North Lake Care Center And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 82.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 78.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to 1 of 3 sampled residents assessed as at risk for elopement. The deficient practice allowed Resident #1 to exit the facility on 10/12/24 at approximately 8:50 PM, through an unsecured door on the second floor. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, Wandering and Elopements, with a revision date of March 2019, documented, in part: The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. 1. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. Record review revealed Resident #1, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, eloped from the facility on 10/12/24 at approximately 8:40 PM. The record revealed Resident #1 was observed by an individual from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to inform the physician of a significant weight loss for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #6.The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised February 2021, revealed Except in medical emergencies, notifications will be made within twenty-four (24) hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention revised March 2022 revealed The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria 1 month -5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe. Record review revealed Resident #6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Vascular Disease.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report and resolve a grievance for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for grievances, Resident #11. The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance with activities of daily living.Record review revealed Resident #11 was care planned on 04/23/25 for self-care deficit with dressing, grooming, and bathing as evidenced by needs set up to supervision with personal care tasks due to generalized weakness, and limited endurance. An intervention included to provide staff assistance with dressing, grooming, bathing as needed. An interview was conducted with Resident #11 on 09/08/25 at 11:30 AM. Resident #11 stated he had had concerns over the the care he receives on 2nd shift (3-11 PM). The resident stated they are slow to respond to his call light, and they are rude in responding. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain labs as ordered and failed to notify the physician of the missed labs for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #54. The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate assist with activities of daily living.Review of Resident #54's orders revealed an order dated 09/03/25 for, Urinalysis with reflex to culture, CBC (Complete Blood Count) with differential, BMP (Basic Metabolic Profile) in AM [morning]. Further review of Resident #54's record revealed the urine culture, CBC, and BMP were not conducted or obtained. Further review of Resident #54's record did not reveal any indication the physician was notified of the missed labs. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/10/23 at 12:00 PM. The DON acknowledged the above. The DON further stated it was missed.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete and have dialysis communication forms post treatment for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis, Resident #3.The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had moderate cognitive deficit and required supervision for activities of daily living. The assessment further indicated the resident received dialysis. Review of Resident #3 care plan documented the resident was care planned on 08/11/25 for potential for complications related to hemodialysis for treatment of ESRD, receives dialysis on: Tuesday and Saturday. An intervention included to complete dialysis communicate tool on dialysis days and review upon return from dialysis. Review of Resident #3's Dialysis Communication Interchange forms revealed missing dialysis communication forms for 08/12/25, 08/30/25, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to appropriately reconcile controlled medications for 2 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for medication reconciliation, Resident #1 and Resident #16.The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled Controlled Substances, publication date and revision date not supplied, under the heading of Policy Interpretation and Implementation, documented, in part: Under that section is the subsection with the heading Dispensing and Reconciling Controlled Substances. Item 1 documented: Controlled substance inventory is monitored and reconciled to identify loss or potential diversion in a manner that minimizes the time between loss/diversion and detection/follow-up. Item 2 documented: The system of reconciling the receipt, dispensing, and disposition of controlled substances includes the following:Records or personnel access and usage. Medication administration records.Declining inventory records; andDestruction, waste, and return to pharmacy records. On 09/11/25 at 12:28 PM, an observation was made of the DIV 4 med…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain policies and procedures for the monthly drug regimen review that included, but are not limited to, time frames for the different steps in the process for 2 of 5 sampled residents sampled for unnecessary medications, Residents #2 and #5. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Tapering Medications and Gradual Drug Dose Reduction with a revised date of April 2025 included in part the following: Tapering/GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) may be used as an approach to finding an optimal dose or determining if continued use of a medication will benefit the resident. In addition, the staff and practitioner consider GDR under certain circumstances including when: a) the resident's clinical condition has improved or stabilized, b) the underlying causes of the original target symptoms have resolved, c) non-pharmacological interventions, including behavioral interventions, have been effective in reducing symptoms; or d) a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate behavior monitoring for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #6. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Vascular Disease.Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 06/25/25, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating an intact cognitively intact. Review of the Physician order's revealed on 09/05/25 the resident was started on Quetiapine Fumarate 25 milligrams (mg) tablet to give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for psychosis. On 09/10/25, Quetiapine Fumarate was increased to 50 mg at bedtime related to schizoaffective disorder. Review of the physician's orders revealed no behavior monitoring order for this medication since the start of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to secure medications at all times for 1 of 21 sampled residents with medications observed at the bedside, Residents #42. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications with no date included in part the following: The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner.Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administer of Medications with no date included in part the following: Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Record review for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Unspecified Adrenocortical Insufficiency, Anxiety Disorder and Unspecified Glaucoma. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to have an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for infection, Resident #54. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate assist with activities of daily living. Resident #54 had diagnoses including Dysuria (difficulty urinating) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH, enlarged prostate). Record review revealed Resident #54 was care planned for alteration in elimination as evidence by frequent incontinence of bladder and bowel, impaired mobility, and difficulty with urine stream due to diagnosis of BPH, at risk for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). Interventions included; administer medications as ordered, observe for effectiveness and for side effects, observe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services in order to maintain a clean, comfortable, sanitary and home like environment in 9 of 30 rooms and the Community Shower Room. The findings included: On 05/16/24 at approximately 2:00 PM, an environmental tour was conducted with the Director of Maintenance. The following was observed: a. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the hand washing sink in the bathroom was clogged in a manner that the basin was slow to drain. b. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the toilet was clogged and the faucet at the hand washing sink was not secured to the sink. c. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was no drain plug in the tub to allow the tub to hold water, and there was duct tape covering a screen on the sides of the window mounted air conditioning unit. d. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the basin and faucets of the tub and the were dirty and there were urinals in need of being changed. e. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the surface of the over bed table for the door…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,206 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,206 — penalty dated 2024-10-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL