Unity Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center
1404 NW 22nd Street, Miami, FL 33142 · For profit - Individual · 294 certified beds · (305) 325-1050 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.1% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.9% | 4.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.7% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.3% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.3% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.1% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.2% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 1.3% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 2.13 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.40 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.8%CMS range 19.6–60.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.1–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.6–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 294 beds and averages 259.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one out of three sampled residents as evidenced by; on 08/21/2025 at 6:22 AM Resident # 5, a newly admitted resident who is cognitively intact, exited the building undetected through the door used for the linen delivery that was left open and eventually exited the facility's grounds through the back gate. There were four residents at risk for elopement residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include.Observation on 08/22/2025 at 12:55 PM revealed the door Resident # 5 exited through has an alarm system.Review of a photograph provided by the facility's Administrator revealed Resident # 5 wearing blue short sleeved with horizontal stripes, green cargo pants, black socks and black sandals, exiting the facility at 6:22 AM through the emergency exit door that was wide open.Record review of Resident # 5's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with professional standards, as evidenced by unsecured medications observed at the bedside in one out of eight sampled residents. There were 257 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Observation on 06/23/2025, at 9:59 AM, Resident #97 was observed lying in bed, there was a bottle labeled for congestion treatment on the window ledge and an unlabeled transparent medication bottle containing an unidentified tablet at the resident's bedside. Observation on 06/23/2025, at 12:06 PM and 06/24/2025 at 2:11 PM in Resident #97's room revealed the bottle labeled for congestion treatment on the window ledge and the unlabeled transparent medication bottle containing an unidentified tablet remained on the shelf at the resident's bedside. Record review revealed Resident #97 was admitted on [DATE]; the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE] at 10:48 AM, observation of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube care for Resident #243 performed by Staff M, Registered Nurse (RN). Staff M, Registered Nurse gathered peg tube supplies, knocked on Resident #243's door provided privacy, explained the care that will be provided, provided privacy, washed hands, put on gloves, gown and face mask. Staff A removed the old peg tube dressing dated [DATE] and discarded it in a red biohazard bag, removed soiled gloves and put on a new pair of gloves; cleaned the skin around the peg site three times and discarded the soiled gauzes. Staff A, RN removed soiled gloves, put on a new pair of gloves, and applied new peg tube dressing; Staff A, RN removed the gloves, gown and face mask and discarded them in the red biohazard bag . Review of Resident #243's clinical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; medical diagnoses included but not limited to Gastronomy Status and Dysphagia. Review of Resident # 243's Physician Orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the essential patient care equipment was in safe operating condition for three out of three residents who used mechanical lifts for transfer (Residents # 25, #464, and #129). The mechanical lift used to transfer the residents who required total assistance from the bed to the chair was not working. The findings included: Observation on 02/21/2024 at 07:25 AM revealed that on the second floor there were six (6) mechanical lifts working to take care of 91 residents who were totally dependent on the equipment. On the first floor five mechanical lifts worked to take care of 71 residents who were totally dependent on the equipment. In total the facility had five mechanical lifts broken. On 02/20/2024 at 11:20 AM, during an interview with Resident #25 the resident revealed that he needs assistance to be transferred from his bed to the wheelchair and assistance is provided using the mechanical lift. He has to wait for a long time because on the first floor there are only a few mechanical lifts working for all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean environment and housekeeping services for resident's equipment (Resident #258 and Resident #158). There were 266 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include: On 02/19/2024 at 10:09 AM. It was observed that Resident #258's feeding pump had dried enteral liquid on the feeding pump and pole. (see photo evidence) On 02/19/2024 at 11:24 AM. Observation revealed Resident #182 feeding pump had dried enteral liquid and dark matter on the floor. (See photo evidence) On 02/19/2024 at 12:03 PM. In room [ROOM NUMBER], it was observed that the oxygen concentrator was on and covered with dust with no nasal cannula attached. (see photo evidence) On 02/19/2024 at 05:24 PM. In room [ROOM NUMBER], it was observed that the oxygen concentrator was on, covered with dust, and no nasal cannula tubing attached. On 02/20/2024 at 09:21 AM. It was observed that Resident #182's floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one resident (Resident # 263) out of one resident MDS assessment that was reviewed at the time of survey. There were 266 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Review of Resident #263's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/24/2023. Medical diagnosis included, but not limited to, Diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cerebral infarction. Review of Discharge Return not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was discharged to Short-term/General Hospital. Review of the Care Plan initiated on 07/07/2023 with revision dated 01/02/2024 indicated: [Resident #263] is here for long term placement due to resident/representative desire to remain in long term facility. Goal: Resident's Psychosocial needs will be met daily with assistance from staff through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide devices for an accident-free environment for one out of nine sampled residents (Resident#32). There were 266 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 02/19/2024 at 8:28 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A, Resident #32 was observed lying in bed. One floor mat was located on the right side of the bed. (see photo evidence) On 02/20/2024 at 9:18 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A, Resident #32 was observed lying in bed. One floor mat was located on the right side of bed. (see photo evidence) On 02/21/2024 at 3:03 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A, Resident #32 was observed lying in bed. One floor mat located on right side and left side of bed. Record review of demographic face sheet revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis affecting left dominant side, Seizure, and Glaucoma. Record review of Resident #32's Quarterly Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews. The facility failed to obtain physician's orders for oxygen treatment for Resident #211. This practice could affect 266 residents who were residing at the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include: On 02/19/2024 at 12:18 PM. In an observation and interview of Resident #211. It was observed that the resident was on two liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. (See photo evidence). Resident #211 stated the nurse from the night shift had changed the nasal cannula tubing earlier that morning. Observation on 02/20/2024 at 09:43 AM, revealed Resident #211 was not in the room but the nasal cannula tubing was on the bed and the oxygen concentrator was on at two liters. Record review of physician orders revealed no orders for oxygen therapy for Resident #211. On 02/21/2024 at 11:21 AM. In an interview with Staff F, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). When Staff F was asked where Resident #211 was and if the resident had physician orders for oxygen treatment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed ensure accuracy in the reconciliation in the accounting of all controlled substances for 2 out of 2 residents whose narcotic records were reviewed (Resident#150 and Resident#76). There were 262 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Observation on 02/21/2024 at 12:30 PM on the second-floor south station, cart 2. During Controlled Substance count with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN), it was revealed during the counting of the controlled substances sheet for Resident #76's, Medication: Methadone, Dosage: 5 mg (milligram) tablet; indicated on the last line of sheet that the person giving the medication: Staff D, Date: 2/20/2024, Time: 5:00PM, Amount on hand: 22, Amount given: 1, Amount remaining: 21. (see photo evidence). Review of the physical bingo card for the Methadone 5 mg for Resident #76, count was 20. Observation on 02/21/2024 at 12:32 PM on the second-floor south station cart 2. Controlled substances count with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) revealed the controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview and the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F584 Safe, Clean, Comfortable, Homelike Environment, F689 Free of Accident Hazards, Supervision, Devices, F695 Respiratory/Tracheotomy Care and Suctioning. These repeated deficiencies have the potential to affect 266 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated 11/18/2022, F584 Safe, Clean, Comfortable, Homelike Environment, F689 Free of Accident Hazards, Supervision, Devices, F695 Respiratory/Tracheotomy Care and Suctioning. were cited. Interview with Administrator and the Director of Nursing on 02/22/2024 at 01:40 PM. The Administrator and DON stated that the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meetings are held every month with the attendees are the Risk Manager, Social services, Medical Director,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedures on abuse for one (Resident #1) out of one sampled resident whose abuse report was reviewed. This facility practice had the potential to have a negative impact on the health and safety of all 263 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Review of the facility's Abuse Reporting Timeline Audit revealed an abuse of unknown injury or fracture occurred on 09/25/2023. Review of Immediate Federal Report revealed the Immediate Report was completed and filed on 09/27/2023 at 8:28 PM while the administrator was notified on 09/25/2023 at 10:30 AM. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/05/2023 at 01:55 PM, the DON confirmed that the initial report was filed about 2 days after the alleged abuse first reported. The DON stated, The procedure is to report the incident right away. I had a case where they sent the resident to the hospital without bruises or redness. After they told me there was a fracture, I did the report. It was a teachable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the resident's approved menu for the Regular diets (Resident #189 and Resident #92). This could affect all residents receiving Regular, consistency diets (145 residents). The findings included: A review of the facility's cycle menu showed that on 11/15/22, the following was provided: the Regular Diet consistency had 3 ounces of honey-glazed ham,4 ounces of red cabbage, and 4 ounces of seasoned roasted potatoes. The Diet Type Report provided by the facility showed that 145 residents are on a Regular diet consistency. In an observation conducted on 11/15/22 at 1:40 PM, Resident #189 was noted in his room with the lunch tray at his bedside. Closer observation showed a lunch meal that had the following: a slice of glazed ham, purple cabbage, and roasted potatoes. In this observation, Resident #189 stated that the ham is so small that he is not sure that it weighs 3 ounces. A chart review showed that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-11-18 · tag F0910 — widespreadEnsure resident rooms meet each resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's rooms are designed and equipped for adequate nursing care, comfort, and privacy of residents in a safe manner. Semi-private resident rooms measured under the required 80 square feet per resident and multiple residents complained to the surveyors of their rooms being cramped and cluttered. The findings included: Review of a Memo provided to the surveyors by the facility's Administrator revealed the following: 81 rooms in the facility are semi-private rooms. Of these, 58 measure 157 square feet-which equates to less than the required 80 square feet per resident. These measurements do not include the bathroom or closet storage space in the rooms. During a tour of the facility conducted on 11/16/22 at 11:00 AM, it was noted by the surveyors that a number of the facility's semi-private rooms appeared to be small. It was noted in room [ROOM NUMBER] that a wheelchair between the beds was touching the side rails of each bed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct food consistencies for the Mechanical Soft Diets for 2 of 2 residents during dining observations (Resident #10 and Resident #167). This has the potential to affect 38 residents on the Mechanical Soft diet. The findings included: A review of the facility's cycle menu showed that on 11/15/22, the following was provided: the Regular diet consistency had honey-glazed ham, red cabbage, and seasoned roasted potatoes. The Mechanical soft diet had ground honey-glazed ham, red cabbage, and mashed potatoes. The Diet Type Report provided by the facility showed that 38 residents are on a Mechanical soft consistency diet. In an observation conducted on 11/15/22 at 8:45 AM, Resident #10 was noted in the room with her breakfast tray in front of her. Closer observation showed a breakfast meal with a large piece of bread approximately 3 inches long that was untoasted and hard to the touch. It also had a ground sausage patty and scrambled eggs. The meal ticket on the tray showed that Resident #10 was on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist with resident's right to vote for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #225). The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #225 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment, dated 10/15/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact, and required extensive one-person assist with activities of daily living. An interview was conducted with Resident #225 on 11/15/22 at 12:00 PM. Resident #225 stated he had been trying to get in touch with social services for approximately two months in order to assist in voting. Resident #225 further stated he was not able to vote this past election. Resident #225 stated he was very upset, as he has not ever not voted. Resident #225 stated this needed to be fixed so as it does not happen again. A subsequent interview was conducted with Resident #225 on 11/17/22 at 9:00 AM. Resident #225 stated he had called the receptionist at the front desk several times to request…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide showers per resident request for 1 of 251 sampled residents screened in the initial pool (Resident #121). The findings included: The facility's policy titled Standards and Guidelines: SG Showers/Bathing issued 03/08/10 and revised 03/27/21 revealed It will be the standard of this facility to assure that showers/bathing are offered to residents at least 2 times weekly or per resident/representative preference unless specifically ordered otherwise by the physician or care planned otherwise. Refusals for showers/bathing should be reported to the licensed nursing staff . On 11/15/22 at 11:29 AM, Resident #121 was interviewed during the initial screening process. Resident #121 was observed in a hospital type gown, lying in bed. The resident stated that he would like to get dressed when he got out of bed. He also stated that he never got a shower. He was given a bed bath but would like a shower ideally everyday. Resident #121 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 9 out of 36 sampled residents (Residents #11, #27, #63, #105, #129, #146, #203, #255, #459). Review of the facility's policy titled Work Orders, Maintenance with no date included the following: To establish priority of maintenance service, work orders must be filled out electronically using an online application such as TELS and forward to the Maintenance Director. It shall be the responsibility of the department directors and employees to fill out and submit work orders to the Maintenance Director. Work orders are reviewed daily. Emergency or critical work orders would be called in to the Maintenance Director. Emergency requests will be given priority. On 11/15/22 at 9:54 AM an observation of vent with missing slats coated with dust across from the shower room near the 2 South Nursing Station. On 11/15/22 at 10:15 AM an observation was made in Resident # 203's room of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernail grooming (Resident #10 and Resident #94) to assist with dining (Resident #94) and failed to provide care and services to prevent a decline in the range of motion (Resident #117, Resident #231, and Resident #225) for 5 of 5 sampled residents for Activities of Daily Livings (ADLs). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled ADL Care and Assistance, revised on 03/27/21, showed that the following: each Resident will be assessed/evaluated upon admission or shortly after for their level of resident ability/function and staff assistance required to perform ADLS safely. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is an example of an assessment/evaluation of the level of resident ability/function and staff assistance required to perform ADLs. Each ADL should be provided at the level of assistance that promotes the highest practicable level of function for the Resident while ensuring the needs and desired goals.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess for safety of smoking for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #217). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy Safe Smoking, dated 10/01/2004, and revised 03/27/21, documented: Electronic vapor cigarettes will be addressed and accommodated per the same guidelines as for actual cigarettes. A safe Smoking Screen is performed on admission for a resident who wishes to smoke. Resident #217 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required limited to extensive one to two-person assist with activities of daily living. The assessment further documented the resident did not use tobacco. Record review revealed a care plan dated 11/15/22, documented Resident #217 desires to smoke. Resident has been assessed as able to smoke independently. A review of a Smoking Evaluation form dated 11/14/22 revealed the document was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to assess for removal of indwelling urinary catheter when clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is not necessary for 1 of 2 sampled resident for indwelling urinary catheter (Resident #212 and #194). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Standards and Guidelines: SG (Standards and Guidelines) Indwelling Catheters, with a revised date of 03/27/21, included the following: It will be the standard of this facility to provide appropriate documentation for use and care for indwelling catheters of the resident's that have the indication for use beyond 14 days. Under Guidelines included: 1. Indication for Indwelling Catheter use: Urinary retention that cannot be treated or corrected medically or surgically, for which alternative therapy is not feasible. Contamination of Stage III or IV pressure ulcers (or greater) with urine which has impeded healing. Terminal illness or severe impairment, which makes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional assessments in a timely manner and failed to ensure the accuracy of admission/monthly weights for 4 of 8 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #94, Resident #40, Resident #128, and Resident #54). The findings included: 1. In an observation conducted on 11/15/22 at 1:07 PM, the lunch tray arrived for Resident #94 and was placed on her side table. Staff left the tray at the bedside and walked out to help pass other lunch trays. At 1:15 PM, Resident #94's tray was about 5% consumed, and no staff was noted in the room assisting her with the lunch meal. Continued observation at 1:29 PM showed that Resident #94's tray was left 95% untouched. In an observation conducted on 11/16/22 at 9:40 AM, Resident #94 was noted in her room with the breakfast tray in front of her. She was observed eating one tablespoon of the eggs, but everything else on the tray was untouched. The closer observation did not show any staff in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide proper tracheostomy care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care, Resident #212. The findings included: Review of the facility's written procedure titled Trach Care Competency Check List, undated, revealed the following: Apply sterile gloves. The dominant hand will remain sterile. With non-dominant hand, remove oxygen source. Then unlock and remove inner cannula. Place tracheostomy collar over outer cannula. Quickly clean the inside and outside of the inner cannula with brush. With sterile gloved hand, replace inner cannula and lock in place. Replace tracheostomy collar. Observation of tracheostomy care on 11/18/22 at 10:10 AM for Resident #212. The surveyor obtained consent from the resident prior to the start of tracheostomy care. The staff members involved in Resident #212's tracheostomy care were Staff L, Respiratory Therapist, Staff M, Respiratory Therapist, and Staff N, Respiratory Nurse. The surveyor asked Staff L who normally performs tracheostomy care and respiratory medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines as per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations during the disconnection of dialysis treatment for 1 of 1 Resident Observed during dialysis (Resident #8). The findings included: A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations, titled Core Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Safe Healthcare Delivery in All Settings, Showed the following: Use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient, before performing an aseptic task (e.g., placing an indwelling device) or handling invasive medical devices. Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient, after touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment, after contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces, and immediately after glove removal.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to secure unattended medications in the medication refrigerator for 1 out of 8 nursing stations, the facility failed to properly secure medication and treatment carts for 2 out of 16 carts, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of medications during 1 medication administration observation. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Standards and Guidelines: Medication Storage, revised 10/24/22, revealed the following: The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications, drugs or biologicals. Compartments containing medications, drugs, and biologicals shall be locked when not in use and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unlocked if out of a nurse's view. Medications will be destroyed following FDA, State and Local requirements. Review of the facility's policy titled Standards and Guidelines: Medication Documentation, revised 03/03/21, revealed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to honor the residents food preferences, and food intolerances for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for foods (Resident #189, Resident #192, and Resident #100). The findings included: In an observation conducted on 11/15/22 at 9:00 AM, Resident #189 was in the room when his breakfast tray arrived. The tray was noted with over easy-cooked eggs, sausage patty, and a large piece of bread approximately 3 inches long. Closer observation showed a Regular carton of 2% milk and 8 ounces of juice. The meal ticket on the tray showed that Resident #189 was lactose intolerant and liked Sunnyside-up eggs. In this observation, Resident #189 stated that he did not like how they cooked his eggs and wanted his eggs sunny side up. He pointed to the Regular milk and said that he was lactose intolerant and that they always make a mistake and bring him Regular milk. He then picked up the large piece of bread on his tray and said, see, it is hard as a rock. In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain food safety requirements with storage, preparation, and distribution in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, which included: failure to maintain sanitary conditions in the main kitchen, failure to date and label all food items, and failure to dispose of expired foods, in the central kitchen. The findings included: In a tour conducted on 11/15/22 at 8:30 AM in the main kitchen, the following was noted: In the dry storage area, 12 bottles that were 46 ounces each of Cranberry juice had a used-by date of 08/16/22, which expired over three months (photographic evidence obtained). In the dry storage area, five large, dented cans were 6.56 pounds each (photographic evidence obtained). The dry storage area's floor was noted with debris and dirt. One large garbage can was pointed out with the lid wholly opened and empty food boxes near it (photographic evidence obtained). A large Thickener bin was noted with the scoop inside (photographic evidence obtained). The food production area was noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a medical record that is complete and accurate for 1 out of 2 sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. (Resident #212). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Standards and Guidelines: SG (Standards and Guidelines) Indwelling Catheters, with a revised date of 03/27/21, included the following: It will be the standard of this facility to provide appropriate documentation for use and care for indwelling catheters of the resident's that have the indication for use beyond 14 days. Under Guidelines included: 8. Staff will provide daily catheter care or as ordered by the physician and/or needed. Catheter care should be provided in a manner that promotes infection control and maintenance of the insertion site. 13. Pertinent information regarding care and changes in condition related to the indwelling catheter should be documented in the clinical record. 14. Use of the indwelling catheter should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective call light system for 2 South (24 rooms). The findings included: On 11/15/22 at 11:40 AM this surveyor entered the room of Resident #244. The resident stated that she felt wet and needed to be changed. At 11:47 AM this surveyor asked her to press her call light so staff will be aware of her needs. At 11:54 AM no staff had come yet to answer the light. This surveyor looked out in the hallway and the light above the door to the room was on. This surveyor then walked to the nurse's desk where Staff H, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was present at the desk. She was asked if she realized that a call light was on and she stated that she did not hear it ringing so the call light in that room must not be working. She then notified the Director of Maintenance. On 11/15/22 at 1:30 PM another surveyor went into room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] and pressed the call lights. Observed Staff H at the desk with the call bell system behind…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to equip corridors with firmly secured an unbroken handrail. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Work Orders, Maintenance with no date included the following: To establish priority of maintenance service, work orders must be filled out electronically using an online application such as TELS and forward to the Maintenance Director. On 11/15/22 at 1:25 PM an observation of a loose handrail next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 11/15/22 at 10:20 AM an observation was made on the second floor across from the elevator of corner handrail broken with sharp edges exposed. On 11/15/22 at 10:20 AM an observation was made on the first floor across from the elevator of corner handrail broken with sharp edges exposed. During a tour of the facility conducted on 11/18/22 at 9:00 AM with the Director of Maintenance he stated that some of the issues identified, he was not aware of. During an interview conducted on 11/18/22 at 9:45 AM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON HEIGHTS NURSING AND REHAB HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/25/2022 |
| FL MASTER OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 95% | since 07/27/2022 |
| MORFA, ALEXIS | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/27/2022 |
| SCHEINER, MOSHE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/27/2022 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105510. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.