Viera Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 378 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 160 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.82 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 111.8 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by not ensuring staff maintained a secure environment and implemented measures to mitigate the risks to prevent elopement for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for elopement, of a total sample of 10 residents, (#1). These failures contributed to the elopement of resident #1 and placed him at risk for serious injury, impairment, and/or death. While resident #1 was out of the facility unsupervised, there was reasonable likelihood he could have fallen, become lost, accosted by a stranger, or been hit by a vehicle. The facility neglected to identify the need for adequate supervision and ensure a secure environment that contributed to resident #1's elopement and placed all residents at risk for elopement at risk. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy starting on [DATE]. The Immediate Jeopardy was determined to be removed on [DATE] after verification of the immediate actions implemented by the facility. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a secure environment and provide adequate supervision to prevent a severely cognitively impaired resident to exit unauthorized, and unsupervised from the facility and the safety of its property, for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for elopement risk, of a total sample of 10 residents, (#1). These failures contributed to the elopement of resident #1 and placed him at risk for serious injury, impairment, and/or death. While resident #1 was out of the facility unsupervised, there was reasonable likelihood he could have fallen, become lost, accosted by a stranger, or been hit by a vehicle and died. The facility's failure to identify and provide adequate supervision and ensure a secure environment contributed to resident #1's elopement and placed all elopement risk residents at risk. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy starting on 7/20/24. The Immediate Jeopardy was determined to be removed on 7/24/24 after verification of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0559 — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice, including the reason for the change, prior to changing the resident's room for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 42 residents, (#2, #6, and #79).Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #2, a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, muscle spasm, right side lumbago (low back pain) with sciatica (pain along sciatic nerve), and generalized anxiety disorder. The most recent Comprehensive Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/15/26 indicated resident #2 scored 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that indicated she was cognitively intact. The Care Plan Report noted on 1/16/25, resident #2 had alteration in mood/psychosocial well-being related to anxiety with an intervention to provide a calm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and maintained in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent the potential for foodborne illness in the main kitchen and 1 of 2 nourishment rooms. Findings: During the initial tour of the facility kitchen on 2/09/26 at 10:11 AM, the following concerns were observed: *Multiple lids were stored on a rolling storage rack with visible food debris and residue present on the shelving surfaces and rack bars. The rack was soiled, with dried food particles noted on the horizontal supports. *The kitchen ceiling above the dishwashing area revealed multiple ceiling tiles with visible dark spots, stains, and discoloration. *Multiple baking pans contained dried food residue. Photographic evidence was obtained. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) validated the above findings and did not provide an explanation for why the items were in this condition. On 2/10/26 at 9:52 AM, the Regional Dietary Consultant stated the kitchen and baking pans were cleaned the previous night. Observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the refuse storage area in a sanitary condition to prevent the development of odors and the attraction of pests for 2 of 2 dumpsters observed in the exterior kitchen refuse area.Findings: During the initial tour of the facility kitchen on 2/09/26 at 10:31 AM, observation of the exterior refuse area revealed two large waste dumpsters with lids not tightly closed. Plastic trash was protruding from the top of the dumpsters, preventing full lid closure. The surrounding ground surface contained scattered refuse debris, including four plastic gloves. Photographic evidence was obtained. The Certified Dietary Manager and the Maintenance Director acknowledged the findings at the time of the tour. On 2/11/26 at 3:40 PM, the Maintenance Director stated kitchen, housekeeping and maintenance staff disposed of trash in the dumpsters and were responsible for ensuring garbage was contained, debris was not left on the ground, and lids were kept closed, to prevent vermin. He stated he did not know where the discarded gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote resident rights related to the choice of the type of wheelchair used for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 42 residents, (#104).Findings: Review of resident #104's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare, displacement of internal fixation device of vertebrae, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (partial paralysis and weakness) following cerebral infarction affecting her left non-dominant side, and difficulty in walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 1/27/26 revealed resident #104 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment indicated she did not reject evaluation or care needed to achieve her goals for health and well-being. The MDS assessment noted she used a manual wheelchair and was able to independently propel at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt resolution of grievances for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 42 residents, (#94).Findings:Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic obstructive coronary disease, unspecified dementia and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #94 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 out of 15, meaning he was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated he did not have any behaviors nor refused care. On 2/11/26 at 3:05 PM, resident #94 was up in his wheelchair with his wife at the bedside. He stated this was the first time he had been out of bed in a very long time. He explained the reason he had to get up was to attend the care plan meeting. Both the resident and his wife said they had voiced a lot of issues to the facility, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hearing aid assistance was provided for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Communication/Sensory, of a total sample of 42 residents, (#81).Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #81, a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 6/04/23 with diagnoses that included adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, dementia, recurrent major depressive disorder, retinopathy (damage to retina of the eyes), and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the most recent Comprehensive Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/30/25 documented the Preferences for Routine & Activities interview completed with the resident/family member indicated it was very important to resident #81 to listen to music she liked, keep up with the news, do things with groups of people, do favorite activities, and participate in religious services. The most…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented clinical records for medication administration, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for 1 of 7 residents observed for medication administration, of a total sample of 42 residents, (#33).Findings:Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the left lower limb, respiratory failure, peripheral vascular disease and rash. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment with reference date 11/30/25 revealed resident #33's cognition was intact with a brief interview of mental status score of 15 out of 15. Review of resident #33's plan of care showed the resident had the following skin impairments: rash in right lower quadrant of the abdominal folds, scalp seborrheic dermatitis, right dorsal hand wound and stasis dermatitis on bilateral lower legs. Interventions included instruction for nurses to perform wound care treatments as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to promote healing of a sacral pressure ulcer (PU) as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, of a total sample of 10 residents, (#9). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aftercare following joint replacement surgery, type 2 diabetes, heart disease and glaucoma. Review of the admission Summary Progress Notes dated 1/29/25 revealed resident #9 required assistance with activities of daily living including bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, dressing, bathing, and toileting. Review of resident #9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 2/05/25 revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of 15 which indicated moderate cognition impairment. The MDS assessment noted no rejection of care necessary to obtain goals for her health and well-being.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective communication between nursing staff and medical providers and failed to collaborate with a dialysis center to promote adequate treatment, monitoring, and continuity of care for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for dialysis care and services, out of a total sample of 10 residents, (#3 and #4). Findings: Cross Reference F842 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included aneurysm of artery of upper extremity, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and rapidly progressive nephritic syndrome with diffuse crescentic glomerulonephritis. According to the National Library of Medicine, Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) is a clinical syndrome manifested by features of nephritic syndrome and rapid loss of the kidney function over a period of a few weeks to months. (Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4720204/ on 2/21/25). Review of resident #3's physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the administration of medications in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications, out of a total sample of 10 residents, ( #3). Findings: Cross Reference F698 Review of the medical record revealed resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included aneurysm of artery of upper extremity, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and rapidly progressive nephritic syndrome with diffuse crescentic glomerulonephritis. According to the National Library of Medicine, Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) is a clinical syndrome manifested by features of nephritic syndrome and rapid loss of the kidney function over a period of a few weeks to months. (Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4720204/ on 2/21/25). Review of resident #3's physician orders revealed an order dated 2/04/25 for Sevelamer Carbonate 800 milligrams (mg) 3 tables before meals for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,948 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $34,948 — penalty dated 2024-08-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLD FL TRUST II — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL