No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rockledge Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

587 Barton Blvd, Rockledge, FL 32955 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 107 certified beds · (321) 632-6300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (321) 632-6300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jul 2023
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1295 US Highway 1 · (321) 637-6654 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
925 Barton Blvd · (321) 638-2482 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1007 Pathfinder Way · (321) 631-1444 · Call to confirm hours
Park
790 Barton Blvd · (321) 633-1870 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
566 Barton Blvd · (321) 637-7010

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.5%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.5%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%2.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication2.2%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.2%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.0%8.6%17.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.1%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.6%9.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.862.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.811.151.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.52U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.6%CMS range 40.8–60.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.0–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.1–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
38.9%
Total nursing turnover
64.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 97.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-03)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a medication self-administration assessment to ensure safety for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications, of a total sample of 51 residents, (#97). Findings: Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left tibia fracture, muscle weakness, and polyneuropathy. A review of the Minimum Data Set admission assessment with an assessment reference date of 3/05/25 revealed resident #97 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, which indicated that he was cognitively intact. On 4/02/25 at 10:09 AM, resident #97 was observed lying on his back in bed watching television. His bedside table was next to his bed with various personal items, including a box of Ocusoft Retaine MGD ophthalmic emulsion that contained 28 single doses (0.01 fluid ounces). The resident said he used the eye drops for his eyes. On 4/02/25 at 10:13 AM, the resident's bedside table was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike interior in 1 of 28 rooms, on 1 of 2 units, (East Wing, 103). Findings: On 3/31/25 at 11:45 AM, the first drawer of a nightstand was missing in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Subsequent observations on 4/01/25 at 11:33 AM and 4/02/25 at 3:10 PM, the first drawer of the nightstand was still missing. On 4/02/25 at 3:11 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) K explained she entered work orders to alert maintenance of needed repairs in resident's rooms. She stated the first drawer of the nightstand in room [ROOM NUMBER], had been broken for awhile and pointed to the top of a dresser where the drawer had been placed. She indicated maintenance was aware of the needed repair. On 4/02/25 at 4:45 PM, the Maintenance Director stated he was responsible for the functionality of everything in the facility. He explained the staff was supposed to enter work orders to let him know when something needed his attention. At 4:59 PM, the Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) results for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR, (#6, #8), and use of insulin for 1 of 1 resident (#97) reviewed for insulin, of a total sample of 50 residents. Findings: 1. Review of resident #6's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on 7/25/24. Her diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder- bipolar type, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of resident #6's annual MDS assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/14/24 revealed question A1500 on Section A read, Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASARR process to have serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability (ID) or a related condition? The documented answer was No. Review of resident #6's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the completion and accuracy of Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents on admission and/or failed to make referrals for newly evident or possible mental disorders/diagnoses to evaluate the need for specialized services or alternative placement for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for PASARRs, of a total sample of 51 residents, (#49,#79, #23, and #34). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnoses that included enlarged heart, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, sleep disorder, pain and major depressive disorder. Resident #49's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/18/25 revealed the resident scored 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated he had mild cognitive impairment. The assessment revealed resident #49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for oxygen (O2) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for O2 use, of a total sample of 50 residents, (#8). Findings: Review of resident #8's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, congestive heart failure (CHF), anemia, and shortness of breath. Review of resident #8's significant change in status Minimum Data Set assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 1/15/25 revealed she used O2. Review of resident #8's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 12/30/24 which read, Oxygen at 2 liters/minute (LPM) continuous, via NC (nasal canula) every shift. A care plan for a potential for complications of respiratory distress related to CHF and respiratory failure was initiated on 5/17/23. The interventions included, Administer medications as ordered; observe for effectiveness and for SEs (side effects). Administer O2 as ordered. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain adequate communication with the dialysis center, follow the comprehensive person-centered care plan and ensure post-dialysis assessments were completed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis, of a total sample of 51 residents, (#655). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #655 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with dependence on dialysis, and type 2 diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set Medicare 5-day assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 3/27/25 revealed resident #655's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 11 out of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The assessment showed the resident had no behavioral symptoms and did not reject evaluation or care that was necessary to achieve her goals for health and well-being. The assessment revealed resident #655 required hemodialysis.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to label drugs and biologicals safely and accurately, in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 7 residents observed for medication administration, of a total sample of 51 residents, (#305, and #7). Findings: 1. On 3/31/25 at 5:14 PM, during medication administration observation with Registered Nurse (RN) A on the [NAME] medication cart 2 it was noted that the medication on the Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) indicated Eliquis 5 milligrams (mg) give 1 tablet. The label on the actual medication instructed that 10 mg of Eliquis was to be administered. RN A did not administer the medication and stated he would call the physician to clarify the order. 2. On 4/01/25 at 9:14 AM, during medication administration observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B, on the South medication cart 2, there were discrepancies found with the medication label for two of resident #7's medications. The order on the eMAR read Sodium Chloride 1 gram and one tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate hand hygiene and personal protective equipment (PPE) practices per infection control standards; and failed to prevent cross contamination when handling trash. Findings: On 4/02/25 at 9:49 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J obtained a pair of gloves from a treatment cart. He donned the gloves without performing hand hygiene and entered a resident's room to assist the wound care nurse. A few minutes later on 4/02/25 at 9:53 AM, CNA J confirmed he was supposed to perform hand hygiene when donning and doffing gloves. He explained he had forgotten to do this but said it was important for sanitation and protection of the residents. On 4/02/25 at 2:58 PM, CNA J was observed at the doorway of room [ROOM NUMBER] holding a clear, plastic bag with trash in his right hand and wearing a personal backpack while talking to a staff member who was inside the room. He then entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and continued talking to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the right to make choices about significant aspects of activities of daily living related to preferred method of toileting (#250), and frequency and preferred method of bathing, (#9, #28, #307, #308, #252) for 6 of 8 residents reviewed for choices of a total sample of 44 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression, bipolar disorder, sleep apnea. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/14/23 revealed the resident's cognition was intact, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Resident #9 required limited assistance with one person for dressing, personal hygiene, and one-person physical assist for bathing. On 7/10/23 at 1:50 PM, resident # 9 stated she had not had a shower since she moved to this room. She said they brought a towel and wash cloth in for her to wash herself.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who smoked did not keep lighters or ignition materials on their person for 6 of 7 residents reviewed for smoking and failed to identify an accident hazard of a wet floor for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accidents, out of a total sample of 44 residents,(#6, #69, #75, #50, #303, #73, #26). Findings: 1. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, and type 2 diabetes. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/12/23 revealed the resident's cognition was intact, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15. On 7/10/23 at 1:33 PM, resident #50 said, I do smoke and I keep my cigarettes and lighter with me. On 7/11/23 at 12:51 PM, the resident stated she kept her cigarettes and lighter in her room in the drawer of the bedside table. She opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's administration failed to effectively utilize its resources to implement its smoking policy and procedures to provide adequate oversight of 16 smokers and ensure the safety of all residents in the facility. Findings: Cross reference F689. On 7/13/23 at 12:11 PM, the facility's Executive Director and Director of Nursing (DON) discussed the facility's protocols for safe smoking. The Executive Director explained residents who were identified as smokers on admission were evaluated by the nursing department to determine if they were physically and cognitively able to smoke safely. He stated the facility maintained an open smoking porch from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM daily. The Executive Director stated a staff member was always assigned to the designated smoking area to attend to and monitor the smokers. He explained the assigned staff member was responsible for retrieving smoking materials when residents finished smoking and he/she would place the items in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the performance improvement plan for education of nursing staff and implementation of following physician orders for oxygen for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy out of a total sample of 44 residents. Findings: Cross reference to F695 On 7/13/23 at 7:40 PM, during an interview with the Executive Director, and Director of Nursing (DON), the Executive Director stated that on 6/26/23, they implemented a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to ensure proper oxygen use. He stated education was started on 6/26/23 with nursing staff and had been ongoing along with conducting random audits. A request was made to review the in-service training along with subject matter covered and signature records of nursing staff from 6/26/23. The DON stated education was provided to nursing staff verbally on 6/26/23 and 6/27/23. The DON added that education was provided on a one to one basis with each nurse on all shifts for a total of 8 nurses. She reported there were no sign in sheet, and education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment in the laundry department to prevent cross-contamination of facility equipment and facility linens. Findings: An observation of the laundry department was conducted with the Housekeeping/Laundry Manager, Regional Housekeeping/Laundry Manager and Administrator In Training. The laundry's soiled linen sorting area had 6 covered bins containing soiled linen, an outdoor leaf blower, a floor cleaning/buffer machine which was plugged into the electrical socket, and battery and battery charger. The Laundry Manager explained it was a soiled room used for sorting the facility's soiled linens prior to washing. The Laundry Manager and Administrator in Training stated the leaf blower, the floor machine and battery charger should not be in the soiled room to prevent cross contamination. On 07/11/23 at approximately 12:50 PM, the laundry area containing the facility's 3 washing machines revealed all 3 washing machines were currently in process of washing soiled laundry. Approximately 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and positive interactions through courteous behavior and respectful attitude by direct care staff for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Dignity of a total sample of 44 residents, (#252). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #252 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the sacrum or tailbone, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, spinal stenosis, generalized muscle weakness, and history of falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set admission assessment with assessment reference date of 6/30/23 revealed resident #252 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record revealed resident #252 had a care plan for self-care deficit initiated on 6/30/23. Interventions included instructions to staff to anticipate the resident's needs, use a calm approach, and explain actions during care. On 7/10/23 at 5:18 PM, resident #252…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bathroom shared by residents in 1 of 18 bathrooms on the East Wing (room [ROOM NUMBER]) and 2 of 29 rooms on the [NAME] Wing (rooms #154 & #156) were maintained in a clean and homelike condition. Findings: 1. Observations conducted on 07/10/23 at 3:10 PM, 07/11/23 at 12:17 PM, 7/12/23 at 9:29 AM, 12:52 PM, and 5:44 PM and on 07/13/23 at 10:27 AM and 1:24 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom (East Wing) with 7 pink plastic wash basins stacked inside each other on the bathroom floor under a white plastic shower/commode chair. The basins were not labeled with resident names and they were not covered. A pink plastic bedpan (not labeled with resident name or covered) was inside the top wash basin. A yellow plastic fracture bedpan (not labeled with resident name or covered) had been placed in the pink bedpan. On 07/13/23 at 10:27 AM and 1:24 PM, there was a small plastic laboratory specimen collection bag with a biohazard symbol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately record and investigate a grievance to ensure resolution in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for grievances, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#71). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left shoulder osteoarthritis, aortic stenosis, generalized weakness, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment with assessment reference date of 6/23/23 revealed resident #71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment showed the resident was independent with all activities of daily living, except for supervision with dressing, and he was always continent of bowel and bladder. On 7/10/23 at 1:18 PM, resident #71 explained the main concerns that affected his life in the facility was the bad condition of his bathroom. He said, It's never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures for prohibition of Abuse for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Abuse, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#252). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #252 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the sacrum or tailbone, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, spinal stenosis, generalized muscle weakness, and a history of falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set admission assessment with assessment reference date of 6/30/23 revealed resident #252 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 which indicated she was cognitively intact. On 7/11/23 at 1:12 PM, resident #252 expressed concerns regarding a bad experience with staff on her first night in the facility that made her feel afraid. The resident stated in the morning she informed the [NAME] Wing Unit Manager (UM) that she was scared and staff were mean to her. On 7/11/23 at 1:27 PM, the [NAME] Wing UM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for PASARRs of a total sample of 44 residents, (#26). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, recurrent mild depressive disorder, dementia, and traumatic brain injury. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with assessment reference date of 5/22/23 revealed resident #26 was admitted to the facility from another nursing home or swing bed. The MDS assessment indicated the resident was not evaluated by a Level 2 PASARR and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition. PASARR is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care and that they receive necessary services in the most appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that reflected person-centered care related to assistance with toileting for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), of a total sample of 44 residents, (#250). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #250 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including brain cancer, left side paralysis, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] showed resident #250 was oriented to person, place, time, and situation. the document indicated the resident expressed personal care and lifestyle preferences that the facility would honor as able. The assessment showed resident #250 required assistance from staff for toileting and did not have a urinary catheter. On 7/10/23 at 5:35 PM, resident #250 explained he was continent of urine and on admission to the facility, he informed staff he required assistance with placement of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address dental care and services required by 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental services, out of a total sample of 44 residents, (#26). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including arthritis of both knees, type 2 diabetes, legal blindness, and a history of falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with assessment reference date of 5/22/23 revealed resident #26 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 which indicated he was cognitively intact. The document showed the resident had no obvious or likely cavity or broken natural tooth. On 7/11/23 at 11:18 AM, resident #26 pointed to his left lower jaw and stated he had a broken tooth. The brown, jagged surface of an obviously broken and possibly decayed lower left tooth was clearly visible during conversation with the resident. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care related to shaving, bathing, and nail care to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care, out of a total sample of 44 residents, (#26 & #250). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including arthritis of both knees, type 2 diabetes, legal blindness, and a history of falling. Resident #26 had a care plan for self-care deficit with dressing, grooming, and bathing initiated on 5/17/23. The goal was the resident would have a clean, neat appearance. Interventions instructed staff to assist the resident with keeping his nails short, shaped, and clean, and provide hands on assistance with dressing, grooming, and bathing as needed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with assessment reference date of 5/22/23 revealed resident #26 had a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure surgical wound treatments were initiated and provided for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for non-pressure skin out of a total sample of 44 residents, (#298). Findings: Review of resident #298's medical record noted he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) of right lower leg fracture following motor vehicle accident, cardiac and vascular implants and grafts, metabolic encephalopathy, pain, indwelling urinary catheter, and major depressive disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated , 02/02/22 noted he was cognitively intact, having mood issues related to feeling down, depressed, hopeless, tired, and trouble concentrating. He required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, was independent with eating, had impairment with lower extremity and used a walker/wheelchair for mobility. He had an indwelling urinary catheter, no scheduled pain medications, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders and follow professional standards of practice related to oxygen use, monitoring oxygen levels, and replacing respiratory supplies for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#27). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included respiratory failure with low oxygen levels, pneumonitis or inflammation of lung tissue due to inhalation of food or vomit, shortness of breath, and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment with assessment reference date of 6/06/23 revealed resident #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. The document showed the resident required extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene, and was totally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain management, (#92). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including wedge compression fractures of the lumbar and thoracic spine, and muscle spasms. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/14/23 revealed he received pain medication on schedule and as needed. The resident reported occasional pain in the previous five days, and the worst pain intensity was level 6 on a 0 to 10 scale. The document showed he received opioid pain medication on 6 of 7 days in the look back period. Review of the MDS Discharge-Return Anticipated assessment with ARD of 6/24/23 revealed resident #92 continued to receive pain medication on schedule and as needed. The document showed he received opioid pain medication every day during the 7-day look…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to maximize the effectiveness and promote optimal therapeutic effect of medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#248). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #248 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, adult failure to thrive, and pancreatic cancer. The resident also suffered from exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, a deficiency of the pancreatic enzymes that results in the inability to digest food properly (retrieved on 7/18/23 from www.webmd.com/digestive-disorders/exocrine-pancreatic-insufficiency). On 7/10/23 at 4:50 PM, resident #248 explained some of her medications had to be given with meals. She stated her physician emphasized the importance of taking her pills at the right time, particularly those that she needed to take with meals. Resident #248 expressed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent medication errors for 1 of 5 residents reviewed during the Medication Administration task, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#248). There were 2 errors in 25 opportunities for a medication error rate of 5%. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #248 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, adult failure to thrive, and pancreatic cancer. On 7/10/23 between 4:35 PM and 4:45 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) D was observed during medication administration for resident #248. She removed the resident's pills from blister packs stored in the medication cart and administered medication including one tablet Metformin 500 milligrams (mg), one tablet Metoprolol Tartrate 50 mg, and one tablet Nateglinide 60 mg. On 7/10/23 at 4:50 PM, resident #248 explained some of her medications had to be given with meals. She stated her physician emphasized the importance of taking her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a prescribed ointment was appropriately labeled, and failed to maintain medication and supplies securely to prevent unauthorized access in 1 of 1 treatment cart and 1 of 2 medication carts on the [NAME] Wing. Findings: 1. On 7/10/23 at 3:06 PM, an unlocked treatment cart was observed to the left of the [NAME] Wing nurses' station. The treatment cart faced the hallway and all drawers were easily opened. Residents and staff were noted in the hallways and common area in front of the nurses' station. A staff member who worked at a computer in the nurses' station confirmed she was the Wound Nurse. On 7/10/23 at 3:09 PM, the Wound Nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C, stated she unlocked and checked the treatment cart at the start of the 3:00 PM shift. She acknowledged the treatment cart was supposed to be locked to prevent unauthorized access. LPN C looked around the area and stated there were four confused residents in the vicinity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental care, (#26). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including arthritis of both knees, type 2 diabetes, legal blindness, and history of falls. A Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] showed the admission nurse evaluated resident #26's oral status and noted he wore a dental appliance and had no dental problems. A physician order dated 5/15/ 23 indicated the resident could obtain a dental consult as needed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with assessment reference date of 5/22/23 revealed resident #26 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 which indicated he was cognitively intact. The document showed he required extensive assistance from one staff member for personal hygiene such as brushing his teeth, and he did not reject care. The MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was safely stored to prevent foodborne illness for residents residing in the facility. Findings: On 7/10/23 at 10:30 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the upright double door refrigerator contained three plated salads wrapped in plastic with no date and a potato (maybe baked) on a plate wrapped in plastic with no date. [NAME] E stated she made the salads that morning but did not have time to put a date label on them. She did not have a comment about the potato. On a rack in the dry storage area, an opened bag of cornbread mix was wrapped in plastic and had no open/use-by date and the expiration date could not be seen. On 7/13/23 the Certified Dietary Manager stated her expectation was that any food prepared ahead of time or left over needed to be labeled with the date before it was placed in the refrigerator.If dry food was opened, it should be dated before it is put back on the shelf. She noted that all dietary staff had been educated in the past regarding labeling food with the date. Policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and sanitary conditions for food storage in 2 of 2 nutrition rooms (East & [NAME] Wing). Findings: 1. On 11/03/2021 at 1:07 PM, observation of the East Wing nutrition room with the Central Supply Manager revealed three cups of poured juice unlabeled and undated, and an individual container of cottage cheese past the expiration date inside the refrigerator. Food particles and a yellow substance were seen on the inside door of the refrigerator on the door shelves. No temperature log was found for the refrigerator. Food particles and trash were observed on the cabinet shelf, under the basket of snacks when it was lifted by the Central Supply Manager. She stated the kitchen was responsible for maintaining and cleaning the nutrition room. She was unsure who was responsible for the refrigerator temperature logs, but felt it was someone from the kitchen. She said the kitchen staff were supposed to clean the room and check the refrigerator when they came to replenish the nutrition room. The Central…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer oral pain/sleep medication and topical pain relief cream medications for 1 of 50 total sampled residents (#88). Findings: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including-unspecified fracture of upper end of right humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, and muscle weakness. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, with reference date of 10/08/21, revealed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired and a brief interview mental status score of 12/15. On 10/31/2021 at 11:09 AM, the medication Tylenol PM 500 milligrams, a 3 ounce tube of Aspercream, and a 3 ounce jar of Biofreeze was in a pink wash basin on the resident's tray table in her room. Resident #88 stated that the creams are for the pain in her right shoulder. She also stated her son brought the Tylenol PM because He knows I have trouble sleeping. On 11/01/2021 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-03 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #644 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, dysphagia, protein calorie malnutrition, type 2 diabetes, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #644 is rarely/never understood and needed extensive assistance with eating. On 10/31/2021 at 12:15 PM during lunch trays distribution, CNA B took the untouched tray off of resident #644's overbed table. In the resident's room, CNA B said she was taking the tray back to the food cart to stay warm because the resident is a feeder and we do them last. CNA A, who was also in the room, did not try to correct CNA B for calling resident #644 a feeder. On 10/31/2021 at 12:36 PM, resident #644 was in bed with the head of bed raised for lunch and CNA A was standing on the resident's left side of the bed feeding her a mechanical soft diet of fried chicken, mashed potatoes, broccoli and apple pie. CNA A did not talk to the resident and did not sit next to her during the meal.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alhambra Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 1 of 5Lady Lake Specialty Care Center and RehabLady Lake, FL 2 of 5Cypress Care CenterWildwood, FL 2 of 5Lehigh Acres Healthcare & Rehab CenterLehigh Acres, FL 2 of 5North Beach Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterNorth Miami Beach, FL 2 of 5Park Meadows Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterGainesville, FL 2 of 5Sunset Lake Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterVenice, FL 2 of 5Village Place Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterPort Charlotte, FL 2 of 5Villages Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center, TheLady Lake, FL 3 of 5Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 3 of 5Club Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center At The VThe Villages, FL 3 of 5Greenbriar Healthcare Rehabilitation And Nursing CBradenton, FL 3 of 5Grove Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center And RehHernando, FL 3 of 5Lexington Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 3 of 5Shore Acres Care Center And RehabSaint Petersburg, FL 3 of 5South Campus Care Center And RehabLeesburg, FL 3 of 5The Club At Lake GibsonLakeland, FL 3 of 5Viera Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterViera, FL 4 of 5Advanced Care CenterClearwater, FL 4 of 5Lakes Of Clermont Health And Rehabilitation CenterClermont, FL 4 of 5North Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 4 of 5North Lake Care Center And RehabLake Park, FL 4 of 5Ridgecrest Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDeland, FL 4 of 5The Lodge Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterOcala, FL 4 of 5Wilton Manors Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterWilton Manors, FL 5 of 5Carlton Shores Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenteDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL 5 of 5Isle Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterOrange Park, FL 5 of 5Kendall Lakes Healthcare And Rehab CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Plaza Health And RehabGainesville, FL 5 of 5Ponce Therapy Care Center And Rehab, TheSaint Augustine, FL 5 of 5Terrace Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterGainesville, FL 5 of 5Unity Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMiami, FL 5 of 5Villa Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterDeland, FL 5 of 5Woodland Grove Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterJacksonville, FL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ROCKLEDGE SNF HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/23/2022
FL MASTER OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/27/2022
MOBLEY, BILLIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/27/2022
SHELBY, JACKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/27/2022

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 13%Other / private 36%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$338per resident / day
operating cost
$10,285per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$352per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105251. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next