Good Samaritan - Holstein

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. Staff F, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), and Staff E, CNA, used punitive restrictions and restraints to control Resident #1 preventing her from moving about. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of July 29, 2024, on August 17, 2024 at 11:20 AM. The Facility Staff removed the IJ on August 17, 2024 through the following actions: a. Head to toe assessment on Resident #1 to include assessment for emotional distress. b. Abuse and Neglect education for all staff implemented through an online course. Team members instructed to review course prior to the next scheduled shift. Daily educational huddles completed daily for two weeks. It was identified during survey Staff I worked 9 times prior to taking course and Staff J worked 12 times prior to taking course. c. Leadership supervision in memory care implemented to include daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record, policy and video review, and interviews, the facility failed to report suspected abuse immediately, and failed to separate an alleged abuser from the residents immediately. A staff member witnessed a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) with her hand covering the mouth of an agitated resident. She failed to report the suspicious activity for over 2 hours. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of July 29, 2024, on August 17, 2024 at 11:20 AM. The Facility Staff removed the IJ on August 17, 2024 through the following actions: a. Head to toe assessment on Resident #1 to include assessment for emotional distress. b. Abuse and Neglect education for all staff implemented through an online course. Team members instructed to review course prior to the next scheduled shift. Daily educational huddles completed daily for two weeks. c. Leadership supervision in memory care implemented to include daily oversight of behaviors, staff management and increased activities and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 2 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #21 and #51). The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment.On 4/6/26 at 3:10 PM Resident #21 stated the food was served cold at least once or twice a week. Resident #21 explained does not like cold food. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had a BIMS of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment.On 4/7/26 at 9:24 AM Resident #51 stated the food is frequently cool and would like it served warm. Resident #51 explained lunch and dinner were the meals that were served cold because his table was the last served. Continuous observation of lunch meal plates for the memory care unit revealed 1st tray placed in heated transport at 12:00 PM, sample plate placed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards by not completing appropriate hand hygiene during meal service to prevent cross contamination, to store food in accordance with professional standards by not dating open food items or disposing of expired food items. The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include: An initial kitchen observation on 4/6/26 at 10:30 AM revealed the 2 door refrigerator had a 3.5 container of cottage cheese with an open date of 4/1/26 and a best by date of 3/26/26, a large plastic container of carrots in water dated 3/31/26, an 8 oz. container of parmesan cheese with a best by date of 11/25 open without an open date, a container of parmesan cheese with a best by date of 7/16/25 open without an open date, a container of barbeque sauce outside of a store bought container with an open date of 2/19/26, a container of strawberry syrup with a best by date of 12/25 open without an open date,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, resident interview, resident family interview, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide dignity and respect to a resident when 2 briefs were applied for incontinency to 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #21 ). The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings Include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #21 required partial / moderate assistance with toilet hygiene. Review of Resident #21's EHR titled, Care Plan documented no interventions for utilization of 2 briefs for Resident #21.Review of Resident #21's EHR titled, Progress Note documented no discussions with Resident #21 or Resident #21's Daughter about the use of 2 briefs. Progress Notes documented no indications of trial or previous alternative interventions.On 4/6/26 at 3:17 PM Resident #21 explained the staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, document review, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, family interviews, staff interviews and policy review.The facility failed to protect a resident from the use of a physical restraint that the resident could not consistently remove on their own for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident # 9). The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings Include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment . The MDS reported Resident #9 utilized a trunk restraint in the wheelchair. The MDS also documented Resident #9 had diagnoses of anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, impulse disorder and unspecified intellectual disability. Review of a document provided by the facility on 4/6/26 titled, CMS 802 (Resident Matrix) documented use of a restraint for Resident #9. Review of Resident #9's EHR titled, Care Plan documented the resident utilized a seatbelt for physical restraints related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing care to a resident with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube, that was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 reviewed (Resident #9) and with missed opportunities for hand hygiene when personal cares were completed for 1 of 3 reviewed (Resident #21). The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #9 had a feeding tube in place.Review of Resident #9's EHR titled, Order Summary Report documented a physician's order to flush PEG tube with 200cc of tap water daily to maintain patency. Review of Resident #9's EHR titled, Care Plan documented Resident #9 required EBP related to peg tube placement with an initiation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy the facility failed to update the resident ' s care plan to accurately reflect the resident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #2, and #4) The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnosis of heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #1 was in hospice care. Review of the clinical census indicated that Resident #1 was admitted into Hospice care on 3/8/25. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #1 with a date initiated as of 7/23/24 revealed the facility failed to update the care plan to reflect Resident #1 was admitted to hospice care. 2. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented diagnosis of heart failure, renal insufficiency, peripheral vascular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to implement or follow through with advanced directives per resident directive upon admission for 1 of 21 residents reviewed (Resident #206). The facility reported a census of 49. Findings include: The entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #206 entered the facility on [DATE]. The Care Plan for Resident #206, implemented [DATE] did not document if the resident wanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should he require it. A review of clinical records and files on [DATE] showed they failed to document Resident #206 had a code status or advanced directive of any kind. His Electronic Health Record (EHR) lacked documentation the resident required CPR and did not indicate the resident was indicated as a do not resuscitate (DNR). In an interview on [DATE] at 3:54 PM with Resident #206, he was asked directly if he wanted CPR in the event he should need it. He was able to voice that yes, he wants CPR. In an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to develop a care plan to address risk factors and interventions for 3 out of 21 residents (Resident #10, #16, #31) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #10's MDS included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, non-alzheimer's dementia, anxiety and depression. The MDS documented Resident #10 was taking insulin injections during the 7 day look back period. A Physician Order dated 9/25/24 directed staff to obtain a FSBS (Finger Stick Blood Sugar) daily in the morning related to type 2 diabetes mellitus. A Physician Order dated 10/14/24 directed staff to administer Basaglar Insulin 100 unit/ml (milliliter) to inject 14 units subcutaneously (fatty tissue below the skin) one time a day related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on direct observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate oral cares for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #22, #24). The facility reported a census of 49. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #22, dated 12/9/2024, documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 00, indicating the resident was rarely/never understood. It documented the resident required substantial/maximal assistance to perform oral hygiene. The Care Plan for Resident #22, last revised 12/15/2024, documented the resident had his own teeth. It instructed staff to assist the resident with oral cares every AM and PM shift. Review of the Plan of Care Response History, printed 3/20/2025 at 10:08 AM, contained no documentation of oral cares performed in the last 30 days, the maximum look back period of the plan of care response history. 2. The MDS for Resident #24, dated 1/29/2025, documented the residents BIMS score as 03, indicating severely impaired cognition. It documented Resident #24 was fully…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accident and injuries for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #46). The facility also failed to ensure a wander guard (a monitoring bracelet with activated alarm when exiting) was working for resident safety on a daily basis for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for risk for elopement (Resident #49). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS identified Resident #46 required supervision/touching assistance with bed mobility and ambulation. The MDS identified Resident #46 required partial/moderate assistance for transfers. Resident #46's MDS included diagnoses of non-alzheimer's dementia, depression, hypothyroidism and other abnormalities of gait and mobility.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$99,103 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $99,103 — penalty dated 2024-08-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 55 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $883K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA