Wilton Manors Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 186 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 86% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 147 beds and averages 135.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 16% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received appropriate care and treatment to prevent an evolving change in condition and status for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed, Resident #113. The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, provided the Director of Nursing (DON), revised May 2017, documented in the Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and the representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical / mental condition and/or status (e.g. changes in level of care, billing / payments, resident rights, etc.). Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a (an): .d. significant change in the resident's condition . 2. A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the American Dietetic Association titled National Dysphagia Level 2: Mechanically Altered Nutrition Therapy showed the following: for vegetables, it is recommended to be soft, well cooked, should be less than 1/2 inch, and easily mashed with a fork. 3a. Record review revealed Resident #230 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Unspecific Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Unspecific Dementia, and Muscle Weakness. On 06/16/25 at 12:44 PM, an observation was conducted, during which Resident #230 was noted in her room eating her lunch meal, being assisted by staff. The meal ticket listed the following: a mechanically altered ground diet with pureed fruits and vegetables, collard greens, macaroni and cheese, a dinner roll, ground ham, and banana pudding. Closer observation of the food on the tray revealed that the pureed collard greens lacked a smooth consistency and were lumpy. 3b. Record review revealed Resident #106 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Unspecific…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and sanitary conditions and to prevent foodborne illnesses during two of the two visits to the main kitchen. The findings included: Review of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) report, dated March 2022, showed the following: raw hamburger, ground for 1-2 days, and fresh poultry, stored for 1-2 days, in the refrigerator. Website: https://www.fda.gov/food/people-risk-foodborne-illness/refrigerator-freezer-chart-food-safety-moms-be. On 06/16/25 at 8:55 AM, during tour and observation in the kitchen, the following were noted: a. The Hydron strip was used to check 1 of 3 red sanitation buckets for the appropriate sanitation solution. It showed 0, indicating that no sanitation solution was noted in the bucket. b. The reach-in freezer was marked by visible water droplets and ice buildup on the top and bottom of the freezer. c. The walk-in refrigerator was noted to contain a box of raw chicken thighs dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner while providing dining assistance during 1 of 3 dining observations conducted, affecting Resident #285. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life - Dignity, dated August 2009, included the following: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. 2. Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. 11. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents as needed. Record review for Resident #285 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Vascular Dementia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light devices were within reach of 4 of 93 rooms, room numbers 23, 25, 29 and 104. The findings included: 1. On 06/16/25 at 9:53 AM, an observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER] and both residents were in bed. Upon further observation of the bed near the window, it was observed the call light cord was wrapped around the bed rail with the call light push button dangling towards the back of the bed and not within reach. Photographic Evidence Obtained. At this time the resident was asked if he knew how to call the nurse if he needs assistance and he stated yes. Then it was observed that the resident was looking for the call light push button, stating he could not find it and was unable to reach the cord that was wrapped around the bed rail and not within reach. 2. On 06/16/25 at 10:14 AM, an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted and both residents were sleeping in bed. During this observation, it was observed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 29 sampled residents, Resident #328. The findings included: 1. Record review documented Resident #328 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of encounter for other orthopedic aftercare and displaced trimalleolar fracture of left lower leg, encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. The Medicare - 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]documented the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score is 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the Physician's Orders showed Resident #328 had an order dated 05/20/25 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions: Surgical wound. Review of the care plan dated 05/31/25 documented Resident #328 had skin impairment localized in the left ankle and left foot. Goals were the healing of wounds without complications by the next review date. The interventions did not include Enhanced Barrier Precautions. In an interview conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide assistance during dining for 1 of 1 sampled resident, reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), Resident #330. The findings included: 1. Record review documented Resident #330 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 06/16/25 with diagnoses that included Sepsis and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The Medicare - 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13, indicating mild cognitive impaired. Section GG of the MDS showed that Resident #330 needs Substantial / Maximal Assistance during dining. Review of Resident #330 care plan dated 05/14/25 documented Resident #330 was at risk for an alteration in nutrition and/or hydration. The interventions put in place included providing hands on assist with eating at meals and as needed and provide cues / encouragement during meals. During an observation conducted on 06/16/25 at 12:15 PM, Resident #330 was seen in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility facility failed to ensure that services and treatment were provided to increase or maintain range of motion (ROM) and to prevent potential decrease in ROM, as ordered by physicians, for 2 of 2 sampled residents, reviewed for ROM, Residents #51 and #62. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Splints and Braces, undated, included the following: Procedures: 3. After therapy discharges the patient, the splints will be monitored by Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) or designee, Director of Rehab Services (DOR) and/or designee. A new T.O will be obtained to indicate the wearing schedule and the responsible department with updated care plan. 5. If a patient is issued a splint / brace and cannot be located, go to the ADON or DOR and get the correct or replacement of splint/brace. 8. Report to nurse any adverse observations. Review of the facility's policy titled, Contracture Management, undated, included the following: 3.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow proper technique and infection control practices during catheter care observation for 1 of 1 sampled resident observed, Resident #113. The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Urinary Catheter Care, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), revised September 2014, documented in the Policy Statement: Purpose: the purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTI). Preparation: 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. 2. Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed. General Guidelines: .Maintain Unobstructed Urine Flow: .3. The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder Record review revealed Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to complete a nutrition assessment in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #231. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Nutrition Assessment, revised in October 2017, showed the following: as part of the comprehensive assessment, a nutritional assessment, including current nutritional status and risk factors for impaired nutrition, shall be conducted for each resident. Nutritional assessment will be a systematic, multidisciplinary process that includes gathering and interpreting data and using that data to help define meaningful interventions for residents at risk for or with impaired nutrition. Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Interventions, revised September 2008, showed the following: The nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission, times 2, then monthly thereafter, the next day, and weekly for two weeks thereafter. If no weight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have dialysis communication sheets readily available for the continuation of care for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis, Resident #231. The findings included: Review of the facility's dialysis contract dated 05/27/21 revealed the following: Access to Records-provider will ensure that the Facility has any and all records of supplies and services provided to, and any flow sheets, progress notes, physician orders, incident reports, and other documentation which reflect the quality of treatments received by the Covered Patients. Providers and Caregivers will communicate information necessary to the Facility and/or Physician for continuing care of each Covered Patient, including medication administration for maximum therapeutic effect. Record review revealed Resident #231 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include End Stage Renal Disease, Diabetes and Anemia. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-06-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL