Advanced Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the failed to maintain a home-like environment for fourteen rooms (# 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 14, 20, 32,33, 37, 48, 50, 54, 55, 62) out of fifty rooms sampled.Findings included: During a facility tour conducted throughout the facility starting at 10/15/2025 at 9:40 A.M., the following environmental concerns were observed:room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with missing paint on the walls, and the bed had a reddish-yellowish-brown flaky coating of oxidizations on the metal frame. The same stained coloring was observed on the floors in the room.In room [ROOM NUMBER] the toilet was observed without sealant round the base of the toilet, missing paint from the frame of the bathroom door area, and the beds were with reddish-yellowish-brown flaky coating of oxidizations on the metal frame. One of the beds were noted with a broken side rail. One bedside table was observed with the edging detached from the table. room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed with holes in the wallsroom [ROOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-23 · tag F0635 — pattern
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews the facility did not ensure two residents (#1 and #2) out of four residents reviewed had physician orders to ensure the residents received necessary care and services upon admission.Findings included: 1.) An interview was conducted on 10/15/2025 at 10:06 a.m. with the resident representative (RR) for Resident #1. The RR said the resident had been discharged from the facility and was in the hospital for an issue with a foot wound. The RR said she had concerns about the facility not giving Resident #1 insulin when he was initially admitted to the facility. She said the resident finally received insulin, but only half of his normal dose. The RR said she had spoken to the nurse assigned to Resident #1 about her concerns. The RR said the resident also informed the nurse he was supposed to be on insulin his first day in the facility and asked about his insulin multiple times and filed a grievance.Review of admission Records showed Resident #1 was admitted from the hospital on 9/24/25 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with foot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and records review facility did not ensure residents received necessary prescribed medications upon admission for two residents (#1, #2) out of four residents reviewed. Findings included: 1.) An interview was conducted on 10/15/2025 at 10:06 a.m. with the resident representative (RR) for Resident #1. The RR said the resident had been discharged from the facility and was in the hospital for an issue with a foot wound. The RR said she had concerns about the facility not giving Resident #1 insulin when he was initially admitted to the facility. She said the resident finally received insulin, but only half of his normal dose. The RR said she had spoken to the nurse assigned to Resident #1 about her concerns. The RR said the resident also informed the nurse he was supposed to be on insulin his first day in the facility and asked about his insulin multiple times and filed a grievance.Review of admission Records showed Resident #1 was admitted from the hospital on 9/24/25 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, type 2 diabetes with other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin, related to bruising on one resident (#3) of three sampled residents.Findings included: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included but not limited to osteoarthritis of knee, disorders of brain, neutropenia, osteoarthritis of both knees, spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy of the lumbar region, epilepsy, disc degeneration of lumbar region with back pain and anemia. Review of the current physician orders showed Aspirin 81 mg (milligrams) at bedtime for DVT (deep vein thrombosis) prophylaxis since 09/24/25Review of the Nursing PRN Skin Check dated 10/17/25 showed resident skin intact. No skin impairments noted at this time, full body check performed by this nurse with husband at bedside.Review of a nursing daily skilled note dated 10/13/25 showed skin was warm/dry. No surgical wound noted. No open wound noted.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure referral for urology consultation/evaluation was provided for one resident (#5) of three residents sampled.Findings Included: Review of an admission Record dated 10/23/2025 revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified, infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, subsequent encounter, chronic kidney disease, stage 3A. Review of an order summary dated 10/23/2025 showed:Consult Urology for urinary retention, verbal active order, dated 10/23/2025. Review of a progress note dated 10/08/2025 created by Staff G, Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) noted to start a voiding trial on Resident #5. If voiding trial fails reinsert indwelling foley and consult urology. Review of a progress note dated 10/13/2025 created by Staff G, ARNP showed Staff G gave verbal orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnoses and failed to resubmit for a PASRR Level II review for five residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #98, Resident #46, and Resident #38) of 10 residents sampled for PASRRs. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed an original admission date of 8/5/09 and a readmission date of 12/17/22. Review showed the resident had the following diagnoses listed: - Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type dated 1/24/24. - Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with psychotic disturbance dated 5/11/23. - Epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus dated 10/14/15. - Major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified dated 10/1/15. - Unspecified mood [affective] disorder dated 10/1/15. - Anxiety disorder, unspecified dated 09/10/15. - Unspecified intellectual disabilities dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following identification of qualifying mental health diagnoses for three residents (Resident #36, Resident #102, and Resident #53) of 10 residents sampled for PASRRs. Findings included: Review of Resident #36's admission Record revealed an admission date of 5/2/24. Review showed the resident had newly acquired diagnoses of major depressive disorder, dated 9/10/24 and Alzheimer's disease, dated 5/3/24. Review of a Level I PASRR for Resident #36 dated 5/3/24 revealed a blank PASARR and the qualifying diagnoses were not checked. Review of admission Records showed Resident #102 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder with anxiety, major depressive disorder, and mood (affective) disorder. Review of Resident #102's PASRR Level I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner in three Zones (Zones 3, 6, and 8) out of eight facility Zones. Findings included: 1. During a facility tour of Zone 6/8 on 12/16/24 10:58 a.m. the following observations were made: - The nursing station front was covered in a textured paper, the paper had white and black stains, and a piece of trim was being held on by silver tape. - The bathroom connected to room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a black ring of dirt and debris around the base of the toilet, with no caulking. The call light cord and the wall in the bathroom was also splattered with a brown substance. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall, baseboard, and floor had dried liquid splattered on them. The door bed had a brown substance on the footboard. - The bathroom connected to room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have black marks and stains on the floor, a black ring, and cracked caulk around the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a written Notice of Transfer and/or Discharge Notice was issued in writing for one resident (Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for transfer/discharge process and failed to ensure a thirty (30) day Notice of Discharge was provided one resident (Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for transfer/discharge process. Findings included: Review of Resident #94's admission Record showed Resident # 94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident # 94's Consent to Treat, dated 10/19/24, revealed verbal consent for treatment was received from Resident #94's Emergency Contact. Review of Resident #94's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Assessment, dated 10/19/24, showed a BIMS score of 6/15, indicating severe cognitive impairment and impaired insight and judgement. Review of Resident # 94's Social Services Notes, dated 10/21/24 at 3:03 PM, revealed Resident #94's memory is impaired related to cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was accurately coded for two residents (Resident #46 and Resident #38) of four residents sampled for accuracy of assessments. Findings included: Review of Resident #46's admission Record revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of adjustment disorder with depressed mood, generalized anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #46's Florida Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II Determination Summary Report dated 3/13/2019 revealed, Resident #46 meets the definition of Serious Mental Illness, appropriate for nursing facility placement, and does not require specialized services. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/10/2024 revealed under Section A - Identification Information,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL