Shore Acres Care Center And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

26.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessments were completed accurately for five residents (#94, #47, #79, #90, and #87) of forty-four residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #94's admission Record revealed an original admission date of 2/4/24, and a re-admission date of 5/8/24. Resident #94's admission Record revealed diagnoses to include major depressive disorder, recurrent, mild with an onset date of 4/2/24, generalized anxiety disorder with an onset date of 4/2/24, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate with an onset date of 2/4/24. Review of Resident #94's PASRR Level 1, dated 2/13/24, revealed no qualifying mental health diagnosis. A review of the active Clinical Physician Orders, as of 5/30/2024, revealed the following: Duloxetine HCI 30 MG two times a day related to major depressive disorder, recurrent, mild. Start date 5/14/24. 2. Review of the admission record for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility 1) failed to ensure medications were available for two residents (#101 and #19) out of four residents sampled, 2) failed to assess a skin condition for one resident (#8) out of one resident sampled, and 3) failed to ensure neurological checks were completed for two residents (#105 and #79) out of four residents sampled. Findings included: 1. An observation and interview was conducted on 05/28/24 at 2:30 p.m. with Resident #101. He stated he used to be on antiretroviral medications and would like to be on them again. He stated he did not have a way to get his medications. He stated he wanted to stay on the medications. He stated he was taking them prior to a hospital stay but had not taken them since admission to this facility. A review of the admission record showed Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of [immune deficiency syndrome]. A review of Resident #101's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), revealed in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete for two residents (#104 and #106) out of three residents reviewed for leaving the facility against medical advice (AMA). Findings included: 1. An interview was conducted on 5/29/24 at 11:35 a.m. with a family member of Resident #104. She said Resident #104 signed out of the facility AMA and she was not notified. She said when she spoke with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) she was told they did not have any healthcare proxy on file. The family member stated Resident #104 had a history of mental illness and dementia and she doesn't feel like the facility assessed the resident's mental health. The family member said after the resident's admission, they emailed the facility the healthcare proxy as well as some medical history documents. Review of admission Records for Resident #104 showed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia affecting left dominant side, dizziness and giddiness, ataxia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility 1) failed to ensure an effective infection control program related to isolation orders for one resident (#95) out of two residents sampled on contact precautions, 2) failed to properly use personal protective equipment (PPE) on two out of four units, and 3) failed to use proper hand hygiene during tray pass on one out of four units. Findings included: 1. An observation was conducted on 5/28/24 at 9:26 a.m. of a housekeeper in room [ROOM NUMBER] with no PPE on. The room had a contact precaution sign posted on the door with no PPE cart at the door. (Photographic evidence obtained). Contact precaution signs were observed to be on room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], however they were not on the list provided by the facility as being on isolation precautions. An observation of meal service was conducted on 5/28/24 at 12:35 p.m. on the northwest hall. A CNA picked up a tray and delivered it to a resident. She set up the resident's food tray and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and resident representative were notified promptly of a change in condition for one resident (#105) out of 21 residents sampled. Findings included: Review of the admission Record for Resident #105 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the contact information showed the resident had a responsible party designated as the POA (Power of Attorney) and Emergency Contact #1. Review of a progress note for Resident #105, dated [DATE] at 05:59 a.m. showed the following: Note Text: Resident experiencing SOB [Shortness of breath], wheeled himself to the nurses' station, CNA [Certified Nurses Assistant] noted that the resident put himself to the floor, and laid down in the nurse's station. Nurse notified, resident assisted to w/c [wheelchair] as SOB increased. Returned to room with assist of 2 staff nurses. Vital Signs were 114/72 97.8 76 26 O2[oxygen] saturation 64%. Audible gurgling sounds in lungs, resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for one resident (#63) of 8 residents sampled for PASRR's. Findings included: A review of the admission record for Resident #63 revealed an original admission date of 12/30/21 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), and epilepsy. A review of Resident #63's Level I PASRR, dated 12/15/21, showed only a diagnoses of substance abuse and epilepsy were checked. A review of Resident #63's medical record revealed a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, on 05/22/22, and no documentation a PASRR Level II was completed. A review of Resident #63's medical record revealed a new diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia, on 05/17/24, and no documentation a PASRR Level II was completed. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 04:22 PM, the Social Services Director, (SSD) consultant stated the PASRR was not correct. She stated if the residents had a new diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure appropriate use of antibiotics for one resident (#79) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Findings included: Review of Medication Administration Records for Resident #79 revealed she was on antibiotics in January, February, and March of 2024 for a urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of admission records showed Resident #79 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's Disease, UTI, and hematuria. Review of Resident #79's Lab Results Report, dated 1/10/24 showed the resident had a UTI with bacteria resistant to Levofloxacin. Review of Resident #79's Physician orders showed the resident was ordered Levofloxacin 500mg for a UTI 5 days starting on 1/12/14. Review of Resident #79's Lab Results Report, dated 2/2/24, showed the Urinalysis had no growth. Review of Resident #79's Physician orders showed the resident was ordered Levofloxacin 500mg for a UTI for 5 days starting on 2/1/24. Review of Resident #79's Lab…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure one resident (#94) out of one resident sampled was offered timely dental services from an outside source. Findings included: On 5/28/24 at 12:20 p.m. Resident #94 was observed in bed in an upright position, conversing with her roommate Resident #82. Resident #94 expressed she had tooth pain from a broken tooth. Observed Resident #94 touching slightly above her lip and verbally indicated that is where the pain is. She stated she was using over the counter medication provided by a family member. She stated the facility would take the medication away if staff knew about it. During the interview, observed Resident #94 with a swab in her mouth and a small blue bottle labeled [vendor name] on the bedside table in front of her. She stated the swab was dipped in [vendor name] and the medication is to help alleviate the tooth pain. Review of Resident #94's admission Record revealed an original admission date of 2/4/24 and a re-admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety during three of four days of the survey. Findings included: On 02/22/2022 at 9:20 a.m., the initial kitchen tour was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), Staff A, Dietary Aide and Staff B, Cook. An observation was made of the reach in cooler thermometer, located in the back of the cooler on the third shelf, showing a temperature reading of 48 degrees. The digital thermometer on the top of the right door showed a reading of 52 degrees. Staff A, Dietary Aide stated that she was in and out putting items away for lunch and that was why the temperature was off. Inside the same cooler, a stack of white American cheese slices was observed wrapped in clear plastic without a label or date. An observation was made of food debris in the small creamer containers, and sugar packs found behind the reach in cooler. There were two opened and half used bottles of hot sauce with no date, and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #15) of 45 sampled residents by not scheduling a physician ordered appointment in a timely manner. Findings included: An interview was conducted with Resident #15 on 02/22/2022 at 2:38 p.m. Resident #15 stated that late in November 2021, she noticed a lump in the lower right-side of her abdomen. She stated that she had a hernia that was growing fast and she suffers from pain in her abdomen. She stated she expressed her concern to a nurse and asked her if she could schedule an appointment for her. She stated Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager had informed her that the facility doctor did not take her medical insurance but would continue to see if she could find one that accepted her insurance. Resident #15 stated she had suggested to Staff C that she could go to the local hospital where she had originally been treated. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL