Good Samaritan Society - Superior

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 47.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 31.8 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-07-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E)Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 32.Findings Are:In an observation completed on 07/08/2025 at 8:00 AM the facility ice machine was observed in the common dining area. A thick, yellow-white flakey buildup was observed on the front of the machine where ice is dispensed. This material was also visible to the black water dispensing area as well as the fluid drain area and black grate that covered the fluid drain area. In an interview completed on 07/09/2025 at 9:00 AM with the facility Dietary Manager (DM), the DM confirmed that the buildup on the ice machine made it an uncleanable and unsanitary surface. The DM also confirmed that it was the responsibility of the dietary department to clean these portions of the machine but there was not a process in place to ensure this was completed.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(A)(ii)Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that pre-employment health assessments were completed prior to the first day of employment as required to prevent the potential for transmissible diseases for 2 of 5 sampled staff. The facility census was 37.Findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Hiring and Screening dated 3/28/25 revealed that Human Resources will conduct background checks on all new employees and transfers prior to beginning employment or transferring to a new position. All offers of employment are contingent upon successful completion of the background check, state-specific background check, professional/personal reference check, health assessment, drug screen, and any other pre-employment requirements. A pre-employment health assessment will be conducted on all external job applicants who have accepted offers of employment. The health assessment is required prior to the first day of employment and employment is contingent upon successful completion of the health assessment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 12-006.19 Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that fences on the outside perimeter were safe for residents who go outside, failed to ensure the weeds and grasses were mowed and removed from flower beds, failed to ensure that the water system electricity to the backyard pond was safe and the water in the pond was clean, failed to ensure that caulking in resident rooms was safe and sanitary in all resident rooms - this affected 3 residents (Residents 15, , and 36) of 37 sampled, and failed to ensure there were working light bulbs in the bathrooms of all resident rooms - this affected 2 residents (Resident 13 and Resident 5) of 37 residents sampled. The facility census was 37.Findings Are:A.Observation on 07/07/2025 at 9:15 AM upon arrival at the facility revealed the following: 1. The fence to the north side of the building had a vinyl fence that stretched the entire length of the building, but some parts of the fence leaned to the south. 2. A seating area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0923 — pattern
  Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure ventilation in all resident rooms was in working order. This affected 27 (Residents 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35 and 36) of 37 sampled residents. The census was 37.Findings are:Observation of the ventilation system in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/07/2025 at 11:45 AM revealed the bathroom exhaust ventilation fan would not pull up a 1-ply square of toilet paper. Observation of the ventilation system in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/07/2025 at 11:48 AM revealed the bathroom exhaust ventilation fan would not pull up a 1-ply square of toilet paper. Observation of the ventilation system in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/07/2025 at 11:51 AM revealed the bathroom exhaust ventilation fan would not pull up a 1-ply square of toilet paper. Observation of the ventilation system in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/07/2025 at 12:17 PM revealed the bathroom exhaust ventilation fan would not pull up a 1-ply square of toilet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue the required Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABN, a notice given to beneficiaries in Original Medicare to convey that Medicare is not likely to provide coverage in a specific case) to 2 (Residents 11 and 140) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 37.Findings are:A record review of a facility document titled Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage and dated 09/12/2024 revealed the notice must be reviewed with and given to the beneficiary and or their representative far enough in advance that they have time to consider the options and make an informed choice. Once the form is completed and is signed a copy must be retained by the notifier or issuer of the notice.A.A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility re-admitted Resident 11 on 03/03/2025 after an acute hospitalization with diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness and fatigue.A record review of Resident 11's Census on 07/08/2025 revealed that Resident 11's payor source was Medicare Part A starting on 03/03/2025 and ending on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G)Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to giving 1 (Resident 19) of 5 sampled residents an as needed psychotropic medication. The facility census was 32.Findings are:A record review of a facility policy titled Psychotropic Medications and dated 05/12/2025 revealed the resident will be free from any chemical restraint imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Before administration of a psychotropic medication the following must be complete: Documentation of observations of mood, symptoms or behaviors that causes the resident distress and or endanger the resident or others and responses to interventions used prior to the administration of the medication. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 19 on 07/31/2020 with a diagnosis of Dementia (a usually progressive condition marked by the development of multiple cognitive deficits (such as memory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)Based on record review and interview the facility failed to investigate allegations of resident to resident abuse and failed to submit an investigation to the state agency within 5 working days as required for 2 (Residents 15 and 190) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 37.Findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect dated 4/7/25 revealed that the purpose is to ensure that residents are not subjected to abuse by anyone; to ensure that all identified events of alleged or suspected abuse/neglect are promptly reported and investigated; and ensure a complete review by the investigation team to identify events, such as suspicious bruising of residents, occurrences, patterns and trends that may constitute abuse and to determine the direction of the investigation. Alleged or suspected violations will be reported immediately to the administrator. Intervene in any situation in order to protect residents. \ Remove any individual from the location for the protection of residents. The facility will have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain the resident/resident representative choice for bed hold (reserving a bed for a resident who has been temporarily transferred to a hospital. This ensures the resident can return to the same facility and bed upon their return if desired) as required for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident 5); and the facility failed to provide the required Ombudsman (a state appointed advocate for residents of nursing homes) notification of a resident discharge for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 38). The facility census was 37.Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold dated 12/19/24 revealed that the purpose is to ensure that the resident/resident representative is made aware of the facility's bed hold and reserve bed payment policy before and upon transfer to a hospital. At the time of transfer the facility will provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies the duration of the state bed hold policy during which a resident is permitted to return and resume residence. In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(B)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) for 3 (Residents 6, 22, and 16) of 12 sample residents. The facility census was 32.Findings are:A record review of a facility policy titled MDS 3.0 revealed the MDS Coordinator will complete a validation verification of the entire MDS. The RN (Registered Nurse) MDS Coordinator or the Designee will sign and date the MDS signifying it as complete.A record review of a document titled Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual and dated 10/2024 revealed only minutes that the respiratory therapist or respiratory nurse spends with the resident shall be recorded on the MDS in the Respiratory Therapy section.A.A record review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident 6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(ii)Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to update and implement objectives, goals, and interventions related to hospice care on the comprehensive care plan for one (Resident 33) of one sampled resident. The facility census was 37.Findings are:Record review of the facility policy and procedure for Hospice Provided Services dated 11/01/2024 revealed under Procedures paragraph 9;A coordinated comprehensive care plan of care shall be jointly developed by the location and hospice. Hospice participation in the care plan conference and input from the hospice representative is required.1. The plan of care must include directives for managing pain and other symptoms associated with hospice care and must be revised and updated as necessary to reflect the resident's current clinical, psychological, and spiritual condition.2. Location employees will address the discipline specific resident needs on the care plan.3. The hospice team and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $736K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE