No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Country Crest Post-Acute

50 Concordia Lane, Oroville, CA 95966 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (530) 532-6600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (530) 532-6600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2767 Olive Hwy · (530) 532-8654 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2721 Olive Hwy · (530) 534-9811 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5291 Lower Wyandotte Rd · (530) 533-5226 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2821 Wyandotte Ave · (530) 533-2011 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.0%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.4%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.4%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.5%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.2%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.1%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.612.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.121.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 302 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
77.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.28hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 77.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 150 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.1%CMS range 50.6–65.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.9%CMS range 10.1–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge77.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge78.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting13.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.8–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.70
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
53.7%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 52.7 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.95 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.94 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain food safety requirements regarding the preservation of a sanitary kitchen environment in addition to appropriate storage and labeling of foods when the main kitchen was observed to have a build up of grime and webbing on pipes under counters, mineral and corrosive (something that causes gradual harm due to a chemical reaction) buildup on pipes and draining apparatuses, dirt buildup on flooring and air gap drains, grease and grime on the hood over the stove, breadcrumb buildup in the toaster, dirt buildup on the filters and plastic of a portable cooler unit, a large unlabeled brisket thawing in the refrigeration unit, expired Yoplait yogurt in the refrigeration unit, a container of red gelatin dessert unlabeled in the refrigeration unit, and an inadequately covered cardboard box of sliced mushrooms in the refrigeration unit.This failure had the potential to result in disease transmission, increasing health complications and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean homelike environment when two of three shower rooms were found to be less than adequately maintained when the laminate on counter tops was chipped, paint was chipped and not adhered to the walls above and around the shower stalls, flooring was in disrepair in front of the shower stalls, by the door, as well as within the shower stalls.This failure had the potential to result in disease transmission, with increasing health complications and overall wellbeing issues to those residents utilizing the common space.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, dated Revised May 2017, the policy indicated, The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: Clean, sanitary and orderly environment.During an observation on 1/12/26 at 4:00 pm, the resident shower rooms were observed for adherence to safety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that it remained free from (potential) accidents and hazards when two of three shower rooms were observed to have a hole in the floor of one shower room, and an open box on the wall appearing to be a temperature control apparatus with exposed wires and sharp edges in the second shower room.This failure had the potential to result in physical injury leading to psychological trauma and health decline for residents utilizing the common space.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Hazardous Areas, Devices and Equipment, dated Revised July 2017, the policy indicated, All hazardous areas, devices and equipment in the facility will be identified and addressed appropriately to ensure resident safety and mitigate accident hazards.A hazard is defined as anything in the environment that has the potential to cause injury.During an observation on 1/12/26 at 4:00 pm, the resident shower rooms were observed for adherence to safety requirements. Shower room one was observed with an open,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0826 — pattern
    Provide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide physical therapy (PT) services as indicated on the evaluation for five out of five sampled residents (Resident 1, 9, 13, 34, and 41) when:Residents 1, 34, and 41 were not provided with PT five times a week.Residents 9 and 13 were not provided with PT three times a week.This had the potential to result in a decline in physical function and physical ability and prevented Resident 1, 9, 13, 34, and 41 from reaching their full potential and causing health complications and emotional dysfunction. A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis that included, muscle weakness, unsteady on feet, dementia (loss of memory), and anxiety (fear of unknown).During an interview on 1/12/26 at 11:00 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated he did not think he was getting PT, as much as he is supposed to, last two weeks of December.A review of Resident 34's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an individualized patient-centered care plan for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 9 and 41) when:Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 3) transferred Resident 9 to bed without assistance and Resident 9 fell to the floor.CNA 3 ambulated Resident 41 without assistance and Resident 41 fell to the floor causing a skin tear.These failures resulted in Resident 9 and Resident 41 to fall had had the potential to cause broken bones. 1.A review of Resident 9's clinical record indicated, Resident 9 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis that included, muscle weakness, unsteady on feet, and dementia (loss of memory).During an interview on 01/12/26 at 12:30 p.m., with Resident 9, Resident 9 said that last month CNA 3 was helping him get into his wheelchair by herself and he lost his balance and slipped to the floor. Resident 9 told CNA 3 that she needed another person to help but she ignored him. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were followed when nursing staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while handling hazardous medication (medications that can cause serious effects including cancer, organ toxicity, fertility problems, genetic damage, and birth defects if not handled appropriately).This failure had the potential to result in unwanted exposure to hazardous medications leading to health complications. Findings:During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 1/24, the P&P indicated, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication.A review of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 's current recommendations for addressing the health and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) when random controlled medication audits for one out of four residents (Resident 16) did not reconcile. Two controlled medications were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but were not accurately documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were administered to the resident.This failure resulted in the facility being unable to ensure accurate accountability of controlled medications and had the potential for diversion or misuse, unavailability of emergency medications when needed, and failure to meet the resident's therapeutic needs, placing the resident at risk for worsening of their medical conditions.Findings:A review of Resident 16's medical record indicated Resident 16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 29) were free of significant medication errors when both residents received latanoprost eye drops (a medication to treat glaucoma and ocular hypertension) multiple times (doses) past the expiration date.This failure had the potential for ineffective use of the latanoprost eye drops, placing the residents at risk for worsening of their medical conditions.Findings: During a concurrent record review and inspection of Medication Cart 1 on 1/12/26 at 1:25 pm alongside Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), two bottles of latanoprost eye drops opened 11/14/25 for Resident 9 and 29, were identified. LN3 reviewed the manufacturer's labeling on the bottle which indicated, Opened bottle may be stored at room temperature for 6 weeks. LN 3 confirmed both eye drops had expired on 12/26/25. She stated nursing staff had continued to administer the eye drops to Resident 9 and 29 beyond their expiration date, and confirmed that medication can be less effective when used beyond…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened multi-dose medications and biologicals were dated with an open and discard date to ensure they were not used beyond the discard date, and expired medications were not available for resident use.This failure had the potential for residents to receive medications or biologicals with unsafe and reduced potency from being used past their discard date, and incorrect medications from inadequate labeling.Findings:During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 1/24, the P&P indicated, medication expiration dates must be checked, expired medication will not be administered to a resident, the nurse is to place a date opened label on applicable medications and document the date, and the manufacturer recommendations for beyond use dating are to be followed.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Medication Storage - Storage of Medication, dated 1/24, the P&P indicated, Insulin vials and pens are to be labeled with the date when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care and service for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when:1. A change in condition was not recorded and reported to the Medical Director (MD) when Resident 1 experienced a decrease in the frequency of her daily brief (type of adult disposable underwear) changes, which was a significant indicator of decreased urine output. 2. A laboratory blood test (labs - the process of analyzing a blood sample to measure specific substances) order placed by the MD on [DATE], was not fulfilled, resulting in Resident 1's lab not being drawn as instructed.These failures led to Resident 1 not receiving appropriate medical assessments and treatment, ultimately resulting in her death on [DATE].Findings:During a review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised 11/2015, the policy indicated that: The facility will promptly notify the resident, their attending physician, and their representative of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) received wound preventative measures as ordered to prevent skin breakdown, promote circulation, and provide pressure relief. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a stage 2 pressure ulcer (partial-thickness skin loss, where the epidermis (outer layer) and part of the dermis (second layer) are damaged caused by prolonged pressure) to their coccyx (tailbone), which had the potential to lead to complications including pain, discomfort, and infection. Findings: During a record review of the facility policy titled Skin Integrity Management Protocol dated 1/2019, it was indicated that staff were to relieve the underlying cause, addressing pressure, shear, other physical friction, and maceration/moisture factors. The facility policy indicated to keep local areas clean, dry, and free of body wastes such as urine, feces, perspiration, and wound drainage. The policy indicated to inspect skin frequently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Medical Director (MD) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when there was a need to alter Resident 1's healthcare decision maker as Resident 1 was still listed as the decision maker. Resident 1 had a St. Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) examination (a cognitive screening test designed to detect the early signs of mild cognitive impairment and dementia) done on 7/22/24, and had a score of 3 out of 30, indicating that Resident 1 was cognitively impaired. This failure resulted in the facility continuing indicating that Resident 1 Has the capacity to make and understand decisions , and only notified Resident 1 when there was an alleged abuse allegation. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status , revised 5/2027, indicated: 1. Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an abuse allegation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 informed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A that a male staff was Really rough when getting her [Resident 1] in & out of bed, grabbed her really hard, and wanted to hurt her on 10/24/24. This failure had the potential to result in psychosocial and emotional harm for Resident 1 and had the potential to place all the residents at risk for undetected/unreported elder neglect or abuse. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program , revised 12/1/22, indicated this policy is to, Promote and environment free from any form of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation and /or mistreatment. The policy also indicated that: 1. The facility shall thoroughly investigate allegation of abuse by identifying and interviewing all involved, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witness (es) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure social services met the needs for two of three residents (Resident 1, 2) when: 1. The Social Service Director did not investigate and reported to the authorities after Resident 1 informed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B of an allegation of abuse on 10/24/24. This failure had the potential to result in psychosocial and emotional harm for Resident 1 and had the potential to place all the residents at risk for undetected/unreported elder neglect or abuse. 2. The Social Service Director failed to ensure the Behavior Management Committee address the appropriateness of the use of the psychotropic medication when Resident 2 was prescribed with PRN Lorazepam (brand name: Ativan - used to relive anxiety) for extended time period without the rationale. This failure could contribute to unsafe use of psychotropic medications that could have placed residents at risk for adverse consequences. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe use of psychotropic medications (medication that alters mood, behavior, and cognition) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 was prescribed with Lorazepam (brand name: Ativan - used to relive anxiety) for extended time period without the rationale. This failure could contribute to unsafe use of psychotropic medications that could have placed residents at risk for adverse consequences. Findings: During a review of the State Operations Manual (SOM -contains guidance on certification and survey activities, a federal document from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services), revised 8/8/24, indicated, 1. A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. 2. As needed (PRN) for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. 3. Order may be extended beyond 14 days if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes it is appropriate to extend the order.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary preparation and service of meals. Specifically, the facility failed to practice proper hand hygiene and glove use during food preparation, and the facility failed to hold foods at safe temperatures during meal service. This had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings included: 1. During an observation on 09/24/2024 at 11:23 AM, the temperature of pizza's being served to residents was at 136 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The temperature of the pizza's was measured again at 12:17 PM, and was at 122 degrees F. It was also observed that there were three stacked pizza pans underneath the pizza, separating it from the heat source. There were four pizza slices that remained, and they were served to two unidentified residents. During an interview on 09/25/2024 at 1:47 PM, the Food Services Director (FSD) stated that the facility staff should have discarded the four slices of pizza that were served and instead served the pizza that remained in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and review of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2022 Food Code, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 dumpster was closed to prevent the potential for vermin and pest attraction. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents that resided in the facility. Findings included: The U.S. FDA 2022 Food Code, dated 01/18/2023, revealed Chapter 5. Water, Plumbing, and Waste, section 5-5 Refuse, Recyclables, and Returnables, included, 5-501.15 Outside Receptacles. (A) Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE, recyclables, and returnables used with materials containing FOOD residue and used outside the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT shall be designed and constructed to have tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers. (B) Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE and recyclables such as an on-site compactor shall be installed so that accumulation of debris and insect and rodent attraction and harborage are minimized and effective cleaning is facilitated around and, if the unit is not installed flush with the base…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered appropriately for 3 (Residents #204, #17, and #11) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #204 and Resident #17 received oxygen at their prescribed flow rates and failed to ensure the humidifier bottle on Resident #11's oxygen concentrator was functioning properly. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration (Mask, Cannula, Catheter), revised 12/2016, revealed, The purpose of the oxygen therapy is to provide sufficient oxygen to the blood stream and tissues. The policy also indicated, It is the policy of this facility that oxygen therapy is administered, as ordered by the physician or as an emergency measure until the order can be obtained. The facility policy procedures revealed, 9. Attach the oxygen delivery device to the oxygen unit. 10. Turn the unit on to the desired flow rate and assess equipment for proper functioning. A. Airflow should be felt through the oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program was followed and maintained for 1 (Resident #38) of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters and 3 (Residents #37, #17, and #204) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #38's urinary catheter bag was observed on the ground or floor, and respiratory equipment was inappropriately stored to prevent infections for Residents #37, #17, and #204. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Urinary Catheter Care, revised 03/2021, under the section, Infection Control, revealed b. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #38 on 01/19/2023 and readmitted the resident on 07/11/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of obstructive and reflux uropathy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure oxygen use was accurately coded on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 (Resident #17 and Resident #11) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings included: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.19.1, dated 10/2024, Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs revealed, Coding Instructions for Column b. While a Resident Check all treatments, procedures, and programs that the resident received or performed after admission/entry or reentry to the facility and within the last 14 days. The user's manual further revealed, O0110C1, Oxygen therapy Code continuous or intermittent oxygen administered via mask, cannula, etc. [et cetera, and other similar things] delivered to a resident to relieve hypoxia in this item. The user's manual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the California Department of Health Care Services Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Assessment Guide, the facility failed to ensure a Level I PASRR accurately reflected the presence of a serious diagnosed mental disorder and the use of prescribed psychotropic medication for 1 (Resident #30) of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. Findings included: The California Department of Health Care Services Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Assessment Guide, dated 01/12/2023, revealed, Section III-Serious Mental Illness Questions 10-12 This section helps determine if the individual may have a serious mental illness and benefit from specialized services. Question 10. Diagnosed Mental Illness *Does the individual have a serious diagnosed mental disorder such as Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder, Schizophrenia/Schizoaffective Disorder, or symptoms of Psychosis, Delusions, and/or Mood Disturbance? *If yes, there will be a text box question [to] provide the type of mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #34) of 4 sampled residents who had cardiac pacemakers. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a care plan for the care and treatment of Resident #34's cardiac pacemaker. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 12/2016, indicated, 8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: a. Include measurable objectives and timeframes; b. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; and k. Reflect treatment goals, timetables and objectives in measurable outcomes. An admission Record revealed the facility most recently admitted Resident #34 on 07/06/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of presence of cardiac pacemaker, atrial fibrillation, and presence of prosthetic heart valve. Resident #34's Pacemaker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed for 1 (Resident #40) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Monitoring-Medication Regimen Review and Reporting, dated 01/2024, revealed, 8. The nursing care center follows up on the recommendations to verify that appropriate action has been taken. Recommendations should be acted upon within 30 calendar days or per facility specific protocols. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #40 on 04/06/2023 and readmitted the resident on 12/29/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/10/2024, revealed Resident #40 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (pro re nata, as needed) psychotropic medication use was limited to 14 days for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, revised 02/2024, specified, Procedure The facility should comply with the State Operations Manual, and all other Applicable Law relating to the use of psychoactive medications, including gradual dose reductions. The policy further indicated, 3. Psychotropic medications to treat behaviors will be used appropriately to address specific underlying medical or psychiatric causes of behavioral symptoms. Residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a PRN order unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. a. For psychotropic PRN medications, excluding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent (%). The facility had 2 errors out of 36 total opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 5.55 %, affecting 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #34) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration (General), dated 08/18/2022, indicated, 9. The licensed nursing or medical personnel administering the medication shall check the label at least THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. 10. The following information must be checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications: a. Allergies to medications b. Vital signs, if necessary. An admission Record indicated the facility most recently admitted Resident #6 on 07/10/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a complete medical record for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed who had a cardiac pacemaker. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4's medical record contained information regarding the model and/or serial number and the implant date for the resident's cardiac pacemaker. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Pacemaker, Care of a Resident with a, revised 12/2015, indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to provide information about and guidance for the care of a resident with a pacemaker. The policy revealed for monitoring the resident's pacemaker, 5. Make sure the resident has a medical identification card that indicates he or she has a pacemaker. The medical record must contain this information as well. The policy also indicated, 1. For each resident with a pacemaker, document the following in the medical record and on a pacemaker identification card upon admission: a. The name, address and telephone number of the cardiologist; b. Type of pacemaker; c. Type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report injury of unknown origin for one resident (Resident 1) out of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse within 2 hours, to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). This failure had the potential to delay investigation and interventions to prevent abuse to other residents in the facility. Findings: The facility ' s policy revised1/10/24, titled Abuse Reporting and Investigation, indicated to promptly report all allegations of abuse as required by law and regulations to appropriate agencies within the required time frames. All allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or injury of unknown cause/origin shall be reported to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator (APC) immediately. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property shall be reported by APC/Designee to local CDPH, Long Term Care Ombudsman and Local Law…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and observation, this regulation was not met when two vinegar bottles, one molasses bottle, and a 20 gallon jug of unlabled cooking oil, and five bags of bread and rolls were observed not to have expiration, open dates, or use-by dates. This resulted in the potential for foodborne illness and lack of palatability of the affected food, for all residents. Findings: Review of the the facility's record titled Policy and Procedure, Food Service Management, Nutricopia, Inc, dated 2018, indicated as follows: Store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety; and, All open food items will have an open date and use-by date per manufacturer's guidelines. Additionally, the policy indicated that the shelf life of opened vinegar and syrups is 12 months. The policy indicated that refrigerated biscuits, rolls, pastries . were recommended to be used by expiration date on label. In an observation and concurrent interview in the kitchen with Prep [NAME] B (PCB) on 10/24/23 at 1:00 PM, two open one-gallon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-01-18 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on dietetic services observations, dietary staff interview and departmental document review, the Registered Dietitian (RD) and/or the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) failed to ensure: 1) Vegetarian menus were in place and followed. 2) Timely and effective communication and monitoring system was in place between the facility kitchen and the contract kitchen regarding resident diet orders and food allergies. These failures had the potential to result in nutritionally inadequate meals, and the potential to promote decline in medical and nutritional status as well as quality of life for residents who received food from the facility food services. Findings: 1) During concurrent observations, interviews and record reviews between 01/10/22 at 9:15 AM and 1/13/22 at 4 PM showed: a vegetarian menu was not used or followed. Menus were not followed for mechanical soft diets; Portions were not served according to the menu; and menus for therapeutic diets were not followed (Cross Reference F803). 1A) A menu was not followed for Vegetarian Diets. During an observation of the lunch meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-01-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, meal delivery observations and departmental document review the facility failed to ensure meals were presented at a temperature that met the individual preferences of two Residents (Residents 36 and 246). Failure to ensure meals are prepared and delivered in a manner that meets residents needs may result in decreased food intake, resulting in weight loss further compromising medical status. Findings: During an interview on 1/10/2022 at 9:30 AM, Resident 246 stated Breakfast is always cold. During an interview on 01/10/22 at 12:05 PM, Resident 36 stated Food is sometimes cold, they need some plate warmers or something . Eggs and toast are not hot. I think I'm the last of the line. The toast is ice cold. On 01/12/22 beginning at 8:05 AM, a test tray was conducted on Unit B. The cart contained 11 resident trays in addition to the test trays. It was noted Unit B was designated as a COVID-19 yellow zone. The COVID-19 yellow zone is intended for residents who are awaiting COVID-19 test results or may have been exposed to someone who has tested positive.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food were stored, prepared, distributed and maintained in safe and sanitary condition in their contracted kitchen when: 1. a. The facility kitchen staff were not following the departmental dress code. b. Internal bin of the ice machine had an area with pink, clear slimy appearing material. c. The kitchen areas and equipment were not clean. 2. a. Refrigerated food were not labeled, dated, monitored and raw foods were not separated from ready-to-eat foods. b. Potentially hazardous foods (PHF) were not at safe temperatures below 41°F. These failures had the potential for the spread of infection and foodborne illness to occur to residents. Findings: 1. a. On 1/10/2022 at 9:15 AM, during the initial tour of the facility contract kitchen and concurrent interviews with Dietary Aide (DA) L and DA M, the following were observed: * DA L and DA M wore no apron. * DA M did not wear a hair net or hat. DA M's forehead was sweating and he wiped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) A review of Resident 7's record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and muscle weakness. MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 7 had severe cognitive impairment (unable to think and reason), total dependence for activities of daily living (ADLs), and required two person assistance for bed mobility (how a resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed), transfers (how a resident moves between surfaces including to or from: bed, chair, wheelchair, standing position), and toilet use. Resident 7's range of motion was impaired on both sides of her upper and lower extremities, and used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident 7's Nurses Progress Note, dated 10/22/2021 at 6:21 AM by Licensed Nurse (LN) F, indicated Resident 7 had a witnessed fall. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D informed LN F that on her last round at 5:20 AM, Resident 7 had fallen out of bed onto the floor while being changed by CNA D.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure contracted kitchen staff were able to verbalize or demonstrate their competence to carry out the responsibilities of the food and nutrition services when: 1) Staff did not properly complete the food cooling process to ensure food safety. 2) Staff signed off on cleaning schedules, indicating 100% of daily cleaning assignments were completed when equipment was not clean. 3) Staff did not follow standardized recipes. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness, decreased nutritional status, and medical decline for residents consuming food prepared in the contract kitchen. Findings: During observations and concurrent interviews with the contract kitchens' Food and Nutrition Services Director (FNSD) and staff between 1/10/2022 at 9:45 AM and 1/12/2022 at 4 PM staff knowledge and professional standards of practice were not consistently in place. Temperatures were not monitored or documented for food stored in the sandwich station. Expired food was not discarded. Food was not properly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were in place and followed when: 1. A vegetarian menu was not used or followed, and the nutritional adequacy of vegetarian meals served to two residents (Residents 14, 42) since admission was unknown. 2. Menus were not followed for 10 of 10 residents (Residents 3, 17, 18, 28, 30, 34, 245, 251, 254, 397) on mechanical soft diets. 3. Portions were not served according to the menu for six of 43 residents (Residents 4, 10, 12, 19, 38 and 397). 4. Menus for therapeutic diets were not followed for three residents (Residents 22, 24 and 28). These failures created the potential for residents to receive food that did not comply with the physician ordered diet, did not meet resident nutritional needs, and had the potential to compromise residents' medical status, nutritional status, and quality of life. Findings: 1. During an interview with Dietary Aide (DA) L on 1/10/22 at 11:30 AM, she stated they currently had 2 Vegetarian residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on dietetic services observations, dietary staff interview and departmental document review the facility failed to ensure pureed foods for seven residents (Residents 7, 8, 32, 40, 252, 244 and 396) were prepared in accordance with standards of practice and departmental policies. Failure to ensure meal preparations were in accordance departmental procedures may result in decreased meal intake compromising the nutritional status of residents. Findings: The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative describes a pureed diet as one where all food should be pureed to a homogenous, cohesive, smooth texture. Foods should be pudding-like and hold its shape on a spoon. Contains no lumps. Not sticky. Pureed foods can be piped or molded and will not spread out if spilled. The prongs of a fork make a clear pattern when drawn across the surface of the puree. During meal plating observation on 1/11/22 beginning at 11:20 AM, it was noted the pureed broccoli resembled a thickened creamed soup. It was noted when it was plated it did not hold shape, rather spread out on the plate.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the Administrator (ADMIN) failed to provide and administer oversight and use its resources effectively when: 1. Infection control program for soiled resident laundry was not implemented, staff training, to ensure their policy and procedures followed Center of Disease Control (CDC) infection control standards. This failure resulted in resident clothing not being clean and sanitary and had the potential to spread disease and infection throughout the facility. Refer to F 880 and F 867 2. Dietary services did not follow national standards and guidelines for kitchen cleanliness, food temperatures,storage and nutritional needs. Refer to F 803, F804, F 805 and F 812. This commulative failures resulted in a potential for spread of disease and infection and dietary needs of residents' not to be met. Findings: A review of the facility's Administrator Job Description, dated 2017, indicated the ADMIN was responsible to Assist the Quality Assurance and Assessment Committee in developing and implementing appropriate plans of action to correct identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify and implement plans of action to correct deficiencies when: 1. Laundry services for residents did not meet standards for sanitation and infection control. This failure resulted in resident clothing not being cleaned and sanitary and had potential for the spread of diseases and infection throughout the facility. Refer to F880. 2. Dietary services did not meet the nutritional and palatability needs of residents. These failures created the potential for residents to receive food that did not comply with the physician ordered diet, did not meet resident nutritional needs, and had the potential to compromise residents' medical status, nutritional status, and quality of life. Refer to F803, F804, and F805. 3. Dietary services did not follow national standards and guidelines for kitchen cleanliness, food temperatures, and storage. These failures had the potential for the spread of infection, and foodborne illness to occur in residents. Refer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Center of Disease Control (CDC) infection control standards for residents' soiled laundry were implemented. This failure resulted in residents' clothing not being cleaned and sanitary and had the potential to spread disease and infection throughout the facility. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Infection Control Manual - Laundry Department dated 5/7/2019, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to practice safe and sanitary laundry procedures, and the purpose of the policy is to decrease the risk of disease transmission . and ensure an effective infection control program. Administrative staff act jointly with the infection control committee to create policies and procedures to laundering resident's personal clothing. Monitor linen handling in resident care and laundry areas to ensure proper procedures are followed. Act jointly with infection control committee in making periodic facility inspection to ensure infection control standards consistently maintained. Soiled linen will be removed from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    4) During an observation on nursing unit C, on 01/10/2022 at 11:10 AM, it was noted the shower room sink had a small clump of gray hair that had not been cleaned out. In a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J, on 01/10/2022 at 11:16 AM, CNA J stated staff rinsed out used wash cloths in sink but they didn't wash resident's hair in the sink. CNA J confirmed there was a clump of gray hair in sink drain in the shower room on nursing unit C. 5) Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 02/2013, indicated that, The nurse or authorized staff member on duty ensures equipment and supplies relating to medication storage and use are clean and orderly. On 01/12/2022 at 08:16 AM, it was observed that the Medication Storage room on nursing unit C had a moderate amount of dirt and dust on the floor, and empty shipping boxes with corrugated cardboard stored under the medication supplies. In an interview with Housekeeping (HK) G, on 01/12/2022 at 11:09 AM, HK G stated housekeeping was not given the assignment of cleaning the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D was competent to provide safety measures during resident care, when Resident 7 rolled off the bed. This failure resulted in Resident 7 sustaining injuries that required a trip to emergency department services for evaluation and treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 7's record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and muscle weakness. The Minimum Data Set (resident assessment), dated 10/10/2021, indicated Resident 7 had severe cognitive impairment 9unable to think or reason), total dependence for activities of daily living (ADLs), and required two person assistance for bed mobility, transfers and toilet care. Resident 7's range of motion was impaired on both sides of her upper and lower extremities, and used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident 7's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a team of health care professionals who assess,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-09-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the daily staffing postings were updated every shift for 24 days from 09/01/2024 through 09/24/2024. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents that resided in the facility. Findings included: An observation on 09/25/2024 at 1:23 PM, revealed the staff postings were not being updated with the actual hours worked. Daily staff postings for the timeframe from 09/01/2024 through 09/24/2024, revealed staff documented the staff hours scheduled but not the actual staff hours worked for every shift. During an interview on 09/25/2024 at 2:45 PM, the Staffing Scheduler stated she was told she had to post the staffing for the previous day, the current day, and the next day, but she was not aware the postings had to be updated every shift with the actual hours worked. During an interview on 09/26/2024 at 10:29 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the Staffing Scheduler printed the staff postings and placed them on the wall. The DON stated the postings should be updated by him or the Staffing Scheduler. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Bixby Towers Post-Acute RehabLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Woodland Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 3 of 5Berkley Post-AcuteVan Nuys, CA 3 of 5Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare CenterGardena, CA 3 of 5Lake Park Healthcare CenterOakland, CA 3 of 5Marina Pointe Healthcare & SubacuteCulver City, CA 3 of 5Mission Palms Healthcare CenterWestminster, CA 3 of 5Riverwood Health CareStockton, CA 3 of 5Sierra Vista HealthcareFresno, CA 3 of 5The Gardens Healthcare CenterNorthridge, CA 3 of 5Tracy Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterTracy, CA 4 of 5Alta Healthcare Center of CamarilloCamarillo, CA 4 of 5Lodi Nursing & RehabilitationLodi, CA 4 of 5North Park Post-AcuteTracy, CA 4 of 5San Juan Hills Healthcare CenterSan Juan Capistrano, CA 4 of 5South Marin Health & Wellness CenterGreenbrae, CA 4 of 5The Rehabilitation Center At The PalazzoPhoenix, AZ 4 of 5Villa Valencia Healthcare CenterLaguna Hills, CA 5 of 5Cottonwood Healthcare CenterWoodland, CA 5 of 5Greenridge Post AcuteEl Sobrante, CA 5 of 5Hillcrest Heights Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5La Casa Via Transitional Care CenterWalnut Creek, CA 5 of 5Oakland Heights Nursing And RehabilitationOakland, CA 5 of 5Pacific Heights Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Petaluma Post-Acute RehabilitationPetaluma, CA 5 of 5Stonebrook Health And RehabilitationLos Gatos, CA 5 of 5The Avenues Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5The Springs Healthcare Center At The CarlottaPalm Desert, CA 5 of 5University Post-Acute RehabSacramento, CA 5 of 5Woodlands Healthcare CenterLos Gatos, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AOCL, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 12/07/2022
BRADSHAW, PETERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/07/2023
ELSNER, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/07/2022
KIRKWOOD, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/07/2022
ORGILL, CRAIGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/07/2022
PARTI, RAJESHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/07/2022
PARTI, SHRUTYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/07/2022
PAXMAN, MARCUSIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
RAWE, COLTONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
GARRETSON, CHARLESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
SIEDENTOPF, CHRISTIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
BRADSHAW, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
EAST WEST BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/07/2022
SEQUOIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/07/2022
BRADY, VERNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CASE, RYANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
JURADO, FRANKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$533K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 35%Other / private 5%

This home reported $533K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$487per resident / day
operating cost
$14,801per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$490per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555802. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next