Good Samaritan Society - St Martin Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 57.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.39 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.57 to 0.95 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint review, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to follow their policy for reporting to the SD DOH and one of one sampled resident's (1) representative of the resident's injury of bruising to her left arm and hand with unknown cause (origin).Findings include:1 Review of a 7/16/25 SD DOH complaint intake revealed that during the weekend of 7/4/25, resident 1 was visited by her family. The resident's left hand and arm had shown no signs of injury at that time. The resident's family had returned a few days later to visit and noticed extreme bruising and swelling of her [the resident's] left hand and forearm. Digital photographs of resident 1's hand taken by the family during that visit showed the underside of the resident's hand had purple and black bruising of her fingers and palm that extended upwards to her forearm. The entire top of the resident's left hand was similarly bruised. The resident's family had not been notified that resident 1 had been injured.Interview on 9/4/25 at 9:00 a.m. and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint review, observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure an investigation was completed and documented for one of one sampled resident (1) with an injury of bruising to the resident's left arm and hand with unknown cause (origin).Findings include:1 Review of a 7/16/25 SD DOH complaint intake revealed that during the weekend of 7/4/25, resident 1 was visited by her family. The resident's left hand and arm had shown no signs of injury at that time. The resident's family had returned a few days later to visit and noticed extreme bruising and swelling of her [the resident's] left hand and forearm. Digital photographs of resident 1's hand taken during that visit showed the underside of the resident's hand had purple and black bruising of her fingers and palm that extended upwards to her forearm. The entire top of the resident's left hand was similarly bruised. Observations 9/3/25 at 10:10 a.m. of resident 1's room revealed there were bilateral 1/4 siderails on her bed, and it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to follow nursing professional standards of practice for implementing and documenting neurological checks according to the provider's policy for one of one sampled resident (2) who had fallen and sustained a head injury. Findings include:1. Record review of resident 2's electronic health record (EHR) revealed:*She was admitted to the facility on [DATE].*Her diagnoses included blindness, cerebral infarction (stroke), hearing loss, rheumatoid arthritis (an auto-immune disease affecting small joints in the hands and feet, and can damage other body systems), repeated falls, major depressive disorder, dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities) without behavioral, psychotic, and mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage (fall with head injury that caused bleeding inside the skull).*She had been taking Aspirin (an anticoagulant or blood thinner medication) since 2021.*Her fall risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to support residents' right to choose and receive the frequency and type of shower or bath consistent with their preferences for 7 of 17 sampled residents (20, 13, 38, 18, 15, 42, and 306). Findings include: 1. Interview on 3/24/25 at 3:30 p.m. with resident 20's daughter/power of attorney (POA) revealed: *Resident 20 was scheduled for a bath weekly. *She previously was bathed twice weekly but resident 20's daughter/POA was told she no longer received twice weekly baths because there was not enough staff to accommodate that. Review of resident 20's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her 2/17/25 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score was 6, which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. *She was documented to have been bathed weekly. *Her Sit-Stand-Walk Data Collection Tool assessment indicated she preferred two or more baths per week. *Resident 20's 3/26/25 care plan did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure two of eight sampled residents' (1 and 51) care plans were revised to reflect their current status and care needs. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 3/24/25 at 3:13 p.m. with resident 51 and his spouse revealed: *The resident's room was without any personal items from home. *He was admitted to the facility after back surgery. He had a complicated and extensive hospitalization. *His goal was to return home with his spouse after his rehabilitation stay at the facility. *His pain had improved since he was admitted to the facility. *The resident's affect was flat. *In early March 2025, the resident's medical provider had recommended he see a counselor for his worsening depression. -The resident's spouse had asked that a male counselor see the resident. She was told there were no male counselors available to have met with the resident. No other counseling alternatives had been discussed with her or the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, grievance review, and facility assessment review, the provider failed to have enough sufficient staff available to promote resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for: *Eleven of fifteen sampled residents (7, 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, 26, 33, 38, 42, and 306) who were dependent on the staff to assist them with grooming, bathing, and toileting. *Five of five additional residents (22, 36, 45, 54, and 55) who had filed grievances on bathing and extended call light response time. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 3/24/25 at 2:14 p.m. with resident 33's in her room revealed, she: *Had multiple long gray facial hairs extending from her chin. *Reported that there were times when it took staff a long time to answer her call light. *Had waited longer to have her call light answered at night. Review of resident 33's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed: *She was admitted on [DATE]. *Her Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *Two nurses had signed for the receipt of controlled medications (medications at risk for abuse and addiction) on the controlled drug record for five of five residents (6, 15, 21, 24, and 31) who were prescribed controlled medications *One prescribed controlled liquid medication concentration was documented on the Controlled Drug Record for one of one resident (31). *The destruction of fentanyl patches for one of one sampled resident (6) was accurately documented appropriately by individuals authorized to destroy controlled medications. Findings include: 1. Observation on 3/24/25 at 2:30 p.m. of the controlled substance binders on the south medication carts revealed: *A handwritten Controlled Drug Record identified as resident 15's for 24 lorazepam (a controlled anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) tablets did not indicate when the medication was received or who verified the receipt of the medication. *A Controlled Drug Record identified as resident 6's for 60 pregabalin (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, policy review, and manufacturer's recommendations review, the provider failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent related to: *A topical pain medication was not applied according to the manufacturer's recommendations for two of two sampled residents (18 and 42) by one of one observed registered nurse (RN) (S). *An oral medication was given to one of one sampled resident (42) without a physician's order by one of one observed RN (S). Those observations created a medication error rate of 10.71%. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 3/26/25 from 7:42 a.m. through 8:28 a.m. of registered nurse (RN) S during medication (med) administration revealed: *She dispensed an unknown amount of diclofenac sodium external gel 1% (for arthritis pain and inflammation) into a med cup and administered the gel to resident 18's right lower chest. -The order on resident 18's medication administration record (MAR) indicated she was to receive two grams of the gel. *She dispensed an unknown amount of diclofenac sodium external…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the provider failed to ensure: *Medications for two of two residents (28 and 12) were properly labeled. *Medications for four of four residents (28, 50, 6, 12) were dated when opened. *Temperatures for two of two medication rooms (north and south) were monitored for acceptable medication storage temperatures according to the provider's policy. *Expired nutritional supplements and supplies were removed from two of two medication rooms (north and south). Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 3/24/25 at 2:40 p.m. of a south medication cart with registered nurse (RN) G revealed: *There was a plastic bag with resident 28's identifying information on the outside of the plastic bag. -In the plastic bag was a Levemir (long-acting) insulin pen. --The Levemir pen did not have a resident's name on the label. --It was marked as opened on 2/11/24. *RN G verified the date the Levemir was opened was marked 2/11/24 and there was no resident name on the insulin pen. *She indicated a medication should be labeled with a resident's name to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *The physician was notified of medications not administered due to unavailability as directed in the provider's policy for one of one sampled resident (20). *A physician's order to take vital signs every six hours was followed for one of one sampled resident (38) for an infection. Findings include: 1. Review of resident 20's medication administration record (MAR) revealed: *She had physician's order for Benefiber Oral Tablet Chewable (Wheat Dextrin) [fiber supplement] 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for constipation related to DRUG INDUCED CONSTIPATION. -In March 2025 resident 20's Benefiber was documented not available 13 times. --Unlicensed medication aide (UMA) L had documented all the medication not available in March 2025 for the Benefiber. *She had a physician's order for Citracal Plus Tablet (Multiple Minerals-Vitamins) [calcium with vitamin D supplement] 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY. -Resident 20's Citracal was documented as not available on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — 92 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SD