No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lodi Nursing & Rehabilitation

1334 S. Ham Lane, Lodi, CA 95242 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 74 certified beds · (209) 334-3825 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (209) 334-3825 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 44 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1520 W Kettleman Ln · (209) 339-3797 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1000 W Kettleman Ln · (209) 368-5112 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1230 S Fairmont Ave · (209) 334-2081 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Kofu Park0.2 mi
1145 S Ham Ln · (209) 333-6742 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1822 W Kettleman Ln Ste 2 · (209) 333-1682

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.9%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.6%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.9%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.2%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.6%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.322.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.031.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 217 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.0%CMS range 53.3–66.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.1–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 6.3–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
26.8%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 68.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-06)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection prevention and control measures for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1), when staff did not perform hand hygiene and change their gloves during a nephrostomy tube (a tube that drains urine directly from the kidney) dressing change for Resident 1 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control strategy used in nursing homes that requires use of gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities to reduce the transmission of germs and bacteria).This failure increased the risk for infection to Resident 1 and had the potential to spread infection and cause health problems for the residents in the facility.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including artificial openings of urinary tract status (surgically created route to divert urine out of the body when the normal pathway is blocked, diseased, or bypass).A review of Resident 1's TREATMENT ADMINISTRATION RECORD, dated for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage in the medication refrigerator located at Nurse Station 1 for a census of 69 residents when:1. The medication refrigerator was observed with extensive frost buildup and temperature outside the facility's required range per policy; and,2. The facility had not implemented a log or tracking system for routine cleaning and defrosting of the medication refrigerator.These failures had the potential to contribute to unsafe medication storage and use, which could affect the health and well-being of vulnerable elderly residents.Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26, at 8:35 a.m., in the facility's medication room at Nurse Station 1, accompanied by Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, the medication refrigerator used to store insulins, tuberculin tests, eye drops, and the emergency kit was observed with heavy frost buildup on the top section. Further observation indicated the refrigerator temperature was 24 degrees Fahrenheit, which was outside the facility's required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. Two water pitchers, multiple spoons, spatulas, a blender, two metal baking sheets, and plates were stored wet, 2. A bag of uncooked pasta did not have a use by date; and, 3. A lunch cart did not have a cover, and two lunch plates in the food delivery cart were not fully covered. These failures had the potential of leading to a food-borne illness (an illness that comes from eating contaminated food) for all 69 residents receiving facility prepared meals.Findings:1a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26, at 8:28 AM, with the Assistant Dietary Manager (DM), in the kitchen, two water pitchers were observed placed wet on the kitchen shelf next to the hot water dispenser machine. The DM confirmed the two water pitchers were stored wet. The DM stated the two water pitchers should have been dried completely before placing them on the kitchen shelf. The DM further stated bacteria…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection prevention and control measures for a census of 69, when:Resident 86 had perishable food at the bedside that was not consumed or discarded two days after the date,An opened and half-filled single-use skin ointment packet was left on Resident 85's overbed table after being used during incontinent care,Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6 did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE- equipment such as protective clothing, gloves, masks or other garments used to prevent or minimize exposure to hazards) when assisting Resident 93 who was on contact precautions (infection control steps used in a healthcare setting to prevent the spread of germs that are passed by direct contact with a patient or their environment),Resident 1's linens were not changed in a timely manner after blood was left exposed on the bed sheets and blankets,Resident 6's vital signs (measurements of the body's basic functions such as body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 19) was treated with dignity and respect when a clothing protector (adult bib) was applied during mealtime against the resident's wishes. This failure violated Resident 19's right to dignity with the potential to negatively impact Resident 19's psychosocial well-being. Findings:During a review of Resident 19's admission record, the record indicated Resident 19's diagnosis included major depressive disorder (a common, serious mental health condition characterized by persistent, intense feelings of sadness, and a loss of interest in activities that severely impacts daily functioning and social isolation) and anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by persistence, excessive, or dread that interferes with daily life).During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/4/26 at 8:15 a.m. with Resident 19 in Resident 19's room, Resident 19 was observed in bed in a sitting position with the meal tray placed on the overbed table. During the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of two of 23 sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 83) when,1. Resident 10'a call lights (devices used to contact staff for assistance) was not within their reach. 2. Resident 83's call light was not within reach.This failure placed Resident 10 and Resident 83 at increased risk for unmet care needs, delayed staff response, falls, and potential for accidents or injury.Findings:1.A review of Resident 10's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 10's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of left female breast (breast cancer), palliative care (care focused on comfort and quality of life), secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified lung (cancer that spread to the lung, dementia (a condition that affects memory and thinking), metabolic encephalopathy (a condition causing confusion due to a body imbalance or illness), anxiety disorder, and pain.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 11:41 AM with Resident 10 in Resident 10's room, Resident 10 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be fully informed of the Bed-Hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization) process for 1of 23 sampled residents (Residents 10) when the facility failed to provide a written Bed-Hold Notice to Resident 10 and her RP when transferred to the hospital on [DATE].This failure placed Residents 10 and her RP at risk for emotional distress (mental or emotional harm) and deprived Resident 10 and her RP of the option and information to keep the resident's bed during hospitalization (bed-hold).Findings:A review of Resident 10's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included breast cancer, lung cancer, and palliative care (care focused on comfort and quality of life), and had a resident representative (RP) listed in the admission record. A review of Resident 10's progress notes, dated 12/1/25, the progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the nursing interventions to prevent the development or worsening of pressure injuries (pressure ulcers) for one of 23 residents (Resident 48) was care planned and communicated to staff when a physician ordered repositioning every two hours for Resident 48 for pressure injury prevention on 2/12/26, and the intervention was not included in the care plan or the Kardex (a quick reference care sheet used by Certified Nursing Assistants [CNAs] to guide daily care).This failure created the potential for unmet pressure injury prevention needs for Resident 48. Findings:Review of Resident 48's admission RECORD indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including primary osteoarthritis of the left shoulder (joint damage that causes pain and stiffness), difficulty walking, muscle weakness generalized, primary osteoarthritis of the right shoulder, contracture of the right ankle (stiffness that limits movement of the joint), pressure ulcer of the left buttock stage II (a skin sore with partial skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe pharmaceutical services were provided with the accountability of delivered medications based on standards of practice for a resident census of 69 when medication delivery slips and manifests from the pharmacy provider were not consistently signed and dated by licensed staff upon receipt from delivery courier for accuracy and accountability of prescription medication received. This failure had the potential to result in drug diversion (illegal use of drugs), medication error, misuse, unaccounted-for and missing resident medications. Findings: Review of the facility documents titled CONSOLIDATED DELIVERY SHEETS, located in the pharmacy delivery receipt binder at Nurse Station 1, for the period of 2/3/26 to 3/3/26, indicated, . AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES ONLY (stamped signatures & dates are not acceptable). The review further revealed that the documents were incomplete, as they were not consistently signed and dated by licensed nursing staff as required. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/3/26, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices were followed when medication error rate was more than 5% (% or percentage- number or ratio that expressed as a fraction of 100) with the census of 69 residents. Medication administration observations were conducted over multiple days, at varied times, in random locations throughout the facility. The facility had a total of 6 errors out of 26 opportunities which resulted in a facility wide medication error rate of 23.08 % in 1 out of 9 residents (Resident 6) during medication administration observation. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe medication use, medication errors, and noncompliance with the physician's orders.Findings: Review of Resident 6's electronic medical record, titled admission RECORD, dated 3/2026, indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), convulsions or seizure disorder (refers to a temporary, sudden, involuntary muscle contractions), schizophrenia (mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to maintain and prevent decline in functional ability (the resident's ability to move and perform daily activities) for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 31) when Resident 31's physical therapy (PT: a healthcare specialty service focused on improving movement, reducing pain, and restoring physical function through tailored exercises, manual techniques, and education) was discontinued despite a physician's order to extend physical therapy and without a plan to maintain or prevent decline in functional abilities through restorative nursing assistant (RNA - a program where trained staff help residents practice exercises and daily activities to maintain strength and mobility) services.This failure placed Resident 31 at risk for functional decline and complications related to decreased mobility such as muscle atrophy (muscle becomes smaller and weaker from lack of use), pressure injuries, contractures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance Committee (a mandatory, internal group within a nursing home or skilled nursing facility. Its purpose is to identify, monitor, and improve the quality of care and life for residents, as required by federal law for facilities receiving Medicare or Medicaid funding) failed to meet quarterly with all required members, when the Administrator (ADM) and the Medical Director (MD) did not attend the scheduled quarterly meetings as required.This failure decreased the facility's potential to identify, monitor, implement and enhance the quality of care for residents for a census of 69.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/6/26, at 11:17 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the ADM, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI- a data-driven, proactive approach mandated by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] for healthcare facilities to continuously monitor, analyze, and improve the quality of care and services) binder was reviewed. The ADM confirmed that the previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a functioning call light system (system/device used by residents to call staff for assistance) was in place for 2 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 61 and Resident 62) when Resident 61 and Resident 62's call light was not working.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 61 and Resident 62 being unable to call staff for help when needed and their needs not being met.Findings:1a. A review of Resident 61's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility in the spring of 2025 with diagnoses including difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where there is not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in the body).A review of Resident 61's clinical record titled, Care Plan Report, dated [DATE], indicated .Focus: Altered bladder elimination due to incontinence related to: Mobility deficit .The interventions include: Answer light promptly.Focus: High…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN: a notice that informs residents of changes to their Medicare Part A coverage for the purpose of determining financial liability for expenses incurred for extended care items or services furnished to a beneficiary and for which Medicare does not pay) to one of one sampled resident (Resident 2) reviewed for Medicare benefit notification after skilled services ended.This failure had the potential for Resident 2 not to be able to make informed decisions about his care and finances, being unaware of his right to appeal and placed him at risk for unexpected medical bills.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/6/25, at 2:48 PM, the Admissions Coordinator (AC) stated Resident 2's Medicare Part A skilled services coverage ended on 7/23/25. The AC stated Resident 2 continued to stay in the facility after his skilled care ended. The AC confirmed that Resident 2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accident-free environment when necessary rehabilitation care instructions for nursing staff were not updated in the care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was placed in a regular wheelchair instead of a recliner wheelchair with a non-slip mat.This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling out of the wheelchair and hitting his head on the floor on 7/27/25. Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness to one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one- sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (also known as stroke, when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to brain tissue damage) affecting right dominant side, difficulty in walking, and paraplegia (inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body).A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a standardized assessment to quickly evaluate a resident's cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards and facility policy for food service when: 1. An Ice machine was not cleaned per manufacturer's guidelines and facility policy. 2. Lunch meal foods were not handled and served safely under sanitary conditions during a trayline observation. 3. Coffee machine water filter was expired for more than 1.5 years. 4. Serving ladles and scoop handles were damaged and not maintained in food safe manner. 5. A Griddle top collection tray cup had black sticky grime, brown stains and food residue inside of it. 6. Curry powder seasoning was out of date and code. 7. Parsley was found to be discolored with a tannish brown color on the leaves and stems. These failures had the potential to cause widespread foodborne illness in the 61 residents eating facility prepared meals. Cross reference F802 Findings: 1. During an interview 10/29/24 at 10:50 AM with the Maintenance Director (MTD), the MTD stated the ice machine was cleaned every three months. During an interview on 10/31/24 at 2:08 PM with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure needs were accommodated for 8 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 36, Residents 40, Resident 21, Resident 38, Resident 1, Resident 23, Resident 50, and Resident 39), when: 1. Residents 40, Resident 21, Resident 38, Resident 1, and Resident 39 call light did not work and were not provided alternative means to contact staff, and for Resident 23 and Resident 50 staff did not respond timely to calls made by Resident 23 and Resident 50 who were given and alternative means to contact staff; and 2. Resident 36's call light (device used to contact staff for assistance) was not within reach. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 36, Residents 40, Resident 21, Resident 38, Resident 1, Resident 23, Resident 50, and Resident 39 experiencing frustration and anxiety about calling for assistance, and not having needs met. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 40's admission record indicated Resident 40 was admitted with diagnoses including Ataxic Gait (uncoordinated movements when walking), Acute Respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff competently carried out the functions of the food and nutrition services department according to facility policy and standards of practice when: 1. Two Cooks and two Dietary Aides did not use proper food safety and sanitation practices to prevent cross-contamination; and 2. Weekly thermometer temperature calibrations were not completed by kitchen staff per facility policy. These failures had the potential to expose residents to bacterial contamination, that could result in food borne illnesses for all residents who consume food from the kitchen. The census was 61. Findings: 1. During a tray line observation on 10/29/24 at 12:49 PM, two cooks and two dietary aides were observed not wearing gloves and using their bare hands while plating the lunch meal food to be served. [NAME] (CK) 1 was observed placing her bare thumb on the inside of a foam container while placing a portion of meatloaf into the space of the container touched by her thumb. CK 2 was observed preparing small dessert…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at an acceptable texture and palatability (taste) for six of six residents (Resident 12, Resident 55, Resident 22, Resident 26, Reisdent 16, and Resident 25) on a pureed (to blend, chop, mash, or strain a food until it reaches this soft consistency) diet when; 1. The cook did not follow a pureed recipe as written for the preparation of dilled zucchini and carrots; and 2. Pureed food items were not of correct texture and consistency. These failures had the potential to affect meal and food intake which could impair the nutrition status for the six residents on a pureed diet. Findings: 1. During a concurrent kitchen observation and interview on 10/29/24 at 12:49 PM with [NAME] (CK) 2, a small metal pan with puree dilled carrots and zucchini vegetables were placed on a steam table. The puree carrot and zucchini mixture was noted to have a dark brownish color. [NAME] (CK) 2 stated that she put the puree vegetable mixture in the oven to keep it warm before 10:00 AM. CK 2 then used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received snack foods that met their preferences, including two unsampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 63), based on facility policy. This failure had the potential to lead to decreased food intake which could impair the resident's nutrition and health status. The facility census was 61. Cross reference F805 Findings: During a review of the facility's resident council meeting minutes from April 2024-October 2024, the meeting minutes indicated several concerns about not receiving regular snacks and nourishments. 1. During the resident council meeting on 10/30/24 at 10:27 AM with ten anonymous facility residents, the residents were asked Do you receive snacks at bedtime or when you request them? and the residents stated no, they run out of snacks, peanut butter and jelly, crackers, chocolate cookies, white bread, and dietary preferences for medical preferences are not met. The resident council attendees also stated the food here could be a lot better .we complained about meals and food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection prevention and control measures for a census of 61, when: 1. A used urinal (a container used to collect urine) in Resident 51's shared bathroom was not labeled with a resident identifier; and, 2. The shared glucometer (a device used to measure blood sugar) and blood pressure device (BP device, measures the pressure of blood pushing against the walls of arteries) were not cleaned and sanitized in-between resident care based on manufacturer's recommendation and standards of practice. These failures had the potential to spread infections to residents residing in the facility, negatively impacting their health and well-being. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/29/24 at 10:49 a.m. in Resident 51's shared bathroom (shared with Resident 27 and Resident 43), one urinal with no resident name and/or room number was observed on a metal grab bar. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/29/24 at 10:51 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in a safe, operating, and fully functioning manner, when a low-temperature dishwashing machine was not maintaining the correct wash temperature, per manufacturer specifications and facility policy. This failure had the potential to impact the ability of dietary staff to prepare and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner. The facility census was 61. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observation on 10/29/24 at 9:05 AM, the low temperature dish machine was observed during a wash cycle of dishes and the wash temperature ranged between 90-100 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on the thermometer. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 9:10 AM with Dietary Aide (DA) 1, DA 1 stated the minimum temperature for the dish machine wash cycle should be 120 degrees F. DA 1 also stated that the booster equipment attached to the dish machine that heats the water temperature up to the proper level, was not working, causing the dish machine not to reach 120 degrees F. DA 1 further stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for one of twenty-one sampled residents (Resident 10) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stood over Resident 10 while assisting him with his meals; and, 2. CNA 1 called residents feeders who needed assistance with meals. This failure resulted in Resident 10 not being provided with a respectful and dignified dining experience, which could further impact Resident 10's quality of life. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, and other pertinent information), indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment and care screening tool), the functional status section of the MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the right for privacy of one of twenty-one sampled residents (Resident 45) when Resident 45 had no privacy curtains (cloth that separates residents and provides them with privacy). This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 45's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on Fall of 2023. Resident 45's diagnoses included muscle weakness. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/29/24 at 11:13 AM Resident 45 pointed to his curtains and stated, Curtain isn't able to close all the way. Since I've been here, I have no privacy. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 11:15 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 stated she had not been aware Resident 45's curtain was missing, and stated that without the curtain she would not be able to give Resident 45 privacy if she was providing care for Resident 45. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 11:17 AM with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of twenty-one sampled residents (Resident 43) was assisted with nail care as a part of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) when staff did not trim Resident 43's long, thick, and discolored toenails. This failure had the potential for Resident 43 to sustain injury and/or to acquire an infection. Findings: Review of Resident 43's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification and past medical history), indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses which included neoplasm (abnormal mass of tissues) of bladder, encounter for palliative care ( specialized medical care that focuses on providing relief from pain and other symptoms of illness), anxiety, and heart failure. Review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/12/24, indicated Resident 43 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to one of twenty-one sampled residents (Resident 35) when physical therapy was discontinued and further services by Restorative Nursing Assistant were not provided. This failure had the potential to cause a decline in Resident 35's optimal level of function. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification and past medical history), indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses which included fracture of lower end of right femur (the bone of the thigh), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 35's care plan initiated on 8/30/23, indicated, .Focus .Self Care Deficit as evidenced by - Requiring assistance or is dependent in: Bed mobility (extensive) .toileting (extensive) .personal hygiene (extensive) .interventions .Physical therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident 27) with an indwelling catheter (foley catheter-a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder that remains there to provide continuous urinary drainage) received proper care and services consistent with professional standard of care, when Resident 27's urinary collection bag was not positioned lower than his bladder (body organ where urine is collected). This deficient practice had the potential to result in urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, and urethra) for Resident 27. Findings: Review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification and past medical history), indicated, Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses which included encounter for palliative care ( specialized medical care that focuses on providing relief from pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices for a census of 61 residents when: 1. Staff's personal belongings were stored in one of two medication storage rooms; and, 2. Loose pills were found on the floor and at the bottom of the base cabinet in the medication storage room. These failures had the potential to contribute to unsafe medication storage and diversion. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/30/24, at 2:44 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, the Station 2 medication storage room was inspected with the DON. One personal bag and an insulated water bottle were observed to be stored on the top of the base cabinet. LN 1 confirmed the personal bag and insulated bottle belonged to her. LN 1 stated the personal items should not be stored in the medication room. During an interview on 10/30/24, at 2:46 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON acknowledged staff's personal belongings were stored in Station 2 medication room. The DON stated it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a diet in the correct texture to meet the needs of an unsampled resident, (Resident 19), according to facility policy. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 19's food intake which could further impair nutrition status and lead to weight loss. The facility census was 61. Cross reference F806, CA Title 22-72337 Findings: Review of Resident 19's admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), gastro-intestinal esophageal reflux disease (GERD) (a condition in which stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into the tube connecting the mouth and stomach, called the esophagus), and constipation (difficulty having bowel movements). Review of the Minimum Data Set document indicated Resident 19 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 13, where 13-15 points indicated a person's cognition (thinking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the needs of two of twenty-one sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 36) accommodated when water pitchers were not available or empty at the bedside. These failures had the potential to result in potential health problems related to dehydration (A condition that occurs when the body loses too much water and other fluids that it needs to work normally.) for Resident 3 and Resident 36. Findings: During an observation on 10/30/24 at 11:34 AM in Resident 36's room, the water pitcher on the bedside table was empty. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/30/24 at 4:06 PM, in Resident 3's room, Resident 3 was observed sitting in her wheelchair with no water pitcher on her bedside table in front of her. Resident 3 stated that she was thirsty and wanted something to drink. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/31/24 at 2:09 PM just outside of Resident 3 and Resident 36's room, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, CNA 3 confirmed Resident 3 did not have a water pitcher and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the usual body weight of one resident (Resident 28) who experienced an unplanned 19 pound (lb)/14.8% weight loss over 9 months. This had the potential of decreased immune function, decreased muscle mass, and loss of independence. Findings: Resident 28 was readmitted to the facility winter of 2022 with diagnoses including COVID-19 (a disease caused by a virus that is contagious), anemia (blood condition lacking healthy red blood cells), and muscle weakness. Weight history included the following: 12/27/22=128 lbs. 1/23/23=121 lbs. 3/2/23=119 lbs. 4/5/23=116 lbs. 5/2/23=115 lbs. 6/4/23=113 lbs. 7/3/23=109 lbs. 8/1/23=110 lbs. 9/4/23=108 lbs. 10/1/23=109 lbs. This represented a decrease of 19 lbs./14.8% of her body weight. During an interview with Resident 28 conducted on 10/10/23 at 3:55 p.m., she reported that she did not like the facility food, stating that the food tasted off and the spices used to season it upset her stomach. Resident 28 stated that she would like to have ginger ale, fresh fruit,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%) for three out of four sampled residents (Resident 50, Resident 23, and Resident 7) when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 did not follow the physician's order in administering Resident 50's prescribed medication; 2. LN 2 administered Resident 23's prescribed medication with a wrong dosage (strength of a medication); and 3. LN 2 did not administer a prescribed medication for Resident 7 which was due as ordered. These failures resulted in three medication errors identified out of 30 opportunities during the observation of medication administration; the facility medication error rate was 10%. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/23, within the medication administration observation started at 8:28 a.m., with LN 1, LN 1 was observed preparing medications for Resident 50. LN 1 used the bottle cap of the Miralax (a medication used to treat difficulty passing stool) container to measure how much Miralax powder to administer and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and supplies were properly labeled and properly stored in accordance with manufacturer guidelines, the facility's policies and procedures, and accepted professional principles for a census of 59 when: 1. Three loose pills and a medication bag with prescription label were found on the bottom of medication cart two; 2. A used insulin medication (a medication used to treat high blood glucose) vial (a glass container used for holding liquid medicines) was found in the medication cart two without a resident label; and, 3. An expired vial of an opened insulin medication was found in medication cart two. These failures had the potential for diversion of the loose medications, risk for breach of resident's personal information, medication could be given to the wrong resident, and for residents to receive medications that were expired or with unsafe or reduced potency. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/23 at 10:36 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 of medication cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food to accommodate resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for three out of 59 residents (residents 3, 12, and 38). These failures had the potential for allergic reactions, food intolerance and weight loss for these three residents. Findings: 1. Resident 12 was admitted in the fall of 2023 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (inability to process sugar), hypertensive heart disease (high blood pressure), and vitamin D deficiency. During an interview on 10/10/23 at 3:27 p.m., Resident 12 reported that he does not tolerate bell peppers and intake will lead to an upset stomach. Resident 12 stated this intolerance had been reported to the dietary department, but he continued to receive food with bell peppers such as stir-fried vegetables (in which he counted 12 slices of bell pepper). Resident 12 further explained that he doesn't understand many of the menu item's names so was unsure when to order an alternative, and if a food contains red, green, or yellow items he would not eat it fearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was safely stored and prepared under sanitary conditions for a census of 59 when: 1. Items stored in the reach-in-refrigerator and walk-in-freezer were not properly dated; 2. The can opener tip was found chipped and with brown markings; 3. The steam table-pans were stored wet as well as the blender; 4. Uncooked bacon stored over hard cooked eggs; and, 5. [NAME] streaks were observed running down the sides of the kitchen stove, which were also rusted. The pipes behind the kitchen stove were rusted and covered in a dark fuzzy substance. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by consuming contaminated food) to residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 10/10/23 at 8:18 a.m., a jar of Maraschino cherries was dated 10/20 in the reach-in-refrigerator. An opened bag of diced ham chunks dated 10/10 with no use by date. A box of cheese & garlic biscuit dough dated 10/9, a box of 12 wheat round top bread dated 10/5, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 59 when: 1. Residents' non-pharmaceutical personal belongings were found stored in the medication carts with pharmaceutical products; 2. Resident 38's used oxygen masks and tubing (used to deliver oxygen to patients who need supplemental oxygen) and nebulizer (device used to deliver medicine to lungs) masks were not properly stored; and, 3. There was an unsanitary condition in the laundry room. These failures had the potential to spread germs and cause infection among residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/23 at 10:20 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 of medication cart 1, a resident's personal electric wrist blood pressure monitor in a white container and a 12-inch wooden handled knife with blade inserted in made-up knife sheath made of brown corrugated paper/cardboard and clear tape were found stored next to the controlled medications (medications with high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat their residents with respect and dignity for one of 20 sampled residents when (Resident 8) was not dressed in her own clothing and was left in a hospital gown. This failure had the potential to impact Resident 8's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: According to the Resident Face Sheet, Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in late 2022, with diagnosis including unspecified dementia (loss of memory, judgement, and intellectual functions), difficulty walking, muscle weakness, pain, and history of falling. Review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), dated 12/22/22, indicated that for daily preferences, it was very important for Resident 8 to choose the clothes she wanted to wear and indicated Resident 8 required extensive assistance with dressing. Review of Resident 8's care plan, dated 12/15/22, indicated, Self-Care Deficit as evidenced by requiring assistance or is dependent in: bed mobility extensive, eating supervision, transfer extensive, toileting extensive, personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) assessment was conducted for one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 57) when a discharge MDS assessment was not done for Resident 57. This failure resulted in Resident 57 to have an incomplete clinical record to reflect his condition upon discharge. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated, Resident 57 was admitted in April of 2023, with diagnoses that included high blood pressure with chronic kidney disease. A review of the Physician's Discharge summary, dated [DATE] indicated, Resident 57 was discharged to home on 6/14/23. During a concurrent interview and record review with the MDS nurse (MDSN) on 10/12/23 at 1:57 p.m., the MDSN confirmed Resident 57 was discharged on 6/14/23 and he (Resident 57) did not have an MDS discharge assessment. She stated, they (MDSN) are given 14 days to finish an assessment after discharge, it should have been completed on 6/27/23. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication needs were met for two of twenty sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 327) when: 1. Resident 3's communication care plan was not followed; and 2. Resident 327 had no care plan for her communication needs. This failure had the potential to negatively impact these resident's ability to communicate their needs to the staff. Findings: 1. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 3 was re-admitted to the facility early 2018 with diagnoses that included high blood pressure and anxiety disorder. The most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 3's preferred language was a non-English language and she needed an interpreter to communicate with a doctor and health care staff. A review of Resident 3's Risk for communication Deficit care plan initiated on 8/9/19 indicated, Goal .Resident's needs will be met through verbal and nonverbal content .Interventions .Provide communication board .assist resident to supplement words with pictures .communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided for Resident 29 and Resident 18 for a census of 59. These failures increased Resident 29 and Resident 18's risk for physical and psychosocial isolation. Findings: 1. According to the Resident Face Sheet, Resident 29 was admitted to the facility in late 2022, with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (impaired gas exchange between blood and lungs causing difficulty in breathing), abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident 29's active physician's order, dated 11/11/22, indicated, May participate in activity plan if not in conflict with treatment plan. Review of Resident 29's initial activities assessment, dated 11/25/22, indicated that Resident 29's activity preferences were reading books, newspapers, or magazines; keeping up with the news; and doing favorite activities. Review of Resident 29's active care plan, dated 3/12/23, indicated, .Listen to music he/she likes, do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 66) received necessary treatment to promote healing of her left heel wound when a treatment order was not initiated as ordered. This failure placed Resident 66 at increased risk for delayed wound healing. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 66 was re-admitted to the facility late 2023 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. Resident 66's Braden scale assessment (used to evalute the risk for pressure ulcer development) dated 8/24/23, indicated she was confined to bed, and had very limited mobility. Her Braden score was 13 out of 18 which indicated she had moderate risk of developing a pressure ulcer. A review of Resident 66's SPECIALTY PHYSICIAN INITIAL WOUND EVALUATION & MANAGEMENT SUMMARY dated 10/2/23, indicated, .Focused Wound Exam (Site 1) .UNSTAGEABLE DTI [Deep Tissue Injury, a type of pressure ulcer, localized area of discolored intact skin or blood filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate pharmaceutical services when Resident 73's full antibiotic course was not fully administered. This failure had the potential for Resident 73's infection to not be fully treated or possibly get worse. Findings: A review of Resident 73's clinical record indicated Resident 73 was admitted in mid-September, 2023 and had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/23 at 10:36 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 of medication cart 2, a bubble pack (a form of packaging where an individual pushes individually sealed tablets through the foil to take the medication) of azithromycin (an antibiotic medication used to treat certain bacterial infections) 250 milligrams (mg- unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary condition was maintained when there was pool of water and water damage in the laundry room, for a census of 59 residents. These failures increased the potential to cause major damage to the walls and ceiling and the growth of mold and bacteria. Findings: An observation of the laundry room was conducted on 10/12/23 at 07:37 a.m. with the Housekeeping staff (HS). There were white rolled towels in between the 2 washers, the side of the 2nd washer, behind the 2 washers and a pool of water behind the 2 washers. The HS confirmed the findings and she stated the Maintenance Director (MD) was aware of the leak and the pool of water. A follow-up observation of the laundry room was conducted by 4 State surveyors with the Laundry Staff (LS) on 10/12/23 at 3:24 p.m. The air vent directly above the 2 washers had blackish build up on the metal plates. The ceiling surrounding the vent was sagging and bulging with blackish discoloration on the border and the paint was peeling, bubbling and flaking. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure the safety for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), when he eloped from the facility unaccompanied and when the Licensed Nurses (LNs) failed to check and document the wanderguard (a door alarming device placed on the ankle) placement consistently every shift as per the care plan. This failure placed Resident 1's life in danger when he left the facility unaccompanied and walked over a mile on a busy street to his friend's house. Findings: According to Resident 1's 'admission Record,' he was recently admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses which included cardiomyopathy (a disease that affects the heart muscle and may lead to heart failure), difficulties walking and muscle weakness. Resident 1 scored 8 out of 15 in a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, tests memory and recall) contained in his admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool). A score of 8 indicated he had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was discharged on 9/7/23 in the morning. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Bixby Towers Post-Acute RehabLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Woodland Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 3 of 5Berkley Post-AcuteVan Nuys, CA 3 of 5Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare CenterGardena, CA 3 of 5Lake Park Healthcare CenterOakland, CA 3 of 5Marina Pointe Healthcare & SubacuteCulver City, CA 3 of 5Mission Palms Healthcare CenterWestminster, CA 3 of 5Riverwood Health CareStockton, CA 3 of 5Sierra Vista HealthcareFresno, CA 3 of 5The Gardens Healthcare CenterNorthridge, CA 3 of 5Tracy Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterTracy, CA 4 of 5Alta Healthcare Center of CamarilloCamarillo, CA 4 of 5Country Crest Post-AcuteOroville, CA 4 of 5North Park Post-AcuteTracy, CA 4 of 5San Juan Hills Healthcare CenterSan Juan Capistrano, CA 4 of 5South Marin Health & Wellness CenterGreenbrae, CA 4 of 5The Rehabilitation Center At The PalazzoPhoenix, AZ 4 of 5Villa Valencia Healthcare CenterLaguna Hills, CA 5 of 5Cottonwood Healthcare CenterWoodland, CA 5 of 5Greenridge Post AcuteEl Sobrante, CA 5 of 5Hillcrest Heights Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5La Casa Via Transitional Care CenterWalnut Creek, CA 5 of 5Oakland Heights Nursing And RehabilitationOakland, CA 5 of 5Pacific Heights Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Petaluma Post-Acute RehabilitationPetaluma, CA 5 of 5Stonebrook Health And RehabilitationLos Gatos, CA 5 of 5The Avenues Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5The Springs Healthcare Center At The CarlottaPalm Desert, CA 5 of 5University Post-Acute RehabSacramento, CA 5 of 5Woodlands Healthcare CenterLos Gatos, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ALHL, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 02/01/2016
BRADSHAW, PETERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/07/2023
ELSNER, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2016
KIRKWOOD, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
ORGILL, CRAIGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
PARTI, RAJESHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2016
PARTI, SHRUTYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2016
PAXMAN, MARCUSIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BRADY, VERNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
RAWE, COLTONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BAILEY, DOUGLASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2019
KHAN, HANEEFIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2022
SIDHU, SHIVJITINDERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
BRADSHAW, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
EAST WEST BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
SEQUOIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCAITIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2016
CASE, RYANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
JURADO, FRANKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$751K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 24%Other / private 31%

This home reported $751K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$481per resident / day
operating cost
$14,624per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$520per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555049. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next