Good Samaritan - Davenport

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 96.7 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to serve a palatable meal for 2 out of 2 meals observed and four out of four residents reviewed (Resident#14, 3, 43 and 6). The facility reported a census of 98 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident#14, dated 10/18/25, list of diagnoses included heart failure and malnutrition (insufficient intake of calories and/or protein). The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, indicated the resident with intact cognition. The Care Plan for Resident#14 dated 10/28/25, directed educate resident not to skip meals. During an interview on 01/26/2026 at 2:05 PM, Resident #14 reported she did not like the food, and explained it is not hot and the taste is bad. 2. The kitchen staff provided the lunch menu for 1/27/26 which consisted of beef and broccoli, fried rice, peas, and egg roll. On 01/27/2026 at 12:20 PM, the State Agency received a test tray. The beef looked an unattractive dark color, the broccoli appeared pale with little…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interview and facility policy review the facility failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and failed to completed hand hygiene for 2 out of 4 residents reviewed (Resident#2 and #92) and failed to transport clean laundry covered for 2 out of 2 days. The facility reported a census of 98 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #92, dated 11/28/25, list of diagnoses included anemia (lack of red blood cells), Parkinson's disease, and diabetes mellitus (DM). The MDS identified Resident#92 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 12 out of 15, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated Resident#92 required a wheelchair for mobility, dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing and chair to chair transfer. The Care Plan for Resident #92, dated 5/20/25 revealed Resident #92 required EBP related to urine culture that held Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL) (enzymes from bacteria…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with personal care (showers and nail care) to maintain adequate personal hygiene for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #34, Resident #51, and Resident #84) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility reported a census of 98 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 11/16/25 documented diagnoses of depression, diabetes mellitus, and rheumatoid arthritis. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #34 used a walker and a wheelchair for mobility, and required substantial/maximal assistance for bathing.The Care Plan for the resident with an admission date of 4/22/22 indicated the resident was a fall risk, had the potential for pressure ulcer development, and had a self-care performance deficit with limited range of motion and activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, review of facility policy, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from potential hazards for 3 of 7 sampled residents (Residents #6, #11 and #43). The facility reported a census of 98 residents.Findings include:1. Review Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated intact cognitive function. The MDS indicated Resident #43 utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and required substantial/maximum staff assistance with activities of daily living related to toilet transfer and toilet/personal hygiene. The list of diagnoses included diabetes, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of body), cerebral infarct (stroke), seizures and right shoulder pain. Review of Resident #43's Care Plan, last revised 11/26/25, revealed, in part, the resident an ADL self-care performance deficit related to left-sided hemiplegia and required 1:1 (assist of 1 staff) with the commode at shower wall or in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed physician orders to flush a feeding tube before/after an enteral feeding and after the administration of medications for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed with feeding tubes. The facility reported a census of 98.Findings include: Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out 15 which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident (stroke), diabetes, and hemiplegia. The MDS indicated Resident #2 received nutrition both through a gastric feeding tube (g-tube) and a mechanically altered diet. Review of Clinical Physician Orders in the electronic health record (EHR), revealed the following:a. An order, dated 6/18/25, for Isosource 1.5 Cal oral liquid, give 200 milliliters (ml) via g-tube four times per day for meals bolus feeding. Flush with 70 ml before and after each feeding. b. An order, dated 9/24/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to accurate mental health diagnoses are indicated on the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #80 and Resident #84). The facility reported a census of 86 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented Resident #80 diagnoses included: bipolar disorder, stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side) affecting right side, and aphasia (difficulty speaking). The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment not completed. The electronic health record titled Medical Diagnosis, dated 1/15/25 included the diagnosis of manic episode, unspecified with a diagnosis date of 8/2/24. A review of the PASARR dated 5/29/24 lacked diagnosis of manic episode, unspecified and bipolar disorder. During an interview on 1/15/2025 at 9:28 AM. the Social Worker stated she is responsible for reviewing and completing the resident's PASARR. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident, resident family member and staff interviews, the facility failed to respond to activated call lights within in 15 minutes for 4 of 6 (Resident's #3, #4, #6, and #2) residents reviewed for call lights. The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: 1. The 8/29/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool revealed Resident #3 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessed the resident required substantial staff assistance to reposition in bed, transfer to and from bed or chair, for bathing, dressing and use of the toilet. The assessment revealed Resident #3 frequently incontinent of urine. During an interview on 10/17/24 at 10:36 a.m., Resident #3 stated she used the call light several times a day, completely dependent on staff for assistance when she was in bed, it usually took staff 45 minutes to an hour to answer her call light, rarely 30 minutes or less and she had been incontinent as a result of having to wait that long for staff response…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: The 7/24/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool revealed Resident #6 scored 10 out of 15 points possible on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS listed diagnoses included: cerebral palsy, obstructive uropathy (blockage of urine flow), and benign prosthetic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate). The MDS assessed the resident required substantial staff assistance for transfers to and from bed and chair, for dressing, bathing and use of the toilet. The assessment revealed a urinary catheter used for elimination. The Care Plan, initiated on 5/16/19 with revision on 1/31/24, included a Focus area to address The resident has an indwelling catheter R/T (related to) urethral strictures (narrowing), DX (diagnosis) Obstructive Uropathy. Interventions included, in part: a. Catheter care:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, bathing records and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents are provided adequate personal hygiene services to include at least two bathing opportunities per week for 4 of 4 residents reviewed and failed to provide incontinency care at a frequency necessary to maintain adequate personal hygiene for a resident unable to carry out the activity independently. (Residents #1, #3, #4. #5) The facility reported census was 87. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 3/17/24, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating a severely impaired cognitive status. Resident #1 required total dependence to maximal assistance with mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer ' s dementia, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), hemiplegia, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. According to bathing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide an activities program based on a resident's individual interests for 1 of 2 residents reviewed. (Resident #1) The facility reported census was 87. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 3/17/24, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating a severely impaired cognitive status. Resident #1 required total dependence to maximal assistance with mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Diagnosis included Non-Alzheimer ' s dementia, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), hemiplegia, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. According to Resident #1's Plan of Care with focus on maintaining activity interest and interventions which include TV, comedy, non-aggressive shows, jazz,, contemporary, quit or calm music and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 54 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA