Wilton Manors Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 186 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 147 beds and averages 135.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 16% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received appropriate care and treatment to prevent an evolving change in condition and status for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed, Resident #113. The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, provided the Director of Nursing (DON), revised May 2017, documented in the Policy Statement: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and the representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical / mental condition and/or status (e.g. changes in level of care, billing / payments, resident rights, etc.). Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a (an): .d. significant change in the resident's condition . 2. A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident with a left-hand contracture for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a range of motion (ROM), Resident #108. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Splints and Braces, revised on January 2, 2024, revealed the following: Donn patient splint / brace according to positioning / splinting instructions. Allow the patient to wear a splint / brace per the therapist's recommended wearing schedule and tolerated. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Contracture Management, revised on January 2, 2024, revealed that treatment plans will be geared towards minimizing or possibly alleviating residents noted contractures. Record review revealed Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Major Depressive Disorder, repeated Falls, and Dementia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/19/24, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions in a timely manner to prevent further weight loss for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #101. The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Nutrition Assessment, revised in October 2017, revealed the following: Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be verified, and nursing will contact the Dietitian for further evaluation. The Dietitian will review the unit Weight Record by the 15th of the month to follow individual weight trends. Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team to determine whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. 5. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria where the percentage of body weight loss == (usual weight actual weight) (usual weight) - 100]: a. month 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct food consistency for 3 of 3 sampled residents who were on a mechanical soft / chopped, who were observed during dining, Resident #34, Resident #87, and Resident #230. This has the potential to affect 30 residents on a mechanical soft/chopped diet. The census at the time of the survey was 138 residents. The findings included: Review of the facility's diet manual dated 2019, provided by the facility's Dietitian, showed the following foods that were allowed on the mechanical soft diet: canned fruits, cooked or steamed fruit desserts, ripe banana, diced watermelon, diced ripe melon, diced ripe strawberries, and smooth fruit sauces. It further showed that all other fresh fruits were not allowed. Review of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative dated 2019, provided by Staff C, Speech Therapist, revealed the following: Level 5 minces and moist diet, to provide fruits served minced or chopped or mashed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a proper sanitizing solution in the central kitchen for 2 of 3 red buckets observed during the initial tour of the kitchen; and failed to offer or encourage hand hygiene prior to dining for 5 of 5 sampled residents observed during dining, Residents #10, #24, #381, #99, and #69. The findings included: 1. The first visit to the central kitchen was conducted on 03/18/24 at 8:50 AM, accompanied by the Culinary Food Manager. The following issues were observed: a. The Culinary Food Manager used a testing strip taken from the (Hydrion quaternary sanitizer test tape) to check the concentration of the solution from the first red bucket. Further observation showed the test strip read 500 ppm (parts per million). This revealed that the concentration solution in the 1st red bucket was too high. In this observation, the Culinary Food Manager stated that the reading of 500 ppm was too high. b. The Culinary Food Manager used a testing strip…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide restorative rehabilitation services in a manner that promotes the highest practicable level of functioning for 1 of 5 sampled residents receiving restorative services during dining (Resident #10). The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Restorative Nursing Services,, revised in July 2017, revealed that Residents would receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. Residents may start on restorative nursing programs upon admission, during stay or when discharged from rehabilitative care. Restorative goals may include: Supporting and assisting the Resident in adjusting or adapting to changing abilities. Maintaining dignity, independence, and self-esteem. Developing and strengthening physiological and psychological resources. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dysphagia, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to treat 3 of 3 sampled residents, Resident's #95, #105,and #281, and potentially 132 facility residents, with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes enhancement of quality of life that includes providing drinking cups and glasses with meals. The findings included: During the observation of the lunch meal of 12/05/22, breakfast meal of 12/06/22, and lunch meal of 12/06/22, it was observed that all residents who received beverages in disposable cartons, including milk, thickened milk, juice and supplements, did not receive a drinking cup for the cartons' beverages. Specifically, the facility residents were required to drink straight from the disposable cartons. The facility residents were noted to receive 1 - 3 beverages on the meal trays. Interviews conducted with sampled Residents' #95, #105, and #281 at this time voiced their displeasure to be required to drink from disposable cartons. Both residents' #105 and #281 stated they have stopped drinking whole milk and thickened milk due to having…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure it secured and locked over-the-counter (OTC) expired and prescription medications for 5 of 5 residents observed during an observational room tour, Resident #80, Resident #77, Resident #68, Resident #230 and Resident #40; failed to ensure it kept its facility emergency crash cart locked and secured; failed to ensure it disposed of an expired stock medication in the South wing Treatment cart; and failed to ensure it secured loose unidentified medication pills for 1 of 6 observed medication carts during the Medication Storage Observation for the North wing medication cart. The findings included: Review of facility policy and procedure on 12/07/22 at 2:30 PM, titled, Storage of Medications, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), revised date 08/2020, documented in part: Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly, following manufacturer's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations and records review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #102) received an adaptive call light to notify staff of her needs. The findings included: Review of the electronic clinical record revealed that Resident #102 was diagnosed with Cerebral Infarction due to Unspecified Occlusion or Stenosis Of Right Middle Cerebral Artery; Hemiplegia, Unspecified Affecting Left Nondominant Side; and Other Reduced Mobility. On 12/05/22 at 1:21 PM, during an interview with Resident #102, she said that her neck, right elbow, and shoulder were hurting her. She was asked to use her call light to request for assistance. She said that her call light was too far away. Observation conducted during the conversation showed the call light was on the floor on the right side of the resident's bed. Photographic Evidence Obtained. The call light was then placed in the Resident's right hand, and she was asked to press on it. She tried but was unable to press on the balloon to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure protection of 1 of 1 sampled resident's, Resident # 328, personal property from loss or theft. The findings included: Review of the electronic Census record showed that Resident # 328 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Social Service notes, dated [DATE] revealed that the resident's daughter and wife had reported missing a kindle and electric shaver which belonged to the resident. The notes showed that Staff searched the storage room, but the items were not located. A gift card was issued on [DATE] to the family. The Social Worker (SW) noted that the missing items were not on the inventory sheet. On [DATE] at 11:36 AM, Resident #328's family member reported that they made multiple calls to the facility to retrieve Resident #328's personal properties left at the facility subsequent to Resident #328's discharge from the facility. According to Resident #328's relatives, the list of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with activities of daily living: nail grooming for 1 of 1 sampled resident's observed, Resident #60. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on 12/07/22 at 2:30 PM, titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), revised February 2018, documented, in part: Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. Preparation: 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident .General Guidelines: 1. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. 2. Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed .Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time that nail care was given. 2. The name of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-06-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL