Good Samaritan Society New Underwood

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 37.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.06 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the safety of one of one sampled resident (1) who fell as she walked to her room with the assistance of one of one certified nursing assistant (CNA) who had not used a safety device (gait belt) while assisting the resident. That fall resulted in resident 1's development of a hematoma (collection of blood outside blood vessels) to the back of her head and a fractured left femur (thigh bone). CNA C's failure to use a gait belt may have contributed to the accident. Findings include: 1. Review of the provider's 3/28/25 SD DOH FRI regarding resident 1 revealed: *On 3/28/25, CNA C was walking with resident 1 to her room after lunch when resident 1 lost her balance and fell backwards. *CNA C was not using a gait belt (a waist strap gripped as support for safe mobility and transfers) while walking with resident 1, and was not able to intervene when resident 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to prevent one of one sampled resident (23) from developing a facility-acquired pressure ulcer and to assess and document that facility-acquired pressure ulcer accurately. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 1/28/25 at 9:20 a.m. with resident 23 revealed: *She was in bed lying on her back. -She stated, I have a blister on my butt, so they wanted me to lay here a little longer to help it heal, but I hate it. -Resident 23 agreed to the observation of her wound care and stated that her dressing changes were usually done in the morning. 2. Observation and interview on 1/28/25 at 3:43 p.m. with resident 23 revealed: *She was sitting up in her chair. -She stated that the staff uses a sling to move her from her bed to her chair and she eats all of her meals sitting in her chair in her room. 3. Observation of wound care on 1/29/25 at 10:03 a.m. revealed a pressure ulcer on resident 23's left buttock that had already been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to follow food safety standards related to food storage practices of packaged food in the kitchen, dry food storage area, food service station area, and walk-in refrigerator.Findings include:1. Observations on 12/1/25 between 11:00 a.m. and noon and again at 4:40 p.m. revealed: *In the kitchen above a service window, there was a clear, plastic tub. The label affixed to the tub identified the contents in that tub as Food Thickener. There was no date marking on that label to support when it was opened and put in that tub. A hand scoop was inside that tub. -Next to that tub was a clear glass dispenser with a piece of masking tape on it that read thickner. There was no date marking on that dispenser. *Inside the dry food storage room, there were: -Seven boxes of unopened rice with no date markings on them. -One 16-oz opened bag of unopened Instant Mashed Potato flakes with a best by date of 2/10/25. -Twelve bags of unopened gravy mix with no date markings on them. -One undated bulk-sized, opened bag of Cherrios.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, review of Resident Council minutes, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that grievances regarding long call light response wait times reported at resident council meetings were addressed and documentation reflected:*The staff's efforts to resolve those grievances.*Efforts to resolve those grievances were approved as effective resolutions by the resident council.Findings include:1. Interview on 12/2/25 at 10:45 a.m. and again on 12/8/25 at 12:15 p.m. with resident 15 revealed she was an active resident council participant. The group had monthly meetings. The council's concern since May 2025 was long call light response times, especially during the late afternoon and early evening hours. That response time ranged between 30 minutes to one hour. Resident 15 was able to move within the facility independently, use her call light, and verbally advocate for herself. She felt the call light response times did not impact her as much as other residents, like her roommate. Her roommate had significant physical and verbal impairments. Sometimes, resident 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that nursing professional standards were followed by: *One of one observed registered nurse (RN) (F) who did not following the physician's order for one of one sampled resident (3) during a skin wound treatment.*One of one RN (H) who did not document if three doses of an antibiotic were administered to one of one sampled resident (3) as ordered.Findings include:1. Interview on 12/1/25 at 1:30 p.m. with resident 3 revealed she was hospitalized in September 2025 because her suprapubic catheter (flexible tubing surgically placed through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine) was not working properly. She required intravenous (IV) antibiotics after she was discharged from the hospital and returned to the facility. 2. Review of resident 3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that on 9/25/25, she was transferred to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation of a non-functioning catheter. She was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff followed standard infection control practices for:*Not having placed two of two sampled residents (4 and 20) on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (glove and gown use when providing contact care).*Posting clear signage indicating the type of precaution for three of three sampled residents (5, 12, and 19). *Appropriate hand hygiene (HH) (handwashing with soap and water or use of a hand sanitizer) and glove use by three of three staff members (registered nurse RN (F), certified nursing assistant CNA (G), and clinical care leader CCL (C) during treatment, care, and transition in care for three of four sampled residents (1,3, and 20). *Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) (gown and glove) application and removal by one of one CCL (C) and removal by one of one CNA (G). *Not having placed barriers by two of two staff RN (F) and CCL (C) during medication administration and treatments of two of two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff protected the resident's right to personal privacy for:*One of one sampled resident (1) during administration of her medications through an alternative method by one of one registered nurse (RN) (F).*One of one sampled resident (3) during her skin treatment by one of one RN (F).Findings include:1. Observations on 12/1/25 at 2:20 p.m. of registered nurse (RN) F in resident 1's room revealed that resident 1 was seated in her wheelchair facing the television. A window on the left side of the resident faced a parking lot and a road. The door to her semi-private room was open to the hallway on her right side. Resident 1's roommate was lying in bed and could see resident 1. Without closing the room door, drawing the privacy curtain between resident 1 and her roommate, or closing the window curtain, RN F lifted the front of resident 1's shirt, exposed the resident's abdomen to reach her feeding tube (a tube surgically placed in the abdomen for administration of liquid nutritional formula). After RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to:*Report an incident to the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) for one of one sampled resident (5) who left the facility without staff knowledge (eloped) on 11/24/25.Findings include:Refer to citation writing at F689.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the care plans were reviewed and revised to reflect the current care needs for four of six sampled residents (5, 12, 19, and 20).Findings include:1. Observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 2:11 p.m. in the north hall with resident 20 in her room revealed:*Resident 20 was in her room, sitting in her wheelchair with her feet resting on the wheelchair foot pedals.*Resident 20 stated she was unable to walk due to a broken left leg and that she had open sores on her heels.*There was a pair of black and gray soft padded boots on top of her bed.-She stated she was supposed to wear them throughout the day, but she didn't like them.*There was no precaution sign posted outside or inside the door of her room related to the open sores on her heels.*There was no personal protective equipment (PPE), such as gloves and gowns, available for use inside resident 20's room or near her door. 2. Review of resident 20's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She had a pressure sore (injury to skin and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to:*Identify and implement interventions to help prevent elopement for one of one sampled resident (5) who eloped (left the facility without staff knowledge) when he pressed the exit bar on the door long enough to release it. Findings include:1. Review of a nurse progress note dated 11/24/25 at 3:30 p.m. titled 'Safety Event-Incident Report' regarding resident 5 revealed:*Resident 5 left the facility through the southwest door. *He propelled his wheelchair out onto the sidewalk and into the gazebo.*An unidentified dietary staff member arriving at work saw resident 5 outside and helped him back into the building through the southwest door.*He was evaluated after the event, and his condition remained unchanged.*Resident 5 complained that it was cold. Resident 5 refused education when the nurse tried to discuss the risks of leaving the facility unattended.*A 72-hour safety check and charting were started for every shift.*The physician was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the provider failed to ensure the posted daily staff information included the total number and the actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, licensed vocational nurses, and certified nursing assistants per shift.Findings include:1. Observation on 12/2/25 at 9:30 a.m. of the posted nurse staffing information revealed: *It was posted near the front entrance door and on a wall near the nurses' station.*There were three sections for each shift and four categories of staff listed in each section: RN (registered nurse), LPN (licensed practical nurse), LVN (licensed vocational nurse), and CNA (certified nurse aide). *The nurse category sections listed the number of nursing staff scheduled for each shift.*There were no documented actual hours or total number of nurse staffing hours worked on the form. 2. Interview on 12/4/25 at 2:33 p.m. with director of nursing (DON) B revealed:*She was unsure of all the required details for the posted nurse staffing data, such as the total number and actual hours worked per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure an effective, comprehensive quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program was implemented to track and measure performance; systematically analyze underlying causes of a systemic quality deficiency; develop and implement corrective actions or performance improvement activities; and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective actions, and to revise those actions as needed.Findings include:1. Interview on 12/2/25 at 10:45 a.m. and on 12/8/25 at 12:15 p.m. with resident 15 revealed she was an active resident council participant. Social Services Supervisor (SSS) D facilitated those monthly council meetings. Since May 2025, the council had been concerned about long call light response times, especially during the late afternoon and early evening hours. That response time ranged between 30 minutes to one hour. 2. Review of the provider's June 2025 through November 2025 resident council minutes confirmed that during each of those monthly meetings, the council had identified a concern…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$26,595 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-06-10
• $15,405 — penalty dated 2025-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $607K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SD