No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Woodland Post-Acute

678 3rd Street, Woodland, CA 95695 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 91 certified beds · (530) 662-9643 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (530) 662-9643 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2024Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$14,302 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,302 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-22)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
475 Pioneer Ave · (530) 406-5600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
825 East St · (530) 419-8120 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
825 East St · (530) 661-1236 · Call to confirm hours
Park
617 East St · (530) 406-1759 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.1%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.5%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.8%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.6%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.042.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.611.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.0%CMS range 38.2–55.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.9–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.8–14.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
0.82
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.08
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-20)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an acceptable parameter of nutritional status such as usual body weights for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 50) when Resident 50's severe weight losses (more than 5% weight variance in one month, more than 7.5% weight variance in 3 months and more than 10% weight variance in 6 months) were not consistently identified, interventions were not evaluated for effectiveness, and the physician and responsible party (RP) were not notified of the change in Resident 50's condition.These failures had the potential to cause further nutritional decline and resulted in Resident 50 experiencing the following severe weight losses:- 6/5/25 to 7/1/25: 9 lbs (pounds, a unit of measurement) or 6.6% in a month;- 9/1/25 to 10/3/25: 7 lbs (5.1%) in a month;- 11/2/25 to 12/2/25: 6.8 lbs (5.3%) in a month;- 6/5/25 to 12/2/25: 15.6 lbs (11.5%) in six months; and- 10/3/25 to 1/1/26:13.6 lbs (10.5%) in three months.During a review of Resident 50's admission records, the records indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment according to professional standards of practice for three of 24 sampled residents (Resident 93, Resident 8 and Resident 9) when: 1.Resident 93's PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter, a type of IV, intravenous line, that is used to deliver fluids or medications into a vein) was not flushed (injection of normal saline solution into an IV catheter to clear the line) prior to and after IV antibiotics (used to treat bacterial infections) were administered; 2. The physician was not notified of Resident 8's blood sugar reading greater than 400 mg (milligrams)/dl (deciliter); and, 3. Resident 9's IV antibiotic was not administered as ordered and the physician was not notified of Resident 9's unavailability of IV access. These failures had the potential for Resident 93 to experience complications including PICC line failure or infection, Resident 8 to experience complications from hyperglycemic (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include procedures to ensure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of drugs for four of 24 sampled residents (Resident 8, Resident 93, Resident 17, and Resident 9) when: 1. Resident 93's medication was not available for administration as ordered;2. There was no accurate accountability of controlled medications (high potential for abuse or addiction) for three residents (Resident 93, Resident 8, and Resident 17); and3. Resident 9's medications were not administered as ordered. These failures increased the potential for Resident 93 and 9 to experience adverse effects from not receiving medications and the potential for abuse, misuse, and diversion for controlled medications.1. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 93 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (sudden, severe infection of the bone) of left ankle and foot and sepsis (a life-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately stored and not available at bedside for three of 24 sampled residents (Resident 5, Resident 50, and Resident 68) when:Eye drops were observed on top of Resident 68's bedside table;An orange tablet was observed in an unlabeled medication cup on top of Resident 5's bedside table; and,An unlabeled medication cup containing white powder was observed on top of the dresser in Resident 50's room.These failures had the potential for Resident 5, Resident 50, and Resident 68 to receive medications with unsafe or reduced potency from improper storage.During a review of Resident 68's admission records, the records indicated Resident 68 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses that included sciatica (pain that travels along the path of the sciatic nerve) and muscle weakness. Resident 68's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/9/25, indicated Resident 68…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were prepared to meet the needs of the residents when the Dietary Aide (DA) did not follow the recipe when preparing a pureed food.This failure had the potential to result in decreased nutritional value or decreased meal satisfaction for residents who receive a pureed diet. A review of the facility's pureed spaghetti recipe for winter menu 2026, indicated .Place portions of regular cooked spaghetti needed into a food processor. Process to a fine texture. For every 5 portions needed, add 1 cup of hot water and 1 tbsp [tablespoon] margarine and nonfat dry milk powder. Process until smooth, pudding consistency is achieved. With a rubber spatula, scrape down sides of the bowl; reprocess 30 seconds . During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/26 at 9:48 a.m. with the Dietary Aide (DA), who stated she is also a cook, and the Dietary Manager (DM), observed the DA prepare the pureed spaghetti for the lunch meal. Observed the DA add correct ingredients and process to smooth pudding consistency.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and store food in a safe and sanitary method in accordance with professional standards when:1.The Dietary Aide (DA) did not properly calibrate a thermometer, and2.The cutting boards had crevices, and3. A dietary staff did not wear a beard net in the kitchen, and4.Resident's food in resident refrigerator was not labeled with correct use by date.These failures placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/26 at 10:20 a.m. with the Dietary Aide (DA) and the Dietary Manager (DM), the DA stated she calibrates the thermometers twice a week. Reviewed log of thermometer calibrations that indicated the thermometers had been calibrated to 32 degrees Fahrenheit every morning. The DA stated she only checks the cold temperature not the boiling point. Observed the DA place five thermometers in a glass container with ice but did not add water to make a slush of ice and water. The DA pushed the thermometers into the ice. The DA waited three minutes before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure required members of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI - a data driven proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) Committee were present during meetings for a census of 82 when the Medical Director (MD) did not attend the QAPI meetings quarterly.This failure had the potential to negatively impact the quality of resident care.During a review of the facility's quarterly QAPI meeting sign-in sheets, dated 7/29/25 and 1/26/26, the sign-in sheets indicated names and signatures of QAPI committee members who attended the QAPI meeting. The sheets did not indicate that the MD was present during the meetings.During an interview on 3/20/26 at 2:33 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM confirmed the MD did not attend the QAPI meeting on 7/29/25 because he was out of the country. The ADM further stated the MD did not assign a designee to attend the meeting. The ADM also stated that the MD was present via telephone during the QAPI meeting on 1/26/26 but forgot to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent (process to ensure resident is fully informed of the potential risks and benefits) for one of twenty-four sampled residents (Resident 49) when Resident 49 was administered a psychotropic medication (medication that affects the mind, emotions, and behavior) prior to obtaining an informed consent. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 49 not being fully aware of the medication's benefits, risks, and side effects. A review of Resident 49's admission Record indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with multiple diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (stroke- loss of blood flow to the brain causing brain cell death), displaced fracture of left olecranon process (elbow fracture), bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), and depression (mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Resident 49's admission Record indicated Resident 49 was his own Responsibility Party (RP).A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 11) when: Resident 11 was prescribed a psychotropic medication (drug that treats mental illnesses such as anxiety, by altering brain chemistry) Lorazepam (a benzodiazepine used to treat anxiety disorders. Common side effects include dizziness, drowsiness, and weakness) without adequate monitoring.This failure had the potential for Resident 11 to experience drowsiness, dizziness, or weakness increasing Resident 11's risk for falls.During a review of Resident 11's Facesheet (a one-page medical document summarizing a patient's key demographic, insurance, and clinical data) indicated, Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in February 2026.During a review of Resident 11's Order Summary Report dated 3/19/26, Report indicated, an order for: LORazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Lorazepam) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 2 hours as needed for mild anxiety Active 2/17/26, LORazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Lorazepam) Give 2 tablets by mouth every 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) accurately reflected the resident's health status for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 50) when Resident 50's MDS Section K Swallowing/Nutritional Status was not accurately documented.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 50 not receiving treatments and services consistent with Resident 50's needs.During a review of Resident 50's admission records, the records indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not make and release enough hormone into the bloodstream), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), and adjustment disorder (excessive reactions to stress that involve negative thoughts, strong emotions and changes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 34 and Resident 62) were assisted with Activities of Daily living (ADL- normal daily functions required to meet basic needs) when fingernails were long and unclean. These failures had the potential for Resident 34 and Resident 62 to sustain injury and/or infection. 1a. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 34 was admitted June of 2024 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), affecting right dominant side and cerebral infarction (a type of stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain). Resident 34's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) dated 12/11/25 indicated Resident 34 had moderate cognitive impairment with a score of 12. A review of Resident 34's care plan initiated 6/14/24 indicated Resident 34 had self care deficit requiring assistance or is dependent in personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided according to professional standards of care for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 74) when: 1. Resident 74's nebulizer (a small machine that turns liquid medicines into mist to deliver medication) tubing was not replaced every 7 days; and,2. Resident 74's oxygen use was not accurately documented. These failures had the potential to result in respiratory infection and undetected deterioration of respiratory function for Resident 74. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 74 was readmitted early February 2026 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and acute respiratory failure (lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) with hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in the blood). A review of Resident 74's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March indicated the following physician orders:-Ipratropium- Albuterol solution (used to treat breathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had an annual performance review for one of five sampled CNA staff (CNA 3).This failure had the potential for CNA 3 to provide inadequate care to residents.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/19/26, at 12:14 p.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD) CNA 3's personnel file was reviewed. CNA 3's personnel file indicated, he was hired on 2/4/25. Personnel file indicated, no annual performance review was completed. DSD stated, I am not sure how we track when they [annual performance reviews] are due. DSD stated, he did not see an annual performance review in the file, and there should be one in the personnel file. During a review of the facility's Employee Handbook dated 2023, Handbook indicated, Performance Evaluations, Performance feedback should be on-going between supervisors and employees. However, we established annual, documented reviews as a standard to formalize an interactive conversation about what is going well, where there could be improvements, goals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent (%)) when two medications out of 31 opportunities were not given in accordance with the physician's orders for two residents (Resident 93 and Resident 79). This failure resulted in a medication error rate of 6.45%.1a. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 93 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (sudden, severe infection of the bone) of left ankle and foot and sepsis (a life- threatening blood infection). A review of Resident 93's Order Summary Report indicated Resident 93 had an order for Prasugrel (antiplatelet or blood thinner- medication used to prevent blood clots) HCL (hydrochloride) 10 milligram (mg, unit of measurement) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Antiplatelet therapy on 3/6/26. During a medication pass observation on 3/18/26 starting at 7:23 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 6 (LN 6), Resident 93's Prasugrel 10 milligram was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written agreement was obtained for services furnished by outside resources for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 10) receiving dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidneys have failed). This failure had the potential to result in the lack of accountability in the dialysis services. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 10 was admitted October of 2025 with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease (build up of fat or cholesterol in the heart's arteries causing them to narrow and harden) and end stage renal disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure). A review of Resident 10's physician order dated 3/6/26 indicated, HEMODIALYSIS AT [Dialysis company name and address] .MWF [Monday, Wednesday, Friday] .During an interview on 3/19/26 at 4:36 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he would look for the agreement between the facility and the dialysis clinic. During a follow up interview on 3/20/26 at 12:04 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 15 & Resident 19) when:The facility did not implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP: an infection control strategy in nursing homes requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care for residents at risk of carrying multidrug-resistant organisms) for Resident 15 andFacility staff left soiled linens and trash on Resident 19's bed.These failures had the potential to spread communicable disease to an at risk population.1.During an observation on 3/17/26, at 10:21 a.m., Resident 15's room did not have any isolation precautions signs. Multiple care staff were observed entering and exiting Resident 15's room without wearing PPE (Personal protective equipment). During an observation on 3/18/26, at 8:35 a.m., Resident 15's room did not have any isolation precautions signs.During a review of Resident 15's Facesheet (a summary document,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Policy and Procedures to process a refund for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when the resident's share of cost (the amount of money an individual is responsible to pay towards their medical related services, supplies, or equipment before Medi-Cal will begin to pay) was not returned to the family within 60 days upon Resident 1's death.This failure had the potential to result in fiduciary abuse and a violation of Resident 1's rights. Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated; Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with a diagnoses that included Encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition). The admission Record further indicated Resident 1 was their own responsible party. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive (having full understanding) Patterns, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of six sampled Residents (Resident 1) despite Resident 1's admitting diagnosis of stimulant (drugs that increase the activity of the central nervous system) use and a positive illicit drug test results from the urine drug screening during the recent hospitalization. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for undetected drug use or relapse, undetected overdose that could result in medical emergency and had the potential for delayed delivery of care and mental health decline. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility mid-2025 with a diagnoses of deep skin infection caused by bacteria and other stimulant abuse. A review of Resident1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 5/15/25, the BIMS indicated Resident 1 had a score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 5/14/25, the OSR indicated, .Resident has mental capacity to make decisions. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported within the required timeframe for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when an allegation of abuse was not reported per facility policy. This failure of timely reporting had the potential to cause a delayed response by enforcement agencies to ensure resident safety. Findings: A review of a facility document, dated 1/15/25 and received by the Department on 1/15/25, indicated an allegation of suspected dependent adult/elder abuse had been made related to an employee to resident verbal and physical abuse between Registry Staff 1 (RS 1) and Resident 1. During an interview, on 1/17/25 at 12:49 p.m., Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) confirmed that the allegation was reported to her on 1/9/25 and she did not report it to the Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator (APC). During an interview, on 1/17/25 at 1:33 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) confirmed she heard the allegation of abuse on 1/9/25 at the nurse ' s station and acknowledged that it was not reported to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received care which met professional standards when he was involved in an employee to resident abuse allegation, and it was not documented by nursing and social services department. This failure resulted in inaccurate assessment documentation and had the potential to result in unmet nursing and psychosocial needs for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated he was last admitted in late 2024 with diagnoses including encephalopathy (brain dysfunction) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record included the following documents: A Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/23/24, indicated Resident 1 had severe memory impairment. A Skilled Services Documentation, dated 1/8/25 and 1/15/25, indicated no documented evidence of abuse allegation. Further review of document indicated no body check was done on Resident 1, no documented evidence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect resident privacy when tray tickets were thrown into the trash for a census of 87 who were eating facility prepared meals This failure had the potential for 87 residents' personal and health information unprotected form unintended access. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 1/6/25 at 9:49 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) showed the path taken of kitchen trash to the outside dumpsters in the parking lot. The parking lot was not gated or secured from the public. During a return visit on 1/7/25 at 8:46 a.m., Diet Aide 1 (DA 1) was washing the breakfast dishes. She removed the trays from the cart, dumped leftover food and paper products (including at least 12 tray tickets) into the garbage can, before separating like items for wash. When questioned, DA 1 stated this was her usual process. During a subsequent interview on 1/7/25 at 8:58 a.m., with the DS, the DS stated the tray tickets should be placed in a bin (found in the dry storage) that collected paper for shredding. The DS further stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and provide care for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 1) when no wound care orders, monitoring, or care plans were created for Resident 1's left great toe wound. This failure placed Resident 1 at increased risk for wound deterioration and infection. Findings: Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility 12/13/24 with diagnoses which included hardening of left leg arteries, diabetes (a condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), vascular disease that occurs when diabetes damages blood vessels, reducing blood flow to organs, and gangrene (dead tissue caused by an infection or lack of blood flow). During a review of Resident 1's SKILLED NURSING FACILITY admission ORDERS dated 12/13/24, the orders indicated, Diagnosis .GANGRENE OF LEFT TOE .wound .Anterior Left Toe. During a review of Resident 1's admission NURSING ASSESSMENT, undated (uploaded into electronic record 12/17/24), the assessment indicated, Left Great Toe Meta [illegible] Joint Black Toe Nail (sic). During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for a census of 87 residents when: 1. An unsealed e-kit (emergency supply kit) was found in the medication storage room, which resulted in prescription medications being at risk for diversion and use without a prescription. 2. An e-kit was previously accessed multiple times without medications being replaced by the pharmacy which had a potential to cause harm by not having enough emergency medication for the residents. These failures had the potential for drug diversion, medication errors, and not having medications readily available in emergency situations. Findings: 1. During the medication storage room observation on 1/6/25 at 12:05 p.m. in the first-floor medication storage room with Licensed Nurse (LN) 8, an IV (Intravenous, medications given through the veins) e-kit #368 was observed unlocked. Inside e-kit, there was a bag of yellow zip-ties in a bag sitting on top of multiple prescription medications and medical supplies. During an interview on 1/6/25 at 12:05…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 87 sampled Residents (Resident 10, Resident 30 and Resident 25) were free from unnecessary antipsychotic medications (drugs that alter a person's thoughts, feelings, moods, awareness, and behaviors used to treat mental health conditions) when: 1. An Antipsychotic was prescribed for treatment of schizoaffective disorder (a condition that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly with mood symptoms) in a dosage indicative for treatment of sleep disturbance without an FDA approved diagnosis for Resident 10. 2. An Antipsychotic was prescribed for Resident 30 with no previous documented serious mental health diagnosis prior to admission. 3. Resident 25 received an as needed antianxiety medication without a 14 day stop date. These failures placed Resident 10 and Resident 30 at an increased risk for adverse drug effects and Resident 25 for receiving psychotropic medication without proper evaluation. Findings: 1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 01/2017 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication rate did not exceed 5% for three of four sampled residents (Resident 16, 486, and 55) for a census of 87 when five medication errors occurred out of 29 opportunities that resulted in 17.2% medication error rates. 1. For Resident 16, a Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) administered Resident's calcium and vitamin D (a supplement used to raise calcium and vitamin D levels), not in accordance with Physician Orders when one tablet of calcium 600mg (milligram, unit of measurement) + 400 units (unit, a measurement) vitamin D was administered when the physician ordered calcium-vitamin D tablet 600-200mg/unit, give 2 tablets by mouth one time a day. 2. For Resident 486, a Licensed Nurse 7 (LN 7) did not administer hydroxyzine (a medication used to treat anxiety and tension caused by nervous and emotional conditions) when hydroxyzine was not stocked on the medication cart nor available for administration. 3. For Resident 55, LN 2: a. did not administer buspirone (a medication that treats anxiety) when it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled correctly, when: 1. Unopened insulin pens were not kept refrigerated, 2. Opened multidose inhalers did not have open dates to determine expiration dates, 3. Personal items and non-pharmaceutical items were stored in a medication cart and a medication room, 4. Expired insulin pens were not discarded and still available for use, 5. Loose pills were found in a medication carts and a medication room, 6. Prescription pharmaceutical products did not have patient specific labels, and 7. A prescription blister pack and a prescription eye drop were dropped in the back of a medication cart and not accessible to be used for Resident's needs. These failures had the potential for accidental use of expired medications, drug diversion, infection control risk, and safety risk for a census of 87. Findings: 1. a. During a medication cart check of medication cart #1 on 1/6/25 starting at 11:17 a.m. at the first-floor nurse's station with LN 4, a Basaglar Kwikpen (an insulin pen used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food storage and preparation in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Kitchen containers and steam table pans were found stored wet, 2. Several food items in freezer and refrigerator were not securely closed, 3. A stored steam table pans found to have food residue in the pan, 4. Red cutting board for meat found with deep grooves, 5. Shelf under cook's food preparation table was found with rust and white discoloring, and 6. Floor drain near cook's station had green-colored build up around drain along with chipped and worn flooring. Theses failures had the potential of leading to food borne illness for 87 residents out of a census of 87 who are eating facility prepared foods. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 1/6/25 at 9 a.m., 2 kitchen containers and container lids, 2 carafes, and 4 steam table pans were observed stored wet. During a concurrent interview on 1/6/25 with Dietary Supervisor (DS), DS stated, The kitchen equipment should be clean and dry before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident refrigerator and microwave for staff to store and heat residents' food. This failure had the potential of leading to poor food intake, weight loss, and food borne illness for the 87 residents eating meals. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 1/6/25 at 9:09 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated that resident food was not kept in the kitchen and that residents did not have a place to store food in the facility. During an interview on 1/8/25 at 9:12 a.m. on the first floor with Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4), the handling of food from outside sources was discussed. LN 4 stated residents were allowed food from outside, and staff would check the food against the diet order to see if the food was appropriate before giving to the resident. When the resident had finished eating, the food would not be kept as the facility had no refrigerator or microwave for resident food. During an interview on 1/8/25 at 9:28 a.m., on the second floor with Certified Nursing Assistant 5 (CNA 5), CNA 5 explained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 residents (Residents 32, 53, 61 and 57) in a census of 87 when: 1. Resident 32's nebulizer (machine that turns liquid medication into a mist so that it can be breathed directly into the lungs through a face mask or mouthpiece) and Resident 53 and Resident 61's oxygen tubings were not covered or labeled, and when 2. Resident 57's urinary catheter (a thin tube used to drain urine from the bladder to an outside collection bag) was found touching the floor multiple times during the survey period. These failures increased the potential for infection for the residents . Findings: 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2024 with diagnoses which included irregular heartbeat and not having enough healthy red blood cells. During a review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 41) when Resident 41's medication to treat high blood sugars was not given as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 41 to have unmanaged blood sugars. Findings: Resident 41 re-admitted to the facility late 2023 with diagnoses which included trouble controlling his blood sugars. During a review of Resident 41's Order Summary Report [OSR], order start date of 12/4/23, the OSR indicated, HumaLOG [fast acting insulin that is used to lower blood sugar] Inject as per sliding scale: if 70-150=NONE; 151-200=NONE; 201-250=1; 251-300=2 NOTIFY MD [medical doctor] if BS [blood sugar] is < [less than] 70 or > [greater than] 301, intramuscularly at bedtime . During a review of Resident 41's Medication Administration Record [MAR], dated 11/1/24-12/31/24, the MAR indicated Resident 41 had a BS of 340 on 11/3/24, a BS of 320 on 11/6/24 and a BS of 304 on 12/2/24. The MAR indicated Humalog was not administered on any of these dates with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement wound prevention measures for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 65) when Resident 65's heel foam protectors were not put on per physician order. This failure had the potential to worsen or complicate Resident 65's wound. Findings: Resident 65 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses that included diabetes (disorder causing blood sugar to be high) and non-pressure open wound to heels. A review of Resident 65's, Wound Physician Consultation Note [WPCN], dated 12/30/24, indicated Resident 65 had a stage three pressure ulcer (damage to the skin from prolonged pressure ranging from stage one to stage four with four being the most severe) to his left heel and a stage two pressure ulcer to his right heel. The WPCN indicated there was no change in the wound status since the last visit. A review of Resident 65's Order Details (OD), dated 1/2/25, indicated, TX [treatment]- Apply foam booties [foam placed on heels to prevent wound or wound progression] as tolerated when in bed. Three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain Resident 14's weight when resident 14 lost 14.5% of his body weight in a 6-month period. This failure had the potential of leading to malnutrition and increased mortality. Findings: During the initial dining observation on 1/7/25 at 12:04 p.m., in the dining room, resident 14 was observed eating his meal. Resident 14 was noted to eat independently but was easily distracted and needed to be redirected to eat twice. Resident 14 left the dining room with approximately 50% of his meal consumed. During an observation on 1/8/25 at 12:03 p.m. in the dining room, Resident 14 had finished eating his lunch meal having eaten most of the hamburger but no other tray items. During an observation on 01/09/25 at 11:48, in the dining room, Resident 14 ate 1 (4 ounce) ice cream container, drank 100% of an 8 ounce milk carton, and few bites of the pasta entree. During a review of resident 14's electronic record on 1/7/25 at 3:04 p.m., Resident 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and consistent medical records for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 41) when: 1. Resident 1's progress notes (PN) did not include any reason medications were not administered; and 2. Resident 41's insulin (a medication to treat high blood sugars) administration documentation was inconsistent. These failures created inaccurate health records which increased the potential for incorrect assessment of the residents and for creating miscommunication among healthcare professionals regarding the residents health status. Findings: Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility in late 2024 with diagnoses which included a condition in which the heart does not pump adequately, progressive damage and loss of kidney function, high blood pressure, and irregular rapid heart rate that causes poor blood flow. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report [OSR], dated 1/7/24, the OSR indicated, Metoprolol Tartrate [medication to treat high blood pressure and heart failure] .two times a day for htn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported within the required timeframe for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 6), when the Department did not recieve a report of the alleged sexual abuse incident within two hours of occurence. This failure to report timely had the potential to compromise vulnerable residents' health and safety. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (brain condition in which the mind does not agree with reality), difficulty walking; spinal stenosis in lumbar region (nerve damage to lower back); and cognitive communication deficit (mental processing communication problem). A review of an admission record indicated, Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive decrease in brain function with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when he was struck in the head and chest several times by Resident 2. This failure had the potential to result in serious physical harm. Findings: According to Resident 1's admission record, he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Degeneration of Nervous System Due to Alcohol (trouble with balance and body coordination due to chronic alcohol use) and anxiety. A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 4/24/24, indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment. A nursing note, dated 6/9/24, indicated Resident 1 had been involved in a resident to resident altercation on 6/8/24. The note indicated Resident 1 had been hit in the chest and head area 4-5 times by Resident 2. According to Resident 2's admission record, he was last admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Antiphospholipid Syndrome (a disorder of the immune system that can cause blood clots) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported within the required timeframe for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when an allegation of abuse was not reported to the Department until the following day. This failure to report timely had the potential to compromise resident health and safety. Findings: A review of a facility document, Report Of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse , dated 6/8/24 and received by the Department on 6/9/24, indicated an allegation of suspected abuse had been made related to a resident to resident altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2. In an interview, on 6/24/24 at 12:22 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated it was the facility's policy to report an allegation of abuse to the Department within 2 hours. The DON 1 confirmed the 6/8/24 allegation had not been reported to the Department until 6/9/24. A review of the facility's policy titled, Elder/Dependent Adult Abuse, revised 7/17, indicated reports of physical abuse would be made within two hours to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible for seven of 28 sampled residents (Resident 70, Resident 43, Resident 6, Resident 26, Resident 10, Resident 27, and Resident 64), when the call light buttons were not reachable. This failure increased the potential staff would not be alerted to resident needs or emergencies, and the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease), anxiety and heart failure. During a review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 9/29/23, the MDS indicated Resident 70 had severe memory impairment. During a review of Resident 70's undated Nursing Care Plan (NCP) titled, Communication Deficit R/T [related to]Dementia, the NCP indicated, Keep call light within reach .All Staff . During and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for two of 28 sampled residents (Resident 50 and Resident 3), when: 1. No care plan was developed or implemented on smoking for Resident 50; and 2. No care plan was developed or implemented on wound care for Resident 3. These failures had the potential to result in residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease). During a review of Resident 50's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/26/23, the MDS indicated Resident 50 was alert and oriented. During a review of Resident 50's document titled, Smoking Safety Evaluation [SSE], dated 11/1/23, the SSE indicated Resident 50 smoked 2-5 times a day. During a review of Resident 50's Nursing Care Plan (NCP) titled, Resident wishes to smoke and is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its pharmaceutical policies and procedures for a census of 85 when an expired E-Kit (Emergency-Kit, storage box containing emergency supplies of medication) was not removed and replaced with the potential for not having all the emergency medications available to the residents and increased risk of drug diversion. Findings: During an inspection of medication room on [DATE] at 9:40 a.m. on the second floor, E-kit #1043 was found to be previously opened by the staff on [DATE] at 1600 [4 p.m.] and then again on [DATE] at 0800 [8 a.m.] and 2100 [9 p.m.], but it was not replaced by the pharmacy. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:41 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 stated, the E-kit was originally opened on [DATE] and twice again on [DATE]. I [LN 2] called the pharmacy today [[DATE]] to replace it. It needs to be replaced to have all the medications available for the residents. If not replaced right away other staff can gain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly according to the facility's policies and procedures for a census of 85, when: 1. An expired medication was available for Resident 17 to use in the medication cart which put residents 17 at risk of receiving an expired medication; 2. A tube of prescription medication was found in a treatment cart without a resident specific pharmacy label; 3. The temperature of a medication refrigerator on the second floor was out of range, which put medication requiring a specific temperature at risk of degradation; and, 4. An opened and used multidose vial of a testing solution, with a shorter expiration date when opened, did not have an open date which put residents at risk of having inaccurate test results. Findings: 1. During an inspection of medication cart 1 on [DATE] at 12:41 p.m. on the third floor, an expired insulin glargine pen (medication to treat high blood sugar levels) for Resident 17 was found in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when: 1. Dietary staff and vendors did not wear face masks during a Covid outbreak in the facility; 2. Trays were stored upright to dry; 3. Foods were not labeled with received, opened and/or use by date; and 4. Dietary Aid touched face with gloved hands and then touched the rim of tumblers meant for resident drinks. These failures increased the potential for food-borne illnesses and communicable diseases. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/11/23 at 8:10 a.m., the [NAME] opened the kitchen door and was noted not wearing a facial mask. The [NAME] was asked if kitchen staff were required to wear a mask with Covid in the facility and said, We don't go to patient area. I'll get a mask. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/11/23 at 8:18 a.m., the Fire Safety Contractor (FSC) was noted to be up on a ladder in the kitchen and not wearing a facial mask. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee, a component of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) for a census of 85, when: 1. The QAA did not meet at least quarterly in 2023; and 2. The QAA committee meeting did not have the required members in attendance. This failure had the potential for quality care improvement activities to not be evaluated and revised as needed and the potential to negatively impact the quality of resident care. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/14/23 at 1:32 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON reviewed the 2023 QAPI program binder looking for the quarterly QAA/QAPI committee meeting sign-in sheets. The DON acknowledged the facility could only produce a completed sign in sheet for the QAA/QAPI committee meeting that occurred on 10/27/23 and did not provide the other three quarters for the year. During an interview on 12/14/23 at 2:24 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated his goal was for QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure smoking policies were established, managed and implemented for safety on both smoking and non-smoking residents in accordance with applicable laws and regulations for three out of 28 sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 50, and Resident 68) in a census of 85, when: 1. Resident 50 possessed and used a cigarette lighter in his room; 2. Resident 4 kept her own smoking paraphernalia in her room and provided cigarettes to other residents; and 3. Resident 68 kept his cigarettes and lighter and went to smoke outside the facility with no staff supervision. These failures had the potential to result in an increased risk of accidents, burns and injuries. Findings: During a review of the facility document titled, SMOKING LIST, dated 11/27/23, the document indicated 11 residents on the list who smoke independently, which included Resident 4, Resident 50 and Resident 68. 1. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 41), when the Department received the report of allegation of abuse greater than two hours after the facility was made aware of the allegation. This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect vulnerable residents and provide a safe environment. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS: an assessment tool), dated 11/29/23, the MDS indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in the summer of 2019, with intact memory and cognition and diagnoses that include a history of stroke and weakness on one side of the body. During an interview on 12/11/23 at 11:45 a.m. with Resident 41, Resident 41 alleged, Licensed Nurse 6 (LN 6) raised his hand at me and added LN 6 made a balled up fist raised it over his head as if he would hit Resident 41. Resident 41 expressed, during this alleged incident, LN 6 had been intimidating. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 3:21 p.m. with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) accurately reflected the resident's current condition for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 83), when the discharge MDS indicated the resident was discharged to an acute hospital. This failure resulted in Resident 83's MDS inaccurate assessment data submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare-Medicaid Services). Findings: Resident 83 was admitted to the facility in the middle of 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included unsteadiness on feet and a history of falling. During a review of Resident 83's Notice of Transfer/Discharge (NT/D) dated 10/2/23, the NT/D indicated, [Resident 83] will be transferred/discharged to home on [DATE] for the following reason(s) .The resident's health has improved sufficiently . During a review of Resident 83's Order Summary Reports (OSR) dated 10/2/23, the OSR indicated, Resident [83] may discharge to home on [DATE] with home health nurse. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan after a fall for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 25). This failure increased the risk Resident 25 would not reach the highest practicable well being and have his needs met. Findings: Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, abnormal posture, cerebral infarction (stroke), and low back pain. During a review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/7/23, the MDS indicated Resident 25 was alert and oriented. During a review of Resident 25's document titled, Fall Risk Screen (FRS), effective 11/7/23, the FRS indicated, Has the resident ever fallen .Yes. During a review of Resident 25's Nursing Care Plan (NCP) titled, High risk for falls and injury related to [limb description] amputation, Poor balance, Unsteady gait, dated 11/8/23, the NCP indicated, Goal .Resident will be able to adjust to a change in the usual environment and routine to prevent falls and injury through the next review .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents' physician was notified when two blood pressure medications were not given to Resident 39. This failure had the potential for Resident 39's blood pressure to be elevated and compromised hemodynamic (basic measures of heart function) stability. Findings: During an observation of medication administration on 12/11/23 at 8:15 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 was observed to prepare and administer Resident 39's morning medications which did not include two blood pressure medications. During a review of Resident 39's Order Summary Report, dated 12/13/23, the Order Summary Report indicated, Resident 39 had an order for amlodipine [a medication to lower blood pressure] 5 mg [milligram, unit of measure] give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN [Hypertension, high blood pressure] and an order for lisinopril [a medication to lower blood pressure] 20 mg give 2 tablets by mouth in the morning for BP [blood pressure]. During an interview on 12/11/23 at 8:30 a.m. with LN 3, LN 3 stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services were met according to professional standards of practice for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 44) receiving dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluids from the blood when the kidneys are not able to), when transportation to and from dialysis was not provided timely. This failure resulted in Resident 44's emotional stress, and had the potential to result in undetected complications such as increased fluid retention and toxic substances in the blood. Findings: Resident 44 was admitted to the facility in late 2023 with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (ESRD, the kidneys can no longer support the body's needs), dependence on renal (kidney, organ that filters waste material out of the blood) dialysis. During a review of Resident 44's Clinical Laboratory Results (CLR), dated 10/18/23, the recent CLR indicated highly elevated creatinine at 7.7 (normal = 0.6 to 1.4) which indicated high amounts of waste products in the blood not filtered by the kidney. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure irregularities reported by the pharmacist to the attending physician were acted upon for one out of 28 sampled residents (Resident 70) in a census of 85. This failure increased the potential for a PRN (as needed) antipsychotic being given without adequate indication. Findings: Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's (memory loss), anxiety, heart failure, and schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). During a review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 9/29/23, the MDS indicated Resident 70 had severe memory impairment. During a review of Resident 70's document titled, Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review [MRR] dated 10/1/23 through 10/31/23, indicated IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] recommends to provide a 14 day term of therapy. Per [federal regulatory body] Megarules effective November 28, 2017; If the prescriber believes the resident requires an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor food preferences for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 435), when the resident did not receive hard boiled eggs at lunch. This failure increased the potential for the resident not to reach his highest practicable well being. Findings: Resident 435 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (a serious condition where your blood glucose level is too high) and depression. During a review of Resident 435's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 12/7/23, the MDS indicated Resident 435 was alert and oriented, able to make his needs known. During a review of Resident 435's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 12/7/23, the OSR indicated, CCHO [Consistent or Controlled Carbohydrate] diet Regular texture . During a review of Resident 435's document titled Dietary Profile [DP] /Malnutrition Risk Tool ., dated 12/8/23, the DP indicated, Food preferences .Likes: hard boiled egg for lunch . During a review of Resident 435's Nursing Care Plan (NCP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two out of 28 sampled residents (Resident 40 and Resident 77, and Resident 65) when: 1. Oxygen equipment was uncovered and unlabeled for Resident 65. 2. Stand fan was not cleaned for Resident 77; and 3. Urinal was unlabeled on top of the bedside table for Resident 40, and when 4. Resident 18's oxygen tubing was not changed in a timely matter. 5. Staff were not wearing N95 mask properly. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission of infection in a vulnerable population. Findings: 1. Resident 65 was admitted to the facility in the spring of 2023 with diagnoses which included cardiomyopathy (disease of the heart muscle) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat). During a review of the Order Summary Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light (a device to alert nursing staff when a resident is in need) was functioning for one resident (Resident 74) out of 28 sampled residents. This failure prevented Resident 74 from communicating his care needs and had the potential to delay care and treatments. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's Minimum Data Set (MDS: an assessment tool), dated 10/26/23, the MDS indicated Resident 74 was admitted to the facility in the fall of 2023, with diagnoses that included asthma (a disease in which the airways clog and narrow, making it hard to breathe). During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/11/23 at 10:32 a.m. in Resident 74's room, Resident 74 stated earlier that morning he had pressed his call light device in attempts to get his nurse to help with his asthma symptoms and added it had been a very long time. Resident 74 indicated he had been waiting and no one had responded to his call light. Resident 74 then pressed the call light button, but the device did not alert for help.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders were followed for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) when Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, a long thin flexible tube that is placed into a vein in your arm and goes into larger veins near your heart) care was not performed per professional standards, and medication was not given as ordered to Resident 3. These failures increased the risk for infection, and delayed healing. Findings: Resident (Res 1)1 admitted to the facility fall of 2023 with diagnoses which included sepsis (life threatening complication of an infection). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/3/23 at 3:17 p.m., with Res 1, in his bedroom. Observed Res 1's PICC dressing (a clear film with an adhesive boarder covering the insertion site of the PICC) to his right upper, inner arm. There were no date or initials on the dressing. Res 1 was asked if staff had changed his PICC dressing. Res 1 stated, They have not changed it since they put it in . During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage for a census of 82 when an externally used topical cream was commingled with oral medications, an opened insulin bottle was not dated, scattered loose pills were found in two medication carts, and an opened bottle acetic acid (liquid used in wound care) did not have an open date. These failures had the potential for residents to receive ineffective medications and placed residents at risk for cross contamination. During a concurrent interview and inspection of medication cart 1-station 1 on [DATE] at 1:44 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN 1) 1: One compartment in the top drawer of the medication cart contained a tube of Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream (medication used to treat skin conditions), a clear plastic bag containing eye drops, an opened bottle of eye drops, and multiple foil packages of pills. LN 1 verified the findings and stated the different medications should not be stored together in the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,302 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,302 — penalty dated 2024-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Bixby Towers Post-Acute RehabLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Berkley Post-AcuteVan Nuys, CA 3 of 5Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare CenterGardena, CA 3 of 5Lake Park Healthcare CenterOakland, CA 3 of 5Marina Pointe Healthcare & SubacuteCulver City, CA 3 of 5Mission Palms Healthcare CenterWestminster, CA 3 of 5Riverwood Health CareStockton, CA 3 of 5Sierra Vista HealthcareFresno, CA 3 of 5The Gardens Healthcare CenterNorthridge, CA 3 of 5Tracy Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterTracy, CA 4 of 5Alta Healthcare Center of CamarilloCamarillo, CA 4 of 5Country Crest Post-AcuteOroville, CA 4 of 5Lodi Nursing & RehabilitationLodi, CA 4 of 5North Park Post-AcuteTracy, CA 4 of 5San Juan Hills Healthcare CenterSan Juan Capistrano, CA 4 of 5South Marin Health & Wellness CenterGreenbrae, CA 4 of 5The Rehabilitation Center At The PalazzoPhoenix, AZ 4 of 5Villa Valencia Healthcare CenterLaguna Hills, CA 5 of 5Cottonwood Healthcare CenterWoodland, CA 5 of 5Greenridge Post AcuteEl Sobrante, CA 5 of 5Hillcrest Heights Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5La Casa Via Transitional Care CenterWalnut Creek, CA 5 of 5Oakland Heights Nursing And RehabilitationOakland, CA 5 of 5Pacific Heights Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Petaluma Post-Acute RehabilitationPetaluma, CA 5 of 5Stonebrook Health And RehabilitationLos Gatos, CA 5 of 5The Avenues Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5The Springs Healthcare Center At The CarlottaPalm Desert, CA 5 of 5University Post-Acute RehabSacramento, CA 5 of 5Woodlands Healthcare CenterLos Gatos, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SEQUOIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2023
MEAD, RANDALLIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/02/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$609K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 13%Other / private 17%

This home reported $609K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$465per resident / day
operating cost
$14,149per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$392per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056109. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next