Good Samaritan Society - Atkinson
409 Neely Street, Atkinson, NE 68713 · Non profit - Corporation · 61 certified beds · (402) 925-2875 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $22,653 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-10)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 37.0% | 19.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.9% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 2.8% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 4.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.2% | 18.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.3% | 19.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 4.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 35.7% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.3% | 20.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 0.0% | 20.7% | 22.6% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.3% | 11.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.54 | 1.81 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.16 | 1.92 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
35.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 35.1%CMS range 22.4–51.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.5–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 84.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 3.9–15.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 28.2 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to notify Resident 22's physician, Resident 29's responsible party and physician, and Resident 2's responsible party of a change in condition. The sample size was 3 residents. The facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Change in Condition Evaluation (CICE), last revised/reviewed 3/29/23 revealed the following: -the purpose of the CICE was to improve communication between nurses and a provider when nursing is monitoring a change in condition, enhance the nursing evaluation and documentation of a resident who had a change in condition, and provide a standard format to collect pertinent clinical data prior to contacting the provider, -nursing judgement was to be used when determining the urgency of contacting the provider, -nursing staff checked with other staff members who had regular contact with the resident to obtain an accurate picture of the change in condition, -nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D8b Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to identify and implement measures to prevent a significant weight loss and notify the provider for 1 (Resident 29) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 33. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Nutrition Risk Committee- Food and Nutrition Services last revised 3/24/23 revealed the following: -the purpose was to provide a process for monitoring and evaluating resident who had impaired nutrition or were at risk for nutrition-related problems, -the nutrition risk committee used documentation of weights, food and fluid intakes, meal observation and other pertinent data to identify residents at risk, -the Director of Food and Nutrition (DFN), dietician or designee were to provide the list of residents to be discussed during the committee meeting, -the nutrition risk committee was to meet as often as necessary, but at least monthly, -the nutrition risk committee consisted of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(D)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all facility residents who utilized a call device. This had the potential to effect all residents in the building. The facility census was 28.Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Call Light, last revised 7/8/25 revealed the following:-the purpose was to ensure resident had a method of calling for assistance and to promptly answer the resident's call lights;-when resident's call lights were observed, staff were to go to the resident's room promptly, -staff were to respond to the request as soon as possible, turn the call light off and inquire about the resident's request;-when leaving a room, staff were to place call lights within easy reach of the resident;-for resident's unable to use a call light, appropriate interventions would be care planned; and-each facility was responsible for having an alternate method of communication during a loss of power or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(D)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure 8 hours of consecutive Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in a 24-hour period 7 days per week as required. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 28.Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Nursing Services, last revised 10/14/25 revealed the purpose was to provide appropriate staff for resident care and revealed the following:-the facility must have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment;-the facility must provide services by sufficient numbers of each of the following types of personnel on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(I)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to implement their Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan to maintain a system to prevent repeat deficient practices including accidents, weight loss, sufficient staffing, unnecessary medications and Emergency Preparedness. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 28. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated 5/20/25 revealed the facility implemented and maintained an ongoing comprehensive data driven program to address the unique needs of those served and a full range of care and services provided.-The program was ongoing and addressed the complexity and uniqueness of the care and services provided. -The quality program measured, analyzed, and tracked quality indicators, adverse events, and other aspects of performance that enabled assessment of care, services and operations. -The Governing body provided oversight through plan implementation and evaluation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination as the staff failed to utilize the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-items such as gowns, gloves, masks, goggles, face shields, and foot coverings) when performing personal/catheter cares for Resident 7 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-use of PPE to reduce the transmission of multi drug-resistant organisms (MDRO- organisms resistant to at least one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) between residents) and to ensure ongoing surveillance of infections. The total sample size was 20 and the facility census was 28. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Standard, Enhanced Barrier, and Transmission-Based Precautions with a revised date of 7/7/25 revealed the following: -standard precautions were a group of infection prevention practices that applied to all residents in any setting in which healthcare was delivered, to prevent the spread of infection. -standard precautions included hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-10 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(D)(E)Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to obtain informed consent for the use of psychotropic medications and/or information for alternate treatment options for Residents 3, 6, 24, and 30. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 28. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medications with a revision date of 12/9/25 revealed the following: -The purpose was to evaluate behavior interventions and alternatives before using psychotropic medications and to eliminate unnecessary medications. - A consent form must be signed for the use of psychotropic medications. - If a resident was admitted on psychotropic medications or returned from the hospital on new psychotropic medications, the reduction committee was informed, the family/legal representative and resident were notified, Permission for Use of Psychotropic Medications form was to be completed, and the family/representative and/or resident were informed of the risks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(S) Based on observations, record review, and interviews; the failed to ensure Resident 7 was treated with respect and dignity during the provision of personal cares. The sample size was 1 and the facility census was 28.Findings are: A. Review of the Resident's Rights for Skilled Nursing Facilities (undated) policy revealed the facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. B. During an observation of personal/catheter care for Resident 7 on 2/9/26 from 11:19 AM to 11:42 AM, the following was identified:-the resident was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. The resident's bed was positioned directly next to a large picture window and the curtains had been left open. No shades or blinds were in place to the window. In addition, there was no privacy curtain in the semiprivate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure Resident's 6's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications due to failure to monitor for potential side effects of a psychotropic medication. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 28.Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medications with a reviewed/revised date of 12/9/25 revealed the purpose of the policy was to evaluate behavior interventions and alternatives before using psychotropic medications and to eliminate the use of unnecessary medications. Each resident had the right to be free from any chemical restraint imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical signs and symptoms. Each resident's drug regimen was to be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used:-in excessive dose including duplicative drug therapy.-for excessive duration.-without adequate monitoring.If the Primary Care Provider (PCP) prescribed an antipsychotic for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)Based on record review and interview: the facility failed to report an allegation of potential staff to resident abuse and to send the results of an investigation to the State Agency within the required timeframes for Resident 7. The sample size was 2 and the facility census was 28. Findings are:A. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect policy with a revision date of 4/7/25 revealed the purpose of the policy was to:-ensure the staff were knowledgeable regarding the reporting and investigative process of abuse and neglect allegations. -ensure the location had an effective system in place that, regardless of the source, prevented mistreatment, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of their property. -ensure residents were not subjected to abuse by anyone including but not limited to employees, other residents, consultants, volunteers, employees of other agencies, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals. -ensure all identified events of alleged or suspected abuse/neglect including injuries of unknown origin were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(A)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of facility discharges for Residents 1 and 34. The sample size was 2 and the facility census was 28. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Discharge and Transfer dated 1/15/26 revealed the facility ensured discharges and/or transfers were documented in the medical record and appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care provider. The facility allowed each resident to remain in the facility unless discharge or transfer was necessary for the resident's welfare and/or the resident's needs could not be met, and the discharge was appropriate. The facility provided sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safety and orderly transfer or discharge. With a transfer or discharge the facility sent a copy of an approved discharge form to the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. B. Review of Resident 1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to address Resident 28's nutritional status and risk for weight loss on the resident's comprehensive plan of care and failed to involve Resident 12's legal guardian in the development of the resident's care plan. The total sample size was 20 and the facility census was 28. Findings are: A. Review of the Care Plan Policy with a revised/reviewed date of 12/1/25 revealed the purpose of the policy was to develop a comprehensive care plan using an interdisciplinary approach. A comprehensive care plan was to include measurable objectives, and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Each resident was to have an individualized person-centered, comprehensive plan of care that included measurable goals and timetables directed toward achieving and maintaining the resident's optimal medical, nursing, physical, functional,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(l)(i)(3) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to revise current fall interventions and/or develop new interventions to prevent ongoing falls for Resident 6. The sample size was 6 and the facility census was 28.Findings are: A. Review of the Fall Prevention and Management policy with revised/reviewed date of 10/14/25 revealed the purpose of the policy was to promote resident well- being by developing and implementing a fall prevention and management program, identifying risk factors, and implementing interventions before a fall occurs. If a resident fall occurs, the following procedure was identified:-assess the resident and perform a full body examination.-notify the Primary Care Physician (PCP) and the resident's representative.-complete a Fall Scene Huddle Worksheet to determine causal factors and fall interventions.-document the incident in the Safe Event-Incident Report. B. Review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 11/26/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(i)(1)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions to address a weight loss for 1 (Resident 28) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 28.Findings are:A. Review of the Weight and Height Policy with a reviewed/revised date of 9/30/25 revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure residents maintained an acceptable parameter of nutritional status, accurately measure weights and monitored weight loss or gain in residents. The facility was to inform the resident, the resident's representative, the Primary Care Physician (PCP), and the Registered Dietician (RD) when there was a significant change in the resident's weight. The policy further indicated if a weight varied by more than 3 percent (%) staff were to reweigh the resident. B. Review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS, federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to develop resident care plans) dated 10/22/25 revealed diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on record reviews and interviews; the facility failed to notify Resident 1's practitioner of the residents increased lethargy, decreased appetite, lowered blood glucose levels and staff failure to administer insulin; and Resident 3 and 4's practitioner and/or responsible parties of ongoing falls. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 33. A. Review of the facility policy Notification of Change with a revision date of 12/23/2024 revealed the purpose of the policy was to identify when regulation required notifications to occur. The policy further revealed the facility must immediately inform the resident, the resident's physician and the resident representative when there was:-an accident involving the resident which resulted in an injury and had the potential for requiring physician intervention.-a significant change occurred in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status.-there was a need to alter treatment significantly, a need to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin and to submit an investigation to the State Agency within 5 working days for 1 (Resident 3) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: A. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect Policy with a reviewed/revised date of 4/7/25 revealed the policy of the facility was to ensure all alleged or suspected violations involving any mistreatment. neglect, exploitation or abuse, including injuries of unknown origin were to be reported immediately to the Administrator or a delegated individual. The purpose of the policy was to: -ensure employees were knowledgeable regarding reporting and investigating the process of abuse and neglect allegations in the facility. -ensure the facility had an effective system in place that, regardless of the source, prevented mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of their property. -ensure residents were not subjected to abuse by anyone including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of potential abuse for Residents 1 and 2 and to report an allegation of potential abuse for Resident 2 within the required timeframe. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 31. Findings are: A. Review of the facility Abuse and Neglect Policy with a reviewed/revised date of 4/7/25 revealed the policy of the facility was to ensure all alleged or suspected violations involving any mistreatment. neglect, exploitation or abuse, including injuries of unknown origin were to be reported immediately to the Administrator or a delegated individual. The purpose of the policy was to: -ensure employees were knowledgeable regarding reporting and investigating the process of abuse and neglect allegations in the facility. -ensure the facility had an effective system in place that, regardless of the source, prevented mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of their property. -ensure residents were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C. Review of Resident 16's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, had Diabetes, had a dementia diagnosis, and received substantial assistance with bathing. Review of Resident 16's Care Plan with a revision date of 12/27/24 revealed the resident had impaired cognitive function and confusion, self-care deficits and requested one bath weekly and needed staff assistance to bathe. Review of Resident 16's Bathing Records from December 1st, 2024, through January 15th, 2025, revealed the following: -Bathing occurred on the following days in December 2024: December 4th, 11th, and 18th. -Bathing occurred on the following days in January 2025: No documented baths as of January 2025. -There was no evidence of bathing from December 18th, 2024, and January 15th, 2025 (28 days). During an interview on 1/15/25 at 10:15 AM RN-G confirmed Resident 16 was not receiving baths at least weekly as care planned. D. Review of Resident 3's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to meet the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs for Resident 20 and the bathing needs for Resident's 3, 11, 16 and 24. The sample size was 20 with a census of 31. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment use to develop resident care plans) dated 12/12/24 revealed the resident received substantial to maximal assistance with toileting cares and transfers and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident had a diagnosis of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's Dementia with short- and long-term memory loss with severely impaired decision-making skills. Review of Resident 20's Care Plan with a revision date of 11/27/24 revealed the resident required extensive assist to use the toilet, was dependent on staff for perineal hygiene and required extensive assist with transfers. The resident did not recognize the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to develop new interventions and/or revise current interventions to prevent ongoing falls for Residents 182 and 26. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 31. Findings are: A. Review of the Fall Prevention and Management Policy with a revision date of 7/29/24 revealed the purpose of the policy was to promote the resident's well-being by developing and implementing an individualized fall prevention and management program. Staff were to identify risk factors and implement interventions before a fall occurred. The following procedure was identified: -observe the fall scene. -determine if there may be a suspected injury. -if the fall was not witnessed then staff are to complete neurological checks per policy. -review the resident's current interventions to determine if a revision is needed or new interventions developed. -if any teaching is done as an intervention, then to document in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to revise nutritional interventions and/or develop new interventions to address ongoing weight loss for 1 (Resident 14) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 31. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Weight and Height with a revision date of 10/15/2024 revealed the following regarding weighing the residents and monitoring weight loss. The policy indicated the purpose of weighing the resident was to: -ensure the resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status regarding weight. -report a significant weight change to the physician, family, and resident. -monitor weight loss in a resident. The policy indicated residents at nutritional risk were to be weighed weekly and the facility was to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify the resident's legal representative when there was a significant change in the residents' weight. The following procedure was identified for weighing the resident: -weigh the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(A) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a documented rationale for the use of an anti-depressant for Resident 4. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 31. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medications with a revision date of 12/30/24 revealed the following: -the resident would be free from any chemical restraint imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, -each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used in excessive dose or duration, without adequate monitoring or without adequate indications for use, in the presence of adverse consequences that indicated the dose should be reduced or discontinued, or any of the above combination of the reasons above, -after reviewing the mood and behavior documentation, the behavior committee and/or care plan team determines psychotropic medications may be necessary, the reduction team would be notified, -Gradual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement hand hygiene at appropriate intervals and utilize Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a manner to prevent the potential spread of infection for Resident 15. The sample size was 16 and the facility census was 31. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions, last revised 4/2/24 revealed: -Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) expand the use of PPE beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated ad refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDRO's to staff hands and clothing, -EBP is needed for resident with chronic wounds, and residents with indwelling medical devices (catheters, indwelling urinary catheters), -EBP are intended for the duration of the resident's stay, -EBP's are also needed for residents with CDC-targeted and MDRO infections and colonization's, -High-Contact Care Activities included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(A) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to offer Resident 16 the recommended Pneumococcal vaccines in accordance with facility policy and Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 31. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Immunization/Vaccinations for Residents, Pneumococcal, Influenza, COVID-19, Other with a revision date of 9/21/23 revealed the facility provided residents the opportunity to receive immunizations as they fit into their healthcare goals. -Upon admission, each resident and/or their representative received Vaccination Information Statements for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. -The facility reviewed immunization records for all residents each year and residents' vaccine eligibility was reviewed on an ongoing basis as immunization recommendations changed. -Each time eligibility was determined education, consent, and screening were provided prior to each vaccine given. -All Residents received pneumococcal vaccination per CDC guidelines. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04 Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to have staff adequate to meet the bathing needs of residents, respond in a timely fashion to call lights and to meet the housekeeping needs of residents. The sample size was 6 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility bathing records from 8/1/24 through 9/24/24 for Residents 1,2,4, and 5 revealed the following: -Resident 4 was bathed on 9/15/25 (1 bath in 55 days) -Resident 2 was bathed on 8/5/24, 8/19/24, 9/2/24 and 9/16/24 (4 bathes in 55 days). -Resident 1 was bathed on 8/5/24, 8/8/24, 8/29/24, 9/2/24, 9/12/24, and 9/20/24 (6 baths in 55 days). -Resident 5 was bathed on 8/1/24, 8/7/24, 8/8/24, 8/20/24, 8/29/24, 9/3/24, 9/7/24, and 9/15/24 (8 baths in 55 days and resident desired 2 baths weekly per the resident's care plan). B. Review of the facility Staff Posting dated 9/25/24 revealed the facility had 2 Registered Nurses, 2 Nurse Aides, and 1 Bath Aide scheduled from 6:00 AM until 2:30 PM. During an interview on 9/25/24 at 1:30 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the resident's rooms and bathrooms and to maintain a safe and odor free environment. This affected 12 (rooms 98, 99, 103, 104, 105, 106, 205, 300, 301, 305, 306 and 309) out of 33 resident rooms. The facility census was 33. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Housekeeping Resource Packet with a revision date of 8/30/24 revealed the following regarding cleaning of resident rooms and common areas: -clean surfaces as often as necessary to keep furniture and equipment free from dust, dirt, debris, or food particles. -develop a daily schedule for cleaning floors that includes more thorough cleaning on a routine basis. -damp wipe with neutral cleaner or mild disinfectant high touch areas such as handrails, and/or door handles on a frequent basis. -empty waste baskets daily or as needed and then clean and disinfect the inside of the containers as needed to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) (i)(1) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for 4 (Residents 1, 2, 4, and 5) of 6 sampled residents who were dependent with bathing. The facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Bathing with a revision date of 9/3/24 revealed the facility promoted cleanliness and general hygiene to stimulate skin circulation, promote comfort, relaxation, and well-being, to observe the resident's condition, to assist the resident with personal care, and to promote safety for the resident in the bath. B. Review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 9/4/24 revealed diagnoses of cerebral palsy, depression, and schizophrenia. The assessment further indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, functional limitation of range of motion to both sides of the resident's upper and lower extremities and was dependent for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(4) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 3) of 6 sampled residents call light was accessible. The facility census was 33. A. Review of the facility policy Call Light with a revision date of 7/29/24 revealed the facility ensured residents always had a method for calling for assistance and prompt answering of call lights. Review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to develop resident care plans) dated 9/16/24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was dependent for dressing, all hygiene, bathing, and transfers. The resident's urinary continence was not rated due to the presence of a catheter. Review of Resident 3's Care Plan with a revision date of 9/17/24 revealed the resident received Hospice services for a terminal diagnosis, was dependent for toileting and had an indwelling urinary catheter in place. During an observation on 9/25/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure the resident's family or responsible party were notified of orders, appointments, and/or procedures for 1 (Resident 1) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 33. Findings are: Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool used in care planning) dated 8/1/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact; had diagnoses of diabetes, heart failure, anxiety, depression, and respiratory failure; and needed assistance with toileting, dressing, hygiene, bathing, and transfers. Review of Resident 1's Care Plan, last revised 7/31/24 revealed the resident required assistance with toileting, dressing, hygiene, bathing, and transfers. Review of Resident 1's Progress Notes revealed the following: -on 8/8/24 at 10:44 AM an entry revealed a fax was received with a new order to decrease the gabapentin (a medication used to treat nerve pain) to 300 milligrams (mg) 4 times per day. The facility was unable to reach the responsible party, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(1) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure potential infection/complication with Resident 3's urinary catheter (tube used to drain urine from the bladder and collected in a sterile closed system drainage bag). The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Catheter: Care, Insertion and Removal, Drainage Bags, Irrigation, Specimen dated 7/30/24 revealed the following: -Catheter tubing and drainage bags were kept covered and out of sight, catheters were always properly secured, connected and maintained using a sterile closed drainage system. -Catheter tubing was secured to the resident's leg, coiled on the bed with no kinks or obstructions and kept in straight line to the urinary drainage bag. In addition, the tubing should never be allowed to touch the floor. Review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to develop resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to implement an ongoing system for tracking antibiotic use to identify trends in infections for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 33. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program, last revised 10/30/23 revealed the following: -the infection prevention and control program prevented, identified, reported, investigated, and controlled infections for all resident's, staff, and visitors, -the components of the infection prevention and control program included: program oversight, policies and procedures, surveillance, data analysis, antibiotic stewardship, outbreak management, prevention of infections, immunizations, and employee heath and safety, -the facility would establish a system for surveillance based on standards of practice, -the facilities surveillance system included a data collection tool and the use of a nationally recognized surveillance criteria to define infections, -resident infection surveillance would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY D. Review of a facility investigation report dated 12/4/23 related to a fall incident for Resident 5 revealed the following: -12/3/23 at 5:45 AM, staff were assisting the resident to the bathroom. The resident stood from the toilet to transfer into the wheelchair, the resident's knee buckled, and staff then lowered the resident to the floor. -12/3/23 at 7:30 AM the resident complained of left knee pain and had increased swelling to the knee. -12/3/23 at 1:30 PM the resident continued to complaint of left lower leg pain and was unable to bear weight on the leg. -12/4/23 at 10:00 AM the resident's knee was swollen, and the resident was unable to bend the left knee. The physician was notified, and the resident was sent for an x-ray. The resident was admitted to the hospital with a fracture of the femur, fibula and the fifth toe of the left leg/foot. -the incident was reported to APS on 12/4/23 at 11:51 AM. There was no evidence the facility submitted a written investigation related to the fall with injury and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated assessed used to develop resident care plans) to reflect the resident's status at the time of the assessment regarding nutritional approaches for Residents 10, 2, 84, and 16 and medication use for Resident 17. The sample size was 17 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 10's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following: -diagnoses of: anemia, high blood pressure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, anxiety, and respiratory failure. -received 25% or less of total calories through parental or tube feeding. -received 500 cubic centimeters (cc) or less of average fluid intake by Intravenous (IV) or tube feeding. -did not receive parental or IV feeding. B. Review of Resident 2's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following: -diagnoses of: non-traumatic brain dysfunction, schizoaffective disorder, atrial fibrillation, high blood pressure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to: 1) obtain orders for management of a blood glucose monitoring device and to ensure assessments and ongoing monitoring were completed for wound care and blood glucose levels for Resident 184; 2) reposition Resident 16 in accordance with the plan of care to prevent the potential for skin breakdown; and 3) follow physician orders regarding fluid restriction and weight monitoring for Resident 5. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment tool used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 10/15/23 revealed diagnoses of anemia, coronary artery disease, end stage renal disease, diabetes, heart failure and anxiety. The resident was assessed as cognitively intact, the resident's weight was 223 pounds, and the resident was identified as taking a diuretic (medication used to reduce fluid buildup in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(21) Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 16's dignity was maintained by not putting pants on the resident when staff assisted [gender] to dress for the day. The sample size was 1 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the undated facility policy Resident's Rights For Skilled Nursing Facilities revealed residents have the right to a dignified existence and the facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident. Residents are to be treated with dignity and have the right to retain and use personal possessions, including furnishings, and clothing unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents. B. Review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated comprehensive assessment used for the development of resident care plans) dated 12/20/23 indicated the resident had diagnoses of: Cerebral Palsy, dementia, high blood pressure, weakened bladder control and depression. The MDS further indicated the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-00605(8) Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to evaluate the use of a seatbelt as a restraint for 1 (Resident 84) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Restraints with a revision date of 12/5/23 revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure the appropriate use and application of restraints and to prevent residents from self-injury or injury to others. When the use of restraints is indicated, the facility must use the least restrictive alternative for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints. If a device or equipment (defined as waist, arm, wrist, leg or ankle restraint, waist belt or a safety belt) cannot be easily removed by the resident then this is a restraint. B. Record review of Resident 84's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 12/12/23 revealed diagnoses of: quadriplegia, diabetes, neurogenic bladder, anxiety, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09A Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a new PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review- a tool used to ensure residents receive the care they require for mental illness) had been completed after a diagnosis of mental illness was identified for 2 (Residents 2 and 29) out of 2 reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review with a revision date of 12/11/23 revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure residents with retardation, serious mental disorder or intellectual disability received the care and services they required in the most appropriate setting. During a residents stay, if the resident is diagnosed with a mental disorder the designated state agency will be contacted for a Level II screening. B. Review of Resident 2's admission PASRR completed on 11/5/21 at 12:25 PM revealed the resident was evaluated as a level I. The rationale…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D2b Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to provide assessment and monitoring of a pressure ulcer to ensure healing for Resident 84. The sample size was 1 and the census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of a Wound and Pressure Ulcer Management policy dated 5/29/23 revealed the purpose of the policy was to provide consistent standards of practice in wound care management. This was to ensure the promotion of healing, pain management and prevention of complications, accurate assessment, and documentation. If a pressure ulcer was present, staff were to assess/evaluate the wound weekly. Observations of the ulcer's characteristics were to be documented by the licensed nurse and should include the following: -measurements (width, length, and depth). -characteristics including wound bed, undermining (separation of the wound edges from the surrounding (opening beneath the surface of the skin) health tissue creating a pocket under the wound surface) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care nursing staff were available to answer call lights in a timely manner for Resident 26. The sample size was 17 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to develop the resident's plan of care) dated 12/11/23 revealed: -The resident was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of: anemia, heart failure, high blood pressure, pneumonia, diabetes, high cholesterol, and lung disease. -Resident had mild cognitive impairment and required substantial assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, personal hygiene and dressing. During an interview with Resident 26 on 01/03/24 at 11:40 AM, the resident indicated [gender] call light had not been answered for approximately 30-45 minutes at times and there was no specific day or time of day this occurred. In addition, the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications related to long term use of an antibiotic medication for Resident 10. The antibiotic did not specify a duration and had no supporting documentation for clinical use based on laboratory results. The sample size was 1 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program with a review date 12/15/22 revealed the following: -The purpose of the program was to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. -The Infection Control Preventionist oversees the program, and the Medical Director serves as a liaison between the facility and other medical staff members. The Consultant Pharmacist reviews antibiotics prescribed to residents during their medication regimen review and is a resource for questions. The Attending Physician prescribes appropriate antibiotics in accordance with standards of practice and facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 16) of 5 sampled residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic (a type of psychoactive medication which alters chemicals in the brain to affect changes in behavior, mood and emotion) medications related to 1) as needed anti-psychotic and anti-anxiety medications without a specified duration, 2) no evidence of ongoing evaluations completed by the physician, and 3) a diagnosis not indicated for an anti-psychotic medication. The facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medications dated 12/6/23 revealed the following: - The purpose is to evaluate behavior interventions and alternatives before using psychotropic medications and eliminate unnecessary psychotropic medications. - An unnecessary drug is any drug when used; in excessive dose including duplicate drug therapy, for excessive durations, without adequate monitoring, without adequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17B Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions to prevent the potential for cross contamination as staff failed to initiate contact precautions for Resident 84 when the resident returned from the hospital with a diagnosis of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA-a type of staph infection which is difficult to treat due to resistance to many antibiotics). The total sample size was 17 and the facility census was 33. The findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Standard and Transmission Based Precautions with a reviewed/revised date of 12/7/23 revealed the purpose of the policy was to explain the use of transmission-based precautions and to assist staff with determining the appropriate type and duration of precautions for residents. The policy further revealed Contact Precautions were to be used in addition to Standard Precautions for residents with known or suspected infections with an increased risk for contact transmission. Staff entering a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-02-10 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting had the required information. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 28.Findings are: Review of the facility policy Nursing Staff Daily Posting, last revised 12/1/25 revealed the purpose was to post the location's daily staff according to federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) staff posting requirements and revealed the following:-the facility would post daily the staffing and resident census at the beginning of each shift and update as appropriate (for each shift) and it would include the following information- location name, current date, resident census, total number and actual number of hours worked by categories of registered nurses, licensed nurses, certified nursing assistants and certified medication assistants;-this information must be prominently displayed in a clear and readable format where residents, staff members, and the public may view; and-records must be kept for 18 months or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$22,653 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $22,653 — penalty dated 2024-01-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
The other 91 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 91; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANFORD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| BROWN, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| DYKHOUSE, DANA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| ENGBRECHT, WESLEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| GASSEN, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| GULSVIG, NEIL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| HERSETH SANDLIN, STEPHANIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| LUNDEEN, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| MCCAUSLAND, MAUREEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MOLBERT, LAURIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| NORTH, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| SCHIEFFER, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SHULKIN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| TEIKEN, BRENT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| VENTLING-HERRMANN, MARNIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/30/2024 |
| WENZEL, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| FLUIT, JOEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2022 |
| OLSON, NICHOLAS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2024 |
| SCHEMA, NATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| DTN STAFFING INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/02/2024 |
| FOCUSONE SOLUTIONS | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/04/2024 |
| GRAPE TREE MEDICAL STAFFING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/13/2018 |
| MIDDLETON, AIMEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2022 |
| MORRISON, TONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| PTACEK, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2018 |
| SANDGREN, DEEANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/16/2023 |
| SIGLER, KRISTY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/06/2023 |
| PHARMERICA CORPORATION | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 62 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $703K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285177. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.