents, and nutritional deficiencies. Findings: A review of [NAME] Puree Recipe Book, recipe name Pureed Potatoes, Pasta, [NAME] and Other grains, the recipe indicated an ingredients of potatoes, pasta, rice cooked and drained, broth hot or hot 2 percent milk, margarine and thickener. A review of [NAME] Puree Recipe Book, recipe name Pureed Salad-Potato, Pasta and Other Grains the recipe indicated an ingredients of salads, potato and pasta type and thickener. During an observation on 11/20/24 at 11:40 a.m., [NAME] 1 did not follow the pureed recipe for rice when she did not add margarine and thickener when she prepared the pureed rice. During an interview on 11/20/24 at 10:12 a.m., the Registered Dietician (RD) stated it was expected cooks were following the recipes to ensure consistent quality food was served…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were served with food that was palatable, attractive and at an appetizing temperature. These failures could put the residents at risk for illness, injury, malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition, caused by not having enough to eat, not eating enough of the right things), and poor nutritional status. Findings: A review of Resident 18's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Essential Hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) and Muscle weakness. Resident 18's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, used to get a quick snapshot of how well you are functioning cognitively -mental process involved in comprehension and gaining knowledge) dated 11/12/24 score was 15 indicating intact cognition. A review of Resident 22's face sheet indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Essential Hypertension and Atelectasis (partial or complete collapse of the lung). Resident 22's BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1A. two food items in the freezer were clearly labeled to identify what it was, when it was opened and when to discard the food item. 1B. one pitcher of tea was discarded by the use by date of 11/16/24. 2. one dented can (might contain bacteria that can make you sick, or even produce a toxin that can be deadly) was not separated from intact cans. These failures could put the residents at risk for: 1A. allergic reactions, health complications and food poisoning (infection or irritation of your digestive tract that spreads through foods). 1B.consuming tea that might contain bacteria which can cause abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea (three or more loose stools per day), and fever. 2. consuming food that was contaminated with molds, bacteria or the toxin produced by the bacteria Clostridium botulinum (causes Botulism, a rare but serious condition caused by a toxin that attacks the body's nerves and may cause life-threatening symptoms such as paralysis-loss of the ability to move and difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy on foods brought by family/ visitors when the food stored in resident's refrigerator by the nursing station did not have a use by date per their policy. This failure could lead to residents potentially consuming food that has gone past its safe consumption window, increasing the risk of foodborne illness due to bacteria growth, as well as potential issues with food quality and taste deterioration, which could impact resident nutrition and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 225's face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 11/6/24 with a diagnoses of Essential Hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) and Hyperlipidemia (HLP, abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood). During an observation on 11/19/24 at 3:48 p.m., Resident 225 had 6 food containers in the resident's refrigerator by the nursing station as follows, 2 containers of chilis, 1 container of meatloaf, 1 container of cage free egg salad, and 2 container of potato salads. All these containers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Process soiled linens to prevent the spread on infection. 2 A. Offer hand hygiene (HH) to eight of nine residents (Resident 59, Resident 225, Resident 61, Resident 121, Resident 40, Resident 5, Resident 49, and Resident 120) before meals. 2 B. Perform HH prior to donning new gloves by one dietary staff , [NAME] E. 3. Use enhanced barrier precautions (A set of infection control measures that reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes) when two nursing assistants working with Resident 33 who had a history of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-A type of bacteria resistant to a certain type of antibiotics), did not follow the precautions. 4. Air dry kitchen utensils prior to storing in the kitchen drawers. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission of infections to the residents of the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/21/24, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure hot water was available for use to the shared bathrooms in rooms (rms) 26-28 and 27-29 when the hot water temperature in these rooms were below 105 degrees. This failure resulted in Resident 48 who was in RM [ROOM NUMBER] complaining of inconvenience and unpleasantness of using cold water to wash her hands for over a week. This failure also put the residents at risk for not washing their hand due to discomfort, residents could then get sick and spread infection (invasion and growth of germs in the body) to others. Findings: A review of Resident 48's face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 2/28/2023. Resident 48's diagnoses included Essential Hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure), Muscle Weakness and Anxiety disorder (AD, a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation). Resident 48's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pets control program when flies were observed in the facility, bothering two residents, Resident 38 and Resident 21. This failure posed a health risk to residents as flies carries and spread diseases like food poisoning, salmonella (food poisoning caused by infection (invasion or growth of germs in the body) with the salmonella bacterium), Escherichia coli (E. coli, a sickness you get from the E.coli bacteria that causes a lot of diarrhea (3 or more loose stool per day) related illnesses) and staphylococcus (group of bacteria that causes skin infection). Flies could also contaminate food and could infest (present in large numbers) open wounds. Findings: A review of Resident 38's face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 8/9/24. Resident 38's diagnoses included Hyperlipidemia (HLP, high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood) and Sepsis (body's extreme reaction to an infection, without prompt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four Licensed Nurses (Licensed Nurse (LN) H and Licensed Nurse (LN) O ) followed professional standards of practice when: 1. LN H left medications by Resident 67's bedside without a physician order. 2. LN O did not follow facility policy when performing a blood glucose (Blood sugar) check for Resident 170. These failures had the potential to result in medication administration errors and inaccurate blood glucose tests which could have caused harm to the residents involved. Findings: Resident 67 Record review of Resident 67's Face Sheet (Facility demographic) indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Encephalopathy (A general term for a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction) and Diabetes Mellitus (A chronic disease characterized by high levels of blood sugar). During an observation and interview on 11/20/24 at 6:02 p.m., LN H was observed administering insulin (Injectable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seventeen sampled residents (Resident 21) had intervention and supervision implemented to prevent falls. As a result, Resident 21 sustained four falls with minor injuries (Skin tears and bruises) in a period of ten months. This failure had the potential to result in further falls with injuries for Resident 21. Findings: Record review of Resident 21's Face Sheet (Facility demographic) indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (A lung disease characterized by chronic obstruction of lung airflow that interferes with normal breathing and is not fully reversible) and Muscle Weakness (Loss of muscle strength). Record review of Resident 21s Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS-A cognition assessment) dated 10/11/24 indicated he received a score of 12, which indicated his cognition was moderately impaired (A score of 1-7 indicates the cognition is severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one of two sampled residents, Resident 1, received care in accordance with his comprehensive person-centered care plan based on his comprehensive assessment and per his doctor's orders regarding Resident 1's medical diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), when on 5/24/24, Certified Nursing Assistant A (CNA A) offered Resident 1 ice chips (considered as Transitional Food- Food that starts at one texture (e.g. firm solid) and changes into another texture specifically when moisture (e.g. water or saliva) is applied or, when a change in temperature occurs (e.g. heating). This failure had the potential to result in aspiration pneumonia (Aspiration pneumonia occurs when food or liquid is breathed into the airways or lungs, instead of being swallowed) to Resident 1. Findings. A review of Resident 1's hospital Discharge Summary Notes, dated 5/24/24, at 3:29 p.m., indicated Resident 1 was admitted to this hospital from [DATE] to 5/24/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of a staff to resident (Resident 1) verbal altercation, and an incident between residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) within two hours of the incidents. This failures had the likelihood for incidents of potential abuse to not get prevented, corrected, or investigated in a timely manner, and can result to physical, mental, or psychosocial harm to residents. Findings: On 3/11/24, the Department received reports from the facility of an alleged incident of potential abuse between Resident 1 and Resident 2 and an incident between Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA F) and Resident 3. During a concurrent review of records and interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/18/24 at 10:42 AM at the Administrator ' s office, the incident between Resident 1 and CNA F happened on 3/10/24 at 3:00 PM. The Department received the SOC 341 (Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse) from the facility by fax on 3/11/24 at 0:34 AM. The incident between Resident 1 and Resident 2 happened on 3/9/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to respond to call lights timely when five of 16 sampled residents had to wait up to one hour for staff to respond when residents pressed their call lights for assistance. This failure resulted in residents sitting in soiled briefs. Findings: During an interview on 5/9/22 at 12:33 p.m., Resident 52 stated she had had sores on her bottom for one year and they (the sores) would heal if all the staff caring for her provided her wound care right. Resident 52 stated the longest she had to wait for staff to respond to call lights was 45 minutes, and she stated she has had to wait while she was wet which interfered with the wound healing. Resident 52 stated PM shift (3 p.m. to 11 p.m.) was the worst with responding to call lights. During an interview on 5/9/22 at 3:09 p.m. and 4:11 p.m., Resident 63 stated she would have to wait for someone to answer her call light, especially on the PM shift. Resident 63 stated the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) were great, but overworked, and frequently had to work a double shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow up on a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federal requirement to help ensure individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) level 2 referral (determines if mental illness needs of a the individual can be met in a nursing facility) for 1 out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 27) and five unsampled residents (Resident 64, Resident 7, Resident 16, Resident 65 and Resident 66). This failure had the potential risk of Resident 27 missing out on specialized services and obtaining additional resources. Findings: Resident 27 face sheet (demographics) indicates a diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar type (a mental health condition with combined symptoms of both schizophrenia and mood disorder with dramatic highs, manic and depressive episodes.) During an observation in the dining room on 5/09/22 at 12:33 p.m. Resident 27 was verbal and interacting with visitor. Resident 27 was observed with inability to sit still (rocking motion) and involuntary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide two of three sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 18) scheduled weekly showers, who depended on staff to assist. This failure to provide the necessary care resulted in residents looking unkempt and had the potential for residents having body odors, dry/broken skin not being assessed, and/or an infection, further negatively impacting the resident's physical and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 18's admission Record, indicated Resident 18 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including degenerative disease of the nervous system (Your body's command center. Originating from your brain, it controls your movements, thoughts and automatic responses to the world around), dementia (mental processes caused by brain disease and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), fracture of the left femur (broken thighbone), aftercare following joint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with or at risk for developing pressure ulcers (PUs - injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin caused by staying in one position too long) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 267) were provided treatment consistent with professional standards to promote healing of a pressure ulcer when Resident 18 and Resident 267 were not being turned and repositioned per the facility's policy/procedure, nursing staff did not document turning and repositioning, inconsistent skin documentation and Resident 18's heels were not being floated (offloading by using pillow(s) under resident's calves) per physician order. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 18 and Resident 267 to acquire new pressure ulcers and/or worsen current pressure ulcers. Findings: Resident 18 A review of Resident 18's admission Record, indicated Resident 18 was admitted on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's consultant licensed pharmacist failed to detect and report 62 medication errors involving the administration of insulin (a hormone which regulates the amount of glucose in the blood) at bedtime to one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 53). Over a four-month period, from January to April 2022, Resident 53 was administered the wrong dose of bedtime insulin 62 out of 118 nights. The wrong doses were documented in Resident 53's medication administration record. The facility's consultant licensed pharmacist reviewed Resident 53's medication administration record monthly during January and April 2022 but did not detect or report these drug errors. This failure prevented the facility from being alerted that Resident 53 was receiving the wrong bedtime doses of insulin which placed Resident 53 at risk of a potentially dangerous drop in blood sugar/hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). Findings: During an interview and record review on 5/12/22, at 10:50 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility contracted with a consultant licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 53) was free of significant medication errors when Resident 53 received the wrong dose of insulin (a hormone produced in the pancreas which regulates the amount of glucose in the blood) at bedtime 70 times over a period of 130 days from January 2 to May 11, 2022. These failures resulted in Resident 53 receiving up to four times the ordered bedtime dose of insulin during that period, placing Resident 53 at risk of a potentially dangerous drop in blood sugar/hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). Findings: A review of Resident 53's Facesheet indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus type 2 (Type 2 diabetes is an impairment in the way the body regulates and uses sugar (glucose) as a fuel). A review of Resident 53's Physician Orders indicated order dated 1/2/22 for insulin four times a day (with meals: at breakfast, lunch and dinner; and at bedtime) as follows:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient dietary personnel when the facility's food and nutrition services was short of one dietary aide and one cook. This failure resulted in the facility's Director of Food Services (DFS) performing the duties of dietary support personnel, such as processing food deliveries, assembling resident lunch trays, and transporting resident food carts, which resulted in perishable foods being left unrefrigerated outdoors and prevented the DFS from managing and overseeing the facility's food and nutrition service. Findings: During an observation on 5/11/22, at 8:20 a.m., there were four dietary support personnel working in the kitchen: [NAME] A, [NAME] B, Dietary Aide C, and Dietary Aide D. During the same observation, the Director of Food Services (DFS) was unloading, labeling, and storing a large quantity of boxes containing food and kitchen supplies placed on pallets outdoors next to the entrance of the kitchen. During an interview on 5/11/22, at 8:45 a.m., the DFS stated he was processing the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of the facility's Grievance Process for seven out of 16 residents. This failure had the potential risk of unresolved grievances or concerns. Findings: During the resident council meeting on 05/10/22 at 10:58 a.m., Anonymous 1 stated the facility has no formal grievance process and would like it if there is one. Anonymous 2 stated she thought grievances are to be reported to the nurses. Anonymous 3 stated to just report to the Ombudsman. Anonymous 3 stated that when he has grievance or concerns, he talks to the administrator. Anonymous 1 stated not a lot of residents knew the Administrator. During an interview on 5/12/22 at 9:02 a.m., Resident 33 stated he does not know the facility's grievance process. During an interview on 5/12/22 at 9:07 a.m., Licensed Staff G stated she's not sure about the facility's grievance process. During an interview on 5/12/22 at 9:09 a.m., Unlicensed Staff H stated they report grievance to the nurses. During an interview on 5/13/22 at 8:30 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan with interventions to meet the needs of one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 267) when Resident 267 was assessed to be immobile and at high risk for pressure ulcers and the facility did not include in her care plan the intervention of turning and repositioning Resident 267 every two hours. This failure had the potential for Resident 267 to develop pressure ulcers. Findings: A review of Resident 267's Facesheet indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, history of falling and failure to thrive. A review of Resident 267's admission Braden Scale (a standardized tool that indicates the risk of a resident developing pressure ulcers), dated 4/5/22, indicated Resident 267 was bedfast: confined to bed and was completely immobile: does not make even slight changes in body or extremity position without assistance. The Braden Scale…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to follow medication safety measures when licensed staff administered twice the ordered dose of a medication to a resident, Resident 57. This failure could potentially lead to further medication errors and cause harm to vulnerable residents. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 5/12/22 at 8:28 a.m., Licensed Staff G removed two tablets of Buspirone (anti-anxiety drug) 30 mg (milligrams, a unit of measure) from a bubble pack and administered them to Resident 57. Review of Resident 57's physician orders revealed, Buspirone HCl (hydrochloride, an additive for shelf life) Tablet 15 MG Give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day for anxiety. During an interview on 5/12/22 at 3:11 p.m., Licensed Staff G verified the bubble pack's instructions to give one tablet of Buspirone 30 mg did not match the physician's order to give two tablets of buspirone 15 mg. During an interview on 5/17/22 at 11:16 a.m., Director of Nursing (DON) stated that every Friday she went through all the medication bubble packs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to change the nasal cannula (NC) weekly for one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 48 ). Staff did not change Resident 48's NC tubing (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a patient in need of respiratory help) per the facility's policy policy. This failure had the potential risk of Resident 48 acquiring an infection and or not receiving the correct amount of prescribed oxygen. Findings: During an observation on 5/09/22 at 11:56 a.m., Resident 48 was on oxygen at 2 liters per minute (lpm) via NC with a label that indicated a date of 4/18/22 (the date the NC was changed out). During an observation on 5/10/22 9:12 a.m., Resident 48's NC label was still dated 4/18/22 During an observation and interview on 5/11/22 at 11:50 a.m., Licensed Staff L verified Resident 48's nasal cannula, which was now on the floor, was dated 4/18/22. During an observation on 5/11/22 at 12:42 p.m., Resident 48 was in bed, with oxygen on at 2 lpm via NC with no date label. During an observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in sanitary manner when perishable food intended for residents was left unrefrigerated outdoors for over 1.5 hours and one of four dietary support personnel did not have their hair fully restrained/covered while preparing resident food. These failures created the potential for foodborne illness in a vulnerable resident population and for food to become contaminated and improper for resident consumption. Findings: During an observation on 5/11/22, at 8:20 a.m., there were four dietary support personnel working in the kitchen: [NAME] A, [NAME] B, Dietary Aide C, and Dietary Aide D. During the same observation, the Director of Food Services (DFS) was unloading, labeling, and storing a large quantity of boxes containing food and kitchen supplies placed on pallets outdoors next to the entrance of the kitchen. During an interview on 5/11/22, at 8:45 a.m., the DFS stated he was processing the facility's weekly food delivery that had been left by the vendor outside. The DFS stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Bixby Towers Post-Acute RehabLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Woodland Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 3 of 5Berkley Post-AcuteVan Nuys, CA 3 of 5Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare CenterGardena, CA 3 of 5Lake Park Healthcare CenterOakland, CA 3 of 5Marina Pointe Healthcare & SubacuteCulver City, CA 3 of 5Mission Palms Healthcare CenterWestminster, CA 3 of 5Riverwood Health CareStockton, CA 3 of 5Sierra Vista HealthcareFresno, CA 3 of 5The Gardens Healthcare CenterNorthridge, CA 3 of 5Tracy Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterTracy, CA 4 of 5Alta Healthcare Center of CamarilloCamarillo, CA 4 of 5Country Crest Post-AcuteOroville, CA 4 of 5Lodi Nursing & RehabilitationLodi, CA 4 of 5North Park Post-AcuteTracy, CA 4 of 5San Juan Hills Healthcare CenterSan Juan Capistrano, CA 4 of 5The Rehabilitation Center At The PalazzoPhoenix, AZ 4 of 5Villa Valencia Healthcare CenterLaguna Hills, CA 5 of 5Cottonwood Healthcare CenterWoodland, CA 5 of 5Greenridge Post AcuteEl Sobrante, CA 5 of 5Hillcrest Heights Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5La Casa Via Transitional Care CenterWalnut Creek, CA 5 of 5Oakland Heights Nursing And RehabilitationOakland, CA 5 of 5Pacific Heights Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Petaluma Post-Acute RehabilitationPetaluma, CA 5 of 5Stonebrook Health And RehabilitationLos Gatos, CA 5 of 5The Avenues Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5The Springs Healthcare Center At The CarlottaPalm Desert, CA 5 of 5University Post-Acute RehabSacramento, CA 5 of 5Woodlands Healthcare CenterLos Gatos, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AGSE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2018
ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/20/2018
SEQUOIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
SKBM LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/22/2025
BRADSHAW, PETERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/07/2023
ELSNER, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/20/2018
KIRKWOOD, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
ORGILL, CRAIGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
PARTI, RAJESHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/20/2018
PARTI, SHRUTYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/20/2018
PAXMAN, MARCUSIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
RAWE, COLTONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CASTRO, MADELENEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2020
NECKE, KYLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/23/2017
BRADSHAW, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
EAST WEST BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2018
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2018
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2018
BRADY, VERNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CASE, RYANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
JURADO, FRANKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
NGUYEN, SUSANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$977K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 36%Other / private 13%

This home reported $977K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$608per resident / day
operating cost
$18,482per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$687per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055093. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next