Plaza Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 288 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 284 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 175.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate records for 1 of 4 residents, Resident #6, reviewed for intravenous medication management.Findings include: Review of Resident #6's nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] read, Section 12. Intravenous Access Devices: 1. Does the resident have a vascular device in place? Yes. What type of device is present? a) PICC [peripherally inserted central catheter] Line. Review of Resident #6's physician order dated 11/06/2025 read, PICC line can be removed at the end of IV [intravenous] [NAME] [antibiotics]. Review of Resident #6's physician order dated 11/6/2025 read, Piperacillin Sod-Tazobactam [antibiotic] solution reconstituted 3-0.375 GM [gram] use 3.375 gram intravenously [IV] every 6 hours for ESBL [extended-spectrum beta-lactamase] Pseudomonas until 12/05/2025 05:59. Review of Resident #6's care plan dated 11/05/2025 read, Focus: [Resident #6's name] is at risk for complications r/t [related to] receiving IV therapy.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-05 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate assessments for the residents with newly diagnosed mental disorders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #8 and #16).Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #8's admission record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (onset date of 12/20/2023), anxiety disorder (onset date of 9/19/2023), bipolar disorder (onset date of 4/22/2025), major depressive disorder (onset date of 4/22/2025), generalized anxiety disorder (4/22/2025), and brief psychotic disorder (onset date of 10/17/2023). Review of Resident #8’s Care Plan Note from mental health provider with the date of service 8/26/2025 read, “Rationale behind diagnosis: MDD [Major Depressive Disorder], Recurrent: The history suggests that this patient has suffered from episodes of depression lasting for more than 2 weeks. The symptoms have caused significant distress and functional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered by physician for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #89).Findings include: Review of Resident #89's physician order dated 5/27/2025 read, Midodrine HCl Oral Tablet 2.5 MG [milligram] (Midodrine HCl), Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day for Orthostatic hypotension, Hold for SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] of greater than 130. Review of Resident #89's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2025 for administration of Midodrine HCl 2.5 MG tablet showed the following documentation: X for BP (blood pressure) and pulse and code 9 (other- see nurse's notes) on 7/8/2025 at 1:00 PM, 142/65 (systolic/diastolic blood pressure) for BP and 96 for pulse and checkmark for administration of the medication on 7/14/2025 at 5:00 PM, and X for BP and pulse and code 4 (held per parameters) on 7/27/2025 at 9:00 AM. Review of Resident #89's medical records showed no progress notes related to Midodrine HCl 2.5 MG tablet on 7/8/2025 at 1:00 PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a safe manner for 3 of 12 residents observed for meal service.Findings include:During a tour of the kitchen on 07/24/2025 at 12:15 PM, three black serving trays were observed in the dish cleaning area. The three trays were chipped resulting in sharp jagged edges. During an interview on 7/24/25 at 12:15 PM, the Food Services Director stated, Trays [food trays] with jagged edges could cause bleeding to the residents with fragile skin and should not be used.During an observation on 07/24/2025 at 4:55 PM, the dinner trays were being passed out to residents residing on the F Villa. Three of the food trays that were taken to residents' rooms were observed to have chips out of them resulting in jagged edges. (Photographic Evidence Obtained)

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge, Resident #172. Findings include: Review of Resident #172's physician order dated 3/19/2024 read, [Resident #172's name] will discharge home to wife on 3/23/24. Review of Resident #172's Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice dated 3/21/2024 showed the resident will be discharged home. Review of Resident #172's Discharge Interdisciplinary Summary signed on 3/25/2024 at 9:03 AM read, Home Health with hospital bed, 20-inch-high back wheelchair and Hoyer lift, discharged home. Review of Resident #172's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] read, A2105. Discharge Status . 04. Short Term General Hospital (acute hospital). During an interview on 6/19/2024 at 9:52 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated, The discharge status was coded wrong. It's an error. The patient was discharged home with home health and not the hospital. I should have coded the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line dressing was changed in accordance with professional standards of practice and intravenous (IV) site was assessed for 1 resident with PICC line, Resident #122 (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: Review of Resident #122's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include acute bronchitis, cellulitis of the left lower limb, sepsis, and pneumonia. During an observation on 6/17/2024 at 9:50 AM, Resident #122 had a midline IV line in his right arm. There was gauze under the transparent dressing covering the IV insertion site into the arm and the insertion site was not visible. The gauze had a small amount of dried red residue on it and the transparent dressing securing the IV and gauze to the arm was loose and raised from the arm at the bottom of the dressing. Review of Resident #122's physician order dated 6/13/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored, covered, labeled, or discarded in the areas of the kitchen walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer, and failed to maintain sanitary standards in the walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer and for the kitchen equipment (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During an observation while conducting the initial walk-through of the kitchen on 6/17/2024 at 9:00 AM with the Registered Dietician (RD), there was a large amount of ice buildup on the door and walls of the walk-in freezer and on two boxes of food stored on top shelf in the walk-in freezer. There was a large metal pan containing red gelatin with a serving scoop in the container. The pan of red gelatin was covered in a clear wrap with no identifying label or date. In the walk-in cooler, there was a large pot of a liquid substance with a clear plastic cover with no identifying label or date, a gallon of almond milk with initials of MB, and a large clear container with pasta type food with no identifying label with a date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure complete medical records were maintained for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for laboratory result reporting, Residents #34 and #128. Findings include: Review of Resident #34's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include multiple sclerosis, other sequelae following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, stage 2 (mild) chronic kidney disease, unspecified combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #34's physician order dated 6/12/2024 read, U/A [urinalysis] with C&S [Culture and Sensitivity] one time only for odor. Review of Resident #34's lab results reported on 6/15/2024 at 12:18 PM read, Urine Culture: Growth/col [colony]/cnt [count].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #117, Resident #122) reviewed for gastrostomy tubes. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 2/22/2023 at 9:18 AM with Staff F, License Practical Nurse (LPN), Resident #117 was lying in bed with a gastrotomy tube observed on the left side of abdomen with dressing dated 2/22/2023. Review of Resident #117's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE], Section K, Swallowing/ Nutritional Status reads, K0510 Nutritional Approaches, B. Feeding tube-nasogastric or abdominal (PEG) [Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy] 2. While a Resident: 0. Not Checked (No). Locked and accepted on 02/03/2023. Review of Resident #117's MDS Medicare-5 Day assessment dated [DATE], Section K Swallowing/ Nutritional Status reads, K0510 Nutritional Approaches, B. Feeding tube-nasogastric or abdominal (PEG) [Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy] 2. While a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for peripheral intravenous catheters (Resident #406 and Resident #413). Photographic evidence obtained. Findings include: (1) During an observation on 2/20/23 at 9:45 AM, Resident #406 had a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter site to the left wrist. There was tape and clear dressing over the site, but no date noted. During an interview on 2/20/23 at 9:45 AM, Resident #406 stated, This [peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter] was put in by a paramedic before I came here. During an interview on 2/20/23 at 3:20 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/ Infection Preventionist confirmed there was no date on the bandage and stated, I would expect an IV site to have a date on the bandage. The intravenous site bandage should be changed every three days. I cannot tell when this was last changed. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL