No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Good Samaritan Society - Mary Jane Brown

110 South Walnut Avenue, Luverne, MN 56156 · Non profit - Corporation · 51 certified beds · (507) 283-2375 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Feb 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$57,045 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $57,045 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-06)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
916 Holder Street · (712) 477-2185 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
202 S Kniss Ave · (507) 283-9549 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
220 W Main St · (507) 449-9702 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Luverne City Park, 698 E Main St · (507) 449-2388 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
500 N Kniss Ave · (507) 283-4431

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.5%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%4.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.4%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.8%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%4.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.9%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.3%12.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.9%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.2%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.7%82.7%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.1%CMS range 38.5–74.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.0–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified86.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay9.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 2.9–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.97
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 46.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.19 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-01)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to compressively assess falls for root cause, implement appropriate interventions and follow the care plan to prevent and/or reduce the risk of falls with major injury 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R3) with history of falls. This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R2 who sustained multiple left rib fractures, left clavicle fracture and a subdural hematoma (brain bleed). The IJ began on 7/27/24 when staff failed to implement R2's care plan for close supervision resulting in R2's fifth (5th) unwitnessed fall, major head injury, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The administrator, regional nurse manager, and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 8/2/24 at 3:00 p.m. The IJ was removed on 8/3/24 at 12:00 p.m., when the facility had implemented immediate corrective action to prevent recurrence, but noncompliance remained at a lower scope and severity of a D with no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor, clean 1 of 1 refrigerator in the dining room designated for food brought in for residents by family members. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observations on 3/30/26 at 11:53 a.m. with Cook-A of the refrigerator, located in the dining room, used for resident food brought into the facility from outside sources identified a log was posted on the front of the refrigerator titled Resident Fridge Food Items. On the log there were entries for Resident, Food item, Arrival Date, Open date, and Expiration Date. The log had dates of 3/17, 3/18, 4/19, 4/21, but no indication of the year was identified. The next dates were 12/28/25, 12/29/25, 12/30/25, and 3/5/26. A second sign, identifying instructions titled for Resident Food Only listed:All food must be labeled with name and date-Please use labels next to fridge.Food will be thrown away if it is expired.All food in open containers over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-01 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data, during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Quarter 4) 2025 (July 1 through September 30) to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS.Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705 D identified the facility had excessively low staffing during Quarter 4, 2025 (July 1 through September 30). Review of the 1702D report for quarter 4 of 2025 (July 1 through September 30) and staffing schedules identified during an average week, Monday through Friday, during the day shift, there were several days that multiple registered nurses had been working. These hours had been submitted to PBJ as direct care RN'S rather than RN's with administrative duties. For example, on:8/26/25, 6 registered nurses were coded as RN's (direct care staff with no administrative duties) on the report. Staffing schedules identified 4 of 6 RN's were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding tube placement was confirmed prior to initiation of a feeding for 1 of 1 resident (R2). Findings include: R2's, undated, current Medical Diagnosis list identified diagnoses of hemiplegia (total loss of voluntary movement on one side) and hemiparesis (partial weakness, allowing some movement) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting his left side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and severe cognitive impairment. R2's 1/28/26, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified he had severe cognitive impairment. R2 received 51% or more of his total calories through tube feeding, and 501 cc/day or more fluid intake by tube feeding. R2's current undated care plan, identified he had a nutritional problem or potential related to neuromuscular impairment and swallowing dysfunction (Dysphagia) following a stroke evidenced by hemiplegia and hemiparesis of his left side. Staff were to weigh R2 daily. And…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents (R4, R15, R18, R32 and R91's) discontinued controlled narcotic medications were not stored with in-use medications in 2 of 2 medication carts. Findings include: Observation and Medication Administration Record (MAR) on [DATE] at 6:03 p.m., with registered nurse (RN)-D and licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B during a controlled narcotic medication count of 2 of 2 medication carts identified: 1) R4 had 1 box of 5 Fentanyl 25 mcg patches stored in the East medication cart, which RN-D identified had been sent in error by the pharmacy and received by the facility on [DATE] or [DATE]. The pharmacy had been notified on [DATE] when the error had been discovered and confirmed none of the incorrect patches had been administered. She reported the patches had been left in the medication cart until they could be destroyed. 2) R18 had 2 unopened blister packs each containing 30 tablets of Lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (MG) which RN-D…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview the facility failed to ensure resident mail was delivered consistently on Saturdays for 2 of 2 residents (R18, and R25) who voiced concerns with mail delivery. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R25's 12/11/24, Significant Change in Condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R25's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Interview on 1/13/25 at 1:10 p.m., during the Resident Council meeting, R25 identified he did not always get mail on Saturdays because there was only one activity staff who worked on Saturdays so there were times when his mail was not delivered until Sunday or Monday. R18's 12/10/24, Significant Change in Condition MDS assessment identified R18's cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 15. Interview on 1/14/25 at 7:34 a.m., with R18 identified she did not receive mail every Saturday and it was a hit or miss as the activity staff were only here long enough to help feed residents at noon and then they left. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R11) care plan was revised to show meal preferences. Findings include: R11's 12/16/24, significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified his cognition was moderately impaired, he required limited assistance with transfers and activities of daily living (ADL's). R11 had diagnosis of dementia, diabetes, Parkinson's disease, and anxiety disorder. Interview on 1/12/25 at 11:42 a.m., with family member (FM)-A identified she has told staff several times that he does not like fish or turkey, but they continue to serve it to him. Review of R11's nutritional assessment identified multiple foods that R11 did not like but made no mention of his request not to be served fish. R11's current care plan identified a nutritional focus with a goal for R11 to express that his nutritional needs are being met and that he feels supported. The staff were to discuss coping behaviors related to self-image concerns, he prefers to dine in his room, uses adaptive equipment and staff should monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed administer 1 of 1 medication (levothyroxine) according to labeled instructions for 1 of 25 medication administration observations. Findings include: Observation and interview on 1/13/25 at 8:29 a.m., with licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A as she obtained R 92's Levothyroxine 150 micrograms (mcg) from the medication cart. The order on the electronic medical record (MAR) identified: (Levothyroxine) Synthroid Oral tablet 150 mcg 1 tablet by mouth (PO) one time a day (QD) before breakfast. LPN-A removed the card containing the medication, checked it against the MAR and punched out a pill into the medication cup. The label on the bubble pack directed take 1 tablet PO QD before breakfast. Do not take with Iron, Aluminum, Magnesium, or Calcium containing products. LPN-A returned the card to the medication cart and continued dispensing R92's medications into the same medication cup. R92's medications in the same med cup included: Calcium 600 mg/D3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) for 1 of 1 resident (R12) reviewed for unnecessary medications per facility policy and procedure. Findings include: R12 was admitted [DATE] and had a diagnosis of dementia, depression, and heart failure. He had taken Seroquel (treats schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and manic disorder) 25 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for dementia with a start date of 1/19/24 and sertraline (treats depression) 100 mg daily for depression with a start date of 9/16/23. R12's, 12/11/24 Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified he was cognitively impaired had little interest or pleasure in doing things and had felt down, depressed, or hopeless never to 1 day. R12 had taken antipsychotics and antidepressants on a scheduled basis. R12's, medical record identified an initial AIMS (test used to assess abnormal movements in people with on anti-psychotic or psychotropic medication) in September 2023. The medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices for 1 of 2 residents (R2) indwelling catheter. Findings include: R2's, 12/11/24 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, identified she was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder (bladder problems related to injury or disease), which required a urinary draining bag (tube that collects urine from the bladder). R2's, current, undated care plan identified interventions for staff to monitor, record, and report to the health care provider signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI), such as pain, burning, blood-tinged, foul-smelling urine, fever, altered mental status, change in behaviors, and change in eating patterns. During initial interview and observation on 1/12/25 at 11:46 a.m., with registered nurse (RN)-A and R2 identified R2 was seated in her recliner and the urinary drainage bag was hung from the trash can over a gray basin that was placed on the floor next to R2's recliner. R2 stated she and nursing staff hung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolated
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 8 staff received newly hired staff nursing assistant (NA-D) received initial training on Alzheimer's disease or related disorders, assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), problem solving with challenging behaviors, and communication skills. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the employee file for nursing assistant (NA)-D had a hire date of 10/29/24. Interview on 1/13/25 at 4:41 p.m., with interim director of nursing would expect Alzheimer/Dementia training to be completed for all staff who are taking care of vulnerable adults at the facility. Review of August 2024 Facility Assessment identified the facility would train staff on Dementia and behavioral health during general orientation. In addition, the facility would provide annual staff in-services pertaining to Federal and State requirements related to continuity of care and resident safety. Copy of NA-D training policy was requested and not provided during survey.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 3 residents observed for infection prevention. Findings include: R3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R3 had intact cognition with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes, and depression. R3's care plan dated 12/4/24 indicated R3 required EBP related to indwelling medical devices: urinary catheter and feeding tube. R3's care plan instructs to don (put on) gown and gloves when performing high contact care activities including dressing, bathing, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, repositioning, checking and changing, device care and/or use, and wound care. On 12/27/24 at 11:17 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A and nursing assistant (NA)-A were observed entering R3's room with a full mechanical lift. A magnet on the doorframe of the room indicated enhanced barrier precautions were required for high contact resident care activities including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive bladder assessment and develop an individualized toileting program to restore, maintain, or prevent a decline in continence for 2 of 2 residents; R3 who had a change in mobility and R2 who had a documented decline in continence. Findings include: R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment with diagnoses of cancer, heart failure, arthritis, and Parkinson's disease. R3 had no impairment of range of motion and used a walker. R3 was independent with his activities of daily living (ADLs) except needed supervision with eating and oral hygiene. R3 had no history of falls. R3 was always continent of bowel and bladder and did not have a toileting program. R3's bowel and bladder assessment from the Nursing Admit Re-Admit data collection ([NAME]) tool, dated 6/6/24, indicated R3 was continent of bowel and bladder. No other bowel and bladder information was included on the assessment. R3's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who required a two-handled cup for drinking liquids. Findings include: R1's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of quadriplegia, fracture of neck and dysphagia. R1's care plan revised on 1/5/24, directed staff to place table over bed lined up with paper on the wall, in front of R1 but not over his hands. R1 requires moderately thick water to be on the table in a double handled cup with a lid. On 2/6/24 at 4:51 p.m., R1 was observed laying in his bed which was along the wall, bed side table was noted to be in the middle of the room and had a one handled water pitcher on it. There was a bright orange sign posted on the wall, on R1's right side, that directed staff to place bedside table lined up with the paper and moderately thick water to be placed on the table in a double handle cup with a lid. There was also a plastic disposable cup with thickened water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown was consistently assessed and monitored for healing progress for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of quadriplegia, fracture of neck and dysphagia. R1's care plan revised on 1/4/24, indicated R1 was at risk for pressure ulcer development and R1 always required heel protectors on while in bed. R1's physician progress note dated 1/9/24, revealed R1 was assessed, and no skin concerns were identified. R1's Skin Observation revealed: -On 1/21/24, R1 was noted to have a small brown area on left heel. -On 1/28/24, lacked evidence of R1's heel progress. -On 2/4/24, R1's left outer heel had a small, scabbed area. R1's Wound Data Collection dated 2/6/24, indicated R1 had a distal scabbed area on left heel and was noted to be 2 centimeters (cm) in length and 1 cm wide. Scab was noted to be firmly attached and no redness or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown was consistently assessed and monitored for healing progress for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of quadriplegia, fracture of neck and dysphagia. R1's care plan revised on 1/4/24, indicated R1 was at risk for pressure ulcer development and R1 always required heel protectors on while in bed. R1's physician progress note dated 1/9/24, revealed R1 was assessed, and no skin concerns were identified. R1's Skin Observation revealed: -On 1/21/24, R1 was noted to have a small brown area on left heel. -On 1/28/24, lacked evidence of R1's heel progress. -On 2/4/24, R1's left outer heel had a small, scabbed area. R1's Wound Data Collection dated 2/6/24, indicated R1 had a distal scabbed area on left heel and was noted to be 2 centimeters (cm) in length and 1 cm wide. Scab was noted to be firmly attached and no redness or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to provide an altered diet as prescribed for 1 of 2 residents (R3) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had diagnoses which included dementia, diabetes, and dysphagia. Further, MDS revealed R3 had severely impaired cognition and required a mechanically altered and therapeutic diet. R3's physician orders dated 10/2/23, indicated R3 required a pureed textured diet. R3's care plan as of 2/6/24, indicated R3 was able to independently eat at times however required cues from staff as R3 was noted to stop chewing. Staff were expected to assist R3 was eating if needed and give R3 small bites. On 2/6/24 at 5:45 p.m., R3 was served her dinner plate by dietary aid (DA)-A. Nursing assistant (NA)-A was seated on R3's right side, assisting R3 with her meal. NA-A was noted to say R3 would not eat for NA-A. R3 was observed to have mashed potatoes and pasta noodles with red sauce on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide and meet the assessed needs for 4 of 4 residents (R26, R27, R35, R250) who voiced concern with lack of sufficient staffing in the facility and/or were observed to have assessed needs not provided per staff. In addition, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide assistance with meals. The lack of sufficient staff had the potential to affect all 47 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: R26 R26's face sheet printed on 10/18/23, included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (abnormal body movement), muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rate), gait abnormality, cognitive-communicative deficit (abnormal thinking/speaking), hypovolemia (low blood volume), hypotension (low blood pressure), abnormal coagulation (blood clotting), and frequency of micturition (frequency of urination) R26's significant change in status minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to mark/date opened containers of food stored in one of three kitchen refrigerators, stand-up freezer, and walk-in freezer, failed to ensure expired food were identified and removed, and failed to ensure the walk-in freezer vent was in safe working condition and food was stored away from leaking vent. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents who were served food and beverages from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During observation and interview of the kitchen on 10/16/23 at 12:36 p.m., with dietary manager (DM)-A, observed food items in the walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer, standup freezer, and resident refrigerator that were not dated or marked and/or were expired. DM-A indicated all kitchen staff were responsible for checking food for opened dates and expiration dates, all refrigerators and freezers should be gone through at least weekly to check for expired or damaged food. DM-A indicated if any food or drink item…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure data submitted to the QAPI committee was analyzed and documented to ensure areas identified had oversight for their perspective outcomes brought forth. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents. Findings include: Review of quarterly QAPI meetings from January 2023 through April 2023, identified the facility departments were submitting data to be reviewed by the committee. 2 examples of failure to analyze and document that process identified in: January 2023 1. The aim was to reduce falls with major injury, the data identified the state norm, the national norm, and the facility rate. The QAPI minutes lacked any indication of a measurable goal, or an action plan to improve the rate of falls with major injury. 2. The aim was to reduce significant weight loss with a goal to have less than 3 residents without a program trigger for significant weight loss. The data identified there were 4 triggered in November and 3 triggered in December. The QAPI minutes lacked any indication of an action plan or plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer vent was maintained in a safe and functional manner. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents who resided within the facility. Findings include: An initial walk through of the kitchen was completed with dietary manager (DM)-A on 10/16/23 at 1:07 p.m., observed the walk-in freezer had a large amount of condensation present to freezer vent, large amount of ice present on coiling, a 3-4 tier metal rack containing frozen food items directly below freezer vent, top tier containing frozen sealed loafs of bread were completely covered with large chunks of ice, sporadic smaller ice chunks on boxes containing frozen foods to rest of metal tiers, ice spots noted to walk-in freezer flooring next to metal rack. DM-A indicated awareness of condensation build-up to freezer vent over past 1-2 weeks, maintenance checked out and cleared condensation build-up, stated condensation continued. DM-A stated same issue occurred approx. 3-4 mos. ago, had to contact refrigeration company to fix.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practice for 1 of 1 resident (R27) reviewed for urinary catheter. In addition, the facility failed to offer hand sanitization prior to serving meals to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R3, R39), who required staff assistance for to maintain clean hygiene, reviewed for dining. Findings include: R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R27 was cognitively intact, had clear speech, was understood and able to understand others, was dependent upon staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting cares, did not walk, and used a wheelchair for mobility. R27's MDS also indicated R27 did not display any behaviors including rejection of cares, had an indwelling catheter for urination, was frequently incontinent of bowel, had diagnoses including cerebrovascular infarction (stroke), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (paralysis), diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar), renal (kidney) insufficiency, obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R5, R38, and R41) were appropriately vaccinated against pneumococcal disease upon admission and/or offer updated vaccination per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) vaccination recommendations. This had the ability to affect all 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the current CDC pneumococcal vaccine guidelines located at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/hcp/pneumo-vaccine-timing.html, identified for: Adults [AGE] years of age or older, staff were to offer and/or provide based off previous vaccination status as shown below: a) If NO history of vaccination, offer and/or provide: aa) the PCV-20 OR bb) PCV-15 followed by PPSV-23 at least 1 year later. b) For PPSV-23 vaccine ONLY (at any age): aa) PCV-20 at least 1 year after prior PPSV-23 OR bb) PCV-15 at least 1 year after prior PPSV-23 c) For PCV-13 vaccine ONLY (at any age): aa) PCV-20 at least 1 year after prior PCV13 OR bb) PPSV-23 at least 1 year after prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate and required information was documented and communicated to a receiving healthcare facility to ensure continuity of care when transferred emergently to the hospital for 1 of 4 residents (R26) reviewed for accidents. Finding include: R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R26's diagnoses listed on face sheet received on 10/18/23, included Parkinson's disease (abnormal body movement), muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rate), gait abnormality, cognitive-communicative deficit (abnormal brain/speech processing), hypotension (low blood pressure), abnormal coagulation (blood clotting), frequency of micturition (frequency of urination), and urinary tract infection (UTI). R26's medicare 5-day minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified R26 had intact cognition, had clear speech, was able to understand and understood by others. R26 required limited assist from staff for transfers, extensive assist from 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a written copy of the bed hold policy for 1 of 4 residents (R26) reviewed for accidents, who was transferred emergently to the hospital. Findings include R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R26's diagnoses listed on face sheet received on 10/18/23, included Parkinson's disease (abnormal body movement), muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rate), gait abnormality, cognitive-communicative deficit (abnormal brain/speech processing), hypotension (low blood pressure), abnormal coagulation (blood clotting), frequency of micturition (frequency of urination), and urinary tract infection (UTI). R26's medicare 5-day minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified R26 had intact cognition, had clear speech, was able to understand and understood by others. R26 required limited assist from staff for transfers, extensive assist from 1 staff with toileting. R26 used a walker and wheelchair for mobility. Facility transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R5) after being updated multiple times by family of R5's preference to wear a brassiere (bra) daily. Findings include: R5's 8/15/23, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified R5 was cognitively impaired and had diagnosis of depression, stroke, obesity, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. Interview on 10/16/23, at 5:44 p.m., with FM-(A) identified that he had asked at care conference multiple times to make sure R5 had a bra on each morning, however when FM-A comes to visit in the afternoon, R5 does not have a brazier on. FM-A identified that when family expresses concern at care conference, they notice a change for a week or two, then things go back to the way they were, he stated care conference feels like a waste of my time. R5's undated, current care plan printed 10/18/23, identified R5 required extensive assistance with dressing, bed mobility, and is dependent on staff for transfers and toileting. R5's care plan lacked any indication that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) including shaving and bathing cares for 1 of 4 residents (R250) reviewed for ADLs, and who required supervision to limited staff assistance to maintain good personal hygiene. Findings include: R250's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R250 had intact cognition and required supervision to limited staff assistance with personal hygiene and bathing cares. R250's care plan was revised and printed on 10/18/23; indicated R250 was an early riser, staff to offer to assist or supervise with AM/PM cares, required supervision and cues with personal hygiene- offer to assist if required, and staff to assist with bathing cares twice weekly on Tuesday and Saturday during day. During an observation and interview on 10/16/23 at 2:40 p.m., R250 was observed to have long facial hair present above lips, facial hair approx. 1-2 cm in length. R250 indicated needing assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services were completed to maintain and/or improve mobility for 1 of 3 residents (R27), who required range of motion (ROM), reviewed for mobility. Findings include: R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R27 had intact cognition, had impairment to left upper extremity and bilateral lower extremities, required extensive assist from 2 staff for bed mobility and transfers, did not walk and used a wheelchair for mobility. R27's diagnosis report printed on 10/18/23, indicated hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis) of left side of body, cerebral infarction (stroke), type 2 diabetes mellitus ((DM)- abnormal blood sugar), cognitive communicative deficit (abnormal processing of thinking/speaking), muscle weakness, major depression (mood disorder), and pain. R27's order summary report printed on 10/18/23, indicated orders for activity level as tolerated with assistance and restorative services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident's (R1) oxygen had been administered per physician orders. Findings include: R1's August 2023, admission record identified diagnoses of pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs), asthma, abnormal heart rhythm and heart failure. R1's 9/23/23, Physicians Order Summary Report identified R1 was to receive oxygen at 2 liters (L) per minute (PM), continuously via nasal cannula (NC). There was no mention R1 had orders to titrate her oxygen for supplemental purposes at any other rate other than the 2 LPM. R1's 9/25/23, 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, identified R1's cognition was intact. The MDS failed to identify R1 used oxygen therapy. R1's progress notes identified on: 1) 10/3/23, 10/5/23 and 10/6/23, R1 was administered oxygen at 1.5 LPM via NC. 2) 10/7/23, 10/15/23 and 10/18/23, R1 was administered oxygen at 1 LPM via NC. R1's undated, current care plan identified R1 had asthma and required scheduled nebulizing medications use to enhance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to individualize the care plan to include target behaviors for psychotropic medication use for 3 of 5 (R1, R38, and R40) residents. Findings include: R1's August 2023, admission Record identified a diagnoses of vascular dementia, schizoaffective disorder (mental illness that can affect your thoughts, mood and behavior), depression, and anxiety. R1's 9/25/23, 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R1 had no behaviors noted. R1 required assistance with activities of daily living. R1's 10/12/23, signed medication review report identified the following: 1) risperidone (antipsychotic) 2mg at night, start date of 8/22/23. 2) vilazodone (antidepressant) 20mg daily and buproprion (antidepressant) 300mg daily, start date of 8/23/23. R1's undated, care plan indicated, R1 was prescribed risperidone related to vascular dementia without behavioral, psychotic, mood disturbance and anxiety. Staff were to monitor resident on guidelines related to use of risperidone and consult pharmacy to consider dosage reduction when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility policy and protocols to verify narcotic count to prevent potential diversion for 1 of 1 resident (R18). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were appropriately labeled according to manufacturer's guidelines with an open date for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R21). Findings include: Observation and interview on 10/18/23 at 3:05 p.m., of registered nurse (RN)-B and licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B, and the regional consultant identified they were in the process of verifying the narcotic count of medication in the west wing medication cart. RN-B revealed R18's liquid morphine sulfate was unaccounted for during narcotic count. RN-B reported R18's morphine had been delievered the evening R18 had passed away (10/2/23). The medication was meant to be sent back to the pharmacy for credit and had not logged the morphine into the bound book but with time constraints that evening that had not occurred. RN-B and LPN-B confirmed pharmacy delivers medications/narcotics in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 required members (infection preventionist) and/or thier designee attended and documented the attendance at the quarterly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. Findings include: Review of the January 2023, through July 2023, quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes attendance record did not identify the facility infection preventionist was present at the July 2023 meeting. Interview on 10/17/23, at 11:54 a.m., QAPI coordinator identified the infection preventionist could not make it to the meeting and they did not delegate anyone to stand in her place. Interview on 10/18/23, at 4:04 p.m., with administrator identified it was his expectation that the appropriate people would be at QAPI as required and as identified in the QAPI plan and would have expected the infection preventionist to delegate another team member with similar qualifications to go in her place if she was not able to attend. Review of the 2023 QAPI plan identified the medical director,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$57,045 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $57,045 — penalty dated 2024-08-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 91 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Edgebrook Care CenterEdgerton, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan - IndianolaIndianola, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan - Red OakRed Oak, IA 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - AtkinsonAtkinson, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BlackduckBlackduck, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Grand Island VillageGrand Island, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - LakotaLakota, ND 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Luke's VillageKearney, NE 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society - WindomWindom, MN 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society De SmetDe Smet, SD 1 of 5Good Samaritan Society MillerMiller, SD 1 of 5Salem Lutheran HomeElk Horn, IA 1 of 5Souris Valley Care CenterVelva, ND 1 of 5St Vincent's - A Prospera CommunityBismarck, ND 1 of 5Sunset Drive - a Prospera CommunityMandan, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan - AtwoodAtwood, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - Decatur CountyOberlin, KS 2 of 5Good Samaritan - EsthervilleEstherville, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - MansonManson, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - OttumwaOttumwa, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan - WaukonWaukon, IA 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - BottineauBottineau, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Hastings VillageHastings, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - OakesOakes, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Park RiverPark River, ND 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care CommunityRobbinsdale, MN 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St John'sKearney, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - St Martin VillageRapid City, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - SuperiorSuperior, NE 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society - Waconia And Westview AcreWaconia, MN 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society CantonCanton, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Luther ManorSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society New UnderwoodNew Underwood, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls CenterSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls VillageSioux Falls, SD 2 of 5Good Samaritan-LiberalLiberal, KS 2 of 5The Good Samaritan Society-Kissimmee VillageKissimmee, FL 3 of 5Good Samaritan - AlgonaAlgona, IA 3 of 5Good Samaritan - DavenportDavenport, IA 3 of 5Good Samaritan - HolsteinHolstein, IA

Showing 40 of 91; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SANFORDOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2019
THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2019
BROWN, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DYKHOUSE, DANAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
ENGBRECHT, WESLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
GASSEN, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
GULSVIG, NEILIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
HERSETH SANDLIN, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
LUNDEEN, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
MCCAUSLAND, MAUREENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MOLBERT, LAURISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
NORTH, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
SCHIEFFER, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SHULKIN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
TEIKEN, BRENTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
VENTLING-HERRMANN, MARNIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2024
WENZEL, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FLUIT, JOELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022
MIDDLETON, AIMEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2022
OLSON, NICHOLASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2024
SCHEMA, NATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
CHESLEY, STEPHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2018
MORRISON, TONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
SANDGREN, DEEANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2023
YEATON, TIMOTHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
DTN STAFFING INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/02/2024
FOCUSONE SOLUTIONSOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2024
GRAPE TREE MEDICAL STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/13/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 54 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 31%Medicare 7%Other / private 63%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,184per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$296per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245568. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next