Good Samaritan Society - St John's

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 46.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medication errors with the potential to negatively impact a resident's health or safety did not occur and the potential for negative effects were monitored for 2 (Residents 17 and 54) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 46. Findings are:Record review of a facility policy titled Medication Errors and dated 03/02/2026 revealed the definition of a significant medication error is one which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardized their health or safety. A.Record review of an admission Record dated 04/01/2026 revealed that the facility admitted Resident 17 on 04/18/2025 with diagnoses of mixed incontinence (the inability to control both bowel and bladder) and other disorder of the bladder. Record review of a facility document titled SAFE Resident Event and dated 01/19/2026 revealed on that date at 12:00 PM the facility identified a medication error for Resident 17. The resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i)(1) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify the causative factors in falls as they related to one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3). The facility census was 40.Record review of the facility policy dated 6/2/26 Falls Resource Packet - Rehab /Skilled revealed that the facility requires that all locations have a fall reduction program the provides organized and sustained processes that are monitored by designated employees and understood and followed by all employees. A successful fall reduction program is the responsibility of all employees. Employees are required to complete fall prevention and fall management training with a purpose to provide an evidence-based collection of information and tools for an effective fall reduction program that results in well-being for residents and employees. Medical documentation included completion of the SAFE Event Incident report and the Fall Risk Evaluation Report. Definition of a fall was the unintentional change in position coming to rest on the ground or onto the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(D)&(E) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to inform the resident or their representative in advance of treatment risks and benefits, options, and alternatives prior to administering psychotropic medications (any medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents 17, 2, and 6). The facility census was 46. Findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Psychotropic Medications dated 12/9/25 revealed that the purpose is to evaluate behavior interventions and alternatives before using psychotropic medications and to eliminate unnecessary psychotropic medications. The family/legal representative will be notified before the administration of non-emergency psychotropic medications. The consent form must be signed for the use of psychotropic medications. The Permission for Use of Psychotropic Medications form will be used to obtain consent and must be signed for the use of psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to monitor for adverse drug reactions related to antipsychotic medication use for 1 (Resident 2) of 5 residents sampled. The facility census was 46. Findings are:A record review of facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medications dated 12/09/2025 revealed: The resident will be free from any chemical restraint imposed for the purpose of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used:-without adequate monitoringProcedure:1. Before administration of non-emergency psychotropic medication, the following must be completed:4. The reduction committee will ensure that the family/legal representative and resident are notified of this change in treatment.5. If the physician prescribed an antipsychotic for the resident, a registered nurse must complete the Antipsychotic Medication Assessment and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(G)(i) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 2 (Residents 60 and 62) of 2 sampled residents who had been discharged from the facility. The facility census was 46. Findings are:Record review of a facility policy titled Discharge and Transfer dated 01/15/2026 revealed when a transfer or discharge occurs, the location must ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the medical record. A.Record review of an admission Record dated 03/31/2026 revealed the facility admitted Resident 60 on 09/22/2020 and discharged or transferred the resident to the hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 60's Progress Notes revealed on 01/06/2026 at 2:45 AM the resident complained of intolerable abdominal pain and wished to go the emergency department. At 7:06 AM the facility received a telephone call from the emergency department that the resident was being admitted to the hospital. Review of Resident 60's Electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a mandatory comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) identified dialysis services (a life-sustaining medical treatment that filters waste, toxins, and excess fluids from the blood when kidneys have failed) as required for 1 (Resident 7) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 46. Findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Dialysis Services dated 9/30/25 revealed that facilities caring for residents receiving dialysis services must have an agreement with the provider of the service. The facility will be responsible for arranging transportation to and from dialysis services. Care plan dialysis care specific to the resident: for example, unique nutritional needs or fluid restriction, avoid taking blood pressure in the arm with the fistula (a surgical connection between an artery and a vein, usually in the arm, created to make dialysis possible for kidney failure patients), and any other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan (a written plan required to be developed within 24 hours of admission detailing the instructions needed for staff to provide initial effective and person-centered quality care for a resident) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 23) to identify immediate care needs of the resident. The facility census was 46. Findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Care Plan dated 12/1/25 revealed that the purpose is to provide guidance to the interdisciplinary team in developing the initial care plan and develop a comprehensive care plan using an interdisciplinary team approach. The definition of Baseline care plan revealed that it includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of care. A baseline care plan will be developed upon admission according to federal and state regulations. The location must provide the resident and resident representative with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 11) to provide direction to staff for care required for resident diabetes (a disease characterized by high blood sugar levels when the body does not produce enough insulin to regulate blood sugar levels). The facility census was 46. Findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Care Plan dated 12/1/25 revealed the Comprehensive Care Plan is a plan of care that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Residents will receive and be provided the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment. Each resident will have an individualized, person-centered, comprehensive plan of care that will include measurable goals…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(5) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow practitioner orders to prevent constipation for 1 (Resident 2) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 46. Findings are: A.A record review of Resident 2's Facesheet dated 04/02/2026 revealed an admission date of 08/10/2016. A record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 02/11/2026 revealed under Section C for cognitive patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was dependent on staff for toilet transfers and for toileting hygiene and was always incontinent of bowels. A record review of Resident 2's undated Care Plan revealed the resident had a diagnosis of constipation. A record review of Resident 2's Medication Administration Report (MAR)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that fall prevention interventions were implemented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 17). The facility census was 46.Findings are:Record review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention and Management dated 3/31/26 revealed the purpose was to develop and implement a fall prevention and management program, identify risk factors and implement interventions before a fall occurs, to give prompt treatment after a fall occurs, and to provide guidance for documentation. The facility was to communicate fall risks and interventions to prevent a fall before it occurs, review and update the care plan with any changes/new interventions, and continue to monitor the condition and the effectiveness of the interventions. Record review of the admission Record for Resident 17 dated 3/30/26 revealed that Resident 17 admitted into the facility on 4/18/25 and had a diagnosis of repeated falls. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a mandatory comprehensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews ,and record review; the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for resident dialysis, ensure that pre-dialysis assessment and communication was completed, and failed to assess and monitor resident post dialysis as required for 1 (Resident 7) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 46. Findings Are: Record review of the facility policy titled Dialysis Services dated 9/30/25 revealed that facilities caring for residents receiving dialysis services must have an agreement with the provider of the service. Record review of the facility's Outpatient Dialysis Services Agreement dated 9/10/19 revealed that the company will provide outpatient renal dialysis services to the facility. The agreement revealed that renal dialysis services shall include items and services when ordered by the physician. The need for referral of a resident to the dialysis unit shall be determined by the resident's attending physician. Record review of the admission Record dated 3/31/26 for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-28 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $974K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE