No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mission Palms Healthcare Center

240 Hospital Circle, Westminster, CA 92683 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (714) 892-6686 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (714) 892-6686 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$13,923 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (16% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,923 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-27)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
7631 Wyoming St · (714) 898-0765 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7631 Westminster Blvd Ste D · (714) 893-2464 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
13930 Hoover St · (909) 583-4687 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Spring Street · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
13612 Hoover St · (714) 588-9072

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.4%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.5%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.5%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.1%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.092.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.421.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 445 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.75U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.46hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 144 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.9%CMS range 49.0–57.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 9.2–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 5.3–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.48
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
16.3%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 16% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-24)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-08-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to protect the resident's rights to be free from the physical abuse by the facility staff for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1 was slapped on the face by CNA 1 and sustained a redness to the right cheek. This failure had violated the resident's rights to be free from the abuse and negatively affected the resident's psychological well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse Prevention Program revised on 12/1/22, showed the facility should promote an environment free from any form of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation and/or mistreatment. Abuse is defined as willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including caretaker, of goods and services that are necessary to attain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure five of five final sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 2, 4, 11, 75, and 95) and one final sampled resident (Resident 13) reviewed for informed consents were provided the right to self-determination regarding the use of psychotropic medications and treatments. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consents for the quetiapine (antipsychotic) and mirtazapine (antidepressant) medications included the indication of use and manifested behavior for Resident 2. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent for the quetiapine medication included the indication for the use and manifested behavior for Resident 4. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent for the mirtazapine medication included the indication for the use and manifested behavior for Resident 11. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent for the lorazepam (antianxiety) medication included the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the respiratory care and services were provided in accordance with the professional standards for two of three final sampled residents (Residents 57 and 83) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 57's nasal cannula was placed properly positioned and the oxygen concentrator was functioning properly. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 83's Yankauer suction tubing was labeled. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving appropriate respiratory care and increased risks of the infection.Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 83 was initiated on 4/21/26. Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 83's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 4/14/26, to suction secretions as needed for excessive secretions. On 4/21/26 at 0915 hours, Resident 83 was observed lying in his bed. The Yankauer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from unnecessary medications for one of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 11) and two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 13 and 57). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 57's heart rate was monitored prior to administering the amlodipine (blood pressure medication) and lisinopril (blood pressure medication), as prescribed by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 13's heart rate was monitored prior to administering the diltiazem (blood pressure medication) and hydralazine (blood pressure medication), as prescribed by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 11's heart rate was monitored prior to administering the amlodipine (blood pressure medication), as prescribed by the physician. These failures placed the residents at risk for the adverse medication side effects when the ordered parameters were not followed and had the potential to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen and food storage areas. * Red tape marking the food-preparation area was placed too far inward, allowing staff and visitors access to milk without wearing required hair restraints. * One cup of milk was uncovered and contained a black particle floating on the surface. * A hair restraint was not worn to cover Maintenance Supervisor's chin beard while inside the kitchen. * A dusty portable fan was blowing air into the storage rack containing clean plate lids. * Two cutting boards in the food preparation area were heavily marred. * Brownish particles were observed inside the oven, located between two glass casings. * A 70% vegetable oil container stored inside the walk-in refrigerator was not labeled with an open date. These failures posed a risk of food borne illness to the 86 of 94 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's April 2026 Diet Type Report showed a total of 86 of 94 residents received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control program and practices. * The facility failed to ensure the staff members' personal items were not stored in the clean linen area. * The facility failed to conduct a facility-wide risk assessment to identify areas where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens (e.g. Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, Stenotrophomonas, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and fungi) could grow and spread within the facility water system. * The facility failed to protect the residents' clean personal clothing from dust and contamination during transport and Laundry Aide 2 failed to performed hand hygiene when entering and leaving EBP rooms. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 3 donned PPE when changing the linen for Resident 13, who was on EBP. These failures posed the risk of infection and the transmission of disease-causing microorganisms to highly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide a reasonable accommodations to meet the needs of one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 108). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 108's call light was within the resident's reach. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's psychosocial well-being and cause delays in receiving needed care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response revised 10/2025 showed the purpose of the policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bed side, toilet, and bathing facility to allow resident to call for assistance. Call light will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to facilitate appropriate response. Staff should facilitate call light placement within reach of resident and secure it as needed. The call system should be accessible to residents when in bed or other sleeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the written information and follow up assistance regarding the formulation of an advance directive for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 95) reviewed for advanced directives. * The facility failed to provide Resident 95 with written information on how to formulate an advanced directive. In addition, the facility failed to follow up and assist Resident 95 in completing an advanced directive. This failure had the potential for Resident 95 to receive care or emergency treatment that did not align with the resident's expressed wishes.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 95 was initiated on 4/22/26. Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 95's H&P examination dated 3/28/26, showed Resident 95 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 95's Advance Directives Acknowledgment dated 3/29/26, showed the resident had capacity, and would like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of five final sampled residents (Residents 2 and 11) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medication. * The facility failed to ensure accurate monitoring of meal intake related to the use of mirtazapine (antidepressant) for Residents 2 and 11. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary medication use and ineffective monitoring for the use of psychotropic medications, which could negatively affect the well-being of Residents 2 and 11.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Use of Psychotropic Medication revised 11/2025 showed the effects of the psychotropic medications on a resident's physical, mental, psychosocial well-being shall be evaluated on an ongoing basis, such as.in accordance with nurse assessments and medication monitoring parameters consistent with clinical standards of practice, manufacturer's specifications, and the resident's comprehensive plan of care. Medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide a copy of the notification of the transfer/discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one of the three residents (Resident 105) reviewed for closed records. * The facility failed to ensure copy of the transfer discharge notification was sent to the Ombudsman when Resident 105 was transferred to the acute care hospital. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not receiving accurate information regarding transfer/discharge status and the right to appeal.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Transfer or Discharge Notice revised December 2016 showed in part, the notice will be given as soon as it is practicable but before the transfer or discharge: a. The transfer is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility;b. The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 5). * The facility failed to develop a care plan problem to address Resident 5's use of LAL mattress with bolster (a medical grade mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure injuries by reducing moisture and heat buildup, with raised foam edges to support positioning and prevent rolling out of bed). This failure posed the risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care for Resident 5.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Comprehensive Assessments and the Care Delivery Process revised 12/2016 showed in part, comprehensive assessments will be conducted to assist in developing person -centered care plans. Comprehensive assessments, care planning and the care delivery process involve collecting and analyzing information, choosing and initiating interventions, and then monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive, person-centered care plan for three of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 5, 11, and 87). * The facility failed to revise Resident 5's care plan when the order for Foley Catheter (a thin, flexible, indwelling tube inserted through the urethra - a tube that transports urine from the bladder to the opening of penis in male and vulva in female, into the bladder to drain urine into a bag, held in place by a small balloon) was discontinued. This posed the risk of not providing the resident with individualized and person-centered care. * The facility failed to revise the plan of care for Residents 11 and 87 to address the adjustments to the APP mattress settings made for the residents' comfort. This failure had the potential to result in inconsistent interventions and place the residents at risk for inadequate pressure redistribution and skin breakdown.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 5). * The facility failed to identify and notify the physician and the resident's representative of Resident 5's eye redness with discharge. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the dark purplish discoloration on the resident's right dorsal (back side) hand and the light purplish discoloration on the left posterior lower arm were monitored and reported to the physician and responsible party. This failure had the potential for Resident 5 not to receive appropriate care and treatment.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised May 2017 showed the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical / mental condition and or/status. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development of pressure injuries for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 9) reviewed for pressure injuries. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 9's LAL mattress was used correctly and was not covered by an additional foam mattress topper. This failure had the potential to contribute to the development of new pressure injuries or worsening of existing pressure injuries for Resident 9.Findings: Review of the facility document titled Adapt Pro Elite Model 9200 User Manual showed the Adapt Pro Elite (type of LAL mattress) is intended to help and reduce the incidence of pressure sores while optimizing patient's comfort. Medical record review for Resident 9 was initiated on 4/21/26. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 9's H&P examination dated 3/11/26, showed the resident had the capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate pain management were provided for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 4) reviewed for pain management. * The facility failed to ensure the nonpharmacological interventions for pain management were provided before the administration of the pain medication for Resident 4. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 4 not receiving appropriate and comprehensive pain management.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pain Assessment and Management dated 3/2015 showed the purpose of the procedure was to help facility staff to identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address underlying causes of pain. Further review of the P&P showed nonpharmacological interventions may be appropriate alone or in conjunction with medications. Some non-pharmacological interventions include:- Environmental - adjusting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff demonstrated competency in providing care and identifying changes in condition for Residents 5 and 87. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 1 was competent in identifying eye redness with discharge in Resident 5 and notifying the physician and responsible party. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 2 was adequately trained and competent in the use of the APP machine for Resident 87. These failures had the potential to result in Residents 5 and 87 not receiving care and treatment in a safe and competent manner.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised May 2017 showed the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical / mental condition and or/status. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services were provided to maintain proper medication storage for one of three medication carts (Medication Cart A) inspected. * The facility failed to ensure the orally administered medications were stored separately from the externally used medications. This failure had the potential to have negative impact the residents' well-being, and the potential for the medications to be contaminated, lose stability, and effectiveness.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P title Storage of Medications revised 4/2007 showed drugs for external use, as well as poisons, shall be clearly marked as such, and shall be stored separately from other medications. On 4/22/26 at 1400 hours, a medication cart inspection for Medication Cart A was conducted with LVN 3. The following was observed: - one box of alendronate sodium (medication use to treat or prevent thinning of the bone) 7 mg tablets and 11 individually packaged pantoprazole DR (medication use to treat acid reflux) 40 mg suspensions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling of food brought for the residents from outside sources. * The facility failed to ensure two staff (CNA 3 and LVN 5) were knowledgeable regarding the facility's P&P for food brought in by families or visitors. In addition, the facility failed to follow its P&P requiring outside food be stored in a designated unit to ensure safety. These failures posed the risk of the residents not being able to enjoy foods brought from outside in a safe and accessible manner.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors revised 10/25 showed food was to be stored in a way to facilitate safety. Facility could store the food in a designated unit, and it was recommended the food was consumed within three days of preparation. On 4/22/26 at 1550 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the DSS. When asked about the refrigerator used to store food for the residents brought in from outside, the DSS showed the walk-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure coordination and consistency between the facility and hospice provider for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 13) reviewed on hospice services. * The facility failed to ensure the current frequencies of hospice staff visits as shown in the hospice plan of care were transcribed into Resident 13's physician's orders. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the hospice aide visit notes were maintained in the resident's medical record. These failures placed Resident 13 at risk for a breakdown in hospice care coordination and recordkeeping and could potentially result in delays in providing hospice care and services to Resident 13.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Hospice Program revised 7/2017 showed the following:- In general, it is the responsibility of the facility to [NAME] the resident's personal care and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and the facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the essential equipment was maintained in safe and operating condition for one of three glucometers (a device which measures the amount of sugar in the blood) inspected. * The facility failed to ensure the glucometer in Medication Cart A was calibrated and had quality control testing performed on 4/21/26. This failure had to result in inaccurate blood glucose readings for the residents of the facility requiring blood glucose monitoring.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Quality Control Testing on Assure Glucometer dated 10/1/23, showed quality control testing using the Assure Dose Control Solution will be performed to examine the performance of the Assure Blood Glucose Monitoring System. The Assure Dose Control Solution checks if the meter and test strips are working correctly as a system and if you are testing correctly. A control solution test should be performed every night. Review of the facility document titled Quality Control Record dated 4/2026 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure for a safe and comfortable environment for the staff, vendors, and visitors as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures at one kitchen handwash sink and the two compartment manual dishwashing sink were maintained at a safe and comfortable temperature level. This failure posed the risk of burn injuries to the staff, vendors, and visitors.Findings: Review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP Table 1, titled Time and Temperature Relationship to Serious Burns showed for a water temperature of 148 degrees Fahrenheit, the time required for a third degree burn to occur was two seconds. Further review of this table showed that for a water temperature of 150 degrees Fahrenheit, the time required for a third degree burn to occur was one second. On 04/21/26 at 1038 hours, the hot water from the kitchen handwash sink located near the DSS's office felt abnormally hot to the touch. Dietary Aide 1 verbalized the water was often very hot. The sinks inside the kitchen were observed with Caution - Hot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) remain free from the accident hazards. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was provided with two-person assistance for transfers. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for serious injuries. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 3/18/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Fall Risk Screen dated 3/7/25, showed Resident 1 was at high risk for falls and had a history of falls. Review of Resident 1's plan of care showed a care plan problem dated 3/8/25, addressing the resident's altered skin integrity. The interventions included to provide two-person assistance with transfers and positioning. Review of Resident 1's Nurse Weekly Progress Note dated 3/12/25, showed Resident 1 was dependent on the facility's staff for ADL care and required extensive assistance for transfers. On 3/17/25 at 0919 hours, CDPH, L&C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure six of six final sampled residents (Residents 11, 28, 32, 37, 44, and 685) reviewed for respiratory care were provided with the appropriate respiratory care and services when: * The facility failed to ensure Residents 11, 32, 37, 44, and 685 were receiving the correct rate of oxygen as per the physician's order. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 28's nebulizer set-up was changed weekly as per the facility's P&P. These failures had the potential to affect the respiratory health and well-being of the residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised October 2010 showed the staff member should verify that there is a physician's order for the oxygen administration and to review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. On 2/4/25 at 1425 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 44 was observed awake…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide 1 performed handwashing in between glove changes and performed proper hand hygiene and glove changes between dirty and clean areas during dishwashing. * The facility failed to ensure the rusty cooling steel racks were not stored with clean kitchen utensils. * The facility failed to ensure a spatula stored in a drawer had a smooth, easily cleanable surface. * The facility failed to ensure the plate lowerator and microwave were clean. * The facility failed to ensure kitchen employee belongings were not stored on a shelf used to store paper cups. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen thermometers were calibrated properly. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitizing solutions in the sanitizer buckets were checked and documented. * The facility failed to ensure the food preparation area was clean and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control program and practices as evidenced by: * Room A did not have a receptacle to dispose of used or soiled gowns. * The infection surveillance logs failed to accurately document the infections in the facility. * Mapping for infections did not accurately reflect all the HAIs. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 44's nasal cannula was stored in a sanitary manner. * The facility failed to ensure the medication carts were kept clean. * The facility failed to ensure the facility staff followed the EBP for Resident 688 as per the physician's order. These failures posed the risk for transmission and development of disease-causing microorganisms. Findings: 1. On 02/4/25 at 1400 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Room A was observed to be an Enhanced Barrier Precautions isolation room. Room A was observed without a receptacle to dispose of used gowns. On 02/4/25 at 1510…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the McGeer's Criteria for Infection Surveillance Checklist were completed for one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 685) reviewed for antibiotic medication use. This failure posed the risk of the continued use of unnecessary antibiotics, potentially resulting in adverse reactions associated with antibiotics and the development of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Findings: 1. On 2/7/25 at 1132 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 685 was conducted with the IP. The IP verified Resident 685 was administered two different antibiotics (azithromycin and cefepime) on 1/28/25 and one of the antibiotic (cefepime) dose was increased on 1/29/25. The IP verified she failed to complete the McGeer Criteria for Infection Surveillance Checklist to follow up on the use of the antibiotics. 2. On 2/6/25 at 1104 hours, an interview about the facility's infection control program was conducted with the IP. When asked how she was made aware of the infections in the facility, the IP stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 389) was safe to self-administer the medications found at the bedside. * The facility failed to ensure the bottles of ibuprofen (NSAIDs), and Advil (NSAIDs), several tablets of alpha-chymotrypsin (a digestive enzyme supplement), a tube of arthritis relief pain ointment (NSAIDs), and a bottle of dry relief eye drops (used to relieve irritation and discomfort caused by dry eyes) were not at Resident 389's bedside table. Resident 389 stated she administered the medications herself, however, Resident 389 was not assessed for safe self-administration of medications per her admission assessment. This failure had the potential for Resident 389 to administer the medications inaccurately, the risk of adverse reactions from the medications, and negatively affect Resident 389's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication - Self-Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for two of three final sampled residents (Residents 7 and 685) reviewed for falls. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 685's post fall neurological assessment was accurately completed after the resident had an unwitnessed fall on 2/4/25. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 7's post fall neurological assessment was accurately completed after the resident had a fall on 1/23/25. These failures had the potential for a delay in providing care to these residents. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Neurological Assessment revised October 2010 showed under Documentation Information, the assessment data obtained during the procedure, should be recorded in the resident's medical record. Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised July 2017 showed: - The medical record should facilitate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent further falls and/or injuries for one two of three final sampled residents (Resident 7) reviewed for falls. * The facility failed to implement Resident 7's care plan interventions to address the resident's risk for falls, including the resident fall risk monitoring, star sticker to the resident's room, and colored arm band. This failure post the risk for the resident to sustain further falls and/or injuries. Findings: Review of facility's P&P titled Managing Falls and Fall Risk revised on 3/2018 showed the staff member will monitor and document each of the resident's response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the risks of falling. Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 2/5/25. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 7's H&P examination dated 10/31/24, showed Resident 7 could make her needs known but could not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and the facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the acceptable parameters for fluid intake for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 9) reviewed for hydration status. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 9 was monitored when her fluid intake was above the parameter as documented by the CNAs. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the I&O Record documentation was accurate. This failure had the potential for Resident 9 to have fluid overload and negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Intake and Output revised date 10/12/20, under the Procedures for Measuring Intake section, showed the following: - The CNA shall measure and record oral fluids taken by the resident during meals and during care; - The CNA shall inquire from the resident, family members, and/or visitors if the resident has consumed additional fluids and record the volume; - The licensed nurse shall measure oral fluids taken by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring for the signs and symptoms of bleeding to ensure two of four final sampled residents (Residents 39 and 84) reviewed for anticoagulant (prevents blood clots) medication use were free from unnecessary drugs. * Residents 39 and 44 were administered with apixaban (Eliquis, blood thinner medication) without monitoring for the signs and symptoms of bleeding. These failures had the potential for the residents to develop significant side effects of bleeding and negatively affect the residents' health condition and well-being. Findings: According to DailyMed, the most common clinically adverse effect of the Eliquis medication was the risk of serious and potentially fatal bleeding. Review of the facility's P&P titled Anticoagulation - Clinical Protocol revised November 2018 showed the facility staff member should assess for any signs or symptoms related to adverse drug reactions due to the medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled residents (Resident 9) reviewed for unnecessary medications was free from the unnecessary psychotropic medication. * The facility failed to ensure the monitoring of Resident 9's meal intake related to the use of mirtazapine (antidepressant medication) medication was accurate. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the monthly behavior summary related to the use of mirtazapine medication was completed. These failures had to potential to result in unnecessary use and ineffective monitoring for the use of psychotropic medication that could negatively affect Resident 9's well-being. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 28 was initiated on 2/4/25. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 9's H&P examination dated 10/15/24, showed Resident 9 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 9's Order Summary Report showed the following physician's orders: -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure for the safe storage of the medications and supplies. * The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart F was not left unlocked and unattended. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the containers of the bleach wipes were not stored with a box of tuberculin syringe. * The facility failed to ensure the vitamin A&D ointment (barrier cream/ointment) was not kept at Resident 9's bedside. * The facility failed to ensure the eye and rectal medications were not stored together. These failures had the potential to result in the unsafe administration of medications, and cross-contamination of the medications. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Storage of Medications revised 4/2007 showed the following: - Antiseptics, disinfectants, and germicides used in any aspect of resident care must have legible, distinctive labels that identify the contents and the directions for use, and shall be stored separately from regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed. * The pureed mixed vegetable was not the same as the regular mixed vegetable with tofu. * The pureed beef was not served with a ladle of sauce per the recipe. These failures had the potential for residents on pureed diet not receiving adequate nutrition, and negatively affect their well-being. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Order Listing Report dated 2/4/25, showed 17 of 89 residents receiving foods prepared in the kitchen were on pureed diet. Review of the facility's P&P titled Menus revised 10/2017 showed deviations from posted menus are recorded (including the reason for the substitution and/or deviation) and archived. On 2/6/25 at 1018 hours, a pureed food preparation was observed with [NAME] 1, with the DSS present. [NAME] 1 was observed preparing the pureed mixed vegetables from a pan containing cooked broccoli, zucchini and carrots. There were cauliflowers nor tofu observed in the pan of cooked mixed vegetables. On 2/6/25 at 1145…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the facility staff assisted the residents regarding the use and storage of food brought in by the family member or visitors for the residents. * The facility failed to ensure the safe handling and storage of food from outside sources to be included in the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses to the medically vulnerable resident population who consume food brought from outside sources. Findings: Review of the CMS S&C-09-39 Food Procurement, and Self-Determination and Participation dated 5/29/09, showed the following: - The residents have the right to choose to accept food from visitors, family, friends, or other guests according to their rights to make choices; and - The facility has the responsibility under the food safety regulation to help visitors to understand safe food handling practices such as not holding or transporting foods containing perishable ingredients at temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was promptly assessed and notified to the physician and responsible party after a COC was identified as per the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive adequate care and risk for adverse complications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised on 5/2017 showed the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. The P&P also showed prior to notifying the Physician or healthcare provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider. The P&P further showed the nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an):…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the proper administration, storage, and disposal of the medications in a safe manner as evidenced by the following: * The facility failed to ensure the medications were not left unattended. * The facility failed to ensure the discontinued medications were properly stored and disposed. * The facility failed to ensure the expired lemon glycerin swab sticks and used sterile wound dressing supplies were disposed from the treatment cart. These failures had the potential to cause unsafe handling and storage of the residents' medications. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Storage of Medications revised April 2007 showed the nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. During an observation of Resident 58's room on 3/20/23 at 0845 hours, one medication cup containing seven medications observed unattended at Resident 58's bedside. During a concurrent interview with Resident 58, the resident was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the puree recipes were followed during the puree food preparation for 18 of 96 residents who received puree diets. This failure posed the risk for the inconsistent puree product which could alter the quality and nutrient content of the puree food for the residents receiving puree diets. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food Preparation dated 2018 showed the facility should prepared food by methods that conserve nutritive values, flavor and appearance. The facility will use approved recipes, standardized to meet the residents needs. The recipes are specific as to portion yield, method of preparation, amounts of ingredients, and time and temperature guide. 1. Review of the Stir Fry Vegetables, Puree dated 5/29/19, showed the ingredients for puree vegetables were as follows: five slices of wheat bread and four tablespoons of Margarine for ten portions. Instructions for puree vegetables included to add the margarine and bread while processing and process until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility's P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food preparation, storage, and sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were in the sanitary conditions. * The facility failed to ensure the meat slicer was in the sanitary conditions. * The facility failed to ensure that cooked items were properly stored, labeled, and dated. * The facility failed to ensure the temperature of beverages were checked prior distributing to the residents. * The facility failed to ensure the dietary staff maintained proper handling of dirty to clean plates and utensils. * The facility failed to ensure the dietary staff maintained proper hand hygiene. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness to a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 3/20/23, showed 85 of 96 residents in the facility received food prepared in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 5) was informed and provided education on mirtazapine (an antidepressant that affects a person's mental state) and quetiapine (an antipsychotic that affects a person's mental state) use prior to signing the informed consent. This failure had the potential to violate the resident's rights to be fully inform of the psychotropic medications use for Resident 5. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Informed Consent (undated) showed the facility must provide the information and obtain the consent for the use of psychotropic drugs (drugs that affect a person's mental state). Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 3/20/23. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease and dementia. Review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report for the month of March 2023 showed the following: - An order dated 2/13/23, for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to accommodate the individual needs and preferences for two of 20 final sampled residents (Residents 36 and 72) when the call lights button were placed out of the residents' reach. This failure could delay in providing the residents assistance to meet their needs. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Call Light Answering dated 3/2010 showed to place the call device within the resident's reach before leaving the room and if the call light/bell is defective, immediately report this information to the unit supervisor. 1. Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including S/P right leg below knee amputation, DM, PVD, and general weakness. Review of Resident 72's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 72 had a BIMS Score of 14 (cognitively intact), needed extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility and transfers, and had ROM impairment on one side of lower extremity. On 03/20/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 5)'s care plan was developed to be comprehensive and person-centered to address Resident 5's psychotropic medication use. This failure had the potential to cause unnecessary use of mirtazapine and quetiapine for Resident 5. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Center revised December 2016 showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan should be developed and implemented for each resident. Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 3/20/23. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of dementia. Review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report for the month of March 2023 showed the following: - an order started on 2/13/23, for mirtazapine tablet 7.5 mg at bedtime for depression manifested by poor food intake. - an order started on 2/13/23 for quetiapine tablet 25 mg at bedtime for psychosis manifested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of six nonsampled residents (Resident 4) was provided accurate doses of prescribed vitamin C (supplement). This failure had the potential to cause harm to Resident 4. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised December 2012 showed the dosage of a medication must be recorded in the resident's medical record. Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 3/20/22. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis including pressure induced deep tissue damage to the left and right heels. On 3/21/23 at 0753 hours, during the medication observation, LVN 2 prepared one tablet of vitamin C 500 mg tablet to Resident 4. Review of Resident 4's Order Summary Report for the month of March 2023 showed an order started on 3/10/23, for vitamin C oral tablet (Ascorbic Acid) one tablet by mouth two times a day for supplement.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 final sampled residents (Resident 5) was provided the comprehensive assessment and management for the use of psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's assessment and diagnose of Resident 5 were completed and documented for the use of mirtazapine and quetiapine. * The facility failed to document the non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to the administration of mirtazapine and quetiapine for Resident 5. These failures had the potential to cause harm to Resident 5. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated October 2017 showed the facility should ensure that a physician/prescriber has conducted a comprehensive assessment of the resident and has documented in the clinical record that the psychopharmacological medication is necessary. Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 3/20/23. Resident 5 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the hand hygiene practices were performed before patient contact and after glove use. This failure posed the risk of spreading infectious organism to residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Control Guidelines for All Nursing Procedures revised August 2012 showed the conditions for performing hand hygiene include before and after patient contact, before preparing and handling medications, and after removing gloves. - On 3/20/23 at 1135 hours, during the medication administration observation for Resident 29, LVN 1 was observed wearing gloves while cleaning a glucometer (a machine to measure blood sugar) and medication tray. After cleaning the glucometer and medication tray, LVN 1 removed the old gloves and immediately put on new gloves. Hand hygiene was not observed before and after removing the contaminated gloves. LVN 1 proceeded to obtain Resident 29's blood sugar finger prick. - On 3/20/23 at 1155 hours, during the medication administration observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-05-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records for two of four sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3). * Resident 2's neurological assessments were incomplete, and the resident's IDT Note was completed three days after the IDT meeting was conducted. * Resident 3's Physician Progress Note was dated as completed one week after the resident had been transferred to the acute care hospital and was no longer in the facility. These failures resulted in medical records that contained incomplete or inaccurate information, which could negatively affect continuity of care.Findings: 1. Closed medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on 5/15/26. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 3's SBAR Communication Form dated 5/6/26, showed the resident was found on the floor in the resident's room, complained of head pain, and 911 was called. Review of the facility's midnight Daily Census for 5/14/26, showed Resident 3 was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to not receive care and assistance when needed. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Call Light Answering revised 12/2023 showed the facility is to provide the resident a means of communication with nursing staff. One procedure includes to place the call device within resident's reach before leaving room. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 1/23/24. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's H&P examination dated 3/22/23, showed the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 2's care plan titled Communication Deficit R/T English being not her primary language and advance age dated 12/3/21, showed the interventions included to keep the call light within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-03-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessments were accurately completed for two of 20 final sampled residents (Residents 5 and 91). This posed the risk of the residents not receiving an individualized plan of care based on the residents' specific needs. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P Resident Assessment Instrument revised 4/2021 showed the MDS Coordinator will ensure information is accurately entered into a resident's database. 1. Medical record review for Resident 91 was initiated on 3/20/23. Resident 91 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 91 was transferred to the acute care hospital on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. The medical record also showed Resident 1 was discharged to home on 1/7/23. On 3/22/23 at 1118 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the MDS Coordinator. The MDS Coordinator was asked when Resident 91 was discharged from the facility. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident 91 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,923 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,923 — penalty dated 2024-08-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Bixby Towers Post-Acute RehabLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Woodland Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 3 of 5Berkley Post-AcuteVan Nuys, CA 3 of 5Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare CenterGardena, CA 3 of 5Lake Park Healthcare CenterOakland, CA 3 of 5Marina Pointe Healthcare & SubacuteCulver City, CA 3 of 5Riverwood Health CareStockton, CA 3 of 5Sierra Vista HealthcareFresno, CA 3 of 5The Gardens Healthcare CenterNorthridge, CA 3 of 5Tracy Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterTracy, CA 4 of 5Alta Healthcare Center of CamarilloCamarillo, CA 4 of 5Country Crest Post-AcuteOroville, CA 4 of 5Lodi Nursing & RehabilitationLodi, CA 4 of 5North Park Post-AcuteTracy, CA 4 of 5San Juan Hills Healthcare CenterSan Juan Capistrano, CA 4 of 5South Marin Health & Wellness CenterGreenbrae, CA 4 of 5The Rehabilitation Center At The PalazzoPhoenix, AZ 4 of 5Villa Valencia Healthcare CenterLaguna Hills, CA 5 of 5Cottonwood Healthcare CenterWoodland, CA 5 of 5Greenridge Post AcuteEl Sobrante, CA 5 of 5Hillcrest Heights Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5La Casa Via Transitional Care CenterWalnut Creek, CA 5 of 5Oakland Heights Nursing And RehabilitationOakland, CA 5 of 5Pacific Heights Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Petaluma Post-Acute RehabilitationPetaluma, CA 5 of 5Stonebrook Health And RehabilitationLos Gatos, CA 5 of 5The Avenues Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5The Springs Healthcare Center At The CarlottaPalm Desert, CA 5 of 5University Post-Acute RehabSacramento, CA 5 of 5Woodlands Healthcare CenterLos Gatos, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AWHC,LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/14/2010
BRADSHAW, PETERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/07/2023
ELSNER, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/14/2010
KIRKWOOD, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
ORGILL, CRAIGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
PARTI, RAJESHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/14/2010
PARTI, SHRUTYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/14/2010
PAXMAN, MARCUSIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/31/2019
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCAITIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/14/2010
CASLMON, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
THOMPSON, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
GALAPON, FEDERICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/25/2024
PHAM, ABEGAILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/19/2023
ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CWHC, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2019
EAST WEST BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/14/2010
JACARANDA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/14/2020
BRADSHAW, JEFFREYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BRADY, VERNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2019
CASE, RYANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2019
CHAN, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2022
JURADO, FRANKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 32%Other / private 12%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$435per resident / day
operating cost
$13,217per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$486per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056271. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next