University Post-Acute Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 300 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 149 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.78 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 54.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.29 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.36 to 1.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans (a summary of a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) were developed for three of 19 sampled residents (Resident 14, Resident 17, and Resident 27) when: 1. Resident 14 had no anticoagulant (a medicine that help prevent blood clots) monitoring care plan; 2. Resident 17 had no bed alarm and wheelchair alarm (pads that contains sensors that trigger an alarm when they detect a change in pressure) monitoring care plan; and, 3. Resident 27 had no bed alarm monitoring care plan. These failures had the potential to result in inaccurate and inadequate care being provided to Resident 14, 17, and 27. Findings: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in late 2024 with diagnoses which included heart failure and history of blood clots. During a review of Resident 14's Order Summary Report [OSR], dated 5/21/25, the OSR indicated, Apixaban .[an anticoagulant medication used to decrease the clotting ability of blood and prevents harmful clots]. Give 1 by mouth two times daily for DVT…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication rate did not exceed 5% (percent, unit of measure) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 302 and Resident 40). 1. For Resident 302, a Licensed Nurse (LN) did not administer resident's lidocaine patch (medication patch used to treat pain) 5 % as it was prescribed by the doctor. 2. For Resident 40, an LN did not administer resident's finasteride (hazardous medication used to treat an enlarged prostrate) 5 mg (milligram, unit of measure) as prescribed by the doctor. These failure resulted in a medication error rate of 6.45 % with two errors occurring out of 31 opportunities during the observation of medication administration. Findings: 1. During an observation of medication administration on 5/19/25 at 8:43 a.m., LN 4 was observed to prepare and administer Resident 302's morning medications which included two lidocaine 5% patches. The two patches were applied on Resident 302's lower back. Reconciliation of the observed medication administration for Resident 302's current Physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly, when: 1. The medication refrigerator temperature was out of range in the medication room which put medication requiring specific temperature at risk of degradation, 2. Resident 36's opened inhaler (used to administer medication by breathing in) in the medication cart 1 was not dated when opened, which put Resident 36 at risk of receiving ineffective expired or outdated medication, 3. An opened, undated multidose container of glucose test strip was found in medication cart 1, which had the potential risk of using expired, or inaccurate glucose test strips to monitor resident's blood glucose levels. These failures had the potential to result in ineffective medication therapy for residents receiving medications stored in the medication refrigerator, for Resident 36 and for residents using glucose test strips from the medication cart 1. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide alternative meal options of similar protein/calorie value to the meal entrée when grilled cheese sandwich or cheese quesadilla were provided in place of the entree. This failure had the potential of leading to protein/calorie malnutrition for those choosing these alternatives for census of 50. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 5/19/25 at 8:15 a.m., the alternative menu was observed hanging in the kitchen over the preparation counter. This menu included the option of a grilled cheese sandwich as an alternate meal. During an observation of the lunch meal plating on 5/20/25 at 12:10 p.m., a cheese quesadilla was prepared as an alternative to the main entrée. Later two grilled cheese sandwiches were also prepared and given instead of the entree. One cheese sandwich was for a resident who requested no pork or chicken. The sandwich was made with two slices of bread and one slice of cheese. The quesadilla was made with two corn tortillas and one-fourth cup shredded cheese, the equivalent of two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Sanitation was compromised by rust-colored stains under the hand wash sink, and there were unpainted patches on several walls in kitchen and dry storage, 2. Food items were found with incomplete labeling, 3. Expired foods were found in the reach-in refrigerator, 4. A wet steam table pan was found stored wet, 5. Dumpster lid was propped open on two difference occasions, and 6. Tuna salad made from room temperature tuna was not monitored and cool-down to 41 degrees F (Fahrenheit, a unit of measure). These failures had the potential to lead to the growth of microorganisms (bacteria, virus, or fungus) and foodborne illness for the 50 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 5/19/25 at 8:15 a.m., rust-colored stains were noted under the hand washing sink and unpainted patches were seen on several walls in the kitchen and dry storage areas. During a concurrent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control policies for three sampled residents (Resident 12, Resident 24, and Resident 38) out of a census of 50 when: 1. Staff did not wear a gown when providing high contact care to one resident (Resident 12) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (an infection control strategy used in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistance organisms) nor did staff wash hands or change gloves between residents' care (Resident 12 and Resident 38); and, 2. Resident 24's oxygen tubing was not labeled with a start date. These failures had the increased potential to spread of infection for the residents in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident 38 was admitted to the facility early 2025 with diagnoses which included infection of spine hardware, respiratory failure, pneumonia, and bacterial infection resistant to common antibiotics. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility early 2025 with diagnoses which included brain dysfunction, inadequate control of blood sugars, kidney failure, thyroid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 8) when Resident 8's oxygen order was not implemented according to physician orders. This failure had the potential to result in respiratory failure (low oxygen levels in the blood and difficulty breathing) for Resident 8. Findings: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in May of 2024 with medical diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and pneumonia. Resident 8 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 10 out of 15 which indicated Resident 8 was moderately impaired in cognitive function. Review of physician orders indicated Resident 8 had a physician order for, O2 @ 2L per minute via NC every shift for SOB (oxygen at two liters per minute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for one of 50 residents when two controlled drug record forms (count sheet forms for medication that may be abused or cause addiction) were not accurately completed for Resident 12. This failure had the potential in diversion of the Resident's 12 controlled medications and increased risk of medication error. Findings: During an inspection of medication cart 1 on 5/19/25 at 3:33 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), two controlled drug count sheets were identified to have inaccurate counts for Resident 12's buprenorphine patch (a medication patch delivers opioid through the skin to control chronic pain) 10 mcg/hr (microgram per hour, unit of measure). During an interview on 5/19/25 at 3:33 p.m. with LN 2, LN 2 stated a buprenorphine patch was given to Resident 12 on 5/18/25 at 9 a.m.; however, it was inaccurately documented on the wrong count sheet for the wrong prescription count sheet. LN 2 acknowledged because of this error both count sheets had incorrect counts on them…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safely administer medications according to professional standards of care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when staff at day program administered Resident 1's noon medications twice. This failure increased Resident 1's potential to develop adverse effects from medications. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures), parkinsonism (a clinical syndrome characterized by motor symptoms that mimic Parkinson's disease. Symptoms include involuntary shaking, muscle stiffness, slow movements, and difficulty with balance and coordination.), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD- common condition in which the stomach contents move up into the esophagus). During an interview on 3/10/25 at 12:33 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated Resident 1 attended a social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and documentation review, the facility failed to discard expired medications and medications with no expiration dates, for a census of 58 when, expired medications were mixed with non-expired medications, available for use, in the medication storage room. This failure increased the potential for medication errors and placed the residents at risk for ineffective drug therapy. Findings: During the medication storage room check on 6/4/24 starting at 3:30 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN 3), there were three one oz (ounce, a unit of weight, 28.4 gram) tubes of ointment, TRIPLE ANTIBIOTIC+PAIN RELIEF that were expired and mixed with other non-expired antibiotic ointments in a basket. The expiration date was 1/24. In the medication room, there were three 40 oz Calmoseptine® with Menthol 0.44%, zinc oxide 20.6% (an ointment) to treat and prevent minor skin irritations were available for use with no expiration dates. Review of the facility's April 2008 policy and procedure, Medication Storage in the Facility, stipulated, Outdated .are immediately removed from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $655K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA