Park Meadows Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
3250 SW 41st Place, Gainesville, FL 32608 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 148 certified beds · (352) 378-1558 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
- inspectors cited 8 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-15)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.8% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.9% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.0% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.8% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.9% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.2% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.8% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.7% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.27 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.79 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 111 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.6%CMS range 28.2–54.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.8%CMS range 6.2–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 78.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.5–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 143.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents and hazards when residents were served an inappropriate therapeutic diet for 1 (Resident #45) of 10 residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident #45 had a physician's order for a mechanical soft diet. On 10/15/2024 at 12:20 PM, Resident #45 was sitting in the dining room. Resident #45 requested an alternative food item from Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse. Staff J went to the kitchen and returned with a hot dog in a hot dog bun on a plate. Resident #45's diet was not verified in the kitchen. Staff I, Registered Nurse, stated to Staff J Resident #45 was not supposed to have a hot dog. Neither Staff I nor Staff J removed the food item after identifying the error. Staff I again instructed Staff J Resident #45 was not supposed to have a hot dog. Staff I and Staff J did not remove the food item. Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant cut the hot dog in half for Resident #45 to consume. Resident #45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food designed to meet individual needs for 1 (Resident #45) of 10 residents sampled who required mechanically altered diets. Resident #45 had a physician's order for a mechanical soft diet. On 10/15/2024 at 12:20 PM, Resident #45 was sitting in the dining room. Resident #45 requested an alternative food item from Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse. Staff J went to the kitchen and returned with a hot dog in a hot dog bun on a plate. Resident #45's diet was not verified in the kitchen. Staff I, Registered Nurse, stated to Staff J Resident #45 was not supposed to have a hot dog. Neither Staff I nor Staff J removed the food item after identifying the error. Staff I again instructed Staff J Resident #45 was not supposed to have a hot dog. Staff I and Staff J did not remove the food item. Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant, cut the hot dog in half for Resident #45 to consume. Resident #45 consumed the hot dog. The facility's failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident by failing to implement policies and procedures related to therapeutic diets. Resident #45 had a physician's order for a mechanical soft diet. On 10/15/2024 at 12:20 PM, Resident #45 was sitting in the dining room. Resident #45 requested an alternative food item from Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse. Staff J went to the kitchen and returned with a hot dog in a hot dog bun on a plate. Resident #45's diet was not verified in the kitchen. Staff I, Registered Nurse, stated to Staff J, Resident #45 was not supposed to have a hot dog. Neither Staff I nor Staff J removed the food item after identifying the error. Staff I again instructed Staff J Resident #45 was not supposed to have a hot dog. Staff I and Staff J did not remove the food item. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to utilize the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to investigate, develop and implement an effective performance improvement plan (PIP) when the facility identified policies and procedures were not implemented for modified consistency diets. On 10/15/2024 at 12:20 PM, Resident #45 was sitting in the dining room. Resident #45 requested an alternative food item from Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse. Staff J went to the kitchen and returned with a hot dog in a hot dog bun on a plate. Resident #45's diet was not verified in the kitchen. Staff I, Registered Nurse, stated to Staff J Resident #45 was not supposed to have a hot dog. Neither Staff I nor Staff J removed the food item after identifying the error. Staff I again instructed Staff J Resident #45 was not supposed to have a hot dog. Staff I and Staff J did not remove the food item. Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant cut the hot dog in half for Resident #45 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from medical neglect when the staff failed to notify the physician of elevated blood sugars for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #13, and failed to follow physicians' orders for the administration of long-acting insulin for 3 of 5 residents, Residents #100, #4, and #5, reviewed for long-acting insulin administration. The body must have insulin working 24 hours a day. If there is no glargine [Lantus/Detemir] and you have not given rapid acting insulin within the past 3-4 hours, it is likely that your body will make ketones and is at risk of developing life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Syndrome (HHS) which as similar symptoms, causes, and treatments of DKA. DKA is caused by an overload of ketones present in your blood. When your cells don't get the glucose they need for energy, your body begins to burn fat for energy, which produces ketones. Ketones are chemicals that the body creates when it breaks down fat to use for energy. Diabetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to notify the physician of changes in condition for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #13, and failed to follow physicians' orders for the administration of long-acting insulins for 3 of 5 residents, Residents #100, #4, and #5. The body must have insulin working 24 hours a day. If there is no glargine [Lantus/Detemir] and you have not given rapid acting insulin within the past 3-4 hours, it is likely that your body will make ketones and is at risk of developing life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Syndrome (HHS) which as similar symptoms, causes, and treatments of DKA. DKA is caused by an overload of ketones present in your blood. When your cells don't get the glucose they need for energy, your body begins to burn fat for energy, which produces ketones. Ketones are chemicals that the body creates when it breaks down fat to use for energy. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility administration failed to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing of each resident when not assuming full responsibility for the day-to-day operations of the facility and failing to effectively implement a QAPI/QAA plan. The administration failed to identify medication errors for residents who were not administered long-acting insulin as ordered by the physician and failed to ensure physician notification when medication orders were not followed and residents had change of condition for 4 of 7 residents, Resident #13, #100, #4, and #5. The body must have insulin working 24 hours a day. If there is no glargine [Lantus/Detemir] and you have not given rapid acting insulin within the past 3-4 hours, it is likely that your body will make ketones and is at risk of developing life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Syndrome (HHS) which as similar symptoms, causes, and treatments of DKA. DKA is caused by an overload of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to take actions to fully implement a developed plan of correction and Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), which resulted in the facility's failure to identify licensed staff was not following physicians' orders for notification of elevated blood sugars for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #13, and failure to identify medication errors for 3 of 5 residents, Residents #100, #4 and #5, who were not administered physician ordered long-acting insulin. The body must have insulin working 24 hours a day. If there is no glargine [Lantus/Detemir] and you have not given rapid acting insulin within the past 3-4 hours, it is likely that your body will make ketones and is at risk of developing life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Syndrome (HHS) which as similar symptoms, causes, and treatments of DKA. DKA is caused by an overload of ketones present in your blood. When your cells don't get the glucose they need for energy, your body begins to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #67), 1 of 2 residents reviewed for communication (Resident #112), 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident #12), and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for infections (Resident #10).Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #67's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident is taking diuretics under Section N- Medications. Review of Resident #67's physician orders showed no order for diuretics. Review of Resident #67's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2026 showed no diuretics were administered. During an interview on 4/23/2026 at 10:21 AM, Staff D, MDS Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, [Resident #67's name] is currently taking Hydralazine. Review of Resident #67's physician order dated 5/29/2024 read, Hydralazine HCl [hydrochloride] Tablet 50 MG [milligram], Give 50 mg by mouth three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and clean homelike environment for 2 of 5 residents reviewed, Residents #87 and #66. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 4/20/2026 at 1:45 PM, Resident #87 had his right arm in a splint and was using his left arm and hand to move items in the room. The pull string to turn on the light over the resident's bed was not within reach of the resident. The pull string does not reach the bed (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 4/20/2026 at 1:45 PM, Resident #87 voiced concerns about not being able to reach the pull string to turn on the light that was over his bed. He commented he had spoken to maintenance and administration. Review of Resident #87's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side. During an observation on 4/21/2026 at approximately 1:00 PM, the pull…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for the residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for behavioral health (Residents #13 and #117).Findings include:1) Review of Resident #117's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include brief psychotic disorder (onset date of 2/26/2026), other recurrent depressive disorders (onset date of 2/26/2026), and post-traumatic stress disorder (onset date of 2/25/2026).Review of Resident #117's PASRR dated 1/27/2026 showed anxiety disorder and depressive disorder documented under mental illness or suspected mental illness in Section I. PASRR Screen Decision-Making. No brief psychotic disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder was documented.Review of Resident #117's psychiatry subsequent note dated 3/23/2026 read, Chief Complaint: Brief psychosis and depression.Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident-centered care plans were developed and implemented for 4 of 33 residents reviewed (Residents #11, #58, #39, and #112).Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #11's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, overactive bladder, and other artificial openings of urinary tract status, and acute candidiasis of vulva and vagina. Review of Resident #11's care plan read, Focus: The resident has an artificial opening for bowel elimination (ostomy). Date initiated: 11/27/2025. Revision on: 03/05/2026. Interventions: Report any changes in bowel output to nurse such as swollen abdomen, resident complaining of pain, any change in color or consistency of the output. During an interview on 4/23/2026 at approximately 11:45 AM, Staff C, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received their medications as prescribed by their physician for 2 of 10 residents reviewed for medication management (Residents #90, and #93) and failed to ensure the wound dressings were changed for 2 of 4 reviewed for skin conditions (Residents #112 and #119).Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #93's physician order dated 2/28/2026 read, Insulin Glargine Solution 100 units per milliliter (units/mL), inject 10 units subcutaneously once daily for diabetes; notify physician for blood sugar less than 70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Review of Resident #93's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for administration of Insulin Glargine for March 2026 showed the medication was held by Staff CC, Registered Nurse (RN), on the following dates: 3/2/2026 for blood sugar of 82 mg/dL; 3/3/2026 for blood sugar of 105 mg/dL; 3/6/2026 for blood sugar of 96 mg/dL; 3/9/2026 for blood sugar of 103 mg/dL; 3/10/2026 for blood sugar of 117 mg/dL; 3/11/2026 with no documented blood sugar; 3/13/2026 with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services to maintain or improve mobility for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for therapy services (Resident #16).Findings include:During an observation on 4/20/2026 at 10:33 AM, Resident #16 was sitting in a wheelchair next to his bed. The resident was not wearing a splint, or an AFO (Ankle Foot Orthoses).During an observation on 4/21/2026 at 11:05 AM, Resident #16 was sitting in a wheelchair at the nurses' station. The resident was not wearing an AFO.During an interview on 4/22/2026 at 2:52 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, [Resident #16's name] is often up in his wheelchair when I come in at 7:00 AM and is not always wearing his AFO. Staff A was not able to provide any specific dates.During an observation on 4/22/2026 at 3:00 PM, Resident #16 was lying in bed. The resident was not wearing an AFO. There was an AFO stored on a shelf in the closet.Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and hazard-free environment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #39).Findings include: During an observation on 4/20/2026 at 10:15 AM, there was a disposable razor on the back of Resident #39's bathroom sink (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 4/21/2026 at 1:25 PM, there was a black disposable razor on the sink in Resident #39's bathroom. During an interview on 4/21/2026 at 1:27 PM, Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated that Resident #39 was using the razor earlier that day, and Resident #39 was somewhat independent. During an interview on 4/21/2026 at 3:00 PM, Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated that Resident #39 was mostly independent, he was steady, he moved on his own, and he shaved himself. During an interview on 4/21/2026 at 3:13 PM, Staff H, LPN Unit Manager, stated that Resident #39 was mostly independent. Residents should be observed while shaving and the razor should be disposed of after the resident shaved. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate enteral feeding for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition and dining services (Resident #58).Findings include:During an observation on 4/20/2026 at 10:05 AM, Resident #58 was lying in bed. The resident's tube feeding pump was alarming. The bottle of enteral feeding was dated 4/18/2026, and the bag of water attached was dated 4/15/2026 (Photographic evidence obtained).During an interview on 4/22/2026 at 10:20 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated that more than likely when the bottle of enteral feeding was low, they would change the set-up. Changing [of the bottle and tubing] was based on what was left in the bottle. She thought the set-up was good for 24 hours. She would look at what time it was actually hung.During an observation on 4/22/2026 at 2:40 PM, Staff A, LPN, attached the tubing for the enteral feeding, set the feeding pump according to the order and started the pump. Staff A did not check for residual prior to the initiation of the enteral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the providers acted upon the pharmacist recommendations for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #66 and #67).Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #66's Consultant Pharmacist Recommendation to Physician dated 9/17/2025 read, This resident is receiving the antipsychotic agent Quetiapine 100 mg po [orally] QHS [every night at bedtime] (9/11/25) but lacks an allowable diagnosis to support its use. Please adjust the diagnosis code as clinically indicated. There was no response or signature from the provider. Review of Resident #66's Pharmacist Recommendations (DON/Medical Director Copy)for recommendations created between 10/1/2025 and 10/28/2025 read, This resident is using the following duplicate antidepressant therapy. Paroxetine HCl Tablet 10 MG, Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day related to major depressant disorder. Active 09/18/2025. Trazodone HCl oral tablet 100 MG (Trazodone HCl), Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day for depression. Active 09/18/2025. There was no response or signature from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 2 of 8 residents reviewed (Residents #50 and #55).Findings include:1) Review of Resident #55's physician order dated 3/29/2026 read, Metoprolol Succinate ER [Extended Release] Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG [milligram] (Metoprolol Succinate), Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for HTN [hypertension], hold for SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] less than 110 or DBP [Diastolic Blood Pressure] less than 60.Review of Resident #55's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2026 for administration of Metoprolol Succinate showed the medication was administered on 4/7/2026 at 9:00 AM for blood pressure (BP) of 111/58 (SBP/DBP), 4/14/2026 at 9:00 PM for BP of 110/54, 4/15/2026 at 9:00 PM for BP of 93/51, 4/17/2026 at 9:00 PM for BP of 108/90, and 4/19/2026 at 9:00 PM for BP of 108/65.During an interview on 4/22/2026 at 1:28 PM, Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, I administered the medication in error.2) Review of Resident #50's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with accepted professional principles in 3 of 4 units.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 4/20/2026 at 9:59 AM, there were two vials of nebulizer treatment on top of Resident #137's drawer. During an observation on 4/21/2026 at 4:25 PM, there were two clear plastic ampules of nebulizer treatment on top of Resident #137's drawer. During an interview on 4/21/2026 at 4:58 PM, Staff W, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, [Resident #137's name] should not have medication at bedside. 2) During an observation on 4/20/2026 at 10:28 AM, there was zinc oxide ointment and packets of vitamin A and D ointment on top of Resident #59's drawer. During an interview on 4/20/2026 at 10:28 AM, Resident #59 stated, The nurses assist me to apply the ointment on my skin. During an interview on 4/21/2026 at 4:53 PM, Staff W, RN, stated, [Resident #59's name] should not have medications at bedside. 3) During an observation on 4/21/2026 at 11:00 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for laboratory services (Residents #96 and #97).Findings include:1) Review of Resident #97's provider visit note dated 3/19/2026 read, Today patient is being seen for a follow up visit related to AMS [Altered Mental Status] and possible UTI [Urinary Tract Infection]. Patient had a fall last night. On exam she seems slightly more confused and drowsy than her baseline. Assessment/Plan: AMS, Fall Last night, Possible UTI? order UA [urinalysis] with C&S [Culture and Sensitivity] today, send out stat, follow up after results-history of recurrent UTIs.Review of Resident #97's physician order dated 3/25/2026 read, UA C&S D/T [due to] increased confusion and urinary frequency one time only for Confusion for 1 Day.Review of eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record) note dated 3/26/2026 read, UA C&S D/T increased confusion and urinary frequency one time only for Confusion for 1 Day Pt [patient] Urine in Fridge.Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Residents #112 and #119).Findings include: 1) During an observation on 4/20/2026 at 10:14 AM, Resident #112 was sitting up in bed. There was a dressing dated 4/16/2026 on the left side of her neck (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 4/20/2026 at 10:14 AM, Resident #112 stated, Dermatology came to see me and decided to biopsy an area on my neck. During an observation on 4/21/2026 at 8:10 AM, Resident #112 was lying in bed. There was a dressing on the left side of the resident's neck dated 4/16/2026. During an interview on 4/21/2026 at 8:10 AM, Resident #112 stated, They have not changed my dressing. The nurse said she would change it today. Review of Resident #112's physician order dated 4/15/2026 read, Wound care left neck- wash with soap and water, pat dry, apply petroleum jelly, cover with nonstick bandage every day shift for biopsy site for 7 days. Review of Resident #112's Treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering a contact precautions room for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions (Resident #41), failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene while administering medication administration and providing care for 3 of 8 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #11, and #90), and failed to ensure respiratory care equipment were appropriately maintained for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory services (Residents #12 and #97), to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 4/21/2026 at 11:18 AM, Staff AA, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), entered Resident #41's room. Staff AA did not wear a gown or gloves. Resident #41's room had a contact-precaution sign posted on the door and a bin with PPE outside of the room. During an interview on 4/21/2026 at 11:30 AM, Staff AA, LPN, stated, I forgot. I saw the light and went in. I know I should were gloves and gown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 of 4 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 11/16/2024 read, Acidophilus Capsule 100 mg [milligrams] (Lactobacillus) give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for probiotic. Order status: Active. Start date: 11/16/2024.Review of Resident #1's MAR [Medication Administration Record] for December 2025 for the administration of Acidophilus Capsules showed no entry for 12/09/2025 at 1700 [5:00 PM].Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 11/16/2024 read, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Oral Tablet 500 mg (Ascorbic Acid) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for supplement. Order status: Active. Start date: 11/16/2024.Review of Resident #1's MAR for December 2025 for the administration of Ascorbic Acid tablet showed no entry for 12/09/2025 at 1700.Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 11/16/2024 read, Eliquis Oral Tablet 5 mg (Apixaban) (blood thinner) give 5 mg by mouth two times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an orderly and sanitary environment in 4 (100, 200, 300, 400) of 4 hallways. Findings include: During a tour of the facility on 3/29/25 at 9:17 AM, a buildup of trash and debris was observed on all hallways [100, 200, 300 and 400]. No housekeeping carts were observed during the tour. During a tour of the facility on 3/29/25 at 9:20 AM, in the 100 hallway, close to the exit leading to the smoking patio, there was significant debris observed on the floor, which consisted primarily of leaves, grass, and some small pieces of trash. An interview on 3/29/25 at 10:00 AM, Resident #6 stated that he does not see housekeeping very often. An interview on 3/29/25 at 10:10 AM, Resident #7 stated that housekeeping could be better. An interview on 3/29/25 at 10:17 AM, Resident #8 stated housekeeping was a 'joke.' During a tour of the facility on 3/29/25 at 11:30 AM, debris and trash was still observed on the floors of 100, 200, 300, and 400 hallways. No housekeeping carts were observed during the tour. During an observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the served food was at an appetizing temperature. Findings include: During an interview on 10/14/2024 at 10:25 AM, Resident #105 stated, Breakfast trays don't come sometimes until 9:30, instead of 8:00. When it gets here, the food is ice cold. During an interview on 10/14/2024 at 11:15 AM, Resident #109 stated, The food is ice cold when they pass the trays. During the test tray observation on 10/15/2024 at 12:42 PM, food was checked in the presence of Food Service Director in the 100 Hallway. A calibrated thermistor digital thermometer was utilized for the verification of the test tray. Food was placed on the tray and in the cart at 12:10 PM. Insulated cart left the kitchen at 12:14 PM. The test food tray was taken out of the cart as the last resident began to eat at 12:42 PM. There were 20 trays on the cart. Items on the tray included ravioli with meat sauce (temperature: 109 degrees Fahrenheit), Italian green beans (temperature: 89.6 degrees Fahrenheit) and an Italian breadstick. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, orderly, and comfortable environment in two of six shower rooms and in the memory care unit (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: 1) During an interview on 10/14/2024 at 9:55 AM, Resident #121 stated, The shower rooms are always dirty and full of mold. During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 2:00 PM, there was a black substance in a circular pattern on the ceiling over the shower area and a brown discoloration on the ceiling leading to the shower area in the 100 Hall Shower Room. During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 2:45 PM, there was a line of black substance spots on the ceiling over the area leading into the shower in the 500 Hall Shower Room. During an interview on 10/15/2024 at 2:46 PM, the Maintenance Director stated he was not aware of the black substance on either of the shower ceilings. 2) During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 10:00 AM, the hallway exterior exit door had a large piece of plywood attached to where glass would have been in the memory care unit. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls, Resident #43, and failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living, Resident #119. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 10/14/2024 at 9:38 AM, Resident #43 was lying in bed, with one fall mat on the left side of the bed in place. During an observation on 10/16/2024 at 4:50 AM, Resident #43 was sleeping in bed comfortably. There was one fall mat on the left side of the bed. Review of Resident #43's physician order dated 6/1/2023 read, Floor mats to both sides when resident in bed every day and evening shift. Review of Resident #43's care plan initiated on 12/13/2022 read, Focus: [Resident #43's name] is at risk for falls and/or fall related injury r/t [related to]: generalized weakness . Interventions: Floor mats to sides of bed. During an observation on 10/16/2024 at 8:32 AM with Staff C, Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received blood pressure medication as prescribed by physician for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #125. Findings include: Review of Resident #125's physician order dated 3/6/2024 read, Midodrine HCl Tablet 10 MG [milligram], Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for hypotension, Hold for SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] greater than 110. Review of Resident #125's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2024 for administration of Midodrine HCl Tablet 10 mg showed the medication was held per parameters on 10/2/2024 at 6:00 AM for the SBP of 101; and the mediation was administered on 10/3/2024 at 2:00 PM for SBP of 116, on 10/5/2024 at 2:00 PM for SBP of 122 and at 10:00 PM for SBP of 126, on 10/6/2024 at 2:00 PM for SBP of 124, and at 10:00 PM for SBP of 114; on 10/8/2024 at 2:00 PM for SBP of 127, on 10/10/2024 at 2:00 PM for SBP of 125, and at 10:00 PM for SBP of 123, and on 10/11/2024 at 2:00 PM for SBP of 112. During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 7:12 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received dietary services as prescribed by physician for 2 of 10 residents reviewed for nutrition, Residents #43 and #128. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 10/14/2024 at 12:15 PM, Resident #43 was eating lunch in the common dining room. The resident had a burger cut into four pieces and fruit punch in a glass. There was no frozen nutritional treat. During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 9:01 AM, Resident #43 was eating in his room. There was a glass of orange juice, two pieces of bacon, one boiled egg cut in half and a toast cut into four pieces. There was no frozen nutritional treat. During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 12:17 PM, Resident #43 was eating in the common dining room. The resident had a hot dog with a hot dog bun cut in half and a hash brown cut into sections. There was no drink or frozen nutritional treat. During an observation on 10/16/2024 at 12:10 PM, Resident #43 was eating penne pasta, meatballs, and brussels sprouts with a cup of coffee in the dining room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide laboratory services to meet the residents' needs for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication review, Resident #86. Findings include: Review of Resident #86's physician order dated 6/18/2024 read, HGBA1C [Hemoglobin A1c], Depakote level Q3 [every three] months. Review of Resident #86's medical record showed no documentation indicating laboratory done in September 2024. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 9:46 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, After reviewing the record, the lab was not done on [DATE]. We had them come out today and they draw her blood in the morning today. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Diagnostics Labs Radiology Notification with the last review date of 1/31/2024 read, Policy: It will be the policy of this facility to provide or obtain timely laboratory, radiology and diagnostic services when ordered by a physician; physician assistant (PA); nurse practitioner (NP) or clinical nurse specialist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #43. Findings include: During an observation on 10/14/2024 at 12:15 PM, Resident #43 was eating lunch in the common dining room. The resident had a burger cut into four pieces and fruit punch in a glass. There was no frozen nutritional treat. During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 9:01 AM, Resident #43 was eating in his room. There was a glass of orange juice, two pieces of bacon, one boiled egg cut in half and a toast cut into four pieces. There was no frozen nutritional treat. During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 12:17 PM, Resident #43 was eating in the common dining room. The resident had a hot dog with a hot dog bun cut in half and a hash brown cut into sections. There was no drink or frozen nutritional treat. During an observation on 10/16/2024 at 12:10 PM, Resident #43 was eating penne pasta, meatballs, and brussels sprouts with a cup of coffee in the dining room. There was no frozen nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during 2 of 7 observations of medication administration, failed to ensure staff sanitized reusable medical equipment, and failed to provide a clean storage for clean linen to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 3:10 PM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), took Resident #12's vitals without sanitizing the machine. Staff A proceeded to take Resident #22's vitals without cleaning the vital sign machine. Staff A exited the room and entered Resident #79's room and took the resident's vitals without sanitizing the machine. Staff A closed the door and exited the room, took the vital sign machine to the nursing station and left it by medication cart. During an interview on 10/15/2024 at 3:23 PM, Staff A, CNA, stated, I should wipe the machine between use with the wipes. I did not have in my cart so that is what I was going to go and get. I did have hand sanitizer for my hands in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record documented the resident was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (a heart attack), cellulitis of left lower leg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, bladder disorder, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the physician order dated 8/10/2023 read, U/A [urinalysis] with C&S [culture and sensitivity] one time only for UTI [urinary tract infection] until 8/10/2023 23:59 [11:59 PM]. Review of the physician order dated 8/11/2023 read, Cipro oral tablet 500 mg [milligrams] give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for infection. Review of the Lab Results titled Urine Culture Report dated 8/12/2023 at 12:15 PM read, Report information: Collection Date: 08/10/2023 03:36 [3:36 AM], Received date: 08/10/2023 16:15 [4:15 PM], Reported date: 08/12/2023 12:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for 3 out of 4 residents reviewed for discharge status, Residents #58, #141, and #143. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #58's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, muscle weakness, aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, anxiety disorder, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #58's Minimum Data Set (MDS)- Discharge Return Not Anticipated assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's discharge status as other. Review of Resident #58's Planned Discharge Summary with an effective date of 3/16/2023 showed the discharge date of 3/17/2023 to an assisted living facility. During an interview on 6/28/2023 at 1:44 PM, Staff B, Registered Nurse, Lead MDS, stated that Resident #58's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 out of 11 residents reviewed for respiratory services, Residents #114 and #38. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/26/2023 at 9:53 AM, Resident #114 was lying in bed. There was a passive nebulizer mask on top of the drawer behind the nebulizer machine unbagged. During an observation on 6/27/2023 at 8:05 AM, Resident #114 was lying in bed with the passive nebulizer mask lying on top of the drawer behind the nebulizer machine unbagged. During an observation on 6/27/2023 at 12:18 PM with Staff D, License Practical Nurse (LPN), the nebulizer mask was behind the nebulizer machine unbagged. During an interview on 6/27/2023 at 12:18 PM, Staff D, LPN, stated, He does not require my attention. He is able to do a lot of stuff on his own. I could bag the mask, but he can remove it. Review of Resident #114's admission record showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals were secured in the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 6/26/2023 at 9:43 AM, Resident #293 was lying in bed. There was one bottle of Tylenol, one bottle of Imodium and one bottle of melatonin on the drawer. During an interview on 6/26/2023 at 9:43 AM, Resident #293 stated, My husband brought these from home, so that I could take them. During an observation on 6/26/2023 at 10:03 AM, Resident #82 was lying in bed. There were three boxes of A&D ointment on the drawer. During an observation on 6/26/2023 at 10:06 AM, there was a normal saline syringe on the bedside table in Resident #135's room. During an interview on 6/26/2023 at 10:48 AM, Resident #135 stated, I used to have a wound and they would use that, but now I don't have a wound and they just left it here. During an interview on 6/29/2023 at 11:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, [names of Resident #293, #135, and #82] do not have an order in the system to self-administer medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the walk-in freezer (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 6/26/2023 beginning at 9:00 AM with Staff F, Visiting Kitchen Manager, there were one opened box with an unsealed bag containing Cinnamon Roll Dough and breaded squash, and a plastic container of frozen pureed protein with the lid off and the contents expanded out of the container on the top wire shelf in the walk-in freezer. During an interview on 6/26/2023 at 9:28 AM, Staff F, Visiting Kitchen Manager, confirmed there were opened boxes of food in the freezer and stated, Those [the opened bags in the boxes] should have been closed and this [frozen protein] should have been thrown out. Review of the policy and procedure titled Refrigerated Storage dated 1/1/2022 and last reviewed on 5/3/2023 read, Policy: Foods and Nutrition Services (FNS) staff should maintain safe refrigerated storage areas.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 2 out of 4 residents reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living, Residents #14, and #18. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, schizophrenia, muscle weakness, pain in right shoulder, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, chronic pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, acute kidney failure, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris, pseudobulbar affect, dementia, mood disorder, and hypertension. Review of Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS)- Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] read, G0120. Bathing . A. Bathing: Self-performance . 4. Total Dependence . B. Bathing: Support provided . 2. One person physical assist. Review of Resident #14's shower task list documentation for June 2023 revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the accepted infection control practice standards during tracheostomy care to prevent the possible development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 out 2 residents with tracheostomy, Resident #82. Findings include: During an observation on 6/26/2023 at 10:00 AM, Resident #82 was lying in bed with the eyes closed. Tracheostomy site did not have gauze and there was yellow drainage underneath the trach plate. During an observation on 6/27/2023 at 3:02 PM, Staff C, License Practical Nurse (LPN), entered Resident #82's room and washed her hands and proceeded to open tracheostomy kit placed on Resident #82 drawer. Staff C removed sterile glove package and placed them on top of Resident #82's bed linen. Staff C donned sterile gloves and proceeded to place sterile drape on top of Resident #82's abdominal area. Resident #82 started to move his arms and dragged sterile drape under his left arm. Staff C touched Resident #82's arm with both hands using sterile gloves and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,801 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,400 — penalty dated 2024-11-15
- $8,401 — penalty dated 2024-11-15
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARK MEADOWS SNF HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/23/2022 |
| FL MASTER OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/27/2022 |
| POWELL, KELVIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/27/2022 |
| SHELBY, JACK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/27/2022 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105193. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.