No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Good Samaritan - Ottumwa

2035 Chester Avenue, Ottumwa, IA 52501 · Non profit - Corporation · 126 certified beds · (641) 682-8041 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (641) 682-8041 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 20233 actual-harm citations$91,569 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $91,569 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-10)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1020 N Quincy Ave Ste 1 · (641) 683-4300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1940 Venture Dr · (641) 683-1357 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1325 Albia Rd · (641) 684-5520 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1821 W Finley Ave · (641) 682-7873 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1935 Greenwood Dr · (641) 680-2997

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.2%17.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.0%16.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.4%20.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.3%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.1%19.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.2%73.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.0%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%13.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.121.491.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.682.081.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.8%CMS range 44.6–63.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.4–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 4.8–15.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.82
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.28
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
31.2%
Total nursing turnover
23.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 102.5 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision or provide timely care in order to prevent a fall with major injury. The facility also failed to implement new interventions to reduce falls from the wheelchair for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2) for falls. The facility failed to ensure safe wheelchair transport and proper use of foot pedals during a general observation of Resident #67. The facility reported a census of 111. Findings: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 8/5/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #2 which included intellectual disabilities, seizure disorder, and pain. The MDS stated the resident was dependent on staff for chair to bed transfers, shower transfers, and toilet transfers. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 8 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The Slipped or Fell report dated 8/11/24 at 11:00 am documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of multiple pressure injuries. Facility also failed to follow physician treatment, using an incorrect medicated treatment on an open pressure injury and further failed to prevent contamination of pressure injuries while performing wound care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #96) observed for wound care. Facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #96 admission Assessment Record, dated 2/17/23, revealed resident was determined at risk for pressure ulcer development related to immobility. According to assessment, wounds present on admission included a right trochanter surgical wound and a pressure wound to coccyx. admission assessment indicated resident had anomaly to feet and informed that resident was not able to ambulate independently, with one assist, or with device (e.g. cane/walker/wheelchair) upon admission. Daily Skilled Progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out fall interventions in order to prevent a major injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #312) and failed to safely assist a resident with wheelchair locomotion for 1 resident during a general observation (Resident #84). The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 11/17/22, listed diagnoses for Resident #312 which included arthritis (inflammation of the joints), disorder of bone density, and pain. The MDS stated the resident required extensive assistance of 1 staff for personal hygiene, dressing, and bathing, depended completely on 1 staff for bed mobility and toilet use, and depend completely on 2 staff for transfers. The MDS stated the resident did not transfer or walk during the review period and listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The facility policy Fall Prevention and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, menu review, facility policy review, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow the breakfast menu when fruit was not served for 2 of 2 breakfast meals. The facility reported a census of 95 residents. Findings include: Review of the breakfast menu for 5/28/26 revealed the meal to be served included french toast, sausage patty, mixed fruit cup, choice of hot or cold cereal, assorted juice, milk/beverageDuring an observation on 5/28/26 at 6:57 AM, Staff H, Dietary [NAME] conducted the pre temperatures for breakfast service. All the hot foods, milk, and juice temped for service. No fruit cup observed.During an interview on 5/28/26 at 9:10 AM, Staff H queried about the fruit cup and Staff H stated they put the fruit in dishes and she didn't know it wasn't done. Staff H stated the fruit usually came out of the can and put into dishes and she didn't know what happened. During an interview on 5/28/26 at 2:03 PM, Resident #2 resident representative stated the residents didn't always get fruit and vegetables with meals.During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, the resident council notes, and the facility policy, the facility failed to routinely offer fresh water to residents for extended amounts of time for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #11) reviewed for hydration. The facility reported a census of 95 residents. Findings include: 1. The Resident Council Meeting Notes dated 4/21/26 revealed no fresh ice water, and fresh water at nights is an issue. The Resident Council Meeting Notes dated 5/19/26 revealed ice water was better than it was, not every day. During a continuous observation on 6/2/26 at 6:01 AM to 10:37 AM, no water pass completed on the 200 Hall. Multiple residents sat in the common area, in their wheelchairs with no tables within reaching distance. 2. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 scored a 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated that cognition severely impaired. The MDS indicated the resident needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices during medication administration when staff handled pills with bare hands for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #2, Resident #10 and Resident #15), failed to perform hand hygiene after glove removal, and failed to ensure hairbrushes were used for a single resident, and failed to cover and label toothbrushing supplies stored in a common bathroom. The facility reported a census of 95 residents. Findings include:1. During an observation on 5/27/26 at 4:24 PM, a CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) used the same hairbrush in the common area in the 200 Hall on 3 different residents. Then at 4:26 PM, the CNA brushed another resident's hair with the same hairbrush. During an observation on 6/1/26 at 9:11 AM, two hairbrushes (one pink and one teal wet brush) sat on the ledge in the common area in the 200 Hall. During an interview on 6/1/26 at 4:59 PM, Staff A, CNA queried on using the same hairbrush for the residents and Staff A stated yes, the hairbrushes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident representative interview, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner by placing him on a mattress in the common area when he is acting out for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 95 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 scored a 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated no behaviors exhibited verbal, physical, utilized a manual wheelchair, and required substantial/maximal assistance to roll right and left, lying to sitting on side on side of bed, and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. The diagnoses list included depression, heart failure, repeated falls, and polyarthritis (arthritis in multiple locations). Review of Resident #2's Care Plan dated 4/7/26 revealed a Focus area to address The resident has behavior symptoms; calling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a weight loss for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for a change in condition. The facility reported a census of 95 residents.Findings included:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/15/26, listed diagnoses for Resident #4 which included Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and muscle weakness. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, indicated a severe cognitive impairment. Care Plan entries, dated 3/28/25, stated the resident met the criteria for malnutrition and directed staff to monitor for weight loss. The facility policy Nutrition and Hydration-Food and Nutrition, dated 4/27/26, stated the facility would routinely assess the resident's nutritional status and monitor nutritional risk. The facility carried out a systematic method for obtaining, verifying, and interpreting data to identify nutrition related problems. The facility notified the physician as appropriate in evaluating and managing causes of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment due to dry wall tape falling from the ceiling in the sunroom, drywall scuffed off in 2 residents' rooms and the heat baseboard coming off the wall leaving a large crack for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for homelike environment (Resident #8 and Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 95 residents. Findings include:1. During an observation on 5/26/26 at 12:18 PM, a piece of drywall tape hung from the ceiling in the facility sunroom; and the drywall had a wet spot with bubbling from water damage. This observation remained unchanged on 5/27/26 at 9:46 AM, 5/28/26 at 1:04 PM, and 6/1/26 at 4:39 PM. 2. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition.During an observation on 5/26/26 at 4:01 PM, the drywall in Resident #8 room scuffed by her recliner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to check incontinent residents and change as needed every 2 hours for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #11 and Resident #15) reviewed for incontinent care; and failed to perform morning oral hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #11) for residents reviewed for oral hygiene. The facility reported a census of 95 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 out of 15, which indicated a severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #15 dependent with toileting hygiene, required substantial/maximal assistance with toilet transfer, and always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. The diagnoses list included Alzheimer's disease, renal insufficiency, and anxiety disorder. The MDS indicated the resident took a diuretic (commonly known as a water pill, medication that helps the kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to perform weekly skin observations for residents at risk of pressure ulcers and ensure a physician order in place prior to completing a wound dressing change for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #15) reviewed for assessment and intervention. The facility reported a census of 95 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 scored a 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The diagnoses list included depression, heart failure, repeated falls, and polyarthritis (arthritis in multiple locations). The assessment identified the resident at risk of pressure ulcer development. The MDS indicated Resident #2 without pressure ulcers, venous and arterial ulcers, or other wounds and skin issues. The MDS identified 9/27/25 as the admission date for Resident #2.Review of Resident #2's Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident representative interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for safety when staff left a resident with a history of falls unattended in the bathroom/shower room. The facility reported a census of 95 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 scored a 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #2 utilized a manual wheelchair, required substantial/maximal assistance to roll right and left, lying to sitting on side on side of bed, and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. The diagnoses list included depression, heart failure, repeated falls, and polyarthritis (arthritis in multiple locations). The MDS indicated resident had 2 falls with no injury since the last assessment (01/01/26).A review SAFE Resident Event documents revealed in 2026 Resident #2 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received ordered medications for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for the provision of medications(Residents #1 and #8). The facility reported a census of 95 residents.Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool for Resident #1, dated 2/18/26, list diagnoses included pain, cancer, and constipation. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicated intact cognition. The MDS identified 2/12/26 as the admission date for Resident #1. Review of a hospital Active Outpatient Medications dated 2/10/26 list documented an active order for buprenorphine (a potent, long-acting narcotic pain medication) 7.5 micrograms (mcg)/hour (hr) 1 patch to the skin every 7 days. Review of an eAdmin Record noted entered in the electronic health record (EHR) on 2/16/26 at 7:58 PM revealed the buprenorphine patch did not arrive from the pharmacy. Review of a History and Physical dated 2/17/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident representative interview, resident interview, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain appropriate food temperatures for a breakfast room tray. The facility reported a census of 95 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, which indicated cognition intact. During an interview on 5/26/26 at 4:01 PM, Resident #8 when asked about the food at the facility stated she didn't like the food. Resident #8 explained sometimes the food was hot and the meat can be cold on the outside and warm on the inside. Resident #8 stated the meat could partially cooked, or partially frozen. Review of the breakfast menu for 5/28/26 revealed the meal to be served included french toast, sausage patty, mixed fruit cup, choice of hot or cold cereal, assorted juice, milk/beverageDuring an observation on 5/28/26 at 6:57 AM, Staff H, Dietary [NAME] conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light within the reach of 1 out of 21 dependent residents (Resident #95) in the sample. The facility reported a census of 101. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #95, dated 10/24/2025, list of diagnoses included atrial fibrillation or other dysrhythmias (irregular heart rhythm) diabetes mellitus, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, and respiratory failure. The MDS identified Resident #95 dependent on staff for transfers and could not walk. The Care Plan for Resident #95, date initiated: 10/03/25, included a Focus area to address The resident has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit R/T (related to) copd (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Interventions included, in part: TRANSFER - Transfer Between Surfaces: assist x 2 with sit to stand with large harness if weak use the total lift high back large sling. Date Initiated: 11/7/25. During an observation on 12/02/2025 at 10:39 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to respond to a weight loss in timely manner for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #104) reviewed for weight change. The facility failed to notify the physician of a weight loss in a timely manner which delayed the implementation of dietician recommended interventions. The facility reported a census of 101 residents. Findings include:Review of Resident 104's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a diagnoses list which included hyperlipidemia, anxiety, depression, dementia, pain, and hypokalemia. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15 indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated Resident #104 required set up assistance with eating.Review of the Care Plan, initiated on 12/23/22, revealed a Focus area to address The resident has potential for nutrition issues r/t (related to) dementia, hx (history) surgical wound, anxiety d/o (disorder), muscle wasting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to use proper hand hygiene techniques during the administration of an insulin injection and eye drops for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed during medication administration observation. The facility reported a census of 101 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented that Resident #3's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes Mellitus. A Brief Interview for Mental Status documented a score of 07 out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. This MDS documented that Resident #3 received insulin injections 7 of the past 7 days of the review period. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of December 2025, directed Humulin KwikPen Suspension Pen-injector (Insulin) 10 units be administered in the AM and PM. Staff A , Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) signed the MAR on 12/3/25 to indicate the AM dose administered. Review of the MAR for the month of December 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to implement and follow physician orders for application of an ace wrap for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 92 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS revealed the resident had a diagnosis of heart failure. Clinical record review revealed an order dated 6/18/25 for an ace wrap to be applied to Resident #8's lower extremities in the morning and discontinued in the evening. Review of June, July and August 2025 Medication Administration Records found no documentation of ace wrap or compression stockings being used as ordered. Observation on 9/3/25 at 10:45 a.m. noted Resident #8 sat in his recliner with his feet elevated. Resident #8 wore socks and shoes, but no ace wrap or compression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure prompt intervention to ensure supplemental oxygen was administered in accordance with physician orders and each resident's individual care plan for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #6, #7). The facility reported census of 92 residents. Findings include: 1.According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with reference date 6/17/25, Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 14 out of 15, which indicated intact cognitive status. Resident #6 required moderate assistance with transfers, mobility and dependent assistance with dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs and determined as having a catheter and occasional incontinence of bowel. Resident #6's diagnosis included Parkinson's, coronary artery disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, malnutrition, benign prostatic hypertrophy, and a right femur neck fracture. According to physician orders, Resident #6 was to receive oxygen at 2-3 liters per minute for shortness of breath as needed to keep his oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to use enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during peri care for 1 of 3 residents who required EBP (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 92 residents. Findings include: According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 6/17/25, Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognitive status. Resident #6 required moderate assistance with transfers, mobility and dependent assistance with dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs and determined as having a catheter and occasional incontinence of bowel. Resident #6's diagnoses included Parkinson's, coronary artery disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, malnutrition, benign prostatic hypertrophy, and a right femur neck fracture. The Care Plan initiated 7/1/25, revised on 7/22/25, revealed the following: The resident requires Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) R/T (related to) indwelling catheter. The Intervention dated 7/22/25 revealed, [NAME] gown and gloves when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dignity to residents in the main dining room. Resident with soiled shirt of spilt drink and processed food propelled self near other residents eating thorough the dining area (Resident #71). The facility reported a census of 111 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 scored 00 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition was severely impaired. Diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia (indicates difficulty swallowing) and pain. The MDS revealed resident required supervision or touching assistance with eating and required a mechanically altered diet. The Care Plan revealed a focus area initiated 5/31/24 for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self care performance deficit related to Alzheimer's disease. The intervention dated 5/31/24 revealed resident required assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, electronic record review, Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (IPOST) form, and facility polic review the facility failed to ensure consistent documentation of code status for 1 of 32 resident reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #67). The facility reported a census of 111 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 medical diagnoses for Parkinson's disease, respiratory disease and scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The Care Plan revealed a focus initiated [DATE] for the resident, relayed had a terminal prognosis related to cancer and directed staff to review resident's advance care planning choices and assist other to respect choices. A document titled Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment IPOST dated [DATE] for Resident #67 was located at the nurse's station to review in the event of an emergency and indicated to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide eating assist to maintain good nutrition to 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #67). The facility reported a census of 111 residents. Findings include: The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 medical diagnoses included Parkinson's disease and respiratory disease. A BIMS score of 13 out of 15 indicated cognition intact. The Care Plan revealed a focus initiated at admit 8/27/24 for resident #67 titled, Eating. Interventions noted, resident required hand over hand guidance, reminding, prompting and cueing. Electronic record revealed admit weight on 9/4/24 weighed 198.8 pounds and on 10/2/24 weighed 182.8 pounds, an 8.75% weight loss. Progress notes revealed Registered Dietician (RD) note dated 8/30/24, observed him eating and cannot hold silverware, needs assistance, discussed with resident #67 and he would like that. Telephone interview on 10/11/24 at 10:02 AM with the RD, confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to assist with scheduled repositioning, and toileting for a resident with impaired skin and a pressure ulcer risk for 1 of 3 residents observed for skin concerns (Resident #81). The facility reported a census of 111 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, urinary tract infection (UTI), pain, and cellulitis of buttocks. Resident required substantial, maximal assistance with transfers and sit to stand, had moisture associated skin damage. Resident #81 required pressure reducing devices for the wheelchair and the bed, a turning/repositioning program to manage skin problems. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam scored 6 out of 15, which indicated cognition severely impaired. The Care Plan revealed a focus area revised 9/13/24 included potential of pressure ulcer development related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, family interviews, staff interviews and the facility policy the facility failed to ensure adequate hydration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #81). The facility reported a census of 111 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), pain, and cellulitis of buttocks, required substantial/maximal assistance with chair/bed to chair transfers and sitting to standing. the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam scored a 6 out of 15 indicated cognition severely impaired. The MDS revealed treatments that included a turning/repositioning program; and nutrition/ hydration interventions to manage skin problems. The Care Plan initiated date 4/8/24 for Resident #81 revealed a focus area for bladder incontinence related to confusion. The interventions included encourage resident to drink more fluids during morning and afternoon and limit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and the facility policy, the failed failed to use appropriate hand hygiene between resident's medication administration and failed to use proper technique for preparation of medication administration and touched resident's pills with their bare fingers for 2 of 5 oral medication administrations observed (Resident #13 and Resident #269). The facility reported a census of 111 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 10/8/24 at 7:23 AM, Staff A, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) finished giving another resident his pills and did not use hand hygiene prior to prepping Resident #13 medications. Staff A opened a bottle of acetaminophen and tapped the bottle and then used her finger to push out 2 pills into a medication cup. Staff A then prepped oral medications for Resident #13. Staff A popped out the furosemide pill from the card and as she popped it out, her fingers touched the pill prior to the tablet going into the cup. Staff A popped out the resident's gabapentin and as she popped the pill from the card her fingers touched the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and bathing records, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adequate personal hygiene services to include at least two bathing opportunities per week for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #3 & #9). The facility reported census was 110 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 3/28/24, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating a mildly impaired cognitive status. Resident #3 required maximal to dependent assistance with mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene needs. Resident #3 was coded as always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, & malnutrition. According to shower schedules, Resident #3 was to receive shower opportunities on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Bathing records during April and May 2024 indicated Resident #3 was not provided bathing opportunities as scheduled on 4/17, 5/4, 5/11, 5/15 and 5/18. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, bathing records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to ensure resident needs were met and bathing opportunities are provided as scheduled for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported census was 110 residents. Findings include: In an interview on 5/22/24 at 9:00 a.m. Staff O, staff scheduler, stated she schedules one nurse with two to three aides from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on the 300 hall and 400/500 halls. Then reduces to one nurse and two aides from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Staff O stated staffing parameters are based on census. In an interview on 5/21/24 at 3:00 p.m. Staff K, Certified Nurse Aide, stated two aides on 300 hall are sufficient to meet resident needs, however there are times weekly in which they may only have one aide working. In an interview on 5/21/24 at 3:05 p.m. Staff J, Certified Nurse Aide, stated she has worked evening shifts on 300 hall for seven months. Staff J stated two aides are needed on 300 hall to meet the needs of the residents, but noted at least once a week, they may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, free from possible hazards, and homelike environment. The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: On 8/21/23 at 11:35 AM the Sunroom located between 300 and 400 hallways revealed the ceiling had various water stains. One area had an active water leak that was collecting into a large blue tote surrounded by two yellow caution wet floor signs. The area remained accessible to residents. One of the walls closest to the water filled tote had bookcases filled with books and puzzles for residents. On 8/21/23 from 12:19 PM to 12:45 PM, multiple residents entered the sunroom, and made their way around the large blue tote. One of the residents mentioned that a water leak appeared a while ago and the facility recently made some roof repairs but the water leak continued from the air conditioning ducts. On 8/22/23 at 10:30 AM an observation of 100 Hall, (a secured section of the building occupied by residents with memory deficit) revealed multiple walls with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and the facility policy review, the facility failed to consistently answer call lights within a reasonable amount of time for 7 of 9 residents reviewed for staffing(Residents # 19, #22, #32, #49, #75, #100, and #362) . Residents and staff reported having low staffing caused missed or delayed cares. The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #100 dated 8/14/23 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) as 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented admission to the facility on 2/9/23. On 8/21/23 at 2:10 PM, Resident #100 reported he had to wait sometimes up to 3 hours for a meal service. He also reported the facility did not consistently provide him a shower twice weekly due to staff not showing up. Clinical record review for Resident #100 documented showers for August 1, 2023 to August 22, 2023: a. 8/2/23 b. 8/9/23 c. 8/13/23 d. 8/16/23 2. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure chicken thawed properly to avoid potential hazards of contamination to other foods. The facility failed to ensure hygienic practices with serving and with the kitchen ice machine. The facility reported a census of 113. Findings include: On 08/21/23 at 09:45 AM during the initial tour of the facility kitchen with the Dietary Supervisor observation included a baking sheet pan of chicken thawing on a shelf in the refrigerator. The pan had red liquid from the thawing meat that surrounded the chicken. The shelf below the baking sheet of chicken had several bags of food including already cooked chicken and another packaged food. On 8/21/23 at 09:47 AM the dietary supervisor acknowledged the thawing meat should be on the lowest shelf to cooler to avoid possibility of the chicken blood dripping on other foods. On 08/21/23 at 09:55 PM observation in the kitchen with the Dietary Supervisor revealed the ice scoop lying inside the machine on top of the ice. On 8/21/23 at 9:56 AM the Dietary Supervisor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and policy review the facility failed to cover clean linen carts in the hallways to ensure that clean linen was kept free from contamination. The facility also failed to perform hand hygiene or change gloves while performing wound cares and wound dressing change and further failed to sanitize treatment scissors when soiled for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #96) wound cares observed. The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation of housekeeping staff passing clean linens revealed the following; On 08/21/23 from 11:58 AM to 12:15 PM with continuous observation of housekeeping staff passing personal laundry from a clean clothing cart in the 600 hallway, half of the clothing remained uncovered and open to debris as housekeeping staff went in and out of multiple residents rooms. The clean personal clothing cart observed uncovered with staff and residents present and moving through the hallway to and from the dining room. Observation on 08/23/23 at 13:03 PM of clean personal linen cart on the 400…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect throughout cares provided for 2 of 7 residents reviewed. (Resident #76 and Resident #85).The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident#76 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS reflected Resident #76 diagnosis of Developmental disorder of speech and language, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and non-traumatic brain dysfunction. The MDS further documented Resident #76 required total dependence on staff for performing activities of daily living. On 8/23/23 at 09:43 AM Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) with 6 years of experience in the position, stated that on 8/1/23 she walked by the shower room, and overheard Staff E, CNA yell at Resident #76. She also reported that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0574 — isolated
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and family interview the facility failed to post required notifications of ombudsman, survey agencies, and other support for advocacy. The facility also failed to provide accessibility of the survey results. The facility reported a census of 113. Findings Include: On 8/21/23 at 10:15 AM Family Member visiting requested information on how to contact state agencies. It was relayed the information is usually posted at the entrance or halls for easy access. The surveyor proceeded with family down two hallways to the front door and could not locate any signage other than a sign in a glass cabinet that noted This facility's survey results for the past three (3) years are available. The family member reported he did not know how to contact any state agencies and did not recall getting the information. On 8/22/23 at 9:50 AM the Administrator reported a tube with postings in his office and a framed copy of resident rights on the floor. The administrator indicated due to renovations and a plan for painting the hallway, signs were removed and being kept in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete Beneficiary Notification forms for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for the implementation of Advanced Beneficiary Notification (ABN). Findings include: 1. Review of facility provided form titled SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, signed on 08/11/23, for Resident #21 revealed there was no resident payment preference option selected in Section G: Options. 2. Review of facility provided form titled SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, signed on 05/12/23, for Resident #12 revealed there was no resident payment preference option selected in Section G: Options. On 08/24/23 at 02:00 PM the facility Social Worker verified there was no option selected for Resident #21 and Resident #12 and confirmed an option selection is required for form completion. Review of facility policy titled Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), with review/revision dated 02/14/23, revealed the expectation that the provider will issue the notice of non-coverage to appropriately inform beneficiaries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain personal privacy and resident information confidential for 2 residents (Resident #76 and Resident #85) out of 7 reviewed. The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #76 dated 6/19/23 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS reflected Resident #76 diagnoses including Developmental disorder of speech and language, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and non-traumatic brain dysfunction. The MDS further documented Resident #76 required total dependence on staff for performing activities of daily living. On 8/23/23 at 1:10 PM Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported she had witnessed Staff E, CNA, use a personal cell phone while at work numerous times, including using social media TikTok live and FaceTime, then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, documentation reviews and the facility policy review, the facility failed to report alleged violations related to mistreatment of 2 residents (Resident #76 and Resident #85) out of 2 reviewed. The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident#76 dated 6/19/23 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS reflected Resident #76 diagnoses including Developmental disorder of speech and language, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and non-traumatic brain dysfunction. The MDS further documented Resident #76 required total dependence on staff for performing activities of daily living. On 8/23/23 at 09:43 AM Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) with 6 years of experience in the position, stated that on 8/1/23 while walking by the shower room, she overheard Staff E, CNA yelling at Resident #76. She later approached Staff F, CNA who gave a shower to Resident #76…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect (Resident #76 and Resident #85). The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident#76 dated 6/19/23 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS reflected Resident #76 diagnosis of Developmental disorder of speech and language, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and non-traumatic brain dysfunction. The MDS further documented Resident #76 required total dependence on staff for performing activities of daily living. On 8/23/23 at 1:00 PM Staff J, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported that she made verbal reports to charge nurse and to Assistant of Director of Nursing (ADON) about witnessing mistreatment of Resident #76 and other residents by Staff E, CNA during cares. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 3 of 30 residents reviewed (Resident #4, Resident #103, Resident #104). The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4, dated 7/9/23, documented diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and transient ischemic attack (TIA). The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August 2023 revealed Resident #4 took Donepezil HCL 10 mg once per day at bedtime for unspecified dementia and Duloxetine HCL 60 mg every morning and at bedtime for other specified depressive episodes. The MAR identified both medications started 7/3/23 on admission. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) failed to address goals, desired outcomes, or resident preferences related to depression or dementia. The daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly update the Comprehensive Care Plan care for 3 of 30 residents (Resident #21, Resident #103, Resident #104) reviewed for care plan intervention effectiveness, review, and revision. The facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #21 listed skin and ulcer/injury treatments that included pressure reducing devices for chair and bed, nutrition or hydration interventions, pressure ulcer/injury care, and application of nonsurgical dressings. Diagnoses included cancer and pain. The MDS identified a BIMS score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) for Resident #21, dated 6/30/23, documented a focus area of 'The resident has stage 4.' The goal documented the resident had a stage 4 that will be healed by review date 10/20/23. The CCP failed to include information specific to Resident #21's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow Physician's orders for ACE wraps daily application causing unrelieved swelling of lower extremities and discomfort for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #19). The facility also failed to prime an insulin pen injection prior to administration and/or further failed to keep insulin pen in place after injection for the appropriate amount of time for 2 of 2 residents observed receiving insulin (Resident #86 and #103). The Facility reported a census of 113 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (Admission) completed on 6/01/23 listed the following diagnoses for Resident #19: hip fracture, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, cellulitis of right lower limb. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment most recently completed 5/31/23 revealed a score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Review of the current Care Plan listed the focus area: impairment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement interventions for blood glucose reading below 70 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) and for blood glucose readings above 400 mg/dL for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #63 and Resident #81). The facility census reported a census of 113. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 scored 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severe cognition impairment. The MDS revealed a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM). The MDS revealed the resident received insulin injections 7 out of 7 days. The Care Plan dated 7/31/23 revealed a focus area of diabetic therapy. The interventions dated 1/21/21 revealed the resident's condition needed monitored based on clinical practice guidelines or clinical standards of practice related to the use of Lantus and Novolog. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104, dated 7/10/23, documented diagnoses of sepsis, kidney failure, and diabetes with diabetic neuropathy. Section H of the MDS, titled Bladder and Bowel, documented an indwelling catheter. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 5/31/23 documented an indwelling catheter related to kidney failure with a goal to remain free from catheter related trauma through the review date of 9/19/23. Interventions included monitor for signs and symptoms of discomfort on urination and frequency and catheter care by CNA Q (every) shift and PRN. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August 2023 revealed the resident took ciprofloxacin HCl 500 mg twice a day for possible UTI/penile infection from 8/13/23 through 8/21/23. The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for August 2023 documented a urinalysis on 8/13/23 and the foley catheter changed 8/13/23 for possible infection. Observation on 08/22/23 at 02:31 PM revealed Resident #104 propelled himself around the common area. His catheter bag rested in a dignity bag under his chair. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident#96 had diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (DM) as an active diagnosis. MDS revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score to be 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #96 had one or more unstageable deep tissue injuries that were not present upon admission. MDS revealed that Resident #96 received pressure ulcer/injury care and the application of non-surgical dressings with or without topical medications. The Braden scale with lock date of 1/16/23, used to assess for the risk of pressure injury development, indicated the resident was at risk for pressure sores. The Care Plan documented the resident had potential for pressure ulcer development related to immobility with the initiated date of 2/17/23. The goal indicated that the resident will have intact skin free of redness, blisters or discoloration by/through review date. The Care Plan, revealed the focus area for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$91,569 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $35,968 — penalty dated 2024-10-10
  • $55,601 — penalty dated 2023-08-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
The other 91 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Edgebrook Care CenterEdgerton, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan - IndianolaIndianola, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan - Red OakRed Oak, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - AtkinsonAtkinson, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BlackduckBlackduck, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Grand Island VillageGrand Island, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - LakotaLakota, ND 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Mary Jane BrownLuverne, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Luke's VillageKearney, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - WindomWindom, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society De SmetDe Smet, SD 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society MillerMiller, SD 1 of 5Salem Lutheran HomeElk Horn, IA 1 of 5Souris Valley Care CenterVelva, ND 1 of 5St Vincent's - A Prospera CommunityBismarck, ND 1 of 5Sunset Drive - a Prospera CommunityMandan, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan - AtwoodAtwood, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - Decatur CountyOberlin, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - EsthervilleEstherville, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - MansonManson, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - WaukonWaukon, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BottineauBottineau, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Hastings VillageHastings, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - OakesOakes, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Park RiverPark River, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care CommunityRobbinsdale, MN 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St John'sKearney, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Martin VillageRapid City, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - SuperiorSuperior, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Waconia And Westview AcreWaconia, MN 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society CantonCanton, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Luther ManorSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society New UnderwoodNew Underwood, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls CenterSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls VillageSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan-LiberalLiberal, KS 2 of 5The Good Samaritan Society-Kissimmee VillageKissimmee, FL 3 of 5Good Samaritan - AlgonaAlgona, IA 3 of 5Good Samaritan - DavenportDavenport, IA 3 of 5Good Samaritan - HolsteinHolstein, IA

Showing 40 of 91; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SANFORDOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2019
BROWN, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
DYKHOUSE, DANAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
ENGBRECHT, WESLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
GASSEN, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/30/2024
GULSVIG, NEILIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
HERSETH SANDLIN, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
LUNDEEN, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
MCCAUSLAND, MAUREENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
MOLBERT, LAURISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
NORTH, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
SCHIEFFER, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
SHULKIN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
TEIKEN, BRENTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
VENTLING-HERRMANN, MARNIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/30/2024
WENZEL, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
FLUIT, JOELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2022
MIDDLETON, AIMEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/27/2022
OLSON, NICHOLASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/08/2024
SCHEMA, NATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2022
THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2019
ADAM, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/22/2024
MORRISON, TONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
QUINN, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/22/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 46%Medicare 5%Other / private 49%

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$301per resident / day
operating cost
$9,142per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165211. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next