The Lodge Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 91.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with allergies were provided foods that were free from allergens for 1 (Resident #297) of 12 residents sampled who had food allergies. Resident #297 had a peanut allergy. On 2/23/2025 at 7:00 PM, Resident #297 was provided with a [NAME] Buddy snack by Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant. Staff G did not review Resident #297's meal ticket or Resident #297's electronic medical record to determine her allergies. At approximately 10:00 PM Resident #297 consumed several bites of the cookie and began to experience a burning and itching sensation in her throat. Resident #297 notified facility staff and was treated with medication for an allergic reaction. A peanut allergy is a condition that causes the body's germ-fighting immune system to react to peanuts. An allergic response to peanuts usually occurs within minutes after exposure. Peanut allergy signs and symptoms can include skin reactions, such as hives, redness or swelling. Itching or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions by failing to label and date food items in the facility kitchen walk in cooler, in 1 of 3 nurses' station nourishment areas, and in 1 of 3 nourishment room refrigerators.Findings include:During an observation on 6/7/26 at 9:16 AM of the kitchen's walk-in cooler, located on a shelf was a small igloo cooler with no label or date. The contents inside consisted of a glass container with a plastic blue lid, the contents in the glass container were unidentifiable, and there was no label or date on the contents. During an interview on 6/7/26 at 9:20 AM Staff H, Cook, stated that there should be no personal food in the refrigerator and the contents should have been labeled and dated. During an interview on 6/8/26 at 8:45 AM the Certified Dietary Manager, stated absolutely no personal food should be kept in the walk-in kitchen refrigerator.During an observation on 6/7/26 at 9:30 AM of the nourishment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary grooming and hygiene services for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #21, sampled for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include:Review of Resident #21's clinical record documented medical diagnoses to include dementia, fractured left femur requiring orthopedic aftercare, embolism and thrombosis (clots in blood stream) of the left lower extremity, falls, and dislocated shoulder.Review of Resident #21's care plan dated 5/21/2026 documented the resident had a self-care deficit with dressing, grooming, and bathing related to impaired mobility, left femur fracture, and generalized weakness. Interventions included gathering and setting up supplies for care, allowing the resident time to participate in ADLs, encouraging assistance as needed, and explaining care during provision of services.Review of Minimal Data set (MDS) admission dated 5/27/2026 Section GG documented the resident required Substantial/Maximal Assistance with bathing.During an observation on 6/7/2026 at 11:00 AM, Resident #21 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided for a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) access device in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #110 reviewed for PICC access devices. Findings include:Review of Resident #1's clinical record documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnosis that include but not limited to cellulitis (infection in skin) of left lower limb, cellulitis of right lower limb, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (bacterial infection), local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (first layer of skin), non-pressure chronic ulcer of left lower leg. During an observation on 6/9/2026 at 06:03 AM Resident #110 was lying in the bed. There was a PICC line inserted into the resident's left arm. Over the PICC line insertion site there was a transparent dressing covering the insertion site. Under the transparent dressing was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were securely stored in accordance with accepted professional principles for 4 of 5 resident halls.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 6/7/2026 at 9:52 AM, Resident #94 was observed resting in bed. A bottle of Nystatin 100,000 units/gram topical powder was observed sitting on the resident's dresser. (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 6/7/2026 at 9:52 AM, Resident #94 stated, That powder is for my rash on my breast. 2) During an observation on 6/7/2026 at 10:02 AM, Resident #78 was observed sleeping in bed. A bottle of Hydrogen Peroxide 3% Topical Solution was observed on the resident's bedside table. (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 6/7/2026 at 9:55 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that medications should not be left at the bedside and that his expectation is for staff to follow the facility policy regarding the storage of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care equipment was cleaned and disinfected between uses in accordance with facility policy for 1 of 3 sit-to-stand assistive devices, Device #7, failed to conduct hand hygiene, and failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) while conducting wound care for Resident #66. Findings include:1) During an observation on 6/7/2026 at 10:20 AM, the Sit-to-Stand assistive device, Device #7, was observed on the [NAME] Hall with a maroon-colored substance splattered on the floor/platform portion of the device.During a subsequent observation with the Director of Nursing on 6/8/2026 at 1:20 PM, the Sit-to-Stand assistive device, Device #7, was observed on Boston Hall with the same, maroon-colored substance splattered on the floor/platform portion of the device. (Photographic evidence obtained).During an interview on 6/8/2026 at 1:22 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, It is our expectation that the equipment is cleaned before and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the provider and resident representative of a change in condition for 1 (Resident #397) of 5 residents reviewed for intravenous therapy. Findings include: During an observation on 2/23/2025 at 10:30 AM, Resident #397 was observed lying in bed with the head of bed elevated. She had a single lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line in her right upper arm with a transparent dressing dated 2/9/2025. The dressing was intact around the insertion site but was noted to be partially lifted on the bottom right inside corner and brownish stains on the outside of the dressing. Review of the physician's order for Resident #397 dated 2/13/2025 read, Discontinue IV line right upper extremity [RUE] one time only for dc [discontinue]. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #397 documented the PICC line was discontinued on 2/13/2025 by [Staff O's initials] at 1358 [1:58 PM]. During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 9:19 AM, Staff O, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, When I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 2 (Resident #63 and #71) of 4 reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: Review of Resident #71's admission record documented an admission date of 9/20/2024 with diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, shortness of breath, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and pleural effusion (fluid around the lungs). An observation on 2/23/2025 at 9:40 AM, Resident #71's oxygen concentrator was set on 3 liters. An observation on 2/24/2025 at 2:15 PM, Resident #71's oxygen concentrator was set on 3 liters. Review of Resident #71's physician's order dated 9/22/2024 read, Oxygen at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula with humidification when on the concentrator. May be without humidification when on a tank. Review of Resident #71's care plan dated 7/25/2024 read, [Resident #71's name] has a potential for complication of respiratory distress related to a diagnosis of COPD. Goals included resident will be able to maintain patent airway and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 (Resident #2, #301, and #397) of 7 residents reviewed for intravenous lines, medication administration and unnecessary medications. Findings Include: 1) During an observation on 2/23/2025 at 10:30 AM, Resident #397 was observed lying in bed with the head of bed elevated. She had a single lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line in her right upper arm with a transparent dressing dated 2/9/2025. The dressing was intact around the insertion site but was noted to be partially lifted on the bottom right inside corner and brownish stains on the outside of the dressing. During an interview conducted on 2/23/2025 at 10:30 AM, Resident #397 stated, I have an IV (intravenous line) for my antibiotics because I have an infection. Review of the admission record documented that Resident #397 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct oxygen flow rate for 3 (Resident #63, #65, and #71) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: During an observation on 2/23/2025 at 9:40 AM, Resident #71's oxygen concentrator was set on 3 liters. During an observation on 2/24/2025 at 2:15 PM, Resident #71's oxygen concentrator was set on 3 liters. During an interview on 2/24/2025 at 2:18 PM, Resident #71 stated that she does not operate or have knowledge of how to adjust the oxygen concentrator. Review of Resident #71's physician's order dated 9/22/2024 read, Oxygen at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula with humidification when on the concentrator. May be without humidification when on a tank. During an interview on 2/24/2025 at 2:30 PM, Staff A, License Practical Nurse (LPN), stated the prescribed order calls for the O2 (oxygen) was for 2 liters. Staff A confirmed that the oxygen was set at 3 liters and should have been 2 liters per the physician's order. During an interview on 2/25/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. The medication error rate was 6.98 percent. Findings include: During an observation on 2/25/2025 at 8:44 AM, Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN), without hand hygiene began to pour Resident #58's medication. Staff H entered Resident #58's room and without hand hygiene handed Resident #58 his medication cup. Staff H handed Resident #58 his Styrofoam cup which contained water. Staff H handed Resident #58 his nasal spray. Resident #58 self-administered two nasal sprays on each nostril. Staff H performed hand hygiene before exiting Resident #58's room. During an interview on 2/25/2025 at 8:52 AM, Staff H, RN, stated, [Resident #58's Name] should only do one spray per nostril not two sprays in each nostril. We did not follow the physician order. I should have reminded him [Resident #58] he was to do one spray per nostril before handing him the nasal spray. Review of Resident #58's physician's order dated 12/5/2024 read, Fluticasone Propionate Nasal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,737 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,737 — penalty dated 2025-02-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL