Salem Lutheran Home
2027 College Avenue, Elk Horn, IA 51531 · For profit - Corporation · 64 certified beds · (712) 764-4201 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.3% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.7% | 4.2% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.3% | 3.8% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.6% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.1% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.3% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.0% | 19.5% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.7% | 20.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.6% | 13.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.86 | 1.49 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.92 | 2.08 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.5%CMS range 28.4–52.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.6–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 29.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 5.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 5.3–16.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 47.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility document review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of significant medication errors for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). On 4/1/26, staff failed to remove the plastic backing off of a Fentanyl (a powerful synthetic opioid) patch for which resulted in Resident #1 not receiving any medication through the patch and experiencing more pain and required an increase in the use of liquid morphine (a powerful, naturally occurring opioid analgesic derived from the opium poppy, primarily used to treat moderate to severe acute or chronic pain) medication until 4/3/26 when a new Fentanyl patch was replaced. The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Findings include:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 for which indicated severe cognitive decisions, is able to be understood and understands others, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record review, hospital record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to investigate a change in condition for three of three residents reviewed (Residents #22, #25, and #42). Two of the residents had a sudden increase of pain (Residents #22 and #25). Resident #22 walked independently in the facility and experienced a bout of dizziness causing her to fall on 5/13/23. At the time of the fall, Resident #22 denied pain but started to report pain later that evening and requested pain medication. Resident #22 did not use any as needed medication until after her fall on 5/13/23. Resident #22 received no evaluation by a provider until 5/17/23. During the hospital stay, the staff determined Resident #22 had multiple compression fractures in her back. Resident #22 received treatment to one of the compression fractures involving an invasive procedure. Resident #25 received a scheduled pain medication for chronic pain and used a standing lift for transfers. Resident #25 reported that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, emergency room, hospital and facility record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent injuries for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #22, #25, and #33) for falls. In addition, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for falls. Despite the facility documenting that Resident #25 had difficulties with standing with her transfers using the mechanical standing lift, no one adjusted the transfer technique to ensure her safety with transfers. Due to the staff continuing to transfer Resident #25 with an unsafe technique, she fell out of the standing lift resulting in a compression fracture in her back. Resident #33 had a history of falls and the facility added interventions to the Incident Report or the Progress notes but never updated the Care Plan to reflect the interventions. In addition, the facility knew that some of the interventions did not work but did not modify the intervention. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy and procedure review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident #4). The facility identified a census of 46 residents.Findings include:Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated intact cognitive decisions, is able to be understood and understands others, and no behaviors or mood present. The MDS addressed the residents as dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene) dependent on transfers and once in an electric wheelchair independent in the facility. The MDS included diagnosis of heart failure, hypertension (a condition where blood force against artery wall is consistently too high forcing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a pain patch that was not activated for 48 hours for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Residents #1). The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Findings include:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 for which indicated severe cognitive decisions, is able to be understood and understands others, with hallucinations and delusions present along with resisting of cares. The MDS addressed the resident as substantial to maximal assistance on staff for all activities of daily living (toileting, oral and personal hygiene, and upper and lower body dressing) and pain described as frequent with intensity of a 2 out of a numeric scale of 1-10, and poor prognosis with an opioid used within the last 7 days. The MDS included diagnosis of hypertension (a condition where blood force against the artery wall is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of abuse involving mistreatment, neglect, and injuries of unknown source were reported to the Department of Inspection and Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) within 2 hours for 2 of 3 resident reviewed. (Resident #2 and Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicating severely impaired cognitive decisions. Resident #2 could understand others and others usually understood them. They have no behavior, mood or delirium. Resident #2 required partial to moderate assistance with all aspects of daily living (dressing, personal hygiene, transfers, oral hygiene and positioning) and no falls documented and a use of an anti-coagulant (medications that prevent blood from clotting or stop existing clots from getting larger)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to investigate injuries of unknown injury for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and Resident #9). Resident #2 had a bruise on the right wrist and Resident #9 had a bruise underneath the left eye. The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Finding include:1. Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicating severely impaired cognitive decisions. Resident #2 could understand others and others usually understood them. They have no behavior, mood or delirium. Resident #2 required partial to moderate assistance with all aspects of daily living (dressing, personal hygiene, transfers, oral hygiene and positioning) and no falls documented and a use of an anti-coagulant (medications that prevent blood from clotting or stop existing clots from getting larger) medication used in the last 7 days. The MDS included diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, call light logs and the facility policy/procedure, the facility staff failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner (no longer than 15 minutes) for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #4, #5 and Resident #11). The facility identified a census of 46 residents.Findings include: 1. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated intact cognitive decisions, is able to be understood and understands others, and no behaviors or mood present. The MDS addressed the residents as dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene) dependent on transfers and once in an electric wheelchair independent in the facility. The MDS included diagnosis of heart failure, hypertension (a condition where blood force against artery wall is consistently too high forcing the heart to work harder),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility investigation review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly destroy Resident #1's narcotic (pain) medication per facility policy/procedure. The facility identified a census of 46 residents.Findings include:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 for which indicated severe cognitive decisions, is able to be understood and understands others, with hallucinations and delusions present along with resisting of cares. The MDS addressed the resident as substantial to maximal assistance on staff for all activities of daily living (toileting, oral and personal hygiene, and upper and lower body dressing) and pain described as frequent with intensity of a 2 out of a numeric scale of 1-10, poor prognosis with an opioid used within the last 7 days. The MDS included diagnosis of hypertension (a condition where blood force against the artery wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete resident clinical records for residents that had injuries of unknown origin for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Finding include:1. Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicating severely impaired cognitive decisions. Resident #2 could understand others and others usually understood them. They have no behavior, mood or delirium. Resident #2 required partial to moderate assistance with all aspects of daily living (dressing, personal hygiene, transfers, oral hygiene and positioning) and no falls documented and a use of an anti-coagulant (medications that prevent blood from clotting or stop existing clots from getting larger) medication used in the last 7 days. The MDS included diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, resident interviews, family interviews, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide dignity and respect when a nurse yelled at a resident about being outside of the facility and smoking on the sidewalk to 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 52 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment.On 12/11/25 at 10:05 AM Resident #1's daughter explained staff were not allowed to take her mother outside to smoke if they were employed at the facility. Resident #1's daughter stated there was a situation where an employee took her mother outside to smoke and a nurse went outside and yelled at the nurse and the CNA. Resident #1 daughter said her mother does not need permission to smoke on the sidewalk. Resident #1's daughter explained that the sidewalk was not owned by the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to assist residents with activities of daily living by not offering an opportunity to bathe for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1,and #3). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Finding include: 1. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #1 required moderate assistance with personal hygiene as well as needing total assistance with toileting hygiene. The MDS revealed diagnoses of arthritis, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and fibromyalgia. Interview 10/8/25 at 9:07 AM with Resident #1's family member revealed that Resident #1 has gone over a week without a bath. The family member further revealed that staff would ask when Resident #1 would like a bath, and then not return and mark Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents personal property was protected from loss or theft (Resident #14). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 indicating the resident was unable to perform the interview. The MDS further revealed diagnoses of progressive neurological conditions, cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and altered mental status. Interview 6/23/25 at 1:34 PM with Resident #14's family member revealed that Resident #14 was missing her wedding ring, and a birthstone ring. The family member then revealed that the facility was aware, and had not replaced the items. The family member further revealed that the rings were missing a couple months ago, and had notified the facility. Review of a facility provided document titled, Inventory of Personal Effects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review, staff interviews, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to implement the abuse and neglect policy by not completing background checks prior to staff employment for 1 out of 5 staff reviewed. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: A review of personnel file of Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), revealed the background check was completed 3/15/25 while the hired date was 10/8/24. Background check was not completed prior to hire date. In an interview with Staff H, Human Resources, on 06/24/25 02:29 pm, she stated during an internal audit they didn't locate a background check on Staff G, LPN and they completed one immediately on 3/15/25. During an interview with the DON on 6/24/25 at 2:35 pm, she confirmed that the facility failed to complete a required background check prior to hiring Staff G. Review of the facility provided policy titled Abuse and Neglect-Rehab/Skilled, Adult Day Services, Therapy & Rehab revised 4/7/2025 documented: The location will not knowingly employ or otherwise engage individuals who have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic health record review, resident interview, personnel file review, facility policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to investigate and report alleged violations related to mistreatment to officials including the State Survey Agency in an appropriate time frame for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #37 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS reflected Resident #37 diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke, hemiplegia or hemiparesis, and diabetes mellitus. The MDS further documented Resident #37 required total dependence of staff for performing toilet transfers and toileting hygiene. During interview on 6/24/25 at 11:16 am Resident #37 stated Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was providing cares to her before bed time on 2/5/25 and left her on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer 2 residents with a negative Level I result for the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who were later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements (Resident #16, #20). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #16 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) did not indicate a summary score. The MDS documented an admission date of 6/14/23. The MDS documented high-risk drug classes use and indicated Resident #16 was taking antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, and anticonvulsant medications. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented Resident #16 had the following diagnoses: psychological insomnia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide quality of nursing care by leaving a resident on a bed pan for an extensive period of time without a call light and not documenting the event for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #37 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS reflected Resident #37 diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke, hemiplegia or hemiparesis, and diabetes mellitus. The MDS further documented Resident #37 required total dependence on staff for performing toilet transfers and toileting hygiene. During an interview on 6/24/25 at 11:16 am Resident #37 stated Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was providing toileting hygiene on 2/5/25 and left her on the bed pan for 5 hours without a call light within reach.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #8's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #8 utilizes oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #8's EHR page titled, Physician's orders revealed an order for oxygen 1 Liters Per Minute (LPM) per nasal cannula at night while sleeping. Interview 6/23/25 at 1:02 PM with Resident #8 revealed that she just puts the oxygen on, and is unsure how often the tubing is changed. Observation 6/23/25 at 1:02 PM oxygen tubing was noted to be dated 4/16/25, and humidification bottle was noted to be dated 4/23/25. Interview 6/24/25 at 10:37 AM with Staff A RN (Registered Nurse) revealed she works here every other weekend with an agency, and oxygen tubing is to be changed weekly on Wednesdays. Staff A then revealed that there is a book that shows oxygen tubing is to be changed weekly on Wednesday nights. Review of an undated facility provided document titled, Master Schedule 6p-6a Center Nurse, revealed Wednesdays oxygen tubing and nebulizer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #9's MDS dated [DATE] revealed an admission date to the facility from a short-term general hospital stay 5/13/24. The MDS further revealed Resident #9 utilizes an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #9's EHR page titled, Clinical Physician ' s Orders revealed an order for coudé (a type of urinary catheter with a curved or bent tip) catheter for infection control with a date of 4/22/25. Observation 6/25/25 at 11:06 AM Staff D Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) brought Resident #9 into the bedroom to empty Resident #9's catheter drainage bag. Staff D then donned a gown and gloves with no hand hygiene. Staff D then obtained a urine graduate and placed it on a barrier on the floor. Staff D then drained the drainage bag without cleaning the drainage port of the drainage bag. After the drainage bag was emptied Staff D cleansed the drainage port with an alcohol wipe. Staff D then emptied the graduate. Staff D donned the gloves and gown with no hand hygiene and left the room. Interview 6/25/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility investigative file, staff interviews, resident interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards while administering medications for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #3, #4, #5, and #6). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 9/16/24 Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (MDS) score of 14. A BIMS score of 14 suggested no cognitive impairment. On 10/16/24 at 11:30 AM Resident #3 was sitting in her recliner in her room listening to an audiobook with her oxygen on via nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator. When asked if she felt her medications were being given as ordered she stated oh gosh yes, at least she thought. She added she has to be careful because she takes a lot of pills because of her heart failure. She had recent been to the hospital because she was short of breath and found to have a lot of fluid around her heart. She is feeling much…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, facility camera footage review, staff interviews, resident interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) was free from financial exploitation. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 7/30/24 documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. A BIMS score of 15 suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the following diagnoses for Resident #1: atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, depression, spinal stenosis, pulmonary hypertension, sleep apnea, proteinuria, long term use of insulin, and morbid obesity. The Care Plan had the following focus areas: Resident #1 was on diabetic therapy (initiated 7/11/24), the resident has diabetes mellitus (initiated 7/11/24), and had a potential nutritional problem related to the diagnoses of morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, and GERD (initiated 7/26/24). On 10/15/24 at 3:19 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary practices by failing to prevent cross-contamination while serving food. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: On 8/10/24 at 11:45 AM a continuous observation revealed, Staff I used tongs to move plastic wrap from pan with rolls then grabbed a roll with the same tongs and placed it on a resident's plate. She also used the same tongs to remove aluminum foil from a casserole pan. Staff I placed butter packets on residents' plates which directly touched the residents' food throughout meal service. At 12:04 PM, Staff I placed her right hand on the steam table counter and waited for a staff member to take the prepared plate from her left hand. She grabbed dedicated food scissors and cut a resident's meat into bite sized portions, placed the scissors on the steam table counter where her hand had been, picked up the scissors and cut two (2) more residents' meat into bite sized portions. At 12:10 PM, Staff I moved 2 pans from the left side of the steam table area and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, menu review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to properly prepare and serve the appropriate portions of pureed diets for 3 of 3 residents and minced and moist diets for 7 of 7 residents. The facility reported a census of 49. Findings include: The facility's lunch menu for 8/10/24 identified the following items to be served as part of the following planned textured diets. A) Pureed diet: 5 fluid ounces (fl oz) of ground/minced baked pork chop 4 fl oz of mashed potatoes 4 fl oz of pureed carrots (substitution for buttered summer squash) 1 each pureed bread slice 3 fl oz pureed peaches 8 fluid oz 2% milk 6 fl oz black coffee or tea B) Minced & Moist diet: 4 fluid ounces (fl oz) of pureed baked pork chop 4 fl oz of mashed potatoes 4 fl oz of pureed carrots (substitution for buttered summer squash) 1 each pureed bread slice 4 fl oz pureed peaches 8 fluid oz 2% milk 6 fl oz black coffee or tea Continuous observation of lunch preparation and service began on 8/10/24 at 10:20 AM. Staff I, Cook, stated she was preparing minced & moist diets for 9 servings. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly protect resident information from unauthorized access. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: On 8/09/24 at 3:45 PM, an observation revealed an open laptop screen with visible resident Electronic Health Record (EHR) information. A sheet was face-up on the cart with resident names, room numbers, blood glucose results, and insulin. At 3:47 PM, Staff D, Certified Nurse Aide, (CNA) stated staff usually did not leave the information visible and the screen is usually locked. At 3:50 PM, Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) stated she used the sheet as her cheat sheet so she would not forget the information. A policy titled Confidentiality revised 5/06/24 indicated individuals who have access to confidential information must ensure that such info4matinon, in whatever form it exists, is handled strictly in accordance with the policy and applicable legal, accreditation and regulatory requirements regarding safeguarding confidential information. On 8/11/24 at 2:08 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to provide proper hand hygiene during toileting and urinary catheter care for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1, Resident #35) observed. The facility also failed to perform hand hygiene between feeding two (2) residents. The facility reported a total census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/10/24 at 2:08 PM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) donned personal protective equipment (PPE) then assisted Resident #10 to the bathroom. Staff A lowered the resident's pants and incontinence brief then assisted the resident to sit on the toilet. Staff A removed and discarded soiled gloves, reached beneath her PPE gown, and retrieved hand sanitizer. Staff A performed hand hygiene then donned new gloves. After Resident #10 attempted to have a bowel movement, Staff A cleansed Resident # 10's buttock, pulled up his incontinence brief and pants, then sat the resident back on the toilet. Staff A removed and discarded soiled gloves. Staff A failed to perform hand hygiene, then donned new gloves.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-11 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a bed hold notice with the resident or resident's responsible person when residents transferred out of the facility for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #12). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 documented a discharge from the facility with return anticipated. Review of Resident #12's Progress Notes revealed the following information: a. On 7/14/24 Resident #12 admitted to the hospital. b. On 7/16/24 Resident #12 returned to the facility at 3:00 PM. Review of the Resident #12's census tab revealed the following information: a. 7/14/24 hospital start date b. 7/16/24 hospital end date The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 documented a reentry into the facility on 7/16/24. Review of Resident #12's clinical record revealed the facility lacked a bed hold notice for the hospital admission on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #20), who was diagnosed with new mental disorder diagnoses since admission to the facility. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive deficit. The MDS further revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, and psychotic disorder. Review of a facility provided document titled, The Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screen Outcome, dated 10/28/21 revealed a summary of findings indicating that Resident #20 did not show evidence of a serious mental illness or an intellectual or developmental disability (IDD) that appears to require PASRR intervention. The document provided the resident had a diagnosis of major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #5, #18, and #39). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #5 dated 7/16/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of cancer, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. It also revealed the resident was independent with eating, required setup assistance with oral hygiene, and moderate to maximum assistance with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). It further indicated the resident took antipsychotic and antidepressant medications within the last 7 days. The Clinical Physician Orders dated 8/10/24 included the following prescribed medications: a) Prozac Capsule 20 MG (FLUoxetine HCl) Give 20 mg by mouth in the morning related to major depressive disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to revise and update a care plan to include current transfer needs for 3 out of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #24, Resident #42, and Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings Included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 611/24 for Resident #24 documented diagnoses of pain in the left knee, muscle weakness and heart failure. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. The Progress Notes for Resident #24 showed the following: a. On 8/6/24 at 3:08 PM Resident #24 returned back to the facility after a procedure. Resident #24 reported having pain down her left leg. b. On 8/7/24 at 6:47 PM Resident #24 required a total lift to transfer to the wheelchair. In an interview on 8/9/24 at 1:46 PM, Resident #24 reported she received a Kyphoplasty procedure due to a compression fracture. Resident #4 reported she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #46) reviewed. The facility identified a census of 49 residents. Findings include: On 8/09/24 at 1:22 PM, an observation revealed Resident #46's oxygen flow meter was set to 4 liters per minute (LPM). The resident stated he required oxygen continuously. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #46 dated 7/02/24 indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart beat), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Heart Failure, and deep venous thrombosis (DVT - blood clot in deep veins). It revealed the resident was independent with eating and oral hygiene but required moderate to maximum assistance with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and received oxygen therapy upon admission and in the 14-day look-back period. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to identify target behaviors for psychotropic mediation use for 2 of 3 residents reviewed ( Resident #18 & #39). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #18 dated 7/23/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, concussion with loss of consciousness, cerebral infarction (stroke caused by blocked blood vessel to the brain), schizotypal disorder (personality disorder causing eccentric behavior and anxiety with close relationships), and metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by chemical imbalances in the blood). It revealed the resident required setup assistance with oral hygiene, supervision with eating, and was dependent with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). It further indicated the resident took antipsychotic, antidepressant, antianxiety, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, electronic health record (EHR) review, document review, resident interviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 2 of 5 resident reviewed (Resident #9 and #10). The facility reported a census of 52 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #9 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #9 as frequently incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel. On 5/14/24 at 1:52 PM Resident #9 stated she used her call light all the time and it was the only way she could get help. Resident #9 stated the staff frequently took longer than 15 minutes to respond to her call light. Resident #9 stated the staff needed more help. Resident #9 stated she turned the call light on that morning because she wanted to get out of bed. Resident #9 stated she waited and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when completing blood sugar monitoring for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4, #5, and #6). The facility reported a census of 52 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #4 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes Mellitus. Review of Resident #4's Clinical Physician Orders documented an order dated 10/10/23 for blood glucose monitoring 4 times a day. On 5/14/24 at 11:30 AM observed Resident #4 being pushed down the hall by Staff C into an unoccupied room. Staff C returned to the medication cart to retrieve the blood glucose machine and supplies. Staff C applied gloves without completing hand hygiene. Staff C entered the room and cleansed Resident #4's right hand index finger with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility schedule and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty for 8 hours a day, 7 days per week. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings included: The review of the facility's April 2023 nursing staff schedule lacked a RN on duty for 8 hours on the following days: a. 4/29/23 b. 4/30/23 The review of the facility's May 2023 nursing staff schedule lacked a RN on duty for 8 hours on the following days: a. 5/6/23 b. 5/20/23 c. 5/27/23 d. 5/28/23 On 6/1/23 at 6:45 AM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), reported the facility did not have eight hours of RN coverage on the weekends. On 6/1/23 at 12:14 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed that the facility lacked RN coverage on the dates listed. The DON acknowledged that she expected the facility to have 8 hours of RN coverage every day. The facility failed to provide a policy related to RN staffing requirements.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews and record review the facility failed to destroy and have an accurate account for discontinued narcotic medications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #25 and #101). Resident #25 and Resident #101 had their narcotic medications discontinued but the pills remained in the medication storage room and the medication cart. Findings include: 1. Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #25 required total dependence for transfers with help of 2 persons. The MDS indicated that Resident #25 received no opioids in the previous seven days of the lookback period. The Care Plan Focus revised 6/23/22 indicated that Resident #25 had chronic pain and discomfort related to a history of a fractured ankle and arthritis as evidenced by (AEB) her experiencing pain at times. The Interventions directed a Black Box Warning related to Tramadol due to a risk of medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to serve hot food to residents in their rooms. The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: On 5/31/23 at 11:34 AM observed the [NAME] check the temperature of the food on steam table within appropriate temperatures. After serving the dining room residents, the [NAME] prepared the room trays. On 5/31/23 at 12:43 PM observed 10 resident room trays and an extra tray placed in an enclosed food carrier. Someone immediately paged to notify the staff that South room trays were ready. On 5/31/23 at 12:46 PM witnessed three room trays ready for the [NAME] Hall. The staff paged that the [NAME] Hall trays were ready. Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), retrieved the [NAME] food cart and deliver the three trays. On 5/31/23 at 1:00 PM watched Staff A take the South cart from the kitchen. Staff A served the final room tray at 1:15 PM. Observed Staff A take the temperature of the extra tray. The temperature measured 111 degrees Fahrenheit. On 6/1/23 at 11:55 AM the Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's current code status was available for 1 out of 16 residents reviewed (Resident #201). Findings include: Resident #201's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of [DATE] from an acute hospital. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of renal disease, depression, arthritis, and right side back pain with sciatica. Review of the facility's Code Status Binder revealed a form titled Iowa Physician Orders Scope of Treatment (IPOST). The IPOST indicated that Resident #201 chose to have a Do Not Attempt to Resuscitate (DNR) status with comfort measures only. The IPOST documented comfort measures included the use of medications by any route, positioning, wound care, with other measures to relieve pain and suffering. Use of oxygen, suction, and manual treatment of airway obstruction as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to notify the family for a significant change in condition for 1 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #42) for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident #42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated that Resident #42 required extensive assistance of two persons with bed mobility and toilet use. The MDS listed that Resident #42 required total dependence of two persons with transfers and could not ambulate. The MDS identified that Resident #42 had an indwelling catheter. The MDS identified Resident #42 is at risk for developing pressure ulcer and that he had an unhealed stage 2 pressure ulcer during the seven-day lookback period. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), obstructive uropathy, end stage renal disease, and malnutrition. The Communication - Other note on 5/3/23 at 10:27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and chart review the facility failed to prevent the mishandling of a resident's narcotic medications for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #38). Findings include: Resident #38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed a re-admission date of 4/19/23 from another nursing home or swing bed. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognitive ability. The MDS listed that Resident #38 activities of daily living (ADL) only occurred once or twice in the lookback period. The Care Plan Focus revised 4/28/23 indicated that Resident #38 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related To hypertension (high blood pressure), a recent fall with a right hip fracture and repair, evidenced by the need for assistance with ADLs On 5/30/23 at 10:30 AM observed Resident #36 dressed and sitting in her recliner in her room. She said that she did not have any pain or concerns about her care. The Incident Note dated 4/12/23 at 7:59 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record review, hospital record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to investigate the sudden increase of pain for a resident who received scheduled pain medication for chronic pain who used a standing lift for transfers for one of one resident reveiwed (Resident #25). Despite reports that Resident #25 had difficulty standing with the standing mechanical lift, the facility did not investigate the concern. Without investigation of the concern, the staff continued to transfer Resident #25 with the standing mechanical lift. After a change in condition, the facility sent Resident #25 to the hospital who discovered a compression fracture. Findings include: Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated that Resident #25 required extensive assistance of two persons with bed mobility, dressing, and toilet use. In addition, she required total dependence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record review, facility policy review, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to revise and update the Care Plan to address the increased needs of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #25). Findings include: Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated that Resident #25 required extensive assistance of two persons with bed mobility, dressing, and toilet use. In addition, she required total dependence on two persons for transfers, and extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene. The assessment indicated that Resident #25 could not ambulate (walk) and needed one person to push her wheelchair. The MDS included diagnoses of cancer, heart failure, diabetes, depression, and a compression fracture of the spine (broken bone caused by weakness in the back). On 5/30/23 at 10:53 AM Resident #25 stated she fell out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #45 and #33). The facility failed to obtain weights as ordered by the physician for Resident #45. In addition, the facility failed to document the administration of medications, blood sugars, and bed time (HS) snacks for a diabetic resident. Findings include: 1. Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of prostate cancer, coronary artery disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), and malnutrition. The Order Details dated 4/4/23 directed to weigh Resident #45 three times a week and report a weight loss or gain of three to five pounds. Resident #45's April 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) included an order dated 4/5/23 to weight him three times per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, facility record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary interventions and care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent deterioration of a wound, heal a stage 2 pressure ulcer, and prevent the development of new ulcers for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #251 and #24). The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but has no bone, tendon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to complete dialysis assessments before and after outpatient hemodialysis treatments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #42). Finding include: Resident #42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated that Resident #42 required extensive assistance of two persons with bed mobility and toilet use. The MDS listed that Resident #42 required total dependence of two persons with transfers and could not ambulate. The MDS identified that Resident #42 had an indwelling catheter. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), obstructive uropathy, end stage renal disease, and malnutrition. Resident #42 received dialysis while a resident of the facility in the last 14 days in the lookback period. The Care Plan Focus revised 5/17/23 identified Resident #42 needed hemodialysis (the process of running…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a complete and accurate medical record for 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #45 and #251). After Resident #45 fell, their clinical record lacked a progress note related to the incident. During incontinence cares, the facility staff observed open areas to Resident #251. After reporting the concerns to the nurse, the clinical record lacked documentation of his open areas. Findings include: Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Resident #45 required limited assistance of one person with bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation in his room. The MDS indicated that he required extensive assistance of one person with toilet use. The MDS included diagnoses of prostate cancer, coronary artery disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), and malnutrition. The Incident Report dated 4/21/23 at 2:00 p.m. listed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to follow hand hygiene and gloving practices consistent with accepted standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #45) while providing catheter care. Findings include: Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Resident #45 required limited assistance of one person with bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation in his room. The MDS indicated that he required extensive assistance of one person with toilet use. The MDS listed that Resident #45 had an indwelling catheter. The MDS included diagnoses of prostate cancer, obstructive uropathy (obstructed urinary flow), and a urinary tract infection (UTI) in the last 30 days. The Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 91 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 91; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/14/2003 |
| BLAKESTAD, ALAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| GUDE, PAUL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| NIELSEN, PHIL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/06/2016 |
| SCHECHINGER, TAMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/20/2007 |
| NORBY, NICKLOS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/14/2020 |
| SHELL, STEPHEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165155. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.