Lake Park Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 31.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.87 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and records review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 18 out of 18 sample selected residents (Resident 234, 22, 30, 8, 237, 236, 10, 235, 21, 27, 17, 134, 137, 11, 135, 136, 31 and 138) who were residing at the facility and receiving food from the facility's kitchen when: 1. Facility did not ensure food temperatures were checked before serving to all 18 residents (IJ). 2. Multiple Dietary staff did not wear hair nets and beard nets while working in the kitchen. 3. A Dietary staff did not wash hands upon entering the kitchen. 4. 24 plated foods were stored in the refrigerator without covers and three of three-gallon tub ice creams with no lids were stored in the freezer. 5. Ice Cream freezer had frost around the rim and inside the freezer. 6. Multiple items in the walk-in freezer were undated and unlabeled. 7. [NAME] used water instead of nutrient fluids for making pureed food. These failures had the potential to result in the outbreak of foodborne…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents' hospital discharge orders were verified with admitting physician upon Resident 1's admission to the facility in accordance with professional standard of practice when Resident 1's admission order was not clarified and transcribed accurately and Resident 1 did not received medications as ordered.This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving medications as ordered by the physician for three days and Resident 1's transfer to the hospital for syncope (fainting or passing out). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 2/13/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with multiple diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) and essential hypertension (high blood pressure).During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 1/30/26, PN indicated Resident 1's responsible party (RP) met with Director of Nursing (DON) and expressed concerns regarding missing medications on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure lunch menu was followed for 29 of 32 residents when:1. Kitchen served cheesecake instead of apple pie as posted on the menu.2. Registered Dietitian (RD) was not made aware of menu substitution in a timely manner.This failure resulted in 29 residents receiving dessert substitution during lunch, on 1/14/26, without the approval of the RD. A review of the posted undated weekly menu titled Fall/Winter 2025-2026, Week 3 indicated for Wednesday, Lunch included black bean soup, mixed green salad, turkey and Swiss sandwich, pasta salad, lettuce, tomato, and pickle, apple pie, 2% milk, hot tea, and coffee. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/14/26, at 11:45 a.m., in the Dining/Activity Room, both residents, Resident 2 and Resident 3, ate lunch without assistance. Resident 3 stated the dessert was lemon cheesecake. During an interview and record review on 1/14/26, at 12:18 p.m., in the hallway next to the Dining/Activity Room, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), there were two undated weekly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure dietary needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) were updated and care planned. Registered Dietitian (RD) and Dietary staff were made aware of Resident 1's food preference and requested copy of weekly menu and this information was not addressed in a timely manner. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to lose weight due to decreased consumption and/or anger/depression when resident's dietary requests were not met. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 1/14/26, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included status post (s/p) joint replacement surgery, Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM, high blood sugar), and depression. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to provide care), dated 12/27/26, indicated Resident 1 had Intact cognition, was understood and was able to understand others. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, active orders as of 1/14/26, diet order start date 12/25/25, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly secure medications and sharp instruments when one treatment cart was left unlocked and unsupervised, in an area where residents could access it. This failure had the potential for accidental medication administration, ingestion or injury to residents residing in the facility. During an observation on 11/05/24, at 7:46 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) in the hallway, a treatment cart containing topical medications, ointments, scissors, nail clippers, and other treatment supplies was observed unlocked. The treatment cart was situated in between six resident bedrooms and the activity/dining room, and multiple residents passed the treatment cart during this time. The cart remained unlocked while LVN 1 went in four separate resident bedrooms to administer medications, until 11:30 a.m. In an interview on 11/5/24, at 11:30 a.m., with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated the treatment cart contained prescribed medications. During an interview on 11/5/24, at 2:07 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under safe and sanitary conditions when: 1. Dry food items were stored less than 6 inches above the floor. 2. Refrigerated and frozen food items were unlabeled, and undated. 3. Dry food items were past their use by date. 3. Raw pork was stored directly over ready to eat shrimp. 4. There was dark brownish matter inside the resident ice machine, above the ice bin. These failures had the potential to put residents at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria or other microorganisms from one substance to another) that could have resulted in infection or spread of infection. Findings: During an observation on 11/04/24, at 9:40 a.m., the kitchen refrigerator had an opened container of raw pork directly above and an opened container of ready to eat shrimp. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24, at 10:13 a.m., with Registered Dietician (RD), the kitchen and food storage were observed. The dry storage had three bulk boxes of cereal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practice when reusable resident-care equipment was not cleaned/disinfected in between residents. This failure had the potential to cause resident infection via cross-contamination. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/5/24, at 7:46 a.m., in the resident bedroom hallway with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), LVN 1 took the blood pressure machine out of the drawer, did not sanitize the cuff and stated it was the first blood pressure she took that day. LVN 1 obtained resident 84's blood pressure reading, laid the blood pressure machine/cuff on the cart, prepared Resident 84's medications, and administered them. LVN 1 then obtained Resident 19's blood pressure (taken earlier by the Certified Nursing Assistant), then prepared and administered Resident 19's medications. LVN 1 then picked up the blood pressure machine/cuff and obtained Resident 11's (a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions [infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for three of 22 sampled residents (Resident 30, Resident 234, and Resident 11). This failure resulted in Resident 30, Resident 234, and Resident 11's missed scheduled showers and a potential to cause low self-esteem and embarrassment to the residents. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 30's admission Record, dated 10/25/23, indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a condition in which brain function is disturbed), prostate cancer, and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 30's clinical record titled, Brief Interview for Mental Status (3.0 BIMS - a brief screener that aides in detecting cognitive impairment), dated 10/9/23, indicated a score of 9 (moderately intact). A review of Resident 30's clinical record titled, Plan of Care (POC) Response History, subtitled, Task: SELF CARE: Shower/Bathe Self and mobility:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. maintain an accurate accountability sheet that documented the number of controlled substances (Diazepam tablets) that should be available for destruction and 2. provide pharmaceutical services including the provision of routine medications to meet the needs of one of seven (Resident 19) sampled Residents. These failures had the potential to cause diversion of controlled medication (illegal use of medication not intended by the provider) and adverse health outcomes related to incorrect medication administration. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 19's Controlled Drug Record indicated that Resident 19 was discharged from the facility on 10/10/23 with sixteen tablets of diazepam (controlled medication for treatment of anxiety) 5 mg tablets. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/24/23, at 2:32 pm, with the DON (Director of Nursing), in the DON's office, it was observed there were additional diazepam tablets for Resident 19 stored in her office cabinet for destruction. The DON counted a total of 30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than 5% for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 234) when the medication error rate was 16/67%. This failure had the potential for adverse health outcomes related to incorrect medication administration. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/23/23, at 10:06 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) administered a Multi-vitamin with Mineral Tablet, Aspirin (reduces pain, swelling and inflammation) 81 mg chewable tablet to Resident 22, but did not administer Solifenacin Succinate (used to treat bladder problems) Oral Tablet 5 mg to Resident 22. During a record review of Resident 22's Order Summary Report, dated 10/23/23, the Order Summary Report indicated, Multivitamin & Mineral Oral Liquid (1 ml by mouth one time a day), Solifenacin Succinate Oral Tablet (5 mg by mouth one time a day), and [NAME] Aspirin Oral Tablet (no strength in mg noted, 1 tablet by mouth one time a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide resident care) was completed within the required timeframes for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 21). Resident 21's annual MDS was not completed within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD, a date set to establish a uniform look-back period for all the responses to MDS coding items). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 21 not receiving the appropriate care and services needed based on the resident's current health status. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission Record, printed 10/26/23, indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure). During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/26/23, at 10:06 a.m., with the MDS Coordinator, Resident 21's MDS Assessments were reviewed. The MDS Coordinator stated a comprehensive MDS should have been completed and submitted no later than 14 days from the ARD. MDS Coordinator stated Resident 21 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,996 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $4,963 — penalty dated 2023-10-26
• $13,033 — penalty dated 2023-10-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $160K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA