No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunset Drive - a Prospera Community

1011 Boundary St NW, Mandan, ND 58554 · Non profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (701) 323-1411 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$42,226 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $42,226 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-15)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
102 Mandan Ave · (701) 667-5000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2500 Sunset Dr NW · (701) 530-3750 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3017 34th St NW · (701) 667-8500 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1020 Boundary St NW · (701) 663-8545

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.1%19.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.2%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.6%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.2%4.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.2%0.2%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%5.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.1%17.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%17.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%98.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.8%24.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.3%22.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.4%88.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%19.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.2%11.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.751.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.531.861.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.0%CMS range 32.7–49.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.0%CMS range 5.1–11.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge32.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.9–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
64.5%
Total nursing turnover
67.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 121.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-15)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

69 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from accident hazards during 2 of 2 severe weather events (06/20/25 and 06/27/25). Failure to ensure facility staff took appropriate action/precautions to protect residents during severe weather events placed all residents at risk for physical and emotional harm. During an on-site complaint survey, the survey team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) on 07/24/25 and determined an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 06/20/25. The facility failed to implement their emergency plan when tornado warnings were issued which placed residents at risk for injury.* 07/24/25 at 5:24 p.m., the survey team notified the acting administrator (#1) and the director of nursing (DON) (#2) of the IJ situation, provided the IJ template, and requested the facility's removal plan for the IJ.* 07/25/25 at 1:41 p.m., the State Agency (SA) reviewed and accepted the removal plan.* 07/28/25 at 3:11 p.m., the survey team verified the implementation of the removal plan as of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI) and investigation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision and/or assistance to prevent an accident for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #55) injured during a facility van transport. Failure to ensure the power control to the motorized scooter (wheelchair) is turned off during transport resulted in an injury to Resident #55's foot and placed all residents with motorized wheelchairs at risk for injury during transports. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident. Findings include: The surveyor determined a deficient practice existed on 02/28/25. The facility implemented and completed corrective action on 03/05/25. Review of Resident #55's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, immobility, and right foot fracture. The care plan stated, . AMBULATION:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, resident and family interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 4 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #2, #3, #8. and #17) and 9 supplemental residents (Resident #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, and #39) observed during survey. Failure to maintain a clean, comfortable, and sanitary environment does not provide a homelike environment for residents and fails to promote dignity. Review of the facility policy titled Environmental Cleaning Principles occurred on 05/28/26. This undated policy, stated, . Environmental cleaning plays an important role in an infection control program. the spread of infections from contaminated surfaces is significant and supports the need for good procedures and practices related to cleaning and disinfecting of surfaces. There should be an emphasis of frequently cleaning and disinfection [sic] high touch areas . Observations on all days of survey showed the followed: * 05/26/26 at 2:36 p.m., Resident #35's floor showed visible food debris, dust…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and resident representative interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a discharge for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #19) who left the facility and did not return. Failure to notify a resident's representative of a discharge does not allow the representative to make informed decisions regarding the resident's care.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Notification of Change- R/S, LTC [rehab/skilled and Long Term Care] occurred on 05/28/26. This policy, dated 12/12/25, stated, . A facility must immediately inform . the resident representative(s) when there is: . A decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility . Review of Resident #19's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified family member #B as the resident's guardian over the person, financial and property, effective 03/19/26.Review of Resident #19's progress notes identified the following:*03/28/2026 at 9:47 p.m., Resident left AMA [against medical advice].*03/28/26 at 9:55 p.m., Resident not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI), facility policy review, staff interview, and family interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall for 1 of 1 closed resident record (Resident #20) reviewed who reported a fall and injury. Failure to thoroughly investigate Resident #20's reported fall from a mechanical lift and potential causes of a compression fracture, placed Resident #20 and all residents at risk for possible neglect and/or injury.Findings include: Review of the facility policy title Fall Prevention And Management- Rehab/Skilled, Therapy & Rehab occurred on 05/28/26. This policy, dated 03/31/26, stated, . Procedure . Notify the physician and resident representative of the incident. If resident is stable, call available employees to the scene of the fall and begin the investigation . Review of the FRI, submitted to the state survey agency (SSA) on 04/28/26, identified a moderate injury and compression to the T8 (thoracic vertebrae number 8). The report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly utilize assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents and/or injury for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) observed without wheelchair footrests. Failure to use the wheelchair footrests placed the resident at risk for falls and/or injury. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Wheelchair, Use of, LTC, occurred on 05/28/26. This policy, revised 09/30/25, stated, . To provide mobility for the non-ambulatory resident with safety and comfort. Lower foot rests and place resident's feet on foot rests . Assist resident to the area of the facility desired. Observation on 05/27/26 at 9:10 a.m., an unidentified certified nurse aide (CNA) approached Resident #2, who was seated in his wheelchair. The CNA brought Resident #2 back to his room to assist with dressing. During the transport, the resident's legs/feet bounced along the floor. The CNA failed to place the footrests on the wheelchair and failed to cue the resident to raise his legs/feet.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #18) who received oxygen therapy. Failure to clarify physician's orders regarding oxygen administration and failure to adequately monitor respiratory status have contributed to Resident #'s compromised respiratory status and subsequent hospitalization.Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, Safety, Mask Types occurred on 05/28/26. This policy, revised 07/30/25, stated, Oxygen administration is carried out only with a medical provider order. Oxygen Cylinder. Verify physician order. Assess resident for at least first 15 to 30 minutes after beginning therapy and at regular intervals depending on resident's condition. Review of Resident #18's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified an admission from the hospital to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #8 and #21) on enhanced barrier precautions and observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to personal care and use of shared equipment has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Standard, Enhanced Barrier, and Transmission-Based Precautions .' occurred on 05/28/26. This policy, dated 04/30/26, stated, . Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) . Enhanced barrier precautions expand the use of personal protective equipment beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of multidrug-resistant (MDROs) to staff hands and clothing. -Review of Resident #21's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The care plan stated, . EBP. The resident requires Enhance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI) investigation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and/or monitoring to prevent elopements from the facility for 1 of 1 closed resident record reviewed (Resident #1). Failure to provide adequate supervision and monitoring and respond to door alarms immediately resulted in Resident #1's elopement from the facility and may result accidents, such as hit by a car, and injury from prolonged exposure to cold temperatures. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the elopement. Findings include:Review of the initial FRI report stated, . 12/24/25 at 4:35 p.m. Resident was found at the gas station across the street. Resident was not injured and came back to the facility once found. Resident on 15-minute checks and wander guard placed on resident.Review of the final FRI investigation stated, 12/24/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility reported incidents (FRI) and investigations, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #4) who displayed physical behaviors towards other residents. Failure to protect residents from abuse resulted in physical abuse to Resident #1 and #3 and placed all residents at risk for injury and mental and emotional distress. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incidents.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect occurred on 12/10/25. This policy, revised 04/07/25, stated, . The resident/client has the right to be free from abuse . resident/client must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to . other residents/clients . 1. The surveyor determined a deficient practice existed on 11/14/25 when Resident #2 hot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 2 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #3) observed during mealtime. Failure to follow physician orders for dietary modifications may result in adverse consequences such as choking or aspiration for all residents.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled “Physician/Practitioner Orders” occurred on 08/25/25. This policy, dated 04/06/25, stated, “. Physician/Practitioner orders are a critical component to providing quality care to residents. Accurate processing of physician/practitioner orders is important.” Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing, Concepts, Process and Practice, 11th Edition eText, 2021, Pearson, Boston, Massachusetts, page 63, stated, Nurses are expected to analyze procedures . ordered by the physician or primary care provider. If the order is neither ambiguous nor apparently erroneous, the nurse is responsible for carrying it out. - Review of Resident #1's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain oral hygiene for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) dependent on staff for oral cares. Failure to provide oral care for a dependent resident may result in poor hygiene, increased oral/dental problems, and potential for adverse health effects. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living occurred on 07/24/25. This policy, dated December 2024, stated, . Any resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living [ADL's] will receive necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene . ADLs are necessary tasks conducted in the normal course of a resident's daily life . included in these are the following: . Daily hygiene/grooming . oral care.-Review of Resident #1's medical record occurred on all days of survey. A Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 57 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of facility assessment, review of call light logs, and confidential staff interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff and related services necessary to meet the needs for 5 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) who required staff assistance. Failure to provide sufficient nursing staff may result in residents experiencing unmet needs, poor hygiene, incontinence, and skin issues and may negatively affect the residents' mental, physical and psychosocial well-being.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Services Staff occurred on 07/28/25. This policy, dated October 2024, stated, . The facility must have sufficient nursing staff . to ensure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident .Review of the Facility Assessment occurred on 07/28/25. The assessment stated, . Staffing needs are met by providing adequate staff to each of the units and monitored by Nursing Administration and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for timely medication administration for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #1, # 2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7). Failure to administer medications in a timely manner may cause adverse effects for the residents. Findings include:The facility failed to provide a policy regarding timely medication administration.Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing, Concepts, Process and Practice, 11th Edition eText, 2021, Pearson, Boston, Massachusetts, page 834-835, stated, . administer the medication . at the correct time. Table 35.8 . Process of Administering Medications. NON-TIME-CRITICAL MEDICATIONS . Medications prescribed . within 1 hour before or after the scheduled time. - Review of Resident #1's medication administration record (MAR), dated May 2025 showed staff administered medications over one hour late on ten occasions.- Review of Resident #2's MAR dated May 2025 showed staff administered medications over one hour late on seven occasions.- Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the code level status accurately reflected the resident's wishes for 5 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #19, #80, #108, #111, and #119) reviewed for advance directives. Failure to ensure the medical record and other forms of communication accurately reflected the resident's code status limited the facility's ability to communicate to direct care staff and emergency personnel the resident's choice in the event of a medical emergency. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Advance Directive including Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Automated External Defibrillator (AED) occurred on [DATE]. This policy, dated, [DATE], stated, . To define a process to make resident decisions known. Residents have the right to formulate advance directives. Review of Resident #19's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified palliative care (comfort care). Physician's orders, dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #14, #67, #69, and #99) and 2 supplemental residents (Resident #70 and #284). Failure to maintain a safe, clean, and sanitary environment may lead to injury from unsafe equipment, does not provide a homelike living area for residents, and does not promote quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Preventative Maintenance-Affordable Housing occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, dated November 2024, stated, . provide a safe environment for our residents . a preventative maintenance program will be implemented to promote the maintenance of buildings and equipment in a state of good repair and condition and free from safety hazards. - Observations on 05/12/25 identified the following: *10:20 a.m., A strong urine odor in Resident # 99's room. *11:50 a.m., Resident #284's bed stripped of all linens. *10:22 a.m., A strong urine odor and a sticky bathroom floor in Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect the residents' current status for 6 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #2, #27, #55, #66, #67, and #119) and 1 supplemental resident (#59). Failure to update care plans limited the staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plan-R/S, LTC, Therapy & Rehab occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, dated December 2024, stated, Each resident will have an individualized, person-centered, comprehensive plan of care . The care plan will emphasize the care and development of the whole person ensuring that the resident will receive appropriate care and services. - Review of Residents #2, #27, #55, #59, #66, #67, and #119 medical records occurred on all days of survey and identified diagnoses of diabetes, and physician's orders for insulin. These residents' care plans lacked signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) to be monitored and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 4 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #2, #29, #55, and #76) and 2 supplemental residents (Resident #88 and #120) who required staff assistance for bathing. Failure to aid residents who cannot perform the bathing and nail care task independently may result in poor hygiene, skin related issues, and decreased self-esteem. Findings include: The facility failed to provide a policy. - Random observations of Resident #2 on all days of survey showed Resident #2's fingernails extended approximately one fourth inch beyond the finger with dark debris under the nails. Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The current care plan stated, . The resident has an ADL [activities of daily living] self care performance deficit . BATHING: Resident requires assist x 1 [times one staff] will receive a minimum of one bed bath/shower/bath per week . PERSONAL HYGIENE: Resident requires assist x 2 [times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident council meeting minutes, confidential resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and related services are available at all times to meet the residents' needs for 7 of 27 confidential residents (Resident A, B, E, H, I, J, and K) who required staff assistance. Failure to provide sufficient staffing does not promote each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and/or provide a safe environment for the residents. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, dated 01/13/25 through 04/24/25 identified the following: * 02/23/25, . Staff turning off call lights without meeting the residents needs continue to be addressed as well as call light times. * 02/27/25, . There were several complaints about CNAs [certified nurse aides] turning off lights and not coming back. Residents feel that the call light times are lengthy nursing will look into this issue and report back. * 03/31/25, . There were several complaints about CNAs turning off lights and not coming back.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of resident council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve foods at palatable temperatures in 4 of 4 units (Sunset, Edgewater, Grandview, and [NAME]). Failure to serve foods at a temperature acceptable to residents may result in decreased intake, weight loss, and inadequate nutrition. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Temperature Monitoring - Food and Nutrition Services occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, revised 12/16/24, stated, . Proper serving temperature - a temperature that is . appetizing to the resident . this is the temperature when the food reaches the resident. Test tray monitoring occurs as part of quality assurance monitoring to ensure temperatures are acceptable when the location uses room trays or satellite dining rooms. Test tray is checked after all residents have been served. Confidential resident interviews conducted during the survey identified the following: * Resident A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 9 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #2, #3, #6, #19, #26, #29, #67, #107, and #281) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), catheter care, dressing changes, glove use, hand hygiene, and disinfecting of shared equipment has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Catheter: Care, Insertion & [and] Removal, Drainage Bags, Irrigation, Specimen occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, revised 04/05/25, stated, . Connecting Leg Bag. Following insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter, it is recommended to maintain a closed urinary drainage system. 4. Swab attachment site of catheter with alcohol pad. 5. clamp catheter. 6. After wiping cap with alcohol pad, disconnect catheter and drainage tubing and do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an assessment and obtain a physician's order for self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #108) observed with medications at the bedside. Failure to evaluate the resident's ability to safely self-administer medications may result in medication errors and/or harm to the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Self-Administration of Medication occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, revised 10/29/24, stated, . Complete the Resident Self-Administration of Medications UDA [user defined assessment] to determine if the resident can safely administer medications . A physician's order must be obtained prior to the resident self-administering medications. Review of Resident #108's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The record lacked a facility assessment and physician's order for self-administration of medications. Observation on 05/12/25 at 10:52 a.m. identified two paper medication cups, one cup held…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to promote care in a manner that maintained or enhanced residents' dignity for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #2) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #32) who required assistance with personal hygiene. Failure to ensure the residents face and positioning devices are clean, and doors are closed during toileting does not promote the resident's mental well-being or dignity. Findings include: - Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The current care plan identified assistance required for dressing, repositioning, and personal hygiene. Observations of Resident #2 showed the following: * 05/12/25 at 11:21 a.m., seated in a wheelchair in the day room and a chest vest positioning device soiled with debris. * 05/13/25 at 8:04 a.m., seated in a wheelchair at the dining table and a chest vest positioning device soiled with debris. * 05/14/25 at 7:44 a.m., seated in a wheelchair at the dining table with head down, a chest vest positioning device in place soiled with debris. *…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs regarding call lights for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2). Failure to place call lights within reach may result in an inability to call for help, discomfort, increased falls, and/or incontinence.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Call Light occurred on 07/09/25. This policy, dated 07/29/24, stated, PURPOSE: To ensure resident always has a method of calling for assistance . PROCEDURE . When leaving the room, place call light within easy reach of resident. Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The care plan stated, . Resident is legally blind, describe location of items at bedside. non-ambulatory . Observations on 07/07/25 at 11:37 a.m. and 07/08/25 at 11:15 a.m. showed Resident #2 in bed and the call light placed on a chair located at the foot of the bed. When asked about the call light, Resident #2 stated, Every time they [facility staff] work with me, they move it there [the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice of room change for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed with a recent room change. Failure to provide the resident and/or resident's representative a written explanation of why a move is required prevents the resident and/or representative from making informed decisions significant to the resident's care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Room/Roommate Change occurred on 07/09/25. This policy, dated 12/12/24, stated, . The resident has the right to receive written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room . location is changed. Social services or a designated employee will discuss any proposed change in room with the resident and/or resident representative. The resident and/or representative must be given a reason for the move and provided the opportunity to see the new location and ask questions about the move. Review of Resident #1's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified a room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to honor resident choices for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #55 and #99) who had personal food items stored in the resident fridge. Failure to honor the resident's choice of personal food items at meals or when requested does not respect their autonomy or right to determine what is significant to their care and well-being. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Safe Food Handling of Personal Food, Outside Food-Food and Nutrition occurred on 05/16/25. This policy, dated 05/13/24, stated, . Employees assist residents in accessing and consuming personal food if the resident is unable to do so on his or her own. Personal food is stored separate from the location's food. Review of a document in the facility admission packet titled Outside Food, occurred on 05/14/25. This undated document stated, Personal fridges are not allowed in individual rooms. Refrigerated food in small amounts can be stored in resident fridge in the main kitchen. All perishable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility reported incident (FRI), review of facility investigative reports, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #47 and #76) with impaired cognition who displayed sexual behaviors towards other residents. Failure to protect residents from sexual abuse may result in fear, anxiety, mental anguish, and physical injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, dated 07/22/24, stated, . PURPOSE: To ensure . an effective system in place that . prevents mistreatment, neglect, exploitation and abuse of resident . The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect . and exploitation. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including . other residents . Review of a FRI, dated 03/03/25, indicated a medication aide (MA) prepared medications near the dining room and observed Residents #47 and #76 seated at opposite…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report incidents of potential abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #47 and #76) who displayed sexual behaviors towards other residents. Failure to report events of potential sexual abuse to the SSA placed Resident's #47 and #76 and all other residents at risk for possible abuse, mental and emotional distress, and/or physical injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, dated 07/22/24, stated, . Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including . other residents . Results of all investigations will be reported . to the state survey and certification agency within five working days of the incident, or sooner as designated by state law . - Review of Resident #47' medical record occurred on all days of survey. A progress note, dated 04/23/25 at 9:20 a.m., stated . [Resident #47] and I discussed an incident that was reported the night of 4/20 [2025]. When asked if the incident happened,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide the resident or their representative and the State Long Term Care Ombudsman a written notice of transfer and bed-hold notice for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #37) reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to provide a notice of transfer and a bed-hold notice does not allow the resident and/or their representative to make informed decisions regarding their rights, or inform the Ombudsman of the transfer. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Discharge And Transfer occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, dated 03/28/25, stated, . Before a location transfers . the location must: 1. Notify the resident and the resident's representative of the transfer . in writing . the location must send a copy . to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman . Review of the facility policy titled Bed-Hold occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, dated 12/19/24, stated, . PURPOSE: To ensure that the resident/resident representative is made aware of the facility's bed hold and reserve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, and review of the federal database for Long-Term Care Survey, the facility failed to ensure timely electronic data submission of required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #281). Failure to follow the MDS data submission specifications does not meet the intended regulatory requirements. Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.19), page 2-33 and 2-34, stated, Non-Comprehensive assessments and Entry and Discharge Reporting Discharge Assessment - Return Anticipated . The MDS must be transmitted . electronically no later than 14 calendar days after the MDS completion date . Page 2-38 stated, Entry Tracking Records . Must be submitted no later than the 14th calendar day after the entry . Page 5-1 stated, . All Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified nursing homes . must transmit required MDS data records to CMS'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed standards of practice for 1 of 1 supplemental resident (Resident #284) observed during insulin preparation. Failure to properly prime insulin pens may result in the resident receiving an inaccurate dose of insulin. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication: Insulin Administration, Insulin Pens, Insulin Pumps occurred on 05/14/25. This policy, dated 09/05/24, stated, . Insulin Pen: . Turn the dosage knob to '2' units to prime the pen. Observation on 05/13/25 at 12:16 p.m. showed a facility nurse (#10) prepare an insulin pen for Resident #284. After placing a new cap on the pen, the nurse (#10) dialed the insulin pen to the prescribed dose without priming the pen. When asked if she had primed the pen, the facility nurse (#10) stated she never primes an insulin pen. During an interview on 05/13/24 at 12:20 p.m., an administrative nurse (#2) confirmed staff should prime insulin pens before dialing to the prescribed insulin dose. 2. Based on record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful activities designed to meet the interests and preferences for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #76) and 1 confidential resident (Resident I). Failure to provide meaningful activities for residents limits their ability to reach their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activity Services Calendar occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, dated 12/30/24, stated, . The facility must provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities . to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident . The activity services calendar of events will be based on resident interests and abilities as well as the care plan goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #6) reviewed for limited range of motion received restorative services as per care plan. Failure to consistently provide restorative nursing/therapy services may adversely affect the resident's ability to maintain their range of motion (ROM). Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnosis included Parkinsons's disease and abnormal posture. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified impairment to upper and lower extremities (arms and legs) bilaterally. The current care plan stated, . Resident has a need for restorative intervention R/T [related to] contractures from Parkinsons. Arm and leg exercises both sides. Range of motion [ROM] exercises provided weekly or bath/shower days as available. Stuffed animal to be placed in hands for contractures. Observation of Resident #6 occurred on all days of survey and identified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and resident interview, the facility failed develop an effective pain management regimen and schedule routine pain medications to meet residents' needs for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #67) reviewed for pain management. Failure to develop and implement an acceptable and manageable pain management plan resulted in unresolved pain and discomfort. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pain Management occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, dated 01/31/25, stated, . The licensed nurse will review response to medication intervention and work closely with the physician to assist in the individualized pain management plan. The nurses working directly with residents must continually monitor and observe the resident for success of the pain management plan and report to the nurse manager and prescriber as necessary to keep the resident comfortable. a pain management plan should be person centered . The interdisciplinary team and nurses must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #67) with a medication not held prior to scheduled surgery. Failure to accurately transcribe and follow physician's orders may result in adverse health consequences and/or delayed treatment for the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Errors occurred on 05/15/25. This policy, dated 04/08/25, stated, Definitions . Significant Medication Error: One which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes his or her health and safety . Medication Error Types . Transcription Error: Inaccurate transcription of an order. Review of Resident #67's medical record occurred on all days of survey. A physician's order, dated 05/09/25, stated, preop [preoperative {before surgery}] instructions for surgery on 5/16/25. hold . ASA [aspirin] . 5 days before surgery. Review of Resident #67's May 2025 medication administration record (MAR) identified the facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to store and serve food properly in 1 of 4 units (Grandview) observed during/after meal service. Failure to ensure food is stored at proper temperatures and served in a sanitary manner may result in foodborne illness to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Temperature Monitoring occurred on 05/14/25. This policy, dated 12/16/24, stated, . Proper holding temperature - Temperature required for food safety (cold food < [less than] 41 degrees Fahrenheit [F].) - Observation on 05/14/25 at 3:09 p.m. in the Grandview Unit Kitchenette showed the following items in a cold well (open refrigerated area built into the counter) * A half gallon of milk measured 46.8 degrees F * A side salad containing lettuce, egg, and tomato * Containers of grape, cranberry and prune juice. The cranberry juice measured 46.8 degrees F. The cold well had approximately one half inch of frost build up on all four of the inner sides. A facility refrigerator thermometer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse from 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) who displayed sexual behaviors towards other residents. Failure to protect residents from sexual abuse may result in fear, anxiety, mental anguish, and physical injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect - Rehab/Skilled occurred on 01/08/25. This policy, revised 07/22/24, stated, . Purpose . To ensure that residents are not subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to . other residents . To ensure that all identified incidents of alleged or suspected abuse/neglect . are promptly reported and investigated. -Review of Resident #1's medical record occurred on 01/08/25. Diagnoses included dementia. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified mild cognitive impairment. The care plan, dated 01/05/25, stated, The resident has a behavior symptom R/T…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to report incidents of resident-to-resident abuse to the administrator and State Survey Agency (SSA) for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) who exhibited sexual behaviors. Failure to report incidents of sexual abuse may result in unwanted physical and/or sexual contact and may cause all residents to experience fear, anxiety, and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect - Rehab/Skilled occurred on 01/08/25. This policy, revised 07/22/24, stated, . Purpose . To ensure that residents are not subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to . other residents . To ensure that all identified incidents of alleged or suspected abuse/neglect . are promptly reported and investigated. -Review of Resident #1's medical record occurred on 01/08/25. Diagnoses included dementia. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 11/05/24, identified mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a change in condition for 1 of 2 closed record residents (Resident #6) reviewed. Failure to notify the physician of increased abdominal pain, tenderness, rigidity, and vomiting may have prevented the physician from altering the treatment/care provided to the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Notification of Change occurred on November 5, 2024. This policy, dated 12/04/23, stated, . A facility must immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is: . 2. A significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status. 3. A need to alter treatment significantly - a need to discontinue or change an existing form of treatment or to commence a new form of treatment. Review of Resident #6's medical record occurred on November 5,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #2) with an indwelling suprapubic catheter observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Standard and Transmission Based Precautions, All Service Lines occurred on 10/02/24. This policy, revised 04/02/24, stated, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) . Enhanced barrier precautions expand the use of PPE (personal protective equipment) beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated and refer to use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of multidrug-resistant organisms [MRDOs] to staff hands and clothing. Enhanced barrier precautions are needed for residents with . Indwelling Medical devices (central lines,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs regarding call lights for 5 of 10 sampled residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6). Failure to place call lights within a resident's reach may result in an inability to call for help, increased falls, discomfort and/or incontinence. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Call Lights occurred on 07/31/24. This policy, dated 07/29/24, stated, . PURPOSE To ensure resident always has a method of calling for assistance . PROCEDURE . When leaving the room, place call light within easy reach of the resident. Random observations on 07/30/24 showed the following: * At 3:25 p.m. and 6:15 p.m., Resident #3 rested in bed with the call light located on the overbed table and out of reach. * At 3:25 p.m., Resident #4 asleep in bed. The call light hung from the bottom rung of the bed rail and out of reach. * At 3:26 p.m. and 6:16 p.m., Resident #5 asleep in bed with the call light located on the bedside table out of reach. * At 3:26 p.m. and 6:18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the North Dakota Long Term Care Ombudsman Program Guide to Resident Rights, and resident interview, the facility failed to provide care for 2 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) in a manner that promotes, maintains, or enhances their quality of life. Failure to cover a urinary catheter bag (Resident #1) and failure to provide care in a dignified manner (Resident #2) does not preserve the resident's personal dignity and/or enhance their quality of life and has the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The North Dakota Long Term Care Ombudsman Program's Guide to Resident Rights, updated 03/21/23, page 16, stated, . The facility must treat you courteously, fairly and with dignity. - Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on all days of survey and identified assistance of one to two staff for toileting and total assistance with dressing. Observation on 07/30/24 at 3:59 p.m. showed a certified nurse aide (CNA) (#4) entered Resident #2's room to provide incontinence cares. The CNA removed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, professional reference review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #2) observed for toileting. Failure to provide toileting assistance as care planned may result in a loss of dignity and placed the resident at risk for skin breakdown, poor grooming/hygiene, decreased self-esteem, and urinary tract infections. Findings include: Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing: Concepts, Process and Practice, 11th Edition eText, 2021, Pearson, Boston, Massachusetts, page 892, stated, Fecal and Urinary Incontinence: Moisture from incontinence promotes skin maceration [tissue softened by prolonged wetting or soaking] and makes the epidermis [skin] more easily eroded and susceptible to injury. Page 1221 stated, . scheduled toileting, attempts to keep clients dry by having them void at regular intervals, such as every 2 to 4 hours. The goal is to keep the client dry . Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The care plan stated, .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of the facility call light logs, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to promptly respond to residents' call lights for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #8) observed with prolonged call light wait times. Failure to promptly respond to calls for assistance may result in falls and residents experiencing unmet needs and may negatively affect the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Call Light occurred on 07/31/24. This policy, dated 07/29/24, stated, . PURPOSE . To promptly answer resident's call light. PROCEDURE . When resident's call light is observed/heard, go to resident's room promptly. Respond to request as soon as possible. Turn call light off and inquire about resident's request. - Review of Resident #8's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The care plan stated, . The resident has an ADL [activities of daily living] self care performance deficit R/T [related to] deconditioning E/B [evidenced by]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #2, #9, and #10) observed receiving toileting assistance. Failure to follow infection control practices regarding hand hygiene during cares has the potential for transmission of communicable diseases and infections to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene occurred on 07/31/24. This policy, dated 03/29/22, stated, . All employees in patient care areas . will adhere to the 4 Moments of Hand Hygiene. 1. Entering room [ROOM NUMBER]. Before Clean Task 3. After Bodily Fluid/Glove Removal 4. Exiting Room . Hand hygiene should be performed after glove removal. Observations on 07/30/24 showed the following: * At 4:15 p.m., two certified nurse aides (CNAs) (#3 and #4) provided toileting cares to Resident #2 while in bed. Both CNAs donned gloves and removed the resident's soiled brief. The one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility reported incident (FRI), review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free of physical restraints imposed for purposes of convenience for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for restraints. Failure to use a restraint only if required to treat a resident's medical symptoms placed Resident #1 at risk for an unnecessary restraint and injury. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately after learning of the incident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Restraints occurred on 06/19/24. This policy, dated 12/05/23, stated, . Policy: Residents are free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Physical Restraints - Any . material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policies, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food is prepared and stored in a clean and sanitary manner in 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 4 kitchenettes (Unit 2). Failure to ensure cleanliness of food preparation and storage areas has the potential to result in a foodborne illness to residents, visitors, and staff. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Food -Supply Storage occurred on 05/02/24. This policy, dated 05/11/23, stated, . Procedure. 9. Use By. dates are checked on a regular basis; foods/fluids that have expired. for use are discarded. Review of the policy titled, Date Marking occurred on 05/02/24. This policy, dated 04/03/24, stated, . Procedure. 1. b. Observe for USE by date or USE or FREEZE by date. This is an expiration date. d. If the items are removed from the original container/package, individual items are labeled and dated with date. 2. a. Ensure that. foods opened. are clearly date-marked for: 1) The date/time the original container is opened. 3. a.Foods prepared. and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THIS IS A REPEAT DEFICIENCY FROM THE SURVEY COMPLETED ON 05/11/23. Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 7 of 26 sampled residents (Resident #7, #23, #40, #58, #73, #80, and #83) observed during cares. Failure to follow infection control standards with use of personal protective equipment (PPE), during toileting, and colostomy care has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Personal Protective Equipment PPE including Putting on/Taking off, All Service Lines - Enterprise occurred on 05/02/24. This policy, revised 12/04/23, stated, Sequence for donning and Removing Personal Protective Equipment - CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]. The type of PPE used will vary based on the level of precautions required, such as standard and contact, droplet or airborne infection isolation precautions.1. Gown. Fasten in back of neck and waist. 2. Mask or Respirator [N95 mask]. Secure ties. Fit flexable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #67) reviewed who experienced low blood sugars. Failure to notify the physician of blood sugar results below the ordered parameters may result in complications to the resident and prevent the physician from evaluating/prescribing an appropriate treatment plan. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Notification of Change occurred on 05/02/24. This policy, revised 12/04/23, stated, . A facility must immediately . consult with the resident's physician . when there is . A significant change in the resident's physical . status . Review of Resident #67's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes. Medications included, . NovoLOG [Insulin] . Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 60 = call [sic] provider . The current care plan stated, . MEDICATIONS AND BLOOD SUGAR MONITORING PER ORDER TIMING AND DOSING MAY VERY DUE TO RESIDENT BRITTLE DIABETIC STATUS NOTFIY…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess the use of a wheelchair lap belt as a possible restraint for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #52) observed with a wheelchair lap belt. Failure to assess the wheelchair lap belt as a possible restraint, monitor the use, and evaluate the need for continued use, placed Resident #52 at risk for an unnecessary restraint and injury related to its use. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Restraints occurred on 05/02/24. This policy, revised 12/05/23, stated, . Anytime a device, material or equipment is attached or placed adjacent to the resident's body, a determination will be made by a licensed nurse as to whether it is or could be a restraint . and a Physical Device and/or Restraint Evaluation and review is completed. There will be documentation in the medical record of the resident's response to . and ongoing re-evaluation of the need for the restraint. Observation on 04/30/24 at 11:15 a.m., showed Resident #52 seated in a wheelchair with a lap belt in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 3 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #12, #25, and #40). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents. Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility RAI Manual, revised October 2023, page N-7, stated, . N0415: High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication (cont.) . N0415D 1. Hypnotic: Check if a hypnotic medication was taken by the resident at any time during the 7-day look-back period . - Review of Resident #12's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed Item N0415D coded as the resident received a hypnotic medication within the 7-day look back period. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observation, record review, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #316) with intravenous (IV) administrations. Failure of staff to label, date, and time the IV solution bags may result in medication errors and adverse reactions. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication: Intravenous Administration occurred on 05/02/24. This policy, dated 03/29/24, stated, . All IV solution containers will be labeled with the resident's name . time of preparation . Review of Resident #316's medical record occurred on all days of survey. A current physician's order stated, Administer LR [lactated ringers] 100 cc [cubic centimeters]/hr [hour] for 10 hours daily (Total: 1000 cc per 24 hrs [hours]). Observation from 04/29/24 to 04/30/24 showed an IV solution bag of lactated ringer's (an electrolyte solution) not labeled with the resident's name, date, and time. During an interview on 05/02/24 at 2:45 p.m., an administrative nurse (#1) confirmed staff did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #417) observed during a PICC [peripherally inserted central catheter] line dressing change. Failure to follow physician's orders regarding dressing changes may result in delayed treatment and the resident experiencing adverse consequences. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Line occurred on 05/02/24. This policy, revised 04/01/24, stated, . PROCEDURE: assess the catheter insertion site through the transparent semi-permeable dressing . assess for redness, swelling, drainage . DRESSING CHANGE: REMOVE THE OLD DRESSING . assess the site and skin for signs of inflammation, infection (redness, tenderness, drainage . and assess the arm for pain, warmth, swelling .). Using sterile technique . cleanse the area thoroughly with a chlorhexidine (antiseptic) . before redressing the site, use a sterile tape measure to measure the external length of the catheter from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to minimize the potential for the worsening of pressure ulcers for 1 of 4 sampled resident (Resident #98) with pressure ulcers. Failure to consistently implement dressings and pressure relief interventions on pressure ulcer may result in the worsening of Resident #98's current foot/heel pressure ulcer or the development of new pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #98's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified Resident #98 at risk of pressure ulcers had one unhealed stage 3 pressure ulcer. A physician's order, dated 04/23/24, stated, Left heel derma saver boot or float on pillow at all times, every day and night shift for skin integrity. A physician's order, dated 04/25/24, stated, Left heel: Foam border pressure dressing (Mepilex, or equivalent) for prevention on every day shift, change 2 x/week [twice a week] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS IS A REPEAT DEFICIENCY FROM THE SURVEY COMPLETED ON 05/11/23. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for 2 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #30 and #40) observed during transfers. Failure to ensure proper use of a mechanical sit-to-stand lift and/or wheelchair placed Resident #30 and #40 at risk for possible accidents with/without injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Safe Resident Handling Equipment occurred on 05/02/24. This undated policy stated, . check resident care plan or [NAME] [certified nurse aide (CNA) instructions] prior to transfer for type and size of sling and amount of assistance required . position the harness around the upper body . arms outside the harness . adjust the foot pad as needed . EZ way seat strap if additional lower body support is needed . raises the resident slightly off the seated surface . slide the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide safe and secure storage of medications for 1 of 8 medication/treatment carts (Unit 2) observed during medication pass. Failure to store all medications securely may result in unauthorized access to medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication: Administration Including Scheduling and Medication Aides occurred on 05/02/24. This policy, revised 03/29/24, stated, . 5. Medications will be stored in a locked medication cart . Observation on the morning of 04/30/24 showed a nurse (#7) left Unit 2's medication/treatment cart to deliver medications to residents down the hallway. The cart remained unlocked, unattended, and not within the nurse's view. During an interview on the morning of 05/01/24, an administrative nurse (#1) confirmed she expected the medication cart to be locked when not being accessed to dispense medications.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #3). Failure to perform neurological checks following a head laceration/suspected head injury may result in delayed identification and treatment of the resident's medical condition. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Neurological Evaluation occurred on 09/27/23. This policy, dated 02/10/23, stated, . To establish a baseline neurological status upon which subsequent evaluations may be compared and changes in neurological status may be determined. Following a resident event that results in a known or suspected head injury . Initiate and document a baseline neurological evaluation . After the completion of initial neurological evaluation with vital signs, continue with evaluations every 30 minutes x [times] 4, then every eight hours x 3 days or as directed by the provider. Review of Resident #3's medical record occurred on 09/27/23. A progress note dated 09/24/23 at 2:02 a.m. identified, Late…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.17.1), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 3 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #18, #67, and #83) and one closed record (Resident #117). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents. Findings include: SECTION A: IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION The Long-Term Care Facility RAI Manual, revised October 2019, page A22-A23, states, . A1500: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) . Review the Level I PASRR form to determine whether a Level II PASRR was required. Review the PASRR report provided by the State if Level II screening was required. Code 0, no: . if any of the following apply: PASRR Level I screening did not result in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review/revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the residents' current status for 6 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #34, #36, #54, #80, #116, and #172). Failure to review/revise the care plans to reflect residents' current status limited the staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care for each resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plan occurred on 05/11/23. This policy, reviewed/revised on 09/22/22, states, . Each resident will have an individualized, person-centered, comprehensive plan of care that will include measurable goals and timetables directed toward achieving and maintaining the resident's optimal medical, nursing, physical, functional, spiritual, emotional, psychosocial, and educational needs.This plan of care will be modified to reflect the care currently required/provided for the resident. It will address the relationship of items or services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to label and date food to ensure food quality in 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 2 kitchenettes (Unit 2). Failure to store food with labels and dates has the potential to affect quality of food served to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen occurred on 05/08/23 at 11:30 a.m. with a dietary staff member (#7). Observation showed the following opened and undated items: * Lemon glazed bread and orange poppy bread * A box of gluten free taco shells * Bags of powdered sugar and brown sugar * A 25-pound container with rice Observation of the Unit 2 kitchenette occurred on 05/11/23 at 10:30 a.m. and showed the following opened and undated items: * Four different types of unidentifiable cereal in plastic containers * A bag of Raisin Bran * A bag of frozen gluten free bread * Plastic wrapped mozzarella and American cheese slices During an interview on 05/08/23 at 11:45 a.m., the dietary staff member (#7) confirmed the opened food items lacked labels and dates. 2. Based on observation, review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #25, #36, #57, #172, and #222). Failure to practice infection control during cares has the potential for transmission of communicable diseases and infections to residents and staff. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene occurred on 05/11/23. This policy, dated 10/21/22 stated, . hand hygiene is the single most important factor in preventing the spread of disease-causing organisms to patients and personnel in healthcare settings . all employees are responsible for maintaining adequate hand hygiene by adhering to specific infection control practices . adhere to the 4 moments of hand hygiene and 2 zones of hand hygiene . entering a room . before clean task . after bodily fluid/glove removal . exiting a room . zones: patient zone and health care zone . Hand hygiene should be performed after glove removal . hand sanitizer . when entering patient room . when gloves used to perform procedure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that maintained, enhanced, and respected the resident's dignity for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #102) observed during insulin administration. Failure to provide privacy in a manner/environment that maintained bodily privacy does not preserve the resident's right to privacy or enhance their quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Dignity occurred on 5/10/23. This policy, revised 10/26/22, stated, . maintain the dignity of all residents . care for the residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect . respecting resident's private space . Observations on 05/10/23 at 8:00 a.m. showed a nurse (#11) administer Resident #102's insulin in view of other residents and staff in the dining room and two adjacent hallways. The nurse after preparing the insulin pulled the resident's left shirt sleeve up and administered the dose then with the second insulin repeated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on information provided by the complainant, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to immediately notify the family/power of attorney (POA) of a change in the resident's condition for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #105) with impaired skin integrity. Failure to promptly notify the family/POA of changes in skin integrity limited their ability to make informed decisions regarding medical care. Findings include: The complainant alleged the facility failed to notify the family/POA when a resident experienced a change in their condition. Review of the facility policy titled Notification of Change occurred on 05/11/23. This policy, reviewed/revised on 11/29/22, stated, . A facility must . consult with the resident's . representative(s) . when there is . a significant change in the resident's physical . status . a need to . commence a new form of treatment . Review of Resident #105's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included pressure ulcers to the right heel and coccyx. The current care plan identified . The resident has actual pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Medicare Part A letters/notices and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the completion of the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) form (CMS-10055) for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #101 and #114) discharged from Medicare Part A services who remained in the facility. Failure to ensure the residents and/or resident representative received all available options for care and the option to appeal the termination of coverage has the potential to hinder the residents' right to an expedited review of a service termination. Findings include: Review of the Medicare Part A letters/notices for Residents #101 and #114 occurred the morning of 05/11/23. The review identified the facility provided the SNFABN form to Resident #101's resident representative on 02/14/23 and failed to obtain documentation of the resident's wishes for continued services and/or the option to appeal the termination of Medicare Part A coverage. The facility failed to provide the SNFABN form to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the North Dakota Provider Manual Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) and Level of Care Screening Procedures for Long Term Care Services, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a status change assessment for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #36) reviewed for PASARR. Failure to complete a change in status assessment with a newly diagnosed mental illness may result in the delivery of care and services that are inconsistent with the resident's needs. Findings include: The North Dakota PASARR Provider Manual, revised December 2020, page 13, states, . Change in Status Process . Whenever the following events occur, nursing facility staff must contact [the contracted agency] to update the Level I screen for determination of whether a first time or updated Level II evaluation must be performed. These situations suggest that a significant change in status has occurred: . If an individual with MI, ID, and/or RC [mental illness, intellectual disability, and conditions related to intellectual disability referred to in regulatory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #116) who required a stand-lift for transfers. Failure to ensure proper use of a mechanical stand-lift placed all residents at risk for accident and/or injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention and Management occurred on 05/11/23. This policy, revised 03/29/23, stated, . Fall - refers to unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor or other lower level. Communicate that a fall has occurred during shift change and daily stand-up meetings . Complete the Falls Tool UDA [form] if not done in the post-fall huddle. Report to the state regulatory agency when appropriate. Review of Resident #116's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis, pain, weakness, and a history of falls. The current care plan stated, . The resident has an ADL [activities of daily living] self care performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on information provided by the complainant, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting assistance for 2 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #25 and #172) dependent on staff for toileting. Failure to provide incontinence care may result in a loss of dignity and place residents at risk for skin breakdown. Findings include: Information provided by the complainant indicated staff failed to toilet residents as scheduled. The complainant indicated he/she observed a resident sitting in his/her bed or wheelchair soaked in urine. The facility failed to provide a copy of their policy addressing toileting cares upon request. - Review of Resident #25's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel and required total assistance from two or more staff members for toileting cares. The current care plan stated, . The resident has an ADL [activities of daily living] self care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #101) receiving oxygen. Failure of staff to ensure a physician's order for oxygen flow rate and document an oxygen flow rate may complicate a resident's respiratory status. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, Safety, Mask Types occurred on 05/10/23. This policy, dated 06/29/22, stated, .Turn gauge to start flow rate at prescribed liters per minute (per physician's orders) . Document as appropriate . Observation on all days of survey showed Resident #101 with continuous oxygen administered at two liters per nasal cannula. Review of Resident #101's medical record occurred on all days of survey and included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure. A provider order, dated 03/21/23, indicated, . 02 [oxygen] via nasal cannula to keep sats [saturation] > [greater than] 89. Review of oxygen saturation documentation from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #80 and #172) with a history of trauma and/or diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) received appropriate treatment and services to meet their assessed needs. Failure to provide appropriate person-centered and individualized treatment and services may result in resident's inability to attain their highest practicable mental and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care occurred on 05/11/23. This policy, reviewed/revised on 10/26/22, stated, . individual trauma results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life threatening and that has a lasting adverse effect on the individual's functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being. Trauma occurs when a resident's coping mechanisms are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$42,226 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $8,412 — penalty dated 2025-05-15
  • $33,814 — penalty dated 2025-05-15
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-15 for 25 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 91 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Edgebrook Care CenterEdgerton, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan - IndianolaIndianola, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan - Red OakRed Oak, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - AtkinsonAtkinson, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BlackduckBlackduck, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Grand Island VillageGrand Island, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - LakotaLakota, ND 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Mary Jane BrownLuverne, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Luke's VillageKearney, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - WindomWindom, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society De SmetDe Smet, SD 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society MillerMiller, SD 1 of 5Salem Lutheran HomeElk Horn, IA 1 of 5Souris Valley Care CenterVelva, ND 1 of 5St Vincent's - A Prospera CommunityBismarck, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan - AtwoodAtwood, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - Decatur CountyOberlin, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - EsthervilleEstherville, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - MansonManson, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - OttumwaOttumwa, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - WaukonWaukon, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BottineauBottineau, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Hastings VillageHastings, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - OakesOakes, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Park RiverPark River, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care CommunityRobbinsdale, MN 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St John'sKearney, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Martin VillageRapid City, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - SuperiorSuperior, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Waconia And Westview AcreWaconia, MN 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society CantonCanton, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Luther ManorSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society New UnderwoodNew Underwood, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls CenterSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls VillageSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan-LiberalLiberal, KS 2 of 5The Good Samaritan Society-Kissimmee VillageKissimmee, FL 3 of 5Good Samaritan - AlgonaAlgona, IA 3 of 5Good Samaritan - DavenportDavenport, IA 3 of 5Good Samaritan - HolsteinHolstein, IA

Showing 40 of 91; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SANFORDOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2019
THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2019
BROWN, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DYKHOUSE, DANAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
ENGBRECHT, WESLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
GASSEN, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
GULSVIG, NEILIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
HERSETH SANDLIN, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
LUNDEEN, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
MCCAUSLAND, MAUREENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MOLBERT, LAURISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
NORTH, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
SCHIEFFER, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SHULKIN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
TEIKEN, BRENTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
VENTLING-HERRMANN, MARNIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
WENZEL, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FLUIT, JOELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2026
MIDDLETON, AIMEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2022
OLSON, NICHOLASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2024
SCHEMA, NATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
CARTMILL, KAYLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/24/2025
JOHNSON, ANTHONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
MORRISON, TONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
SANDGREN, DEEANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2023
DTN STAFFING INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/02/2024
FOCUSONE SOLUTIONSOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2024
GRAPE TREE MEDICAL STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/13/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 57 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 8%Other / private 31%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$350per resident / day
operating cost
$10,640per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$392per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ND

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Dakota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Dakota
$11,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,304/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,729/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 355065. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next