Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 92.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper temperatures and palatable meals were provided to two residents (#2, #6) out of three residents sampled. Findings included: 1. On 1/16/25 at 9:56 a.m., an observation of Resident #6 revealed he was lying in bed watching television. He stated every meal was cold. He stated meals are, Not even lukewarm. Resident #6 stated the food last night for dinner was cold. He described the meal he received as, A hamburger patty with a bun. Resident #6 stated, Happens all the time. A review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed an admission date of 12/16/24. The admission Record revealed diagnoses to include: sepsis, unspecified organism, muscle weakness (generalized), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, atherosclerotic, and heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. A review of Resident #6's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section C - Cognitive Patterns, dated 12/21/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the notification and invitation to participate in the comprehensive care plan for two residents (#43 and #44) of two sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the admission Record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 3/2/2022 with diagnoses to include: dementia; major depressive disorder, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertension; and other co-morbidities. An interview was conducted with Resident #43's representative on 6/25/2024 at 2:11 p.m. Resident #43's representative stated, I did not know they had care plan meetings, I have not received any information about any meetings. Review of the admission Record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 4/30/2024, with diagnoses to include metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, dementia and other co-morbidities. An interview was conducted with Resident #44's representative on 6/26/2024 at 9:33 a.m. Resident #44's representative stated they have not received an invitation to attend care plan meetings.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety. Findings included: A tour of the main kitchen conducted on 6/25/2024 at 9:15 a.m. and accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM) showed the following: 1. A rag was noted on the main production counter that was not in any buckets or solutions, the solution bucket was sitting on the counter. A personal jacket was on the second shelf of the counter, sitting on top of the lids, and bowls. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). 2. A garbage can with no lid was at the entrance, another trash receptacle with no lid was next to the sink near the tray line. The DM stated the garbage should have lids on when not in use. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). 3. The second shelf of the tray line had a container of bleach sitting out next to a basket with crackers and open boxes of hot chocolate mix. The DM stated the chemicals should not be stored there. (Photographic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review,, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program to mitigate and prevent the spread of infection related to: 1) not ensuring staff were donning appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering a resident room under contact isolation precautions for one (#23) of one sampled resident observed for contact isolation precautions, 2) not ensuring resident medical equipment had a cleanable surface for one resident (#43) of five sampled residents, and 3) not ensuring linen was transported and stored in a way to prevent contamination with seven of seven carts observed. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 6/25/2024 at 10:03 a.m. during the initial tour of the facility. Resident #23's room door had a blue 8 ½ by 11 (letter size) laminated paper sign that showed; Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The sign was hung on the door with mesh caddy with multiple pockets. The pockets contained gloves, isolation gowns, masks, and disinfecting wipes. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to file a grievance on behalf of one resident (#44) of one resident reviewed for grievances. Findings included: Review of Resident #44's admission Record showed admission to the facility on 4/30/24, with diagnoses to include metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia. An interview was conducted on 6/26/24 at 9:33 a.m. with Resident #44's family member. She said she reported to the facility concerns and had not received a response. The family member said one of the concerns was related to the death of Resident #44's roommate. In the presence of the family member, a member of the therapy team opened the roommate's curtain and said, oh she is dead and closed the curtain. The family member said this was immediately reported to the facility's leadership. The family member provided a written copy of concerns she discussed with the Director of Nursing (DON) earlier in the day. (Photographic Evidence Obtained.) An interview was conducted with the DON, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Unit Manager…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directive care plans were accurate or developed for three residents (#31, #4, #36) out of 41 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #31's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], she received hospice services, and had medical diagnoses not limited to type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #31's physician order with a start date of 5/1/24 and no end date revealed DNR [do not resuscitate]. Review of Resident #31's [name of state] Do Not Resuscitate Order revealed Resident #31's power of attorney (POA) signed the document on 4/10/24 and Resident #31's physician signed the document on 4/11/24. Review of Resident #31's care plan with a revision date of 2/16/24 revealed [Resident #31] has expressed the following wishes regarding code status and has the following advanced directives in place: is Full Code, DPOA [durable power of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure splints were applied to prevent the decrease of range of motion for one resident (#35) of five sampled residents . Findings included: On 6/25/2024 at 10:57 a.m. Resident #35 was observed and interviewed. Resident #35 stated she was not able to utilize her left hand due to a stroke. Resident # 35's left hand was observed laying across the resident's abdomen in a fist. Resident #35 was unable to move her fingers and stated, it would be nice to have something keep my hand open, as it (hand) becomes 'smelly'. On 6/26/2024 at 11:17 a.m. Resident #35 was observed lying in bed with no splint on her left hand. Review of Resident #35's admission Record revealed an admission date of 6/7/2022 with diagnoses: flaccid hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side, cerebral infarction, and other co-morbidities. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/16/2024, Section GG Functional Status revealed Resident #35 was dependent on staff with mobility and activities of daily living (ADL) performance and had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to dispose of garbage appropriately for two of two dumpsters outside of the kitchen. Findings included: On 6/25/2024 at 9:50 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, with the dietary manager, an inspection of the dumpster area was conducted, and the following was noted. -Two dumpsters were noted in the rear parking area near the kitchen door. An extreme odor was present. The walls of both dumpsters were soiled with brown/black substance surrounding most of the dumpsters. The walls of the dumpster's appeared to be black although at the top of the dumpster's were yellow in color. The top of one dumpster lid was fully open and the other closed. The side door of both dumpster's was open and exposing the garbage inside, additionally there were multiple trash bags, crates and significant amounts of debris noted to be stored on the side and back of the dumpster's. The debris consisted of used incontinent products, plastic utensils, gloves, empty pill wrappers, plastic cups, lids, straws, and numerous garbage bags. (Photographic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one kitchen dish washing machines was maintained in accordance with manufacturer recommendations, related to the wash and rinse temperature. Findings include: On 05/02/22 at 10:16 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). During the observed timeframe, two staff members were observed working in the dishwashing area. One staff member was observed placing soiled dishes on a crate to load into the dish machine and one staff member was removing clean dishes from a crate that had just came through the dish machine. The CDM was asked to demonstrate a washing/rinsing cycle. The following was observed: First Demonstration: The digital temperature panel indicated the wash cycle temperature reaching 132 degrees Fahrenheit; and the rinse cycle temperature reaching 114F. The CDM revealed he identified there was an issue with the dish machine this morning and called the dish washing machine repair company. The CDM was asked to provide confirmation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store medications in a locked compartment for one (East Unit) of four medication carts, one (East Unit) of four wound treatment carts, two bags of pharmacy return medications, and failed to store controlled medication in separate locked compartment in one (Rapid Unit) of two medication storage rooms. Findings include: An observation was made on [DATE] at 10:15 a.m. of three bags of unsecured pharmacy return medication sitting on a cart in the East Unit nurses' station. This nurses' station was near the main entrance of the facility. All visitors must pass this station upon entering and leaving the facility. The nurses' station was also located on a main hall of resident rooms. An observation was made on [DATE] at 1:48 p.m. of the East Unit nurses' station. The three bags of medication remained unsecured, sitting on top of a wound treatment cart. One bag was labeled Used IV Pump and two bags were labeled Pharmacy Returns. The wound treatment cart was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL