Good Samaritan Society - Blackduck

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 27.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-07-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure mechanically altered diets were served as prescribed for 6 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R7) with a physician ordered modified texture diet. This resulted in R1 receiving the incorrect diet, an unaltered piece of pizza, on 6/10/26. R1 required the Heimlich maneuver to dislodge the pizza from her throat. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 6/10/26, at approximately 5:30 p.m., when facility staff served R1 the incorrect diet resulting in R1 needing the Heimlich maneuver performed to dislodge a piece of pizza from her throat. The IJ was identified on 7/1/26, the administrator was notified of the IJ on 7/1/26, at 3:15 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 6/11/26, the deficient practice was corrected prior to the start of the survey and was therefore issued at past noncompliance. Findings include: R1 R1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility 4/24/26. R1's diagnoses included hemiplegia/hemiparesis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded to reflect pressure ulcer staging for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed with pressure ulcers.Findings include:R1's admission Record indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnosis included dehydration, Parkinson's disease, anxiety and weakness. R1's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 10/16/25, indicated a score of 13, which indicated moderate risk.R1's Wound Data Collection dated 10/16/25 at 5:15 p.m., identified an unstageable decubitus (a type of skin injury caused by prolonged pressure on the skin, which restricts blood flow and can lead to tissue damage and death) ulcer on the left buttock that measured 3 centimeters (cm) x .75 cm. Surrounding skin pink and intact. Wound bed 100% granulation tissue (described as being red and moist, with a bumpy or granular appearance due to new capillary buds, fibroblasts, and collagen), which indicated a stage III pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-31 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan related to pressure ulcers was developed for 1 of 3 resident (R1) who admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer and developed pressure ulcers.Findings include:R1's admission Record indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnosis included dehydration, Parkinson's disease, anxiety and weakness. R1's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 10/16/25, indicated a score of 13, which indicated moderate risk.R1's Wound Data Collection dated 10/16/25 at 5:15 p.m., identified an unstageable decubitus (a type of skin injury caused by prolonged pressure on the skin, which restricts blood flow and can lead to tissue damage and death) ulcer on the left buttock that measured 3 centimeters (cm) x .75 cm. Surrounding skin pink and intact. Wound bed 100% granulation tissue (described as being red and moist, with a bumpy or granular appearance due to new capillary buds, fibroblasts, and collagen), which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to perform ongoing and accurate assessment of pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 residents (R1,R3) who were at risk for pressure ulcer development. In addition, the facility failed to implement interventions to reduce the risk for new or worsening pressure ulcers.Findings include:R1's admission Record indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnosis included dehydration, Parkinson's disease, anxiety and weakness. R1's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 10/16/25, indicated a score of 13, which indicated moderate risk.R1's Nursing Admit Re-Admit Data Collection dated 10/16/25 at 4:33 p.m., indicated skilled services to include wound care. Skin integrity assessment indicated a dehisced (partial or total separation of previously approximated wound edges, due to a failure of proper wound healing) scar on the left side of her abdomen, left buttock: crease area unstageable ulcer due to previous location and a scratch on her arm.R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure there was a comprehensive assessment and monitoring for prescribing a psychotropic medication for sleep for 1 of 6 (R26); and failed to provide evidence a gradual dose reduction (GDR) or a clinical justification of a psychotropic medication was completed for 1 of 6 residents (R26, R7) reviewed for unnecessary medication and were taking psychotropic medications. Findings include: R26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R26 had a moderate cognitive impairment and had diagnoses that included dementia. R26 used antidepressant medication daily. R26's Order Summary Report dated 1/28/25, identified Trazodone HCl oral tablet (an antidepressant primarily used to treat major depressive disorder. It works by increasing serotonin levels in the brain, which can help improve mood, appetite, and energy levels, as well as reduce anxiety and insomnia related to depression. Additionally, trazodone is sometimes prescribed as a sleep aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with repositioning for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings include:R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified R2 had moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included dementia, renal insufficiency and anemia. R2 was at risk of pressure injury/ulcer and required substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfers.R2's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 5/28/25, identified R2 was at high risk for pressure injury/ulcer.R2's care plan revised 5/29/24, included interventions to check and reposition R2 frequently during the day, 12:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m. at night; turn from Side to Side: R2 required substantial/max assist of 1 staff member for turning side to side in bed with use of bilateral grab bars on bed.- During a continuous observation on 8/20/25 at 7:18 a.m., R2 was lying in bed. R2's head of bed (HOB) was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to assess and analyze a resident fall with major injury to identify specific hazards and/or risks and to develop targeted interventions to reduce the potential for falls for 1 of 1 resident (R27) reviewed for falls.Findings include:R27's resident event form dated 8/8/25 at 4:45 p.m., identified on 8/8/25 R27 was observed peddling himself with his feet in the hallway, became tangled up in a computer table and fell out of his wheelchair. The wheelchair then fell on top of the resident. No immediate intervention put into place and unknown if there was an injury. R27's progress notes dated 8/11/25 at 4:50 p.m., identified R27 had a fall on 8/8/25 with a hip fracture and was currently in the hospital after hip nailing. Anti-roll backs would be applied to resident's wheelchair. However, the note failed to identify a description or cause of R27's fall.R27's falls tool report dated 8/15/25, identified R27 was at risk for falls related to an actual fall on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for indwelling urinary catheter; and failed to ensure urinary catheter care was provided in a manner to prevent contamination and potential urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for urinary catheter. Findings include:R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4 had a severe cognitive impairment and had diagnoses that included hematuria, neuromuscular bladder dysfunction (nerve damage that affects bladder control), reflux uropathy (the backward flow of urine from your bladder into your kidneys. Without treatment, the condition could lead to complications such as high blood pressure and chronic kidney disease.), type 2 diabetes, dementia and a methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). R4 used an indwelling urinary catheter.R4's care plan revised 4/18/25, identified R4 had an indwelling catheter due to urinary retention and obstruction. Staff were instructed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the consulting pharmacist recommendations were addressed and acted upon and documented in the medical record for 2 of 5 residents (R26, R7) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include: R26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R26 had a moderate cognitive impairment and had diagnoses that included dementia. R26 used antidepressant medication daily. R26's Order Summary Report dated 8/21/25, identified Trazodone HCl oral tablet (an antidepressant primarily used to treat major depressive disorder. It works by increasing serotonin levels in the brain, which can help improve mood, appetite, and energy levels, as well as reduce anxiety and insomnia related to depression. Additionally, trazodone is sometimes prescribed as a sleep aide due to its sedative effects, and it is considered non-addictive.) give 25 milligrams (mg) at bedtime related to unspecified dementia, moderate, with other behavioral disturbance was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary conditions in the dry storage of the kitchen. This practice had the potential to affect all 29 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During the initial tour on 6/11/24 at 10:53 a.m., the dry storage was toured. There was dented can of tomato juice on the shelf for use. There were two large covered plastic bins. The first contained an opened 50 pound (lb) bag of cake mix with a bunched up, gaping top. The bin cover remained open to air. The second bin's cover was lying on a rack shelf and there were two 50 lb opened bags in the bin. The tops of the bags were bunched up and gaping open. The opened bag of biscuit mix had no date to determine when the bag had been opened and the opened bag of sweet cornbread mix was dated as opened 2/15/24. [NAME] (C)-A stated that was how they always were. C-A had no idea how long they were good for, how often they were used and/or if the cover should be on. C-A did not know who was responsible for the dry storage area and the kitchen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to conduct ongoing quality assessment (QA) and assurance activities and develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct quality deficiencies identified during the survey that the facility was aware of or should have been aware of that had the potential to adversely affect all 29 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: See also 880: the facility failed to perform timely tracking and trending of potential infectious symptoms to prevent the spread of transmissable organisms. Additionally, the facility failed to implement timely transmission-based precautions (TBP) and testing for COVID-19 according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for 4 of 4 residents (R4, R23, R22, R15) who were displaying COVID-19 symptoms; and failed to implement timely TBP for 2 of 2 residents (R12, R14) who were confirmed to have human metapneumovirus (HMPV) (a respiratory illness). This had the potential to affect all 29 residents, visitors and staff. See also 882: the facility infection preventionist (IP) failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,205 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $22,205 — penalty dated 2026-07-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 57 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $700K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN