South Campus Care Center And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 121 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform the resident representative of discharge for one (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's census data showed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the payor source hospice respite private. Review of Resident #2's Discharge Return not Anticipated minimum data assessment, dated 3/21/2026, showed Resident #2's cognitive summary score to be 7 [severe problems with memory and thinking]. Review of Resident #2's admission record showed his spouse was listed as emergency contact #1 and diagnoses that included vascular dementia with agitation. Review of Resident #2's progress note, dated 3/19/2026, read Patient admitted for a 5-day respite stay through [Name of Hospice Provider] with a diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. Resident is A&Ox2 [alert and oriented times 2]. Review of the facility grievances showed Resident #2's spouse filed a grievance with the facility on 3/21/2026 that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a homelike physical environment when access to the pull cords for the lighting fixtures behind the resident's beds were unavailable for residents for one of three hallways.Findings include: During an interview on 1/5/2026 at 9:40 AM, Resident #128 stated, Since I have been here, I cannot turn on my over-the-bed light because there is no string to pull. It has been like this since I was admitted . I have told nursing. During an observation on 1/5/26 at 9:40 AM, the light was off behind Resident #128's bed and there was no cord attached to the pull chain that would enable the resident to turn the light on himself. During an interview on 1/5/26 at 10:45 AM, Resident #125 stated, 'The environment needs repair. I cannot access the light cord behind the bed.During an observation on 1/5/26 at 10:45 AM, the light cord for light behind Resident #125's bed was not long enough for her to control the light.During an interview on 1/6/26 at 8:30 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident # 0) of 8 residents reviewed. Findings include:During an interview on 1/5/2025 at 11:08 AM, Resident #50 stated, The port was when I was getting chemotherapy.During an observation on 1/5/2026 at 11:08 AM, Resident #50 had a venous access port (a small, implanted device placed under the skin to provide long term access to a vein for medications, fluids, and blood draws) near her left shoulder with a dressing covering it. The dressing is dated 12/5/2025. Photographic evidence obtained on 1/5/2025 at 11:08 AM. During record review of Resident #50's resident centered plan of care, there is no care plan for Resident #50's venous access port.During interview on 1/7/2026 at 10:10 AM, [NAME] Unit Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, I do not see a care plan for the resident for her access port. There should have been a plan of care for her venous access port.Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living, receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming and clean clothing for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for activities of daily living.Findings include:On 1/5/26 at 11:04 AM, Resident #33 was observed in a visibly soiled jacket and pants, facial hair unkept in appearance and had a sour body odor. Resident was pleasantly confused, standing at the doorway to his room.On 1/6/26 at 9:58 AM, Resident #33 was observed in the same visibly soiled jacket and pants, partially fallen due to missing belt loops, facial hair unkept in appearance, and a foul/sour body odor. Resident is observed standing in the hallway next to the door of his room.On 1/7/26 at 8:52 AM, Resident #33 was observed in the same visibly soiled jacket and pants, partially fallen due to missing belt loops, facial hair unkept in appearance, and a foul/sour body odor. Resident #33 is observed walking the hallway in the unit.Review of Resident #33's admission record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice for the care and maintenance of a venous access catheter port for 1 (Resident #50) of 2 residents reviewed.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #50, documented tunneled venous access catheter was in place for the administration of chemotherapy for cancer. During an interview on 1/5/2026 at 11:05 AM, Resident #50, stated I had the port placed for chemotherapy. They are not using it now. During an observation on 1/5/2026 at 11:05 AM, Resident #50 has a venous access port (implanted device to provide long term access for medications) near her left shoulder with a dressing covering it. The dressing is dated 12/5/2025. (Photographic evidence obtained) During an interview on 1/7/2026 at 10:10 AM, the [NAME] Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (UMLPN) stated, Our policy is an access port needs to have weekly changes of the Huber needle and dressing. The dressing should have been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 1 (Resident #117) of 3 residents reviewed for advance directives and respiratory services.Findings include:Review of the admission record for Resident #117 documented an initial admission date of 12/2/25 and a re-admission date of 1/3/26.On 1/5/25 at 10:50 AM, Resident #117 was observed wearing oxygen (O2) via nasal cannula on 2 liters with the oxygen concentrator.During an interview on 1/5/26 at 10:50 AM, Resident #117's significant other, who was at resident's bedside, stated [Resident #117's Name] was hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and was brought back to facility on Saturday after the hospital said she was stable to return. The cough has been persistent since diagnosis of RSV and has improved. [Resident #117's Name] being on oxygen is new and never [had] been on oxygen prior to this episode. On 1/6/26 at 3:24 PM, Resident #117 was observed in bed wearing O2 on 2 liters with the oxygen concentrator, resident is being repositioned by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment for 2 of 9 residents, Residents #1 and #7, reviewed for environment. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 4/29/2025 at 10:39 AM of Resident #1's room and bathroom there were tiles noted to be missing along the wall of the sink and toilet, these were located along the baseboard of the wall. The bathtub does have a rust colored discoloration near the faucet and brown staining on the tile along the wall. (Photographic evidence obtained) During an interview on 4/29/2025 at 3:20 PM the Regional Plan Operator stated, The condition of the tiles and bathtub were not acceptable and needed to be fixed. During an interview on 4/29/2025 at 3:40 PM the EVS (Environmental Services) Manager stated, The bathtub discoloration is not to his expectations for cleanliness. 2) During an observation on 4/29/2025 at 9:15 AM of Resident #7's room there was a loose baseboard with dry wall debris that spans the length of Resident #7's bed. (Photographic evidence obtained) During an interview on 4/29/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to document blood glucose levels and administration of insulin for one of 3 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for medication administration, and 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for wound care. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #1's medical record documented a medical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2. Review of the physician order dated 2/20/2025 for Resident #1 read, Insulin Lispro subcutaneous solution pen 100 unit/ml (milliliter), inject 4 units subcutaneously before meals for DM and Insulin Glargine Solostar Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 100 unit/ml, inject 15 units subcutaneously at bedtime for DM. Review of the physician order dated 2/21/2025 for Resident #1 read, Glucose monitoring before meals and at bedtime for DM. Review of the medication administration record for April 2025 for Resident #1 did not provide documentation of the administration for Insulin Lispro for April 27th at 4:30 PM, Insulin Glargine for April 27th at 9:00 PM, and did not provide documentation of Resident #1's blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, covered, labeled, or discarded in the kitchen walk-in coolers and dry storage areas and maintained standards of practice for cleaning and sanitary conditions in the dietary department. Findings included: An initial walk-through of the kitchen was conducted on 7/21/24 at 9:00 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM). An observation was made at 9:08 AM of two large full containers of cottage cheese with an expiration date of 7/14/24. An observation was made in the walk-in cooler of a large metal bowl of a fruit type mixture with no identifying label or date. An observation was made in the kitchen of a dirty cloth and a dirty metal scrubby left on the sink and not in a Santi-container or solution. An observation was made in the dish room of 3 large 5-gallon containers of chemicals for the dish machine stored on the floor. (photographic evidence obtained) An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) at 9:15 AM. The DM confirmed he observed the two large cottage cheese containers with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflect the resident's status for 1 (Resident #109) of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion and 1 (Resident #20) of 2 residents reviewed for gastrostomies. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 7/21/2024 at 10:05 AM, Resident #109 was lying in bed guarding his right arm with his left hand. During an interview on 7/21/2024 at 10:05 AM, Resident #109 was asked if he was able to move both arms without limitations, he nodded No and touched his right hand. When asked if he was able to move both lower extremities without limitation he nodded No. Review of Resident #109's admission record documented resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], documented in Section GG titled Functional Abilities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL