Club Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center At The V

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 379 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 255 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 65.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #11 and #90).Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #90 physician order dated 6/3/2026 read, Flomax Capsule 0.4 MG [milligram] give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of Resident #90 Minimum Data Set titled Medicare 5 Day dated 6/4/2026 Section I Active Diagnoses did not document Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. During an interview on 6/17/2026 at 10:56 AM with MDS Coordinator stated, [Resident #90's name] MDS needs to be corrected to add Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia he was ordered Flomax for that diagnosis. 2) Review of Resident #11 progress note dated 5/30/2026 read, cervical collar to be worn at all times every shift when this writer arrived on shift and completed rounds, I observed resident without his collar on, I woke resident up and asked if i [sic] could put his collar back on resident stated no and went back to sleep. Review of Resident #11 MDS titled Modification of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed when a mental illness was identified for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #20, review for PASRR screening.Findings include:During an interview on 06/17/2026 at 1:42 PM the Social Services Director (SSD) with the Social Services Assistant (SSA) the SSD said she had started working for the facility three weeks ago. We need to assist with ensuring PASRRs (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) are up to date moving forward during the psychiatry meeting we have once a week to discuss GDR's [gradual dose reductions]. During an interview on 06/18/2026 at 9:42 AM the Director of Nursing stated, It is a joint effort between the social services and clinical team to ensure they [PASRRs] are updated. We have a PASRR performance improvement plan that was started on 3/13/2026. It was for the newly admitted residents' PASRRs to be reviewed, it did not include updating the PASRRs to reflect the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for nail care for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #59, reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. Findings include:During an observation on 06/15/2026 at 09:35 AM Resident #59 was reclining in bed with her hands resting on her lap. The resident's nails on both hands were jagged and had dark matter under the length of the nails. The nails were approximately 5 to 8 millimeters in length and all the nails on both hands had jagged edges.During an observation on 06/16/2026 at 10:25 AM Resident #59 was sitting in a wheelchair in the resident's room conversing with her spouse. The resident's nails on both hands had been filed and no longer continued to have jagged edges. The nails on both hands continued to have a dark matter substance under the length of the resident's nails.During an interview on 06/16/2026 at 10:30 AM Resident #59 stated, They do not give me wipes or a washcloth to wipe my hands before I eat or after I go to the bathroom.During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medication administration per the physician's ordered parameters for 1 of 6 residents, Resident #46, reviewed for medication management. Findings include:Review of Resident #46 physician order dated 3/9/2026 read, Clonidine HCl [Hydrochloride] Oral Tablet 0.1 MG [milligram] (Clonidine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for BP [blood pressure] systolic greater than 150 or diastolic over 90.Review of Resident #46 Weight and Vital Summary for the month of June 2026 documented on 6/13/2026 at 07:44 [7:44 AM] blood pressure was 174/93.Review of Resident #46's Medication Administration Record for the month of June 2026 did not document Clonidine 0.1 mg was administered.Review of Resident #46 Weight and Vital Summary for the month of May 2026 documented on 5/1/2026 at 09:02 [9:02 AM] blood pressure was 161/105, on 5/2/2026 at 07:38 [7:38 AM] blood pressure was 174/85, on 5/3/2026 at 07:21 [7:21 AM] blood pressure was 162/92, on 5/3/2026 at 17:26 [5:26 PM] blood pressure was 156/92, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide laboratory and diagnostic testing as ordered for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for laboratory services (Resident #11 and #74).Finding including:1) Review of Resident #11's physician order dated 6/8/2026 read, UA [urine analysis] & culture take sample on 06/11/2026.Review of Resident #11's laboratory documentation did not document a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity dated 6/11/2026.During an interview on 6/17/2026 at 9:33 AM Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse stated, I spoke to the provider yesterday [6/16/2026]. I saw the order and asked the patient [Resident #11] he had no signs and symptoms and I called the provider. I didn't see any results in the system. Generally, we collect the sample the same day. During an interview on 6/17/2026 at 9:48 AM the Advance Practice Registered Nurse #3 stated, I spoke to [Staff C's name] yesterday and I said the patient was stable and the UA could be discontinued. I would say there is no set time for collection some patients will not void on demand. I would logically have to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection by not donning personal protective equipment when providing direct care for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #37, reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions and failing to performed hand hygiene during mealtime for Residents #55 and #42. Finding including: 1) During an observation on 6/16/2026 at 8:15 AM on the outside of Resident #37's room door there was an Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign. Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered with Resident #37's breakfast tray and placed it on the bedside table. Without wearing gloves or a gown Staff E began to reposition Resident #37 in bed. Staff E reposition Resident #37's pillow and proceeded to readjust the resident's head on the pillow. 2) During an observation on 6/16/2026 at 12:31 PM Staff E, CNA entered Resident #55's room and removed the lunch tray from the room. Staff E return to the tray cart and placed Resident #55's tray inside the cart. Without performing hand hygiene Staff E walked over to Resident #42's room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit accurate direct care staffing information to CMS for the fourth quarter of 2024. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for the fourth quarter of 2024 (July 1 - September 30) showed low weekend registered nurse (RN) staffing for Saturday and Sunday on September 7-8, 2024. During an interview on 1/28/2025 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator stated, The PBJ staffing trigger of low weekend staffing for nurses was because an RN who was covering for the RN Supervisor on the weekend of September 7th and 8th, while the weekend supervisor was on vacation was coded for another sister facility and not here at this facility. Upon request, the Administrator did not provide a policy and procedure on PBJ submission. During an interview on 1/29/2025 at 8:16 AM, Staff D, RN, stated, I worked at the Club back in September, the first weekend to cover for the weekend supervisor. My hours worked were coded for the facility I normally work in and not for the Club.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 12/25/2024 showed it read, House Nutritional Supplement two times a day for Nutritional Supplement, risk of malnutrition, Offer 240 ml and document amount consumed. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 12/25/2024 showed it read, House Protein two times a day for risk of malnutrition, Offer 30 ml and document amount consumed. Review of Resident #1's medication administration record for January 2025 showed no entries documented for the amount of House Protein consumed or the amount of House Nutritional Supplement consumed from 1/1/2025 through 1/27/2025. Review of Resident #38's physician order dated 1/1/2025 showed it read, House Nutritional Supplement two times a day for Nutritional supplement, risk of malnutrition, Offer 240 ml and document amount consumed. Review of Resident #38's physician order dated 1/2/2025 showed it read, House Protein two times a day for risk of malnutrition, offer 30 ml and document amount consumed. Review of Resident #38's medication administration record for January 2025 showed no entries documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for significant weight loss, Resident #38. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy, unspecified dementia, acute kidney failure and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #38's Weights and Vitals Summary showed the resident weighed 76.4 lbs. (pounds) on 12/30/2024, and 71.2 lbs. on 1/4/2025, which indicates -6.44% loss. The resident's weight on 1/11/2025 was 66.9 lbs., which indicates -12.09% loss compared to the weight on 12/30/2024, and the resident's weight on 1/25/2025 was 62.2 lbs., which indicates -18.59% loss compared to the weight on 12/30/2024. Review of Resident #38's dietary profile dated 1/2/2025 showed it read, New admit. Nutrition Evaluation and recommendations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #17. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and acute kidney failure. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed it read, Section K- Swallowing/Nutritional Status . K0310. Weight Gain: Gain of 5% or more in the last month or gain of 10% or more in last 6 months . 2. Yes, not on physician-prescribed weight-gain regiment. Section K did not indicate the resident was on therapeutic diet. Review of Resident #17's progress note dated 12/27/2024 showed it read, Weight Note. 12/18: 118.8# [pounds], 7/30/2024: 134.6#. Weight loss of 11.7% in 6 months. Review of Resident #17's physician order dated 12/2/2024 showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL