No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Tracy Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

545 West Beverly Place, Tracy, CA 95376 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 62 certified beds · (209) 835-6034 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (209) 835-6034 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Dec 20251 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
457 W Eaton Ave · (209) 833-0886 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1420 N. Tracy Blvd., Second Floor · (209) 832-6004 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2005 N Tracy Blvd · (209) 835-8172 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Lincoln Park, 2 E Eaton Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.9%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.2%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.9%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.7%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.622.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.841.571.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 274 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 130 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.0%CMS range 60.1–71.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 9.2–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.9–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.92
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
51.2%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 57.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.84 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-05)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide required supervision for one of three sampled residents, Resident 1, who was dependent on staff for toileting and was left unattended while using the toilet. This failure resulted in Resident 1 attempting to get off the toilet independently without staff supervision which led to a fall and a head injury that resulted in Resident 1's hospitalization on [DATE] and death on [DATE]. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, admission Record, (a document that contains the resident's personal information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history that included weakness to the right side of the body following cerebrovascular disease (also called cerebrovascular accident or stroke-damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) difficulty walking, and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). A review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan (written plan that guides staff on daily care and safety based on the resident's needs) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to address Resident 1's refusals of care, treatment, and participation in a care conference (a meeting to discuss the resident's plan of care), which prevented Resident 1 from receiving appropriate care, treatment, and care planning. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for worsening of underlying conditions, overall health decline, and preventable complications. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included chronic kidney disease stage 3 B (kidneys are moderately to severely damaged and are not working well to filter waste from the blood), asthma (long-term breathing condition that makes it hard to breathe due to narrowed airways), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (weakness or paralysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection prevention and control measures for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when two staff members did not perform hand hygiene (cleaning hands with soap and water or alcohol-based hand sanitizer to remove germs and prevent the spread of infection) before and after entering and exiting Resident 2's room to perform care tasks for Resident 2, who was under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection-control strategy used in nursing homes to help stop the spread of hard-to-treat infection by requiring extra safety steps, such as wearing gowns and gloves during close care).This failure had the potential to spread infection and cause health problems for the residents in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (infection of the bladder or urinary system), unspecified Escherichia Coli as the cause of diseases (type of bacteria that can cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when:1. Items past their use by dates and spoiled food items were stored in the dry storage pantry,2. There was no air gap or back flow prevention device installed for the food prep sink or the three compartment sink (a commercial kitchen essential with three basins for washing, rinsing, and sanitizing dishes),3. The dishwasher chlorine level was below the proper level for sanitizing dishes, and4. Dietary staff (DS) 1 and DS 2 did not perform appropriate hand hygiene while working in the kitchen.These failures had the potential to affect the flavor and palatability of the food and to lead to food borne illness (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) for the 51 residents receiving facility prepared food.Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 8:36 AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) in the dry storage area of the kitchen, the FSD confirmed the following items were on the shelves and available for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive water safety management program based on nationally accepted standards to minimize the risk of Legionella (bacteria spreads via inhaling contaminated water and can lead to a serious lung infection) and other waterborne pathogens (a microorganism [bacteria] that exists in water sources or plumbing [pipes required for the water supply, heating and sanitation in a building] systems that can cause serious illness in people over [AGE] years of age and those with weakened immune systems) for a census of 52 residents when:a. The facility did not complete and document a facility wide assessment of potential Legionella growth areas to include flow charts;b. The facility did not implement adequate control measures;c. The facility did not establish sufficient monitoring protocols;d. The facility did not create an intervention plan for when control limits are not met.These failures put the residents and at risk of potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure four (4) of 20 sampled residents' (Resident 3, Resident 9, Resident 42, and Resident 53) basic grooming needs were met when:Resident 3's fingernails nails were long, jagged, and unclean;Resident 9's fingernails nails were long, jagged, and unclean;Resident 42's fingernails nails were long, jagged, unclean and Resident 42 had an odor coming from her clenched right hand;Resident 53's fingernails nails were long, jagged, and unclean. These failures had the potential for Resident 3, Resident 9, Resident 42, and Resident 53 to sustain injury and/or acquire an infection.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 3's admission RECORD, the record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2019, with a diagnosis which included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that affects the parts of the brain that control thought, memory, and language).During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 9:45 AM with Resident 3 in Resident 3's room, Resident 3's fingernails were observed to be long with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 9) was free from unnecessary drugs when Resident 9 was prescribed psychotropic medications (medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perceptions) and diagnosed with schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels and behaves) after admission to the facility.This failure placed Resident 9 at risk of unnecessary psychotropic medication use which could lead to medication side effects, decreased mobility, skin breakdown, and decreased ability to perform self-care tasks.Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission RECORD, indicated, he was originally admitted to the facility in mid-2017.A review of Resident 9's clinical document titled, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), (a tool used to screen for cognitive impairment, the assessment uses a point system that ranges from 0 to 15 points: a score of 13 to 15 points suggests that cognition is intact) dated 11/10/25, indicated, a score of 14.During an interview, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a required assessment for individuals with mental illness, intellectual or developmental disabilities, or related conditions, so that a determination of need, appropriate setting, and a set of recommendations for services to be included in the individual's plan of care is provided) for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 8) when, Resident 8's level I PASRR did not reflect her diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a mental disorder characterized by periods of extreme mood swings, and causes shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), anxiety disorder [a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread, and worry), major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest in activities), and schizophrenia ( a serious, chronic brain disorder causing abnormal thinking, perception, and behavior, where people…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 9) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federally mandated screening of all potential nursing home residents, for mental illness and intellectual disability,to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in a nursing home, and to ensure they receive any specialized services that are required), form was updated after a significant change in mental illness diagnosis.This failure had the potential for Resident 9 to not receive the necessary care and services required to improve Resident 9's mental health condition and quality of life.Finding: A review of Resident 9's admission RECORD, indicated, he was originally admitted to the facility in mid-2017.A review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment and screening tool which identifies care needs) Section I, titled, .Active Diagnoses, dated 2/8/21, indicated, .Psychiatric/Mood Disorder.Anxiety Disorder.Depression.Psychotic Disorder (other than schizophrenia).A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of quality care for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 expressed suicidal ideation (thinking about, considering, or planning to end one's life) and no interventions were put in place to monitor her psychosocial needs.This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to make a suicide attempt (try and end one's life) and to negatively affect her psychosocial wellbeing.A review of Resident 3's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that affects the parts of the brain that control thought, memory, and language), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), vascular dementia, (a decline in cognitive abilities due to reduced blood flow to the brain) and delusional disorders (mental health condition in which a person has false beliefs based on an inaccurate interpretation of reality).A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication and medical supply storage in the medication cart (a mobile cart with stored medications and supplies needed for administration), refrigerator, and the medication room (a locked room used to store medications and supplies) for a census of 52 residents when:1. When Resident 35's expired Sennosides (a stimulating laxative used to treat constipation) 8.6 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement), and Resident 33's expired Meclizine Hydrochloride 25 mg (an antihistamine used to prevent and treat nausea, vomiting, and dizziness) were stored in the medication cart.2. a. Discontinued Intravenous (IV, tube that is placed into a vein to deliver fluids and medications) medication belonging to a discharged resident (Resident 99) was stored in an active storage area in the refrigerator of the medication room. b. Expired (outdated) nutrition powder was stored in the active storage areas of the medication room. This failed practice had the potential for risk for medication error, resident injury, adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care and services were provided to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR- an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) was not attempted by licensed staff when Resident 1 was found unresponsive on [DATE].This failure resulted in the wishes for Resident 1's Representative/ Decisionmaker (RR) not being honored and also potentially contributed to the death of Resident 1.A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of lung diseases that cause persistent airflow obstruction and breathing problems that can significantly impact quality of life and life expectancy), encounter for palliative care (medical services where a patient receives care and support related to a serious or life-limiting illness), dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure preferences for end of life or emergency care would be honored for 3 of 22 sampled residents (Residents 12, 43, 49) when, 1. The facility failed to determine upon admission whether Resident 43 and Resident 49 had an Advance Directive (specific instructions about one's own health care) and, if not, determine whether they wished to formulate an Advance Directive; and, 2. The facility failed to ensure a copy of Resident 12's Advance Directive was available at the facility. These failures could have resulted in the residents' end of life wishes not being honored. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 43's clinical record titled, admission Record (a document that contained the resident's demographic information), the record indicated Resident 43's diagnosis included type 2 diabetes (the body's inability to control blood sugar), and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure correct medications were administered for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 22) when Resident 22 was admitted with the wrong discharging documents from the acute hospital and the error was not identified for three days after admission. This failure placed Resident 22 at risk for complications related to medications received which were not intended for her. and complications related to medications she should have received, but did not for three days. Findings: The Department received a report from the facility and a complaint regarding Resident 22's interfacility transfer (IFT) documents (IFT- a communication tool when transferring a patient to another facility which contains pertinent information regarding the patient's care received from the discharging facility and to continue care at the admitting facility) from the acute hospital indicated a different name and did not reflect the correct information at time of admission. This error caused Resident 22 to receive medications that were not prescribed for her until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the needs of 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 12) when the facility did not adequately follow up on the resident's request for a prosthetic (artificial) leg. This failure had the potential to result in loss of independence, dignity, and decreased quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's clinical record titled, admission Record (a document that contained the resident's demographic information), indicated Resident 12's diagnosis included Type 2 diabetes (inability to control blood sugar) and the absence of left leg above the knee. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/27/24, at 10:34 a.m., Resident 12 was observed in her bed with her wheelchair at the bedside. Resident 12 had her left leg amputated (a limb that had been surgically removed). Resident 12 stated she had been waiting for a year for her prosthetic leg. Resident 12 stated she was willing to put in the work with Physical Therapy to get stronger in order to walk. Resident 12 stated she would have liked a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was provided for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 55), when Resident 55 did not have enough room to store personal belongings. This deficient practice did not ensure a homelike environment that encouraged the use of personal belongings to the extent possible. Findings: Review of Resident 55's admission record indicated Resident 55 had been admitted to the facility in July of 2024. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/27/24 at 12:16 PM with a family member (FM)1, FM 1 stated he was concerned about space in the room. FM1 showed the narrow closet space dedicated to Resident 55 in bed A. FM1 then stated he felt frustrated due to lack of space for the resident's personal belongings and pointed to the drawers. FM1 indicated he was unable to use the drawers dedicated to bed A, because a previous resident's name was labeled on all of bed A's drawers. FM1 further stated that he did not feel comfortable touching the belongings that were still in the drawers. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident specific care plan (provides direction on the type of nursing care the resident may need based on their health, medication, behavioral, and psychosocial needs) for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 317) when Resident 317 did not have a care plan developed for catheter care. This failure had the potential for care needs not being met for Resident 317. Findings: A review of Resident 317's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 317 was admitted to the facility in the middle of 2024 with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection and artificial openings of urinary tract status. During a review of Resident 317's Minimum Data Set, (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 8/27/24, the MDS indicated Resident 317 had an indwelling catheter (a medical device that drains urine from the bladder to a drainage bag). A review of Resident 317's Order Summary Report, indicated, .Catheter Care for Indwelling catheter every shift for catheter care cleanse area every shift monitor for redness, irritation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 22) when Resident 22 had no documented evidence a shower was given from 8/6/24 through 8/15/24. This failure had the potential to result in poor hygiene and decreased psychosocial well-being for Resident 22. Findings: A review of Resident 22's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in the middle of 2024 with diagnoses which included presence of left artificial hip joint, diabetes mellitus (too much sugar in the blood), and heart disease. During a phone interview on 8/29/24, at 10:16 a.m. with Resident 22's Family Member (FM) 3, FM 3 stated Resident 22's shower schedule was Tuesdays and Saturdays. FM 3 stated Resident 22 did not receive a shower on a Tuesday. