Lexington Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 106 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 177 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 141.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions and provide supervision to prevent accidents/injuries to residents related to: 1) failure to prevent a fall with injuries for one resident (#56) out of four residents reviewed for falls; and 2) failure to ensure a safe environment for residents to smoke for two residents (#21, #41) out of two residents who required the use of a wheelchair. Residents were expected to sign a leave of absence (LOA) form and then navigate off facility grounds, unassisted, through the parking lot approximately 350 feet, over a large speed bump, and across large potholes, despite being assessed to require supervision during ambulation or requiring the use of a wheelchair. Findings included: 1. A review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed a progress note dated 07/02/2025 at 6:35 a.m. “Resident attempted to get oob (out of bed) without assistance, found with left leg stuck inside rail and face on the floor, noted moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean, sanitary manner in one kitchen (Main) of one kitchens observed during survey.Findings included:During the initial tour of the kitchen conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 07/14/2025 from 9:59 a.m. to 10:25 a.m., concerns were identified related to the following:The filter in the juice machine was observed with dirt and debris. An immediate interview with the CDM revealed she did not know how the filters can be cleaned. She stated they would have to order new filters and the vendor would install.The juice machine equipment was observed with brown - coloring and stains on the surface of the stainless-steel surfaces. The CDM stated the surfaces are rusted and there was no way to clean them.The ceiling filters were observed with stains, dust and dirt, located above food prep and food service areas.The light by the food prep area was observed with brown stains and bio-growth.An observation was made of water leaking close to the light fixture above the food service…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for five residents (#107, #86, #18, #43 and #102) of seven residents sampled.Findings included: 1. On 07/16/2025 at 9:13 a.m. Resident #107 was observed with long fingernails and hair on her chin. She stated she would like to be assisted with trimming her nails and shaving her face. She stated she preferred her nails short and clean. She stated the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA’s) say they will help, but then they do not. Review of the admission record for Resident #107 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia. Review of Resident #107’s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed in section C the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG - showed the resident required partial/moderate assistance (Helper does…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care and prevent a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for one resident (#150) out of three residents sampled.Findings Included: During a phone interview on 07/15/2025 at 5:15 p.m., Resident #150 Family Member (FM) stated Resident #150 has been in and out of the hospital related to UTI's, multiple times. When she picks up Resident #150's laundry it is soaking wet. Maybe if they changed her more often, she would not have so many UTI's. When she goes to the hospital and they do lab work it shows E. coli [Escherichia coli] in her urine. Review of Resident #150's admission record revealed an admission date of 06/01/2022. Resident #150 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, With Other Behavioral Disturbance, Urinary Tract Infection, Site Not Specified, Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Moderate, Parkinson's Disease Without Dyskinesia, Without Mention of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by 1) failure of staff to provide appropriate incontinence care by two staff members (Staff A, Staff B); 2) failure to implement policies related to staff use of artificial fingernails and containment of long hair for two staff members (Staff K, Staff S); and 3) failure to ensure staff donned Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a contact isolation room for two staff members (Staff AA, Staff AB) out of six staff members observed. The findings included: On 7/16/25 at 9:51 AM, an observation was made of Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), providing incontinence care to Resident #7. The resident had a urinary catheter and had been incontinent of stool. The CNA was observed to use cleansing wipes to clean the resident's peri area, then using the same wipes, she cleaned the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for self-administration of enteral nutrition was completed for one resident (#125) out of one resident reviewed.Findings included:On 07/16/2025 at 1:11 p.m. Resident #125 was observed in his room administering his enteral nutrition independently into his gastrostomy tube (g-tube). The resident's head of bed was observed to be flat. Resident #125 stated the nurses give him his enteral nutrition during the scheduled meal times. He stated he self-administers the enteral nutrition into his g-tube.Review of the admission record for Resident #125 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, gastroesophageal reflux disease and gastrostomy status.Review of Resident #125's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident #125 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of serious injury of unknown source and neglect for one resident (#56) of two residents sampled.Findings included: A record review for Resident #56 revealed she had an unwitnessed fall on 07/02/2025. Review of the nursing progress note dated 07/02/2025 revealed the resident had attempted to get out of bed without assistance and was found “face on the floor” with a moderate amount of blood on her facial/nose area. The resident was transferred to a local hospital via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) where she was diagnosed with a skull fracture. The resident was care planned for falls with interventions that included “Utilize total mechanical lift with staff assist of 2 for transfers”. “Remind resident to request assistance prior to ambulation/transfers as needed”. “Keep call light within reach.” Further review of the medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include cognitive communication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify a resident and the resident's representative of a hospital transfer in writing prior to the transfer for one resident (#149) out of four residents reviewed.Findings included: During an interview on 07/14/2025 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #149 stated she just returned from a hospital stay. “The hospital wanted me to stay until Saturday, but I told them I had to be back to the facility on Friday so that my bed at the facility was not given away. I don’t remember being given anything explaining my options for holding my bed before I went to the hospital.” Review of Resident #149's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of Resident #149’s admission record revealed a readmission date of 07/11/2025 from an acute care facility. Resident #149 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority/state intellectual disability authority after a significant change in the mental or physical condition of a resident who has mental illness for one resident (#3) of nine residents reviewed.Findings included:Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record revealed an original admission date of 02/10/2021 and a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 02/08/2021 provided by the hospital pre-admission. In section 3, this is documented as a non-provisional admission, and section 4 is documented as no diagnosis or suspicion of serious mental illness or intellectual disability indicated. Level II PASRR not required. A PASRR Resident Review- Evaluation Request, dated 04/23/2023, was present with no signatures and no evidence of a level II request for evaluation from the state agency.Review of Resident #3's diagnoses list revealed a diagnosis of major depressive disorder on 10/29/2024. Further review revealed a request for a psychiatric meeting dated 10/29/2024, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement patient-centered interventions related to adaptive dining equipment to promote independence while eating per occupational therapy and physician order for one resident (#13) out of one resident reviewed. Findings included: On 07/16/2025 at 12:29 p.m. Resident #13 was observed in the room wearing a clothing protector with an opened meal tray on the overbed table in front of the resident. The resident was observed holding a regular everyday eating fork. The resident stated a staff member was supposed to get weighted silverware, but they hadn't been sending one with the meals. Review of Resident #13s admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and 02/05/2025. The record included diagnoses not limited to Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia without mention of fluctuations, unspecified convulsions, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. The resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the medical physician failed to provide the facility with written, signed and dated progress notes following each visit for one (#13) of 34 sampled residents. Findings included:On 7/14/24 at 2:54 p.m. Resident #13 was observed and interviewed in the resident room. The resident was sitting in wheelchair and answered questions appropriately. The resident reported falling two weeks ago and required stitches and a second fall while using the door to maneuver in wheelchair. Review of Resident #13s electronic progress notes and the uploaded documents revealed the most recent Palliative Care - Follow up note was written for a service performed on 2/14/25. Review of the electronic practitioner notes showed psychiatry notes. The electronic Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) notes revealed the last note was written 8/21/23. The electronic record did not include any specified MD Note and the last Physician Progress Note was dated 4/2/25 by the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation physician for a service date of 2/27/25. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-07-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL