No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lakes Of Clermont Health And Rehabilitation Center

1775 Hooks Street, Clermont, FL 34711 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (352) 717-7980 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation$14,335 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $14,335 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1725 E Highway 50 · (352) 243-6686 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1500 Oakley Seaver Dr · (352) 989-5850 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1720 E Highway 50 · (352) 241-6177 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Place of worship
13322 Excalibur Rd · (352) 241-9909

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.8%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.5%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.5%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.7%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.5%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.5%9.1%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 447 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.07U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.48hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.51hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 165 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.0%CMS range 62.2–69.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 8.2–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.9%CMS range 6.5–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
68.8%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 69.1 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and reviews of manufacturer recommendation, and FDA (Food and Drug Administration) safety guide, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from accidents and hazards by failing to provide adequate supervision for a resident during use of a mechanical lift for obtaining weights. On October 17, 2023, Resident #4 was observed in her room unattended and unsupervised while suspended by a sling of a mechanical lift, hanging in the air over the floor next to her bed. It is unknown how long the resident had been suspended by the sling. The facility's failure to provide supervision and leaving Resident #4 unattended led to the determination of Immediate Jeopardy at a scope and severity of isolated (J). The Nursing Home Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 10/20/2023, at 8:45 AM. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/17/2023 and was removed on site on 10/20/2023. A fall from a mechanical lift can cause serious injuries, including bone fractures, internal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders to provide wound care for 1 of 2 residents, Residents #45, reviewed for skin conditions.Findings include:During an observation on 2/23/2026 at 11:20 AM, Resident #45 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room. There was a dressing on Resident #45's right forearm with dark color dried substance matter on the dressing. The dressing did not have a date or initials (photographic evidence obtained).During an interview on 2/23/2026 at 11:20 AM, Resident #45 stated, This is a skin tear on my arm, but I do not recall how I got it.During an observation on 2/24/2026 at approximately 8:05 AM, Resident #45 was sitting up in his bed. There was a dressing on his right forearm with dark substance matter. The dressing was not dated or initialed. Review of Resident #45's physician orders revealed no wound care or dressing change orders in place.Review of Resident #45's Treatment Administration Record for February 2026 revealed no wound care or dressing change.During an observation on 2/24/2026 at 1:21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory in accordance with professional standard of practice for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #96, reviewed for respiratory services.Findings include:During an observation on 2/23/2026 at 9:53 AM, Resident #96 was lying in bed, receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute. The resident was not in acute respiratory distress at the time of observation.During an interview on 2/23/2026 at 9:54 AM, Resident #96 stated, I don't need any oxygen. My oxygen is usually 97 and 98%. The resident denied shortness of breath at the time of interview.Review of Resident #96's physician orders revealed no physician order for oxygen therapy.During an observation on 2/24/2026 at 8:41 AM, Resident #96 was lying in bed, receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute. The resident was not in acute respiratory distress at the time of observation.During an interview on 2/24/2026 at 9:04 AM, Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, The oxygen was set at 3 liter per minute.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored in 2 of 4 units. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 2/23/2026 at 10:47 AM, Resident #97 was lying in bed with eyes closed. On top of the cabinet table across from the resident's bed, there was one blue bottle of Wound Cleansing Solution (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 2/23/2026 at 2:30 PM, Resident #97 was lying in bed. On top of the cabinet table across from the resident's bed, there was one bottle of Wound Cleansing Solution. During an interview on 2/23/2026 at 3:42 PM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, The wound cleanser should not have been left in [Resident #97's name] room. It [wound cleanser] should be stored in the treatment cart. 2) During an observation on 2/23/2026 at 11:09 AM, Resident #108 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room. There was one container of zinc oxide diaper rash cream, and one bottle of Ammonium Lactate 12% (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 2/23/2026 at 11:09 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene while distributing water, providing wound care, and administering medications, and failed to ensure staff used proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care and services for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #97, reviewed for transmission-based precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases.Findings include:1) During an observation on 2/23/2026 beginning at 2:30 PM Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was carrying three foam cups that had lids on them and straws inserted through the lids. The cups were labeled 2/23/2026, 7P - 7A (indicates the 7:00 PM shift that ended at 7:00 AM in the morning). Staff A placed the used cups on the second shelf of a three-tier pushcart. Staff A did not perform hand hygiene and touched multiple cups located on the top shelf of the cart in preparation for delivery to the residents. The cups were labeled 2/23/2026, 2 PM. Staff A did not perform hand hygiene and retrieved two of the new cups…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's family/responsible party was notified of falls, physician orders, and hospital transfer for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's clinical record documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to unspecified fracture of the upper end of the right tibia, encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, cellulitis (infection of the skin) of the right lower limb, repeat falls, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting of muscle). Review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 5/22/2025 at 16:56 (4:56 PM) read Patient was seated on the floor on her buttocks in front of her wheelchair with legs extended out in front of her. Patient denies hitting her head. Able to move all extremities within normal limits. Review of Resident #1's clinical record found it did not contain documentation of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for application of Thrombo-Embolic Deterrent (TED) stockings for 2 of 3 resident reviewed, Residents #174 and #62 (Photographic evidence obtained), and failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered by physician for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Residents#175, #49 and #323. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #174's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the right lower limb, atrial fibrillation, thoracic aortic ectasia, and essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #174's physician order dated 9/8/2024 read, Compression hose to bilat [bilateral] lower extremities in the morning for orthostatic hypotension [low blood pressure] apply in AM [morning] and remove at HS [bedtime] and remove per schedule. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in a secured manner in accordance with currently accepted professional principles (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: 1) During an observation on 9/16/2024 at 11:47 AM, there were three containers on Resident #32's dresser. One container contained red fluid and the other two contained transparent liquids. All containers had labels that read, Poison/Do Not Drink. During an interview on 9/16/2024 at 11:58 AM, Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, Those are for stool sample and should be in the bathroom. They were here since Saturday [9/14/2024]. It is poisonous. When we get a sample, we should have them in the bathroom. The medications and biologicals need to be stored in a secured place. During an interview on 9/18/2024 at 3:14 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, The biologicals should be securely stored when the sample is being collected. 2) During an observation on 9/16/2024 at 9:40 AM, there was one anti-itch spray on the bedside table in Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure stored food items were labeled and dated in Refrigerator No. 1 in the kitchen and in the nourishment room refrigerator (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: 1) During an observation while conducting the initial tour of the kitchen on 9/16/2024 at 9:24 AM, there was one bag containing food with no label or date stored in Refrigerator #1 in the kitchen. During an interview on 9/16/2024 at 9:26 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) confirmed that the food item stored in Refrigerator #1 did not have a label or date. During an interview on 9/16/2024 at 9:55 AM, Staff E, Dietary Aide, stated the unlabeled bag contained chicken and mashed potato. 2) During an observation on 9/16/2024 at 9:46 AM, there were two bags containing food items with no label and date stored in the refrigerator of the nourishment room. During an interview on 9/16/2024 at 9:46 AM, the CDM identified the food items as yogurt and chicken and confirmed that they were not labeled and dated. 3) During an observation while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 3 of 8 residents reviewed, Residents #174, #62, and #374. 1) Review of Resident #174's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the right lower limb, atrial fibrillation, thoracic aortic ectasia, and essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #174's physician order dated 9/8/2024 read, Compression hose to bilat [bilateral] lower extremities in the morning for orthostatic hypotension [low blood pressure] apply in AM [morning] and remove at HS [bedtime] and remove per schedule. During an observation on 9/16/2024 at 10:40 AM, Resident #174 was sitting in his wheelchair, with no TED stockings applied. During an observation on 9/17/2024 at 12:15 PM, Resident #174 was sitting up in his wheelchair at bedside, with no TED hose applied. During an interview on 9/17/2024 at 1:11 PM, Staff A, Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing high contact care to the residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: During an observation on 9/18/2024 at 9:22 AM, Resident #375's room door had a signage that read, Stop. Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Everyone must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens, Providing Hygiene, Changing briefs or assisting with toileting, Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy, Wound Care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. During an observation on 9/18/2024 at 9:28 AM, Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN), entered Resident #375's room wore gloves but did not wear a gown. Staff A applied a dressing on the resident's sacral wound.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure wound care treatment was provided as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents, Residents #7. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical chart documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include fusion of the spine in the lumbosacral region [surgery to connect two or more bones], acute respiratory failure, spinal stenosis and cauda equina syndrome [nerve roots in the lumbar spine are compressed, cutting off sensation and movement]. Review of the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) Communication Form dated 4/29/23 Situation: Skin wound or ulcer. This started on: 04/29/2023. Skin Evaluation: Pressure Ulcer. Wound with full thickness tissue loss. Recommendations of Primary Clinicians: Continue to pack wound with lodoform packing strip and cover with Island dressing. Review of physician's orders dated 4/30/23 read, Right posterior thigh cleanse with NS [normal saline] pat dry, pack with Iodoform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles to include the expiration date when applicable in 1 of 3 medication carts observed and failed to ensure all medications were stored in locked compartments to permit only authorized personnel to have access. Findings include: During an observation on 5/15/23 at 10:55 AM of Medication Cart #2 located on the 300 hall with Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager there were six insulin pens, three insulin Lispro Kwik Pens, one Humalog Kwik Pen, one Insulin Glargine Pen, one Lantus Solostar Pen, that were opened and undated to provide the expiration of the medication. (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 5/15/23 at 11:00 AM Staff F, RN/Unit Manager verified the insulin pens were opened and stated, My expectation is for anyone that opens an insulin pen to date it. During an interview conducted on 5/15/23 at 11:23 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were complete and accurate for 3 of 10 records reviewed, Residents #11, #28 and #35. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #28's physician orders dated 3/16/2023 read, Heel protectors while in bed every shift. During an observation on 5/15/2023 at 2:28 PM Resident #28 was lying in bed resting. The resident did not have heel protectors. During an observation on 5/16/2023 at 08:07 AM Resident #28 was lying in bed and did not have heel protectors. During an interview on 5/16/2023 at 08:45 AM Resident #28 stated I don't wear them anymore [heel protectors]. During an interview on 5/17/2023 at 08:13 with Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) in Resident #28's room stated, Heel protectors have not been used since the patient received the specialty bed. [Resident #28's name] is lying in the bed with no heels protectors on and heel protectors are not available. Review of the Treatment Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,335 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,335 — penalty dated 2023-10-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alhambra Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 1 of 5Lady Lake Specialty Care Center and RehabLady Lake, FL 2 of 5Cypress Care CenterWildwood, FL 2 of 5Lehigh Acres Healthcare & Rehab CenterLehigh Acres, FL 2 of 5North Beach Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterNorth Miami Beach, FL 2 of 5Park Meadows Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterGainesville, FL 2 of 5Rockledge Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterRockledge, FL 2 of 5Sunset Lake Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVenice, FL 2 of 5Village Place Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterPort Charlotte, FL 2 of 5Villages Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center, TheLady Lake, FL 3 of 5Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 3 of 5Club Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center At The VThe Villages, FL 3 of 5Greenbriar Healthcare Rehabilitation And Nursing CBradenton, FL 3 of 5Grove Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center And RehHernando, FL 3 of 5Lexington Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 3 of 5Shore Acres Care Center And RehabSaint Petersburg, FL 3 of 5South Campus Care Center And RehabLeesburg, FL 3 of 5The Club At Lake GibsonLakeland, FL 3 of 5Viera Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterViera, FL 4 of 5Advanced Care CenterClearwater, FL 4 of 5North Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 4 of 5North Lake Care Center And RehabLake Park, FL 4 of 5Ridgecrest Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDeland, FL 4 of 5The Lodge Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterOcala, FL 4 of 5Wilton Manors Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWilton Manors, FL 5 of 5Carlton Shores Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenteDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Isle Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterOrange Park, FL 5 of 5Kendall Lakes Healthcare And Rehab CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Plaza Health And RehabGainesville, FL 5 of 5Ponce Therapy Care Center And Rehab, TheSaint Augustine, FL 5 of 5Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterGainesville, FL 5 of 5Unity Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Villa Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterDeland, FL 5 of 5Woodland Grove Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterJacksonville, FL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CLERMONT SNF HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/19/2024
RM IRRV TR 07012022Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 07/19/2024
GOLD FL TRUST IIOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/19/2024
SILVER FL TRUST IIOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/19/2024
CLEMONS, JAMESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
KERR, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
MATHURIN, LISENAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
SHELLEY, KELLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
MANELA, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2024
PATHAK, RAHULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
MILLENNIAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
ELLENBOGEN, MOSSIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$552K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 28%Medicare 35%Other / private 37%

This home reported $552K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$453per resident / day
operating cost
$13,785per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$407per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106134. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next