No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Villa Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

120 Chipola Ave, Deland, FL 32720 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (386) 738-3433 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (386) 738-3433 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 13 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1205 S WOODLAND Blvd · (386) 202-6025 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2497 S Woodland Blvd · (386) 736-9001 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
955 S Woodland Blvd · (386) 624-0678 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1121 S Clara Ave · (386) 736-5953 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1706 S Woodland Blvd · (386) 218-6811

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.5%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.7%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.7%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.3%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.5%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.5%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.8%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.1%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.092.131.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.401.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 128 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.4%CMS range 45.4–61.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.9–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified0.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting15.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.3–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
38.9%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-18)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL), specifically nail care, received necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (Resident #59) of a total survey sample of 32 residents.The findings include: On 09/15/25 at 2:00 PM, an observation was made of Resident #59's fingernails, which had grown approximately 1/2 to ¾ inch beyond the tip of the nailbed on both her right and left hands. The resident reported that she did not like her fingernails as long as they were, and that she was afraid she might scratch herself with such long nails. She could not recall whether or not staff had offered to trim her fingernails. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 09/16/25 at 11:41 PM, a second observation was made of Resident #59's fingernails, which had grown approximately 1/2 to ¾ inch beyond the tip of the nailbed on both her right and left hands. They appeared the same as they had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately store resident's medication by leaving medication at bedside for one (Resident #4) of three residents sampled for unsecured medication. Resident #4 who had not been assessed for self-administration of medication was observed taking medications that had been left on his overbed table. These medications were also accessible to other residents who should not have access to them. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #4 on 04/23/2025 at 10:22 AM, the resident picked up a medicine cup from his overbed table containing multiple pills in it. When asked if the pills were his morning medications he stated, yes and then took them. A medical record review for Resident #4 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15, indicating intact cognition. A review of medication to be given to Resident #4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality for one (Resident #74) of 28 residents in the total sample. Professional standards of quality means that care and services are provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice. The findings include: During medication reconciliation completed for Resident #74, an order was reviewed, which read: Start date 5/23/23: Midodrine 5 milligrams (mg): Give 5 mg by mouth one time a day for low blood pressure; hold if systolic blood pressure is greater than 120. Further review of the medical record included the Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR), which revealed this medication was signed off as having been administered 44 times when the SBP was recorded above 120 mmhg (millimeters of mercury), out of 128 doses signed off as administered from the resident's date of admission through the date of medication reconciliation. The record review revealed a SBP greater than 120 on the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing for one (Resident #26) of 12 residents receiving pressure ulcer treatment, from a total sample of 28 residents. The findings include: On 9/27/23 at 11:50 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) A was observed preparing wound care supplies from the treatment cart for Resident #26. He dispensed Zinc Oxide 20% into a small medication cup. He was asked to explain the treatment order. He stated, It's Zinc Oxide ointment to his sacral area daily. RN A rubbed the Zinc Oxide ointment 20% on Resident #26's sacral area. The area was reddened and dusky in color. When RN A returned to the treatment cart, he was asked to look at the tube of Zinc Oxide ointment. He took it from the cart. He was asked what percent of Zinc Oxide the order was for. He stated, I'm not 100% sure; I know it's for Zinc. He was asked how he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure that residents who needed respiratory care, received oxygen therapy as ordered for two (Residents #11 and #43) of 18 residents receiving oxygen therapy from a total sample of 28 residents. The findings include: 1. On 9/25/23 at 12:05 p.m., Resident #11 was observed lying in bed with the TV on, her eyes closed, and receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 2.5 Liters per minute (L/min). (Photographic evidence obtained) A review of her medical record's active orders revealed a 2/9/23 physician's order for Oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula every shift. Further review of the physician's orders revealed the following: A 2/9/23 order: Change oxygen tubing weekly and PRN (as needed) every night shift, every Sunday. A 2/9/23 order: Albuterol Sulfate Nebulization Solution (2.5 mg/3ml) 0.083%, 1 application inhale orally via nebulizer every 6 hours as needed for shortness of breath (SOB). A 2/9/23 order: Budesonide Inhalation Suspension 0.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that it's medication error rate was not 5% or greater. There were two errors with 28 opportunities for error resulting in an error rate of 7.14% and affecting one (Resident #74) of eight residents observed during medication administration. The findings include: On 9/26/23 at 9:30 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B was observed preparing medications for Resident #74. LPN B administered the oral medications first, then set up a nebulizer inhalation treatment: Budesonide Inhalation: 0.5 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (ml) suspension. LPN B placed the inhalation mask over the resident's mouth and nose. She then told the resident she would return in 10 minutes to remove the mask. After 10 minutes had passed, LPN B returned and removed the mask. She was asked if she had completed medication administration for Resident #74. She stated yes. LPN B did not offer Resident #74 water or instruct her to rinse her mouth and spit after completing the inhalation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure its residents remained free of significant medication errors. This impacted one (Resident #74) of eight residents observed during medication administration, out of 28 residents in the total sample. Resident #74 received medication for low blood pressure outside of the ordered parameters for 44 of 128 doses administered. The findings include: During medication reconciliation completed for Resident #74, an order was reviewed, which read: Start date 5/23/23: Midodrine 5 milligrams (mg): Give 5 mg by mouth one time a day for low blood pressure; hold if systolic blood pressure is greater than 120. Further review of the medical record included the Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR), which revealed this medication was signed off as having been administered 44 times when the SBP was recorded above 120 mmhg (millimeters of mercury), out of 128 doses signed off as administered from the resident's date of admission through the date of medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy and procedure for Standards and Guidelines for Wound Care, the facility failed to ensure that resident medical records were complete and accurately documented, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for two (Residents #65 and #26) of 12 residents receiving pressure ulcer treatment, from a total sample of 28 residents. The findings include: 1. An observation of Resident #65 was made on 9/25/23 at 3:00 p.m. She was observed lying in bed with an air mattress, positioned with pillows. The resident's medical record was reviewed and revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included the following: mild protein calorie malnutrition, unspecified contact dermatitis, and osteomyelitis of sacral and sacracoccygeal region. Her care plan was reviewed and noted that she had a pressure ulcer of the sacral area which reopened in December 2022. A 9/27/23 physician's treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures for Infection Control and Guidelines for Wound Care, the facility failed to prevent the potential development and transmission of infection by not following infection prevention techniques during a wound dressing change for one (Resident #65) of three residents observed during wound care, from a total sample of 28 residents. The findings include: An observation of Resident #65 was made on 9/25/23 at 3:00 p.m. She was observed lying in bed with an air mattress, positioned with pillows. The resident's medical record was reviewed and revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included the following: mild protein calorie malnutrition, unspecified contact dermatitis, and osteomyelitis of sacral and sacrococcygeal region. Her care plan was reviewed, and it noted that she had a pressure ulcer of the sacral area which reopened in December 2022. A 9/27/23 physician's treatment order was reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and employee interviews, the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, by failing to practice appropriate hand hygiene and glove use during food preparation activities to prevent cross-contamination. This failure potentially affected all residents receiving food from the facility's kitchen. The findings include: A food service observation was conducted in the kitchen at 11:55 AM on 12/2/2021. At 12:00 PM, the Chef was observed setting up the food items for lunch service. The Chef was observed with a pair of gloves on during the set up. He was observed pouring the sauce for the meal from a pot into a stainless steel pan, then taking the pot to the dishwashing area and rinsing it out with the hand-held nozzle. He then returned to the food service area and began to stir the sauce in the the stainless steel pan without doffing the gloves, washing or sanitizing his hands, and donning a new pair of clean gloves. At 12:07 PM on 12/2/2021, the Chef was interviewed about hand hygiene while in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed hearing and vision deficits for one (Resident #32) of 41 residents in the sample. The findings include: On November 29, 2021 at 12:10 p.m., Resident # 32 was observed sitting on the edge of her bed, clipping her nails. She was unaware of the knocking on her door and calling her name for permission to enter. When her name was called out somewhat louder, she looked up and stated, I didn't hear you. I'm almost deaf. She was asked if she had hearing aides or a communication board. She stated, No. I've been here three months. I need to see a specialist; I keep telling them that but nothing happens. I used to have hearing aides, but I lost one and the other broke. The girl from therapy gave me this thing (amplifier with headphones), but it doesn't work, even with new batteries. My daughter bought this thing (hearing aide-looking device for one ear from a box marked amplifier), but it doesn't work either, even with new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident/resident representative interviews, and a review of resident and facility records, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent for grooming and hygiene, received the appropriate nail care to prevent soiled, jagged or excessively long nails for three (Residents #9, #35 and #78) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), from a total of 41 residents in the sample. The findings include: 1. A record review for Resident #9 found an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/27/21. It noted Resident #9 was not able to make himself understood. He had memory problems to include no recall of staff names, the current season, his room location or that he was in a nursing facility. Resident #9 had moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. There was no rejection of care over the assessment look-back period. Resident #9 required extensive assistance with hygiene. His diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia (a disease that progressively destroys…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered as ordered by the physician for one (Resident #65) of nine sampled residents reviewed for oxygen therapy from a total sample of 41. The findings include: A review of Resident #65's medical record revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: cerebral infarction, aphasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation. She required total assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs) except eating. She was ordered continuous oxygen at 1 liter per minute via nasal cannula. An observation of Resident #65's oxygen concentrator on 11/29/21 at 10:55 AM, found the oxygen rate was set at 2 liters per minute. An observation of the oxygen concentrator on 11/30/21 at 12:20 PM, found the flow rate set at 2.5 liters per minute. On 12/2/21 at 2:15 PM, the oxygen flow rate was set at 2.5 liters per minute. An interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alhambra Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 1 of 5Lady Lake Specialty Care Center and RehabLady Lake, FL 2 of 5Cypress Care CenterWildwood, FL 2 of 5Lehigh Acres Healthcare & Rehab CenterLehigh Acres, FL 2 of 5North Beach Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterNorth Miami Beach, FL 2 of 5Park Meadows Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterGainesville, FL 2 of 5Rockledge Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterRockledge, FL 2 of 5Sunset Lake Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVenice, FL 2 of 5Village Place Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterPort Charlotte, FL 2 of 5Villages Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center, TheLady Lake, FL 3 of 5Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 3 of 5Club Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center At The VThe Villages, FL 3 of 5Greenbriar Healthcare Rehabilitation And Nursing CBradenton, FL 3 of 5Grove Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center And RehHernando, FL 3 of 5Lexington Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 3 of 5Shore Acres Care Center And RehabSaint Petersburg, FL 3 of 5South Campus Care Center And RehabLeesburg, FL 3 of 5The Club At Lake GibsonLakeland, FL 3 of 5Viera Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterViera, FL 4 of 5Advanced Care CenterClearwater, FL 4 of 5Lakes Of Clermont Health And Rehabilitation CenterClermont, FL 4 of 5North Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 4 of 5North Lake Care Center And RehabLake Park, FL 4 of 5Ridgecrest Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDeland, FL 4 of 5The Lodge Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterOcala, FL 4 of 5Wilton Manors Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWilton Manors, FL 5 of 5Carlton Shores Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenteDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Isle Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterOrange Park, FL 5 of 5Kendall Lakes Healthcare And Rehab CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Plaza Health And RehabGainesville, FL 5 of 5Ponce Therapy Care Center And Rehab, TheSaint Augustine, FL 5 of 5Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterGainesville, FL 5 of 5Unity Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Woodland Grove Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterJacksonville, FL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
VILLA SNF HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/23/2022
FL MASTER OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/27/2022
ZABELE, MARYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/27/2022
SHELBY, JACKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/27/2022

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 15%Other / private 21%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,503per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$352per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105930. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next