No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Villa Valencia Healthcare Center

25000 Calle De Los Caballeros, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (949) 609-7540 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (949) 609-7540 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
24451 Health Center Dr · (949) 452-3158 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
23961 Calle de la Magdalena · (949) 380-8700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
24165 Paseo de Valencia · (949) 768-6667 · Call to confirm hours
Park
189 Avenida Majorca · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.2%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%11.2%12.0%typical

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

74.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 774 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

74.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.63U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.83hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.71hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 145 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF74.1%CMS range 70.5–77.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.5–11.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 5.0–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.21
RN hours/ resident / day
0.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.96
RN hoursweekends
45.3%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 52.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.63 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.30 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-16)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive plan of care to reflect the individual care needs for two of five sampled residents (Residents 1 and 3). * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address when Resident 1 had an actual fall on 11/26/25. * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 3's upper back abrasion. These failures had the potential risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to these residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised December 2016 showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation section showed the IDT must review and update the care plan when there has been a significant change in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the reasonable accommodations to meet the needs of one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for communication needs. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2 was provided with the means to communicate her daily needs. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's psychosocial well-being or result in delayed provision of care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Translation and/or Interpretation of Facility Services revised 5/2017 showed the following:- when encountering LEP (Limited English Proficiency) individuals, staff members will conduct the initial language assessment (e.g., I Speak Cards) and notify the staff person in charge of the language access program;- the coordinator of this facility's language access program is the Director of Social Services, or his/her designee; - all LEP persons shall receive a written notice in their primary language of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to ensure the follow-up assessment, physician notification, and documentation were completed when Resident 1 had low pulse rate and poor oral intakes. These failures posed the risk of the resident not receiving the appropriate care and delay in the provision of care to the resident.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised on 5/2017 showed the following:- the nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition;- a significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the infection control practices designed to provide the safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3). * The facility failed to ensure CNA 3 wore the appropriate PPE when providing high-contact resident care for Resident 3. This failure had the potential to transmit communicable disease to other residents throughout the facility.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled EBP dated 6/20/24, showed the following:- EBP used in conjunction with the standard precautions and expand the use of PPE to donning of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities and in situations of expected exposure to blood, body fluids, skin breakdown, or mucous membranes that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing reduce transmission;- facility staff shall post a visual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' entrapment assessments were accurate and complete for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) and one nonsampled resident (Resident A) reviewed for grab rail use. * The facility failed to ensure the entrapment assessment of the grab rails were accurately completed for Residents 2 and A. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death.Findings: According to the FDA's Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment dated 3/10/06, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Patient entrapment may result in deaths and serious injuries. These entrapment events have occurred in openings within the bed rails, between the bed rails and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the proper hand hygiene was followed during the food preparation. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of food in the refrigerator. * The facility failed to ensure the hair restraints were worn by staff in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the food item in the walk-in freezer was dated and labeled. * The facility failed to ensure the ice cream freezer was in sanitary condition. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses for the 53 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the Diet Order Tally Report dated 5/14/25, showed 53 of 54 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 2-301.14, Food employees shall clean their hands and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 7. Medical Record review of Resident 26 was initiated on 5/13/25. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 5/13/25 at 0830 hours, Resident 26's disposable gown hamper (dirty) was observed touching the PPE isolation cart. 8.a. Medical Record review of Resident 18 was initiated on 5/13/25. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 18's plan of care dated 4/21/25, showed a care plan problem addressing the resident's EBP due to GT and indwelling urinary catheter use. The interventions included to ensure proper PPE were donned before providing high contact activities. On 5/13/25 at 0830 hours, Resident 18's disposable gown hamper (dirty) was observed touching the PPE isolation cart. Resident 18 was observed with a GT and an indwelling urinary catheter hanging on the right side of the bed frame. On 5/13/25 at 0945 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with RN 2 for Residents 18 and 26. Residents 18 and 26's disposable gown hampers were observed touching…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2.a. On 5/13/25 at 1056 hours, an inspection of the facility's medication refrigerator was conducted with the DSD. The freezer compartment located inside this medication refrigerator was observed to have ice buildup. Some of the ice buildup was starting to melt and water drops were observed falling down onto the medication packages and medication bags stored directly below the freezer compartment. These findings were verified with the DSD. The DSD stated the nurses were responsible for doing a follow-up to defrost the refrigerators. Review of the temperature log showed LVN 4 last checked the medication refrigerator. On 5/20/25 at 1514 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with LVN 4. LVN 4 stated she did not remember when the medication refrigerator was last defrosted. When asked if any documentation was kept related to the last time the refrigerator was defrosted, LVN 4 stated there was no documentation kept related to defrosting the refrigerators. b. On 5/13/25, at 1111 hours, a central supply inspection was conducted with Central Supply 1. Inside the Central Supply Storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the reasonable accommodations to meet the needs of three nonsampled residents (Residents 16, 46, and 346). The facility failed to ensure Residents 16, 46, and 346's call lights were within the residents' reach. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' psychosocial well-being or result in a delay in receiving care. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Call Light Answering revised 1/2025 showed it is the policy to provide the resident a means of communication with the nursing staff, to leave the resident comfortable and to place the call device within the resident's reach before leaving the room. On 5/13/25 at 1224 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 346. Resident 346 was observed awake, lying in bed in her room. Resident 346 stated during the graveyard shift (2300 to 0700 hours), he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for one nonsampled resident (Resident 30). * Resident 30 had a physician's orders to administer Synthroid (man-made thyroid hormone) and Ajovy (used to prevent migraines in adults) medications from the acute care hospital. However, these orders were omitted during the admission process to the facility. This failure posed the risk of the resident not being able to take the prescribed medications and could potentially cause adverse effects to Resident 30 due to missing the prescribed medications. Findings: According to GoodRx.com's article titled Thyroid Hormone Medication dated 2/11/25, showed the thyroid hormone medications provide thyroid hormone when the body does not have enough such as in hypothyroidism. Thyroid hormones play an important role in growth and development. It also regulates your metabolism and body temperature. Levothyroxine is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Medical record review for Resident 344 was initiated on 5/13/25. Resident 344 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 344's Order Summary Report showed the following physician's orders dated 5/3/25: - To check the right upper arm midline site every shift; - To perform dressing change of PICC line site every day shift every seven days and record external catheter measurement in every dressing change; and - To perform dressing change of PICC line site as needed and record external catheter measurement in every dressing change Review of Resident 344's plan of care showed the following: - A care plan problem dated 5/5/25, to address Resident 344's IV therapy related to poor oral intake and high risk for infection on the right upper arm midline IV site. The interventions included observing IV site for redness, tenderness, swelling, puffiness, infiltration, and occlusion. Review of Resident 344's IV record for May 2025 showed the dressing change and external catheter measurement of PICC line site…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Medical Record review for Resident 26 was initiated on 5/13/25. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 5/13/25 at 0830 hours, Resident 26 was observed to have a nebulizer mask and tubing stored inside the bedside table drawer, touching the base of the drawer, and not bagged. Resident 26 stated she received a breathing treatment via nebulizer two times a day. On 5/13/25 at 0945 hours, an observation for Resident 26 and concurrent interview was conducted with RN 2. Resident 26's nebulizer tubing and mask were found to be unbagged and undated. RN 2 stated the nebulizer should be properly bagged and dated. RN 2 verified the findings. Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care services for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 26 and 344) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 21) reviewed for respiratory care services * The facility failed to ensure Resident 21's CPAP mask was stored properly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the competency of one of two licensed nurses (LVN 2) observed in performing a calibration of a medical equipment . LVN 2 was unable to demonstrate competency in the calibration of a glucometer. This failure had the potential of not providing care to the residents in a safe and competent manner. Findings: Review of the glucometer manufacturer's information sheet titled Assure Platinum Blood Glucose Monitoring System Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Reference Manual (undated) under the Quality Checks section showed the following: - To perform a control solution test, before testing with the Assure Platinum System for the first time, when a new bottle of test strips was opened, whenever meter or test strips may not be functioning properly, if the test test results appear to be abnormally high or low, or are not consistent, when the test strip bottle has been left open or exposed to temperatures below 39 degrees F or above 86 degrees F, or humidity levels above 8%, to check technique, when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and professional standards literature review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 5) was free of significant medication errors as evidenced by: * RN 4 administered Resident 5's ciprofloxacin (antibiotic) eye drop into the wrong eye. This failure had the potential for poor health outcome for this resident. Findings: According to Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing textbook, when preparing eye medications for the residents, the MAR is checked to verify which eye is to be treated. On 5/14/25 at 0845 hours, a medication pass observation for Resident 5 was conducted with RN 4. RN 4 was observed preparing medications for Resident 5. The medications prepared included ciprofloxacin 0.3% (antibiotic)eye drop solution. The label on Resident 5's ciprofloxacin showed the eye drop was to be administered to Resident 5's left eye for Resident 5's left eye infection. RN 4 was then observed administering an eye drop to Resident 5's right eye. During the concurrent observation and review of Resident 5's May…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Storage in the Facility, ID 1: Storage of Medication dated 4/2008 showed medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized. The provider pharmacy dispenses medications in containers that meet legal requirements, including standards set forth by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Medications are kept in these containers. Transfer of medication from one container to another is done only by pharmacy. Medical record review for Resident 31 was initiated on 5/13/25. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 31's Order Summary Report dated 4/30/25, showed the physician's orders dated 4/2/25, to administer the following medications: - Mithochondria nutrition PQQ one capsule oral two times a day for supplement - Neuroprotext Px…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to conduct a regular bed inspection as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 17 and 344). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death. Findings: 1. According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Patient entrapments may result in deaths and serious injuries. These entrapment events have occurred in openings within the bed rails, between the bed rails and mattresses, under bed rails, between split rails, and between the bed rails and head or foot boards. The population most vulnerable to entrapment are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent the presence of flies in the kitchen. This failure had the potential to lead to food borne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites or toxins) for the facility residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the Diet Order Tally Report dated 5/14/25, showed 53 of 54 residents consumed food prepared in the kitchen. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, 6-501.111, Controlling Pests, insects and other pests are capable of transmitting disease to humans by contaminating food and food-contact surfaces. Effective measures must be taken to eliminate their presence in food establishments. Review of the facility's P&P titled Pest Control revised 5/2008 showed the facility maintains an ongoing pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Review of the facility's document titled Orkin Service Report dated 4/1/25, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the use of hair and beard restraints was implemented by the dietary staff member working in the kitchen. This failure posed the risk to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared from the kitchen. Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 2-402 Hair Restraints, food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, and linens; and unwrapped single service and single use articles. Review of the facility's P&P titled Dress Code for Women and Men dated 2018 showed the kitchen staff must wear a hair covering in the kitchen. The P&P also showed the kitchen staff member with beards and mustaches (any facial hair) must wear beard restraint. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to submit a level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) for a resident that resided in the facility greater than 30 days for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #107) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR services. Findings included: A facility policy titled, admission Criteria, revised 03/2019, revealed, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. a. The facility conducts a Level I PASARR screen for all potential admissions, regardless of payer source to determine if the individual meets the criteria for a MD, ID, or RD. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #3 on 05/05/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was monitored for psychotropic medication use and an order for a PRN (pro re nata, as needed) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days for 1 (Resident #102) of 5 sampled resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 07/2022, revealed, a. PRN orders for psychotropics medications are limited to 14 days. The policy specified, 13. Residents receiving psychotropic medications are monitored for adverse consequences, including: a. anticholinergic effects-flushing, blurred vision, dry mouth, altered mental status, difficulty urinating, falls, excessive sedation and constipation: b. cardiovascular effects-irregular heart rate or pulse, palpitations, lightheadedness, shortness of breath, diaphoresis, chest/arm pain, increased blood pressure, orthostatic hypotension: c. metabolic effects- increased cholesterol and triglycerides, poorly controlled or unstable blood sugar, weight gain: d. neurologic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to conduct the status post change of condition assessments for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1 had a change of condition involving an episode of hypotension (low blood pressure) of 77/49 mmHg. The facility failed to follow up with the physician regarding the change of condition and failed to conduct an assessment related to the resident's change of condition prior Resident 1's emergent transfer to the acute care hospital. These failures posed the risk for changes in Resident 1's medical condition not being identified, potentially delaying necessary care and treatment, which posed the risk for negative health outcomes to the resident. Findings: Review of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's health topic titled Low Blood Pressure dated 2022 showed low blood pressure occurs when blood flows through your blood vessels at lower than normal pressures. For most adults, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Intakes: CA00862761 Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of two sampled residents (Residents 1) to maintain their highest physical well-being. * The facility failed to follow the physician's order to arrangefor cardiology and neurology consults for Resident 1. * Resident 1 was on multiple diuretic medications for CHF resulting in severe weight loss. The facility failed to notify the physician and ensure the interventions to manage Resident 1's significant weight loss in a timely manner. These failures had the potential to not provide the necessary care and services to meet the care needs for Resident 1. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Weight Monitoring and Management revised 1/2019 showed the resident who weighs less than 100 pounds and with identified weight change of three pounds in a week, or any resident who weighs 100 pounds or more and with weight change of five pounds in a week will be evaluated by the Weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-10 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified individual was responsible to oversee the day-to-day food service operations when: * The food service supervisor did not possess the qualifications necessary to oversee the day-to-day food service operations, and * The RD did not provide oversight of the food service operations. These failures had the potential for risk of food borne illness and compromising nutritional status in all 48 residents that received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of residents completed by the facility dated 11/9/22, showed 48 of 48 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. On 11/8/22 at 0928 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSS. The DSS stated he had been employed by the facility for one year and was currently in school to become a Dietary Services Supervisor. The DSS further stated the RD was employed full time. On 11/8/22 at 1143 hours, an interview was conducted with the RD. The RD stated she was a part…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility P&P, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by the following: * The facility failed to ensure the mechanically altered chicken prepared for the lunch meal service was served with an internal food temperature of equal to or more than 165 degrees Fahrenheit . * The facility failed to ensure the TCS (time/temperature control for safety foods - foods that require time and temperature controls to limit the growth of illness causing bacteria) were not cooled properly. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff wore gloves when handling the residents' food. * The facility failed to ensure the thawing of frozen foods in the main kitchen walk-in refrigerator were covered, labeled, and dated. * The facility failed to ensure the proper storage procedures for frozen foods in the main kitchen walk-in freezer were followed. * The facility failed to ensure the expired foods were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to treat one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 258) with dignity and respect when her wish to not be touched by a male staff was not followed. This failure had the potential to result in emotional distress to the resident. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 258 was initiated on 11/8/22. Resident 258 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 11/8/22 at 0920 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 258. Resident 258 stated in the evening of her admission to the facility, a male staff entered her room and tried to touch her. However, she told the male staff to not touch her. The male staff insisted on touching her because it was his job. On 11/20/22 at 1413 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated he was assigned to Resident 258 when the resident was admitted to the facility. CNA 1 stated he went in the room to reposition Resident 258; however, she started screaming and stated she did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to determine whether the residents wished to formulate the advance directives and failed to obtain and maintain a copy of the advance directives for three of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 7, Resident 45, & Resident 56). * The facility failed to determine whether Residents 7 and 56 wished to formulate the advance directives. * The facility failed to obtain a copy of the advance directives for inclusion in the medical record for Resident 45. These failures had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding the health care and treatment options not being honored. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives revised 11/10/22, showed upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. If the resident is incapacitated and unable to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order for oxygen treatment for one of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 7) included the dose of oxygen to be administered to the resident as per the facility's P&P. This failure posed the risk for Resident 7 to experience respiratory complications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medications Orders dated January 2022 under the section Policy Interpretation and Implementation, Elements of the Medication Order showed the medication orders should specify the name of medication; and dose and dosage form On 11/8/22 at 0928 hours, Resident 7 was observed receiving 2.5 liters per minute of oxygen. Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 11/8/22. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 7's Order Audit Report showed a physician's order dated 9/17/22, to administer oxygen for supplementation to keep oxygen saturation above 92% call physician if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-10 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one of four cooks (Cook 1) had the appropriate skill set to safely perform the daily operations of the Food Service Department as evidenced by: * [NAME] 1 failed to wear gloves when handling food in the kitchen. * [NAME] 1 failed to ensure the utensils used during the food preparation were air dried prior to them being used. These failures had the potential for unsafe food practices which may lead to food borne illness in a highly susceptible population of 46 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 completed by the facility dated 11/9/22, showed 46 of 46 residents residing in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Preventing Foodborne Illnesses - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices dated October 2017, under the policy interpretation and implementation section showed the contact between food and bare (ungloved) hands is prohibited. During the initial tour of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document and P&P review, the facility failed to ensure a menu system approved by the RD was implemented when: 1. The diet spreadsheet (a document which referenced portion sizes and therapeutic diet extensions) and a corresponding nutritional analysis (a breakdown of macro and micronutrients provided by the diet) were not implemented and had not been reviewed and approved by the RD. 2. Puree recipes were not developed and followed for the current menu being used. These failures posed the risk of resident nutritional needs not being met which in turn could lead to compromised nutritional status including weight loss, skin breakdown and dehydration. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 form completed by the facility dated 11/9/22, showed 48 of 48 residents residing in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's P&P undated titled Menu and Portion Adherence showed All portion sizes, (scoop size), should strictly match the menu spread sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food preference was followed for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 38). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's weekly menu titled SNC Week 2 (11/7/22 to 11/13/22) showed on 11/8/22, residents were served pulled pork sandwich. On 11/8/22 at 1210 hours, an observation of lunch service was conducted. Resident 38 was served her lunch tray which consisted of a pulled pork sandwich. Resident 38 started eating the pulled pork sandwich. Review of Resident 38's lunch meal ticket dated 11/8/22, showed Resident 38 disliked pork. On 11/8/22 at 1212 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the DSD. When asked what Resident 38 was eating, the DSD confirmed Resident 38 was served a pulled pork sandwich. However, the DSD verified Resident 38's meal ticket dated 11/8/22 showed Resident 38 disliked pork. The DSD acknowledged Resident 38 should not be served a pulled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-10 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the policy regarding outside food brought for residents by the family or visitors was followed. This failure posed the risk for potential unsafe food handling practices. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors revised on October 2017 showed in part, .all personnel involved in preparing, handling, serving, or assisting the resident with meals or snacks will be trained in safe food handling practices .7b. Containers will be labeled with the resident's name. the item, and the use by date. Further review of the policy showed no documentation regarding how long the food should be kept in the refrigerator. On 11/10/22 at 0852 hours, an interview was conducted with LVN 3. LVN 3 stated the food items brought into the facility for a resident had to be checked first to ensure it was compatible with the resident's diet. LVN 3 stated the residents' food items were to be stored in a refrigerator located in the Dining Room and should be kept for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for one of five sampled residents (Resident 3). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3's change in condition documentation was accurate. This failure had the potential for the resident's health care needs not met as the medical record was inaccurate.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised July 2017 showed all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation section showed documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans were developed to reflect the individual care needs for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for care plans. * The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for the use of the anticoagulant medication ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for the resident to not be provided with appropriate, consistent, and individualized care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans revised 12/2016 showed the following:- A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; and - The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's garbage and refuse was properly disposed. This failure had the potential to cause unsafe sanitary conditions and potential to harbor pests and rodents. Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles: Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnable shall be kept covered. (B) With tight-fitting or doors if kept outside the food establishment. Review of the facility's P&P titled Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal revised 10/2017 showed the outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of the surrounding litter. On 5/14/25 at 0745 hours, an observation of the facility's outside dumpster located on the side of the facility was conducted. One of one dumpster was observed overflowing with trash, preventing the lid from fully closing. On 5/14/25 at 0804 hours, an observation and interview was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor. The Maintenance Supervisor stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship program. * The facility failed to ensure the McGeer criteria (criteria used by long-term care facilities to determine a true infection) for true infection was completed and accurate for one nonsampled residents (Resident 597) . This failure had the potential for inaccurately identifying the true infections and potentially inhibiting the residents from receiving the appropriate treatment and care. Findings: According to the CDC, antibiotics are some of the most commonly prescribed medications in nursing homes. Over the course of a year, up to 70% of nursing home residents get an antibiotic. Roughly 40% to 75% of antibiotics are prescribed incorrectly. In nursing homes, high rates of antibiotics are prescribed to prevent UTI and RTI. Prescribing antibiotics before there is an infection often contributes to misuse. Often residents are given antibiotics just because they are colonized with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facilityP&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was accurate and complete. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's admission to the facility, refusal of care, and discharge information was accurately and/or completely documented. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the appropriate care and can negatively impact her overall health and wellbeing. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled admission Assessment and Follow-up: Role of the Nurse revised 9/2012 showed the purpose of this procedure is to gather information about the resident's physical, emotional, cognitive, and psychosocial condition upon admission for the purpose of managing the resident, initiating the care plan, and completing required assessment instrument, including the MDS. The section for Documentation showed the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to document the interviewed staff during their abused investigation process as per their P&P for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident as the information was not complete. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse Reporting and Investigation revised 12/2022 showed to thoroughly investigate the reports of all the allegations of abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or injuries of an unknown source when appropriate. The Administrator shall conduct the investigation and interview individuals who may have information relevant to the allegation including but not limited to: interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged night. Witness report(s) or statement(s) shall be obtained in writing; both interviewer and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-05 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) or their RP was informed of a new medication ordered by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 or Resident 1's RP was notified of a new physician's order for Levaquin (antibiotic medication). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 and their responsible party to not be informed of the medications and their potential side effects. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised May 2017 showed the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when there is a change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. Regardless of the resident's current mental or physical condition, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician was promptly notified of the resident's unwitnessed fall for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) as per the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate care for the Resident 1. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Falls Management Program revised 1/2019 showed a definition of a fall included: - When a resident, family member or staff member said a fall occurred. - When a person was found on the floor, regardless of whether any injury resulted. - An occasion on which residents lowered themselves to the floor. -When the resident had to be lowered to the floor by a staff member to prevent a fall. The P&P further showed the licensed nurse will notify the resident's attending physician and responsible party of the fall incident and the resident's status. Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to maintain the accurate medical record for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). * The physician's order for megestrol was duplicate and documented given twice to Resident 1. * The facility failed to document the wound treatment in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) on 2/28/23. Thes failures had the potential for the resident's care needs not being met as their medical information was inaccurate. Findings: Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 8/23/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a Stage 3 coccyx pressure injury. a. Review of Resident 1's physician's order dated 2/22/23 at 1421 hours, showed to administer megestrol acetate suspension 400 mg/10 ml, 10 ml by mouth one time a day for appetite stimulant for four weeks. Review ofResident 1's physician's order dated 2/22/23 at 1647 hours, showed to administer megestrol acetate suspension 400 mg/10 ml, 10 ml by mouth one time a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-11-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to provide adequate information regarding a staff member who was tested positive for COVID-19 to the local county public health agency. This failure had the potential for inaccurate surveillance which could result in the spread of infection to the residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's list of employees who were tested positive for COVID-19 from 8/20/22 to 11/10/22, showed two facility staff members were tested positive for COVID-19 between 8/10/22 to 11/10/22, one of 8/22/22 and one on 10/18/22. However, there was no documented evidence the facility had reported one of the two positive COVID-19 cases to the local county public health agency, OCHCA. On 11/9/22 at 1210 hours, an interview and concurrent facility document review was conducted with the IP. When asked, the IP verified they did not provide OCHCA with the name of the staff member who was tested positive for COVID-19 on 8/22/22 and complete the required spreadsheet by OCHCA. The IP further stated the facility should have reported it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-11-10 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — pattern
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the residents and/or their representatives were informed of the facility's COVID-19 cases. This failure posed the risk for the residents and their families not aware of the positive COVID-19 cases or exposures in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's list of positive COVID-19 Residents from 8/20/22 to 11/10/22, showed the following positive COVID-19 residents and staff on the following dates: -Resident 600 on 8/20/22; -Resident 601 on 8/21/22; -Resident 602 on 8/21/22; -Resident 603 on 8/22/22; and, -One staff member on 10/18/22. The facility failed to show documented evidence the residents and/or their representative were informed of the above positive COVID-19 cases. On 11/9/22 at 1210 hours, an interview and concurrent facility document review was conducted with the IP. The IP verified the above information. The IP stated the facility used an application called Clinic Connect to send automated messages to notify the residents and their family regarding positive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Bixby Towers Post-Acute RehabLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Woodland Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 3 of 5Berkley Post-AcuteVan Nuys, CA 3 of 5Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare CenterGardena, CA 3 of 5Lake Park Healthcare CenterOakland, CA 3 of 5Marina Pointe Healthcare & SubacuteCulver City, CA 3 of 5Mission Palms Healthcare CenterWestminster, CA 3 of 5Riverwood Health CareStockton, CA 3 of 5Sierra Vista HealthcareFresno, CA 3 of 5The Gardens Healthcare CenterNorthridge, CA 3 of 5Tracy Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterTracy, CA 4 of 5Alta Healthcare Center of CamarilloCamarillo, CA 4 of 5Country Crest Post-AcuteOroville, CA 4 of 5Lodi Nursing & RehabilitationLodi, CA 4 of 5North Park Post-AcuteTracy, CA 4 of 5San Juan Hills Healthcare CenterSan Juan Capistrano, CA 4 of 5South Marin Health & Wellness CenterGreenbrae, CA 4 of 5The Rehabilitation Center At The PalazzoPhoenix, AZ 5 of 5Cottonwood Healthcare CenterWoodland, CA 5 of 5Greenridge Post AcuteEl Sobrante, CA 5 of 5Hillcrest Heights Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5La Casa Via Transitional Care CenterWalnut Creek, CA 5 of 5Oakland Heights Nursing And RehabilitationOakland, CA 5 of 5Pacific Heights Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Petaluma Post-Acute RehabilitationPetaluma, CA 5 of 5Stonebrook Health And RehabilitationLos Gatos, CA 5 of 5The Avenues Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5The Springs Healthcare Center At The CarlottaPalm Desert, CA 5 of 5University Post-Acute RehabSacramento, CA 5 of 5Woodlands Healthcare CenterLos Gatos, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ALHV LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/06/2020
ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/06/2020
JACARANDA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BRADSHAW, JEFFREYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BRADSHAW, PETERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/07/2023
BRADY, VERNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CASE, RYANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ELSNER, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/06/2020
KIRKWOOD, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/06/2020
ORGILL, CRAIGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/06/2020
PARTI, RAJESHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/06/2020
PARTI, SHRUTYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/06/2020
PAXMAN, MARCUSIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CASLMON, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
THOMPSON, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
NORDFELT, SPENCERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2022
TRAN, ROGERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2017
VILLAHERMOSA-CALUMPANG, CRISTINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2021
ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
EAST WEST BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/06/2020
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/06/2020
WELLS FARGO & COOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/06/2020
JURADO, FRANKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$840K
Related-party expense7% of expenses

This home reported $840K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$688per resident / day
operating cost
$20,916per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$781per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555462. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next