San Juan Hills Healthcare Center
31741 Rancho Viejo Road, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (949) 248-8855 Medicare only — no Medicaid
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
67.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 393 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.89 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 67.4%CMS range 62.5–71.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.8–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 73.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 6.3–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 42.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.32 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
64 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Intakes: CA00872022 Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residen (Resident 1) remained free from accident hazards. * Resident 1 sustained 6 falls while having resided in the facility. Resident 1 sustained the falls on 9/15 (twice), 9/21, 9/26, 10/11, and 10/24/23. After Resident 1 ' s fourth fall in the facility, the facility ' s IDT recommended and implemented the 1 to 1 staff supervision on Resident 1. However, the 1 to 1 supervision was not always provided to Resident 1. As a result, Resident 1 sustained another fall on 10/24/23, resulting in multiple fractured ribs which required the ORIF surgery for Resident 1 ' s right seventh through 10thribs. Findings: Review of the facility ' s P&P titled Falls Management Program revised 1/2019 showed the purpose of the fall management program is to provide residents with a hazard free environment, adequate supervision and reduce risk factors leading to falls and injury. The facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to meet the resident's care needs for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to complete a Change of Condition (COC) report and corresponding documentation related to Resident 2's new physician's order for the intravenous fluids due to poor oral intake. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive adequate and timely care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised on 5/2017 showed the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical and/or mental condition and/or status (such as changes in level of care, billing and/or payments, resident rights, etc.). The P&P further showed the nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bedside for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1. * Multiple medications including oral, topical, and subcutaneous medications were left unattended at Resident 1's bedside without authorization for beside storage. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to inaccurately self-administer the medications.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Storage of Medications revised 4/2007 showed the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Drugs and biologicals shall be stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications dated 4/2008 showed residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure information regarding the administration of psychotherapeutic medications was provided for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1's psychotherapeutic drug informed consent form for Depakote (anticonvulsant) was incomplete and inaccurate. * Resident 1's psychotherapeutic drug informed consent form for mirtazapine (antidepressant) was incomplete. * Resident 1's psychotherapeutic drug informed consent form for seroquel (antipsychotic) was incomplete * Resident 1's psychotherapeutic drug informed consent form for olanzapine (Zyprexa Zydis, antipsychotic) was incomplete These failures posed the risk of Resident 1's Responsible Party to not understand the risks, benefits, and purpose of the medications she was consenting for the facility to administer to Resident 1.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Antipsychotic Medication Use dated 2016 showed PRN orders for psychotropic medications should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the proper labeling and dating of the food items in the main kitchen and satellite kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the expired food items in the main & satellite kitchen were discarded. * One of one ice machine was not clean. * The facility failed to ensure a dry food storage container was properly sealed. * The facility failed to ensure the food preparation equipment were in good condition. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting board was kept in a sanitary condition. * The kitchen utensils and dishware were not stored in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the food preparation equipment were properly air dried prior to storage. * The floor in the walk-in refrigerator was littered with various rubbish of vegetables and fruits. These failures had the potential to cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the infection control practices designed to provide the safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to implement the infection control surveillance program for the months of January 2025 through August 2025. The facility conducted surveillance of resident infections only when the residents were prescribed antimicrobial medications and/or if the residents were diagnosed with an infection. The facility failed to determine whether the residents who exhibited signs and symptoms of infection and were not prescribed antimicrobial medications, or had not been diagnosed with an infection, met the facility's criteria for infection (utilizing McGeer's Criteria). The facility failed to include these residents in the facility's infection control surveillance program. * The facility failed to ensure the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one non-sampled resident (Resident 68) was assessed, had a care plan and a physician's order to self-administer the medications. * Resident 68's bedside table had Neosporin (antibiotic medication) ointment. There were no assessment, care plan or physician's order to self-administer this medication. This failure had the potential for the resident to administer the medication inaccurately and negatively impact the residents' physiological well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medication revised 12/2016 showed the residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so.- As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered care plans to reflect the individual care needs for two of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 67 and 72). * The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident 67's right upper arm midline catheter and the administration of Dextrose - NaCl solution 5-0.45% (an IV fluid used for hydration and electrolyte replenishment). * The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident 72's use of siderails. These failures had the potential risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to these residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised 12/2016 showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care was revised to reflect the resident's current care needs and interventions for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 64).* Resident 64's care plan for alteration in functional mobility and presence of pain related to nondisplaced type III odontoid (neck bone) fracture was not revised to address the use of the neck collar brace as ordered by the physician. This posed the risk of not providing the resident with individualized and person-centered care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 12/2016 showed the areas of concern are identified during the resident assessment will be evaluated before the interventions are added to the care plan. Interventions are chosen only after careful data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful considerations of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of one final sampled resident (Residents 67) reviewed for IV care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 67's parenteral fluids were administered in accordance with the physician's order, and the right upper arm midline catheter was changed as per the facility's P&P. These failures had the potential for Resident 67 to not maintain adequate hydration and/or electrolyte levels and delay the identification of catheter related complications.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Midline Catheter Dressing Change dated 3/2023 showed the catheter dressing changes are to be performed by RNs and IV certified LVNs according to state law and facility policy. Dressing changes using transparent dressings are performed at least weekly. On 1/20/26 at 0827 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, an observation and concurrent interview for Resident 67 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the respiratory services for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 12 and 63) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 12's nasal cannula tubing was changed as per the facility's P&P. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula tubing was stored in a set-up bag when not in use. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 63's nebulizer tubing and mask were changed every week as per the facility's P&P. These failures posed the risk of complications and negative health outcomes to Resident 12 and 63.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Respiratory Therapy – Prevention of Infection dated 11/15/23, showed the purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff. Change the oxygen cannula and tubing every seven (7) days, or as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the monitoring of output and fluid restriction were followed for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 71 and 72) reviewed for dialysis. * The facility failed to ensure the output was properly monitored for Resident 71. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's order for 1500 ml of fluid restriction was followed and carried out accordingly for Resident 72. These failures had the potential of not identifying potential negative outcomes for the dialysis residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Intake, Measuring and Recording revised 10/2010 showed the purpose of this procedure is to accurately determine the amount of liquid a resident consumes in a 24-hour period. If the resident is medically capable of understanding the procedure, ask him or her to assist you in telling you when he or she drank some fluid and how much he or she drank. Record the fluid intake as soon as possible after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three final sampled residents (Resident 72) reviewed for the use of bed rails remained free from accident hazards associated with the use of elevated bed rails. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's order was obtained for the use of the right upper bed rail for Resident 72. In addition, an IDT assessment was not conducted prior to the use of the right upper bed rail. This failure had the potential to put the resident at risk for serious injuries.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bed Rails - Safe Use Policy revised 10/2025 showed the following:- when bed rail use is desired/considered, Resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the Interdisciplinary Team, considering safety needs, entrapment risks, medical conditions/symptoms, cognitive/behavioral status, functional needs, comfort, freedom of movement, and input from the resident and family regarding previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food items were served in the appetizing and safe temperatures. * The food temperatures were above the recommended temperature for cold desserts. This failure posed the risk of not providing safe food for the residents receiving a meal tray from the kitchen.Findings: Review of the facility's Diet Type Report dated 1/20/26, showed 42 of 42 residents consumed the food prepared in the kitchen. According to the USDA Food Code 2022 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding, bacterial growth and/or toxin production can occur if time/temperature control for safety food remains in the temperature Danger Zone of 5 degrees Celsius to 57 degrees Celsius (41 degrees Fahrenheit to 135 degrees Fahrenheit) too long. Maintaining temperature controlled foods under the cold temperature control requirements prescribed in this code will limit the growth of pathogens that may be present in or on the food and may help prevent foodborne illness. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment was complete. * The facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment addressed or included the active involvement of required individuals in developing the Facility Assessment and resources necessary to care for residents including weekends. This failure had the potential not to meet the residents' care needs if the assessed population's needs and resources were not comprehensively identified and addressed.Findings: According to the CMS QSO-24-13-NH dated 6/18/24, with an implementation date of 8/8/24, CMS had issued a revised guidance for long-term care facility assessment requirement. The Facility Assessment should address and included the active involvement of the direct care staff in developing the Facility Assessment. Also included the staffing resources necessary to care for the residents, including the weekends; a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff member, and a contingency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' entrapment assessments were completed and the measurements were recorded during the bed inspection when identifying areas of possible entrapment with the use of side rails for two of three final sampled residents (Residents 72 and 75) reviewed for side rails use. * The facility failed to ensure the entrapment assessment of bed rails were completed for Residents 72 and 75. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death.Findings: According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Patient entrapment may result in deaths and serious injuries. These entrapment events have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to notify the physician when the resident had a change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to notify the physician when Resident 1 had low blood pressure readings. This had the potential for a delay in the physician prescribing necessary treatments and interventions for the resident.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 12/2012 showed if a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident, or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associated with adverse consequences, the person preparing or administering the medication shall contact the resident's Attending Physician of the facility's Medical Director to discuss the concerns. Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised 5/2017 showed our facility shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to properly assess Resident 1's bowel function and provided the timely interventions as ordered by the physician when Resident 1 had no bowel movement. This failure posed a risk for the resident not to receive the necessary care and interventions to maintain the resident's normal bowel function.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bowel and Bladder Program revised 6/2021 showed it is the policy of this facility that the bowel and bladder assessment of the resident will be performed to attain and maintain the highest bowel and bladder function. Closed medical review for Resident 1 was initiated on 7/15/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 6/6/25. Review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report showed a care plan problem initiated on 5/28/25, addressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary conditions in the satellite and main kitchens. This failure posed the risk of food services not meeting professional standards Findings: Review of the Residents' Order Summary Report dated 11/12/24, showed 41 of 42 residents received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. 1. On 11/12/24 at 0750 hours, an inspection of the facility's satellite kitchen was initiated. The following findings were observed: - a plastic see through container of juice was observed defrosting under running water in the hand wash sink of the satellite kitchen. The sink was observed with yellow and black stains, and a piece of wet paper towel in it. When asked about this finding, Dietary Aide 1 verified the findings. - a gnat was observed flying inside the satellite kitchen. - the portable plate lowerator was observed with rust. CDM 1 verified the finding and verified there was no cleaning log for the lowerator. - the drain near the dishwasher was dirty and with food particles in it. CDM 1 verified the finding. b. On 11/12/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the self-administration of medications was safe for one of 14 final sampled resident (Resident 132) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 14). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' physiological well-being and administer the medications inaccurately. Findings: 1. During an initial tour of the facility on 11/12/24 at 0814 hours, a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 132. Resident 132 was observed lying in bed. Resident 132 was noted with one bottle of Biotin (supplement) 10,000 mcg, one bottle of coconut oil extra virgin oil 1000 mg, one bottle of hair growth medication on the TV (television) stand drawer. Resident 132 stated she had been taking the medications since she was admitted in the facility. On 11/12/24 at 0823 hours, an observation and concurrent interview with the MDS Coordinator was conducted. The MDS Coordinator was asked about the process of self-administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to address the concerns brought forth in the resident council meetings (a group of residents gathered to discuss interest and issues noted in the facility) and failed to notify two nonsampled residents (Residents 12 and 137) who filed the grievances regarding the outcomes of investigation. These failures had the potential for the residents' identified issues to go uncorrected. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Council revised 4/2017 showed a Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern. Review of the facility's Resident Council Departmental Feedback Form showed the Department to return the response to the Activity Director within two to three days of the meeting date. a. Review of the facility's document titled Resident Council Meeting Agenda & Notes dated 8/9/24, showed the following concerns: - The staff were loud in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of one final sampled resident (Resident 16) who had a mental disorder was referred to state PASARR representative for Level II evaluation and determination screening process. This failure pose risk for the resident not to receive adequate level of services, comprehensive assessment, intervention, and evaluation for conditions related to mental disorder. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Preadmission Screening & Resident Review (PASRR) dated 11/30/23, showed the facility will confirm the PASARR process was completed by the hospital by accepting and reviewing the PASRR documentation submitted. If the facility determines that the hospital did not initiate the PASARR, the facility will contact the hospital and request to initiate the file exchange prior to discharge. Medical record review for Resident 16 was initiated on 11/12/24. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility's P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide the safe environment free from potentially serious accident hazards for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 383 and 432) who smoked in the facility. - Resident 383 was not accurately and thoroughly assessed to determine if they required supervision or any adaptive equipment while smoking, nor if they could safely store their own cigarettes or lighters. - Resident 432's smoking paraphernalia was left unsupervised. The residents who were assessed as requiring supervision or those with a history of non-compliance with the facility's smoking P&P were permitted to keep the cigarettes, lighters, and other smoking materials in their possession. - The facility failed to ensure the designated area for smoking outside the facility have readily available and accessible portable fire extinguishers and fire-retardant smoking aprons as per the facility's smoking P&P. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 285) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 436) to maintain or restore their bladder functions. * The facility failed to provide a bladder retraining for Resident 285 as identified in the care plan and facility's P&P. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 436 was placed on toileting program and a care plan to address Resident 436's toileting needs was developed. These failures posed the risk for these residents to lose their bladder control. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bowel and Bladder Program dated 6/2021 showed on admission of the resident, the admission nurse will initiate an elimination schedule every two hours regardless if the resident is continent or incontinent. The admission Nurse will communicate to the CNAs and licensed nurse. The CNAs will document the result of their visit with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of two final sampled residents (Residents 132 and 282) reviewed for respiratory care were provided with the appropriate respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 132 and 282's physician's order for administration of oxygen was clarified with the physician for continuous or PRN use. This failure had the potential to effect the respiratory health and well-being of the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised October 2010 showed to verify there is a physician's order for this procedure and review the physician's order or facility protocol for the oxygen administration. 1. On 11/13/24 at 1441 hours, Resident 132 was observed in bed with oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute. Medical record review for Resident 132 was initiated on 11/13/24. Resident 132 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 132's Order Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmaceutical services were provided when: * The facility failed to ensure all controlled medications were accurately accounted for and documented for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 432). * The medications received from pharmacy were accounted and signed for by the licensed staff who received the medications at the facility. * The facility failed to ensure the proper disposal of medications was followed. These failures posed the risk of drug diversion. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Storage in the Facility ID3: Controlled Medication Storage dated 8/2014 showed the medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handing, storage, disposal and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state and other applicable laws and regulations. Further review of the facility's P&P showed at each shift change, a physical inventory of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the orthostatic blood pressure monitoring was accurately performed as ordered by the physician related to the use of antipsychotic medication for one of one final resident (Resident 132) reviewed for antipsychotic medications. This failure had the potential for the resident to have adverse complications from the medication and the potential of not providing the correct data to the prescriber to adjust the dose of the psychotropic medication for the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Measuring Blood Pressure dated 9/2010 showed the orthostatic (postural) hypotension is defined as a 20 mm/hg (or greater) decline in systolic blood pressure (top number) or a 10 mm/hg (or greater) decline in diastolic blood pressure (bottom number) upon standing. Note the changes in both systolic and diastolic measurements compare to the reading taken while the resident was in a seated position. Medical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 7.14% One licensed nurse (LVN 4) was found to have made error during the medication administration. * Resident 134 had a physician's order for Calcium Carbonate Tablet Chewable 500 mg one tablet by mouth one time a day for indigestion, chew and swallow. LVN 4 did not administer the medication as ordered by the physician. * Resident 4 had a physician's order for Effexor XR (medication to treat depression) Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 hour 75 mg one capsule by mouth one time a day for depression m/b persistent expression of hopelessness, give with food. LVN 4 did not administer the medication with food as ordered by the physician. These failures resulted in the residents not receiving the medications as ordered by the physicians, posed the risk of adverse effects, and had the potential to negatively affect the residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure the proper medication storage. * The facility failed to ensure the expired treatment medications were removed from the medication cart. * The facility failed to ensure to separate the externally and internally medications from the medication cart and Medication Room A. * The facility failed to ensure proper storage of feeding formula and temperature monitoring. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being, and medication errors. Findings Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Storage in the Facility dated 4/2008 showed orally administered medications are kept separate from externally used medication, such as suppositories, liquids and lotion. 1.a. On [DATE] at 1046 hours, a medication cart inspection for Medication Cart A was conducted with RN 1. During the inspection of Medication Cart A, the following was observed: - seven individual packs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff were competent in the skills needed to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. This failure posed the risk of the residents not receiving appropriate food and nutrition services. Findings: Review of the Residents' Order Summary Report dated 11/12/24, showed 41 of 42 residents received food prepared from the kitchen. 1.a. On 11/12/24 at 0750 hours, a kitchen inspection of the facility's satellite kitchen was initiated with CDM 1. CDM 1 was asked about checking the dishwasher located inside the facility's kitchen. The dishwasher was observed to have a label with the words prewash temperature 120 degrees F. CDM 1 pointed to the label on the dishwasher and stated that was the cycle to check the temperature for the dishwasher. The temperature was a low temperature dishwasher and supposed to be checked during the wash cycle to ensure it was working properly. Review of the Temperature Log Dish Machine Low temp showed the wash cycle temperature was to be checked. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the menu and diet orders were followed as evidenced by: * Chicken salad was not documented on the cool down log. * The kitchen staff did not use the correct serving size scoop. * The temperatures for milk and cottage cheese were not taken at the tray line. Cottage cheese was not maintained at the acceptable temperature. * Plates of dessert were near the dirty sink. * Tray ticket was inaccurate for one of 14 final sampled resident (Resident 383) * Food item was not served as per the tray ticket for one nonsampled resident (Resident A). * The lunch tray included a food item not appropriate for the resident's prescribed diet order for one nonsampled resident (Resident 136). * The facility failed to ensure the menu and diet order were followed for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 9). These findings posed the risk of the residents not receiving nutritional adequacy. Findings: Review of the Residents' Order Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow the puree recipe for seven residents on puree diet. This failure posed the risk of the residents not receiving foods prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value. Findings: Review of the Residents' Order Summary Report dated 11/12/24, showed seven residents received puree food prepared from the kitchen. On 11/14/24 at 1000 hours, an observation of puree meals preparation was conducted with [NAME] 1. Cook 1 stated she was preparing puree the foods for a total of seven residents and would prepare the foods for 10 servings. During the puree preparation for peas, [NAME] 1 was observed adding chicken broth to the cooked peas while the recipe showed to add liquid used to cook peas. [NAME] 1 was then observed to keep adding thickener to obtain the right consistency for the peas and manually mixing the food item with a whisk. The recipe showed to use one and one half tablespoons of thickener. [NAME] 1 was then observed to puree other main entree items and continue to add multiple tablespoons of thickener to the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the therapeutic diets were served as prescribed by the residents' physicians for one of 14 final sampled resident (Resident 16) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 284). * Resident 284 was not served the prescribed diet. * Resident 16 was served Magic cup (supplement) but not listed on the physician's orders. These failures had the potential for the residents not meeting the therapeutic needs. Findings: Review of the Residents' Order Summary Report dated 11/12/24, showed 41 of 42 residents received food prepared from the kitchen. 1. On 11/12/14 at 1120 hours, during a dining room observation, LVN 2 was observed checking the residents' meal trays against the residents' meal tickets. When asked about verifying diets against the physician's orders, LVN 2 verbalized she had most of the residents' diets memorized. When asked to check the meal served, meal ticket, and list of the physician's orders for Resident 284, LVN 2 stated the meal served was no added salt, regular diet while the physician's diet order showed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were followed for two of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 132 and 435) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 134); in the laundry area; hand washing; and preventing Legionella. * The facility failed to perform handwashing before and after assisting Resident 435 with meals * The facility failed to perform handwashing before and after medication administration for Residents 132 and 134. * The facility failed to ensure infection control practices was maintained in the facility's laundry room when a facility staff personal clothing was stored with the rack of clean pillows. * The facility failed to ensure the water management program was established and implemented to include the implementation of measures to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens; and a way to monitor the measures they had in place These failures posed the risk for transmission of disease-causing microorganisms and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to monitor and address the use of antibiotics when the resident's condition did not meet McGeer's criteria (a set of specific definitions to identify true infections in long term nursing facilities) for two residents (one discharged resident, Resident 10; and one nonsampled resident, Resident 7) on the surveillance log. This failure had the potential for antibiotics to be used when it was not indicated and the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program dated 6/2021 showed appropriate use of antibiotic included criteria met for clinical definition of active infection or suspected sepsis and pathogen susceptibility, based on culture and sensitivity, to antimicrobial (or therapy begun while culture is pending). The IP will track, collect and review data whether McGeer criteria was met to consider prescribing antibiotics. Review of the Survillance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the freezer compartment inside the medication refrigerator inside Medication Room A was free of ice buildup. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the freezer temperature was monitored and recorded in the temperature log. These failure had the potential for not maintaining the acceptable temperature for medication storage in the refrigerator. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Medication Room, Refrigerator, Temperature Log dated 11/2024 showed to verify and document refrigerator, freezer, and room temperatures twice per day (AM/PM). If any temperature is outside of the range(s) below, notify the Nurse Leader or Health Care Administrator. On 11/14/24 at 0837 hours, an inspection of Medication Room A and concurrent interview was conducted with the DON. On 11/14/24 at 0956 hours, during Medication Room A inspection, the medication refrigerator was observed to have ice build up in the freezer compartment. There were ice packs stored in the freezer compartment and there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' entrapment assessments were accurate and complete, and the measurements were recorded during the bed inspection when identifying areas of possible entrapment with the use of bed rails for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 132). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death. Findings: According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Patient entrapments may result in deaths and serious injuries. These entrapment events have occurred in openings within the bed rails, between the bed rails and mattresses, under bed rails, between split rails, and between the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen when: * Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods (food that require time and temperature controls to limit the growth of illness causing bacteria) were not accurately monitored to ensure proper cool down process was followed. * The thawing process for meats was not performed as per the facility's P&P. * The expired food item in the kitchen was not discarded and was consumed by the resident. * One kitchen staff and one maintenance staff did not perform proper hand hygiene in the kitchen. * The handwashing sink was used for duties other than handwashing. * Trash was stored inappropriately in the kitchen. * Two kitchen staff and one non-staff personnel did not don hair or beard coverings in the kitchen. * The kitchen utensils and equipment were not stored or kept in sanitary conditions. * The kitchen utensils were not in good condition. * The dry storage bin was not labeled correctly. * Food was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to determine if it was safe for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 580) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 22) to self-administer the medication left at the bedside. * Resident 22 was observed with clobetasol propionate ointment (corticosteroid medication used to treat skin conditions) medication at bedside. Resident 22 did not have the assessment, physician's order, and care plan problem addressing the resident's self-administration of medication. * Resident 580 was observed with one bottle of Systane (eye drop lubricant) medication left unattended at bedside. Resident 580 did not have a physician's order, assessment, and care plan for self-administration of medications. These failures had the potential for Residents 22 and 580 to administer the medications inaccurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bedside Medication Storage dated 4/2008 showed the bedside medication storage is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three closed record sampled residents (Resident 8) and/or their representative were provided with the written information regarding the facility's bed-hold policy when the resident was transferred to the acute care hospital. This failure had the potential for Resident 8 and/or their representative to be unaware of their rights to request a bed hold and return to the first available bed should the resident's hospital stay exceed the seven-day bed-hold period. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bed-Holds and Returns revised 3/2017 showed prior to transfer or therapeutic leave, the residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. Closed medical record review for Resident 8 was initiated on 11/15/23. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and transferred to the acute care hospital on [DATE]. Review of the Resident 8's Progress Note showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of the 12 final sampled residents (Resident 332). * The facility failed to implement the plan of care to provide the padded side rails for Resident 332. This failure posed the risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to Resident 332. Findings: On 11/14/23 at 0901 hours, and 11/16/23 at 1400, 1411, and 1430 hours, Resident 332 was observed lying in bed with a right side hand assist rail elevated. The hand assist rail was not padded. Medical record review for Resident 332 was initiated on 11/14/23. Resident 332 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 332's Order Summary Report showed the following physician's orders: - On 11/9/23, to administer lacosamide (antiseizure medication) 100 mg 1/2 tablet by mouth two times a day; and - On 11/14/23, to use the right hand-assist rails for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide the individualized and ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests of one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 6). * The facility failed to provide activities for Resident 6 to meet the resident's identified interests. Resident 6 was provided with the children's coloring page, connect the dot activity sheet, and [NAME] sheet. This failure had the potential for Resident 6 to experience feelings of social isolation and frustration. Findings: On 11/14/23 at 1051 hours, Resident 6 was observed sitting in the activity room. When asked about the activities provided by the facility, Resident 6 stated the activities provided to her and the residents in the facility were for children. Resident 6 stated she was provided with children's coloring pages, and she wanted more productive activities. Medical record review for Resident 6 was initiated on 11/14/23. Resident 6 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of the neurological status was conducted after a fall with head injury for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 17). This failure had the potential for Resident 17 to not receive the necessary care and services. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Falls Management Program revised 2019 showed the facility is to provide residents with hazard free environment, adequate supervision, and reduce risk factors leading to falls and injury. Further review of the the P&P showed neuro check will be initiated by the licensed nurse for unwitnessed fall and when there was identified head injury. Review of the facility's document titled Neurological Evaluation Flowsheet revised 11/2011 showed the following frequency to perform the neuro checks: - Every 15 minutes times for 1 hour; - Every 30 minutes for 2 hours; - Every 1 hour for 2 hours; and, - Every shift for 72 hours. Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care for two of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 1 and 581). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's nebulizer mask (a mask connected to a nebulizer machine used to deliver a liquid/ solution medication via inhalation directly into the lungs) was stored in the set-up bag when not in use and changed weekly as per the facility's P&P. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's nasal cannula tubing was stored in the set-up bag when not in use as per the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 581 received oxygen as ordered. These failures had the potential for these residents to not receive appropriate respiratory care, and for increased risks of infection and respiratory distress. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection revised November 2011. under the Infection Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, * The facility failed to ensure the narcotic disposition bin was securely locked and sealed. Furthermore, the narcotic disposition bin included whole pills of disposed controlled medications not fully dissolved. * The facility failed to ensure the controlled medications signed out of the controlled medication report was accurately reflected on the eMAR for one nonsampled resident (Residents 9). * The facility failed to ensure LVN 1 administered albuterol-ipratropium solution as ordered for one of 12 final smapled residents (Resident 1). These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Controlled Medication Disposal dated 1/2013 showed Schedule II-V controlled substances remaining in the facility after a resident has been discharged , or the order discontinued, are disposed of in the facility by the Director of Nursing or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 17) was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (any drug that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior). * The facility failed to ensure nonpharmacological interventions were implemented for depression behaviors exhibited by Resident 17. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for receiving unnecessary medications and increased risk of serious medication adverse reactions. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Use of Psychotropic Medication use dated 6/2021 showed in part, a psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior, which includes but is not limited to antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, and antidepressants . Facility should involve the resident or the resident's representative(s) in the discussion of potential no-drug and medication interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to store medications, biologicals, and medical supplies in a safe manner. The facility also failed to replace three of four E-Kits (emergency medications in a portable sealed containers) within 72 hours of opening as required by the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to ensure the expired medications and medical supplies were not available for resident use. This failure had the potential for the outdated medications and medical supplies to be accidentally administered and/or used and the IV medical supplies not maintaining sterility (free from germs). * The facility failed to replace the IV, controlled medication, and oral E-kits within 72 hours of opening the kits. These failures had the potential for the medications not to be available when needed for the residents, resulting in poor resident outcomes. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Storage of Medications dated 4/2008 showed outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the following: 1. Federal regulations related to the oversight of food service operations were followed when the facility did not employ of a full-time qualified individual, defined as 35 hours per week, to manage and oversee food operation services for the skilled nursing facility. 2. The Certified Dietary Manager who was responsible to oversee the main kitchen which produced food for the skilled nursing facility was competent in managing the day-to-day functions of the food services department. Failure to employ staff with the skills and abilities to effectively implement departmental processes in accordance with standards of practice, may jeopardize the health and well-being of the 33 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's matrix showed 33 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. 1. According to the California Code, Health, and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4: A licensed health facility shall employ a full-time, part-time, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document, and P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff had the skill set necessary to safely perform manual dishwashing in the event of an emergency when one of one diet aides was not competent to describe or demonstrate the manual dishwashing process used in an emergency. This failure had the potential for resident dishes to not be washed correctly in an emergency which could lead to sanitation concerns. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled How to Clean and Sanitize Pots, Pans, Utensils, and Dishes dated 2019 showed 1) Fill appropriate temperature water to fill lines. Add appropriate amount of detergent and sanitizer. Test and record on Pot and Pan Litmus Test Log. Scrape and flush out food particles. 2) Wash with detergent (100-120 degrees F). Change water every 30 minutes. 3) Rinse (110-120 degrees F). Change water frequently. 4) Sanitize - test with appropriate litmus test strips and leave in sanitizing solution for appropriate contact time. 5) Air dry - do not towel, inspect, and store dry. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food items brought to the facility for the residents were stored or reheated for future resident consumption; and failed to ensure education was provided to staff and family/visitor regarding safe handling of the food brought into the facility. These failures had the potential to limit the residents' rights and enjoyment of food brought in by the family or visitors. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled San [NAME] Hills Foods Brought by family/Visitors Policy revised 10/23 showed (6) Perishable foods will not be stored in facility. Perishable foods can be brought in by family members and checked by nursing and can be used by residents on that meal; the leftover will be discarded after two hours. On 11/16/23 at 0840 hours, an interview was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 stated when family or visitors brought in outside food, the staff would check the food to ensure appropriate diet. LVN 1 stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to monitor and address the use of antibiotics when the resident's condition did not meet McGeer's criteria (a set of specific definitions to identify true infections in long term nursing facilities) for one of four nonsampled residents (Resident 632). This failure had the potential for antibiotics to be used when it was not indicated and the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Antibiotic Stewardship- Order for Antibiotics dated December 2016 showed appropriate use of antibiotic included criteria met for clinical definition of active infection or suspected sepsis and pathogen susceptibility, based on culture and sensitivity, to antimicrobial (or therapy begun while culture is pending). Review of the facility's P&P titled Antibiotic Stewardship- Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcome revised December 2016 showed the IP or designee, will review antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the essential equipment were maintained in safe operating condition when: * Two ice machines were not cleaned and/or sanitized as per the manufacturer's guidelines. * The [NAME] dishwashing machine temperature was not monitored as per the dishwashing machine and facility P&P guidelines; and the temperature dial for the dishwashing machine failed to accurately measure the water temperature. These failures had the potential for equipment to not function in the way they were intended to. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Ice Machine Cleaning Procedures dated 2018 showed to clean inside of the ice machine with a sanitizing agent per the manufacturer's instructions. Review of the Hoshizaki America, INC Low-Profile Modular Crescent Cuber Cleaning and Sanitizing Instructions dated 8/19/13, showed for sanitizing: dilute a 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution (chlorine bleach) with warm water .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' entrapment assessments were accurate and complete, and the measurements were recorded during the bed inspection when identifying areas of possible entrapment with the use of bed rails for all three residents with side rails. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death. Findings: According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Patient entrapments may result in deaths and serious injuries. These entrapment events have occurred in openings within the bed rails, between the bed rails and mattresses, under bed rails, between split rails, and between the bed rails and head or foot boards. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-05-26 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the DHPPD nurse staffing forms were accurate and posted daily. * The facility failed to ensure the DHPPD staffing information was posted daily on 5/22 and 5/26/26, and failed to complete and obtain required signatures on the forms dated 5/20 and 5/22/26. These failures had the potential to result in inaccurate staffing information provided to the public.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers revised 7/2016 showed the facility will post on a daily basis for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. The P&P further showed within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed Nurses (RNs, LVNs) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (CNAs) directly responsible for resident care will be posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) and in a clear and readable format. Directly responsible for resident care means that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the reasonable accommodations to meet the needs of one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 62). * The facility failed to ensure the call light for Residents 62 was within the residents' reach. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response dated 10/2025 showed the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Staff should facilitate call light placement within reach of resident and secure it as needed. Call system should be accessible to Residents while in bed or other sleeping accommodations in room. During the initial tour of the facility on 1/20/26 at 0912 hours, Resident 62 was in bed, awake, and covered with a blanket. Resident 62 did not answer when asked if she knew…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to dispose and store trash in a sanitary manner. * One of four dumpsters was overflowing with garbage which prevented the lid to be fully closed. This failure posed the risk for the development of odors, attract and harborage or breeding place of insects and rodents, and a possible source of contamination of food, equipment, and utensils.Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022, 5-501.113, Covering Receptacles, showed receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnable shall be kept covered: Inside the food establishment if the receptacles and units contain food residue and are not in continuous use; or after they are filled; and with tight-fitting lids or doors if kept outside the food establishment. Review of the facility's P&P titled Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal revised 10/2017 under the Policy Interpretation and Implementation section, showed all garbage and refuse containers are provided with tight-fitting lids or covers and must be kept covered when stored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan reflected the individual care needs for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 1's change of condition when Resident 1 had nausea/vomiting and diarrhea (frequent, loose, or watery stools). This failure posed the risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and resident-centered care to the resident.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised 12/2016 showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. The interdisciplinary team must review and update the care plan: when there has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised to reflected the individual care needs for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to develop a different interventions in Resident 1's care plan to prevent constipation. This failure posed the risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and resident-centered care to the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised 12/2016 showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. The interdisciplinary team must review and update the care plan: when there has been a significant change in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately maintained for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1 had a blood sugar level of 58 mg/dL. There was no documentation a COC was initiated for the blood sugar level of 58 mg/dL. Additionally, there was no documentation the resident's representative was notified of the low blood sugar. * Resident 1's vital signs were documented as taken after the resident had already been discharged from the facility. These failures had the potential for not providing the necessary care and services due to incomplete medical record information. Findings: Review of the facility P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised 7/2017 showed the following: 1. Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. 2. The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: a. Objective observations;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-11-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an equal access to nutritional services for one nonsampled resident (Resident 25). This failure posed the risk of the resident's rights not being honored. Findings: On 11/12/24, medical record review for Resident 25 was initiated. Resident 25 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 25's admitting diagnoses included dementia and chronic kidney disease. During a lunch meal observation on 11/12/24 at 1215 hours, Resident 25 was observed asking multiple staff on multiple times about getting her lunch meal tray. All residents in the dining room were observed being served their meals at 1215 hours. Resident 25 was observed waiting 40 minutes for her lunch meal tray to be delivered and served while other residents were observed already eating their meals. Review of a posted sign for meal times showed the lunch was to be served to all residents at 1215 hours. Review of the facility's PCC list of diets for the residents failed to show…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-11-15 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure two final sampled residents (Residents 132 and 285) and four nonsampled residents (Residents 2, 26, 135, and 436) who attended the resident council meeting were informed of their rights and given information on how to formally complain to the State Agency about the care they received. This failure posed the risk of the residents and/or their legal representatives to not receive the necessary services. Findings: On 11/13/24 at 1016 hours, a resident council meeting was conducted with six residents, Residents 2, 26, 132, 135, 285, and 436. They stated they did not know the contact information for the State Licensing and Certification Office and were not provided with the information on how to formally complain to the State Agency about the care they received. The residents stated if they wanted to file a grievance or complaint, they just talked to the nurses. On 11/13/24 at 1441 hours, an interview was conducted with the Activity Director. The Activity Director verified she had not provided the residents on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 132) attained and maintained their highest practicable physical well-being. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 132's physician's order to discontinue the use of sling for the right shoulder was carried out. This failure created the risk of not providing appropriate and consistent care to the resident. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 132 was initiated on 11/12/24. Resident 132 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 132's Internal Medicine H&P/Progress Notes dated 10/30/24, showed the resident had fluctuating capacity. Review of Resident 132's medical record showed a physician's order dated 10/29/24, may use sling on the RUE. On 11/12/24 at 0814 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 132 was observed wearing a sling on her right arm. On 11/15/24 at 1547 hours, an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurately documented for one of 14 final sampled resident (Resident 132). This failure had the potential for the residents' care needs not being met as their medical information was inaccurate. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 132 was initiated on 11/12/24. Resident 132 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 132's H&P examination dated 10/30/24, showed the resident had a fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. Resident 132 has a diagnosis of right humerus (long bone in the upper arm that runs from the shoulder to the elbow) fracture. Review of Residents 132's MDS dated [DATE], showed a BIMS score of 9 (meaning moderately cognitive impaired). During an initial tour of the facility on 11/12/24 at 0814 hours, a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 132 was conducted. Resident 132 was observed lying in his bed with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were maintained in the facility's laundry room area when employee personal belongings were observed in the clean linen area. This failure posed the risk of contamination of clean linen, transmission of disease-causing microorganisms and infections. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Departmental (Environmental Services)- Laundry and Linen revised January 2014 showed the facility will provide a process for a safe and aseptic handling, washing and storage of linen. Clean linen will remain hygienically clean (free of pathogens in sufficient numbers to cause human illness), through measures designed to protect it from environmental contamination, such as covering clean linen carts. On 11/16/23 at 1015 hours, an observation of the laundry area and concurrent interview was conducted with the Housekeeping Supervisor/Maintenance Director. A partially torn paper box of miscellaneous employee personal items was observed in the clean linen folding table and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASRV LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/03/2021 |
| ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/03/2021 |
| SACC LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/03/2021 |
| BRADSHAW, JEFFREY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| BRADSHAW, PETER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/07/2023 |
| BRADY, VERN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| CASE, RYAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| ELSNER, ERIC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/03/2021 |
| KIRKWOOD, JARED | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/03/2021 |
| ORGILL, CRAIG | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/03/2021 |
| PARTI, RAJESH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/03/2021 |
| PARTI, SHRUTY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/03/2021 |
| PAXMAN, MARCUS | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| CASLMON, TIMOTHY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| THOMPSON, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| NORDFELT, SPENCER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/03/2022 |
| STA ANA, LANIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| ASPEN HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| EAST WEST BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/06/2020 |
| GUU, HUAN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2009 |
| JURADO, FRANK | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $547K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the California Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555763. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.