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/30/24, at 8:09 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Resident 22's Shower Skin Checks Sheets were reviewed. The DSD confirmed Resident 22's shower days were Tuesdays and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure correct medications were administered and correct plan of care was followed for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 22) when Resident 22 was admitted with wrong discharging documents from the acute hospital and the error was not identified for 3 days after admission. This failure placed Resident 22 to not receive the necessary care and services at time of admission and three days thereafter. Findings: The Department received a report from the facility and a complaint regarding Resident 22's interfacility transfer (IFT) documents (IFT-it is a communication tool when transferring a patient to another facility which contains pertinent information regarding the patient's care received from the discharging facility and to continue care at the admitting facility) from the acute hospital indicated a different name and did not reflect the correct information at time of admission. This error caused Resident 22 to receive medications that were not prescribed for her and care that was not intended for her until it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents and hazards for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 62) when the facility did not implement Resident 62's care planned intervention of a wheelchair alarm, and staff did not complete bed alarm checks during the night shift on 7/3/24. This failure could have been a factor in staff not being aware of Resident 62's fall outside, and had the potential increased wandering behavior would not be identified. Findings: A review of Resident 62's admission Record indicated Resident 62 was admitted to the facility in Spring of 2024 with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia (a condition in men in which the prostate gland [a gland in the male reproductive system] is enlarged), surgical aftercare following surgery on the prostate, history of falling, anxiety disorder (a nervous condition characterized by a state of excessive uneasiness, apprehension, and panic attacks that interfere with activities of daily living), major depressive disorder (a persistent feeling of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 35) who received parenteral (delivery of medication through a vein) medication was provided services consistent with professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 35's peripheral IV saline lock (a thin flexible tube placed in a vein in the hand or arm used to give medication and fluids) dressing was not dated; 2. Resident 35 did not have a care plan developed for the IV saline lock; 3. IV site care and flushing for Resident 35's IV saline lock was not documented in the medical record; and, 4. Resident 35's IV saline lock was left in place for eight days. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of infection for Resident 35 and further compromise her health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 35's admission Record indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in Spring 2024. Resident 35's admission Record indicated Resident 35's admitting diagnoses included wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra (a broken bone in the lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled medications (highly addictive and regulated medications) for 1 of 22 sampled residents (deceased Resident 58) were removed from the medication cart and the nurses did not count Resident 58's controlled medications at shift change. These failures could have resulted in medication being given to the wrong resident and/or drug diversion (the illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber) of controlled medications. Findings: A review of Resident 58's Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated Resident 58 died on [DATE]. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 3:17 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 and LN 6, the LNs counted the controlled medications for medication Cart # A (day shift)/Cart # C (PM shift). LN 1 and LN 6 acknowelged they forgot to count the controlled medications for Resident 58. LN 1 verified she should have counted Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 30) received recommended dental services when Resident 30 was not provided the dental treatment recommendation of a full mouth x-ray (a set of pictures that provides images of teeth, gums, and jaw bones) for a broken tooth which was identified on 4/22/24. This failure had the potential to result in health complications for Resident 30 including increased discomfort, infection, problems chewing food, and weight loss. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/27/24 at 10:01 AM, Resident 30 stated she needed dental care. Resident 30 reported she had dental pain in her teeth for about two months and no one had come to look at her teeth. Resident 30 stated she had told multiple staff members but did not remember which staff members. Resident 30 opened her mouth and pointed inward to her upper and lower teeth, stating she had pain. During a second interview on 8/28/24 at 2:53 PM, Resident 30 stated, I feel frustrated like I am not being heard and that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure copies of evaluations were in the resident's medical records for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 12), when the facility did not have access to copies of Resident 12's evaluations for a prosthetic (artificial) leg. This failure had the potential for medical providers not to have reviewed the recommendations regarding acquiring a prosthetic leg for Resident 12. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's clinical record titled, admission Record (a document that contained the resident's demographic information), the record indicated Resident 12's diagnosis included Type 2 diabetes (inability to control blood sugar) and absence of left leg above the knee. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/27/24, at 10:34 a.m., Resident 12 was observed in her bed with her wheelchair at the bedside. Resident 12 had her left leg amputated. Resident 12 stated she had been waiting for a year for her prosthetic leg. Resident 12 stated she was willing to put in the work with Physical Therapy to get stronger and walk.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain infection control measures when: 1. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 10 entered the room of a resident on Contact Isolation Precautions (a type of transmission based precautions intended to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms [MDRO, germs that are resistant to three or more drugs that kill infection] and other germs that cause infections that are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment) without the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE, gowns, gloves, eye protection, face masks or respirators used to prevent the spread of germs), then exited the room without performing hand hygiene (washing hands with soap and water or using alcohol-based rubs [hand sanitizers] to keep hands clean); 2. CNA 7 distributed clean water pitchers to residents on a cart with dirty water pitchers, a dirty cup, and a resident food tray with partially eaten food; and 3. Resident 46's urinary catheter bag (a bag that collects urine from a tube inserted into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident in seven shared rooms. This failure had the potential to limit the personal belongings of each resident and compromise their ability to move freely in their rooms. Findings: During an interview on 8/27/24, at 11:00 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the following rooms did not meet the minimum space requirement for each resident: Room: Occupancy Room Size 1 3 243.5 x 136.5 (231 square feet (ft 2) 3 3 244.5 x 135 (229 ft 2) 5 3 243.5 x 134 (230 ft 2) 6 3 244.3 x 136.5 (232 ft2) 8 3 244 x 136.5 (231 ft 2) 10 3 243.5 x 140.5 (238 ft2) 11 3 243.5 x 135.5 (229 ft2) During an interview on 8/28/24, at 8:51 a.m., with the Licensed Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 stated she had enough room to do her job safely in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. LN 1 stated she has not had a resident complain to her about the room size. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/28/24, at 8:53 a.m., with Resident 47, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notice of a facility-initiated discharge to the appropriate parties for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when, Resident 1 was provided a notice of discharge for failure to pay on 1/3/24 and the notice was not sent to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a patient rights advocate). This failure resulted in the State LTC Ombudsman being uninformed of the discharge decision, removed the opportunity for the State LTC Ombudsman to advocate on Resident 1's behalf, and removed the State LTC Ombudsman awareness of the facility's activities related to discharges. Findings: During an interview on 2/5/24, at 4:24 p.m., the Ombudsman stated Resident 1 informed her the facility provided Resident 1 a thirty-day notice of discharge. The Ombudsman stated the State LTC Ombudsman office had not received a thirty-day notice of discharge from the facility for Resident 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/6/24, at 3:02 p.m., a document titled STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notice of a facility-initiated discharge (a resident is given 30 days notice to find another place to live) to the appropriate parties for Resident 1 when, Resident 1's representative (RR, a designated person to make decisions for another person) was provided a notice of discharge on [DATE] and the notice was not sent to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a resident rights advocator) at the same time. This failure had the potential for the State LTC Ombudsman not being aware of Resident 1's facility initiated transfer/discharge and potentially prevented the opportunity for the State LTC Ombudsman to advocate for resident 1's rights. Findings: During an interview on 2/14/24, at 9 a.m., the Ombudsman stated the State LTC Ombudsman office had not received a notice of discharge from the facility for Resident 1. Review of Resident 1's Social Services Note dated 11/20/23, indicated, The resident's [Resident 1]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure needs of the residents were accommodated for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3), when call lights were not within reach for Resident 1 and Resident 3. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 3 being unable to ask for needed assistance and placed them at risk for falling. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/30/23, at 1:45 p.m., with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 looked for his call light within his bed linens. Resident 1 stated he could not find the call light and wanted to get out of bed. Resident 1 further stated he needed to yell for help to get a nurse to come to the room. Resident 1 explained the facility staff instructed him to call for assistance to get in and out of bed. The call light for Resident 1 was observed hanging against the wall, looped over the section of the cord where the call light system was attached to the wall. Resident 1 was not able to reach the call light while in bed. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were used to prevent the spread of germs when: 1. Facility staff and one visitor did not wear protective equipment (such as gowns and gloves) prior to entering the room of a Clostridium-Difficile (C-Diff- a bacteria that causes inflammation of the colon and can be transmitted from person to person by spores) positive resident (Resident 5) and did not perform hand hygiene. 2. Cleaning of a Glucometer (a device for measuring the concentration of sugar in the blood) was not completed after use. 3. Recommended cleaning wipes were not used to clean Resident 5's room. These failures had the potential to spread germs to residents, staff, and visitors within the facility. Findings: During an observation, on 9/21/23, at 6:22 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have signage for contact precautions (precautions intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents which are spread by direct or indirect contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative (RNA-nursing intervention to increase or maintain resident's mobility and to prevent further decline in mobility) treatment and services to 2 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 13, and Resident 25) when: 1. No interventions were used to address Resident 13's left hand contracture (when muscles, tendons, joints, or other tissues tighten or shorten causing a deformity and loss of movement); and, 2. Range of motion (ROM, the degree of movement that occurs at a given joint during an exercise) exercises were not provided as ordered for Resident 13 and Resident 25. These failures placed Resident 13 and Resident 25 at risk for not maintaining their highest practicable level of physical well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 13's admission Record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) affecting the left side, cerebrovascular disease (a group of disorders that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure reconciliation and accountability of controlled medications (medications with high potential for abuse or addiction) and accurate medication administration when, 1. A random controlled medication use audit for Resident 25 did not reconcile. The medication was signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but was not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR, a legal document used to record medications given to the residents) on multiple occasions to indicate it was given to Resident 25; and, 2. Resident 38's medications were left unattended and unsupervised on her bedside table. These failures had the potential for diversion and/or misuse of controlled medications in the facility and possible under or over medicating the residents, and had the potential to result in harm to Resident 38 and to other residents who could gain access to her medications. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 25's clinical record indicated Resident 25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and supplies were clearly labeled, safely handled, properly stored, and disposed of in accordance with manufacturer guidelines and accepted professional standards for a census of 55 when: 1. An opened bottle of Lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety and sleeping problems with high potential for abuse or addiction) was stored in the medication room refrigerator without an opened-date label and initials; 2. A bubble pack (a form of packaging where an individual pushes individually sealed tablets through the foil to remove the medication) of Divalproex Sodium (a medication used to treat certain types of seizures/epilepsy) was stored in medication cart C with no hazardous drug label; 3. An opened foil tray of Breo Ellipta inhalation powder (a medication used to prevent and control symptoms of asthma for better breathing), an opened Spiriva Respimat inhalation spray (a maintenance medication used as treatment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure shared resident bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in a total of 7 resident rooms. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of resident care, to maintain privacy, and to allow for residents' personal property. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/17/23, at 1:56 PM, the maintenance supervisor (MS) measured rooms 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 11 with a measuring tape. The administrator (ADM) and the MS confirmed the room measurements. The ADM provided the following documented room measurements for the resident rooms which did not meet the minimum space requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in shared bedrooms: Room Occupancy Required/actual sq. ft. Sq. Ft. per resident 1 3 residents 240/231 sq. ft. 77 3 3 residents 240/229 sq. ft. 76.3 5 3 residents 240/230 sq. ft. 76.66 6 3 residents 240/232 sq. ft. 77.3 8 3 residents 240/231 sq. ft. 77 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 49 and Resident 34), had a care plan (a formal process which identifies existing needs and recognizes potential needs or risks) developed to address: 1. Resident 49's pressure ulcer (PU-pressure related damage to the skin and underlying tissue) to left (L) heel; and, 2. Resident 34's midline catheter (a catheter inserted into a vein in the upper arm with the tip located just below the armpit). This failure had the potential for Resident 49's and Resident 34's care needs and goals not being addressed. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 49's Order Summary Report, dated 8/15/23, indicated, .PU (L heel) - Cleanse with NS [normal saline], pat dry, and [apply] silver alginate [treatment for PU], cover with foam dressing every day shift for 14 days . During an interview on 8/15/23 at 1:47 p.m. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2, he confirmed Resident 49 had a pressure ulcer on the left heel. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 8:40 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 17), was provided nail care in a timely manner. This failure resulted in Resident 17 having long, and untrimmed fingernails and toenails that could potentially cause injury, pain, and infection. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/15/23 at 10:39 a.m. with Resident 17 in Resident 17's room, Resident 17 had long and untrimmed fingernails and toenails on both hands and feet. Resident 17 stated her fingernails and toenails needed to be clipped (trimmed) and her family member asked staff to clip her nails about two weeks ago and still had not been done. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/15/23 at 11:31 a.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2 in Resident 17's room, CNA 2 confirmed Resident 17's fingernails and toenails were long and untrimmed. CNA 2 stated the nails needed attention and went on to say Resident 17's fingernails and toenails needed clipping by the responsible staff. CNA 2 also stated Resident 17 could scratch her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement preventative measures to reduce the risk of elopement (an act or instance when a cognitively impaired person leaves a safe area or premises unsupervised) for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 16) when an elopement assessment was not completed after Resident 16 eloped the facility. This failure placed Resident 16 at an increased risk for elopement and physical harm due to her behavior of wandering in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2023. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/15/23 at 10:35 a.m. with Resident 16 in her room, Resident 16 was observed to be fully dressed in street clothes and was sitting on the side of her bed exposing a wanderguard bracelet (a monitoring device used to alert staff of a resident leaving the premises) on her left ankle. When asked why she had a bracelet around her left ankle, Resident 16 stated that one day she decided she did not want to live in the facility anymore,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication monitoring for high-risk medication use (drugs with potential to cause harm without monitoring) in 3 out of a sample of 19 residents (Resident 3, Resident 17, and Resident 19) when: 1. Resident 3 was prescribed high risk medications for diabetes (Blood Sugar Disease) without side effect monitoring or guidance for nursing staff for safe use; 2. Resident 17 was prescribed high risk anticoagulant (blood thinner) medications without side effect monitoring or a care plan which addressed specific symptoms to watch for; and, 3. High risk anticoagulant medications were not monitored for side effects on a regular basis for Resident 19. These failures could result in unsafe medication use and adverse consequences. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3's electronic medical record, titled Medication Administration Record (or MAR, a list of medications and interventions nursing staff followed and documented), dated 8/2023, the MAR indicated Resident 3 was taking medications to treat blood sugar disease as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe cleaning and sanitization of a shared glucometer (a device which measures blood sugar using blood from the fingertip) between resident care for two out of a census of 55 residents (Resident 43 and Resident 48). This failure could result in spread of infection and cross contamination of shared devices. Findings: During a medication administration observation with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), on 8/15/23, at 8:52 AM, LN 1 measured Resident 43's blood sugar using a glucometer which was shared between residents. LN 1 used a lancet (a sharp piercing device) to pierce Resident 43's finger to get blood and then applied the blood to the test strip that was attached to the glucometer. LN 1 then exited the room and cleaned the glucometer's outer surface with one wipe for less than 10 seconds and placed it on top of a container storing blood sugar measuring supplies. During a medication administration observation with LN 2, on 8/15/23, at 9:48 AM, LN 2 measured Resident 48's blood sugar using a glucometer. LN 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of antibiotic medication (used to treat bacterial infections) within the antibiotic stewardship program, for one of nine residents (Resident 48) when Resident 48's antibiotic order did not have an end date. This failure increased Resident 48's risk for an infection with bacterial organisms resistive to certain antibiotics (MDRO; multidrug-resistant organisms, germs that are resistant to many antibiotics) in the facility. Findings: Review of Resident 48's admission RECORD indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility in mid 2023. Review of Resident 48's Order Summary Report, indicated Resident 48 had a physician order for Doxycycline Hyclate [antibiotic medication used to treat bacterial infection] Oral Tablet 100 MG [milligram, a unit of measurement] .Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI [urinary tract infection] ppx [prophylaxis, a treatment taken to prevent a disease] .Start Date .8/6/23 . There was no end date listed. Review of Resident 48's Medication Administration Record (MAR),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 19 sampled resident's (Resident 34) equipment was in safe operating condition, when Resident 34's call light had an exposed wire. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 34's safety, comfort, and well-being. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/15/23 at 3:18 p.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 in Resident 34's room, Resident 34's call light was observed on top of the bed. LN 1 stated Resident 34's call light had an exposed red and black wire approximately 1 inch (unit of measurement) long. LN 1 pressed Resident 34's call light and stated the call light was still working. LN 1 stated a resident's call light with an exposed wire was not acceptable and it should be fixed. LN 1 further stated this could be a safety issue and there was the potential for Resident 34's call light to stop working. LN 1 explained Resident 34 used her call light to get help from staff. During an interview on 8/18/23 at 11:54 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-12-05 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the total actual staffing hours worked Per Patient Day (PPD - a metric system used to measure staffing to resident ratio over 24 hours). This failure could have given a false sense of the facility being adequality staffed to meet the resident's needs. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/4/25 at 11:43 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development/Infection Preventionist (DSD/IP), the facility's document titled, Census and Direct Care Services Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD), dated 12/4/25, was posted on the staff bulletin board, without an Actual Direct Care Service (ADCS - actual hours nursing staff works per resident in a day) hours on it, and with no staff signature. The DSD/IP stated she completed the actual direct care services hours on the DHPPD form either on the following work day during the day shift, or before she left the facility at 4:30 p.m. The DSD/IP further stated the reason she completed a DHPPD form each day was so that the residents, visitors, and families were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a total of seven (7) shared resident bedrooms (rooms 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 and 11) measured at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. - unit of measurement) per resident.This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of resident care, to maintain privacy, and to allow for space to house the residents' personal property.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/5/25 at 11:57 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS confirmed there were a few rooms that did not meet the minimum 80 sq. ft. per resident in the shared bedrooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 3, 8, 10, 11, and two other rooms). The MS measured room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] with a tape measure. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had three residents occupied in the rooms. The MS confirmed room [ROOM NUMBER] measured at 135 inches (unit of measurement) in width and 243.5 inches in length, room [ROOM NUMBER] measured at 135.5 inches…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-08-18 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure direct care staffing information was posted in a prominent place as required for a census of 55. This failure prevented the residents and visitors from viewing the hours and number of direct care staff providing care to the residents of the facility on a daily basis. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/16/23 at 2:28 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) at the nurses' station, the bulletin board was observed. The DSD stated the facility only posted the number of planned staff for the day. The DSD further stated payroll completed the facility's Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD-the total number of hours worked per patient/day divided by the average daily resident census to determine the amount of nursing hours allotted per day) on a daily basis and it was stored in their office. When asked if the DHPPD information was posted daily, the DSD explained she never knew the DHPPD information had to be posted. During an interview on 8/16/23 at 2:30 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Berkley East Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Bixby Towers Post-Acute RehabLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Ocean Pointe Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 2 of 5Woodland Post-AcuteWoodland, CA 3 of 5Berkley Post-AcuteVan Nuys, CA 3 of 5Berkley West Healthcare CenterSanta Monica, CA 3 of 5Kei-Ai South Bay Healthcare CenterGardena, CA 3 of 5Lake Park Healthcare CenterOakland, CA 3 of 5Marina Pointe Healthcare & SubacuteCulver City, CA 3 of 5Mission Palms Healthcare CenterWestminster, CA 3 of 5Riverwood Health CareStockton, CA 3 of 5Sierra Vista HealthcareFresno, CA 3 of 5The Gardens Healthcare CenterNorthridge, CA 4 of 5Alta Healthcare Center of CamarilloCamarillo, CA 4 of 5Country Crest Post-AcuteOroville, CA 4 of 5Lodi Nursing & RehabilitationLodi, CA 4 of 5North Park Post-AcuteTracy, CA 4 of 5San Juan Hills Healthcare CenterSan Juan Capistrano, CA 4 of 5South Marin Health & Wellness CenterGreenbrae, CA 4 of 5The Rehabilitation Center At The PalazzoPhoenix, AZ 4 of 5Villa Valencia Healthcare CenterLaguna Hills, CA 5 of 5Cottonwood Healthcare CenterWoodland, CA 5 of 5Greenridge Post AcuteEl Sobrante, CA 5 of 5Hillcrest Heights Healthcare CenterSan Diego, CA 5 of 5La Casa Via Transitional Care CenterWalnut Creek, CA 5 of 5Oakland Heights Nursing And RehabilitationOakland, CA 5 of 5Pacific Heights Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5Petaluma Post-Acute RehabilitationPetaluma, CA 5 of 5Stonebrook Health And RehabilitationLos Gatos, CA 5 of 5The Avenues Transitional Care CenterSan Francisco, CA 5 of 5The Springs Healthcare Center At The CarlottaPalm Desert, CA 5 of 5University Post-Acute RehabSacramento, CA 5 of 5Woodlands Healthcare CenterLos Gatos, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2012
ATMC LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/07/2012
BRADSHAW, PETERIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/07/2023
ELSNER, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/07/2012
KIRKWOOD, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
ORGILL, CRAIGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
PARTI, RAJESHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/07/2012
PARTI, SHRUTYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/07/2012
PAXMAN, MARCUSIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
BRADSHAW, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2026
BRADY, VERNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2012
CASE, RYANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2012
RAWE, COLTONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
FISHER, BRYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2017
PATEL, SUNILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
CTCY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
EAST WEST BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/07/2012
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/07/2012
SEQUOIA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/07/2012
JURADO, FRANKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$994K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 21%Other / private 11%

This home reported $994K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$443per resident / day
operating cost
$13,477per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$493per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555080. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next