No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Good Samaritan Society - Waconia And Westview Acre

333 Fifth Street West, Waconia, MN 55387 · Non profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (952) 442-5111 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (952) 442-5111 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025Resident-funds citation (F0568)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$27,378 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $27,378 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-12)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
490 S Maple St · (952) 442-8080 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.2 mi
121 Depot Dr · (952) 442-2146 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.4 mi
10610 10th St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Main St W · (952) 442-2184 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
138 1st St W · (952) 446-9090

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.7%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%4.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.3%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.2%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.8%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%4.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.2%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.6%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.4%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.8%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%17.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.3%82.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%23.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.9%14.8%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 163 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.2%CMS range 55.0–68.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.4–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified85.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.2–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.701.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.10
RN hours/ resident / day
0.44
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.48
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.67
RN hoursweekends
51.9%
Total nursing turnover
54.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 69.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision creating a likelihood for potential serious harm, injury, impairment, or death for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was assessed to be at risk for elopement on [DATE] and wore a Wander Guard bracelet (security device that prevents alerts staff if a resident at risk of wandering attempts to leaving a designated area) and eloped from the facility on [DATE]. The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE], when R1 exited the facility front door at 12:54 a.m., then was found by a community member lying in the parking lot of an apartment building. The facility identified R1 was missing when a county sheriff came to the facility at 2:56 a.m., showed R1's photo to staff, and staff discovered R1 was not in his bed. The facility administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 5:38 p.m. The deficient practice corrected on [DATE], prior to the start of the survey and was therefore past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were accurately identified and dispensed upon discharge, resulting in one resident (R214) being sent home with another resident's (R221) medications. This failure led to R214 ingesting medications not prescribed to her. This resulted in actual harm when R214 required emergency medical intervention and hospitalization due to hypotension (low blood pressure). Findings include: R214's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R214 had intact cognition, and had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat that originates in the heart's upper chambers), anemia (low red blood cells) and depression. R214 was admitted to the transitional care unit (TCU) for rehab, on 3/14/25, following hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of hypertension with shortness of breath. R214's Discharge or Therapeutic Leave Medication List assessment dated [DATE], lacked a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to assure that 1 of 3 residents (R213) reviewed for pressure ulcers received care and services to prevent occurrence of newly developed pressure ulcer. This failure resulted in actual harm to R213 when the facility failed to follow R213's care plan resulting in the development of a deep tissue injury (a type of pressure injury where the underlying tissue is damaged, but the skin may appear intact. It's characterized by a localized discoloration, often purple or maroon, and may have a blood-filled blister. deep tissue injury can develop into a larger, open wound, but it's initially a localized injury). Although noncompliance was present at the time of the event, the facility implemented appropriate corrective action prior to the survey resulting in a finding of past-noncompliance for R213. Findings include: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 5/4/25 at 12:12 p.m., (approximately 12 hours after facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to include complete and accurate information when assessing elopement risk for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement. Findings include:R1's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE] identified R1 had a caregiver or staff change, had a change in normal behavior, and had no learning barriers. R1 was deemed not at risk for elopement. The assessment lacked indication R1 was admitted within the last month, had a history of elopement from home, had increased confusion and forgetfulness, diagnosis of dementia with psychosis, and had learning barriers related to his cognitive status as indicated in the admission Nursing Assessment on 11/26/25.R1's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE], identified R1 was admitted within the previous month, had a caregiver or staff change, had a diagnosis of dementia, R1 should not leave the facility unattended, and a Wander Guard was placed to alert staff of R1's movements. R1 was deemed an elopement risk and a care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans that included all identified needs and appropriate interventions for 4 of 18 residents (R10, R25, R72, and R88) reviewed for care planning.Findings include:R10R10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R10 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R10's diagnoses included anxiety disorder (excessive worry), depression (persistent sadness), PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder; stress after trauma), and mild cognitive impairment of unknown etiology (early memory/thinking changes with unclear cause). Review of R10's comprehensive care plan, print date of 3/26/26, failed to include person-centered interventions related to R10's trauma history, including approaches to minimize triggers, promote emotional safety, or individualized care preferences. During interview on 3/26/26 at 9:55 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect by continuing use of a Wander Guard device in a manner that caused ongoing distress and failed to attempt alternative placement to reduce discomfort for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (R25).Findings include:R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R25 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R25's diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia (cognitive decline not caused by Alzheimer's disease), muscle weakness (reduced strength), abnormalities of gait and mobility (difficulty walking), hypertension (high blood pressure), arthritis (joint inflammation causing pain), and insomnia (difficulty sleeping). During observation on 03/23/2026 at 2:44 p.m., R25 was observed with a Wander Guard applied to the left wrist. R25 stated, I have to have this on so I don't go anywhere. I have gone outside once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct the initial and quarterly care conferences for 1 of 18 residents (R60) reviewed for care conferences.Findings include:R60's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R60 was admitted on [DATE], cognitively intact, and had the following diagnoses: peripheral vascular disease (poor circulation in the limbs), benign prostatic hypertrophy (enlarged prostrate), renal insufficiency, hyperlipidemia (elevated level of fat in the blood stream), and depression.R60's medical record lacked evidence a care conference was offered or conducted since admission.On 3/25/26 at 8:03 a.m., the administrator confirmed the facility had no record of any care conferences being conducted for R60.On 3/26/26 at 9:55 a.m., the social work designee (SW)-A and the director of nursing (DON) stated care conferences were organized by the social worker in cooperation with the MDS coordinator and should have been conducted within 3 days of admission, quarterly, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to 1 of 1 resident (R36) reviewed for personal funds. Findings include:R36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R36 admitted [DATE], cognitively intact, and had the following diagnoses: heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), renal insufficiency, diabetes, and schizophrenia.On 3/23/26 at 1:20 p.m., R36 stated the facility was responsible for management of their money, but they had no idea what was going on with the account and the facility received their statements.On 3/26/26 at 12:12 p.m., the business office manager (BOM) stated they received monthly statements at R36's request and then met with the resident to explain and provide the documents to them. Additionally, the BOM confirmed they had no documentation to confirm conversations or explanations occurred.R36's medical record lacked evidence of agreement or statements were provided or explained to R36.On 3/26/26 at 12:50 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, facility failed to contact provider for 1 of 2 residents (R82) who expressed a plan to discharge against medical advice (AMA).R82's care plan dated 1/9/26, indicated R82 wished to return home in community pending therapy outcomes. Interventions included facility to make arrangements with required community resources to support independence post-discharge for example home care, physical and/or occupational therapy. R82 required assistance with dressing, transfers, ambulation, bathing and toile use.R82's face sheet undated, indicated R82 had diagnoses which included diabetes, dizziness, anxiety, chronic pain, muscle weakness, falls, abnormal gait and mobility, need for assistance with personal care. Care conference progress note dated 1/26/26, at 11:35 indicated therapy planned to end 1/28/26, therapy recommended assisted living facility for medication management, eating and cognitive concerns on living at home. R82's friends expressed concerns regarding R82's living conditions. R82 expressed desire to return home with county services. Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary (recapitulation of stay) was completed for 1 of 1 resident (R80) reviewed for hospitalization who did not return to the facility and for 1 of 1 resident (R82) reviewed for transfer and discharge. Findings include: R80's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R80 had intact cognition and required some assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R80's diagnoses included other gram-negative sepsis, hypertension, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, non-Alzheimer's dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gross hematuria, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary retention, unspecified hydronephrosis, hydrocele, right testicular pain, long-term use of insulin, and a personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. Review of R80's progress notes indicated R80 was transferred from the facility to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 2 of 18 residents (R10 and R11) reviewed for care planning.Findings include:R10R10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R10 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R10's diagnoses included encounter for other orthopedic aftercare (follow-up care after bone/joint treatment), GERD (acid reflux), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), arthritis (joint inflammation), osteoporosis (weak/brittle bones), anxiety disorder (excessive worry), depression (persistent sadness), PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder; stress after trauma), rotator cuff tear/rupture of the right shoulder (tear of shoulder tendons), hereditary ataxia (genetic condition causing poor coordination), demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (damage to nerve covering affecting signals), chondromalacia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to reflect a change in mobility status for 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for care planning related to wheelchair use.Findings include:R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R25 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R25's diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia (cognitive decline not caused by Alzheimer's disease), muscle weakness (reduced strength), abnormalities of gait and mobility (difficulty walking), hypertension (high blood pressure), arthritis (joint inflammation causing pain), and insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Review of R25's comprehensive care plan, with a print date of 3/26/26, indicated R25 required assistance of one staff with a front wheeled walker for mobility. During the following observations, no use of a front wheeled walker was observed:3/24/26 at 3:26 p.m., R25 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure shaving was offered or provided for 1 of 1 residents (R15) reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R15 had severe cognitive impairments and required staff assistance with ADLs. R15's diagnoses included diabetes, Parkinson's disease, dementia, anxiety and chronic pain. R15's care plan revised 3/7/26, indicated R15 had a self-care deficit related to Parkinson's disease with interventions that included resident required assistance from one staff for bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. On 3/23/26, at 11:25 a.m. observed R15 to have gray hairs on chin, above upper lip and below lower lip, about an inch in length. During follow-up observations on 3/24/26, at 12:37 p.m., 3/24/26, at 3:48 p.m., 3/24/26, at 6:55 p.m., 3/25/26, at 8:29 a.m., 3/25/26, at 4:15 p.m. and 3/26/26, at 7:16 a.m. R15 continued to have long gray hair on chin, above upper lip…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice by not following provider-ordered edema management interventions, including assistance with application and removal of compression stockings, and by inaccurately documenting care on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for 1 of 3 residents (R25) reviewed for edema management.Findings include:R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R25 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R25's diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia (cognitive decline not caused by Alzheimer's disease), muscle weakness (reduced strength), abnormalities of gait and mobility (difficulty walking), hypertension (high blood pressure), arthritis (joint inflammation causing pain), and insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Review of R25's physician orders, dated 3/4/26, indicated an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring of pressure ulcers for 2 of 4 residents (R2 and R15) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This had the potential to delay identification of changes in wound status and impact timely interventions to promote healing. F686 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring of pressure ulcers for 3 of 4 residents (R2, R15 and R 72) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This had the potential to delay identification of changes in wound status and impact timely interventions to promote healing. Findings include: The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) guidelines dated 2016, identified a pressure ulcer as, . localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. These are then staged according to the following criteria: - Stage I Pressure Injury: Non-blanchable erythema (redness) of intact skin. - Stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure effective communication of necessary clinical information to the dialysis center for 1 of 1 resident (R88) reviewed for dialysis services.Findings include:R88's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R88 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R88's diagnoses included dependence on renal dialysis (requires routine dialysis treatment to perform kidney function), chronic kidney disease stage 5 (severe kidney failure where the kidneys no longer function adequately), and presence of other vascular implants and grafts (surgically placed devices or vessels used to support blood flow, often for dialysis access). Review of R88's electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R88 received routine dialysis treatments at an external dialysis center on a scheduled basis (Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays). Review of facility documentation, including dialysis communication forms and transfer records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a trauma-informed care approach was implemented by not completing a trauma assessment upon admission for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for trauma-informed care.Findings include:R10R10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R10 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R10's diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event), anxiety disorder (excessive worry), and depression (persistent feelings of sadness). Review of R10's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence a trauma assessment was completed upon admission to identify past trauma, triggers, or individualized care needs related to trauma history. Review of R10's comprehensive care plan, print date 3/26/26, did not include trauma-informed interventions, approaches to minimize triggers, or strategies to promote emotional safety.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act upon consultant pharmacist recommendations in a timely manner related to completion of an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment for 1 of 3 residents (R11) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R11 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R11's diagnoses included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a progressive brain disorder causing changes in thinking, movement, and behavior), non-Alzheimer's dementia (decline in memory and thinking not caused by Alzheimer's disease), and depression (persistent sadness or loss of interest). The MDS indicated R11 received antipsychotic medication. R11's physician order summary report, dated 3/4/26, included an order for Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication used to treat mood and thought disorders) 25 milligrams (mg) to be administered at bedtime for repeated episodes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement an infection prevention and control program to prevent the spread of infection by not initiating Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance. when indicated and failing to ensure staff followed EBP during resident care for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for infection control (R11, R46, and R88).Findings include: Review of CDC guidelines dated 8/12/22, identified EBP are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. EBP may be indicated (when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with any of the following: Wounds or indwelling medical devices, regardless of MDRO colonization status. CDC guidelines updated 6/28/24 identified examples of indwelling medical devices include, but are not limited to, central vascular catheters (including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include current behaviors for 1 of 1 residents (R51), toileting needs for 1 of 1 residents (R20), discontinued medications for 1 of 1 residents (R24), resident receiving tube feedings for 1 of 1 residents (R7), and falls for 1 of 1 residents (R55) in the sample whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: R51's Face Sheet printed 5/27/25, indicated the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation. R51's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R50 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. During observation and interview on 5/18/25 at 4:24 p.m., it was observed that R51 had long finger nails on all fingers and thumbs. Some of which were 1/4 inched in length. R51 was also noted to have been unshaven, noting a rechargeble razor on resident's bed. R51 stated, I was meaning to cut them…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pillows were not used in a manner to restrain residents while in bed for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for restraints. Findings include: R21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses of dementia, Parkinson's, seizure disorder and depression. MDS also indicated R21 did not use any restraints. R21's care plan reviewed 5/27/25, identified R21 had limited physical mobility and was a fall risk related to confusion and restlessness. Staff were directed to assist R21 from lying to sitting and from sitting to lying with an assist of one to help guide lower extremities and to assist R21 with an assist of two for sit to stand for all transfer. R21 used a fall mat next to his bed. R21's care plan did not identify the use of pillows under his fitted sheet to prevent R21 from crawling out of bed. During an observation on 5/18/25 at 5:20 p.m., R21 was lying on his back in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy consultant (PharmD) gradual dose reduction (GDR) recommendation was communicated to the Hospice prescriber for 1 of 5 residents (R43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: In review of R43's Order Summary Report (print date 5/27/25) indicated the diagnoses of: dementia, visual hallucinations, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. R43's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R43 had severely cognitive impairment. R43 was admitted to Allina Hospice with the diagnosis of vascular dementia [due to] CVA (cerebral vascular accident - stroke) on 1/29/25, with the orders to use hospice agency standing orders. In review of R43's Order Recap Report (printed 5/20/25) resident was and is receiving Quetiapine Furmarate ( and anti-psychotic medication with the following order changes: The following orders were prescribed on the dates indicated to the facility: 3/26/25 Quetiapine Fumarate Oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure incidents were reported timely to the State agency (SA) for 2 of 4 residents (R213 and R214) whose incidents were reviewed. Findings include: R213's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R213 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Diagnoses included depression, anxiety, radiation sickness, lung cancer, breast cancer, thyrotoxicosis (a condition where there is too much thyroid hormone in the body), muscle weakness, metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where a change in brain function, like confusion or decreased consciousness, is caused by an underlying metabolic or chemical imbalance in the body), diabetes and acute kidney failure. R213's care plan revised 5/4/25, indicated R213 had potential to develop pressure sores related to impaired mobility and incontinence with an intervention instructing staff to reposition R213 from side to side when in bed every two to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and protect residents from an allegation of neglect for 1 of 4 residents (R214) whose incidents were reviewed. Findings include: R214's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R214 had intact cognition, and had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat that originates in the heart's upper chambers), anemia (low red blood cells) and depression. A report was received by the SA, dated 5/1/25 at 12:59 p.m., which indicated R214 was seen in the clinic last week (4/22/25) for a visit after R214 was discharged from the transitional care unit (TCU) at facility. According to the report, R214 had been in and out of the facility twice prior to her being seen in clinic. R214 brought all her medications with her from home to her appointment and it was then discovered there were two bubble medication cards that had medications missing and a few remaining labeled with another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded with the potential for inaccurate federal reimbursement and resident care planning for 2 of 2 residents (R49 and R59) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: R49's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated under Section J (J1700-B) Falls documented R49 did not have any falls since the last MDS Assessment (admission MDS, submitted 1/14/25). In review of R49's electronic medical record (EMR), it was noted R49 had two falls since admission: 2/2/25 - R49 rolled out of bed and onto the floor 2/4/25 - R49 self transferred from wheel chair and fell to the floor During an interview on 5/21/25 at 10:33 a.m., nurse manager (RN)-A and interim director of nursing (DON)-A stated R49's two falls should have been documented on the 4/10/25 quarterly MDS. R59's Discharge Return Not Anticipated MDS submission dated 3/6/25, indicated under Section A (A2105) Discharge Status documented R59 was discharge to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the county (designated state mental health authority) when 1 of 3 residents (R2) had a new on-set of mental illness. Findings include: R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R2's admission record printed 5/18/25, indicated R2 had diagnoses of unspecified dementia with effective date of 10/1/22, psychotic disorder with delusions effective date 2/10/22, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood effective date 3/10/22. R2's current, undated medication administration record (MAR) identified R2 had an antipsychotic medication, Haloperidol 0.5 milligrams (mg) every two hours as needed for agitation, delusions, or psychosis. R2's care plan revised 11/27/23, identified R2 had mood and behavior problems related to major depression, psychosis, recent history of hallucinations and delusion, verbally rude, angry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 3 of 5 residents (R35. R41 and R215) reviewed for care plans. Findings include: R35's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R35 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R35's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, heart failure, hypertension, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, depression, dependence on renal dialysis, and chronic pain. R35's electronic health record (EHR) indicated R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. EHR lacked evidence a baseline care plan had been initiated within 48 hours of admission. EHR indicated baseline care plan was developed on 4/18/25 and indicated R35 was dependent on staff for transfers, toileting and grooming/bathing. R41's admission MDS dated [DATE], identified R41 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with ADL's. R41's diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed, accurate, and revised to assure assessed care needs were implemented for 1 of 2 residents (R35) reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: R35's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R35 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R35's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, heart failure, hypertension, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, depression, dependence on renal dialysis, and chronic pain. R35's physician orders, print date of 5/21/25, indicated an order for dialysis on Monday/Wednesday/Friday at Fresenius Waconia with a start date of 4/15/25. R35's care plan, print date of 5/21/25, failed to include dialysis including goals of treatment, and interventions allowing the nurse to assess the intervention's outcome and potentially revise care based on the resident's status. During interview on 5/27/25 at 3:49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) medications were administered per physician's order for 1 of 1 resident (R20) reviewed for edema. Findings include: R41's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R41 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R41's diagnoses included acute on chronic systolic (Congestive) heart failure, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, localized edema, presence of prosthetic heart valve, and presence of coronary angioplasty implant and graft R41's physician orders with print date of 5/19/25, indicated R41 had an order for daily weights in the morning for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and to update physician assistant (PA) or medical doctor (MD) if increased of three pounds in a day or five pounds in a week. R41 also had an order for Torsemide 20 milligrams (mg) as needed (PRN) for HFrEF daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and develop interventions to address falls for 1 of 1 residents (R55) identified to have repeated falls. Findings include: R55's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R55 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R55's fall care area assessment (CAA) dated 4/13/25, indicated R55 had no recent falls. R55 was a fall risk due to wandering behavior, impaired cognition, and was new admission. R55's face sheet printed 5/18/25, indicated R55 had dementia, macular degeneration (progressive eye disease, gradually leads to loss of central vision), repeated falls, congestive heart failure, spinal fusion and difficulty walking. R55's care plan revised 5/2/25, indicated R55 had an actual fall with no injury related to forgetfulness and not wearing proper footwear. Care plan interventions directed staff to ensure R55 was wearing gripper socks if he was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist recommendations for as needed (PRN) anti-psychotic medications were acted upon and addressed in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents (R43) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: In review of R43's Order Summary Report (print date 5/27/25) indicated the diagnoses of: dementia, visual hallucinations, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. R43's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R43 had severe cognitive impairment. R43 was admitted to Allina Hospice with the diagnosis of vascular dementia [due to] CVA (cerebral vascular accident - stroke) on 1/29/25, with the orders to use hospice agency standing orders. In review of R43's Order Recap Report (printed 5/20/25) resident was and is receiving Quetiapine Furmarate ( and anti-psychotic medication with the following order changes: 3/26/25 Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 50 milligrams (mg) (Quetiapine Fumarate) Give 100 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure orthostatic blood pressure monitoring was completed for 1 of 5 residents (R55) reviewed for unnecessary medication use and who consumed antipsychotic medication on a routine basis. In addition, the facility failed to routinely assess residents who received antipsychotic medications for signs and symptoms of tardive dyskinesia (disorder that results in involuntary repetitive body movements) for 1 of 5 residents (R215) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R55's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R55 had moderate cognitive impairment, required extenisve assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs)., and consumed antipsychotic medications on a daily basis. R55's care plan revised 4/18/25, indicated R55 was on antipsychotic medication therapy related to anxiety with interventions of monitor resident condition based on clinical practice guidelines or clinical standards and consult with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during dining services for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for assistance with meal set-up. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R1's diagnoses included hypertension, neurogenic bladder, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, atrial fibrillation and depression. During observation on 5/19/25 at 5:14 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-D assisted R1 with applying ketchup to his bun. NA-D took individual ketchup packets from the middle of the table and removed the top of R1's hamburger bun off, applied ketchup and used the ketchup packet to spread the ketchup around and placed the top bun on pulled pork sandwich. NA-D did not sanitize hands before or after assisting R1 and did not wear gloves. During interview on 5/19/25 at 5:23 p.m., NA-D stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure recommended pneumococcal vaccinations, as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), were offered and/or provided in a timely manner to reduce the risk of severe disease for 2 of 6 residents (R20 and R49) reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults feature, dated 3/2023, identified several tables with corresponding recommendations when to receive various versions (i.e., PPSV23, PCV13, PCV20) of the pneumococcal vaccine. The graph labeled, Adults [at or older than] [AGE] years old, outlined persons with a complete series of pneumococcal vaccination (i.e., PCV13 at any age, PPSV23 at or above [AGE] years old) should have shared clinical decision-making between the resident and healthcare provider to determine if PCV20 was appropriate. R20's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 as having the diagnoses of diabetes, thyroid disorder, anxiety and depression, and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess wounds with measurements and consistently implement interventions to promote healing of current pressure ulcers (PU) for 1 of 3 residents (R3). Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated severe cognitive impairment, required substantial assistance with footwear, had one unhealed Stage 3 PU (full thickness loss of skin) and at risk for developing more, and did not exhibit rejection of care behaviors. R3's care plan dated 2/10/25, indicated R3 had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to her left lateral (outer side) ankle with interventions included provide pressure reducing mattress and pressure reducing cushion in wheelchair, notify nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown, R3 had an activities of daily living (ADL) performance deficit with interventions included resident requires assistance of one staff apply surgical shoe on right foot and shoe on left foot. R3's care plan lacks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing, routine toenail care was provided to prevent potential foot-related complications for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed who had long, unkept toenails. Findings include: R1's significant change minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and bilateral broken legs. R1's care plan dated 1/15/25 indicated R1 required assistance of one staff member for weekly bed baths. The care plan instructed weekly skin observation by licensed nurse and to keep fingernails short but did not address toenail care. R1's medical record was reviewed and lacked information on resident refusal of toenail care and any ongoing monitoring and/or treatments to ensure R1's toenails were cared for timely and on an ongoing basis to reduce her risk of foot-related complications secondary to long toenails. On 2/25/25 at 1:09 p.m., R1 was interviewed and stated staff clip her fingernails, but no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to perform a comprehensive assessment of falls to include identifying a root cause and also failed to implement appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R4) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R2's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition, no falls since the previous assessment and diagnoses included dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R2's care plan dated 2/4/25 indicated R2 was at risk for falls related to weakness and shortness of breath with interventions of educate/instruct resident and family on usage of assistive devices added 10/15/23, remind resident not to bend over to pick up dropped items, encourage use of grabber or to ask for assistance added 10/15/23, and ensure resident is wearing appropriate footwear when ambulating or mobilizing in wheelchair added 10/15/23. The care plan also indicated R3 was independent with four wheeled walker for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for 2 of 3 residents (R5, R9) who reported concerns related to quality of care. Findings include: Facility investigation indicated the director of nursing (DON) was notified via email on 9/16/24 at 4:24 p.m., from administrative assistant (AA)-D the facility had two bad apples working there. The document included handwritten notes dated 9/18/24 at 11:50 a.m., listing licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B and nursing assistant (NA)-A had not completed nightly rounds and refused to complete requested cares stating the next shift could complete them. Further, the document indicated R5's name dated 9/18/24 at 12:10 p.m. Information listed included LPN-B and NA-A had laughed when he reported he had chest pain, had not followed up on the report with any assessment or monitoring, and they had spoke to him and other residents in a condescending or argumentative way. Facility investigation lacked evidence other residents and other staff were interviewed about the identified concerns. Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to consistently administer medication in the time frame allotted (one hour before and after assigned time) for 1 of 2 residents, (R2), reviewed for receiving a combination medication used for treatment of Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination). Findings include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated R2 was cognitively intact and was able to communicate needs and identify preferences. The MDS identified R2 had a medically complex condition. R2's MDS identified medical diagnoses, which included arthritis due to other bacteria, sepsis (infection of the bloodstream) due to methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-a type of infection which is resistant to many antibiotics), a cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke), and Parkinson's disease. A review of R2's medication administration record for September of 2024 indicated R2 was to receive Sinemet (Carbidopa-Levodopa-a medication used in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 4 kitchen fans were free of lint buildup and cleaned on a regular schedule. This had the potential to affect all the residents, staff, and visitors who consumed food from the main kitchen. Findings Include: During observation in the main kitchen on 8/14/24 at 9:21 a.m., fan #1 was attached near a corner of a wall, approximately 7 ½ feet off the ground, and slightly angled down. This fan moved air into the dish return and cleaning area. Fan #2 was attached near a corner of a wall, approximately 7 ½ feet off the ground, and slight angled down. This fan moved air by one refrigerator, one freezer, and into the steam tray holding area. Fan #3 was attached on a wall, approximately 7 ½ feet off the ground, and angled down. This fan blew into the kitchen prep zone which also includes the fryer, steamers, and mixer. All three fans had lint build up on the wire guard (shroud that protects the fan blades). This build up was noticeable on the front and rear portions with multiple strands of lint,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain wheelchairs in a clean and sanitary manner for 2 of 2 residents (R20 and R15) reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment and for 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed who had enteral feeding liquid spilled on the tube feeding (TF) pump and support legs of the pole. Findings include: R20's facesheet printed on 8/15/24, included diagnoses of cerebral hemorrhage (a type of stroke that causes bleeding in the brain), Parkinsonism (movements associated with Parkinson's disease such as stiffness and tremor) and arthritis. R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R20 was cognitively intact, had clear speech, could understand and be understood. R20 required substantial assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL), except eating in which she was independent with set-up help. R20 did not walk and utilized a manual wheelchair. R20's care plan, printed 8/15/24, did not address…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the administrative staff and State Agency (SA) were notified immediately but no later than 2 hours of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 residents (R5) who reported abusive cares during toileting cares provided by staff. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 did not present any inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness. The MDS indicated R5 had moderately impaired cognitive skills for decision making regarding tasks of daily life and there were short- and long-term memory problems, according to staff interview. The MDS also indicated R5 required substantial to maximal assistance from a staff helper with toileting hygiene and could be independent with personal hygiene. The MDS listed diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) of the left side, high blood pressure, dementia (the loss of cognitive function, like thinking, remembering, and reasoning), anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and implement appropriate interventions for 1 of 1 residents (R5) reviewed for abuse allegations. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 did not present any inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness. The MDS indicated R5 had moderately impaired cognitive skills for decision making regarding tasks of daily life and there were short and long-term memory problems, according to staff interview. The MDS also indicated R5 required substantial to maximal assistance from a staff helper with toileting hygiene and could be independent with personal hygiene. The MDS listed diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) of the left side, high blood pressure, dementia (the loss of cognitive function, like thinking, remembering, and reasoning), anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia (mental health disorder that can affect a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate orthostatic blood pressure monitoring was in place for 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed for psychotropic medications; in addition, the facility failed to implement bowel movement (BM) protocol for 1 of 4 residents (r43) reviewed for constipation. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated there was no inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness present. The MDS indicated according to staff, R5 had moderately impaired cognitive skills for decision making regarding tasks of daily life and there were short and long-term memory problems. The MDS also indicated R5 required substantial to maximal assistance from a staff helper with toileting hygiene and could be independent with personal hygiene. The MDS listed diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) of the left side, high blood pressure, dementia (the loss of cognitive function, like thinking, remembering,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practice for 1 of 2 residents (R17) reviewed for urinary catheter care. In addition, the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 4 residents (R33) reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R17 R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R17 as cognitively intact, no rejection of care behaviors, dependent on most activities of daily living (ADL), and indicated an indwelling catheter. Diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve problem), hyponatremia (low sodium levels), and multiple sclerosis (MS) (chronic disease of the central nervous system). R17's physician order dated 3/4/24, indicated R17 received Hiprex (antibiotic) tablet 1 gram by mouth two times a day for urinary anti-infective. R17's care plan (CP) dated 5/16/13 indicated, the resident has an Indwelling Catheter R/T MS, Neurogenic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-05-27 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to consistently post the census on the nurse staff posting. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility and/or visitors who may wish to view the information. Findings include: On 5/18/25 at 11:05 a.m., unable to locate a staff posting when arrived at facility. On 5/18/25 at 6:35 p.m., staff posting was observed in a magnetic clip on the metal doorframe of the administration office on first floor. The posting identified nursing staff shifts, census and number of staff assigned each shift. On 5/19/25 at 3:00 p.m., the staff posting with the current date was clipped to the administration office doorframe, clip was positioned about six feet off the floor. On 5/20/25 at 12:28 p.m., the staff posting was positioned on the doorframe about six feet from the floor dated Monday 5/19/25. At 2:15 p.m., the staff posting was updated with current date, continued to be clipped about six feet from the floor. On 5/21/25 at 11:40 a.m., the staff posting was dated 5/20/25, continued to be about six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$27,378 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $27,378 — penalty dated 2026-05-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 91 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Edgebrook Care CenterEdgerton, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan - IndianolaIndianola, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan - Red OakRed Oak, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - AtkinsonAtkinson, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BlackduckBlackduck, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Grand Island VillageGrand Island, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - LakotaLakota, ND 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Mary Jane BrownLuverne, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Luke's VillageKearney, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - WindomWindom, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society De SmetDe Smet, SD 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society MillerMiller, SD 1 of 5Salem Lutheran HomeElk Horn, IA 1 of 5Souris Valley Care CenterVelva, ND 1 of 5St Vincent's - A Prospera CommunityBismarck, ND 1 of 5Sunset Drive - a Prospera CommunityMandan, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan - AtwoodAtwood, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - Decatur CountyOberlin, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - EsthervilleEstherville, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - MansonManson, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - OttumwaOttumwa, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - WaukonWaukon, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BottineauBottineau, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Hastings VillageHastings, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - OakesOakes, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Park RiverPark River, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care CommunityRobbinsdale, MN 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St John'sKearney, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Martin VillageRapid City, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - SuperiorSuperior, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society CantonCanton, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Luther ManorSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society New UnderwoodNew Underwood, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls CenterSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls VillageSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan-LiberalLiberal, KS 2 of 5The Good Samaritan Society-Kissimmee VillageKissimmee, FL 3 of 5Good Samaritan - AlgonaAlgona, IA 3 of 5Good Samaritan - DavenportDavenport, IA 3 of 5Good Samaritan - HolsteinHolstein, IA

Showing 40 of 91; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SANFORDOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2019
THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2019
BROWN, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DYKHOUSE, DANAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
ENGBRECHT, WESLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
GASSEN, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
GULSVIG, NEILIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
HERSETH SANDLIN, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
LUNDEEN, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
MCCAUSLAND, MAUREENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MOLBERT, LAURISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
NORTH, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
SCHIEFFER, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SHULKIN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
TEIKEN, BRENTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
VENTLING-HERRMANN, MARNIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
WENZEL, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FLUIT, JOELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022
MIDDLETON, AIMEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2022
OLSON, NICHOLASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2024
SCHEMA, NATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
GIWOJNA, ALYSSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025
MCMICHAEL, TARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2018
MORRISON, TONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
SANDGREN, DEEANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2023
DTN STAFFING INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/02/2024
FOCUSONE SOLUTIONSOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2024
GRAPE TREE MEDICAL STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/13/2018
PHARMERICA CORPORATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 56 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 17%Medicare 4%Other / private 79%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$201per resident / day
operating cost
$6,113per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$209per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245234. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next